Nov. 9, 2025
Light Pollution Dilemmas, Cosmic Parasol Proposals & Salvaging Space Junk
Light Pollution, Space Parasols, and Salvaging Satellites In this engaging Q&A episode of Space Nuts, hosts Andrew Dunkley and Professor Jonti Horner tackle a range of thought-provoking questions from listeners. From the effects of light pollution...
Light Pollution, Space Parasols, and Salvaging Satellites
In this engaging Q&A episode of Space Nuts, hosts Andrew Dunkley and Professor Jonti Horner tackle a range of thought-provoking questions from listeners. From the effects of light pollution on stargazing to the intriguing concept of a space parasol for climate control, this episode is packed with cosmic curiosities and insightful discussions that will leave you contemplating the future of humanity in space.
Episode Highlights:
- Light Pollution and Night Sky Visibility: Mark from Connecticut wonders how quickly the night sky would become visible if all electric lights suddenly went out. Andrew and Jonti discuss the immediate effects of light pollution and the importance of dark adaptation for optimal stargazing, emphasizing the impact of atmospheric conditions on visibility.
- Geoengineering and Space Parasols: Doug raises the question of whether a parasol at Lagrange Point 1 could help mitigate climate change. The hosts explore the feasibility of such a project, discussing the challenges of scale, technology, and the implications of geoengineering on the Earth's climate system.
- Salvage Rights in Space: A listener inquires about the ownership of defunct satellites and the potential for salvage rights in space. Andrew and Jonti explain the current legal landscape surrounding space debris, the challenges of recovery, and the evolving nature of space law as commercial interests grow.
- Searching for Extraterrestrial Life: Robert from the Netherlands asks about the role of radio waves in searching for alien civilizations. The hosts delve into the efforts of the SETI program, the challenges of detecting signals, and the potential of the Square Kilometer Array to listen for extraterrestrial communications.
For more Space Nuts, including our continuously updating newsfeed and to listen to all our episodes, visit our website. Follow us on social media at SpaceNutsPod on Facebook, X, YouTube Music Music, Tumblr, Instagram, and TikTok. We love engaging with our community, so be sure to drop us a message or comment on your favorite platform.
If you’d like to help support Space Nuts and join our growing family of insiders for commercial-free episodes and more, visit spacenutspodcast.com/about.
Stay curious, keep looking up, and join us next time for more stellar insights and cosmic wonders. Until then, clear skies and happy stargazing.
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/space-nuts-astronomy-insights-cosmic-discoveries--2631155/support.
In this engaging Q&A episode of Space Nuts, hosts Andrew Dunkley and Professor Jonti Horner tackle a range of thought-provoking questions from listeners. From the effects of light pollution on stargazing to the intriguing concept of a space parasol for climate control, this episode is packed with cosmic curiosities and insightful discussions that will leave you contemplating the future of humanity in space.
Episode Highlights:
- Light Pollution and Night Sky Visibility: Mark from Connecticut wonders how quickly the night sky would become visible if all electric lights suddenly went out. Andrew and Jonti discuss the immediate effects of light pollution and the importance of dark adaptation for optimal stargazing, emphasizing the impact of atmospheric conditions on visibility.
- Geoengineering and Space Parasols: Doug raises the question of whether a parasol at Lagrange Point 1 could help mitigate climate change. The hosts explore the feasibility of such a project, discussing the challenges of scale, technology, and the implications of geoengineering on the Earth's climate system.
- Salvage Rights in Space: A listener inquires about the ownership of defunct satellites and the potential for salvage rights in space. Andrew and Jonti explain the current legal landscape surrounding space debris, the challenges of recovery, and the evolving nature of space law as commercial interests grow.
- Searching for Extraterrestrial Life: Robert from the Netherlands asks about the role of radio waves in searching for alien civilizations. The hosts delve into the efforts of the SETI program, the challenges of detecting signals, and the potential of the Square Kilometer Array to listen for extraterrestrial communications.
For more Space Nuts, including our continuously updating newsfeed and to listen to all our episodes, visit our website. Follow us on social media at SpaceNutsPod on Facebook, X, YouTube Music Music, Tumblr, Instagram, and TikTok. We love engaging with our community, so be sure to drop us a message or comment on your favorite platform.
If you’d like to help support Space Nuts and join our growing family of insiders for commercial-free episodes and more, visit spacenutspodcast.com/about.
Stay curious, keep looking up, and join us next time for more stellar insights and cosmic wonders. Until then, clear skies and happy stargazing.
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/space-nuts-astronomy-insights-cosmic-discoveries--2631155/support.
WEBVTT
0
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:00.440
Jonti Horner: Hi there.
1
00:00:00.440 --> 00:00:02.720
Andrew Dunkley: Thanks for joining us on Space Nuts Q and A
2
00:00:02.720 --> 00:00:04.760
edition. This is where the audience sets the
3
00:00:04.760 --> 00:00:06.880
agenda, and we answer the questions to the
4
00:00:06.880 --> 00:00:08.920
best of our ability, which is not much
5
00:00:08.920 --> 00:00:11.380
ability at all, but we'll do it anyway. Uh,
6
00:00:11.380 --> 00:00:13.440
coming up, questions about light pollution.
7
00:00:13.520 --> 00:00:16.279
A, uh, space parasol to protect
8
00:00:16.279 --> 00:00:19.120
Earth. Interesting. Uh, also salvage
9
00:00:19.120 --> 00:00:21.840
rights in space and radio waves.
10
00:00:22.000 --> 00:00:24.560
That's all coming up on space nuts.
11
00:00:24.800 --> 00:00:27.280
15 seconds. Guidance is internal.
12
00:00:27.520 --> 00:00:30.240
10, 9, ignition
13
00:00:30.240 --> 00:00:33.066
sequence. Star nuts. 5, 4,
14
00:00:33.134 --> 00:00:36.126
3, 2. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 5, 4,
15
00:00:36.194 --> 00:00:37.180
3, 2, 1.
16
00:00:37.260 --> 00:00:38.380
Jonti Horner: Space nuts.
17
00:00:38.460 --> 00:00:41.420
Andrew Dunkley: Astronauts report it feels good. And
18
00:00:41.420 --> 00:00:43.820
he's back again. Professor Jonti Horner,
19
00:00:43.820 --> 00:00:45.580
professor of Astrophysics at the University
20
00:00:45.580 --> 00:00:47.740
of Southern Queensland. Jonti. Hi there.
21
00:00:48.220 --> 00:00:49.580
Jonti Horner: Good afternoon. How are you going?
22
00:00:49.660 --> 00:00:52.660
Andrew Dunkley: I am well. Want to get
23
00:00:52.660 --> 00:00:53.340
straight into it?
24
00:00:53.740 --> 00:00:55.180
Jonti Horner: Yeah, let's dive on in.
25
00:00:55.260 --> 00:00:57.780
Andrew Dunkley: Okay. Question time. And our, uh, first
26
00:00:57.780 --> 00:00:59.740
question comes from Mark.
27
00:01:00.660 --> 00:01:02.980
He says, hello. I have a question about light
28
00:01:02.980 --> 00:01:05.340
pollution. I live in Connecticut, and the
29
00:01:05.340 --> 00:01:07.220
light pollution is not as bad as New York
30
00:01:07.220 --> 00:01:10.020
City, but it is enough. I'm planning a trip
31
00:01:10.020 --> 00:01:12.700
to Montana this summer just to see the night
32
00:01:12.700 --> 00:01:15.500
sky. My question is, if I was standing
33
00:01:15.500 --> 00:01:18.020
in my yard and there was a sudden EMP
34
00:01:18.340 --> 00:01:20.660
burst and all the electric lights went out,
35
00:01:20.900 --> 00:01:23.420
how long would it take for me to be able to
36
00:01:23.420 --> 00:01:26.420
see the night sky in Connecticut as clear and
37
00:01:26.500 --> 00:01:29.220
as. As beautiful as Point Nemo? I understand
38
00:01:29.380 --> 00:01:31.860
light speed is fast, but how fast
39
00:01:32.260 --> 00:01:35.100
would it be to clear the view? I've
40
00:01:35.100 --> 00:01:37.580
just, uh, recently discovered your podcast. I
41
00:01:37.580 --> 00:01:40.260
learned something new with each uh, one.
42
00:01:40.680 --> 00:01:42.739
Uh, please keep up the outstanding work. I
43
00:01:42.739 --> 00:01:45.020
look forward to every new episode.
44
00:01:45.020 --> 00:01:47.820
Sincerely, Mark Bookbinder. Thank you,
45
00:01:47.820 --> 00:01:49.700
Mark. That's a lovely comment. Uh, we don't
46
00:01:49.700 --> 00:01:51.780
get many nice comments. Everyone's usually
47
00:01:51.780 --> 00:01:53.820
sticking the knife in. No, I'm not kidding.
48
00:01:53.820 --> 00:01:56.700
Most people, uh, are terrific. Um,
49
00:01:56.790 --> 00:01:58.910
although we get the occasional jibe, but that
50
00:01:58.910 --> 00:02:01.780
goes with the territory. Um,
51
00:02:01.780 --> 00:02:04.710
yeah, look, I. I had a think about this one,
52
00:02:04.710 --> 00:02:06.070
and I. I would suggest.
53
00:02:07.750 --> 00:02:09.710
I don't want to steal your thunder, Jonti,
54
00:02:09.710 --> 00:02:10.990
because I know you've done your homework, but
55
00:02:10.990 --> 00:02:12.990
I would suggest that it would be fairly
56
00:02:12.990 --> 00:02:15.110
instantaneous because the amount of light
57
00:02:15.110 --> 00:02:17.910
coming down would be the same.
58
00:02:18.710 --> 00:02:20.910
It's just that it's disturbed by the light
59
00:02:20.910 --> 00:02:23.630
we're sending up. So when that light we are
60
00:02:23.630 --> 00:02:26.340
creating suddenly disappeared, surely
61
00:02:26.340 --> 00:02:28.860
the effect would be an instant
62
00:02:29.340 --> 00:02:31.260
view of what's really happening up there.
63
00:02:32.540 --> 00:02:34.540
Jonti Horner: Effectively, I think that's pretty much it.
64
00:02:34.700 --> 00:02:37.620
Um, uh, now, there's a few
65
00:02:37.620 --> 00:02:38.940
things that fall into that, and that's a
66
00:02:38.940 --> 00:02:41.180
really good kind of executive summary type
67
00:02:41.180 --> 00:02:43.700
level. So the reason that Light pollution is
68
00:02:43.700 --> 00:02:45.420
a problem for you. Seeing the night sky and
69
00:02:45.420 --> 00:02:48.180
all its wonder is you're basically increasing
70
00:02:48.180 --> 00:02:50.020
the brightness of the whole sky by an
71
00:02:50.020 --> 00:02:52.660
artificial amount which washes out the
72
00:02:52.660 --> 00:02:55.020
fine detail of the darker, the fainter stuff.
73
00:02:55.260 --> 00:02:57.140
So the brighter your light pollution levels
74
00:02:57.140 --> 00:02:59.700
are, uh, the brighter the sky is and so the
75
00:02:59.700 --> 00:03:01.460
fewer faint objects you can see and the more
76
00:03:01.460 --> 00:03:03.940
you brighten that, the less you'll see. If
77
00:03:03.940 --> 00:03:06.660
you turn all the lights off at once, the sky
78
00:03:06.660 --> 00:03:09.420
will almost instantaneously become as dark
79
00:03:09.580 --> 00:03:12.140
as it could possibly be. And then what's
80
00:03:12.140 --> 00:03:14.540
working against you is the adaptation of your
81
00:03:14.540 --> 00:03:17.420
eye. So we have this thing called dark
82
00:03:17.420 --> 00:03:20.320
adaptation and m, it's how our eye
83
00:03:20.480 --> 00:03:22.600
adjusts and responds to low light levels to
84
00:03:22.600 --> 00:03:24.520
allow us to function in those levels
85
00:03:24.520 --> 00:03:27.480
effectively. And you get the bulk of
86
00:03:27.480 --> 00:03:29.200
your dark adaption within about the first
87
00:03:29.200 --> 00:03:32.120
five minutes. But your eyes continue
88
00:03:32.120 --> 00:03:34.280
adapting and getting better and better at
89
00:03:34.280 --> 00:03:37.200
seeing in the dark over about
90
00:03:37.200 --> 00:03:40.080
45 minute period. So you have to be out under
91
00:03:40.080 --> 00:03:42.120
the night sky and avoid looking at any
92
00:03:42.120 --> 00:03:44.880
sources of bright light for about 45
93
00:03:44.880 --> 00:03:46.840
minutes before you're as adapted as you can
94
00:03:46.840 --> 00:03:49.000
be and you can get the best possible view you
95
00:03:49.000 --> 00:03:52.000
can get. Now what would happen is if you
96
00:03:52.000 --> 00:03:54.040
were out and about in your sadly light
97
00:03:54.040 --> 00:03:56.800
polluted skies in Connecticut, um,
98
00:03:57.160 --> 00:03:59.520
you are um, not very well dark adapted
99
00:03:59.520 --> 00:04:02.160
because the sky is very bright. So your clock
100
00:04:02.160 --> 00:04:04.000
would have to start ticking from the point
101
00:04:04.000 --> 00:04:05.720
the lights went out. So I would hope that the
102
00:04:05.720 --> 00:04:07.520
lights stared out for at least an hour for
103
00:04:07.520 --> 00:04:10.440
you to give you the best possible view. But
104
00:04:10.440 --> 00:04:12.280
even then you might not get the best view of
105
00:04:12.280 --> 00:04:13.920
the night sky you could anywhere on Earth,
106
00:04:13.920 --> 00:04:15.840
because you then run into the issues of the
107
00:04:15.840 --> 00:04:18.610
Earth's atmosphere. Um, now I
108
00:04:18.930 --> 00:04:20.930
regularly go out to the wonderful Lady
109
00:04:20.930 --> 00:04:22.450
Elliott island on the Barrier Reef where
110
00:04:22.450 --> 00:04:24.250
there's effectively no light pollution at all
111
00:04:24.250 --> 00:04:26.410
and the sky is dark enough that for example,
112
00:04:26.410 --> 00:04:29.050
I can see the Triangulum galaxy, which is
113
00:04:29.050 --> 00:04:31.570
fainter than Andromeda. I can see pretty much
114
00:04:31.570 --> 00:04:33.290
every time I go out there there's a darker
115
00:04:33.290 --> 00:04:36.170
light and um, I lead guessing
116
00:04:36.170 --> 00:04:38.090
some stargazing there and m tell them how
117
00:04:38.090 --> 00:04:40.250
awesome the sky is. But I make the point that
118
00:04:40.250 --> 00:04:41.770
if they were to go to the centre of
119
00:04:41.770 --> 00:04:44.040
Australia, to somewhere like Uluru or out
120
00:04:44.040 --> 00:04:46.440
into the Nullarborg Desert, they'd actually
121
00:04:46.440 --> 00:04:49.120
see a better sky there than we see at Lady
122
00:04:49.120 --> 00:04:51.200
Elliot. Because at Lady Elliot you have a
123
00:04:51.200 --> 00:04:52.920
limitation that you're surrounded by very
124
00:04:52.920 --> 00:04:55.120
humid, very turbulent air because of the
125
00:04:55.120 --> 00:04:57.200
energy from the ocean stirring the air up.
126
00:04:57.760 --> 00:05:00.680
And so different locations on the Earth offer
127
00:05:00.680 --> 00:05:02.880
different clarity of the night sky.
128
00:05:03.600 --> 00:05:06.080
So what I'd suggest is from Connecticut,
129
00:05:06.480 --> 00:05:08.320
I've got the light pollution map up here,
130
00:05:08.640 --> 00:05:10.760
which, um, is light pollutionmap.info for
131
00:05:10.760 --> 00:05:12.640
people who want to look and weep at how bad
132
00:05:12.640 --> 00:05:15.110
the skies are from their location and plan
133
00:05:15.110 --> 00:05:17.590
their dark sky holidays. That's a really nice
134
00:05:17.590 --> 00:05:20.310
little website. You're relatively coastal
135
00:05:20.390 --> 00:05:21.910
and so therefore your air is going to be
136
00:05:21.910 --> 00:05:23.390
quite humid and turbulent. And I would
137
00:05:23.390 --> 00:05:25.950
suggest if you turned, turned all the lights
138
00:05:25.950 --> 00:05:28.870
on the earth off, that you would have an
139
00:05:28.870 --> 00:05:31.470
experience probably comparable to what we get
140
00:05:31.470 --> 00:05:33.750
in coastal Australia. Whereas if you went
141
00:05:33.750 --> 00:05:35.430
deep into the inland and you got a really
142
00:05:35.430 --> 00:05:38.190
dark sky and be better if you then went
143
00:05:38.190 --> 00:05:40.630
to higher ground, like perhaps in Arizona,
144
00:05:40.630 --> 00:05:43.190
which I understand is a quite high altitude
145
00:05:43.190 --> 00:05:45.570
desert. If you're at higher altitude
146
00:05:46.370 --> 00:05:49.250
there is less air, so therefore there is
147
00:05:49.250 --> 00:05:52.250
less muck and you get a better sky. But
148
00:05:52.250 --> 00:05:53.850
that's balanced by the fact that if you're at
149
00:05:53.850 --> 00:05:55.530
high enough altitude, you're not getting as
150
00:05:55.530 --> 00:05:57.650
much oxygen and you don't see as effectively.
151
00:05:57.970 --> 00:05:59.849
So I've had stories from colleagues of mine
152
00:05:59.849 --> 00:06:01.650
who've been up to the great observatories,
153
00:06:02.220 --> 00:06:05.090
um, in the Andes, in Chile and also up
154
00:06:05.090 --> 00:06:07.250
in Hawaii who've gone out on a night and
155
00:06:07.250 --> 00:06:08.810
they've initially been quite disappointed
156
00:06:08.810 --> 00:06:10.450
that they didn't see a sky quite as
157
00:06:10.450 --> 00:06:12.120
expensive, as spectacular as they thought
158
00:06:12.120 --> 00:06:14.440
they would do. And people on Hawaii actually
159
00:06:14.440 --> 00:06:16.800
will often have a little bowl of oxygen and
160
00:06:16.800 --> 00:06:19.400
have an inhale to increase their blood oxygen
161
00:06:19.400 --> 00:06:21.880
levels, to increase the response of their
162
00:06:21.960 --> 00:06:24.480
eyes to counter the thinner atmosphere and
163
00:06:24.480 --> 00:06:26.280
then they get a really spectacular view.
164
00:06:26.360 --> 00:06:26.840
Andrew Dunkley: Wow.
165
00:06:27.000 --> 00:06:29.080
Jonti Horner: So, like most questions, there's a very
166
00:06:29.080 --> 00:06:31.560
simple answer which is as soon as the light
167
00:06:31.560 --> 00:06:34.160
goes out, you'll get a really good view, but
168
00:06:34.160 --> 00:06:36.640
that view will get better as your eyes adjust
169
00:06:36.640 --> 00:06:38.840
to the darkness. But how good of you you get
170
00:06:39.420 --> 00:06:41.180
is not just dependent on the light pollution,
171
00:06:41.180 --> 00:06:42.900
you'll start to bring in other effects. And
172
00:06:42.900 --> 00:06:45.660
my hope would be that the EMP burst and the
173
00:06:45.660 --> 00:06:47.820
end of all street lighting would happen at
174
00:06:47.820 --> 00:06:50.020
new moon rather than full moon. Because if
175
00:06:50.020 --> 00:06:52.380
you've got a full moon in the sky, all those
176
00:06:52.380 --> 00:06:54.940
effects of humidity and dust are exacerbated.
177
00:06:55.500 --> 00:06:57.180
And even with all the lights turned off, the
178
00:06:57.180 --> 00:06:58.500
night sky at full moon is a bit
179
00:06:58.500 --> 00:07:00.060
disappointing. You know, if I could do one
180
00:07:00.060 --> 00:07:01.620
astronomical thing as a kind of great
181
00:07:01.620 --> 00:07:04.140
celestial dictator, I get rid of the moon.
182
00:07:04.300 --> 00:07:05.980
It's just a pen in the backside. It's always
183
00:07:05.980 --> 00:07:07.820
in the way when I want to take photos and
184
00:07:07.900 --> 00:07:09.860
stops me seeing the more interesting things.
185
00:07:09.860 --> 00:07:12.840
It's like um, or lock it into a kind of one
186
00:07:12.840 --> 00:07:14.960
to one orbit with the Earth's orbit around
187
00:07:14.960 --> 00:07:16.640
the sun. So we only ever see it as a very
188
00:07:16.640 --> 00:07:18.360
thin crescent. So it can be beautiful in the
189
00:07:18.360 --> 00:07:20.160
early evening, then bugger off so I can see
190
00:07:20.160 --> 00:07:20.960
the prettier things.
191
00:07:21.200 --> 00:07:23.760
Andrew Dunkley: I can tell you why that's a problem. It's
192
00:07:23.760 --> 00:07:26.400
because everybody likes mooning in photos.
193
00:07:26.880 --> 00:07:27.840
Jonti Horner: Oh, totally.
194
00:07:29.360 --> 00:07:31.140
Andrew Dunkley: Uh, dear. Uh, um,
195
00:07:32.440 --> 00:07:34.400
um, I just thought about the
196
00:07:35.360 --> 00:07:38.060
physical effect of the light being
197
00:07:38.060 --> 00:07:40.940
turned off. But yeah, I didn't consider the
198
00:07:40.940 --> 00:07:43.460
atmosphere or the location or,
199
00:07:43.780 --> 00:07:46.700
um, or your eyes adjusting. I just had
200
00:07:46.700 --> 00:07:48.740
a look at that light pollution map website
201
00:07:48.820 --> 00:07:51.300
and I've honed in on Duo where I am
202
00:07:51.860 --> 00:07:54.580
now. If I just look at the nearest
203
00:07:54.580 --> 00:07:57.140
towns, yeah, I'd have to go just a bit over
204
00:07:57.140 --> 00:08:00.060
20km out of town to get to a
205
00:08:00.060 --> 00:08:02.580
dark sky area which is not too bad. But if,
206
00:08:02.580 --> 00:08:04.980
if you're in Sydney, forget it.
207
00:08:05.300 --> 00:08:07.060
You're gonna have to drive a few hours.
208
00:08:07.860 --> 00:08:10.500
Jonti Horner: But do yourself a favor and zoom out and then
209
00:08:10.500 --> 00:08:13.420
look at the eastern half of the US or look at
210
00:08:13.420 --> 00:08:15.820
eastern Asia and you'll see why we are so.
211
00:08:15.820 --> 00:08:18.740
Let's go. Yeah. That's why
212
00:08:18.740 --> 00:08:21.180
astro tourism's such a growing thing for us
213
00:08:21.180 --> 00:08:23.820
here in Australia. Because even in the big
214
00:08:23.820 --> 00:08:26.340
cities, you know, I moved to Sydney in 2010
215
00:08:26.740 --> 00:08:29.380
and lived very briefly in a
216
00:08:29.460 --> 00:08:31.900
hotel right in the center of Sydney, the most
217
00:08:31.900 --> 00:08:34.510
light polluted part. But I could still see
218
00:08:34.510 --> 00:08:36.430
the Milky Way from the roof of the hotel
219
00:08:37.070 --> 00:08:38.750
because our skies are so good. There's a
220
00:08:38.750 --> 00:08:40.180
couple of factors there. One is that, uh,
221
00:08:40.990 --> 00:08:42.870
Sydney itself puts out a lot of light, but
222
00:08:42.870 --> 00:08:44.470
there's not much else around. So if you're
223
00:08:44.470 --> 00:08:46.510
looking away from Sydney over towards the
224
00:08:46.510 --> 00:08:48.430
ocean, you're looking towards darker skies.
225
00:08:48.830 --> 00:08:51.270
So that helps. But the other thing is, and
226
00:08:51.270 --> 00:08:53.430
this ties into why we get sunburnt so easily
227
00:08:53.430 --> 00:08:55.950
in Australia, the air is just clearer.
228
00:08:56.510 --> 00:08:58.150
So I moved to Australia and everybody said,
229
00:08:58.150 --> 00:08:59.550
you're going to get burnt by the sun and it's
230
00:08:59.550 --> 00:09:02.010
awful. And my first thought was that's the
231
00:09:02.010 --> 00:09:04.450
ozone hole. Because I thought Australia was
232
00:09:04.450 --> 00:09:06.050
further south because I'm used to our
233
00:09:06.050 --> 00:09:09.050
corrupted maps that show the southern
234
00:09:09.050 --> 00:09:10.690
hemisphere wrong. And so Australia looks like
235
00:09:10.690 --> 00:09:12.130
it's near Antarctica and Australia is
236
00:09:12.130 --> 00:09:13.890
actually near the equator. It's. Yeah, it is.
237
00:09:14.130 --> 00:09:16.770
So it's not the ozone hole at all. But I told
238
00:09:16.770 --> 00:09:18.490
some people it's actually due to the fact
239
00:09:18.490 --> 00:09:21.210
that the air in Australia has a much lower
240
00:09:21.210 --> 00:09:23.730
amount of particulates in than any other
241
00:09:23.730 --> 00:09:26.250
continent to do with what's on the interior
242
00:09:26.250 --> 00:09:27.570
of the continent to do with the fact there's
243
00:09:27.570 --> 00:09:29.680
less pollution. So that means there's less to
244
00:09:29.680 --> 00:09:32.280
scatter the solar uv, which is why we get
245
00:09:32.280 --> 00:09:34.480
higher UV indices and therefore more sunburn.
246
00:09:34.480 --> 00:09:37.120
Um, so it's a quirk of geography rather than
247
00:09:37.120 --> 00:09:39.600
just lots of clear skies, which mean we get
248
00:09:39.600 --> 00:09:42.320
UV indices up to 13 or 14 on a hot
249
00:09:42.320 --> 00:09:45.160
summer's day and basically you fry to a crisp
250
00:09:45.160 --> 00:09:46.200
very, very quickly.
251
00:09:46.520 --> 00:09:48.220
What that means for astronomy though is that,
252
00:09:48.220 --> 00:09:50.480
uh, for a given place with a given, given
253
00:09:50.480 --> 00:09:53.400
amount of lighting, we actually get a better
254
00:09:53.400 --> 00:09:55.640
sky than we would do in other places because
255
00:09:55.640 --> 00:09:58.160
there's less to scatter that light. So that
256
00:09:58.160 --> 00:10:00.240
same amount of lighting has a slightly lower
257
00:10:00.240 --> 00:10:02.880
impact. Um, one of the story that ties into
258
00:10:02.880 --> 00:10:04.600
this that I always remember one of the big
259
00:10:04.600 --> 00:10:06.640
hurricanes probably 20 or 30 years ago
260
00:10:06.960 --> 00:10:09.040
knocked out the power across great swathes
261
00:10:09.040 --> 00:10:11.640
of, I think it was Florida. And many people
262
00:10:11.640 --> 00:10:13.519
saw the Milky Way for the very first time in
263
00:10:13.519 --> 00:10:15.240
their lives. And there was panic. People were
264
00:10:15.240 --> 00:10:17.600
actually calling up, uh, their local police.
265
00:10:17.680 --> 00:10:20.520
Oh, I remember this because they thought that
266
00:10:20.520 --> 00:10:22.440
the aliens were coming because the sky looked
267
00:10:22.440 --> 00:10:23.760
so weird and unusual because there were all
268
00:10:23.760 --> 00:10:25.400
these bright points of light in it and this
269
00:10:25.400 --> 00:10:28.210
weird milky glow going across the sky and ah,
270
00:10:28.220 --> 00:10:31.220
we laugh. But it tells you just how decoupled
271
00:10:31.220 --> 00:10:33.060
people are from something that's been so
272
00:10:33.380 --> 00:10:35.700
wonderfully culturally significant for all of
273
00:10:35.700 --> 00:10:37.700
our history. It's so important to the
274
00:10:37.700 --> 00:10:38.940
traditional owners of the land here in
275
00:10:38.940 --> 00:10:41.180
Australia, but also all around the world who
276
00:10:41.180 --> 00:10:42.980
have this deep and intimate connection to the
277
00:10:42.980 --> 00:10:45.540
night sky. And an event like that
278
00:10:46.180 --> 00:10:48.220
really drills home the damage we've done and
279
00:10:48.220 --> 00:10:51.100
how we've removed this. And I'm always
280
00:10:51.100 --> 00:10:53.700
amazed at the reluctance of people in kind of
281
00:10:53.700 --> 00:10:55.780
groups on social media to accept that light
282
00:10:55.780 --> 00:10:58.090
pollution is a problem because can lay odds
283
00:10:58.090 --> 00:10:59.930
at the same problem who say, don't be grumpy,
284
00:10:59.930 --> 00:11:02.370
we need our lights at night to see would be
285
00:11:02.370 --> 00:11:05.130
really, really unpleasantly happy if we have
286
00:11:05.130 --> 00:11:07.410
the same level of noise pollution. If they
287
00:11:07.410 --> 00:11:09.970
had their neighbors kicking out AC DC at 1am
288
00:11:09.970 --> 00:11:12.250
in the morning, they'd be kicking off to the
289
00:11:12.250 --> 00:11:14.490
council. And it seems that we view light
290
00:11:14.490 --> 00:11:17.090
pollution a lot less seriously than we view
291
00:11:17.410 --> 00:11:19.330
sound pollution or other forms of pollution.
292
00:11:19.330 --> 00:11:21.730
And that's changing a bit. But
293
00:11:22.370 --> 00:11:24.250
there's also an energy source side of it, I
294
00:11:24.250 --> 00:11:25.850
mean this is a bit that always makes my head
295
00:11:25.850 --> 00:11:27.770
hurt is if you're throwing 30% of your light
296
00:11:27.770 --> 00:11:30.570
up into the sky, you're wasting 30% of your
297
00:11:30.570 --> 00:11:32.290
electricity and you're therefore just burning
298
00:11:32.290 --> 00:11:35.090
money. And yeah, I'm sure the energy
299
00:11:35.090 --> 00:11:36.610
companies love that because they get bigger
300
00:11:36.610 --> 00:11:39.490
profits. But doesn't seem a very efficient
301
00:11:39.490 --> 00:11:40.410
way to do things.
302
00:11:40.570 --> 00:11:42.850
Andrew Dunkley: No. And when you look at the map, uh, Eastern
303
00:11:42.850 --> 00:11:44.690
United States, basically all the United
304
00:11:44.690 --> 00:11:46.570
States, but particularly the eastern half.
305
00:11:46.650 --> 00:11:49.290
Western Europe, uh, East Asia,
306
00:11:49.600 --> 00:11:52.380
um, and even the east, uh, eastern
307
00:11:52.380 --> 00:11:54.900
half of South America pretty well just
308
00:11:55.460 --> 00:11:58.260
light pollution. Central. Yeah. But you look
309
00:11:58.260 --> 00:12:00.440
at Australia and um,
310
00:12:00.900 --> 00:12:03.340
parts of North Africa, uh,
311
00:12:03.340 --> 00:12:05.539
Greenland, although it's an ice cap so it
312
00:12:05.539 --> 00:12:07.620
makes it a bit difficult. But uh, even the
313
00:12:07.680 --> 00:12:10.540
um, uh, big areas around Russia
314
00:12:10.540 --> 00:12:13.460
and Siberia, uh, complete darkness.
315
00:12:13.620 --> 00:12:16.510
Which is, you know, very good
316
00:12:16.510 --> 00:12:18.910
place to, to go if you. Well probably not
317
00:12:18.910 --> 00:12:21.230
Russia at the moment but um, good places to
318
00:12:21.230 --> 00:12:23.910
go to look at the sky and in terms of air
319
00:12:23.910 --> 00:12:26.390
quality. Um, they did a test a few years ago
320
00:12:26.390 --> 00:12:28.830
and found that the most pure air in the world
321
00:12:28.830 --> 00:12:31.590
crosses Tasmania and southern
322
00:12:31.590 --> 00:12:31.870
Australia.
323
00:12:33.070 --> 00:12:34.990
Jonti Horner: Which sounds about right. But it is why there
324
00:12:34.990 --> 00:12:37.870
is a growing interest in astro tourism
325
00:12:37.870 --> 00:12:39.830
in Australia. I've spoken to a few people
326
00:12:39.830 --> 00:12:42.480
about this in the last 12 months where local
327
00:12:42.480 --> 00:12:43.800
councils and
328
00:12:45.320 --> 00:12:47.480
different commercial groups are looking at
329
00:12:47.480 --> 00:12:49.960
adding astronomy activities to their
330
00:12:49.960 --> 00:12:52.320
offerings because they're aware that for
331
00:12:52.320 --> 00:12:55.120
people coming in from a lot of our places,
332
00:12:55.120 --> 00:12:57.280
um, that source tourists to Australia. These
333
00:12:57.280 --> 00:12:58.800
are people who've never seen the Milky Way,
334
00:12:58.800 --> 00:13:01.240
who've never seen the night sky properly. And
335
00:13:01.240 --> 00:13:03.800
to them it's this kind of romantic ideal that
336
00:13:03.960 --> 00:13:06.240
they could have a night lying under the stars
337
00:13:06.240 --> 00:13:09.240
and see the Milky Way above them. And that's
338
00:13:09.240 --> 00:13:10.640
just the reality here. You know, I step
339
00:13:10.640 --> 00:13:12.440
outside in my backyard and I see the Milky
340
00:13:12.440 --> 00:13:15.280
Way and that makes it a really big
341
00:13:15.280 --> 00:13:17.040
tourist drawer. And people are cottoning onto
342
00:13:17.040 --> 00:13:19.320
that. And that will then be extra ammunition
343
00:13:19.320 --> 00:13:21.160
for us improving lighting laws in Australia.
344
00:13:21.640 --> 00:13:23.160
Because there's an interest beyond just
345
00:13:23.160 --> 00:13:25.640
astronomers. There's a commercial interest to
346
00:13:25.640 --> 00:13:27.280
drive that. So I think it's a real positive
347
00:13:27.280 --> 00:13:29.360
thing. And um, yeah, we'll see more of it.
348
00:13:29.360 --> 00:13:32.360
But in the meantime, roll on the EMP purse.
349
00:13:33.160 --> 00:13:35.360
Andrew Dunkley: Yes, indeed. Uh, thanks for the question
350
00:13:35.360 --> 00:13:37.760
mark. See what you've done. Good, uh, to hear
351
00:13:37.760 --> 00:13:38.040
from.
352
00:13:40.900 --> 00:13:42.140
Jonti Horner: Roger. Your lab is right here.
353
00:13:42.140 --> 00:13:44.740
Andrew Dunkley: Also Space Nuts. This is Space Nuts with
354
00:13:44.740 --> 00:13:46.220
Andrew Dunkley and Jonti Horner.
355
00:13:46.220 --> 00:13:48.500
Our next question comes from
356
00:13:48.900 --> 00:13:50.340
Doug. It's an audio question.
357
00:13:50.420 --> 00:13:52.780
Speaker C: Hi Space Nuts, it's Doug and Hazel the
358
00:13:52.780 --> 00:13:55.420
Wonderdoodle calling again. Thank you for
359
00:13:55.420 --> 00:13:57.860
your responses to my previous questions.
360
00:13:58.180 --> 00:14:00.020
My question this time is about
361
00:14:00.740 --> 00:14:03.740
uh, blocking sunlight. Given that
362
00:14:03.740 --> 00:14:06.740
we as humanity have no ability to
363
00:14:06.740 --> 00:14:08.900
control our carbon emissions, it seems.
364
00:14:09.400 --> 00:14:12.290
Um, the next question is to me,
365
00:14:12.560 --> 00:14:14.450
uh, is geoengineering possible?
366
00:14:15.330 --> 00:14:18.250
Now, given that, uh, seed
367
00:14:18.250 --> 00:14:20.730
in the higher atmosphere with reflective
368
00:14:20.730 --> 00:14:23.410
particles would probably not go over too well
369
00:14:23.410 --> 00:14:25.970
with the, uh, chemtrails people.
370
00:14:26.530 --> 00:14:29.370
I'm going to suggest that, uh, putting
371
00:14:29.370 --> 00:14:32.130
some sort of sun blocker out at Lagrange
372
00:14:32.610 --> 00:14:35.290
point one, uh, would be
373
00:14:35.290 --> 00:14:38.290
a solution that would probably need to be
374
00:14:38.290 --> 00:14:40.650
investigated. Um, ChatGPT
375
00:14:40.810 --> 00:14:43.450
suggested that a 3 million square
376
00:14:43.450 --> 00:14:46.370
meter parasol, for lack of a better word,
377
00:14:46.370 --> 00:14:49.170
would block 1% of the sun's light
378
00:14:49.170 --> 00:14:51.490
hitting the Earth. Don't, um, know what the
379
00:14:51.490 --> 00:14:53.850
magic number is. Don't know if we should even
380
00:14:53.850 --> 00:14:56.410
do this. But the question I have is
381
00:14:56.970 --> 00:14:59.890
does anybody know about anybody working on
382
00:14:59.890 --> 00:15:02.340
this particular program right now
383
00:15:02.900 --> 00:15:05.380
as uh, a contingency? Thanks very much.
384
00:15:06.100 --> 00:15:06.900
Have a good day.
385
00:15:07.220 --> 00:15:09.140
Andrew Dunkley: You too, Doug. Thank you. And hello to Hazel
386
00:15:09.140 --> 00:15:12.140
the Wonder Doodle. Uh, this has come
387
00:15:12.140 --> 00:15:14.620
up before and I do think somebody has been
388
00:15:14.620 --> 00:15:17.380
looking into the possibility of putting a
389
00:15:17.380 --> 00:15:19.900
parasol in space to try and uh,
390
00:15:19.900 --> 00:15:22.740
shade Earth. Um, I
391
00:15:22.900 --> 00:15:24.580
just don't know how well it would work.
392
00:15:25.700 --> 00:15:28.090
Jonti Horner: It's a challenge. I mean it, it, the reason
393
00:15:28.090 --> 00:15:29.890
I'm chuckling a little bit in the background
394
00:15:29.890 --> 00:15:31.690
here is not actually about this idea, which I
395
00:15:31.690 --> 00:15:33.930
think is a good one. It's hazel the wind area
396
00:15:33.930 --> 00:15:34.530
as well, isn't it?
397
00:15:34.530 --> 00:15:35.450
Andrew Dunkley: That's what's making you chuckle.
398
00:15:35.450 --> 00:15:37.010
Jonti Horner: It's not even Hazel the Wonder Doodle. It
399
00:15:37.010 --> 00:15:39.250
just amuses me that on the one hand we're
400
00:15:39.250 --> 00:15:41.170
talking here about building parasols to
401
00:15:41.170 --> 00:15:43.729
shield the sun from the daytime sky, while at
402
00:15:43.729 --> 00:15:45.450
the same time a few weeks ago we talked about
403
00:15:45.450 --> 00:15:47.290
a group of idiots with a startup in
404
00:15:47.290 --> 00:15:49.010
California to reflect the sun to shine it on
405
00:15:49.010 --> 00:15:51.930
the night times. And I've got visions of
406
00:15:51.930 --> 00:15:53.370
the fact that you get these wonderful geo
407
00:15:53.370 --> 00:15:56.170
engineers deliberately shielding blocking
408
00:15:56.170 --> 00:15:58.010
sunlight from the daylight sky only to have
409
00:15:58.010 --> 00:15:59.810
their work undone by a group of equally
410
00:15:59.810 --> 00:16:02.370
stupid people shining, um, lights on the
411
00:16:02.370 --> 00:16:04.130
nighttime sky to just basically make the
412
00:16:04.130 --> 00:16:06.410
nights hotter and offset all of the good
413
00:16:06.410 --> 00:16:08.850
work. Um, but that's more me chuckling at the
414
00:16:08.850 --> 00:16:10.810
idiocy of reflector orbital than it is about
415
00:16:10.810 --> 00:16:12.010
this question. Because this is actually a
416
00:16:12.010 --> 00:16:14.290
really good question, Doug. It is
417
00:16:14.690 --> 00:16:17.650
abundantly clear, um, that.
418
00:16:17.810 --> 00:16:19.410
Okay, don't mind me. I just got a weird pop
419
00:16:19.410 --> 00:16:21.890
up saying I'm going to expire
420
00:16:22.260 --> 00:16:24.220
after 150 minutes of inactivity, which is
421
00:16:24.220 --> 00:16:25.980
never good. But I don't think that's to do
422
00:16:25.980 --> 00:16:27.780
with space nuts. So I've just moved my mouse
423
00:16:27.780 --> 00:16:30.460
and all is good. So I am not going wake spire
424
00:16:30.460 --> 00:16:32.260
live on air. This is good. Yeah.
425
00:16:32.420 --> 00:16:35.100
So there is fundamentally an issue that the
426
00:16:35.100 --> 00:16:37.540
planet is warming and the planet is warming
427
00:16:37.620 --> 00:16:40.100
because of human activities. And that is
428
00:16:41.060 --> 00:16:43.340
not open, uh, for dispute really anymore. I
429
00:16:43.340 --> 00:16:44.940
know that there are a variety of opinions
430
00:16:44.940 --> 00:16:46.300
available on this, but for me as an
431
00:16:46.300 --> 00:16:48.710
astronomer, the evidence is utterly
432
00:16:48.710 --> 00:16:51.110
overwhelming. And the only thing that can
433
00:16:51.110 --> 00:16:53.270
explain the changes that we're seeing, not
434
00:16:53.270 --> 00:16:55.270
the size of the changes, but the speed of the
435
00:16:55.270 --> 00:16:57.550
changes, is human activity. No
436
00:16:57.870 --> 00:17:00.710
physical process, other than perhaps a
437
00:17:00.710 --> 00:17:03.150
rock hitting the Earth and killing everybody,
438
00:17:03.450 --> 00:17:05.270
um, like the dinosaur level extinction, there
439
00:17:05.270 --> 00:17:07.870
is nothing else that could cause this rate of
440
00:17:07.870 --> 00:17:10.470
change. So it's very, very clear that human
441
00:17:10.470 --> 00:17:13.110
activity is the cause of this and, um, that
442
00:17:13.110 --> 00:17:14.950
there is some inertia in trying to persuade
443
00:17:14.950 --> 00:17:16.590
humans to stop doing the things that cause
444
00:17:16.590 --> 00:17:18.900
the problems and understand that. So there's
445
00:17:18.900 --> 00:17:21.500
a growing list of suggestions of ways that we
446
00:17:21.500 --> 00:17:23.700
could mitigate for climate change out there.
447
00:17:24.020 --> 00:17:26.980
One, as Doug said, is sprinkling reflective
448
00:17:26.980 --> 00:17:28.700
particles into the upper atmosphere to
449
00:17:28.700 --> 00:17:31.280
effectively increase the Earth's albedo, uh,
450
00:17:31.280 --> 00:17:33.380
which would mean more energy was reflected to
451
00:17:33.380 --> 00:17:35.260
space and less makes it down to the surface
452
00:17:35.260 --> 00:17:37.660
of the Earth to kind of heat the pressure
453
00:17:37.660 --> 00:17:40.460
cooker. And that could
454
00:17:40.460 --> 00:17:42.460
possibly work. It'll be interesting to see
455
00:17:42.460 --> 00:17:44.900
what role SpaceX plays in that in the years
456
00:17:44.900 --> 00:17:47.680
to come, because with all of the satellites
457
00:17:47.680 --> 00:17:50.190
they're launching, there's a growing, um,
458
00:17:50.190 --> 00:17:51.800
number of things returning to Earth and
459
00:17:51.800 --> 00:17:53.880
burning up in the upper atmosphere that are
460
00:17:53.880 --> 00:17:56.040
depositing metals like aluminum into the
461
00:17:56.040 --> 00:17:58.160
upper atmosphere. And nobody's really sure
462
00:17:58.160 --> 00:18:00.320
what's going to happen there. So that might
463
00:18:00.320 --> 00:18:02.760
actually inadvertently do exactly what Doug
464
00:18:02.760 --> 00:18:05.600
mentioned and increase the Earth's albedo
465
00:18:05.760 --> 00:18:08.040
and offset some climate change, or it might
466
00:18:08.040 --> 00:18:09.600
make it worse. People are still trying to
467
00:18:09.600 --> 00:18:11.590
figure out what's going to happen there. And
468
00:18:11.590 --> 00:18:13.910
that ties into the idea that space is still a
469
00:18:13.910 --> 00:18:16.190
little bit of the wild, Wild west, in that
470
00:18:16.190 --> 00:18:19.070
things are happening faster than legislation
471
00:18:19.070 --> 00:18:21.310
can adapt. You know, we've got tons of
472
00:18:21.310 --> 00:18:23.270
aluminium being added to the atmosphere and
473
00:18:23.270 --> 00:18:25.230
we don't know what it's going to do, but that
474
00:18:25.230 --> 00:18:27.990
might have part of this effect. But an
475
00:18:27.990 --> 00:18:30.710
obvious way that you could cool the Earth is
476
00:18:30.710 --> 00:18:33.190
by blocking some sunlight. Fundamentally,
477
00:18:33.190 --> 00:18:35.030
that makes sense. If you block 1% of the
478
00:18:35.030 --> 00:18:37.350
sun's light, you block 1% of the energy
479
00:18:37.350 --> 00:18:39.470
coming into the Earth, which will be about
480
00:18:39.470 --> 00:18:41.710
13.6 watts. The solar constant's about
481
00:18:41.710 --> 00:18:44.260
1360 watts per square meter. Block, uh,
482
00:18:44.510 --> 00:18:47.430
1% of that, that will be 13.6 watts,
483
00:18:47.430 --> 00:18:49.310
and that will be more than enough to offset
484
00:18:49.390 --> 00:18:52.390
climate change and probably more so. But
485
00:18:52.390 --> 00:18:54.589
let's say we wanted to block 1% of the light
486
00:18:54.589 --> 00:18:56.710
from the sun. That means you would need a
487
00:18:56.710 --> 00:18:59.670
parasol that is equal to 1% of the
488
00:18:59.670 --> 00:19:01.070
cross section of the Earth, Uh, if that
489
00:19:01.310 --> 00:19:03.590
parasol blocked all of the light from the sun
490
00:19:03.590 --> 00:19:05.870
that was hitting it. So that means
491
00:19:06.190 --> 00:19:08.790
1% of the Earth's surface would be dark. The
492
00:19:08.790 --> 00:19:11.550
sun wouldn't be falling on it. Or you diffuse
493
00:19:11.550 --> 00:19:14.110
that, and, um, you have 1% less light coming
494
00:19:14.110 --> 00:19:16.750
down. So if you do the maths of that. The
495
00:19:16.750 --> 00:19:19.390
Earth has a radius
496
00:19:19.550 --> 00:19:22.070
of about 6,378
497
00:19:22.070 --> 00:19:24.670
kilometers. That varies because the Earth's a
498
00:19:24.670 --> 00:19:26.910
bit ablate. So the radius from pole to pole
499
00:19:27.150 --> 00:19:29.590
is different to the radius across the
500
00:19:29.590 --> 00:19:31.750
equator. But we can use that as a mean
501
00:19:31.750 --> 00:19:34.710
radius. That means that the Earth, uh, has a
502
00:19:34.710 --> 00:19:37.710
surface area of about 10, 1.9,
503
00:19:37.710 --> 00:19:39.630
I think it was, times 10 to the 14
504
00:19:40.510 --> 00:19:43.150
meters squared. So to
505
00:19:43.150 --> 00:19:46.070
block 1% of the light, you'd need a
506
00:19:46.070 --> 00:19:49.030
parasol. That is 1% of that. So that would be
507
00:19:49.030 --> 00:19:51.910
about 1, um, point 28 times 10 to
508
00:19:51.910 --> 00:19:54.910
the 12 meters squared. Which means
509
00:19:54.910 --> 00:19:57.310
that you will need a parasol. I'm sorry,
510
00:19:57.310 --> 00:19:58.590
kilometers squared. I've done this
511
00:19:58.590 --> 00:20:01.110
calculation in kilometers, um, which would.
512
00:20:01.430 --> 00:20:03.510
No, that is in meters, sorry. Which would
513
00:20:03.510 --> 00:20:06.030
mean you'd need a parasol if you made it
514
00:20:06.030 --> 00:20:08.150
Square. That is
515
00:20:08.230 --> 00:20:10.990
1130 kilometers on a
516
00:20:10.990 --> 00:20:11.270
side
517
00:20:13.750 --> 00:20:16.710
that I think is technologically beyond us at
518
00:20:16.710 --> 00:20:19.190
the minute. Um, added to which,
519
00:20:19.590 --> 00:20:21.550
you know that the politicians would want us
520
00:20:21.550 --> 00:20:23.310
to mine that material on Earth and launch it
521
00:20:23.310 --> 00:20:25.340
because that would be more profitable. So the
522
00:20:25.340 --> 00:20:26.940
process of mining and launching all that
523
00:20:26.940 --> 00:20:29.700
material to build 1,000 kilometers on each
524
00:20:29.700 --> 00:20:32.340
side. Parasol Will probably put far more
525
00:20:32.420 --> 00:20:34.180
greenhouse gases into the atmosphere and
526
00:20:34.180 --> 00:20:36.540
exacerbate the problem. The other challenge
527
00:20:36.540 --> 00:20:38.300
you'd have with the parasol issue, though, is
528
00:20:38.300 --> 00:20:40.580
that the L1 point, which would be the obvious
529
00:20:40.580 --> 00:20:43.100
place to put it, that's a point between the
530
00:20:43.100 --> 00:20:45.460
Earth and the Sun. Where an object would
531
00:20:45.460 --> 00:20:47.340
rotate at the same orbital period as the
532
00:20:47.340 --> 00:20:49.420
Earth. And, um, be in this kind of semi
533
00:20:49.420 --> 00:20:51.100
stable location. That's where a lot of our
534
00:20:51.100 --> 00:20:53.700
solar observation spacecraft go, like soho,
535
00:20:53.910 --> 00:20:55.590
to give us early warning of space weather.
536
00:20:56.150 --> 00:20:59.110
Now, the L1 point is about 1.5 million
537
00:20:59.110 --> 00:21:01.750
kilometers away. Things at
538
00:21:01.750 --> 00:21:04.150
L1 are not fully stable. So they need rockets
539
00:21:04.150 --> 00:21:05.990
and actuators to keep them on point. Because
540
00:21:05.990 --> 00:21:08.270
if they drift too far away, they'll fall out
541
00:21:08.270 --> 00:21:10.830
of the stable area and go off orbiting the
542
00:21:10.830 --> 00:21:13.350
sun on the rock. So what you need to do is
543
00:21:13.350 --> 00:21:16.310
have an object 1,000 kilometers on each
544
00:21:16.310 --> 00:21:18.790
side. Located one and a half million
545
00:21:18.790 --> 00:21:21.440
kilometers away. That could be positioned
546
00:21:21.440 --> 00:21:23.680
accurately enough that the shadow it casts
547
00:21:23.760 --> 00:21:26.680
hits a target 6,300 km
548
00:21:26.680 --> 00:21:29.120
in radius rather than missing us. So as it
549
00:21:29.120 --> 00:21:31.200
drifts around, we'd have to keep it on point
550
00:21:31.680 --> 00:21:33.720
to an accuracy of just a few hundred
551
00:21:33.720 --> 00:21:36.119
kilometers. And so this is one of those
552
00:21:36.119 --> 00:21:38.000
things where it's a fabulous idea for science
553
00:21:38.000 --> 00:21:40.440
fiction and it is the kind of thing where we
554
00:21:40.440 --> 00:21:42.760
can imagine all of the steps we need to take
555
00:21:42.760 --> 00:21:44.920
to make it work. So it's within the bounds of
556
00:21:44.920 --> 00:21:47.860
our technology in terms of our ability to
557
00:21:47.860 --> 00:21:50.660
make stuff, but it's the scale of it that
558
00:21:50.660 --> 00:21:53.580
makes it impractical. And that's why a
559
00:21:53.580 --> 00:21:56.020
lot of these ideas of parasols
560
00:21:56.420 --> 00:21:59.180
fall down, is that the amount of area
561
00:21:59.180 --> 00:22:01.140
you'd have to cover to block enough light to
562
00:22:01.140 --> 00:22:03.780
make it feasible are so huge that it's just
563
00:22:03.780 --> 00:22:06.460
technologically the building of them and the
564
00:22:06.460 --> 00:22:08.180
keeping them on point will be too much of a
565
00:22:08.180 --> 00:22:10.780
challenge. It be a global endeavor that would
566
00:22:10.780 --> 00:22:13.700
make the efforts for the Apollo missions seem
567
00:22:13.700 --> 00:22:16.140
like tiny little small fry in comparison.
568
00:22:16.540 --> 00:22:18.940
I don't know if anybody's ever done a
569
00:22:18.940 --> 00:22:21.420
calculation of the cost that this would have.
570
00:22:22.050 --> 00:22:23.420
Um, but I suspect there are other
571
00:22:23.420 --> 00:22:26.100
geoengineering ideas that will be more
572
00:22:26.100 --> 00:22:28.160
financially feasible. Uh,
573
00:22:29.340 --> 00:22:31.260
I'm always an optimist. I mean, I am very
574
00:22:31.260 --> 00:22:32.940
worried, like everybody is, about climate
575
00:22:32.940 --> 00:22:35.140
change. I have been since I was a kid. I've
576
00:22:35.140 --> 00:22:38.140
lived in places where it is writ large on
577
00:22:38.140 --> 00:22:39.820
the landscape. I always talk about when I
578
00:22:39.820 --> 00:22:41.180
lived in Switzerland, and they've got
579
00:22:41.180 --> 00:22:43.550
photographs from mid summer, uh, in all these
580
00:22:43.550 --> 00:22:45.870
little Alpine villages of the glacier just
581
00:22:45.870 --> 00:22:47.830
behind the village. Evening, midsummer. And
582
00:22:47.830 --> 00:22:49.430
then you step outside and you can't see the
583
00:22:49.430 --> 00:22:51.230
glacier because it's retreated so far up the
584
00:22:51.230 --> 00:22:53.950
mountains it's no longer in view. So I've
585
00:22:53.950 --> 00:22:56.550
lived in places where it's obvious. But I'm
586
00:22:56.550 --> 00:22:58.670
always of the idea that eventually human
587
00:22:58.670 --> 00:23:01.560
ingenuity and commercial, um,
588
00:23:01.560 --> 00:23:03.630
interests will get to the point where it is
589
00:23:04.110 --> 00:23:06.030
something we'll solve. And I think we're
590
00:23:06.030 --> 00:23:07.950
seeing that a bit now with electric cars.
591
00:23:07.950 --> 00:23:10.330
We've had the technology to have electric
592
00:23:10.330 --> 00:23:12.490
vehicles for more than 100 years. I remember
593
00:23:12.570 --> 00:23:14.730
getting milk delivered by the milkman as a
594
00:23:14.730 --> 00:23:16.210
kid. And, uh, they were going around in
595
00:23:16.210 --> 00:23:18.130
electric milk carts, you know, so we have
596
00:23:18.130 --> 00:23:21.090
that technology even then. But for a long
597
00:23:21.090 --> 00:23:22.970
time nobody's had electric cars, nobody's
598
00:23:22.970 --> 00:23:25.250
considered it solvable. But eventually the
599
00:23:25.250 --> 00:23:26.650
costs have dropped enough that they're a
600
00:23:26.650 --> 00:23:28.370
viable alternative and now people are taking
601
00:23:28.370 --> 00:23:30.410
them up. So you're seeing a drop in the
602
00:23:30.410 --> 00:23:32.890
number of petrol vehicles. And I'd like to
603
00:23:32.890 --> 00:23:35.130
think that because a lot of the things that
604
00:23:35.130 --> 00:23:37.010
we do to cause climate change are
605
00:23:37.010 --> 00:23:39.440
fundamentally inefficient, as our technology
606
00:23:39.600 --> 00:23:42.120
improves, we'll move to much more
607
00:23:42.120 --> 00:23:44.320
efficient processes that generate less of the
608
00:23:44.320 --> 00:23:46.600
things that cause climate change. And, uh, we
609
00:23:46.600 --> 00:23:48.360
will find a solution. But the problem is the
610
00:23:48.360 --> 00:23:50.920
lag time is such that the longer we wait, the
611
00:23:50.920 --> 00:23:52.760
worse it's going to get before it gets better
612
00:23:52.760 --> 00:23:54.880
again. And there are some suggestions that,
613
00:23:54.880 --> 00:23:57.120
for example, the horrendous hurricane that
614
00:23:57.360 --> 00:24:00.320
hit Jamaica last week was significantly
615
00:24:00.320 --> 00:24:02.000
worse because of the effect of climate change
616
00:24:02.000 --> 00:24:03.920
on the temperatures of the water. There's now
617
00:24:03.920 --> 00:24:06.160
actually a whole branch of mathematical
618
00:24:06.160 --> 00:24:08.730
science that delves into
619
00:24:09.690 --> 00:24:12.530
calculating not a yes, no did climate change
620
00:24:12.530 --> 00:24:15.450
cause this event, but rather a statistical
621
00:24:15.450 --> 00:24:18.130
analysis of how much worse was this
622
00:24:18.130 --> 00:24:20.930
event as a result of the effects of climate
623
00:24:20.930 --> 00:24:22.970
change. And I think the numbers for that
624
00:24:22.970 --> 00:24:25.930
hurricane last week were quite startling
625
00:24:25.930 --> 00:24:28.570
that it was made noticeably worse because of
626
00:24:28.570 --> 00:24:30.130
the increased heating of the ocean and all
627
00:24:30.130 --> 00:24:32.170
the rest of it. Yeah, it is a real problem
628
00:24:32.170 --> 00:24:34.140
with. We want to get solutions, but I think
629
00:24:34.140 --> 00:24:35.940
the parasol is a bit too hard.
630
00:24:36.020 --> 00:24:38.420
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah, I did read the science behind why that
631
00:24:38.420 --> 00:24:40.860
storm was so severe and it was quite an
632
00:24:40.860 --> 00:24:42.660
interesting read. And I won't go into it now
633
00:24:42.660 --> 00:24:44.260
because I probably get half of it wrong.
634
00:24:44.260 --> 00:24:47.220
But, um, you might also be interested,
635
00:24:47.220 --> 00:24:49.620
Doug, to know that there have been some
636
00:24:49.860 --> 00:24:52.340
researchers looking into this. Not just
637
00:24:53.140 --> 00:24:56.100
maybe a single object in space to,
638
00:24:56.500 --> 00:24:59.260
to block the sun. But University, uh, of
639
00:24:59.260 --> 00:25:01.700
Arizona was looking at a, uh, cloud of small
640
00:25:02.080 --> 00:25:04.560
spacecraft. Uh, there was another research,
641
00:25:05.310 --> 00:25:08.150
uh, effort at mit, uh,
642
00:25:08.150 --> 00:25:10.930
looking at inflatable space bubbles. Uh,
643
00:25:10.930 --> 00:25:13.600
another idea out of the University of Hawaii,
644
00:25:13.810 --> 00:25:16.520
um, tethering shades to an asteroid. The
645
00:25:16.520 --> 00:25:18.320
asteroid being used as a counterweight if
646
00:25:18.320 --> 00:25:19.680
they could capture one. That's another
647
00:25:20.240 --> 00:25:22.480
impossible dream at the moment. Solar sails
648
00:25:22.480 --> 00:25:24.800
and lightweight films and, and even one,
649
00:25:25.590 --> 00:25:27.760
uh, proposed only a couple of years ago was,
650
00:25:27.850 --> 00:25:30.780
um, to start ejecting lunar
651
00:25:30.780 --> 00:25:33.220
dust into space to create
652
00:25:33.940 --> 00:25:36.710
a dust cloud to block the sun. M.
653
00:25:36.710 --> 00:25:39.660
My worry is if we do decide
654
00:25:39.660 --> 00:25:41.740
that that's the solution and we do it and
655
00:25:41.740 --> 00:25:44.180
then we solve the problem of global warming,
656
00:25:45.060 --> 00:25:47.140
won't we then put ourselves in a position
657
00:25:47.220 --> 00:25:50.180
where we could cause, uh, a global
658
00:25:50.180 --> 00:25:50.740
winter?
659
00:25:51.810 --> 00:25:51.970
Jonti Horner: Um.
660
00:25:54.910 --> 00:25:56.990
Andrew Dunkley: Even if we reach a point where we've got the
661
00:25:56.990 --> 00:25:59.710
technology to solve the problem, as
662
00:25:59.710 --> 00:26:01.470
Doug said, should we do it?
663
00:26:01.950 --> 00:26:04.270
Jonti Horner: And we also come to
664
00:26:04.910 --> 00:26:06.670
really interesting questions because
665
00:26:07.150 --> 00:26:10.050
underlying the climate change we've got, um,
666
00:26:10.050 --> 00:26:12.230
there's also the fact that the Earth's, uh,
667
00:26:12.230 --> 00:26:14.110
climate changes naturally on much longer
668
00:26:14.110 --> 00:26:15.430
timescales. We get the glacial and
669
00:26:15.430 --> 00:26:18.310
interglacial periods. So if we ever do get to
670
00:26:18.310 --> 00:26:20.350
the point where we've got climate control,
671
00:26:20.510 --> 00:26:23.510
so. So in other words, we can set the Earth's
672
00:26:23.510 --> 00:26:25.630
climate to be. At a certain point we can fix
673
00:26:25.630 --> 00:26:27.750
a problem. And if we can fix a problem, we
674
00:26:27.750 --> 00:26:29.430
can then say where we want the climate to
675
00:26:29.430 --> 00:26:31.630
sit. What do we choose? Do we allow
676
00:26:32.190 --> 00:26:34.310
that very slow pace of climate change to
677
00:26:34.310 --> 00:26:36.749
happen? Do we figure out the conditions that
678
00:26:36.749 --> 00:26:39.710
are optimal and set it there? There's
679
00:26:39.710 --> 00:26:41.270
a lot of really interesting stuff that would
680
00:26:41.270 --> 00:26:42.910
feed into science fiction rather than science
681
00:26:42.910 --> 00:26:44.590
fact that come from the fact that if you've
682
00:26:44.590 --> 00:26:45.830
got to the point where you can solve the
683
00:26:45.830 --> 00:26:47.890
problem, you've got to the point where you
684
00:26:47.890 --> 00:26:50.130
can geoengineer the Earth's climate to suit.
685
00:26:50.850 --> 00:26:52.850
So where do you therefore set the sweet spot?
686
00:26:52.850 --> 00:26:55.570
Do you set it at uh, the year 2000 mean, the
687
00:26:55.570 --> 00:26:58.330
1900 mean? Do you make it a little bit
688
00:26:58.330 --> 00:26:59.770
cooler than that? Do you make it a little bit
689
00:26:59.770 --> 00:27:01.690
warmer than that? It's a really interesting
690
00:27:01.690 --> 00:27:04.130
one. Which for an incredibly complex and
691
00:27:04.130 --> 00:27:06.810
chaotic system, um, would lead to a lot of
692
00:27:06.810 --> 00:27:09.010
implications about weather disasters and all
693
00:27:09.010 --> 00:27:11.210
the rest of it. Yeah, there's a lot of
694
00:27:11.210 --> 00:27:12.530
interesting stuff there. I think it's going
695
00:27:12.530 --> 00:27:14.050
to be interesting times for the next hundred
696
00:27:14.050 --> 00:27:16.690
or two hundred years as humanity tries to
697
00:27:16.690 --> 00:27:17.930
solve the problems it's made.
698
00:27:18.730 --> 00:27:21.010
Andrew Dunkley: Indeed. Yes. Thank you Doug, Great to hear
699
00:27:21.010 --> 00:27:23.050
from you. Keep them coming. There's some
700
00:27:23.050 --> 00:27:25.490
terrific ideas out there that uh, people want
701
00:27:25.490 --> 00:27:28.490
to learn more about. And this is
702
00:27:28.490 --> 00:27:31.489
Space Nuts with Andrew Dunkley and Jonti
703
00:27:31.489 --> 00:27:32.090
Horner.
704
00:27:36.490 --> 00:27:37.530
Space Nuts.
705
00:27:37.690 --> 00:27:40.170
Our next question, uh, comes from another
706
00:27:40.250 --> 00:27:42.650
YouTuber. Uh, and
707
00:27:42.870 --> 00:27:45.650
uh, the question is who has the salvage
708
00:27:45.650 --> 00:27:48.650
rights on all the scrap satellites and is
709
00:27:48.650 --> 00:27:51.490
there a plan or a uh, map of all the
710
00:27:51.490 --> 00:27:54.130
defunct scrap in orbit? Possibly in the
711
00:27:54.130 --> 00:27:56.490
future there would be good business in
712
00:27:56.490 --> 00:27:58.610
recovering all the precious metals, et
713
00:27:58.610 --> 00:28:00.610
cetera. It's a good question. I know they
714
00:28:00.610 --> 00:28:02.810
were experimenting with different ways of
715
00:28:02.890 --> 00:28:05.860
bringing down defunct satellites, uh,
716
00:28:06.330 --> 00:28:08.610
and all they were doing was like testing
717
00:28:08.610 --> 00:28:11.500
harpoons and things like that or whatever to
718
00:28:11.500 --> 00:28:14.300
make them re enter and burn up. But this is,
719
00:28:14.380 --> 00:28:17.020
this is um, a whole new ball game. Salvage.
720
00:28:17.550 --> 00:28:19.940
Uh, I don't, I haven't heard of it.
721
00:28:19.940 --> 00:28:22.780
Jonti Horner: Have you? It's yet
722
00:28:22.780 --> 00:28:25.580
another area where legislation is not keeping
723
00:28:25.580 --> 00:28:28.540
up with use. So there's a
724
00:28:28.540 --> 00:28:30.940
lot of challenges with this. Space is vastly
725
00:28:30.940 --> 00:28:32.740
big and um, the things we put up there are
726
00:28:32.740 --> 00:28:34.540
very small compared to the size of the space
727
00:28:34.540 --> 00:28:37.270
that's up there. There are a lot of efforts
728
00:28:37.270 --> 00:28:39.750
going on to map and to keep track of all of
729
00:28:39.750 --> 00:28:42.590
the bits of debris, both large scale like
730
00:28:42.590 --> 00:28:44.830
satellites and former rocket bodies, down to
731
00:28:44.830 --> 00:28:46.350
the very small fragments you've got out
732
00:28:46.350 --> 00:28:48.870
there. And that's the whole Area of space,
733
00:28:48.870 --> 00:28:50.670
situational awareness. There's telescopes
734
00:28:50.670 --> 00:28:52.750
around the world tracking debris, keeping it
735
00:28:52.750 --> 00:28:55.750
in databases. And the thing there is
736
00:28:55.750 --> 00:28:57.430
that you can't just assume that once you've
737
00:28:57.430 --> 00:28:58.790
seen it, you know what it's orbit is and
738
00:28:58.790 --> 00:29:00.790
you'll know where it is forevermore, because
739
00:29:00.790 --> 00:29:02.550
it's a complex environment where the Earth's
740
00:29:02.550 --> 00:29:04.230
atmosphere is breathing in and out, getting
741
00:29:04.230 --> 00:29:06.190
bigger and smaller, and the solar wind is
742
00:29:06.190 --> 00:29:08.460
varying. And all these things that happen,
743
00:29:08.460 --> 00:29:11.420
even down to the subtleties of the varying
744
00:29:11.420 --> 00:29:13.500
densities of different parts of the Earth's
745
00:29:13.500 --> 00:29:15.460
surface, causing slight changes in the
746
00:29:15.460 --> 00:29:17.740
Earth's gravity at, uh, the kind of level you
747
00:29:17.740 --> 00:29:19.820
want to track these things, all of that means
748
00:29:19.820 --> 00:29:21.100
that you need to keep tracking them. You
749
00:29:21.100 --> 00:29:22.660
can't just find them once and say it's there
750
00:29:22.660 --> 00:29:25.060
and that's it. So there's a whole burgeoning
751
00:29:25.060 --> 00:29:26.980
kind of research industry built around
752
00:29:27.460 --> 00:29:29.660
tracking this debris, using laser range
753
00:29:29.660 --> 00:29:31.580
finding to get as accurate a position as
754
00:29:31.580 --> 00:29:34.030
possible. And part of the reason for that is
755
00:29:34.030 --> 00:29:36.590
so that things like expensive satellites and
756
00:29:36.590 --> 00:29:38.750
the space station can dodge when there's a
757
00:29:38.750 --> 00:29:40.910
chance of an impact. That's always helpful.
758
00:29:41.430 --> 00:29:43.550
Um, it is also just so that we were aware of
759
00:29:43.550 --> 00:29:44.990
what's up there, and it's a problem that's
760
00:29:44.990 --> 00:29:46.550
only going to get worse. Now, I did a little
761
00:29:46.550 --> 00:29:49.510
bit of searching around because I had never
762
00:29:49.510 --> 00:29:52.390
thought of the salvage of
763
00:29:52.390 --> 00:29:55.230
satellites and stuff like that as being a
764
00:29:55.230 --> 00:29:58.150
thing. Now, in maritime
765
00:29:58.150 --> 00:30:00.430
law, there's this concept of the right to
766
00:30:00.430 --> 00:30:02.350
salvage, which is when something is becoming
767
00:30:02.350 --> 00:30:05.170
dangerous or when it's out, which allows
768
00:30:05.170 --> 00:30:07.930
people to claim salvage rights. There is no
769
00:30:07.930 --> 00:30:09.970
such thing in space. I found a few articles
770
00:30:09.970 --> 00:30:12.250
that all confirm that. And I quote from an
771
00:30:12.250 --> 00:30:15.050
article in the spacereview.com, there is no
772
00:30:15.050 --> 00:30:17.250
right of salvage analogous to the right found
773
00:30:17.250 --> 00:30:19.570
in maritime law. Which means that even though
774
00:30:19.570 --> 00:30:21.490
a satellite or some other space object may
775
00:30:21.490 --> 00:30:24.050
not be functioning, that does not imply that
776
00:30:24.050 --> 00:30:26.250
it has been abandoned by the nation that
777
00:30:26.250 --> 00:30:29.010
launched it. And there's a pretty lengthy
778
00:30:29.010 --> 00:30:31.090
spiel following that which basically says, if
779
00:30:31.090 --> 00:30:32.930
you don't have concept for the nation that
780
00:30:32.930 --> 00:30:35.490
launched and operated that thing, you're not
781
00:30:35.490 --> 00:30:37.250
allowed to dispose of it or interfere with
782
00:30:37.250 --> 00:30:37.530
it.
783
00:30:38.730 --> 00:30:41.610
Andrew Dunkley: In fact, uh, I might just add a caveat to
784
00:30:41.610 --> 00:30:43.770
that. Uh, if you launch something into space,
785
00:30:43.770 --> 00:30:45.050
it is your responsibility.
786
00:30:45.290 --> 00:30:48.250
Jonti Horner: Yes, absolutely. Which follows on to the
787
00:30:48.250 --> 00:30:50.970
next point. That's the issue about salvaging
788
00:30:50.970 --> 00:30:53.170
it while it is still in space. And, um, I
789
00:30:53.170 --> 00:30:55.930
could imagine that with sufficiently future
790
00:30:56.090 --> 00:30:58.410
technology and a more crowded environment
791
00:30:58.490 --> 00:31:00.210
around space, there could be a commercial
792
00:31:00.210 --> 00:31:02.490
opportunity for somebody to develop Yeah, a
793
00:31:02.490 --> 00:31:05.090
cleanup crew, which companies
794
00:31:05.250 --> 00:31:08.090
who own a satellite can pay to
795
00:31:08.090 --> 00:31:09.930
recover their satellite and dispose of it
796
00:31:09.930 --> 00:31:12.730
safely or to give harvesting rights or
797
00:31:12.730 --> 00:31:14.730
whatever, where that's dealt with. I could
798
00:31:14.730 --> 00:31:16.530
see that as a commercial thing down the line.
799
00:31:16.770 --> 00:31:18.890
But it also has an impact on what happens
800
00:31:18.890 --> 00:31:21.890
when satellites fall back to Earth. Should
801
00:31:21.890 --> 00:31:23.370
they make it through the Earth's atmosphere
802
00:31:23.370 --> 00:31:25.050
intact and make it to the surface of the
803
00:31:25.050 --> 00:31:27.530
Earth, as we saw with Skylab In Australia in
804
00:31:27.530 --> 00:31:30.410
1973, for example, um, and more
805
00:31:30.410 --> 00:31:33.330
recently with fragments of SpaceX debris
806
00:31:33.330 --> 00:31:36.090
littering the planet, you might think that if
807
00:31:36.090 --> 00:31:38.450
it falls in your backyard, it's yours, but it
808
00:31:38.450 --> 00:31:41.170
isn't. The ownership remains with the people
809
00:31:41.170 --> 00:31:44.010
or the country that launched it. And so
810
00:31:44.250 --> 00:31:47.130
back when Skylab, um, landed in Western
811
00:31:47.130 --> 00:31:49.730
Australia, the area in Western Australia
812
00:31:49.730 --> 00:31:52.130
where it landed cheekily sent NASA a
813
00:31:52.130 --> 00:31:55.130
littering notice for a fine, which got paid,
814
00:31:55.510 --> 00:31:57.630
um, which was quite good fun a few years ago
815
00:31:57.630 --> 00:32:00.350
when large pieces of SpaceX rocket landed in
816
00:32:00.350 --> 00:32:01.750
the Snowy Mountains in Australia.
817
00:32:02.150 --> 00:32:02.590
Andrew Dunkley: Yes.
818
00:32:02.590 --> 00:32:04.430
Jonti Horner: People were advised not to pick the bits up
819
00:32:04.430 --> 00:32:06.350
and collect them to let the Australian Space
820
00:32:06.350 --> 00:32:09.190
Agency know, because technically,
821
00:32:09.190 --> 00:32:11.950
the space agency has a whole plan. And this
822
00:32:11.950 --> 00:32:13.910
is laid out on the space agency website under
823
00:32:13.910 --> 00:32:15.430
space.govau
824
00:32:16.150 --> 00:32:18.150
discovery of space
825
00:32:18.550 --> 00:32:21.540
debris in Australia. So
826
00:32:21.540 --> 00:32:24.180
space.govau discovery of space
827
00:32:24.180 --> 00:32:26.780
debris in Australia details
828
00:32:26.940 --> 00:32:29.620
the regulatory side of things and what the
829
00:32:29.620 --> 00:32:32.300
space agency does, and says the Australian
830
00:32:32.300 --> 00:32:33.860
government has plans in place for events
831
00:32:33.860 --> 00:32:35.420
where space debris impacts Australia.
832
00:32:36.060 --> 00:32:37.700
Description of what it is and what the role
833
00:32:37.700 --> 00:32:39.500
is, and it lays out the steps that if you
834
00:32:39.500 --> 00:32:41.540
find space debris in your backyard, you
835
00:32:41.540 --> 00:32:44.540
should follow. Step one is do not touch it.
836
00:32:44.700 --> 00:32:46.660
And I cannot stress this enough, do not touch
837
00:32:46.660 --> 00:32:48.970
it. Space objects are built from materials
838
00:32:48.970 --> 00:32:51.330
that can be hazardous. This is exacerbated by
839
00:32:51.330 --> 00:32:52.450
coming back through the atmosphere and
840
00:32:52.450 --> 00:32:55.050
getting damaged. So it says space debris
841
00:32:55.050 --> 00:32:56.530
should only be handled by appropriately
842
00:32:56.530 --> 00:32:59.370
trained and equipped professionals. That was
843
00:32:59.370 --> 00:33:01.330
particularly relevant with the fragments of
844
00:33:01.330 --> 00:33:03.330
the SpaceX rocket that fell near the Turks
845
00:33:03.330 --> 00:33:05.410
and Caicos Islands earlier this year, because
846
00:33:05.410 --> 00:33:07.450
there was a whole brouhaha about the cleanup
847
00:33:07.450 --> 00:33:10.090
and SpaceX was not following its requirements
848
00:33:10.090 --> 00:33:12.650
and not doing much, and people were upset and
849
00:33:12.650 --> 00:33:14.170
some people had been going and collecting
850
00:33:14.170 --> 00:33:15.730
bits of debris and there was a risk they'd
851
00:33:15.730 --> 00:33:18.130
fall ill and stuff like this. So, step one,
852
00:33:18.130 --> 00:33:20.970
don't touch it. Step two, contact your local
853
00:33:20.970 --> 00:33:23.530
authorities. So, um, if the situation is
854
00:33:23.530 --> 00:33:25.410
urgent, contact triple zero. So I guess
855
00:33:25.410 --> 00:33:27.450
that's if a piece of a SpaceX satellite hits
856
00:33:27.450 --> 00:33:30.250
your Tesla, don't contact the museum, call
857
00:33:30.250 --> 00:33:32.930
the police. Fair enough. Otherwise, call the
858
00:33:32.930 --> 00:33:34.930
police assistant line. So you get some advice
859
00:33:35.010 --> 00:33:37.930
and Then you notify the space agency. And
860
00:33:37.930 --> 00:33:40.610
what the space agency then has to do is
861
00:33:40.610 --> 00:33:43.550
figure out whose bit of debris it is, get in
862
00:33:43.550 --> 00:33:45.430
touch with them, um, and liaise with them
863
00:33:45.670 --> 00:33:47.550
because there is a requirement for us to
864
00:33:47.550 --> 00:33:50.070
return the material to them. It is their
865
00:33:50.070 --> 00:33:52.550
property. And um, so from
866
00:33:52.550 --> 00:33:55.110
salvaging here on Earth you don't have those
867
00:33:55.110 --> 00:33:57.350
salvage laws because even if it's a burnt up
868
00:33:57.350 --> 00:33:59.630
fragment of rocket, it's still property of
869
00:33:59.630 --> 00:34:01.630
SpaceX or it's still property of the Chinese
870
00:34:01.630 --> 00:34:04.230
government. And so we don't have that kind of
871
00:34:04.230 --> 00:34:06.230
salvage set up at the minute. There's a
872
00:34:06.230 --> 00:34:08.110
description of what happens once debris is
873
00:34:08.110 --> 00:34:10.030
identified as space debris. And it says if an
874
00:34:10.030 --> 00:34:12.230
item is confirmed as space debris, the
875
00:34:12.230 --> 00:34:14.190
Australian government has international
876
00:34:14.350 --> 00:34:16.830
obligations to notify the launching authority
877
00:34:16.990 --> 00:34:19.670
of the discovery and upon request may be
878
00:34:19.670 --> 00:34:22.430
required to return the debris. So you
879
00:34:22.430 --> 00:34:24.590
can't salvage it. Now this
880
00:34:25.470 --> 00:34:28.109
may become something where the laws evolve in
881
00:34:28.109 --> 00:34:30.700
the years to come. As I say all the time our
882
00:34:30.700 --> 00:34:32.670
uh, user space is still in this Wild west
883
00:34:32.670 --> 00:34:35.470
phase where our ability to do stuff is
884
00:34:35.470 --> 00:34:37.750
growing much more rapidly than our ability to
885
00:34:37.750 --> 00:34:39.959
legislate for it. Um, and there's a lot of
886
00:34:39.959 --> 00:34:41.799
commercial interest in not advancing the
887
00:34:41.799 --> 00:34:44.599
legislation because if you advance the
888
00:34:44.599 --> 00:34:46.239
legislation you put more costs on the
889
00:34:46.239 --> 00:34:47.959
commercial entities. So they have a vested
890
00:34:47.959 --> 00:34:50.799
interest in not having legislation about
891
00:34:50.799 --> 00:34:52.919
launches, not legislating for the number you
892
00:34:52.919 --> 00:34:54.799
can make or the environmental requirements.
893
00:34:55.359 --> 00:34:57.679
And countries are leery of doing it because
894
00:34:57.679 --> 00:34:59.559
you can launch the space from all over the
895
00:34:59.559 --> 00:35:01.919
globe. So if you say to uh, SpaceX,
896
00:35:02.479 --> 00:35:04.879
you need to meet all these punishing
897
00:35:04.879 --> 00:35:06.719
environmental conditions before you launch
898
00:35:06.719 --> 00:35:07.959
and you've got to do all this with your
899
00:35:07.959 --> 00:35:10.050
satellites, SpaceX can easily say, well
900
00:35:10.050 --> 00:35:11.650
that's fine, we'll take our investment and
901
00:35:11.650 --> 00:35:14.010
move it to another country. So there's a lot
902
00:35:14.010 --> 00:35:16.730
of challenges there. But I could imagine in
903
00:35:16.730 --> 00:35:18.690
decades to come, as commercial space becomes
904
00:35:18.690 --> 00:35:20.690
more established and our use of space becomes
905
00:35:20.690 --> 00:35:23.090
much more varied and much more numerous,
906
00:35:23.490 --> 00:35:25.610
a astronomers will complain because you get
907
00:35:25.610 --> 00:35:27.930
more and more spoiling of the night sky, but
908
00:35:27.930 --> 00:35:29.330
you'll also get the opportunity for
909
00:35:29.330 --> 00:35:30.730
businesses, just like this question
910
00:35:30.730 --> 00:35:33.290
describes, to develop why there may be the
911
00:35:33.290 --> 00:35:35.800
commercial value for people to recover
912
00:35:35.800 --> 00:35:38.440
defunct satellites in orbit, capture them,
913
00:35:38.600 --> 00:35:40.720
maybe even lift them up to a higher orbit to
914
00:35:40.720 --> 00:35:43.200
a factory that can process the materials and
915
00:35:43.200 --> 00:35:44.880
let people then build new satellites in
916
00:35:44.880 --> 00:35:47.840
orbit. That way you lower the risk of them
917
00:35:47.840 --> 00:35:49.640
burning up in Earth's atmosphere, you get rid
918
00:35:49.640 --> 00:35:51.560
of the possibility of them altering the
919
00:35:51.560 --> 00:35:53.360
atmosphere to make climate change worse or
920
00:35:53.360 --> 00:35:55.520
better, as we discussed before. And um,
921
00:35:55.520 --> 00:35:57.280
you'll lower the cost of launching new ones
922
00:35:57.280 --> 00:35:59.040
if you could reprocess and salvage and
923
00:35:59.040 --> 00:36:01.590
rebuild. Yeah, it's probably not commercially
924
00:36:01.590 --> 00:36:03.590
feasible yet, which is why nobody's doing it
925
00:36:03.590 --> 00:36:06.590
yet. But it may well become so and so. This
926
00:36:06.590 --> 00:36:08.350
is something that I'd expect to evolve in the
927
00:36:08.350 --> 00:36:11.070
next say 50 years as all this stuff becomes
928
00:36:11.070 --> 00:36:11.830
more entrenched.
929
00:36:13.270 --> 00:36:15.630
Andrew Dunkley: It's interesting uh, in regard to the
930
00:36:15.630 --> 00:36:17.710
ownership side of things. Uh, it's like when
931
00:36:17.710 --> 00:36:19.870
you put your garbage bin out with all your
932
00:36:19.870 --> 00:36:22.710
stuff in it, it's still your stuff. And even
933
00:36:22.710 --> 00:36:25.430
as far as it being dumped in
934
00:36:25.430 --> 00:36:27.650
landfill, if you've thrown out your son's
935
00:36:27.650 --> 00:36:30.490
favorite toy and he wants it back, it's still
936
00:36:30.490 --> 00:36:33.410
his toy. So it's
937
00:36:33.410 --> 00:36:36.050
the same kind of thing, um, in a down to
938
00:36:36.050 --> 00:36:38.490
earth kind of way. And to our YouTube Music
939
00:36:38.490 --> 00:36:41.290
listener, um, just one final
940
00:36:41.290 --> 00:36:41.690
point.
941
00:36:41.770 --> 00:36:42.250
Jonti Horner: Yes.
942
00:36:42.410 --> 00:36:45.410
Andrew Dunkley: There are companies researching salvage in
943
00:36:45.410 --> 00:36:45.690
space.
944
00:36:46.330 --> 00:36:46.370
Jonti Horner: Newman.
945
00:36:46.370 --> 00:36:48.850
Andrew Dunkley: Ah space. Another one called AstroDailyPod
946
00:36:48.850 --> 00:36:51.290
Scale and of course the major parties, NASA
947
00:36:51.290 --> 00:36:54.050
and ESA and several others are
948
00:36:54.050 --> 00:36:56.850
looking into this. Uh but right now it's,
949
00:36:56.850 --> 00:36:59.570
it's not a very easy thing to do. But thanks
950
00:36:59.570 --> 00:37:01.210
for the question. Thanks for the question.
951
00:37:01.290 --> 00:37:01.850
Really good.
952
00:37:04.330 --> 00:37:06.730
Okay, we checked all four systems and being
953
00:37:06.730 --> 00:37:09.690
with a go space nats, uh, we have one
954
00:37:09.770 --> 00:37:12.730
final question. This one comes from Robert
955
00:37:12.810 --> 00:37:15.370
and Robert uh, is from the Netherlands
956
00:37:15.820 --> 00:37:17.850
uh, and he's got backing music on his
957
00:37:17.850 --> 00:37:18.170
question.
958
00:37:18.540 --> 00:37:21.460
Robert: Hello, this is Robert from Netherlands. I
959
00:37:21.460 --> 00:37:24.460
have a question for you today about radio
960
00:37:24.460 --> 00:37:27.420
waves because as we all know it's a very
961
00:37:27.420 --> 00:37:30.380
efficient low energy way of communicating
962
00:37:31.260 --> 00:37:34.220
data over vast distances. And
963
00:37:34.380 --> 00:37:36.060
I would think that if we are looking for
964
00:37:36.060 --> 00:37:38.980
aliens which I find very tantalizing at
965
00:37:38.980 --> 00:37:41.780
the subject, we should be looking for radio
966
00:37:41.780 --> 00:37:44.750
waves probably like 500
967
00:37:44.750 --> 00:37:47.670
light years of a radius of the earth which
968
00:37:48.150 --> 00:37:50.990
seems to be kind of a low priority. Never
969
00:37:50.990 --> 00:37:53.270
understood why, why there's there's a
970
00:37:53.270 --> 00:37:56.230
beanbags uh, observatory that can
971
00:37:56.550 --> 00:37:58.910
know really pinpoint these but you can't
972
00:37:58.910 --> 00:38:01.430
really cast a white net so to speak. Another
973
00:38:01.430 --> 00:38:04.270
square kilometer ray might be capable of
974
00:38:04.270 --> 00:38:07.070
this being built. Australia of course. I
975
00:38:07.070 --> 00:38:09.270
was hoping you guys would have some insights.
976
00:38:09.760 --> 00:38:12.160
They're going to be interact radio waves.
977
00:38:12.480 --> 00:38:14.500
Thank you so much time.
978
00:38:14.500 --> 00:38:17.440
Andrew Dunkley: Um, thank you Robert. Lovely
979
00:38:17.440 --> 00:38:20.240
music. Yeah, very, very spacey
980
00:38:20.480 --> 00:38:23.160
indeed. Um, I would have thought that
981
00:38:23.160 --> 00:38:26.160
that's prime target number one when
982
00:38:26.160 --> 00:38:28.760
searching for life beyond Earth. Um,
983
00:38:29.360 --> 00:38:31.920
would be to be listening for radio waves
984
00:38:32.080 --> 00:38:34.680
and, and Robert's right, the Square Kilometer
985
00:38:34.680 --> 00:38:37.070
Array will be capable for that. I think it be
986
00:38:37.070 --> 00:38:39.440
able to pick up airport radar uh
987
00:38:39.950 --> 00:38:42.030
as far away as 50 light years.
988
00:38:42.670 --> 00:38:45.310
Jonti Horner: Yes, it's an incredible, incredible tool and
989
00:38:45.470 --> 00:38:47.350
in fact this is what people have been doing.
990
00:38:47.350 --> 00:38:50.030
So this is the whole foundation of a subset
991
00:38:50.030 --> 00:38:52.270
of our science called seti, the Search for
992
00:38:52.270 --> 00:38:54.910
Extraterrestrial Intelligence. Often you
993
00:38:54.910 --> 00:38:56.670
describe this as a search for a needle in a
994
00:38:56.670 --> 00:38:57.950
hair stack, where you don't know what a
995
00:38:57.950 --> 00:38:59.870
needle looks like and you've never seen a
996
00:38:59.870 --> 00:39:02.870
hair stack before. So if you're trying to
997
00:39:02.870 --> 00:39:05.720
find life that is as technologically
998
00:39:05.720 --> 00:39:08.680
advanced as us, or more. So then there
999
00:39:08.680 --> 00:39:10.480
is an argument that listening for signals
1000
00:39:10.480 --> 00:39:12.240
would be a good way to do it. And kind of
1001
00:39:12.240 --> 00:39:14.480
corroborating that is the idea that we are
1002
00:39:14.960 --> 00:39:17.480
broadcasting into the voyage, screaming like
1003
00:39:17.480 --> 00:39:20.240
a toddler in a dark cave with our
1004
00:39:20.240 --> 00:39:22.800
radio broadcasts and, um, our TV broadcasts
1005
00:39:22.800 --> 00:39:25.240
and all this stuff with radio waves. And it's
1006
00:39:25.240 --> 00:39:27.880
often argued that either the Berlin Olympics,
1007
00:39:27.880 --> 00:39:30.770
which I think were 1936, or the coronation of
1008
00:39:30.770 --> 00:39:33.002
Queen Elizabeth the Second in possibly 1952.
1009
00:39:33.178 --> 00:39:35.770
1953, yeah, were the first broadcasts that
1010
00:39:35.770 --> 00:39:37.450
were powerful enough that would be easily
1011
00:39:37.450 --> 00:39:40.370
detected from elsewhere. So if you were
1012
00:39:40.450 --> 00:39:42.490
magically able to take the Square Kilometer
1013
00:39:42.490 --> 00:39:45.210
Array and place it as a star, ah, within
1014
00:39:45.210 --> 00:39:48.130
about 80 light years of the Earth, you'd be
1015
00:39:48.130 --> 00:39:49.650
able to listen in and watch the development
1016
00:39:49.730 --> 00:39:52.090
of our technological society as our
1017
00:39:52.090 --> 00:39:54.770
broadcasts get more numerous and more varied.
1018
00:39:54.850 --> 00:39:56.850
You'd probably be able to broadcast back and
1019
00:39:57.260 --> 00:39:58.860
say, please stop broadcasting, neighbours,
1020
00:39:58.860 --> 00:40:01.300
we're sick of it. We want to know more about
1021
00:40:01.300 --> 00:40:04.060
Scott and Charlene or whatever, um, people
1022
00:40:04.060 --> 00:40:05.940
will be able to listen in. And so this gives
1023
00:40:05.940 --> 00:40:07.780
everybody the idea that just like this
1024
00:40:07.780 --> 00:40:09.980
question, we could do the same thing and we
1025
00:40:09.980 --> 00:40:12.300
could try and tune in onto the broadcasts of
1026
00:40:12.380 --> 00:40:15.380
other societies. And that's
1027
00:40:15.380 --> 00:40:18.060
fundamentally the foundation of seti. Back
1028
00:40:18.060 --> 00:40:20.700
when I was an undergraduate, back when I was
1029
00:40:20.700 --> 00:40:22.780
at high school, in the early days of personal
1030
00:40:22.780 --> 00:40:24.740
computing, there was a program called SETI at
1031
00:40:24.740 --> 00:40:27.710
home, which was a way of distributing through
1032
00:40:27.710 --> 00:40:30.670
cloud computing, packets of data obtained by
1033
00:40:30.670 --> 00:40:32.670
radio telescopes to search for signals of
1034
00:40:32.670 --> 00:40:35.190
radio broadcasts. And nothing was found.
1035
00:40:35.590 --> 00:40:38.270
There are global usage of radio telescopes
1036
00:40:38.270 --> 00:40:39.510
around the world to try and do this still.
1037
00:40:39.510 --> 00:40:41.950
The most famous of them these days is the
1038
00:40:41.950 --> 00:40:44.350
Breakthrough Listen Initiative, which was
1039
00:40:44.350 --> 00:40:46.990
funded to the tune of $100 million starting
1040
00:40:46.990 --> 00:40:49.270
back in 2015. So it's 10 years old now.
1041
00:40:49.990 --> 00:40:52.320
That did a wonderful thing for Australia
1042
00:40:52.400 --> 00:40:53.880
because the government at the time in
1043
00:40:53.880 --> 00:40:56.720
Australia was our, um, less
1044
00:40:56.720 --> 00:40:58.760
science friendly party, let's put it that
1045
00:40:58.760 --> 00:41:00.640
way. And, uh, they were looking to save money
1046
00:41:00.640 --> 00:41:03.400
by killing science, as often happens, and
1047
00:41:03.400 --> 00:41:05.640
that's having knock on effects nowadays. But
1048
00:41:05.640 --> 00:41:07.760
one of the things they wanted to do was close
1049
00:41:07.840 --> 00:41:10.800
the dish, the Parks Radio Observatory,
1050
00:41:11.200 --> 00:41:14.120
which is the Biggest, most iconic observatory
1051
00:41:14.120 --> 00:41:16.000
building I think in Australia, famous for
1052
00:41:16.410 --> 00:41:18.210
awesome movie the Dish with Sam Neill many
1053
00:41:18.210 --> 00:41:18.610
years ago.
1054
00:41:18.610 --> 00:41:20.050
Andrew Dunkley: And it's just down the road from.
1055
00:41:20.050 --> 00:41:22.090
Jonti Horner: Where I live, just down the road. And there
1056
00:41:22.090 --> 00:41:23.930
was a lot of upset that this wonderful
1057
00:41:23.930 --> 00:41:25.690
facility was going to be mothballed and
1058
00:41:25.690 --> 00:41:27.850
closed down to cut budgets,
1059
00:41:28.140 --> 00:41:30.850
um, because, you know, they wanted to put
1060
00:41:30.850 --> 00:41:32.529
more money into fossil fuel extraction to
1061
00:41:32.529 --> 00:41:35.130
satisfy their donors or whatever. I, um, have
1062
00:41:35.130 --> 00:41:38.010
views anyway, many do.
1063
00:41:38.490 --> 00:41:41.450
Parks was saved by an injection of a very
1064
00:41:41.450 --> 00:41:43.170
large sum of money from the Breakthrough
1065
00:41:43.170 --> 00:41:45.830
Listen initiative, which has kept the
1066
00:41:45.830 --> 00:41:47.630
telescope operating for another decade.
1067
00:41:47.630 --> 00:41:49.430
There's a lot of awesome new science has come
1068
00:41:49.430 --> 00:41:51.790
out of it as a result, but it is bought a
1069
00:41:51.790 --> 00:41:53.230
certain fraction of the time of that
1070
00:41:53.230 --> 00:41:55.790
telescope, which I think is about 40% to
1071
00:41:55.790 --> 00:41:57.830
specifically point that telescope around the
1072
00:41:57.830 --> 00:42:00.790
star to listen to radio broadcasts, to
1073
00:42:00.790 --> 00:42:03.550
look for radio broadcasts from nearby stars.
1074
00:42:04.190 --> 00:42:06.670
And there's been a number of papers come out
1075
00:42:06.670 --> 00:42:09.550
on this over the years that detail
1076
00:42:09.550 --> 00:42:11.350
the incredible work people have done. And to
1077
00:42:11.350 --> 00:42:12.830
illustrate the challenge of these things,
1078
00:42:12.830 --> 00:42:14.470
there's been a few occasions where people
1079
00:42:14.470 --> 00:42:16.830
think there's been a potential signal only
1080
00:42:16.830 --> 00:42:18.830
for it to be turned out to be something else.
1081
00:42:19.150 --> 00:42:21.590
One example was that they thought they'd
1082
00:42:21.590 --> 00:42:22.830
found a potential signal. And when they
1083
00:42:22.830 --> 00:42:24.470
investigated more, it happened at the same
1084
00:42:24.470 --> 00:42:26.870
time every evening and investigated more. And
1085
00:42:26.870 --> 00:42:28.390
it was that the astronomers were walking
1086
00:42:28.390 --> 00:42:29.750
across one of the building and putting their
1087
00:42:29.750 --> 00:42:32.349
food in the microwave. Yes, the building was
1088
00:42:32.349 --> 00:42:34.590
shielded. They were picking up the radiation
1089
00:42:34.590 --> 00:42:36.590
from the microwaves, you know, so it's really
1090
00:42:36.590 --> 00:42:39.230
hard to do today. We have found
1091
00:42:39.230 --> 00:42:41.550
nothing. No. And ah, there are some arguments
1092
00:42:41.550 --> 00:42:43.760
that, uh, it's very unlikely we will do.
1093
00:42:43.760 --> 00:42:45.520
That's a needle in a hair sack thing.
1094
00:42:46.320 --> 00:42:49.040
Firstly, we need to figure out where
1095
00:42:49.120 --> 00:42:51.600
in the radio spectrum to look. And um, the
1096
00:42:51.600 --> 00:42:54.200
radio wave frequency spectrum spans an
1097
00:42:54.200 --> 00:42:56.800
enormous range. A lot of efforts have been
1098
00:42:56.800 --> 00:42:59.280
focused around the hydrogen 21 centimeter
1099
00:42:59.280 --> 00:43:01.760
line viewing. That has been an obvious place
1100
00:43:01.760 --> 00:43:03.680
for people who are deliberately broadcasting
1101
00:43:03.680 --> 00:43:05.280
to broadcast, because everyone will know
1102
00:43:05.280 --> 00:43:07.840
about that. But in terms of accidental
1103
00:43:07.840 --> 00:43:09.320
broadcasts like what we're doing on the
1104
00:43:09.320 --> 00:43:11.570
Earth, there's no guarantee that another
1105
00:43:11.570 --> 00:43:13.970
species would pick the same frequencies that
1106
00:43:13.970 --> 00:43:16.690
we've chosen for the broadcast. So we might
1107
00:43:16.690 --> 00:43:18.610
be listening to the wrong tune, we might just
1108
00:43:18.610 --> 00:43:21.330
be listening at the wrong frequency. The
1109
00:43:21.330 --> 00:43:22.770
other thing though is that, uh, the kind of
1110
00:43:22.770 --> 00:43:24.090
broadcasting we've been doing for the last
1111
00:43:24.090 --> 00:43:25.610
hundred years is incredibly energy
1112
00:43:25.849 --> 00:43:28.610
inefficient because we broadcast in
1113
00:43:28.610 --> 00:43:30.970
all directions at ah, once.
1114
00:43:31.450 --> 00:43:34.050
To have a very small number of directions
1115
00:43:34.050 --> 00:43:35.930
pick up that signal, you know, all your TV
1116
00:43:35.930 --> 00:43:38.270
aerials Or whatever. It is much more
1117
00:43:38.270 --> 00:43:40.470
efficient to do point to point communications
1118
00:43:40.470 --> 00:43:43.070
or to send things through optical cables.
1119
00:43:43.390 --> 00:43:45.150
So there is some argument that as your
1120
00:43:45.150 --> 00:43:47.750
technology gets better, the amount of waste
1121
00:43:47.750 --> 00:43:49.950
noise you broadcast to space will fall off.
1122
00:43:49.950 --> 00:43:51.790
Yes. And so there's an argument that in the
1123
00:43:51.790 --> 00:43:53.630
next 30 or 40 years the Earth will become
1124
00:43:53.630 --> 00:43:56.270
radio silent again. So then there'll be this
1125
00:43:56.270 --> 00:43:57.950
little bubble around the earth getting bigger
1126
00:43:57.950 --> 00:43:59.710
and bigger where if you're in that bubble,
1127
00:43:59.950 --> 00:44:01.990
you hear our radio broadcast, but then
1128
00:44:01.990 --> 00:44:03.430
there's a smaller bubble in the middle where
1129
00:44:03.430 --> 00:44:04.510
we go silent again.
1130
00:44:04.830 --> 00:44:05.110
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah.
1131
00:44:05.110 --> 00:44:06.830
Jonti Horner: And it may be that every technological
1132
00:44:06.830 --> 00:44:08.870
species is only loud when it's in its
1133
00:44:08.870 --> 00:44:11.390
infancy, when it is that toddler screaming
1134
00:44:11.390 --> 00:44:12.710
that they don't want to leave the beach like
1135
00:44:12.710 --> 00:44:15.470
the kid I saw yesterday. And eventually
1136
00:44:15.790 --> 00:44:18.710
a uh, society learns to self regulate and
1137
00:44:18.710 --> 00:44:21.390
has more efficient ways of broadcasting. So
1138
00:44:21.390 --> 00:44:24.070
it is a fabulous question. If you want to
1139
00:44:24.070 --> 00:44:26.030
learn more about it. I do recommend looking
1140
00:44:26.030 --> 00:44:28.310
up and googling and reading around SETI as a
1141
00:44:28.310 --> 00:44:30.550
project SETI at home and the Breakthrough
1142
00:44:30.550 --> 00:44:33.480
Listen initiative. You can also look up
1143
00:44:33.720 --> 00:44:36.680
an associated thing which is mete. Mete,
1144
00:44:36.840 --> 00:44:39.840
which is, I think METE is the acronym which
1145
00:44:39.840 --> 00:44:42.560
is a search for the artifacts of advanced
1146
00:44:42.560 --> 00:44:45.520
civilizations. Oh, and I know colleague
1147
00:44:45.520 --> 00:44:47.720
of mine in the US who's part of our planet
1148
00:44:47.720 --> 00:44:50.440
search team has put out a few papers looking
1149
00:44:50.600 --> 00:44:53.480
at things that appear in science fiction like
1150
00:44:53.480 --> 00:44:56.160
Dyson spheres and ringworlds and
1151
00:44:56.160 --> 00:44:58.160
what effect they would have on the light from
1152
00:44:58.160 --> 00:45:00.420
their stars. So what the observational
1153
00:45:00.420 --> 00:45:03.260
signatures would be not with any
1154
00:45:03.260 --> 00:45:05.380
expectation that we'll ever find them, but
1155
00:45:05.380 --> 00:45:06.980
because if we don't model what they would be
1156
00:45:06.980 --> 00:45:09.100
like, if we ever see something that displays
1157
00:45:09.100 --> 00:45:10.740
that odd behavior, we wouldn't know what it
1158
00:45:10.740 --> 00:45:13.500
was. So it's again this very low
1159
00:45:13.500 --> 00:45:15.220
likelihood of finding something, but very
1160
00:45:15.220 --> 00:45:18.100
high reward if you ever do. I
1161
00:45:18.100 --> 00:45:20.100
guess that people are actually actively
1162
00:45:20.100 --> 00:45:22.780
thinking about what could we feasibly do
1163
00:45:23.100 --> 00:45:25.460
as a technological civilization in the future
1164
00:45:25.460 --> 00:45:27.990
with improving technology. How would that
1165
00:45:27.990 --> 00:45:30.550
affect our environment around the sun? How
1166
00:45:30.550 --> 00:45:32.590
would that affect the way that our planetary
1167
00:45:32.590 --> 00:45:34.950
system pairs from around other stars? And uh,
1168
00:45:35.030 --> 00:45:36.670
what would that look like if we saw a
1169
00:45:36.670 --> 00:45:39.470
different civilization doing it? So that we
1170
00:45:39.470 --> 00:45:41.230
have the predictions there so that when we
1171
00:45:41.230 --> 00:45:43.710
get vast amounts of data from these all sky
1172
00:45:43.710 --> 00:45:46.190
surveys, whether they be in the radio or
1173
00:45:46.190 --> 00:45:48.510
whether they be in the optical, we can
1174
00:45:48.510 --> 00:45:50.350
identify the oddities and figure out what
1175
00:45:50.350 --> 00:45:52.070
they are. And similarly with a square
1176
00:45:52.070 --> 00:45:54.360
kilometer array that will be pointing all
1177
00:45:54.360 --> 00:45:57.280
over the sky, doing lots of astronomy, but
1178
00:45:57.280 --> 00:45:59.760
the data from that will be analyzed by teams
1179
00:45:59.760 --> 00:46:01.920
who are interested in could there be an alien
1180
00:46:01.920 --> 00:46:04.280
signal buried in this. So you will get
1181
00:46:04.280 --> 00:46:06.640
serendipitous imaging there because wherever
1182
00:46:06.640 --> 00:46:08.960
it's looking, you get the data and you can
1183
00:46:08.960 --> 00:46:10.760
survey that to see what there is. So it is
1184
00:46:10.760 --> 00:46:13.040
something people are actively doing. You're
1185
00:46:13.040 --> 00:46:14.520
onto something good there. And I can
1186
00:46:14.520 --> 00:46:15.760
recommend, like I said, reading about
1187
00:46:15.760 --> 00:46:18.520
breakthrough lists and reading about SETI to
1188
00:46:18.520 --> 00:46:20.000
learn more about it, if that is what you're
1189
00:46:20.000 --> 00:46:20.750
interested in it.
1190
00:46:20.750 --> 00:46:23.230
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah, uh, it'd be uh, interesting to
1191
00:46:23.230 --> 00:46:26.070
discover another race somewhere
1192
00:46:26.070 --> 00:46:28.470
out there that's uh, built a megastructure,
1193
00:46:28.550 --> 00:46:31.510
um, like, oh, I don't know, a space parasol
1194
00:46:32.150 --> 00:46:35.150
array of some kind. Imagine that same
1195
00:46:35.150 --> 00:46:37.670
problem. Someone else has solved it. Yeah,
1196
00:46:37.690 --> 00:46:38.830
uh, we are going to be.
1197
00:46:38.830 --> 00:46:40.870
Jonti Horner: Doing a little, little baby test of that
1198
00:46:40.950 --> 00:46:42.870
potentially in the next 10 or 20 years if
1199
00:46:42.870 --> 00:46:45.710
NASA ever gets its funding back. There is the
1200
00:46:45.710 --> 00:46:48.390
Habitable Worlds Observatory that is
1201
00:46:48.870 --> 00:46:51.110
looking at planets around other stars. And
1202
00:46:51.110 --> 00:46:53.310
um, what they're proposing to do to allow
1203
00:46:53.310 --> 00:46:55.350
them to gather light from planets the size of
1204
00:46:55.350 --> 00:46:57.390
the Earth, uh, around stars like the sun, is
1205
00:46:57.390 --> 00:46:59.350
reflectively fly a very giant,
1206
00:46:59.830 --> 00:47:01.830
beautifully designed, very intricate,
1207
00:47:01.830 --> 00:47:04.110
fractally edged, um, space
1208
00:47:04.110 --> 00:47:06.828
parasol that would go out about 100,000
1209
00:47:06.952 --> 00:47:09.870
km from the telescope and fly in formation,
1210
00:47:09.870 --> 00:47:11.950
line up to block the light from stars so that
1211
00:47:11.950 --> 00:47:13.500
we can see the planets going around them.
1212
00:47:13.970 --> 00:47:16.010
Now that size of parasol would be way too
1213
00:47:16.010 --> 00:47:18.370
small to impact climate change, but it's a
1214
00:47:18.370 --> 00:47:20.130
really good tech demonstrator. It shows that
1215
00:47:20.130 --> 00:47:22.330
we can do that and we can get the station
1216
00:47:22.330 --> 00:47:24.810
keeping just much too small. And again, if
1217
00:47:24.810 --> 00:47:26.370
people are interested in that looking up, the
1218
00:47:26.370 --> 00:47:29.250
Habitable Worlds Observatory would be a
1219
00:47:29.250 --> 00:47:30.690
good place to look. And there's some lovely
1220
00:47:30.690 --> 00:47:32.650
videos of the animation of this thing being
1221
00:47:32.650 --> 00:47:34.730
launched and unfolding and moving out in
1222
00:47:34.730 --> 00:47:37.250
space. And they've even done tests in labs
1223
00:47:37.490 --> 00:47:40.170
for mini versions of it on long corridors to
1224
00:47:40.170 --> 00:47:41.370
prove the concept works.
1225
00:47:42.240 --> 00:47:45.080
Andrew Dunkley: All very cool, very cool indeed. And uh, a
1226
00:47:45.080 --> 00:47:46.920
cool question too, Robert. Thanks for sending
1227
00:47:46.920 --> 00:47:48.480
it in. And if you would like to send us
1228
00:47:48.480 --> 00:47:50.320
questions, don't Forget our website
1229
00:47:50.400 --> 00:47:52.160
spacenutspodcast.com
1230
00:47:52.640 --> 00:47:55.280
spacenuts IO and
1231
00:47:55.620 --> 00:47:57.920
uh, click on the AMA link and you can send us
1232
00:47:58.000 --> 00:48:00.920
text, uh, and audio questions, uh, through
1233
00:48:00.920 --> 00:48:03.240
that system. And uh, we'd be happy to get
1234
00:48:03.240 --> 00:48:04.960
them and we'll do our very best to answer
1235
00:48:04.960 --> 00:48:06.800
them. Sometimes we get the same questions,
1236
00:48:07.540 --> 00:48:10.190
um, which is not unusual if people sort of
1237
00:48:10.190 --> 00:48:12.710
hone in on a topic. Uh, so we will,
1238
00:48:12.960 --> 00:48:14.990
um, if we don't answer your question, it's
1239
00:48:14.990 --> 00:48:17.600
possibly because we've already done it, uh,
1240
00:48:17.600 --> 00:48:19.710
but we do redo questions from time to time
1241
00:48:19.710 --> 00:48:21.830
because they keep coming up, um, particularly
1242
00:48:21.830 --> 00:48:24.030
black hole questions. We quite often get a
1243
00:48:24.030 --> 00:48:26.350
repeat. Might be a couple of years later, but
1244
00:48:26.350 --> 00:48:28.070
we get a repeat of a question we've already
1245
00:48:28.310 --> 00:48:30.870
covered. So we'll, we'll sometimes redo them.
1246
00:48:31.190 --> 00:48:32.790
But, uh, good to hear from you, Robert.
1247
00:48:32.790 --> 00:48:34.910
Thanks to everyone who contributed and thanks
1248
00:48:34.910 --> 00:48:37.230
to you, Jonti, for having a crack at the
1249
00:48:37.230 --> 00:48:37.750
answers.
1250
00:48:38.560 --> 00:48:39.960
Jonti Horner: That's all good. It's what I'm here for. And
1251
00:48:39.960 --> 00:48:42.040
it's fun to face new and interesting
1252
00:48:42.040 --> 00:48:42.520
questions.
1253
00:48:42.520 --> 00:48:45.280
Andrew Dunkley: It is indeed. Uh, we'll see you on the next
1254
00:48:45.280 --> 00:48:47.640
episode. Jonti, uh, Horner, professor of
1255
00:48:47.640 --> 00:48:49.720
Astrophysics at the University of Southern
1256
00:48:49.720 --> 00:48:51.680
Queensland. And thanks to Huw in the studio.
1257
00:48:52.960 --> 00:48:55.360
Not, um, sure you're aware that Huw used to
1258
00:48:55.360 --> 00:48:57.920
work in radio. That's how we actually met. In
1259
00:48:57.920 --> 00:49:00.630
fact, he was working at a radio station, uh,
1260
00:49:00.630 --> 00:49:03.120
in Newcastle in New South Wales when I was a
1261
00:49:03.120 --> 00:49:04.840
kid and I did job experience there. And
1262
00:49:04.840 --> 00:49:06.960
that's how I met Huw originally, when I was
1263
00:49:06.960 --> 00:49:09.130
about 13 years old or something.
1264
00:49:09.450 --> 00:49:12.330
Anyway, he's an old radio man these days
1265
00:49:12.330 --> 00:49:15.130
and, uh, when it comes to radio waves,
1266
00:49:15.450 --> 00:49:17.650
he feels that that means he should stand out
1267
00:49:17.650 --> 00:49:20.010
the front waving at traffic. That's why he's
1268
00:49:20.010 --> 00:49:22.570
not with us today. And he may never come
1269
00:49:22.570 --> 00:49:24.690
back. And from me, Andrew Dunkley, thanks for
1270
00:49:24.690 --> 00:49:27.130
your company. I'll see you on the next
1271
00:49:27.130 --> 00:49:29.130
episode of Space Nuts. Bye. Bye.
1272
00:49:30.330 --> 00:49:32.530
Jonti Horner: You'll be listening to the Space Nuts.
1273
00:49:32.530 --> 00:49:33.130
Robert: Podcast.
1274
00:49:34.900 --> 00:49:37.540
Jonti Horner: Available at Apple Podcasts, Spotify,
1275
00:49:37.700 --> 00:49:40.460
iHeartRadio or your favorite podcast
1276
00:49:40.460 --> 00:49:42.780
player. You can also stream on demand at
1277
00:49:42.780 --> 00:49:43.860
bytes. Com.
1278
00:49:44.180 --> 00:49:46.260
Andrew Dunkley: This has been another quality podcast
1279
00:49:46.260 --> 00:49:47.940
production from Bytes.
1280
00:49:47.940 --> 00:49:48.070
Jonti Horner: Com.
1281
00:49:48.070 --> 00:49:48.230
Speaker C: Um.
0
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:00.440
Jonti Horner: Hi there.
1
00:00:00.440 --> 00:00:02.720
Andrew Dunkley: Thanks for joining us on Space Nuts Q and A
2
00:00:02.720 --> 00:00:04.760
edition. This is where the audience sets the
3
00:00:04.760 --> 00:00:06.880
agenda, and we answer the questions to the
4
00:00:06.880 --> 00:00:08.920
best of our ability, which is not much
5
00:00:08.920 --> 00:00:11.380
ability at all, but we'll do it anyway. Uh,
6
00:00:11.380 --> 00:00:13.440
coming up, questions about light pollution.
7
00:00:13.520 --> 00:00:16.279
A, uh, space parasol to protect
8
00:00:16.279 --> 00:00:19.120
Earth. Interesting. Uh, also salvage
9
00:00:19.120 --> 00:00:21.840
rights in space and radio waves.
10
00:00:22.000 --> 00:00:24.560
That's all coming up on space nuts.
11
00:00:24.800 --> 00:00:27.280
15 seconds. Guidance is internal.
12
00:00:27.520 --> 00:00:30.240
10, 9, ignition
13
00:00:30.240 --> 00:00:33.066
sequence. Star nuts. 5, 4,
14
00:00:33.134 --> 00:00:36.126
3, 2. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 5, 4,
15
00:00:36.194 --> 00:00:37.180
3, 2, 1.
16
00:00:37.260 --> 00:00:38.380
Jonti Horner: Space nuts.
17
00:00:38.460 --> 00:00:41.420
Andrew Dunkley: Astronauts report it feels good. And
18
00:00:41.420 --> 00:00:43.820
he's back again. Professor Jonti Horner,
19
00:00:43.820 --> 00:00:45.580
professor of Astrophysics at the University
20
00:00:45.580 --> 00:00:47.740
of Southern Queensland. Jonti. Hi there.
21
00:00:48.220 --> 00:00:49.580
Jonti Horner: Good afternoon. How are you going?
22
00:00:49.660 --> 00:00:52.660
Andrew Dunkley: I am well. Want to get
23
00:00:52.660 --> 00:00:53.340
straight into it?
24
00:00:53.740 --> 00:00:55.180
Jonti Horner: Yeah, let's dive on in.
25
00:00:55.260 --> 00:00:57.780
Andrew Dunkley: Okay. Question time. And our, uh, first
26
00:00:57.780 --> 00:00:59.740
question comes from Mark.
27
00:01:00.660 --> 00:01:02.980
He says, hello. I have a question about light
28
00:01:02.980 --> 00:01:05.340
pollution. I live in Connecticut, and the
29
00:01:05.340 --> 00:01:07.220
light pollution is not as bad as New York
30
00:01:07.220 --> 00:01:10.020
City, but it is enough. I'm planning a trip
31
00:01:10.020 --> 00:01:12.700
to Montana this summer just to see the night
32
00:01:12.700 --> 00:01:15.500
sky. My question is, if I was standing
33
00:01:15.500 --> 00:01:18.020
in my yard and there was a sudden EMP
34
00:01:18.340 --> 00:01:20.660
burst and all the electric lights went out,
35
00:01:20.900 --> 00:01:23.420
how long would it take for me to be able to
36
00:01:23.420 --> 00:01:26.420
see the night sky in Connecticut as clear and
37
00:01:26.500 --> 00:01:29.220
as. As beautiful as Point Nemo? I understand
38
00:01:29.380 --> 00:01:31.860
light speed is fast, but how fast
39
00:01:32.260 --> 00:01:35.100
would it be to clear the view? I've
40
00:01:35.100 --> 00:01:37.580
just, uh, recently discovered your podcast. I
41
00:01:37.580 --> 00:01:40.260
learned something new with each uh, one.
42
00:01:40.680 --> 00:01:42.739
Uh, please keep up the outstanding work. I
43
00:01:42.739 --> 00:01:45.020
look forward to every new episode.
44
00:01:45.020 --> 00:01:47.820
Sincerely, Mark Bookbinder. Thank you,
45
00:01:47.820 --> 00:01:49.700
Mark. That's a lovely comment. Uh, we don't
46
00:01:49.700 --> 00:01:51.780
get many nice comments. Everyone's usually
47
00:01:51.780 --> 00:01:53.820
sticking the knife in. No, I'm not kidding.
48
00:01:53.820 --> 00:01:56.700
Most people, uh, are terrific. Um,
49
00:01:56.790 --> 00:01:58.910
although we get the occasional jibe, but that
50
00:01:58.910 --> 00:02:01.780
goes with the territory. Um,
51
00:02:01.780 --> 00:02:04.710
yeah, look, I. I had a think about this one,
52
00:02:04.710 --> 00:02:06.070
and I. I would suggest.
53
00:02:07.750 --> 00:02:09.710
I don't want to steal your thunder, Jonti,
54
00:02:09.710 --> 00:02:10.990
because I know you've done your homework, but
55
00:02:10.990 --> 00:02:12.990
I would suggest that it would be fairly
56
00:02:12.990 --> 00:02:15.110
instantaneous because the amount of light
57
00:02:15.110 --> 00:02:17.910
coming down would be the same.
58
00:02:18.710 --> 00:02:20.910
It's just that it's disturbed by the light
59
00:02:20.910 --> 00:02:23.630
we're sending up. So when that light we are
60
00:02:23.630 --> 00:02:26.340
creating suddenly disappeared, surely
61
00:02:26.340 --> 00:02:28.860
the effect would be an instant
62
00:02:29.340 --> 00:02:31.260
view of what's really happening up there.
63
00:02:32.540 --> 00:02:34.540
Jonti Horner: Effectively, I think that's pretty much it.
64
00:02:34.700 --> 00:02:37.620
Um, uh, now, there's a few
65
00:02:37.620 --> 00:02:38.940
things that fall into that, and that's a
66
00:02:38.940 --> 00:02:41.180
really good kind of executive summary type
67
00:02:41.180 --> 00:02:43.700
level. So the reason that Light pollution is
68
00:02:43.700 --> 00:02:45.420
a problem for you. Seeing the night sky and
69
00:02:45.420 --> 00:02:48.180
all its wonder is you're basically increasing
70
00:02:48.180 --> 00:02:50.020
the brightness of the whole sky by an
71
00:02:50.020 --> 00:02:52.660
artificial amount which washes out the
72
00:02:52.660 --> 00:02:55.020
fine detail of the darker, the fainter stuff.
73
00:02:55.260 --> 00:02:57.140
So the brighter your light pollution levels
74
00:02:57.140 --> 00:02:59.700
are, uh, the brighter the sky is and so the
75
00:02:59.700 --> 00:03:01.460
fewer faint objects you can see and the more
76
00:03:01.460 --> 00:03:03.940
you brighten that, the less you'll see. If
77
00:03:03.940 --> 00:03:06.660
you turn all the lights off at once, the sky
78
00:03:06.660 --> 00:03:09.420
will almost instantaneously become as dark
79
00:03:09.580 --> 00:03:12.140
as it could possibly be. And then what's
80
00:03:12.140 --> 00:03:14.540
working against you is the adaptation of your
81
00:03:14.540 --> 00:03:17.420
eye. So we have this thing called dark
82
00:03:17.420 --> 00:03:20.320
adaptation and m, it's how our eye
83
00:03:20.480 --> 00:03:22.600
adjusts and responds to low light levels to
84
00:03:22.600 --> 00:03:24.520
allow us to function in those levels
85
00:03:24.520 --> 00:03:27.480
effectively. And you get the bulk of
86
00:03:27.480 --> 00:03:29.200
your dark adaption within about the first
87
00:03:29.200 --> 00:03:32.120
five minutes. But your eyes continue
88
00:03:32.120 --> 00:03:34.280
adapting and getting better and better at
89
00:03:34.280 --> 00:03:37.200
seeing in the dark over about
90
00:03:37.200 --> 00:03:40.080
45 minute period. So you have to be out under
91
00:03:40.080 --> 00:03:42.120
the night sky and avoid looking at any
92
00:03:42.120 --> 00:03:44.880
sources of bright light for about 45
93
00:03:44.880 --> 00:03:46.840
minutes before you're as adapted as you can
94
00:03:46.840 --> 00:03:49.000
be and you can get the best possible view you
95
00:03:49.000 --> 00:03:52.000
can get. Now what would happen is if you
96
00:03:52.000 --> 00:03:54.040
were out and about in your sadly light
97
00:03:54.040 --> 00:03:56.800
polluted skies in Connecticut, um,
98
00:03:57.160 --> 00:03:59.520
you are um, not very well dark adapted
99
00:03:59.520 --> 00:04:02.160
because the sky is very bright. So your clock
100
00:04:02.160 --> 00:04:04.000
would have to start ticking from the point
101
00:04:04.000 --> 00:04:05.720
the lights went out. So I would hope that the
102
00:04:05.720 --> 00:04:07.520
lights stared out for at least an hour for
103
00:04:07.520 --> 00:04:10.440
you to give you the best possible view. But
104
00:04:10.440 --> 00:04:12.280
even then you might not get the best view of
105
00:04:12.280 --> 00:04:13.920
the night sky you could anywhere on Earth,
106
00:04:13.920 --> 00:04:15.840
because you then run into the issues of the
107
00:04:15.840 --> 00:04:18.610
Earth's atmosphere. Um, now I
108
00:04:18.930 --> 00:04:20.930
regularly go out to the wonderful Lady
109
00:04:20.930 --> 00:04:22.450
Elliott island on the Barrier Reef where
110
00:04:22.450 --> 00:04:24.250
there's effectively no light pollution at all
111
00:04:24.250 --> 00:04:26.410
and the sky is dark enough that for example,
112
00:04:26.410 --> 00:04:29.050
I can see the Triangulum galaxy, which is
113
00:04:29.050 --> 00:04:31.570
fainter than Andromeda. I can see pretty much
114
00:04:31.570 --> 00:04:33.290
every time I go out there there's a darker
115
00:04:33.290 --> 00:04:36.170
light and um, I lead guessing
116
00:04:36.170 --> 00:04:38.090
some stargazing there and m tell them how
117
00:04:38.090 --> 00:04:40.250
awesome the sky is. But I make the point that
118
00:04:40.250 --> 00:04:41.770
if they were to go to the centre of
119
00:04:41.770 --> 00:04:44.040
Australia, to somewhere like Uluru or out
120
00:04:44.040 --> 00:04:46.440
into the Nullarborg Desert, they'd actually
121
00:04:46.440 --> 00:04:49.120
see a better sky there than we see at Lady
122
00:04:49.120 --> 00:04:51.200
Elliot. Because at Lady Elliot you have a
123
00:04:51.200 --> 00:04:52.920
limitation that you're surrounded by very
124
00:04:52.920 --> 00:04:55.120
humid, very turbulent air because of the
125
00:04:55.120 --> 00:04:57.200
energy from the ocean stirring the air up.
126
00:04:57.760 --> 00:05:00.680
And so different locations on the Earth offer
127
00:05:00.680 --> 00:05:02.880
different clarity of the night sky.
128
00:05:03.600 --> 00:05:06.080
So what I'd suggest is from Connecticut,
129
00:05:06.480 --> 00:05:08.320
I've got the light pollution map up here,
130
00:05:08.640 --> 00:05:10.760
which, um, is light pollutionmap.info for
131
00:05:10.760 --> 00:05:12.640
people who want to look and weep at how bad
132
00:05:12.640 --> 00:05:15.110
the skies are from their location and plan
133
00:05:15.110 --> 00:05:17.590
their dark sky holidays. That's a really nice
134
00:05:17.590 --> 00:05:20.310
little website. You're relatively coastal
135
00:05:20.390 --> 00:05:21.910
and so therefore your air is going to be
136
00:05:21.910 --> 00:05:23.390
quite humid and turbulent. And I would
137
00:05:23.390 --> 00:05:25.950
suggest if you turned, turned all the lights
138
00:05:25.950 --> 00:05:28.870
on the earth off, that you would have an
139
00:05:28.870 --> 00:05:31.470
experience probably comparable to what we get
140
00:05:31.470 --> 00:05:33.750
in coastal Australia. Whereas if you went
141
00:05:33.750 --> 00:05:35.430
deep into the inland and you got a really
142
00:05:35.430 --> 00:05:38.190
dark sky and be better if you then went
143
00:05:38.190 --> 00:05:40.630
to higher ground, like perhaps in Arizona,
144
00:05:40.630 --> 00:05:43.190
which I understand is a quite high altitude
145
00:05:43.190 --> 00:05:45.570
desert. If you're at higher altitude
146
00:05:46.370 --> 00:05:49.250
there is less air, so therefore there is
147
00:05:49.250 --> 00:05:52.250
less muck and you get a better sky. But
148
00:05:52.250 --> 00:05:53.850
that's balanced by the fact that if you're at
149
00:05:53.850 --> 00:05:55.530
high enough altitude, you're not getting as
150
00:05:55.530 --> 00:05:57.650
much oxygen and you don't see as effectively.
151
00:05:57.970 --> 00:05:59.849
So I've had stories from colleagues of mine
152
00:05:59.849 --> 00:06:01.650
who've been up to the great observatories,
153
00:06:02.220 --> 00:06:05.090
um, in the Andes, in Chile and also up
154
00:06:05.090 --> 00:06:07.250
in Hawaii who've gone out on a night and
155
00:06:07.250 --> 00:06:08.810
they've initially been quite disappointed
156
00:06:08.810 --> 00:06:10.450
that they didn't see a sky quite as
157
00:06:10.450 --> 00:06:12.120
expensive, as spectacular as they thought
158
00:06:12.120 --> 00:06:14.440
they would do. And people on Hawaii actually
159
00:06:14.440 --> 00:06:16.800
will often have a little bowl of oxygen and
160
00:06:16.800 --> 00:06:19.400
have an inhale to increase their blood oxygen
161
00:06:19.400 --> 00:06:21.880
levels, to increase the response of their
162
00:06:21.960 --> 00:06:24.480
eyes to counter the thinner atmosphere and
163
00:06:24.480 --> 00:06:26.280
then they get a really spectacular view.
164
00:06:26.360 --> 00:06:26.840
Andrew Dunkley: Wow.
165
00:06:27.000 --> 00:06:29.080
Jonti Horner: So, like most questions, there's a very
166
00:06:29.080 --> 00:06:31.560
simple answer which is as soon as the light
167
00:06:31.560 --> 00:06:34.160
goes out, you'll get a really good view, but
168
00:06:34.160 --> 00:06:36.640
that view will get better as your eyes adjust
169
00:06:36.640 --> 00:06:38.840
to the darkness. But how good of you you get
170
00:06:39.420 --> 00:06:41.180
is not just dependent on the light pollution,
171
00:06:41.180 --> 00:06:42.900
you'll start to bring in other effects. And
172
00:06:42.900 --> 00:06:45.660
my hope would be that the EMP burst and the
173
00:06:45.660 --> 00:06:47.820
end of all street lighting would happen at
174
00:06:47.820 --> 00:06:50.020
new moon rather than full moon. Because if
175
00:06:50.020 --> 00:06:52.380
you've got a full moon in the sky, all those
176
00:06:52.380 --> 00:06:54.940
effects of humidity and dust are exacerbated.
177
00:06:55.500 --> 00:06:57.180
And even with all the lights turned off, the
178
00:06:57.180 --> 00:06:58.500
night sky at full moon is a bit
179
00:06:58.500 --> 00:07:00.060
disappointing. You know, if I could do one
180
00:07:00.060 --> 00:07:01.620
astronomical thing as a kind of great
181
00:07:01.620 --> 00:07:04.140
celestial dictator, I get rid of the moon.
182
00:07:04.300 --> 00:07:05.980
It's just a pen in the backside. It's always
183
00:07:05.980 --> 00:07:07.820
in the way when I want to take photos and
184
00:07:07.900 --> 00:07:09.860
stops me seeing the more interesting things.
185
00:07:09.860 --> 00:07:12.840
It's like um, or lock it into a kind of one
186
00:07:12.840 --> 00:07:14.960
to one orbit with the Earth's orbit around
187
00:07:14.960 --> 00:07:16.640
the sun. So we only ever see it as a very
188
00:07:16.640 --> 00:07:18.360
thin crescent. So it can be beautiful in the
189
00:07:18.360 --> 00:07:20.160
early evening, then bugger off so I can see
190
00:07:20.160 --> 00:07:20.960
the prettier things.
191
00:07:21.200 --> 00:07:23.760
Andrew Dunkley: I can tell you why that's a problem. It's
192
00:07:23.760 --> 00:07:26.400
because everybody likes mooning in photos.
193
00:07:26.880 --> 00:07:27.840
Jonti Horner: Oh, totally.
194
00:07:29.360 --> 00:07:31.140
Andrew Dunkley: Uh, dear. Uh, um,
195
00:07:32.440 --> 00:07:34.400
um, I just thought about the
196
00:07:35.360 --> 00:07:38.060
physical effect of the light being
197
00:07:38.060 --> 00:07:40.940
turned off. But yeah, I didn't consider the
198
00:07:40.940 --> 00:07:43.460
atmosphere or the location or,
199
00:07:43.780 --> 00:07:46.700
um, or your eyes adjusting. I just had
200
00:07:46.700 --> 00:07:48.740
a look at that light pollution map website
201
00:07:48.820 --> 00:07:51.300
and I've honed in on Duo where I am
202
00:07:51.860 --> 00:07:54.580
now. If I just look at the nearest
203
00:07:54.580 --> 00:07:57.140
towns, yeah, I'd have to go just a bit over
204
00:07:57.140 --> 00:08:00.060
20km out of town to get to a
205
00:08:00.060 --> 00:08:02.580
dark sky area which is not too bad. But if,
206
00:08:02.580 --> 00:08:04.980
if you're in Sydney, forget it.
207
00:08:05.300 --> 00:08:07.060
You're gonna have to drive a few hours.
208
00:08:07.860 --> 00:08:10.500
Jonti Horner: But do yourself a favor and zoom out and then
209
00:08:10.500 --> 00:08:13.420
look at the eastern half of the US or look at
210
00:08:13.420 --> 00:08:15.820
eastern Asia and you'll see why we are so.
211
00:08:15.820 --> 00:08:18.740
Let's go. Yeah. That's why
212
00:08:18.740 --> 00:08:21.180
astro tourism's such a growing thing for us
213
00:08:21.180 --> 00:08:23.820
here in Australia. Because even in the big
214
00:08:23.820 --> 00:08:26.340
cities, you know, I moved to Sydney in 2010
215
00:08:26.740 --> 00:08:29.380
and lived very briefly in a
216
00:08:29.460 --> 00:08:31.900
hotel right in the center of Sydney, the most
217
00:08:31.900 --> 00:08:34.510
light polluted part. But I could still see
218
00:08:34.510 --> 00:08:36.430
the Milky Way from the roof of the hotel
219
00:08:37.070 --> 00:08:38.750
because our skies are so good. There's a
220
00:08:38.750 --> 00:08:40.180
couple of factors there. One is that, uh,
221
00:08:40.990 --> 00:08:42.870
Sydney itself puts out a lot of light, but
222
00:08:42.870 --> 00:08:44.470
there's not much else around. So if you're
223
00:08:44.470 --> 00:08:46.510
looking away from Sydney over towards the
224
00:08:46.510 --> 00:08:48.430
ocean, you're looking towards darker skies.
225
00:08:48.830 --> 00:08:51.270
So that helps. But the other thing is, and
226
00:08:51.270 --> 00:08:53.430
this ties into why we get sunburnt so easily
227
00:08:53.430 --> 00:08:55.950
in Australia, the air is just clearer.
228
00:08:56.510 --> 00:08:58.150
So I moved to Australia and everybody said,
229
00:08:58.150 --> 00:08:59.550
you're going to get burnt by the sun and it's
230
00:08:59.550 --> 00:09:02.010
awful. And my first thought was that's the
231
00:09:02.010 --> 00:09:04.450
ozone hole. Because I thought Australia was
232
00:09:04.450 --> 00:09:06.050
further south because I'm used to our
233
00:09:06.050 --> 00:09:09.050
corrupted maps that show the southern
234
00:09:09.050 --> 00:09:10.690
hemisphere wrong. And so Australia looks like
235
00:09:10.690 --> 00:09:12.130
it's near Antarctica and Australia is
236
00:09:12.130 --> 00:09:13.890
actually near the equator. It's. Yeah, it is.
237
00:09:14.130 --> 00:09:16.770
So it's not the ozone hole at all. But I told
238
00:09:16.770 --> 00:09:18.490
some people it's actually due to the fact
239
00:09:18.490 --> 00:09:21.210
that the air in Australia has a much lower
240
00:09:21.210 --> 00:09:23.730
amount of particulates in than any other
241
00:09:23.730 --> 00:09:26.250
continent to do with what's on the interior
242
00:09:26.250 --> 00:09:27.570
of the continent to do with the fact there's
243
00:09:27.570 --> 00:09:29.680
less pollution. So that means there's less to
244
00:09:29.680 --> 00:09:32.280
scatter the solar uv, which is why we get
245
00:09:32.280 --> 00:09:34.480
higher UV indices and therefore more sunburn.
246
00:09:34.480 --> 00:09:37.120
Um, so it's a quirk of geography rather than
247
00:09:37.120 --> 00:09:39.600
just lots of clear skies, which mean we get
248
00:09:39.600 --> 00:09:42.320
UV indices up to 13 or 14 on a hot
249
00:09:42.320 --> 00:09:45.160
summer's day and basically you fry to a crisp
250
00:09:45.160 --> 00:09:46.200
very, very quickly.
251
00:09:46.520 --> 00:09:48.220
What that means for astronomy though is that,
252
00:09:48.220 --> 00:09:50.480
uh, for a given place with a given, given
253
00:09:50.480 --> 00:09:53.400
amount of lighting, we actually get a better
254
00:09:53.400 --> 00:09:55.640
sky than we would do in other places because
255
00:09:55.640 --> 00:09:58.160
there's less to scatter that light. So that
256
00:09:58.160 --> 00:10:00.240
same amount of lighting has a slightly lower
257
00:10:00.240 --> 00:10:02.880
impact. Um, one of the story that ties into
258
00:10:02.880 --> 00:10:04.600
this that I always remember one of the big
259
00:10:04.600 --> 00:10:06.640
hurricanes probably 20 or 30 years ago
260
00:10:06.960 --> 00:10:09.040
knocked out the power across great swathes
261
00:10:09.040 --> 00:10:11.640
of, I think it was Florida. And many people
262
00:10:11.640 --> 00:10:13.519
saw the Milky Way for the very first time in
263
00:10:13.519 --> 00:10:15.240
their lives. And there was panic. People were
264
00:10:15.240 --> 00:10:17.600
actually calling up, uh, their local police.
265
00:10:17.680 --> 00:10:20.520
Oh, I remember this because they thought that
266
00:10:20.520 --> 00:10:22.440
the aliens were coming because the sky looked
267
00:10:22.440 --> 00:10:23.760
so weird and unusual because there were all
268
00:10:23.760 --> 00:10:25.400
these bright points of light in it and this
269
00:10:25.400 --> 00:10:28.210
weird milky glow going across the sky and ah,
270
00:10:28.220 --> 00:10:31.220
we laugh. But it tells you just how decoupled
271
00:10:31.220 --> 00:10:33.060
people are from something that's been so
272
00:10:33.380 --> 00:10:35.700
wonderfully culturally significant for all of
273
00:10:35.700 --> 00:10:37.700
our history. It's so important to the
274
00:10:37.700 --> 00:10:38.940
traditional owners of the land here in
275
00:10:38.940 --> 00:10:41.180
Australia, but also all around the world who
276
00:10:41.180 --> 00:10:42.980
have this deep and intimate connection to the
277
00:10:42.980 --> 00:10:45.540
night sky. And an event like that
278
00:10:46.180 --> 00:10:48.220
really drills home the damage we've done and
279
00:10:48.220 --> 00:10:51.100
how we've removed this. And I'm always
280
00:10:51.100 --> 00:10:53.700
amazed at the reluctance of people in kind of
281
00:10:53.700 --> 00:10:55.780
groups on social media to accept that light
282
00:10:55.780 --> 00:10:58.090
pollution is a problem because can lay odds
283
00:10:58.090 --> 00:10:59.930
at the same problem who say, don't be grumpy,
284
00:10:59.930 --> 00:11:02.370
we need our lights at night to see would be
285
00:11:02.370 --> 00:11:05.130
really, really unpleasantly happy if we have
286
00:11:05.130 --> 00:11:07.410
the same level of noise pollution. If they
287
00:11:07.410 --> 00:11:09.970
had their neighbors kicking out AC DC at 1am
288
00:11:09.970 --> 00:11:12.250
in the morning, they'd be kicking off to the
289
00:11:12.250 --> 00:11:14.490
council. And it seems that we view light
290
00:11:14.490 --> 00:11:17.090
pollution a lot less seriously than we view
291
00:11:17.410 --> 00:11:19.330
sound pollution or other forms of pollution.
292
00:11:19.330 --> 00:11:21.730
And that's changing a bit. But
293
00:11:22.370 --> 00:11:24.250
there's also an energy source side of it, I
294
00:11:24.250 --> 00:11:25.850
mean this is a bit that always makes my head
295
00:11:25.850 --> 00:11:27.770
hurt is if you're throwing 30% of your light
296
00:11:27.770 --> 00:11:30.570
up into the sky, you're wasting 30% of your
297
00:11:30.570 --> 00:11:32.290
electricity and you're therefore just burning
298
00:11:32.290 --> 00:11:35.090
money. And yeah, I'm sure the energy
299
00:11:35.090 --> 00:11:36.610
companies love that because they get bigger
300
00:11:36.610 --> 00:11:39.490
profits. But doesn't seem a very efficient
301
00:11:39.490 --> 00:11:40.410
way to do things.
302
00:11:40.570 --> 00:11:42.850
Andrew Dunkley: No. And when you look at the map, uh, Eastern
303
00:11:42.850 --> 00:11:44.690
United States, basically all the United
304
00:11:44.690 --> 00:11:46.570
States, but particularly the eastern half.
305
00:11:46.650 --> 00:11:49.290
Western Europe, uh, East Asia,
306
00:11:49.600 --> 00:11:52.380
um, and even the east, uh, eastern
307
00:11:52.380 --> 00:11:54.900
half of South America pretty well just
308
00:11:55.460 --> 00:11:58.260
light pollution. Central. Yeah. But you look
309
00:11:58.260 --> 00:12:00.440
at Australia and um,
310
00:12:00.900 --> 00:12:03.340
parts of North Africa, uh,
311
00:12:03.340 --> 00:12:05.539
Greenland, although it's an ice cap so it
312
00:12:05.539 --> 00:12:07.620
makes it a bit difficult. But uh, even the
313
00:12:07.680 --> 00:12:10.540
um, uh, big areas around Russia
314
00:12:10.540 --> 00:12:13.460
and Siberia, uh, complete darkness.
315
00:12:13.620 --> 00:12:16.510
Which is, you know, very good
316
00:12:16.510 --> 00:12:18.910
place to, to go if you. Well probably not
317
00:12:18.910 --> 00:12:21.230
Russia at the moment but um, good places to
318
00:12:21.230 --> 00:12:23.910
go to look at the sky and in terms of air
319
00:12:23.910 --> 00:12:26.390
quality. Um, they did a test a few years ago
320
00:12:26.390 --> 00:12:28.830
and found that the most pure air in the world
321
00:12:28.830 --> 00:12:31.590
crosses Tasmania and southern
322
00:12:31.590 --> 00:12:31.870
Australia.
323
00:12:33.070 --> 00:12:34.990
Jonti Horner: Which sounds about right. But it is why there
324
00:12:34.990 --> 00:12:37.870
is a growing interest in astro tourism
325
00:12:37.870 --> 00:12:39.830
in Australia. I've spoken to a few people
326
00:12:39.830 --> 00:12:42.480
about this in the last 12 months where local
327
00:12:42.480 --> 00:12:43.800
councils and
328
00:12:45.320 --> 00:12:47.480
different commercial groups are looking at
329
00:12:47.480 --> 00:12:49.960
adding astronomy activities to their
330
00:12:49.960 --> 00:12:52.320
offerings because they're aware that for
331
00:12:52.320 --> 00:12:55.120
people coming in from a lot of our places,
332
00:12:55.120 --> 00:12:57.280
um, that source tourists to Australia. These
333
00:12:57.280 --> 00:12:58.800
are people who've never seen the Milky Way,
334
00:12:58.800 --> 00:13:01.240
who've never seen the night sky properly. And
335
00:13:01.240 --> 00:13:03.800
to them it's this kind of romantic ideal that
336
00:13:03.960 --> 00:13:06.240
they could have a night lying under the stars
337
00:13:06.240 --> 00:13:09.240
and see the Milky Way above them. And that's
338
00:13:09.240 --> 00:13:10.640
just the reality here. You know, I step
339
00:13:10.640 --> 00:13:12.440
outside in my backyard and I see the Milky
340
00:13:12.440 --> 00:13:15.280
Way and that makes it a really big
341
00:13:15.280 --> 00:13:17.040
tourist drawer. And people are cottoning onto
342
00:13:17.040 --> 00:13:19.320
that. And that will then be extra ammunition
343
00:13:19.320 --> 00:13:21.160
for us improving lighting laws in Australia.
344
00:13:21.640 --> 00:13:23.160
Because there's an interest beyond just
345
00:13:23.160 --> 00:13:25.640
astronomers. There's a commercial interest to
346
00:13:25.640 --> 00:13:27.280
drive that. So I think it's a real positive
347
00:13:27.280 --> 00:13:29.360
thing. And um, yeah, we'll see more of it.
348
00:13:29.360 --> 00:13:32.360
But in the meantime, roll on the EMP purse.
349
00:13:33.160 --> 00:13:35.360
Andrew Dunkley: Yes, indeed. Uh, thanks for the question
350
00:13:35.360 --> 00:13:37.760
mark. See what you've done. Good, uh, to hear
351
00:13:37.760 --> 00:13:38.040
from.
352
00:13:40.900 --> 00:13:42.140
Jonti Horner: Roger. Your lab is right here.
353
00:13:42.140 --> 00:13:44.740
Andrew Dunkley: Also Space Nuts. This is Space Nuts with
354
00:13:44.740 --> 00:13:46.220
Andrew Dunkley and Jonti Horner.
355
00:13:46.220 --> 00:13:48.500
Our next question comes from
356
00:13:48.900 --> 00:13:50.340
Doug. It's an audio question.
357
00:13:50.420 --> 00:13:52.780
Speaker C: Hi Space Nuts, it's Doug and Hazel the
358
00:13:52.780 --> 00:13:55.420
Wonderdoodle calling again. Thank you for
359
00:13:55.420 --> 00:13:57.860
your responses to my previous questions.
360
00:13:58.180 --> 00:14:00.020
My question this time is about
361
00:14:00.740 --> 00:14:03.740
uh, blocking sunlight. Given that
362
00:14:03.740 --> 00:14:06.740
we as humanity have no ability to
363
00:14:06.740 --> 00:14:08.900
control our carbon emissions, it seems.
364
00:14:09.400 --> 00:14:12.290
Um, the next question is to me,
365
00:14:12.560 --> 00:14:14.450
uh, is geoengineering possible?
366
00:14:15.330 --> 00:14:18.250
Now, given that, uh, seed
367
00:14:18.250 --> 00:14:20.730
in the higher atmosphere with reflective
368
00:14:20.730 --> 00:14:23.410
particles would probably not go over too well
369
00:14:23.410 --> 00:14:25.970
with the, uh, chemtrails people.
370
00:14:26.530 --> 00:14:29.370
I'm going to suggest that, uh, putting
371
00:14:29.370 --> 00:14:32.130
some sort of sun blocker out at Lagrange
372
00:14:32.610 --> 00:14:35.290
point one, uh, would be
373
00:14:35.290 --> 00:14:38.290
a solution that would probably need to be
374
00:14:38.290 --> 00:14:40.650
investigated. Um, ChatGPT
375
00:14:40.810 --> 00:14:43.450
suggested that a 3 million square
376
00:14:43.450 --> 00:14:46.370
meter parasol, for lack of a better word,
377
00:14:46.370 --> 00:14:49.170
would block 1% of the sun's light
378
00:14:49.170 --> 00:14:51.490
hitting the Earth. Don't, um, know what the
379
00:14:51.490 --> 00:14:53.850
magic number is. Don't know if we should even
380
00:14:53.850 --> 00:14:56.410
do this. But the question I have is
381
00:14:56.970 --> 00:14:59.890
does anybody know about anybody working on
382
00:14:59.890 --> 00:15:02.340
this particular program right now
383
00:15:02.900 --> 00:15:05.380
as uh, a contingency? Thanks very much.
384
00:15:06.100 --> 00:15:06.900
Have a good day.
385
00:15:07.220 --> 00:15:09.140
Andrew Dunkley: You too, Doug. Thank you. And hello to Hazel
386
00:15:09.140 --> 00:15:12.140
the Wonder Doodle. Uh, this has come
387
00:15:12.140 --> 00:15:14.620
up before and I do think somebody has been
388
00:15:14.620 --> 00:15:17.380
looking into the possibility of putting a
389
00:15:17.380 --> 00:15:19.900
parasol in space to try and uh,
390
00:15:19.900 --> 00:15:22.740
shade Earth. Um, I
391
00:15:22.900 --> 00:15:24.580
just don't know how well it would work.
392
00:15:25.700 --> 00:15:28.090
Jonti Horner: It's a challenge. I mean it, it, the reason
393
00:15:28.090 --> 00:15:29.890
I'm chuckling a little bit in the background
394
00:15:29.890 --> 00:15:31.690
here is not actually about this idea, which I
395
00:15:31.690 --> 00:15:33.930
think is a good one. It's hazel the wind area
396
00:15:33.930 --> 00:15:34.530
as well, isn't it?
397
00:15:34.530 --> 00:15:35.450
Andrew Dunkley: That's what's making you chuckle.
398
00:15:35.450 --> 00:15:37.010
Jonti Horner: It's not even Hazel the Wonder Doodle. It
399
00:15:37.010 --> 00:15:39.250
just amuses me that on the one hand we're
400
00:15:39.250 --> 00:15:41.170
talking here about building parasols to
401
00:15:41.170 --> 00:15:43.729
shield the sun from the daytime sky, while at
402
00:15:43.729 --> 00:15:45.450
the same time a few weeks ago we talked about
403
00:15:45.450 --> 00:15:47.290
a group of idiots with a startup in
404
00:15:47.290 --> 00:15:49.010
California to reflect the sun to shine it on
405
00:15:49.010 --> 00:15:51.930
the night times. And I've got visions of
406
00:15:51.930 --> 00:15:53.370
the fact that you get these wonderful geo
407
00:15:53.370 --> 00:15:56.170
engineers deliberately shielding blocking
408
00:15:56.170 --> 00:15:58.010
sunlight from the daylight sky only to have
409
00:15:58.010 --> 00:15:59.810
their work undone by a group of equally
410
00:15:59.810 --> 00:16:02.370
stupid people shining, um, lights on the
411
00:16:02.370 --> 00:16:04.130
nighttime sky to just basically make the
412
00:16:04.130 --> 00:16:06.410
nights hotter and offset all of the good
413
00:16:06.410 --> 00:16:08.850
work. Um, but that's more me chuckling at the
414
00:16:08.850 --> 00:16:10.810
idiocy of reflector orbital than it is about
415
00:16:10.810 --> 00:16:12.010
this question. Because this is actually a
416
00:16:12.010 --> 00:16:14.290
really good question, Doug. It is
417
00:16:14.690 --> 00:16:17.650
abundantly clear, um, that.
418
00:16:17.810 --> 00:16:19.410
Okay, don't mind me. I just got a weird pop
419
00:16:19.410 --> 00:16:21.890
up saying I'm going to expire
420
00:16:22.260 --> 00:16:24.220
after 150 minutes of inactivity, which is
421
00:16:24.220 --> 00:16:25.980
never good. But I don't think that's to do
422
00:16:25.980 --> 00:16:27.780
with space nuts. So I've just moved my mouse
423
00:16:27.780 --> 00:16:30.460
and all is good. So I am not going wake spire
424
00:16:30.460 --> 00:16:32.260
live on air. This is good. Yeah.
425
00:16:32.420 --> 00:16:35.100
So there is fundamentally an issue that the
426
00:16:35.100 --> 00:16:37.540
planet is warming and the planet is warming
427
00:16:37.620 --> 00:16:40.100
because of human activities. And that is
428
00:16:41.060 --> 00:16:43.340
not open, uh, for dispute really anymore. I
429
00:16:43.340 --> 00:16:44.940
know that there are a variety of opinions
430
00:16:44.940 --> 00:16:46.300
available on this, but for me as an
431
00:16:46.300 --> 00:16:48.710
astronomer, the evidence is utterly
432
00:16:48.710 --> 00:16:51.110
overwhelming. And the only thing that can
433
00:16:51.110 --> 00:16:53.270
explain the changes that we're seeing, not
434
00:16:53.270 --> 00:16:55.270
the size of the changes, but the speed of the
435
00:16:55.270 --> 00:16:57.550
changes, is human activity. No
436
00:16:57.870 --> 00:17:00.710
physical process, other than perhaps a
437
00:17:00.710 --> 00:17:03.150
rock hitting the Earth and killing everybody,
438
00:17:03.450 --> 00:17:05.270
um, like the dinosaur level extinction, there
439
00:17:05.270 --> 00:17:07.870
is nothing else that could cause this rate of
440
00:17:07.870 --> 00:17:10.470
change. So it's very, very clear that human
441
00:17:10.470 --> 00:17:13.110
activity is the cause of this and, um, that
442
00:17:13.110 --> 00:17:14.950
there is some inertia in trying to persuade
443
00:17:14.950 --> 00:17:16.590
humans to stop doing the things that cause
444
00:17:16.590 --> 00:17:18.900
the problems and understand that. So there's
445
00:17:18.900 --> 00:17:21.500
a growing list of suggestions of ways that we
446
00:17:21.500 --> 00:17:23.700
could mitigate for climate change out there.
447
00:17:24.020 --> 00:17:26.980
One, as Doug said, is sprinkling reflective
448
00:17:26.980 --> 00:17:28.700
particles into the upper atmosphere to
449
00:17:28.700 --> 00:17:31.280
effectively increase the Earth's albedo, uh,
450
00:17:31.280 --> 00:17:33.380
which would mean more energy was reflected to
451
00:17:33.380 --> 00:17:35.260
space and less makes it down to the surface
452
00:17:35.260 --> 00:17:37.660
of the Earth to kind of heat the pressure
453
00:17:37.660 --> 00:17:40.460
cooker. And that could
454
00:17:40.460 --> 00:17:42.460
possibly work. It'll be interesting to see
455
00:17:42.460 --> 00:17:44.900
what role SpaceX plays in that in the years
456
00:17:44.900 --> 00:17:47.680
to come, because with all of the satellites
457
00:17:47.680 --> 00:17:50.190
they're launching, there's a growing, um,
458
00:17:50.190 --> 00:17:51.800
number of things returning to Earth and
459
00:17:51.800 --> 00:17:53.880
burning up in the upper atmosphere that are
460
00:17:53.880 --> 00:17:56.040
depositing metals like aluminum into the
461
00:17:56.040 --> 00:17:58.160
upper atmosphere. And nobody's really sure
462
00:17:58.160 --> 00:18:00.320
what's going to happen there. So that might
463
00:18:00.320 --> 00:18:02.760
actually inadvertently do exactly what Doug
464
00:18:02.760 --> 00:18:05.600
mentioned and increase the Earth's albedo
465
00:18:05.760 --> 00:18:08.040
and offset some climate change, or it might
466
00:18:08.040 --> 00:18:09.600
make it worse. People are still trying to
467
00:18:09.600 --> 00:18:11.590
figure out what's going to happen there. And
468
00:18:11.590 --> 00:18:13.910
that ties into the idea that space is still a
469
00:18:13.910 --> 00:18:16.190
little bit of the wild, Wild west, in that
470
00:18:16.190 --> 00:18:19.070
things are happening faster than legislation
471
00:18:19.070 --> 00:18:21.310
can adapt. You know, we've got tons of
472
00:18:21.310 --> 00:18:23.270
aluminium being added to the atmosphere and
473
00:18:23.270 --> 00:18:25.230
we don't know what it's going to do, but that
474
00:18:25.230 --> 00:18:27.990
might have part of this effect. But an
475
00:18:27.990 --> 00:18:30.710
obvious way that you could cool the Earth is
476
00:18:30.710 --> 00:18:33.190
by blocking some sunlight. Fundamentally,
477
00:18:33.190 --> 00:18:35.030
that makes sense. If you block 1% of the
478
00:18:35.030 --> 00:18:37.350
sun's light, you block 1% of the energy
479
00:18:37.350 --> 00:18:39.470
coming into the Earth, which will be about
480
00:18:39.470 --> 00:18:41.710
13.6 watts. The solar constant's about
481
00:18:41.710 --> 00:18:44.260
1360 watts per square meter. Block, uh,
482
00:18:44.510 --> 00:18:47.430
1% of that, that will be 13.6 watts,
483
00:18:47.430 --> 00:18:49.310
and that will be more than enough to offset
484
00:18:49.390 --> 00:18:52.390
climate change and probably more so. But
485
00:18:52.390 --> 00:18:54.589
let's say we wanted to block 1% of the light
486
00:18:54.589 --> 00:18:56.710
from the sun. That means you would need a
487
00:18:56.710 --> 00:18:59.670
parasol that is equal to 1% of the
488
00:18:59.670 --> 00:19:01.070
cross section of the Earth, Uh, if that
489
00:19:01.310 --> 00:19:03.590
parasol blocked all of the light from the sun
490
00:19:03.590 --> 00:19:05.870
that was hitting it. So that means
491
00:19:06.190 --> 00:19:08.790
1% of the Earth's surface would be dark. The
492
00:19:08.790 --> 00:19:11.550
sun wouldn't be falling on it. Or you diffuse
493
00:19:11.550 --> 00:19:14.110
that, and, um, you have 1% less light coming
494
00:19:14.110 --> 00:19:16.750
down. So if you do the maths of that. The
495
00:19:16.750 --> 00:19:19.390
Earth has a radius
496
00:19:19.550 --> 00:19:22.070
of about 6,378
497
00:19:22.070 --> 00:19:24.670
kilometers. That varies because the Earth's a
498
00:19:24.670 --> 00:19:26.910
bit ablate. So the radius from pole to pole
499
00:19:27.150 --> 00:19:29.590
is different to the radius across the
500
00:19:29.590 --> 00:19:31.750
equator. But we can use that as a mean
501
00:19:31.750 --> 00:19:34.710
radius. That means that the Earth, uh, has a
502
00:19:34.710 --> 00:19:37.710
surface area of about 10, 1.9,
503
00:19:37.710 --> 00:19:39.630
I think it was, times 10 to the 14
504
00:19:40.510 --> 00:19:43.150
meters squared. So to
505
00:19:43.150 --> 00:19:46.070
block 1% of the light, you'd need a
506
00:19:46.070 --> 00:19:49.030
parasol. That is 1% of that. So that would be
507
00:19:49.030 --> 00:19:51.910
about 1, um, point 28 times 10 to
508
00:19:51.910 --> 00:19:54.910
the 12 meters squared. Which means
509
00:19:54.910 --> 00:19:57.310
that you will need a parasol. I'm sorry,
510
00:19:57.310 --> 00:19:58.590
kilometers squared. I've done this
511
00:19:58.590 --> 00:20:01.110
calculation in kilometers, um, which would.
512
00:20:01.430 --> 00:20:03.510
No, that is in meters, sorry. Which would
513
00:20:03.510 --> 00:20:06.030
mean you'd need a parasol if you made it
514
00:20:06.030 --> 00:20:08.150
Square. That is
515
00:20:08.230 --> 00:20:10.990
1130 kilometers on a
516
00:20:10.990 --> 00:20:11.270
side
517
00:20:13.750 --> 00:20:16.710
that I think is technologically beyond us at
518
00:20:16.710 --> 00:20:19.190
the minute. Um, added to which,
519
00:20:19.590 --> 00:20:21.550
you know that the politicians would want us
520
00:20:21.550 --> 00:20:23.310
to mine that material on Earth and launch it
521
00:20:23.310 --> 00:20:25.340
because that would be more profitable. So the
522
00:20:25.340 --> 00:20:26.940
process of mining and launching all that
523
00:20:26.940 --> 00:20:29.700
material to build 1,000 kilometers on each
524
00:20:29.700 --> 00:20:32.340
side. Parasol Will probably put far more
525
00:20:32.420 --> 00:20:34.180
greenhouse gases into the atmosphere and
526
00:20:34.180 --> 00:20:36.540
exacerbate the problem. The other challenge
527
00:20:36.540 --> 00:20:38.300
you'd have with the parasol issue, though, is
528
00:20:38.300 --> 00:20:40.580
that the L1 point, which would be the obvious
529
00:20:40.580 --> 00:20:43.100
place to put it, that's a point between the
530
00:20:43.100 --> 00:20:45.460
Earth and the Sun. Where an object would
531
00:20:45.460 --> 00:20:47.340
rotate at the same orbital period as the
532
00:20:47.340 --> 00:20:49.420
Earth. And, um, be in this kind of semi
533
00:20:49.420 --> 00:20:51.100
stable location. That's where a lot of our
534
00:20:51.100 --> 00:20:53.700
solar observation spacecraft go, like soho,
535
00:20:53.910 --> 00:20:55.590
to give us early warning of space weather.
536
00:20:56.150 --> 00:20:59.110
Now, the L1 point is about 1.5 million
537
00:20:59.110 --> 00:21:01.750
kilometers away. Things at
538
00:21:01.750 --> 00:21:04.150
L1 are not fully stable. So they need rockets
539
00:21:04.150 --> 00:21:05.990
and actuators to keep them on point. Because
540
00:21:05.990 --> 00:21:08.270
if they drift too far away, they'll fall out
541
00:21:08.270 --> 00:21:10.830
of the stable area and go off orbiting the
542
00:21:10.830 --> 00:21:13.350
sun on the rock. So what you need to do is
543
00:21:13.350 --> 00:21:16.310
have an object 1,000 kilometers on each
544
00:21:16.310 --> 00:21:18.790
side. Located one and a half million
545
00:21:18.790 --> 00:21:21.440
kilometers away. That could be positioned
546
00:21:21.440 --> 00:21:23.680
accurately enough that the shadow it casts
547
00:21:23.760 --> 00:21:26.680
hits a target 6,300 km
548
00:21:26.680 --> 00:21:29.120
in radius rather than missing us. So as it
549
00:21:29.120 --> 00:21:31.200
drifts around, we'd have to keep it on point
550
00:21:31.680 --> 00:21:33.720
to an accuracy of just a few hundred
551
00:21:33.720 --> 00:21:36.119
kilometers. And so this is one of those
552
00:21:36.119 --> 00:21:38.000
things where it's a fabulous idea for science
553
00:21:38.000 --> 00:21:40.440
fiction and it is the kind of thing where we
554
00:21:40.440 --> 00:21:42.760
can imagine all of the steps we need to take
555
00:21:42.760 --> 00:21:44.920
to make it work. So it's within the bounds of
556
00:21:44.920 --> 00:21:47.860
our technology in terms of our ability to
557
00:21:47.860 --> 00:21:50.660
make stuff, but it's the scale of it that
558
00:21:50.660 --> 00:21:53.580
makes it impractical. And that's why a
559
00:21:53.580 --> 00:21:56.020
lot of these ideas of parasols
560
00:21:56.420 --> 00:21:59.180
fall down, is that the amount of area
561
00:21:59.180 --> 00:22:01.140
you'd have to cover to block enough light to
562
00:22:01.140 --> 00:22:03.780
make it feasible are so huge that it's just
563
00:22:03.780 --> 00:22:06.460
technologically the building of them and the
564
00:22:06.460 --> 00:22:08.180
keeping them on point will be too much of a
565
00:22:08.180 --> 00:22:10.780
challenge. It be a global endeavor that would
566
00:22:10.780 --> 00:22:13.700
make the efforts for the Apollo missions seem
567
00:22:13.700 --> 00:22:16.140
like tiny little small fry in comparison.
568
00:22:16.540 --> 00:22:18.940
I don't know if anybody's ever done a
569
00:22:18.940 --> 00:22:21.420
calculation of the cost that this would have.
570
00:22:22.050 --> 00:22:23.420
Um, but I suspect there are other
571
00:22:23.420 --> 00:22:26.100
geoengineering ideas that will be more
572
00:22:26.100 --> 00:22:28.160
financially feasible. Uh,
573
00:22:29.340 --> 00:22:31.260
I'm always an optimist. I mean, I am very
574
00:22:31.260 --> 00:22:32.940
worried, like everybody is, about climate
575
00:22:32.940 --> 00:22:35.140
change. I have been since I was a kid. I've
576
00:22:35.140 --> 00:22:38.140
lived in places where it is writ large on
577
00:22:38.140 --> 00:22:39.820
the landscape. I always talk about when I
578
00:22:39.820 --> 00:22:41.180
lived in Switzerland, and they've got
579
00:22:41.180 --> 00:22:43.550
photographs from mid summer, uh, in all these
580
00:22:43.550 --> 00:22:45.870
little Alpine villages of the glacier just
581
00:22:45.870 --> 00:22:47.830
behind the village. Evening, midsummer. And
582
00:22:47.830 --> 00:22:49.430
then you step outside and you can't see the
583
00:22:49.430 --> 00:22:51.230
glacier because it's retreated so far up the
584
00:22:51.230 --> 00:22:53.950
mountains it's no longer in view. So I've
585
00:22:53.950 --> 00:22:56.550
lived in places where it's obvious. But I'm
586
00:22:56.550 --> 00:22:58.670
always of the idea that eventually human
587
00:22:58.670 --> 00:23:01.560
ingenuity and commercial, um,
588
00:23:01.560 --> 00:23:03.630
interests will get to the point where it is
589
00:23:04.110 --> 00:23:06.030
something we'll solve. And I think we're
590
00:23:06.030 --> 00:23:07.950
seeing that a bit now with electric cars.
591
00:23:07.950 --> 00:23:10.330
We've had the technology to have electric
592
00:23:10.330 --> 00:23:12.490
vehicles for more than 100 years. I remember
593
00:23:12.570 --> 00:23:14.730
getting milk delivered by the milkman as a
594
00:23:14.730 --> 00:23:16.210
kid. And, uh, they were going around in
595
00:23:16.210 --> 00:23:18.130
electric milk carts, you know, so we have
596
00:23:18.130 --> 00:23:21.090
that technology even then. But for a long
597
00:23:21.090 --> 00:23:22.970
time nobody's had electric cars, nobody's
598
00:23:22.970 --> 00:23:25.250
considered it solvable. But eventually the
599
00:23:25.250 --> 00:23:26.650
costs have dropped enough that they're a
600
00:23:26.650 --> 00:23:28.370
viable alternative and now people are taking
601
00:23:28.370 --> 00:23:30.410
them up. So you're seeing a drop in the
602
00:23:30.410 --> 00:23:32.890
number of petrol vehicles. And I'd like to
603
00:23:32.890 --> 00:23:35.130
think that because a lot of the things that
604
00:23:35.130 --> 00:23:37.010
we do to cause climate change are
605
00:23:37.010 --> 00:23:39.440
fundamentally inefficient, as our technology
606
00:23:39.600 --> 00:23:42.120
improves, we'll move to much more
607
00:23:42.120 --> 00:23:44.320
efficient processes that generate less of the
608
00:23:44.320 --> 00:23:46.600
things that cause climate change. And, uh, we
609
00:23:46.600 --> 00:23:48.360
will find a solution. But the problem is the
610
00:23:48.360 --> 00:23:50.920
lag time is such that the longer we wait, the
611
00:23:50.920 --> 00:23:52.760
worse it's going to get before it gets better
612
00:23:52.760 --> 00:23:54.880
again. And there are some suggestions that,
613
00:23:54.880 --> 00:23:57.120
for example, the horrendous hurricane that
614
00:23:57.360 --> 00:24:00.320
hit Jamaica last week was significantly
615
00:24:00.320 --> 00:24:02.000
worse because of the effect of climate change
616
00:24:02.000 --> 00:24:03.920
on the temperatures of the water. There's now
617
00:24:03.920 --> 00:24:06.160
actually a whole branch of mathematical
618
00:24:06.160 --> 00:24:08.730
science that delves into
619
00:24:09.690 --> 00:24:12.530
calculating not a yes, no did climate change
620
00:24:12.530 --> 00:24:15.450
cause this event, but rather a statistical
621
00:24:15.450 --> 00:24:18.130
analysis of how much worse was this
622
00:24:18.130 --> 00:24:20.930
event as a result of the effects of climate
623
00:24:20.930 --> 00:24:22.970
change. And I think the numbers for that
624
00:24:22.970 --> 00:24:25.930
hurricane last week were quite startling
625
00:24:25.930 --> 00:24:28.570
that it was made noticeably worse because of
626
00:24:28.570 --> 00:24:30.130
the increased heating of the ocean and all
627
00:24:30.130 --> 00:24:32.170
the rest of it. Yeah, it is a real problem
628
00:24:32.170 --> 00:24:34.140
with. We want to get solutions, but I think
629
00:24:34.140 --> 00:24:35.940
the parasol is a bit too hard.
630
00:24:36.020 --> 00:24:38.420
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah, I did read the science behind why that
631
00:24:38.420 --> 00:24:40.860
storm was so severe and it was quite an
632
00:24:40.860 --> 00:24:42.660
interesting read. And I won't go into it now
633
00:24:42.660 --> 00:24:44.260
because I probably get half of it wrong.
634
00:24:44.260 --> 00:24:47.220
But, um, you might also be interested,
635
00:24:47.220 --> 00:24:49.620
Doug, to know that there have been some
636
00:24:49.860 --> 00:24:52.340
researchers looking into this. Not just
637
00:24:53.140 --> 00:24:56.100
maybe a single object in space to,
638
00:24:56.500 --> 00:24:59.260
to block the sun. But University, uh, of
639
00:24:59.260 --> 00:25:01.700
Arizona was looking at a, uh, cloud of small
640
00:25:02.080 --> 00:25:04.560
spacecraft. Uh, there was another research,
641
00:25:05.310 --> 00:25:08.150
uh, effort at mit, uh,
642
00:25:08.150 --> 00:25:10.930
looking at inflatable space bubbles. Uh,
643
00:25:10.930 --> 00:25:13.600
another idea out of the University of Hawaii,
644
00:25:13.810 --> 00:25:16.520
um, tethering shades to an asteroid. The
645
00:25:16.520 --> 00:25:18.320
asteroid being used as a counterweight if
646
00:25:18.320 --> 00:25:19.680
they could capture one. That's another
647
00:25:20.240 --> 00:25:22.480
impossible dream at the moment. Solar sails
648
00:25:22.480 --> 00:25:24.800
and lightweight films and, and even one,
649
00:25:25.590 --> 00:25:27.760
uh, proposed only a couple of years ago was,
650
00:25:27.850 --> 00:25:30.780
um, to start ejecting lunar
651
00:25:30.780 --> 00:25:33.220
dust into space to create
652
00:25:33.940 --> 00:25:36.710
a dust cloud to block the sun. M.
653
00:25:36.710 --> 00:25:39.660
My worry is if we do decide
654
00:25:39.660 --> 00:25:41.740
that that's the solution and we do it and
655
00:25:41.740 --> 00:25:44.180
then we solve the problem of global warming,
656
00:25:45.060 --> 00:25:47.140
won't we then put ourselves in a position
657
00:25:47.220 --> 00:25:50.180
where we could cause, uh, a global
658
00:25:50.180 --> 00:25:50.740
winter?
659
00:25:51.810 --> 00:25:51.970
Jonti Horner: Um.
660
00:25:54.910 --> 00:25:56.990
Andrew Dunkley: Even if we reach a point where we've got the
661
00:25:56.990 --> 00:25:59.710
technology to solve the problem, as
662
00:25:59.710 --> 00:26:01.470
Doug said, should we do it?
663
00:26:01.950 --> 00:26:04.270
Jonti Horner: And we also come to
664
00:26:04.910 --> 00:26:06.670
really interesting questions because
665
00:26:07.150 --> 00:26:10.050
underlying the climate change we've got, um,
666
00:26:10.050 --> 00:26:12.230
there's also the fact that the Earth's, uh,
667
00:26:12.230 --> 00:26:14.110
climate changes naturally on much longer
668
00:26:14.110 --> 00:26:15.430
timescales. We get the glacial and
669
00:26:15.430 --> 00:26:18.310
interglacial periods. So if we ever do get to
670
00:26:18.310 --> 00:26:20.350
the point where we've got climate control,
671
00:26:20.510 --> 00:26:23.510
so. So in other words, we can set the Earth's
672
00:26:23.510 --> 00:26:25.630
climate to be. At a certain point we can fix
673
00:26:25.630 --> 00:26:27.750
a problem. And if we can fix a problem, we
674
00:26:27.750 --> 00:26:29.430
can then say where we want the climate to
675
00:26:29.430 --> 00:26:31.630
sit. What do we choose? Do we allow
676
00:26:32.190 --> 00:26:34.310
that very slow pace of climate change to
677
00:26:34.310 --> 00:26:36.749
happen? Do we figure out the conditions that
678
00:26:36.749 --> 00:26:39.710
are optimal and set it there? There's
679
00:26:39.710 --> 00:26:41.270
a lot of really interesting stuff that would
680
00:26:41.270 --> 00:26:42.910
feed into science fiction rather than science
681
00:26:42.910 --> 00:26:44.590
fact that come from the fact that if you've
682
00:26:44.590 --> 00:26:45.830
got to the point where you can solve the
683
00:26:45.830 --> 00:26:47.890
problem, you've got to the point where you
684
00:26:47.890 --> 00:26:50.130
can geoengineer the Earth's climate to suit.
685
00:26:50.850 --> 00:26:52.850
So where do you therefore set the sweet spot?
686
00:26:52.850 --> 00:26:55.570
Do you set it at uh, the year 2000 mean, the
687
00:26:55.570 --> 00:26:58.330
1900 mean? Do you make it a little bit
688
00:26:58.330 --> 00:26:59.770
cooler than that? Do you make it a little bit
689
00:26:59.770 --> 00:27:01.690
warmer than that? It's a really interesting
690
00:27:01.690 --> 00:27:04.130
one. Which for an incredibly complex and
691
00:27:04.130 --> 00:27:06.810
chaotic system, um, would lead to a lot of
692
00:27:06.810 --> 00:27:09.010
implications about weather disasters and all
693
00:27:09.010 --> 00:27:11.210
the rest of it. Yeah, there's a lot of
694
00:27:11.210 --> 00:27:12.530
interesting stuff there. I think it's going
695
00:27:12.530 --> 00:27:14.050
to be interesting times for the next hundred
696
00:27:14.050 --> 00:27:16.690
or two hundred years as humanity tries to
697
00:27:16.690 --> 00:27:17.930
solve the problems it's made.
698
00:27:18.730 --> 00:27:21.010
Andrew Dunkley: Indeed. Yes. Thank you Doug, Great to hear
699
00:27:21.010 --> 00:27:23.050
from you. Keep them coming. There's some
700
00:27:23.050 --> 00:27:25.490
terrific ideas out there that uh, people want
701
00:27:25.490 --> 00:27:28.490
to learn more about. And this is
702
00:27:28.490 --> 00:27:31.489
Space Nuts with Andrew Dunkley and Jonti
703
00:27:31.489 --> 00:27:32.090
Horner.
704
00:27:36.490 --> 00:27:37.530
Space Nuts.
705
00:27:37.690 --> 00:27:40.170
Our next question, uh, comes from another
706
00:27:40.250 --> 00:27:42.650
YouTuber. Uh, and
707
00:27:42.870 --> 00:27:45.650
uh, the question is who has the salvage
708
00:27:45.650 --> 00:27:48.650
rights on all the scrap satellites and is
709
00:27:48.650 --> 00:27:51.490
there a plan or a uh, map of all the
710
00:27:51.490 --> 00:27:54.130
defunct scrap in orbit? Possibly in the
711
00:27:54.130 --> 00:27:56.490
future there would be good business in
712
00:27:56.490 --> 00:27:58.610
recovering all the precious metals, et
713
00:27:58.610 --> 00:28:00.610
cetera. It's a good question. I know they
714
00:28:00.610 --> 00:28:02.810
were experimenting with different ways of
715
00:28:02.890 --> 00:28:05.860
bringing down defunct satellites, uh,
716
00:28:06.330 --> 00:28:08.610
and all they were doing was like testing
717
00:28:08.610 --> 00:28:11.500
harpoons and things like that or whatever to
718
00:28:11.500 --> 00:28:14.300
make them re enter and burn up. But this is,
719
00:28:14.380 --> 00:28:17.020
this is um, a whole new ball game. Salvage.
720
00:28:17.550 --> 00:28:19.940
Uh, I don't, I haven't heard of it.
721
00:28:19.940 --> 00:28:22.780
Jonti Horner: Have you? It's yet
722
00:28:22.780 --> 00:28:25.580
another area where legislation is not keeping
723
00:28:25.580 --> 00:28:28.540
up with use. So there's a
724
00:28:28.540 --> 00:28:30.940
lot of challenges with this. Space is vastly
725
00:28:30.940 --> 00:28:32.740
big and um, the things we put up there are
726
00:28:32.740 --> 00:28:34.540
very small compared to the size of the space
727
00:28:34.540 --> 00:28:37.270
that's up there. There are a lot of efforts
728
00:28:37.270 --> 00:28:39.750
going on to map and to keep track of all of
729
00:28:39.750 --> 00:28:42.590
the bits of debris, both large scale like
730
00:28:42.590 --> 00:28:44.830
satellites and former rocket bodies, down to
731
00:28:44.830 --> 00:28:46.350
the very small fragments you've got out
732
00:28:46.350 --> 00:28:48.870
there. And that's the whole Area of space,
733
00:28:48.870 --> 00:28:50.670
situational awareness. There's telescopes
734
00:28:50.670 --> 00:28:52.750
around the world tracking debris, keeping it
735
00:28:52.750 --> 00:28:55.750
in databases. And the thing there is
736
00:28:55.750 --> 00:28:57.430
that you can't just assume that once you've
737
00:28:57.430 --> 00:28:58.790
seen it, you know what it's orbit is and
738
00:28:58.790 --> 00:29:00.790
you'll know where it is forevermore, because
739
00:29:00.790 --> 00:29:02.550
it's a complex environment where the Earth's
740
00:29:02.550 --> 00:29:04.230
atmosphere is breathing in and out, getting
741
00:29:04.230 --> 00:29:06.190
bigger and smaller, and the solar wind is
742
00:29:06.190 --> 00:29:08.460
varying. And all these things that happen,
743
00:29:08.460 --> 00:29:11.420
even down to the subtleties of the varying
744
00:29:11.420 --> 00:29:13.500
densities of different parts of the Earth's
745
00:29:13.500 --> 00:29:15.460
surface, causing slight changes in the
746
00:29:15.460 --> 00:29:17.740
Earth's gravity at, uh, the kind of level you
747
00:29:17.740 --> 00:29:19.820
want to track these things, all of that means
748
00:29:19.820 --> 00:29:21.100
that you need to keep tracking them. You
749
00:29:21.100 --> 00:29:22.660
can't just find them once and say it's there
750
00:29:22.660 --> 00:29:25.060
and that's it. So there's a whole burgeoning
751
00:29:25.060 --> 00:29:26.980
kind of research industry built around
752
00:29:27.460 --> 00:29:29.660
tracking this debris, using laser range
753
00:29:29.660 --> 00:29:31.580
finding to get as accurate a position as
754
00:29:31.580 --> 00:29:34.030
possible. And part of the reason for that is
755
00:29:34.030 --> 00:29:36.590
so that things like expensive satellites and
756
00:29:36.590 --> 00:29:38.750
the space station can dodge when there's a
757
00:29:38.750 --> 00:29:40.910
chance of an impact. That's always helpful.
758
00:29:41.430 --> 00:29:43.550
Um, it is also just so that we were aware of
759
00:29:43.550 --> 00:29:44.990
what's up there, and it's a problem that's
760
00:29:44.990 --> 00:29:46.550
only going to get worse. Now, I did a little
761
00:29:46.550 --> 00:29:49.510
bit of searching around because I had never
762
00:29:49.510 --> 00:29:52.390
thought of the salvage of
763
00:29:52.390 --> 00:29:55.230
satellites and stuff like that as being a
764
00:29:55.230 --> 00:29:58.150
thing. Now, in maritime
765
00:29:58.150 --> 00:30:00.430
law, there's this concept of the right to
766
00:30:00.430 --> 00:30:02.350
salvage, which is when something is becoming
767
00:30:02.350 --> 00:30:05.170
dangerous or when it's out, which allows
768
00:30:05.170 --> 00:30:07.930
people to claim salvage rights. There is no
769
00:30:07.930 --> 00:30:09.970
such thing in space. I found a few articles
770
00:30:09.970 --> 00:30:12.250
that all confirm that. And I quote from an
771
00:30:12.250 --> 00:30:15.050
article in the spacereview.com, there is no
772
00:30:15.050 --> 00:30:17.250
right of salvage analogous to the right found
773
00:30:17.250 --> 00:30:19.570
in maritime law. Which means that even though
774
00:30:19.570 --> 00:30:21.490
a satellite or some other space object may
775
00:30:21.490 --> 00:30:24.050
not be functioning, that does not imply that
776
00:30:24.050 --> 00:30:26.250
it has been abandoned by the nation that
777
00:30:26.250 --> 00:30:29.010
launched it. And there's a pretty lengthy
778
00:30:29.010 --> 00:30:31.090
spiel following that which basically says, if
779
00:30:31.090 --> 00:30:32.930
you don't have concept for the nation that
780
00:30:32.930 --> 00:30:35.490
launched and operated that thing, you're not
781
00:30:35.490 --> 00:30:37.250
allowed to dispose of it or interfere with
782
00:30:37.250 --> 00:30:37.530
it.
783
00:30:38.730 --> 00:30:41.610
Andrew Dunkley: In fact, uh, I might just add a caveat to
784
00:30:41.610 --> 00:30:43.770
that. Uh, if you launch something into space,
785
00:30:43.770 --> 00:30:45.050
it is your responsibility.
786
00:30:45.290 --> 00:30:48.250
Jonti Horner: Yes, absolutely. Which follows on to the
787
00:30:48.250 --> 00:30:50.970
next point. That's the issue about salvaging
788
00:30:50.970 --> 00:30:53.170
it while it is still in space. And, um, I
789
00:30:53.170 --> 00:30:55.930
could imagine that with sufficiently future
790
00:30:56.090 --> 00:30:58.410
technology and a more crowded environment
791
00:30:58.490 --> 00:31:00.210
around space, there could be a commercial
792
00:31:00.210 --> 00:31:02.490
opportunity for somebody to develop Yeah, a
793
00:31:02.490 --> 00:31:05.090
cleanup crew, which companies
794
00:31:05.250 --> 00:31:08.090
who own a satellite can pay to
795
00:31:08.090 --> 00:31:09.930
recover their satellite and dispose of it
796
00:31:09.930 --> 00:31:12.730
safely or to give harvesting rights or
797
00:31:12.730 --> 00:31:14.730
whatever, where that's dealt with. I could
798
00:31:14.730 --> 00:31:16.530
see that as a commercial thing down the line.
799
00:31:16.770 --> 00:31:18.890
But it also has an impact on what happens
800
00:31:18.890 --> 00:31:21.890
when satellites fall back to Earth. Should
801
00:31:21.890 --> 00:31:23.370
they make it through the Earth's atmosphere
802
00:31:23.370 --> 00:31:25.050
intact and make it to the surface of the
803
00:31:25.050 --> 00:31:27.530
Earth, as we saw with Skylab In Australia in
804
00:31:27.530 --> 00:31:30.410
1973, for example, um, and more
805
00:31:30.410 --> 00:31:33.330
recently with fragments of SpaceX debris
806
00:31:33.330 --> 00:31:36.090
littering the planet, you might think that if
807
00:31:36.090 --> 00:31:38.450
it falls in your backyard, it's yours, but it
808
00:31:38.450 --> 00:31:41.170
isn't. The ownership remains with the people
809
00:31:41.170 --> 00:31:44.010
or the country that launched it. And so
810
00:31:44.250 --> 00:31:47.130
back when Skylab, um, landed in Western
811
00:31:47.130 --> 00:31:49.730
Australia, the area in Western Australia
812
00:31:49.730 --> 00:31:52.130
where it landed cheekily sent NASA a
813
00:31:52.130 --> 00:31:55.130
littering notice for a fine, which got paid,
814
00:31:55.510 --> 00:31:57.630
um, which was quite good fun a few years ago
815
00:31:57.630 --> 00:32:00.350
when large pieces of SpaceX rocket landed in
816
00:32:00.350 --> 00:32:01.750
the Snowy Mountains in Australia.
817
00:32:02.150 --> 00:32:02.590
Andrew Dunkley: Yes.
818
00:32:02.590 --> 00:32:04.430
Jonti Horner: People were advised not to pick the bits up
819
00:32:04.430 --> 00:32:06.350
and collect them to let the Australian Space
820
00:32:06.350 --> 00:32:09.190
Agency know, because technically,
821
00:32:09.190 --> 00:32:11.950
the space agency has a whole plan. And this
822
00:32:11.950 --> 00:32:13.910
is laid out on the space agency website under
823
00:32:13.910 --> 00:32:15.430
space.govau
824
00:32:16.150 --> 00:32:18.150
discovery of space
825
00:32:18.550 --> 00:32:21.540
debris in Australia. So
826
00:32:21.540 --> 00:32:24.180
space.govau discovery of space
827
00:32:24.180 --> 00:32:26.780
debris in Australia details
828
00:32:26.940 --> 00:32:29.620
the regulatory side of things and what the
829
00:32:29.620 --> 00:32:32.300
space agency does, and says the Australian
830
00:32:32.300 --> 00:32:33.860
government has plans in place for events
831
00:32:33.860 --> 00:32:35.420
where space debris impacts Australia.
832
00:32:36.060 --> 00:32:37.700
Description of what it is and what the role
833
00:32:37.700 --> 00:32:39.500
is, and it lays out the steps that if you
834
00:32:39.500 --> 00:32:41.540
find space debris in your backyard, you
835
00:32:41.540 --> 00:32:44.540
should follow. Step one is do not touch it.
836
00:32:44.700 --> 00:32:46.660
And I cannot stress this enough, do not touch
837
00:32:46.660 --> 00:32:48.970
it. Space objects are built from materials
838
00:32:48.970 --> 00:32:51.330
that can be hazardous. This is exacerbated by
839
00:32:51.330 --> 00:32:52.450
coming back through the atmosphere and
840
00:32:52.450 --> 00:32:55.050
getting damaged. So it says space debris
841
00:32:55.050 --> 00:32:56.530
should only be handled by appropriately
842
00:32:56.530 --> 00:32:59.370
trained and equipped professionals. That was
843
00:32:59.370 --> 00:33:01.330
particularly relevant with the fragments of
844
00:33:01.330 --> 00:33:03.330
the SpaceX rocket that fell near the Turks
845
00:33:03.330 --> 00:33:05.410
and Caicos Islands earlier this year, because
846
00:33:05.410 --> 00:33:07.450
there was a whole brouhaha about the cleanup
847
00:33:07.450 --> 00:33:10.090
and SpaceX was not following its requirements
848
00:33:10.090 --> 00:33:12.650
and not doing much, and people were upset and
849
00:33:12.650 --> 00:33:14.170
some people had been going and collecting
850
00:33:14.170 --> 00:33:15.730
bits of debris and there was a risk they'd
851
00:33:15.730 --> 00:33:18.130
fall ill and stuff like this. So, step one,
852
00:33:18.130 --> 00:33:20.970
don't touch it. Step two, contact your local
853
00:33:20.970 --> 00:33:23.530
authorities. So, um, if the situation is
854
00:33:23.530 --> 00:33:25.410
urgent, contact triple zero. So I guess
855
00:33:25.410 --> 00:33:27.450
that's if a piece of a SpaceX satellite hits
856
00:33:27.450 --> 00:33:30.250
your Tesla, don't contact the museum, call
857
00:33:30.250 --> 00:33:32.930
the police. Fair enough. Otherwise, call the
858
00:33:32.930 --> 00:33:34.930
police assistant line. So you get some advice
859
00:33:35.010 --> 00:33:37.930
and Then you notify the space agency. And
860
00:33:37.930 --> 00:33:40.610
what the space agency then has to do is
861
00:33:40.610 --> 00:33:43.550
figure out whose bit of debris it is, get in
862
00:33:43.550 --> 00:33:45.430
touch with them, um, and liaise with them
863
00:33:45.670 --> 00:33:47.550
because there is a requirement for us to
864
00:33:47.550 --> 00:33:50.070
return the material to them. It is their
865
00:33:50.070 --> 00:33:52.550
property. And um, so from
866
00:33:52.550 --> 00:33:55.110
salvaging here on Earth you don't have those
867
00:33:55.110 --> 00:33:57.350
salvage laws because even if it's a burnt up
868
00:33:57.350 --> 00:33:59.630
fragment of rocket, it's still property of
869
00:33:59.630 --> 00:34:01.630
SpaceX or it's still property of the Chinese
870
00:34:01.630 --> 00:34:04.230
government. And so we don't have that kind of
871
00:34:04.230 --> 00:34:06.230
salvage set up at the minute. There's a
872
00:34:06.230 --> 00:34:08.110
description of what happens once debris is
873
00:34:08.110 --> 00:34:10.030
identified as space debris. And it says if an
874
00:34:10.030 --> 00:34:12.230
item is confirmed as space debris, the
875
00:34:12.230 --> 00:34:14.190
Australian government has international
876
00:34:14.350 --> 00:34:16.830
obligations to notify the launching authority
877
00:34:16.990 --> 00:34:19.670
of the discovery and upon request may be
878
00:34:19.670 --> 00:34:22.430
required to return the debris. So you
879
00:34:22.430 --> 00:34:24.590
can't salvage it. Now this
880
00:34:25.470 --> 00:34:28.109
may become something where the laws evolve in
881
00:34:28.109 --> 00:34:30.700
the years to come. As I say all the time our
882
00:34:30.700 --> 00:34:32.670
uh, user space is still in this Wild west
883
00:34:32.670 --> 00:34:35.470
phase where our ability to do stuff is
884
00:34:35.470 --> 00:34:37.750
growing much more rapidly than our ability to
885
00:34:37.750 --> 00:34:39.959
legislate for it. Um, and there's a lot of
886
00:34:39.959 --> 00:34:41.799
commercial interest in not advancing the
887
00:34:41.799 --> 00:34:44.599
legislation because if you advance the
888
00:34:44.599 --> 00:34:46.239
legislation you put more costs on the
889
00:34:46.239 --> 00:34:47.959
commercial entities. So they have a vested
890
00:34:47.959 --> 00:34:50.799
interest in not having legislation about
891
00:34:50.799 --> 00:34:52.919
launches, not legislating for the number you
892
00:34:52.919 --> 00:34:54.799
can make or the environmental requirements.
893
00:34:55.359 --> 00:34:57.679
And countries are leery of doing it because
894
00:34:57.679 --> 00:34:59.559
you can launch the space from all over the
895
00:34:59.559 --> 00:35:01.919
globe. So if you say to uh, SpaceX,
896
00:35:02.479 --> 00:35:04.879
you need to meet all these punishing
897
00:35:04.879 --> 00:35:06.719
environmental conditions before you launch
898
00:35:06.719 --> 00:35:07.959
and you've got to do all this with your
899
00:35:07.959 --> 00:35:10.050
satellites, SpaceX can easily say, well
900
00:35:10.050 --> 00:35:11.650
that's fine, we'll take our investment and
901
00:35:11.650 --> 00:35:14.010
move it to another country. So there's a lot
902
00:35:14.010 --> 00:35:16.730
of challenges there. But I could imagine in
903
00:35:16.730 --> 00:35:18.690
decades to come, as commercial space becomes
904
00:35:18.690 --> 00:35:20.690
more established and our use of space becomes
905
00:35:20.690 --> 00:35:23.090
much more varied and much more numerous,
906
00:35:23.490 --> 00:35:25.610
a astronomers will complain because you get
907
00:35:25.610 --> 00:35:27.930
more and more spoiling of the night sky, but
908
00:35:27.930 --> 00:35:29.330
you'll also get the opportunity for
909
00:35:29.330 --> 00:35:30.730
businesses, just like this question
910
00:35:30.730 --> 00:35:33.290
describes, to develop why there may be the
911
00:35:33.290 --> 00:35:35.800
commercial value for people to recover
912
00:35:35.800 --> 00:35:38.440
defunct satellites in orbit, capture them,
913
00:35:38.600 --> 00:35:40.720
maybe even lift them up to a higher orbit to
914
00:35:40.720 --> 00:35:43.200
a factory that can process the materials and
915
00:35:43.200 --> 00:35:44.880
let people then build new satellites in
916
00:35:44.880 --> 00:35:47.840
orbit. That way you lower the risk of them
917
00:35:47.840 --> 00:35:49.640
burning up in Earth's atmosphere, you get rid
918
00:35:49.640 --> 00:35:51.560
of the possibility of them altering the
919
00:35:51.560 --> 00:35:53.360
atmosphere to make climate change worse or
920
00:35:53.360 --> 00:35:55.520
better, as we discussed before. And um,
921
00:35:55.520 --> 00:35:57.280
you'll lower the cost of launching new ones
922
00:35:57.280 --> 00:35:59.040
if you could reprocess and salvage and
923
00:35:59.040 --> 00:36:01.590
rebuild. Yeah, it's probably not commercially
924
00:36:01.590 --> 00:36:03.590
feasible yet, which is why nobody's doing it
925
00:36:03.590 --> 00:36:06.590
yet. But it may well become so and so. This
926
00:36:06.590 --> 00:36:08.350
is something that I'd expect to evolve in the
927
00:36:08.350 --> 00:36:11.070
next say 50 years as all this stuff becomes
928
00:36:11.070 --> 00:36:11.830
more entrenched.
929
00:36:13.270 --> 00:36:15.630
Andrew Dunkley: It's interesting uh, in regard to the
930
00:36:15.630 --> 00:36:17.710
ownership side of things. Uh, it's like when
931
00:36:17.710 --> 00:36:19.870
you put your garbage bin out with all your
932
00:36:19.870 --> 00:36:22.710
stuff in it, it's still your stuff. And even
933
00:36:22.710 --> 00:36:25.430
as far as it being dumped in
934
00:36:25.430 --> 00:36:27.650
landfill, if you've thrown out your son's
935
00:36:27.650 --> 00:36:30.490
favorite toy and he wants it back, it's still
936
00:36:30.490 --> 00:36:33.410
his toy. So it's
937
00:36:33.410 --> 00:36:36.050
the same kind of thing, um, in a down to
938
00:36:36.050 --> 00:36:38.490
earth kind of way. And to our YouTube Music
939
00:36:38.490 --> 00:36:41.290
listener, um, just one final
940
00:36:41.290 --> 00:36:41.690
point.
941
00:36:41.770 --> 00:36:42.250
Jonti Horner: Yes.
942
00:36:42.410 --> 00:36:45.410
Andrew Dunkley: There are companies researching salvage in
943
00:36:45.410 --> 00:36:45.690
space.
944
00:36:46.330 --> 00:36:46.370
Jonti Horner: Newman.
945
00:36:46.370 --> 00:36:48.850
Andrew Dunkley: Ah space. Another one called AstroDailyPod
946
00:36:48.850 --> 00:36:51.290
Scale and of course the major parties, NASA
947
00:36:51.290 --> 00:36:54.050
and ESA and several others are
948
00:36:54.050 --> 00:36:56.850
looking into this. Uh but right now it's,
949
00:36:56.850 --> 00:36:59.570
it's not a very easy thing to do. But thanks
950
00:36:59.570 --> 00:37:01.210
for the question. Thanks for the question.
951
00:37:01.290 --> 00:37:01.850
Really good.
952
00:37:04.330 --> 00:37:06.730
Okay, we checked all four systems and being
953
00:37:06.730 --> 00:37:09.690
with a go space nats, uh, we have one
954
00:37:09.770 --> 00:37:12.730
final question. This one comes from Robert
955
00:37:12.810 --> 00:37:15.370
and Robert uh, is from the Netherlands
956
00:37:15.820 --> 00:37:17.850
uh, and he's got backing music on his
957
00:37:17.850 --> 00:37:18.170
question.
958
00:37:18.540 --> 00:37:21.460
Robert: Hello, this is Robert from Netherlands. I
959
00:37:21.460 --> 00:37:24.460
have a question for you today about radio
960
00:37:24.460 --> 00:37:27.420
waves because as we all know it's a very
961
00:37:27.420 --> 00:37:30.380
efficient low energy way of communicating
962
00:37:31.260 --> 00:37:34.220
data over vast distances. And
963
00:37:34.380 --> 00:37:36.060
I would think that if we are looking for
964
00:37:36.060 --> 00:37:38.980
aliens which I find very tantalizing at
965
00:37:38.980 --> 00:37:41.780
the subject, we should be looking for radio
966
00:37:41.780 --> 00:37:44.750
waves probably like 500
967
00:37:44.750 --> 00:37:47.670
light years of a radius of the earth which
968
00:37:48.150 --> 00:37:50.990
seems to be kind of a low priority. Never
969
00:37:50.990 --> 00:37:53.270
understood why, why there's there's a
970
00:37:53.270 --> 00:37:56.230
beanbags uh, observatory that can
971
00:37:56.550 --> 00:37:58.910
know really pinpoint these but you can't
972
00:37:58.910 --> 00:38:01.430
really cast a white net so to speak. Another
973
00:38:01.430 --> 00:38:04.270
square kilometer ray might be capable of
974
00:38:04.270 --> 00:38:07.070
this being built. Australia of course. I
975
00:38:07.070 --> 00:38:09.270
was hoping you guys would have some insights.
976
00:38:09.760 --> 00:38:12.160
They're going to be interact radio waves.
977
00:38:12.480 --> 00:38:14.500
Thank you so much time.
978
00:38:14.500 --> 00:38:17.440
Andrew Dunkley: Um, thank you Robert. Lovely
979
00:38:17.440 --> 00:38:20.240
music. Yeah, very, very spacey
980
00:38:20.480 --> 00:38:23.160
indeed. Um, I would have thought that
981
00:38:23.160 --> 00:38:26.160
that's prime target number one when
982
00:38:26.160 --> 00:38:28.760
searching for life beyond Earth. Um,
983
00:38:29.360 --> 00:38:31.920
would be to be listening for radio waves
984
00:38:32.080 --> 00:38:34.680
and, and Robert's right, the Square Kilometer
985
00:38:34.680 --> 00:38:37.070
Array will be capable for that. I think it be
986
00:38:37.070 --> 00:38:39.440
able to pick up airport radar uh
987
00:38:39.950 --> 00:38:42.030
as far away as 50 light years.
988
00:38:42.670 --> 00:38:45.310
Jonti Horner: Yes, it's an incredible, incredible tool and
989
00:38:45.470 --> 00:38:47.350
in fact this is what people have been doing.
990
00:38:47.350 --> 00:38:50.030
So this is the whole foundation of a subset
991
00:38:50.030 --> 00:38:52.270
of our science called seti, the Search for
992
00:38:52.270 --> 00:38:54.910
Extraterrestrial Intelligence. Often you
993
00:38:54.910 --> 00:38:56.670
describe this as a search for a needle in a
994
00:38:56.670 --> 00:38:57.950
hair stack, where you don't know what a
995
00:38:57.950 --> 00:38:59.870
needle looks like and you've never seen a
996
00:38:59.870 --> 00:39:02.870
hair stack before. So if you're trying to
997
00:39:02.870 --> 00:39:05.720
find life that is as technologically
998
00:39:05.720 --> 00:39:08.680
advanced as us, or more. So then there
999
00:39:08.680 --> 00:39:10.480
is an argument that listening for signals
1000
00:39:10.480 --> 00:39:12.240
would be a good way to do it. And kind of
1001
00:39:12.240 --> 00:39:14.480
corroborating that is the idea that we are
1002
00:39:14.960 --> 00:39:17.480
broadcasting into the voyage, screaming like
1003
00:39:17.480 --> 00:39:20.240
a toddler in a dark cave with our
1004
00:39:20.240 --> 00:39:22.800
radio broadcasts and, um, our TV broadcasts
1005
00:39:22.800 --> 00:39:25.240
and all this stuff with radio waves. And it's
1006
00:39:25.240 --> 00:39:27.880
often argued that either the Berlin Olympics,
1007
00:39:27.880 --> 00:39:30.770
which I think were 1936, or the coronation of
1008
00:39:30.770 --> 00:39:33.002
Queen Elizabeth the Second in possibly 1952.
1009
00:39:33.178 --> 00:39:35.770
1953, yeah, were the first broadcasts that
1010
00:39:35.770 --> 00:39:37.450
were powerful enough that would be easily
1011
00:39:37.450 --> 00:39:40.370
detected from elsewhere. So if you were
1012
00:39:40.450 --> 00:39:42.490
magically able to take the Square Kilometer
1013
00:39:42.490 --> 00:39:45.210
Array and place it as a star, ah, within
1014
00:39:45.210 --> 00:39:48.130
about 80 light years of the Earth, you'd be
1015
00:39:48.130 --> 00:39:49.650
able to listen in and watch the development
1016
00:39:49.730 --> 00:39:52.090
of our technological society as our
1017
00:39:52.090 --> 00:39:54.770
broadcasts get more numerous and more varied.
1018
00:39:54.850 --> 00:39:56.850
You'd probably be able to broadcast back and
1019
00:39:57.260 --> 00:39:58.860
say, please stop broadcasting, neighbours,
1020
00:39:58.860 --> 00:40:01.300
we're sick of it. We want to know more about
1021
00:40:01.300 --> 00:40:04.060
Scott and Charlene or whatever, um, people
1022
00:40:04.060 --> 00:40:05.940
will be able to listen in. And so this gives
1023
00:40:05.940 --> 00:40:07.780
everybody the idea that just like this
1024
00:40:07.780 --> 00:40:09.980
question, we could do the same thing and we
1025
00:40:09.980 --> 00:40:12.300
could try and tune in onto the broadcasts of
1026
00:40:12.380 --> 00:40:15.380
other societies. And that's
1027
00:40:15.380 --> 00:40:18.060
fundamentally the foundation of seti. Back
1028
00:40:18.060 --> 00:40:20.700
when I was an undergraduate, back when I was
1029
00:40:20.700 --> 00:40:22.780
at high school, in the early days of personal
1030
00:40:22.780 --> 00:40:24.740
computing, there was a program called SETI at
1031
00:40:24.740 --> 00:40:27.710
home, which was a way of distributing through
1032
00:40:27.710 --> 00:40:30.670
cloud computing, packets of data obtained by
1033
00:40:30.670 --> 00:40:32.670
radio telescopes to search for signals of
1034
00:40:32.670 --> 00:40:35.190
radio broadcasts. And nothing was found.
1035
00:40:35.590 --> 00:40:38.270
There are global usage of radio telescopes
1036
00:40:38.270 --> 00:40:39.510
around the world to try and do this still.
1037
00:40:39.510 --> 00:40:41.950
The most famous of them these days is the
1038
00:40:41.950 --> 00:40:44.350
Breakthrough Listen Initiative, which was
1039
00:40:44.350 --> 00:40:46.990
funded to the tune of $100 million starting
1040
00:40:46.990 --> 00:40:49.270
back in 2015. So it's 10 years old now.
1041
00:40:49.990 --> 00:40:52.320
That did a wonderful thing for Australia
1042
00:40:52.400 --> 00:40:53.880
because the government at the time in
1043
00:40:53.880 --> 00:40:56.720
Australia was our, um, less
1044
00:40:56.720 --> 00:40:58.760
science friendly party, let's put it that
1045
00:40:58.760 --> 00:41:00.640
way. And, uh, they were looking to save money
1046
00:41:00.640 --> 00:41:03.400
by killing science, as often happens, and
1047
00:41:03.400 --> 00:41:05.640
that's having knock on effects nowadays. But
1048
00:41:05.640 --> 00:41:07.760
one of the things they wanted to do was close
1049
00:41:07.840 --> 00:41:10.800
the dish, the Parks Radio Observatory,
1050
00:41:11.200 --> 00:41:14.120
which is the Biggest, most iconic observatory
1051
00:41:14.120 --> 00:41:16.000
building I think in Australia, famous for
1052
00:41:16.410 --> 00:41:18.210
awesome movie the Dish with Sam Neill many
1053
00:41:18.210 --> 00:41:18.610
years ago.
1054
00:41:18.610 --> 00:41:20.050
Andrew Dunkley: And it's just down the road from.
1055
00:41:20.050 --> 00:41:22.090
Jonti Horner: Where I live, just down the road. And there
1056
00:41:22.090 --> 00:41:23.930
was a lot of upset that this wonderful
1057
00:41:23.930 --> 00:41:25.690
facility was going to be mothballed and
1058
00:41:25.690 --> 00:41:27.850
closed down to cut budgets,
1059
00:41:28.140 --> 00:41:30.850
um, because, you know, they wanted to put
1060
00:41:30.850 --> 00:41:32.529
more money into fossil fuel extraction to
1061
00:41:32.529 --> 00:41:35.130
satisfy their donors or whatever. I, um, have
1062
00:41:35.130 --> 00:41:38.010
views anyway, many do.
1063
00:41:38.490 --> 00:41:41.450
Parks was saved by an injection of a very
1064
00:41:41.450 --> 00:41:43.170
large sum of money from the Breakthrough
1065
00:41:43.170 --> 00:41:45.830
Listen initiative, which has kept the
1066
00:41:45.830 --> 00:41:47.630
telescope operating for another decade.
1067
00:41:47.630 --> 00:41:49.430
There's a lot of awesome new science has come
1068
00:41:49.430 --> 00:41:51.790
out of it as a result, but it is bought a
1069
00:41:51.790 --> 00:41:53.230
certain fraction of the time of that
1070
00:41:53.230 --> 00:41:55.790
telescope, which I think is about 40% to
1071
00:41:55.790 --> 00:41:57.830
specifically point that telescope around the
1072
00:41:57.830 --> 00:42:00.790
star to listen to radio broadcasts, to
1073
00:42:00.790 --> 00:42:03.550
look for radio broadcasts from nearby stars.
1074
00:42:04.190 --> 00:42:06.670
And there's been a number of papers come out
1075
00:42:06.670 --> 00:42:09.550
on this over the years that detail
1076
00:42:09.550 --> 00:42:11.350
the incredible work people have done. And to
1077
00:42:11.350 --> 00:42:12.830
illustrate the challenge of these things,
1078
00:42:12.830 --> 00:42:14.470
there's been a few occasions where people
1079
00:42:14.470 --> 00:42:16.830
think there's been a potential signal only
1080
00:42:16.830 --> 00:42:18.830
for it to be turned out to be something else.
1081
00:42:19.150 --> 00:42:21.590
One example was that they thought they'd
1082
00:42:21.590 --> 00:42:22.830
found a potential signal. And when they
1083
00:42:22.830 --> 00:42:24.470
investigated more, it happened at the same
1084
00:42:24.470 --> 00:42:26.870
time every evening and investigated more. And
1085
00:42:26.870 --> 00:42:28.390
it was that the astronomers were walking
1086
00:42:28.390 --> 00:42:29.750
across one of the building and putting their
1087
00:42:29.750 --> 00:42:32.349
food in the microwave. Yes, the building was
1088
00:42:32.349 --> 00:42:34.590
shielded. They were picking up the radiation
1089
00:42:34.590 --> 00:42:36.590
from the microwaves, you know, so it's really
1090
00:42:36.590 --> 00:42:39.230
hard to do today. We have found
1091
00:42:39.230 --> 00:42:41.550
nothing. No. And ah, there are some arguments
1092
00:42:41.550 --> 00:42:43.760
that, uh, it's very unlikely we will do.
1093
00:42:43.760 --> 00:42:45.520
That's a needle in a hair sack thing.
1094
00:42:46.320 --> 00:42:49.040
Firstly, we need to figure out where
1095
00:42:49.120 --> 00:42:51.600
in the radio spectrum to look. And um, the
1096
00:42:51.600 --> 00:42:54.200
radio wave frequency spectrum spans an
1097
00:42:54.200 --> 00:42:56.800
enormous range. A lot of efforts have been
1098
00:42:56.800 --> 00:42:59.280
focused around the hydrogen 21 centimeter
1099
00:42:59.280 --> 00:43:01.760
line viewing. That has been an obvious place
1100
00:43:01.760 --> 00:43:03.680
for people who are deliberately broadcasting
1101
00:43:03.680 --> 00:43:05.280
to broadcast, because everyone will know
1102
00:43:05.280 --> 00:43:07.840
about that. But in terms of accidental
1103
00:43:07.840 --> 00:43:09.320
broadcasts like what we're doing on the
1104
00:43:09.320 --> 00:43:11.570
Earth, there's no guarantee that another
1105
00:43:11.570 --> 00:43:13.970
species would pick the same frequencies that
1106
00:43:13.970 --> 00:43:16.690
we've chosen for the broadcast. So we might
1107
00:43:16.690 --> 00:43:18.610
be listening to the wrong tune, we might just
1108
00:43:18.610 --> 00:43:21.330
be listening at the wrong frequency. The
1109
00:43:21.330 --> 00:43:22.770
other thing though is that, uh, the kind of
1110
00:43:22.770 --> 00:43:24.090
broadcasting we've been doing for the last
1111
00:43:24.090 --> 00:43:25.610
hundred years is incredibly energy
1112
00:43:25.849 --> 00:43:28.610
inefficient because we broadcast in
1113
00:43:28.610 --> 00:43:30.970
all directions at ah, once.
1114
00:43:31.450 --> 00:43:34.050
To have a very small number of directions
1115
00:43:34.050 --> 00:43:35.930
pick up that signal, you know, all your TV
1116
00:43:35.930 --> 00:43:38.270
aerials Or whatever. It is much more
1117
00:43:38.270 --> 00:43:40.470
efficient to do point to point communications
1118
00:43:40.470 --> 00:43:43.070
or to send things through optical cables.
1119
00:43:43.390 --> 00:43:45.150
So there is some argument that as your
1120
00:43:45.150 --> 00:43:47.750
technology gets better, the amount of waste
1121
00:43:47.750 --> 00:43:49.950
noise you broadcast to space will fall off.
1122
00:43:49.950 --> 00:43:51.790
Yes. And so there's an argument that in the
1123
00:43:51.790 --> 00:43:53.630
next 30 or 40 years the Earth will become
1124
00:43:53.630 --> 00:43:56.270
radio silent again. So then there'll be this
1125
00:43:56.270 --> 00:43:57.950
little bubble around the earth getting bigger
1126
00:43:57.950 --> 00:43:59.710
and bigger where if you're in that bubble,
1127
00:43:59.950 --> 00:44:01.990
you hear our radio broadcast, but then
1128
00:44:01.990 --> 00:44:03.430
there's a smaller bubble in the middle where
1129
00:44:03.430 --> 00:44:04.510
we go silent again.
1130
00:44:04.830 --> 00:44:05.110
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah.
1131
00:44:05.110 --> 00:44:06.830
Jonti Horner: And it may be that every technological
1132
00:44:06.830 --> 00:44:08.870
species is only loud when it's in its
1133
00:44:08.870 --> 00:44:11.390
infancy, when it is that toddler screaming
1134
00:44:11.390 --> 00:44:12.710
that they don't want to leave the beach like
1135
00:44:12.710 --> 00:44:15.470
the kid I saw yesterday. And eventually
1136
00:44:15.790 --> 00:44:18.710
a uh, society learns to self regulate and
1137
00:44:18.710 --> 00:44:21.390
has more efficient ways of broadcasting. So
1138
00:44:21.390 --> 00:44:24.070
it is a fabulous question. If you want to
1139
00:44:24.070 --> 00:44:26.030
learn more about it. I do recommend looking
1140
00:44:26.030 --> 00:44:28.310
up and googling and reading around SETI as a
1141
00:44:28.310 --> 00:44:30.550
project SETI at home and the Breakthrough
1142
00:44:30.550 --> 00:44:33.480
Listen initiative. You can also look up
1143
00:44:33.720 --> 00:44:36.680
an associated thing which is mete. Mete,
1144
00:44:36.840 --> 00:44:39.840
which is, I think METE is the acronym which
1145
00:44:39.840 --> 00:44:42.560
is a search for the artifacts of advanced
1146
00:44:42.560 --> 00:44:45.520
civilizations. Oh, and I know colleague
1147
00:44:45.520 --> 00:44:47.720
of mine in the US who's part of our planet
1148
00:44:47.720 --> 00:44:50.440
search team has put out a few papers looking
1149
00:44:50.600 --> 00:44:53.480
at things that appear in science fiction like
1150
00:44:53.480 --> 00:44:56.160
Dyson spheres and ringworlds and
1151
00:44:56.160 --> 00:44:58.160
what effect they would have on the light from
1152
00:44:58.160 --> 00:45:00.420
their stars. So what the observational
1153
00:45:00.420 --> 00:45:03.260
signatures would be not with any
1154
00:45:03.260 --> 00:45:05.380
expectation that we'll ever find them, but
1155
00:45:05.380 --> 00:45:06.980
because if we don't model what they would be
1156
00:45:06.980 --> 00:45:09.100
like, if we ever see something that displays
1157
00:45:09.100 --> 00:45:10.740
that odd behavior, we wouldn't know what it
1158
00:45:10.740 --> 00:45:13.500
was. So it's again this very low
1159
00:45:13.500 --> 00:45:15.220
likelihood of finding something, but very
1160
00:45:15.220 --> 00:45:18.100
high reward if you ever do. I
1161
00:45:18.100 --> 00:45:20.100
guess that people are actually actively
1162
00:45:20.100 --> 00:45:22.780
thinking about what could we feasibly do
1163
00:45:23.100 --> 00:45:25.460
as a technological civilization in the future
1164
00:45:25.460 --> 00:45:27.990
with improving technology. How would that
1165
00:45:27.990 --> 00:45:30.550
affect our environment around the sun? How
1166
00:45:30.550 --> 00:45:32.590
would that affect the way that our planetary
1167
00:45:32.590 --> 00:45:34.950
system pairs from around other stars? And uh,
1168
00:45:35.030 --> 00:45:36.670
what would that look like if we saw a
1169
00:45:36.670 --> 00:45:39.470
different civilization doing it? So that we
1170
00:45:39.470 --> 00:45:41.230
have the predictions there so that when we
1171
00:45:41.230 --> 00:45:43.710
get vast amounts of data from these all sky
1172
00:45:43.710 --> 00:45:46.190
surveys, whether they be in the radio or
1173
00:45:46.190 --> 00:45:48.510
whether they be in the optical, we can
1174
00:45:48.510 --> 00:45:50.350
identify the oddities and figure out what
1175
00:45:50.350 --> 00:45:52.070
they are. And similarly with a square
1176
00:45:52.070 --> 00:45:54.360
kilometer array that will be pointing all
1177
00:45:54.360 --> 00:45:57.280
over the sky, doing lots of astronomy, but
1178
00:45:57.280 --> 00:45:59.760
the data from that will be analyzed by teams
1179
00:45:59.760 --> 00:46:01.920
who are interested in could there be an alien
1180
00:46:01.920 --> 00:46:04.280
signal buried in this. So you will get
1181
00:46:04.280 --> 00:46:06.640
serendipitous imaging there because wherever
1182
00:46:06.640 --> 00:46:08.960
it's looking, you get the data and you can
1183
00:46:08.960 --> 00:46:10.760
survey that to see what there is. So it is
1184
00:46:10.760 --> 00:46:13.040
something people are actively doing. You're
1185
00:46:13.040 --> 00:46:14.520
onto something good there. And I can
1186
00:46:14.520 --> 00:46:15.760
recommend, like I said, reading about
1187
00:46:15.760 --> 00:46:18.520
breakthrough lists and reading about SETI to
1188
00:46:18.520 --> 00:46:20.000
learn more about it, if that is what you're
1189
00:46:20.000 --> 00:46:20.750
interested in it.
1190
00:46:20.750 --> 00:46:23.230
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah, uh, it'd be uh, interesting to
1191
00:46:23.230 --> 00:46:26.070
discover another race somewhere
1192
00:46:26.070 --> 00:46:28.470
out there that's uh, built a megastructure,
1193
00:46:28.550 --> 00:46:31.510
um, like, oh, I don't know, a space parasol
1194
00:46:32.150 --> 00:46:35.150
array of some kind. Imagine that same
1195
00:46:35.150 --> 00:46:37.670
problem. Someone else has solved it. Yeah,
1196
00:46:37.690 --> 00:46:38.830
uh, we are going to be.
1197
00:46:38.830 --> 00:46:40.870
Jonti Horner: Doing a little, little baby test of that
1198
00:46:40.950 --> 00:46:42.870
potentially in the next 10 or 20 years if
1199
00:46:42.870 --> 00:46:45.710
NASA ever gets its funding back. There is the
1200
00:46:45.710 --> 00:46:48.390
Habitable Worlds Observatory that is
1201
00:46:48.870 --> 00:46:51.110
looking at planets around other stars. And
1202
00:46:51.110 --> 00:46:53.310
um, what they're proposing to do to allow
1203
00:46:53.310 --> 00:46:55.350
them to gather light from planets the size of
1204
00:46:55.350 --> 00:46:57.390
the Earth, uh, around stars like the sun, is
1205
00:46:57.390 --> 00:46:59.350
reflectively fly a very giant,
1206
00:46:59.830 --> 00:47:01.830
beautifully designed, very intricate,
1207
00:47:01.830 --> 00:47:04.110
fractally edged, um, space
1208
00:47:04.110 --> 00:47:06.828
parasol that would go out about 100,000
1209
00:47:06.952 --> 00:47:09.870
km from the telescope and fly in formation,
1210
00:47:09.870 --> 00:47:11.950
line up to block the light from stars so that
1211
00:47:11.950 --> 00:47:13.500
we can see the planets going around them.
1212
00:47:13.970 --> 00:47:16.010
Now that size of parasol would be way too
1213
00:47:16.010 --> 00:47:18.370
small to impact climate change, but it's a
1214
00:47:18.370 --> 00:47:20.130
really good tech demonstrator. It shows that
1215
00:47:20.130 --> 00:47:22.330
we can do that and we can get the station
1216
00:47:22.330 --> 00:47:24.810
keeping just much too small. And again, if
1217
00:47:24.810 --> 00:47:26.370
people are interested in that looking up, the
1218
00:47:26.370 --> 00:47:29.250
Habitable Worlds Observatory would be a
1219
00:47:29.250 --> 00:47:30.690
good place to look. And there's some lovely
1220
00:47:30.690 --> 00:47:32.650
videos of the animation of this thing being
1221
00:47:32.650 --> 00:47:34.730
launched and unfolding and moving out in
1222
00:47:34.730 --> 00:47:37.250
space. And they've even done tests in labs
1223
00:47:37.490 --> 00:47:40.170
for mini versions of it on long corridors to
1224
00:47:40.170 --> 00:47:41.370
prove the concept works.
1225
00:47:42.240 --> 00:47:45.080
Andrew Dunkley: All very cool, very cool indeed. And uh, a
1226
00:47:45.080 --> 00:47:46.920
cool question too, Robert. Thanks for sending
1227
00:47:46.920 --> 00:47:48.480
it in. And if you would like to send us
1228
00:47:48.480 --> 00:47:50.320
questions, don't Forget our website
1229
00:47:50.400 --> 00:47:52.160
spacenutspodcast.com
1230
00:47:52.640 --> 00:47:55.280
spacenuts IO and
1231
00:47:55.620 --> 00:47:57.920
uh, click on the AMA link and you can send us
1232
00:47:58.000 --> 00:48:00.920
text, uh, and audio questions, uh, through
1233
00:48:00.920 --> 00:48:03.240
that system. And uh, we'd be happy to get
1234
00:48:03.240 --> 00:48:04.960
them and we'll do our very best to answer
1235
00:48:04.960 --> 00:48:06.800
them. Sometimes we get the same questions,
1236
00:48:07.540 --> 00:48:10.190
um, which is not unusual if people sort of
1237
00:48:10.190 --> 00:48:12.710
hone in on a topic. Uh, so we will,
1238
00:48:12.960 --> 00:48:14.990
um, if we don't answer your question, it's
1239
00:48:14.990 --> 00:48:17.600
possibly because we've already done it, uh,
1240
00:48:17.600 --> 00:48:19.710
but we do redo questions from time to time
1241
00:48:19.710 --> 00:48:21.830
because they keep coming up, um, particularly
1242
00:48:21.830 --> 00:48:24.030
black hole questions. We quite often get a
1243
00:48:24.030 --> 00:48:26.350
repeat. Might be a couple of years later, but
1244
00:48:26.350 --> 00:48:28.070
we get a repeat of a question we've already
1245
00:48:28.310 --> 00:48:30.870
covered. So we'll, we'll sometimes redo them.
1246
00:48:31.190 --> 00:48:32.790
But, uh, good to hear from you, Robert.
1247
00:48:32.790 --> 00:48:34.910
Thanks to everyone who contributed and thanks
1248
00:48:34.910 --> 00:48:37.230
to you, Jonti, for having a crack at the
1249
00:48:37.230 --> 00:48:37.750
answers.
1250
00:48:38.560 --> 00:48:39.960
Jonti Horner: That's all good. It's what I'm here for. And
1251
00:48:39.960 --> 00:48:42.040
it's fun to face new and interesting
1252
00:48:42.040 --> 00:48:42.520
questions.
1253
00:48:42.520 --> 00:48:45.280
Andrew Dunkley: It is indeed. Uh, we'll see you on the next
1254
00:48:45.280 --> 00:48:47.640
episode. Jonti, uh, Horner, professor of
1255
00:48:47.640 --> 00:48:49.720
Astrophysics at the University of Southern
1256
00:48:49.720 --> 00:48:51.680
Queensland. And thanks to Huw in the studio.
1257
00:48:52.960 --> 00:48:55.360
Not, um, sure you're aware that Huw used to
1258
00:48:55.360 --> 00:48:57.920
work in radio. That's how we actually met. In
1259
00:48:57.920 --> 00:49:00.630
fact, he was working at a radio station, uh,
1260
00:49:00.630 --> 00:49:03.120
in Newcastle in New South Wales when I was a
1261
00:49:03.120 --> 00:49:04.840
kid and I did job experience there. And
1262
00:49:04.840 --> 00:49:06.960
that's how I met Huw originally, when I was
1263
00:49:06.960 --> 00:49:09.130
about 13 years old or something.
1264
00:49:09.450 --> 00:49:12.330
Anyway, he's an old radio man these days
1265
00:49:12.330 --> 00:49:15.130
and, uh, when it comes to radio waves,
1266
00:49:15.450 --> 00:49:17.650
he feels that that means he should stand out
1267
00:49:17.650 --> 00:49:20.010
the front waving at traffic. That's why he's
1268
00:49:20.010 --> 00:49:22.570
not with us today. And he may never come
1269
00:49:22.570 --> 00:49:24.690
back. And from me, Andrew Dunkley, thanks for
1270
00:49:24.690 --> 00:49:27.130
your company. I'll see you on the next
1271
00:49:27.130 --> 00:49:29.130
episode of Space Nuts. Bye. Bye.
1272
00:49:30.330 --> 00:49:32.530
Jonti Horner: You'll be listening to the Space Nuts.
1273
00:49:32.530 --> 00:49:33.130
Robert: Podcast.
1274
00:49:34.900 --> 00:49:37.540
Jonti Horner: Available at Apple Podcasts, Spotify,
1275
00:49:37.700 --> 00:49:40.460
iHeartRadio or your favorite podcast
1276
00:49:40.460 --> 00:49:42.780
player. You can also stream on demand at
1277
00:49:42.780 --> 00:49:43.860
bytes. Com.
1278
00:49:44.180 --> 00:49:46.260
Andrew Dunkley: This has been another quality podcast
1279
00:49:46.260 --> 00:49:47.940
production from Bytes.
1280
00:49:47.940 --> 00:49:48.070
Jonti Horner: Com.
1281
00:49:48.070 --> 00:49:48.230
Speaker C: Um.