Feb. 26, 2026

"Jupiter's not quite as big as we thought."

"Jupiter's not quite as big as we thought."

Tiny Jupiter, Unusual Comet Behavior, and Gravitational Lensing In this exciting episode of Space Nuts, hosts Andrew Dunkley and Professor Fred Watson delve into some intriguing astronomical discoveries. They discuss the surprising news about...

Spotify podcast player badge
Apple Podcasts podcast player badge
Youtube Music podcast player badge
iHeartRadio podcast player badge
Spreaker podcast player badge
PocketCasts podcast player badge
YouTube podcast player badge
Goodpods podcast player badge
Amazon Music podcast player badge
TuneIn podcast player badge
Overcast podcast player badge
JioSaavn podcast player badge
Castro podcast player badge
RSS Feed podcast player badge
Spotify podcast player iconApple Podcasts podcast player iconYoutube Music podcast player iconiHeartRadio podcast player iconSpreaker podcast player iconPocketCasts podcast player iconYouTube podcast player iconGoodpods podcast player iconAmazon Music podcast player iconTuneIn podcast player iconOvercast podcast player iconJioSaavn podcast player iconCastro podcast player iconRSS Feed podcast player icon
Tiny Jupiter, Unusual Comet Behavior, and Gravitational Lensing
In this exciting episode of Space Nuts, hosts Andrew Dunkley and Professor Fred Watson delve into some intriguing astronomical discoveries. They discuss the surprising news about Jupiter's size, the strange rotation of Comet 41P, and the fascinating concept of utilizing solar gravitational lensing for deep space exploration.
Episode Highlights:
Jupiter's Revised Size: The duo explores new measurements from NASA's Juno mission that indicate Jupiter is slightly smaller than previously thought. They discuss the implications of these findings on our understanding of the gas giant's internal structure and atmospheric dynamics.
The Mystery of Comet 41P: Andrew and Fred reveal the unusual behavior of Comet 41P, which has experienced a significant slowdown in its rotation, potentially reversing its spin direction. They analyze the possible causes of this phenomenon and what it could mean for the comet's future.
Solar Gravitational Lensing: The hosts dive into the concept of using the Sun's gravitational field as a lens to observe distant exoplanets. They discuss the challenges of reaching the solar gravitational lens focal point and the technologies that might one day make such missions feasible.

For more Space Nuts, including our continuously updating newsfeed and to listen to all our episodes, visit our website. Follow us on social media at SpaceNutsPod on Facebook, Instagram, and more. We love engaging with our community, so be sure to drop us a message or comment on your favorite platform.
If you’d like to help support Space Nuts and join our growing family of insiders for commercial-free episodes and more, visit spacenutspodcast.com/about.
Stay curious, keep looking up, and join us next time for more stellar insights and cosmic wonders. Until then, clear skies and happy stargazing.

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/space-nuts-astronomy-insights-cosmic-discoveries--2631155/support.

 

 

WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.080 --> 00:00:02.640
Hello there, thanks for joining us yet again. This is

2
00:00:02.680 --> 00:00:05.719
Space Nuts. My name is Andrew Dunkley. We're here to

3
00:00:05.759 --> 00:00:09.880
talk astronomy and space science. And on today's program, we're

4
00:00:09.919 --> 00:00:12.800
going to look at a tiny weeni itsy bitsy Jupiter. Yes,

5
00:00:13.439 --> 00:00:16.199
it's not nearly as big as they thought it was.

6
00:00:16.600 --> 00:00:20.559
In fact, it could lose status as a consequence of this.

7
00:00:20.679 --> 00:00:23.000
Maybe not, but we'll talk about that. We're also going

8
00:00:23.039 --> 00:00:28.280
to look at a flipping interesting comet and solar gravitational

9
00:00:28.399 --> 00:00:31.679
lens focal points. Could we visit them and what will

10
00:00:31.719 --> 00:00:35.679
that mean? We'll find out on this episode of Space Nuts.

11
00:00:36.000 --> 00:00:43.359
Fifteen second in channel ten nine ignition sequence Space Nuts

12
00:00:44.280 --> 00:00:50.520
or three two.

13
00:00:48.479 --> 00:00:50.679
Space Nuts, as can I report it.

14
00:00:50.759 --> 00:00:54.399
Bills good and joining us again to talk about all

15
00:00:54.399 --> 00:00:57.000
of that stuff and probably a lot more as Professor

16
00:00:57.039 --> 00:00:59.439
Fred Watson, Astronomer at Large, Hello Fred.

17
00:00:59.600 --> 00:01:02.640
Hello Andrew, good to see you again, to see you.

18
00:01:02.640 --> 00:01:08.840
Always love the hoopy shirt. Oh yeah, sorry, it's very

19
00:01:08.879 --> 00:01:10.719
tutty old on this shirt.

20
00:01:11.200 --> 00:01:14.200
This one's nasty, tatty, but it's white and it's got

21
00:01:14.239 --> 00:01:16.280
more food on it than I've ever put in his stomach.

22
00:01:16.359 --> 00:01:18.280
So has he got the has he got the space not?

23
00:01:18.359 --> 00:01:19.000
His logo on it.

24
00:01:19.359 --> 00:01:23.920
Hang on, I've got one here somewhere, a spacent logo

25
00:01:25.159 --> 00:01:27.120
to know I have, but it's not on not on

26
00:01:27.159 --> 00:01:31.040
this shirt. It's on the other wide shirt. Where did

27
00:01:31.040 --> 00:01:34.359
that logo go? I've lost my logo.

28
00:01:35.000 --> 00:01:38.400
Anyway, we'll fight losing losing mojo.

29
00:01:38.920 --> 00:01:43.359
That's true too. Yes, indeed, let's begin because we've got

30
00:01:43.480 --> 00:01:47.640
a lot to talk about. This first story looks at Jupiter,

31
00:01:47.719 --> 00:01:50.760
the biggest planet in our solar system until we find

32
00:01:50.799 --> 00:01:55.920
planet nine. And this is a story that's suggesting that

33
00:01:56.280 --> 00:01:59.280
Jupiter is not quite as big as we thought it was.

34
00:02:00.400 --> 00:02:06.879
Yeah, it's it's shrunk by well eight kilometers at the

35
00:02:06.920 --> 00:02:10.280
equator and twenty four kilometers at the poles. So what

36
00:02:10.400 --> 00:02:12.960
this is all about? And I should just give you

37
00:02:13.800 --> 00:02:19.120
the numbers. So the revised radius of Jupiter at its

38
00:02:19.120 --> 00:02:23.719
equator is seventy four hundred and eighty eight kilometers, which

39
00:02:23.759 --> 00:02:30.039
is actually I think four kilometers less than we thought before,

40
00:02:31.000 --> 00:02:34.319
which doubles up to up to eight kilometers when you're

41
00:02:34.360 --> 00:02:40.840
talking about diameter. But it's polar radius, which is sixty

42
00:02:40.879 --> 00:02:43.520
six thousand, eight hundred and forty two, And those two

43
00:02:43.599 --> 00:02:46.960
numbers are quite different, which is why Jupiter's flattened at

44
00:02:47.000 --> 00:02:51.159
its poles, just as Saturn is. But that's actually twenty

45
00:02:51.199 --> 00:02:57.120
four kilometers less than the previous estimations. So for the diameter,

46
00:02:57.479 --> 00:03:02.080
so it's not a huge, huge amount, but it's.

47
00:03:02.039 --> 00:03:04.639
Not when you're talking about the size of the planet.

48
00:03:04.719 --> 00:03:07.439
That's exactly that's what I mean. Yeah, seventy one thousand

49
00:03:07.439 --> 00:03:10.039
and four. So it's what one one hundred and forty

50
00:03:10.479 --> 00:03:17.039
thousand kilometers or thereabouts in diameter, which is eleven Earth diameters,

51
00:03:17.080 --> 00:03:21.800
which is what we always say. So why, well, first

52
00:03:21.840 --> 00:03:24.719
of all, how have these measurements been made? And the

53
00:03:24.759 --> 00:03:27.039
answer is that the old measurements actually go back a

54
00:03:27.080 --> 00:03:31.479
long way. They come from the voyager and pioneer era

55
00:03:31.800 --> 00:03:35.520
of the exploration of the outer planets, and that goes

56
00:03:35.599 --> 00:03:41.639
back to the seventies and eighties. They So what led

57
00:03:41.680 --> 00:03:44.159
to the diameter or the size of Jupiter that we've

58
00:03:44.439 --> 00:03:49.159
been using since then is what's called a radio occultation.

59
00:03:49.360 --> 00:03:54.360
So the spacecraft is behind As it passes behind Jupiter,

60
00:03:55.159 --> 00:03:59.960
its signals get refracted actually by the atmosphere of the planet,

61
00:04:00.159 --> 00:04:03.199
probably scattered as well, but you can time it very

62
00:04:03.199 --> 00:04:07.759
accurately in time when the spacecraft disappears behind the planet,

63
00:04:07.800 --> 00:04:11.240
and you know it's trajectory. You can then time when

64
00:04:11.240 --> 00:04:14.439
it reappears, and from that you can calculate the and

65
00:04:14.560 --> 00:04:17.319
knowing about Jupiter's motion and the spacecraft's motion, you can

66
00:04:17.360 --> 00:04:20.040
calculate what the diameter is. So that those are the

67
00:04:20.079 --> 00:04:22.360
values that we've been using ever since.

68
00:04:23.639 --> 00:04:25.560
I think I know where all of this went wrong.

69
00:04:25.879 --> 00:04:28.279
They didn't a layer for it, stopping for gas.

70
00:04:29.639 --> 00:04:34.120
The planet or the spacecraft. Well, it's a gas giant,

71
00:04:34.160 --> 00:04:36.399
that's right, Yeah, the planet's a gas giant. So yes,

72
00:04:36.959 --> 00:04:41.240
it's a good point. Anyway, I let that one pass.

73
00:04:41.519 --> 00:04:44.879
So moving off wasn't very good.

74
00:04:44.319 --> 00:04:46.360
It was all right for the start of the show.

75
00:04:46.399 --> 00:04:50.959
They usually get better, as we call it's the new

76
00:04:50.959 --> 00:04:54.160
measurements come, of course from the spacecraft that is currently

77
00:04:54.199 --> 00:04:58.800
in orbit and working away very hard at Jupiter in

78
00:04:58.879 --> 00:05:01.480
orbit around the planet, and that is JUNO, that says

79
00:05:01.560 --> 00:05:06.199
JUNO Mission, which has been orbiting Jupiter since twenty sixteen

80
00:05:07.000 --> 00:05:09.600
and doing pretty well. It's yes, for the decades since

81
00:05:09.600 --> 00:05:13.439
we've had Juno, which gosh it, time flies, doesn't it anyway,

82
00:05:14.120 --> 00:05:18.519
So that's allowed much more accurate measurements because the space

83
00:05:18.600 --> 00:05:22.079
that JUNO spacecraft. Its orbit is very well understood. It's

84
00:05:22.160 --> 00:05:27.160
fairly close to Jupiter. But you might think, you know, well,

85
00:05:27.199 --> 00:05:31.639
why are we so keen to know the damage of

86
00:05:31.680 --> 00:05:35.800
the planet to such a high degree of accuracy, And

87
00:05:35.920 --> 00:05:42.879
the answer is to do with our model because it is. Yeah,

88
00:05:42.959 --> 00:05:45.879
that's right, it's to do with our modeling of the

89
00:05:45.920 --> 00:05:50.519
planet's interior because a small difference like that can make

90
00:05:50.560 --> 00:05:55.680
a big difference to what we imagine the interior of

91
00:05:55.720 --> 00:05:58.319
the planet is like. And remember, of course, everybody that

92
00:05:58.439 --> 00:06:00.879
Jupiter all wes see is it's cloud belts. When we

93
00:06:00.920 --> 00:06:04.199
look at the planet, we don't see any surface or

94
00:06:04.680 --> 00:06:07.040
any hint of a surface. So the internal structure of

95
00:06:07.120 --> 00:06:10.639
Jupiter is something we have to deduce from other measurements,

96
00:06:11.279 --> 00:06:14.600
and the an accurate measurement of the diameter of the

97
00:06:14.639 --> 00:06:18.879
planet comes into that. So that's the reason it Also,

98
00:06:19.920 --> 00:06:21.720
you know, one of the other things that's of interest

99
00:06:21.879 --> 00:06:25.360
in Jupiter is the behavior of the atmosphere itself and

100
00:06:25.399 --> 00:06:28.920
the winds that blow in Jupiter's atmosphere, and that also

101
00:06:29.519 --> 00:06:33.920
needs an accurate understanding of the diameter of the planet.

102
00:06:34.519 --> 00:06:37.680
Yeah, I actually I was just looking at that diagram

103
00:06:38.079 --> 00:06:44.240
that shows the different potential diameter situations based on the

104
00:06:44.279 --> 00:06:47.519
behavior of the planet. And yeah, without wind it loses

105
00:06:47.560 --> 00:06:51.879
another what fourteen kilometers.

106
00:06:50.879 --> 00:06:54.920
Yes, that's right, it does. If you if you imagine

107
00:06:54.959 --> 00:06:58.240
the winds aren't there, it does. It shrinks, so by

108
00:06:58.279 --> 00:07:01.759
fourteen kilometers exactly. That's the radius the not the diameter.

109
00:07:02.959 --> 00:07:10.399
So we we have, you know, a tiny figure that

110
00:07:10.839 --> 00:07:14.040
looks minuscule compared with the diameters of the planet itself,

111
00:07:14.079 --> 00:07:17.920
but it is important in understanding the upper atmosphere. It's

112
00:07:18.480 --> 00:07:21.680
if there were no winds, then what we will be

113
00:07:21.680 --> 00:07:24.279
seeing will be fourteen kilometers smaller.

114
00:07:25.000 --> 00:07:27.920
I'm surprised that it's taken us a decade to figure

115
00:07:27.959 --> 00:07:30.759
it out, and Juno as they have been there nearly

116
00:07:30.800 --> 00:07:31.639
ten years.

117
00:07:31.959 --> 00:07:37.680
Yeah, but maybe you know, the accuracy that we're getting

118
00:07:37.920 --> 00:07:43.879
with this relies on many passages of Juno around Jupiter.

119
00:07:45.360 --> 00:07:48.720
There were and because you're always you know that the

120
00:07:48.759 --> 00:07:53.240
cord that of the Jupiter's disc that the planet that

121
00:07:53.279 --> 00:07:56.920
the spacecraft flies behind is different every time, and so

122
00:07:57.399 --> 00:08:03.079
we you probably need to build up a statistically significant

123
00:08:03.160 --> 00:08:07.360
sample of entry and egress times when you're looking at

124
00:08:07.560 --> 00:08:11.079
you know, the object disappearing by behind the planet. Occultation

125
00:08:11.279 --> 00:08:15.040
is what we call it an occultation, is when one

126
00:08:15.079 --> 00:08:18.639
object hides another, and that's how you're measuring these diameters.

127
00:08:18.720 --> 00:08:22.800
So yeah, it's probably it's probably taken ten years, partly

128
00:08:22.800 --> 00:08:24.800
to a mass the data to give us this kind

129
00:08:24.800 --> 00:08:25.839
of level of accuracy.

130
00:08:26.319 --> 00:08:29.399
So, okay, how accurate do you think it is now

131
00:08:29.439 --> 00:08:34.080
compared to those early flybys with Voyager and Pioneer.

132
00:08:35.399 --> 00:08:38.440
That's a really good question. Actually, I haven't seen any

133
00:08:39.320 --> 00:08:44.039
error estimates on and as you know in physics and

134
00:08:44.240 --> 00:08:47.279
certainly in astronomy too, you always need a plus or

135
00:08:47.399 --> 00:08:51.200
minus an error estimate as to you know what the

136
00:08:51.320 --> 00:08:56.480
likelihood of your measurement being that number is, and I'm

137
00:08:56.600 --> 00:08:59.120
seen it for these so I don't know the answer

138
00:08:59.120 --> 00:09:01.320
to that. But my guess is that we're talking about

139
00:09:01.639 --> 00:09:05.600
in the region of a kilometer, which is pretty impressive

140
00:09:05.639 --> 00:09:09.879
for something that diameter, and something that's that far away

141
00:09:09.960 --> 00:09:12.519
have a billion kilometers away, So.

142
00:09:12.679 --> 00:09:16.240
Does this mean that air estimations of other planets in

143
00:09:16.279 --> 00:09:18.840
the Solar System are probably a bit off as well?

144
00:09:19.159 --> 00:09:22.840
When you consider that Neptune, for example, I think we've

145
00:09:22.840 --> 00:09:25.080
only visited once, would that be right?

146
00:09:25.200 --> 00:09:30.159
Yeah, Yeah, that's right. So yes, I think you're right,

147
00:09:30.440 --> 00:09:35.679
You know you certainly the estimates of the planets beyond

148
00:09:36.000 --> 00:09:39.720
Jupiter and Saturn in terms of their diameter and physical

149
00:09:39.879 --> 00:09:43.559
characteristics will have much bigger error limits on them, just

150
00:09:43.600 --> 00:09:46.120
because we can't make the measurements as accurate as you

151
00:09:46.159 --> 00:09:49.399
can when you've got a spacecraft in orbits around.

152
00:09:49.120 --> 00:09:53.840
One of them. Okay, so that's that's work in progress.

153
00:09:54.080 --> 00:09:56.759
Whenever we go back, we might be able to fix that.

154
00:09:57.000 --> 00:10:01.039
But yeah, they've got any missions plan and for Nepturing

155
00:10:01.120 --> 00:10:02.240
and Urinus or anything.

156
00:10:02.720 --> 00:10:07.000
There's always calls for them because they're such interesting worlds. Yeah,

157
00:10:07.120 --> 00:10:09.279
but I don't think I mean, I think there are

158
00:10:10.600 --> 00:10:12.720
there are lots of proposals, but I don't think there's

159
00:10:12.720 --> 00:10:15.720
anything FUNDED might be wrong about that. Maybe our listeners

160
00:10:15.720 --> 00:10:17.080
can tell me if I'm wrong about.

161
00:10:16.919 --> 00:10:20.000
They may well, because a lot of it. Actually, We've

162
00:10:20.039 --> 00:10:24.159
got one fellow on Facebook who regularly researches some of

163
00:10:24.200 --> 00:10:26.639
the things we talk about, and he publishes his findings

164
00:10:26.639 --> 00:10:31.879
on the Facebook podcast group. Yeah, and I think it's great.

165
00:10:31.879 --> 00:10:35.000
I've read a few of his explanations and they're very good.

166
00:10:35.480 --> 00:10:38.039
So we're probably going to get sacked, but.

167
00:10:38.240 --> 00:10:42.200
It's surprise them sectors or.

168
00:10:44.200 --> 00:10:46.879
Well they can afford us. That's why we're still here.

169
00:10:47.559 --> 00:10:49.840
Well, that's true. Yes, that's true, very true.

170
00:10:50.320 --> 00:10:53.120
No, it's a really good discussion point. So it sort

171
00:10:53.120 --> 00:10:56.000
of keeps the momentum going when we discuss these things.

172
00:10:56.039 --> 00:10:58.919
So I'm sure it'll work on our tiny Jupiter story,

173
00:11:00.080 --> 00:11:03.320
which good, yes, which you can read about at the

174
00:11:03.559 --> 00:11:06.000
Daily Galaxy dot com website, or you can read the

175
00:11:06.039 --> 00:11:10.519
paper at Nature Astronomy. This is space Nuts with Andrew

176
00:11:10.559 --> 00:11:12.600
Dunkley and Professor Fred Watson.

177
00:11:17.720 --> 00:11:20.879
That's a that's agreement, is that if the goodness say,

178
00:11:20.960 --> 00:11:28.639
I'm really sorry, Okay, he gets very enthusiastic.

179
00:11:31.639 --> 00:11:32.879
Space nuts.

180
00:11:33.759 --> 00:11:35.600
I couldn't help it. Turn that into a link.

181
00:11:36.240 --> 00:11:37.879
It's it's yeah, brilliant.

182
00:11:37.919 --> 00:11:41.360
I'll tell him, gosh, it's just too good. It's just

183
00:11:41.399 --> 00:11:43.840
too good. He was going off his nut that day, wasn't.

184
00:11:43.679 --> 00:11:48.320
He He was? Yes, he's very highly strung.

185
00:11:49.279 --> 00:11:51.279
Well, that that's how he That's how he greeted us

186
00:11:51.360 --> 00:11:54.440
when we visited you late last year. He came tearing down.

187
00:11:54.320 --> 00:11:58.879
The stairs doing his rooster impersonation. No one could ever

188
00:11:58.960 --> 00:12:03.639
rob your Fred. The one good thing about it, yes,

189
00:12:03.960 --> 00:12:04.759
is the one good thing.

190
00:12:04.759 --> 00:12:07.360
They don't have to be big aggressive dogs they just

191
00:12:07.399 --> 00:12:08.559
have to be loud.

192
00:12:09.600 --> 00:12:11.559
Or even you know, a brush turkey going past the

193
00:12:11.559 --> 00:12:13.919
window in the middle of the night. That's enough as well.

194
00:12:15.320 --> 00:12:19.200
Yes, that's it's all that takes sometimes. Now let's move

195
00:12:19.200 --> 00:12:22.600
on to our next story. And this is a story

196
00:12:22.639 --> 00:12:27.639
that's got scientists really well. The headline says, scientists stunned.

197
00:12:27.679 --> 00:12:32.279
We're talking about a comet that has done something really,

198
00:12:32.559 --> 00:12:36.600
really unusual. Unusual. We're talking about comet forty one P.

199
00:12:37.639 --> 00:12:40.960
What's it done this time? Because it keeps making the

200
00:12:40.960 --> 00:12:42.639
news this one, Yes.

201
00:12:42.480 --> 00:12:48.840
It does. Tuttle. Jacobini cressak is its full name, better

202
00:12:48.879 --> 00:12:52.919
known as forty one P. It's an object probably a

203
00:12:53.000 --> 00:12:57.600
kilometer across a flying iceberg like basically like comets are,

204
00:12:58.840 --> 00:13:01.320
and it orbits the I think about every five and

205
00:13:01.360 --> 00:13:03.720
a half years, so it's in what we would call

206
00:13:03.720 --> 00:13:09.360
a short period comet orbit, and it's when it passes

207
00:13:09.399 --> 00:13:11.279
near the Sun. Of course, it does what comets do.

208
00:13:11.399 --> 00:13:19.399
It out gases, produces basically plumes of gas leaving its surface.

209
00:13:20.159 --> 00:13:25.360
It's usually water ice being converted directly to water vapor

210
00:13:25.759 --> 00:13:30.399
by the process known as sublimation. But what has been

211
00:13:30.840 --> 00:13:37.759
recorded in in fact, in quite a while ago actually,

212
00:13:37.759 --> 00:13:39.879
I think this is eight years ago by a NASA

213
00:13:39.919 --> 00:13:45.919
spacecraft observations made by NASA Swift spacecraft measuring its rotation

214
00:13:46.840 --> 00:13:52.200
and basically over sixty days, what's that sort of nine

215
00:13:52.320 --> 00:13:57.960
weeks or something like that, it slowed down from rotating

216
00:13:58.279 --> 00:14:02.720
once every twenty hours to once every fifty three hours.

217
00:14:03.360 --> 00:14:05.399
So that is a you know, it's almost a three

218
00:14:05.639 --> 00:14:10.679
factor of three in the level of spin that this

219
00:14:10.799 --> 00:14:18.000
commet has got. Ye, and it's there's suggestion that maybe

220
00:14:18.120 --> 00:14:23.600
it's now rotating in the other direction from what it

221
00:14:23.919 --> 00:14:26.600
was before that there has been some sort of reverse.

222
00:14:26.759 --> 00:14:30.200
It hasn't slided down to about one third, it's it's reversed.

223
00:14:30.360 --> 00:14:33.639
So it's it's slowed down well five times.

224
00:14:34.919 --> 00:14:37.879
Yeah, if the other way it could be, I mean,

225
00:14:38.000 --> 00:14:41.000
part of it could be due to how you measure

226
00:14:41.039 --> 00:14:43.679
the rotation, because it could be tumbling as well, so

227
00:14:43.720 --> 00:14:45.399
you might be seeing it going the other way around.

228
00:14:45.440 --> 00:14:47.639
But it does seem to be I think you're right.

229
00:14:47.679 --> 00:14:49.559
It's I think what you've just said is correct that

230
00:14:49.600 --> 00:14:53.039
it's a it's a reversal and genuine reversal of its

231
00:14:53.200 --> 00:14:57.879
rotation direction. So yes, it's it's got much more than

232
00:14:57.919 --> 00:14:59.159
a factor of three. That's right.

233
00:14:59.360 --> 00:15:02.399
That kill my theory because my first thought was, well,

234
00:15:02.399 --> 00:15:06.639
this must just be an observational era. But an observational

235
00:15:06.639 --> 00:15:09.600
era wouldn't get it the wrong way around. Less, of

236
00:15:09.639 --> 00:15:11.720
course you're talking about the color of the universe, but

237
00:15:11.919 --> 00:15:20.840
we won't get there. But it was so, yeah, what

238
00:15:20.960 --> 00:15:23.559
else could be causing this change behind?

239
00:15:23.600 --> 00:15:27.080
Well, I think if it was anything other than a comet,

240
00:15:27.919 --> 00:15:30.480
you know, if it was an asteroid doing this, or

241
00:15:30.519 --> 00:15:35.039
a planetismal, or a distant one of the distant Couiper

242
00:15:35.080 --> 00:15:37.879
Belt objects or something like that. If it was any

243
00:15:37.879 --> 00:15:42.559
of those, we would be utterly gobsmacked because there's no

244
00:15:42.799 --> 00:15:45.879
physical mechanism to do that other than an interaction with

245
00:15:45.960 --> 00:15:49.919
another body. You know, if you had two bodies gravitating

246
00:15:50.200 --> 00:15:53.360
close together, it could have an effect on the rotation,

247
00:15:54.159 --> 00:15:57.000
but in fact, more especially a collision that would do

248
00:15:57.080 --> 00:16:00.279
it as well. But with a comet, you've got this

249
00:16:00.360 --> 00:16:03.759
process that outgases what I was saying earlier, as it

250
00:16:03.799 --> 00:16:08.799
gets near the sun there they're basically the ices start

251
00:16:08.840 --> 00:16:12.720
to vaporize and you get a thrust from the from

252
00:16:12.759 --> 00:16:17.080
the outgasing material, which is what we call a non

253
00:16:17.080 --> 00:16:22.559
gravitational perturbation. It's when when you know, the outgasing material

254
00:16:22.600 --> 00:16:26.799
is acting like a rocket engine and it's changing the

255
00:16:26.879 --> 00:16:31.200
dynamics of the object as it's orbiting the Sun. And

256
00:16:31.279 --> 00:16:35.759
you can imagine that if there was a formation of

257
00:16:35.799 --> 00:16:39.519
ice on the on the surface of the comet that

258
00:16:39.720 --> 00:16:45.360
essentially tilted the blast of the of the escaping material

259
00:16:45.919 --> 00:16:50.240
as as it's sublimated as the as the the material

260
00:16:50.279 --> 00:16:53.840
that water mostly went straight from a solid to a gas.

261
00:16:54.440 --> 00:16:58.000
It's like having a you know, a sort of Vernia thruster.

262
00:16:58.120 --> 00:17:01.240
It's like where you've got a thrust that is changing

263
00:17:01.240 --> 00:17:05.119
the rotation of a spacecraft because it's not going the

264
00:17:05.160 --> 00:17:07.960
line of the of the thrust is not going through

265
00:17:08.000 --> 00:17:10.680
the center of gravity of the comet. If it's off

266
00:17:10.720 --> 00:17:12.599
the center of gravity, then it's going to impart a

267
00:17:12.720 --> 00:17:15.240
rotation on it, and if it's strong enough, then it

268
00:17:15.319 --> 00:17:17.440
might be enough to slow it down and perhaps even

269
00:17:17.519 --> 00:17:21.640
reverse its reverse its rotation. So that's what the thinking is.

270
00:17:21.680 --> 00:17:23.039
But it's never been seen before.

271
00:17:23.400 --> 00:17:25.839
No, like retro rockets.

272
00:17:26.839 --> 00:17:30.400
Yeah, that's right, it's a retro rocket, but one that's

273
00:17:30.519 --> 00:17:33.559
not slowing it down in its orbit. It's changing its

274
00:17:33.640 --> 00:17:36.680
rotation because if the angle that the rocket, if you

275
00:17:36.960 --> 00:17:39.799
want to call it that the rocket exhaust is coming out.

276
00:17:40.720 --> 00:17:43.359
At the moment, it's seven hundred and seventy four million

277
00:17:43.440 --> 00:17:49.960
kilometers from Earth by point one out astronomical units, And

278
00:17:50.039 --> 00:17:54.440
as you mentioned, this unusual behavior was checked back in

279
00:17:54.519 --> 00:17:59.079
twenty seventeen and they've only just sort of put a

280
00:17:59.079 --> 00:18:02.200
paper together to try and explain it. It's got a

281
00:18:02.240 --> 00:18:05.160
five point four year orbit, so it comes back quite often.

282
00:18:05.759 --> 00:18:10.519
Yeah, that's right. It's it's it's captured, basically captured by Jupiter,

283
00:18:11.119 --> 00:18:14.279
so its orbit is dictated. It would have been in

284
00:18:14.319 --> 00:18:16.440
its early history, it would have been a comet coming

285
00:18:16.880 --> 00:18:19.240
into the Inner Solar System from the Oort Cloud, this

286
00:18:19.559 --> 00:18:23.400
spherical sort of reservoir of comets, but would have had

287
00:18:23.440 --> 00:18:27.200
its orbit modified maybe several times by the influence of Jupiter,

288
00:18:27.240 --> 00:18:31.319
which is why it's now in this really short, such

289
00:18:31.319 --> 00:18:36.000
short period orbit five point four years. There has been

290
00:18:36.000 --> 00:18:39.400
a suggestion that if you've got these sort of oblique

291
00:18:39.440 --> 00:18:41.880
out gassing that we've just been talking about that would

292
00:18:42.079 --> 00:18:45.880
change the rotation of the object, that that might also

293
00:18:46.079 --> 00:18:49.599
signal that there might be weaknesses in the comet structure,

294
00:18:49.759 --> 00:18:52.640
and it may even be a precursor to it breaking up,

295
00:18:52.839 --> 00:18:56.039
which is something that I think will be observed with

296
00:18:56.079 --> 00:19:00.759
great interest as to how it progresses since since this

297
00:19:00.920 --> 00:19:01.559
change of spin.

298
00:19:01.839 --> 00:19:04.119
Yeah maybe, and we will find We could find out

299
00:19:04.160 --> 00:19:08.160
as late as or as soon as late twenty twenty eight,

300
00:19:08.240 --> 00:19:12.359
I think, is its next appearance near the Sun or

301
00:19:12.400 --> 00:19:13.000
near us.

302
00:19:12.960 --> 00:19:13.720
Or whatever you like.

303
00:19:13.799 --> 00:19:18.880
So I'll keep an eye on forty one P. I

304
00:19:18.880 --> 00:19:19.559
guess you P.

305
00:19:19.720 --> 00:19:24.759
That's right. There was a proposal long and long ago

306
00:19:25.720 --> 00:19:28.519
to send a spacecraft to it because it's a short

307
00:19:28.559 --> 00:19:31.359
period comet, so it's always in the inner Solar System,

308
00:19:31.640 --> 00:19:34.559
and that was what was then called EZRA, the European

309
00:19:34.599 --> 00:19:39.559
Space Research Organization, the precursor of ISSA, the European Space Agency.

310
00:19:40.319 --> 00:19:42.599
This is in the nineteen sixties. They looked at sending

311
00:19:42.640 --> 00:19:45.440
a probe to that comet, but they changed their mind

312
00:19:45.480 --> 00:19:46.119
so it never went.

313
00:19:47.319 --> 00:19:51.680
Ah, yes, I'm sure that happens a lot in astronomy.

314
00:19:51.759 --> 00:19:54.839
I mean not an easy, not an easy thing to

315
00:19:56.240 --> 00:20:00.359
do to you know, set up a mission and actually

316
00:20:00.400 --> 00:20:02.240
execute it, and you're going to come up with the dollars

317
00:20:02.279 --> 00:20:06.160
and yeah, you know, it's only so many ten cent

318
00:20:06.240 --> 00:20:11.680
pieces confider on a jar on the mantelpiece. So yeah,

319
00:20:11.680 --> 00:20:16.119
that's right, Yeah, all right. You can read all about

320
00:20:16.880 --> 00:20:21.799
comment forty one p at it's at the Daily Galaxy

321
00:20:21.839 --> 00:20:24.160
dot com website. But you can also read the paper.

322
00:20:24.359 --> 00:20:27.759
I think it's just been pre published or pre there's

323
00:20:28.200 --> 00:20:33.000
a pre print available on the archive. This is Space

324
00:20:33.119 --> 00:20:40.039
Nuts Andrew Dunkley here with Professor Fred what's a bolt?

325
00:20:42.519 --> 00:20:45.039
If I'm promund.

326
00:20:50.799 --> 00:20:55.160
Piece Nuts, I've read to our final story on this episode.

327
00:20:55.519 --> 00:20:59.519
We've talked many times about gravitational lensing and some of

328
00:20:59.519 --> 00:21:02.200
the strain things that it does. You can watch something

329
00:21:02.240 --> 00:21:05.640
happen two, three, four times over the course of many

330
00:21:05.720 --> 00:21:10.000
years because of gravitational lensing, because the light is redirected

331
00:21:10.160 --> 00:21:12.480
and takes longer to get here, and so you can

332
00:21:12.519 --> 00:21:15.319
see something and go, oh, what was that? Hang on,

333
00:21:15.359 --> 00:21:19.200
I'll know again in a couple of years because not quite.

334
00:21:19.240 --> 00:21:24.240
But what we're talking about, what we're talking about in

335
00:21:24.240 --> 00:21:29.519
this particular case though, is actually going out to a

336
00:21:29.599 --> 00:21:33.119
solar gravitational lens focal point. Is that the crux of

337
00:21:33.119 --> 00:21:34.119
the story.

338
00:21:34.000 --> 00:21:37.119
It is, That's right. So this is a really interesting

339
00:21:37.599 --> 00:21:41.960
kind of assay really on the Universe Today website by

340
00:21:42.079 --> 00:21:47.039
Thomas Wick about about the solar gravitational lens and about

341
00:21:47.039 --> 00:21:50.920
how you'd get there. But the solar gravitational lens itself

342
00:21:51.000 --> 00:21:54.799
is really interesting. So the idea is exactly as you've said.

343
00:21:55.599 --> 00:21:58.759
If you've got an object of any mass, and it

344
00:21:58.799 --> 00:22:03.359
happens with planets as well stars, it's going to bend

345
00:22:03.359 --> 00:22:08.359
the light passing around it because it's distorting space under

346
00:22:08.400 --> 00:22:13.759
the protocols introduced by not sorry, as we understand it,

347
00:22:13.960 --> 00:22:18.240
by the protocols introduced by Einstein's general theory of relativity.

348
00:22:18.480 --> 00:22:21.160
That's what lets us do all the calculations about this

349
00:22:21.200 --> 00:22:23.079
sort of thing. So you've got an object in space,

350
00:22:23.480 --> 00:22:25.720
it's bending the light around it, which means it acts

351
00:22:25.799 --> 00:22:28.480
kind of like a lens. It's a very odd sort

352
00:22:28.519 --> 00:22:33.119
of lens, though. I've seen a glass kind of interpretation

353
00:22:33.319 --> 00:22:38.839
of a gravitational lens. There's a specialist who works on

354
00:22:38.880 --> 00:22:42.079
this stuff in Melbourne who showed me her glass version

355
00:22:42.079 --> 00:22:46.119
of a gravitational lens, and it resembles, you know, the

356
00:22:46.440 --> 00:22:49.240
bottom of a wineglass where the stalk comes up out

357
00:22:49.279 --> 00:22:49.960
of the middle of that.

358
00:22:50.240 --> 00:22:51.599
I know them very well for it.

359
00:22:52.440 --> 00:22:56.599
Yeah, Well, if you break the wine glass off and

360
00:22:56.640 --> 00:22:59.160
you're left with that sort of flared part at the bottom,

361
00:22:59.240 --> 00:23:02.240
that's more less the same as a gravitational lens in

362
00:23:02.279 --> 00:23:04.599
the way it would act on the light going around it.

363
00:23:04.640 --> 00:23:07.519
So it's not like a magnifying loss, which is what

364
00:23:07.559 --> 00:23:10.759
you'd like it to be. It's this very peculiar cusp

365
00:23:10.839 --> 00:23:16.240
shaped lens, and so it gives you a focus that

366
00:23:16.440 --> 00:23:20.440
is blurred, but it's because you know the properties of

367
00:23:20.519 --> 00:23:23.480
the object that's doing the lensing, and in this case

368
00:23:23.519 --> 00:23:27.000
we're talking about the Sun. Because you know the properties

369
00:23:27.039 --> 00:23:30.519
of the Sun, you can calculate what that blurring does

370
00:23:30.559 --> 00:23:34.160
to the image and you can essentially compensate it. So

371
00:23:34.240 --> 00:23:38.720
you could recreate the light coming from a very distant

372
00:23:38.759 --> 00:23:43.440
object and recreate the image that the Sun is forming

373
00:23:43.519 --> 00:23:45.880
as though it was a proper lens rather than a

374
00:23:45.920 --> 00:23:50.400
peculiar cusp lens. And that's what's sort of being proposed.

375
00:23:50.480 --> 00:23:55.759
Could we send a spacecraft to the solar gravitational lens

376
00:23:55.920 --> 00:24:02.359
focus where you could look directly back at a planet

377
00:24:02.880 --> 00:24:06.920
on the other side of the Sun around a distant star,

378
00:24:07.359 --> 00:24:10.559
so you're looking into another Solar system a long way away,

379
00:24:10.920 --> 00:24:13.640
but you're using the Sun's gravity to bend that light

380
00:24:14.319 --> 00:24:18.720
by relativity and focus it to a point. And if

381
00:24:18.720 --> 00:24:21.519
you put a spacecraft there with a camera and a

382
00:24:21.519 --> 00:24:25.480
fancy computer, you might be able to reveal continents on

383
00:24:25.559 --> 00:24:30.599
an exoplanet, for example, or even cities. That's the sort

384
00:24:30.599 --> 00:24:33.440
of thing that people are thinking of. So here's the

385
00:24:33.480 --> 00:24:36.160
snag though. That's a great idea, but a snag.

386
00:24:36.599 --> 00:24:40.319
I think I just read that exact paragraph as you're

387
00:24:40.359 --> 00:24:42.559
about to say it. I might blow the whistle.

388
00:24:43.400 --> 00:24:47.559
Yeah, well you can now you do it. It's the distance,

389
00:24:47.640 --> 00:24:52.279
isn't it. It's yeah, about somewhere between six hundred and

390
00:24:52.319 --> 00:24:55.400
fifty and nine hundred astronomical units is what's quoted in

391
00:24:55.400 --> 00:24:58.400
this in this article. In an astronomical unit is one

392
00:24:58.519 --> 00:25:01.599
hundred and fifty million, killer me. So it is a

393
00:25:01.680 --> 00:25:04.880
number with a lot of zeros after it in kilometers,

394
00:25:06.039 --> 00:25:10.319
and you know it's getting your spacecraft that is the

395
00:25:10.440 --> 00:25:14.160
issue we're talking about. Well, the estimate here is four

396
00:25:14.200 --> 00:25:17.039
times further than Voyager one has traveled, and that, as

397
00:25:17.279 --> 00:25:22.000
we know, is twenty three light hours away. They reckon

398
00:25:22.359 --> 00:25:25.599
that it would be more than another one hundred and

399
00:25:25.680 --> 00:25:30.319
thirty years to for Voyager one to get to the

400
00:25:31.240 --> 00:25:33.680
Sun's gravitational lens point.

401
00:25:33.640 --> 00:25:37.440
By my calculation, and this is probably way wrong. Ninety

402
00:25:37.519 --> 00:25:41.720
seven five hundred million kilometers.

403
00:25:41.319 --> 00:25:43.200
Sounds about right. Yeah, it sounds like a lot.

404
00:25:43.359 --> 00:25:46.000
Yep. I didn't think my calculator could fit that many

405
00:25:46.079 --> 00:25:50.680
numbers on it. Remember the old calculators when they first

406
00:25:50.720 --> 00:25:52.400
came out. If you gave it too big a problem

407
00:25:52.440 --> 00:25:55.839
and it would just give you a little EVA era.

408
00:25:56.079 --> 00:25:57.319
Now I can't do that. Sorry.

409
00:25:57.559 --> 00:26:01.079
Yeah, yeah, this computer says no. Really, that's right.

410
00:26:01.920 --> 00:26:05.759
Yeah, that's a long way away and very difficult to achieve.

411
00:26:05.839 --> 00:26:08.759
But I think one day maybe we could do yes.

412
00:26:08.880 --> 00:26:11.400
So that that's really the thrust of this article. How

413
00:26:11.440 --> 00:26:13.759
about you know what's the way to do it? Can you?

414
00:26:14.799 --> 00:26:19.319
Can you get to that point? And they the author's

415
00:26:19.599 --> 00:26:22.960
got some nice calculations which have checked these are correct,

416
00:26:23.359 --> 00:26:27.759
I should check them. But anyway, if you were trying

417
00:26:27.759 --> 00:26:31.480
to get to that solar gravitational lens point focal point

418
00:26:31.839 --> 00:26:35.319
in twenty years, then you need your spacecraft to travel

419
00:26:35.480 --> 00:26:41.319
at about one hundred and fifty kilometers per second. It's

420
00:26:41.440 --> 00:26:45.240
which is very hard when you're pointing away from the sum.

421
00:26:45.599 --> 00:26:48.400
The Parker solar probe, they point out, and we kind

422
00:26:48.400 --> 00:26:50.720
of know this because we've talked about it, has actually

423
00:26:50.720 --> 00:26:54.039
got to nearly two hundred kilometers per second but that's

424
00:26:54.079 --> 00:26:56.519
only when it's a what we call perihelium. It's at

425
00:26:56.559 --> 00:27:00.279
its closest point to the Sun where it's going fast.

426
00:27:01.279 --> 00:27:03.359
And what we're talking about here is something going in

427
00:27:03.359 --> 00:27:06.200
the opposite direction, going away from the Sun. For it

428
00:27:06.240 --> 00:27:08.759
to travel at that sort of speed, you need an

429
00:27:08.759 --> 00:27:13.119
extraordinary amount of thrust. I don't think you're talking about

430
00:27:13.200 --> 00:27:15.160
chemical rockets to get up tow one hundred and fifty

431
00:27:15.240 --> 00:27:20.240
kilometers per second. Lights, So the light sales, Yeah, that's

432
00:27:20.559 --> 00:27:23.000
one of the things that you and I've spoken about before.

433
00:27:23.039 --> 00:27:27.319
If you can beam out laser lights to a solar

434
00:27:27.400 --> 00:27:32.119
sale or gigantic piece of you know, something very thin

435
00:27:32.240 --> 00:27:35.839
like MYLA that's reflective, then the light itself pushes it

436
00:27:35.880 --> 00:27:37.960
along and you just keep going so that it just

437
00:27:38.079 --> 00:27:40.119
keeps up, building up speed.

438
00:27:41.400 --> 00:27:45.039
There are trouble is when you get there, how do

439
00:27:45.039 --> 00:27:45.559
you stop it?

440
00:27:46.079 --> 00:27:46.680
Yeah, you don't.

441
00:27:46.759 --> 00:27:50.079
You just keep going, That's right, unless it had something

442
00:27:50.119 --> 00:27:52.799
on board to like you turn off the light and

443
00:27:54.680 --> 00:27:56.160
reverse something.

444
00:27:56.440 --> 00:27:58.559
I don't know, you're never going to slow it down

445
00:27:58.640 --> 00:28:02.680
because even if you turn the light, it stops it accelerating,

446
00:28:02.720 --> 00:28:06.359
but it's still going at that speed. That's right. There's

447
00:28:06.400 --> 00:28:14.359
a a possibility that, you know, could you do the

448
00:28:14.400 --> 00:28:23.279
solar sale trick and basically make it successful. The problem

449
00:28:23.279 --> 00:28:27.519
with solar sales is you can only carry objects that

450
00:28:27.559 --> 00:28:30.200
are very light in weight or have low mass. And

451
00:28:30.279 --> 00:28:34.200
you might remember we've looked at this with what was it,

452
00:28:34.279 --> 00:28:38.480
the Breakthrough star Shot program, which I think has now ceased.

453
00:28:38.799 --> 00:28:41.640
Breakthrough star Shop looked at the feasibility of using a

454
00:28:41.640 --> 00:28:45.559
solar sale to send a spacecraft to proximate Centauri, which

455
00:28:45.559 --> 00:28:50.559
is only four light years away, and it could be done,

456
00:28:50.680 --> 00:28:57.039
but your spacecraft would basically consist of one what's it

457
00:28:57.079 --> 00:29:00.880
called printed circuit board and a detector. There's not really

458
00:29:00.960 --> 00:29:03.279
room for anything else. It will be so it'd have

459
00:29:03.359 --> 00:29:05.359
to be so light in weight it will be measured

460
00:29:05.440 --> 00:29:10.000
in grams rather than kilograms or tons. So that will

461
00:29:10.079 --> 00:29:12.559
be the problem with your you know, with sending a

462
00:29:12.599 --> 00:29:16.960
spacecraft to the solar gravitational lens using a solar sale.

463
00:29:17.039 --> 00:29:20.839
So you're talking then about nuclear sources and things of

464
00:29:20.880 --> 00:29:25.079
that sort. That this very nice article goes into some

465
00:29:25.119 --> 00:29:29.720
of the niceties of nuclear thermal propulsion and things of

466
00:29:29.759 --> 00:29:33.799
that sort. Even so, it's still a very tough ask

467
00:29:34.440 --> 00:29:39.839
to send a spacecraft to that interesting part of the

468
00:29:39.880 --> 00:29:46.519
Sun's environment where you've got the solar gravity forming a

469
00:29:46.559 --> 00:29:51.000
focus to get there. It's really to get there in

470
00:29:51.119 --> 00:29:54.160
you know, twenty years or so. You're talking about really

471
00:29:54.200 --> 00:29:56.519
new technologies that we simply don't have at the moment.

472
00:29:56.960 --> 00:29:59.480
Yeah, well one day it might be a long way off,

473
00:29:59.480 --> 00:30:03.039
but the time may come, and then again we might

474
00:30:03.039 --> 00:30:09.880
have figured everything out by then, so yeah.

475
00:30:07.839 --> 00:30:10.319
Yeah, I mean, you know, the other thing is you'd

476
00:30:10.319 --> 00:30:13.240
want to choose. So you've got to choose the direction

477
00:30:13.319 --> 00:30:16.240
that you go in to be in the opposite direction

478
00:30:16.279 --> 00:30:19.920
to the planet that you want to observe, the exoplanet.

479
00:30:20.079 --> 00:30:22.680
And if you get that wrong, if you choose a

480
00:30:22.720 --> 00:30:26.119
planet that's completely boring and has no surface features whatsoever,

481
00:30:27.400 --> 00:30:31.960
then you don't really contribute much to our knowledge, particularly

482
00:30:32.000 --> 00:30:34.039
our knowledge of whether we're alone or not, whether it's

483
00:30:34.079 --> 00:30:34.839
life and dowhere else.

484
00:30:34.920 --> 00:30:37.039
It's sort of like leaving the lens cap on the

485
00:30:37.079 --> 00:30:41.599
camera when you land on birdness. Yes, actually they didn't

486
00:30:41.640 --> 00:30:43.000
leave it on. It melted on. I think.

487
00:30:44.079 --> 00:30:46.880
Yeah, well one of them fell off as well, didn't

488
00:30:46.880 --> 00:30:49.200
it fall off some top of the on top of

489
00:30:49.240 --> 00:30:52.480
the scale that was going to give the you know,

490
00:30:52.519 --> 00:30:55.960
as a ruler that they jettison to give the camera

491
00:30:56.079 --> 00:30:58.240
something to look at so you could measure the size

492
00:30:58.240 --> 00:31:00.160
of things, and the lens cap landed right and top

493
00:31:00.200 --> 00:31:01.279
of it. I think that's what happens.

494
00:31:01.640 --> 00:31:05.599
They've had quite a few venus disasters over the years.

495
00:31:05.599 --> 00:31:09.200
But yeah, you're right, this would be very, very difficult

496
00:31:09.200 --> 00:31:12.079
to swallow if you buging it up, because you couldn't

497
00:31:12.119 --> 00:31:13.359
go and fix it, not.

498
00:31:13.319 --> 00:31:16.200
Like honey, that's right. You can't move it in any direction.

499
00:31:16.480 --> 00:31:18.480
You're stuck on one plate. Really.

500
00:31:18.599 --> 00:31:23.359
Indeed, it's food for thought though, but one day we'll

501
00:31:23.400 --> 00:31:25.799
figure out a way. If you'd like to read about

502
00:31:25.799 --> 00:31:28.960
that story, it is at Universe today dot com, as

503
00:31:29.039 --> 00:31:31.799
Fred said, and we're done, Fred, thank you very much.

504
00:31:32.480 --> 00:31:35.880
Oh yeah, that was great to talk about all those things.

505
00:31:35.920 --> 00:31:37.640
So I hope you do it again sometimes.

506
00:31:37.319 --> 00:31:39.960
One topic, so I'm sure we will. If you would

507
00:31:40.039 --> 00:31:43.880
like to visit us in the meantime, don't forget to

508
00:31:44.160 --> 00:31:47.039
visit our website, space nuts podcast dot com or space

509
00:31:47.119 --> 00:31:50.279
nuts dot io, or visit our social media platforms the

510
00:31:50.279 --> 00:31:54.799
official space nuts Facebook page or Instagram page or YouTube

511
00:31:54.920 --> 00:31:57.440
channel or whatever you like. Or if you want to

512
00:31:57.480 --> 00:32:01.160
talk to like minded space nuts, you can do that

513
00:32:01.279 --> 00:32:04.279
on the Space Nuts podcast group on Facebook, which is

514
00:32:04.319 --> 00:32:06.480
always a lot of fun. Thanks Red, We'll see you soon.

515
00:32:07.880 --> 00:32:10.319
Yes, I hope so Bill he said that.

516
00:32:10.319 --> 00:32:13.480
And thanks to HEU in the studio who couldn't be

517
00:32:13.519 --> 00:32:16.599
with us today. He was invited by a friend to

518
00:32:16.640 --> 00:32:19.559
see a comet. He couldn't wait, so he ran over there.

519
00:32:19.599 --> 00:32:22.759
It turned out to be Goldfish. Some people will get

520
00:32:22.759 --> 00:32:26.759
that and from me Andrew Dunkley, thanks for your company.

521
00:32:27.160 --> 00:32:29.119
See you on the next episode of Space Nuts. Bye

522
00:32:29.160 --> 00:32:30.559
Bye snus.

523
00:32:30.839 --> 00:32:35.920
You'll be listening to the Space Nuts podcast available at

524
00:32:35.920 --> 00:32:41.200
Apple Podcasts, Spotify, iHeartRadio, or your favorite podcast player.

525
00:32:41.400 --> 00:32:44.519
You can also stream on demand at guides dot com.

526
00:32:44.720 --> 00:32:50.319
This has been another quality podcast production from nights dot com.