Jan. 30, 2026
Challenger's Legacy, Cosmic Moons & the Mystery of Rapid Black Hole Growth
Challenger Remembrance, Australian of the Year, and the Mystery of Massive Moons In this poignant episode of Space Nuts, hosts Andrew Dunkley and Professor Fred Watson reflect on the 40th anniversary of the Challenger space shuttle disaster, sharing...
Challenger Remembrance, Australian of the Year, and the Mystery of Massive Moons
In this poignant episode of Space Nuts, hosts Andrew Dunkley and Professor Fred Watson reflect on the 40th anniversary of the Challenger space shuttle disaster, sharing their memories and insights about this tragic event. They also celebrate the announcement of the Australian of the Year and delve into intriguing discussions about the definition of moons and the rapid growth of black holes.
Episode Highlights:
- Challenger Space Shuttle Disaster: Andrew and Fred discuss the Challenger disaster of 1986, revisiting the events leading to the tragic explosion and the lessons learned from this pivotal moment in space history. They reflect on the human cost and the impact it had on the space program.
- Australian of the Year: The hosts celebrate the recognition of Catherine Bennell Pegg, an Australian astronaut and Director of Space Technology at the Australian Space Agency, as the Australian of the Year. They discuss her contributions to space science and her role in inspiring future generations.
- Defining a Moon: Andrew and Fred explore a recent study that challenges our understanding of what constitutes a moon. They discuss the discovery of a massive potential moon orbiting a gas giant and the implications for our definitions in astronomy.
- The Rapid Growth of Black Holes: The episode concludes with a fascinating examination of how black holes can grow rapidly in chaotic conditions, as discussed in recent research. The hosts analyze the findings and what they mean for our understanding of the universe.
For more Space Nuts, including our continuously updating newsfeed and to listen to all our episodes, visit our website. Follow us on social media at SpaceNutsPod on Facebook, Instagram, and more. We love engaging with our community, so be sure to drop us a message or comment on your favorite platform.
If you’d like to help support Space Nuts and join our growing family of insiders for commercial-free episodes and more, visit spacenutspodcast.com/about.
Stay curious, keep looking up, and join us next time for more stellar insights and cosmic wonders. Until then, clear skies and happy stargazing.
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/space-nuts-astronomy-insights-cosmic-discoveries--2631155/support.
In this poignant episode of Space Nuts, hosts Andrew Dunkley and Professor Fred Watson reflect on the 40th anniversary of the Challenger space shuttle disaster, sharing their memories and insights about this tragic event. They also celebrate the announcement of the Australian of the Year and delve into intriguing discussions about the definition of moons and the rapid growth of black holes.
Episode Highlights:
- Challenger Space Shuttle Disaster: Andrew and Fred discuss the Challenger disaster of 1986, revisiting the events leading to the tragic explosion and the lessons learned from this pivotal moment in space history. They reflect on the human cost and the impact it had on the space program.
- Australian of the Year: The hosts celebrate the recognition of Catherine Bennell Pegg, an Australian astronaut and Director of Space Technology at the Australian Space Agency, as the Australian of the Year. They discuss her contributions to space science and her role in inspiring future generations.
- Defining a Moon: Andrew and Fred explore a recent study that challenges our understanding of what constitutes a moon. They discuss the discovery of a massive potential moon orbiting a gas giant and the implications for our definitions in astronomy.
- The Rapid Growth of Black Holes: The episode concludes with a fascinating examination of how black holes can grow rapidly in chaotic conditions, as discussed in recent research. The hosts analyze the findings and what they mean for our understanding of the universe.
For more Space Nuts, including our continuously updating newsfeed and to listen to all our episodes, visit our website. Follow us on social media at SpaceNutsPod on Facebook, Instagram, and more. We love engaging with our community, so be sure to drop us a message or comment on your favorite platform.
If you’d like to help support Space Nuts and join our growing family of insiders for commercial-free episodes and more, visit spacenutspodcast.com/about.
Stay curious, keep looking up, and join us next time for more stellar insights and cosmic wonders. Until then, clear skies and happy stargazing.
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/space-nuts-astronomy-insights-cosmic-discoveries--2631155/support.
WEBVTT
0
00:00:00.320 --> 00:00:00.640
Professor Fred Watson: Hi there.
1
00:00:00.640 --> 00:00:03.000
Andrew Dunkley: Thanks for joining us on Space Nuts, where we
2
00:00:03.000 --> 00:00:05.880
talk astronomy and space science, uh, twice
3
00:00:05.880 --> 00:00:08.360
a week in fact, and I'm glad you could join
4
00:00:08.360 --> 00:00:10.920
us yet again. Uh, today's
5
00:00:10.920 --> 00:00:13.820
episode has some great, uh,
6
00:00:14.160 --> 00:00:16.960
news, but also, uh, a bit of a sad
7
00:00:16.960 --> 00:00:19.720
reflection. It's 40 years since
8
00:00:19.720 --> 00:00:22.520
the Challenger space shuttle disaster.
9
00:00:22.520 --> 00:00:24.840
Can you believe that? 40 years. Of course,
10
00:00:24.840 --> 00:00:27.670
some of you listening to us won't
11
00:00:27.670 --> 00:00:30.350
remember it because you're 40. Uh, but, uh,
12
00:00:30.350 --> 00:00:32.120
for those of us who are a few years older,
13
00:00:32.120 --> 00:00:34.750
uh, it is, um, a very, very strong
14
00:00:34.830 --> 00:00:37.790
memory. We'll, uh, talk about that. On a
15
00:00:37.790 --> 00:00:40.430
happier note, we will reveal the Australian
16
00:00:40.430 --> 00:00:42.389
of the Year. I think most Australians will
17
00:00:42.389 --> 00:00:45.070
know who that is. Uh, how do you
18
00:00:45.070 --> 00:00:47.710
define a moon? That question has come up
19
00:00:47.710 --> 00:00:50.590
because of a potential discovery and
20
00:00:50.750 --> 00:00:53.030
they think they know why black holes are
21
00:00:53.030 --> 00:00:56.010
getting bigger fast. We'll
22
00:00:56.010 --> 00:00:58.530
talk about all of that on this episode of
23
00:00:58.530 --> 00:00:59.410
Space Nuts.
24
00:00:59.570 --> 00:01:02.050
Generic: 15 seconds. Guidance is internal.
25
00:01:02.290 --> 00:01:04.930
10, 9. Ignition
26
00:01:05.010 --> 00:01:05.970
sequence start.
27
00:01:06.130 --> 00:01:07.130
Professor Fred Watson: Space Nuts.
28
00:01:07.130 --> 00:01:09.816
Generic: 5, 4, 3. 2. 1. 2, 3, 4,
29
00:01:09.884 --> 00:01:12.370
5, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1. Space
30
00:01:12.530 --> 00:01:15.010
Nuts astronauts report it feels good.
31
00:01:16.130 --> 00:01:18.250
Andrew Dunkley: Joining us as always, is his good self,
32
00:01:18.250 --> 00:01:20.330
Professor Fred Watson, astronomer at large.
33
00:01:20.330 --> 00:01:21.010
Hello, Fred.
34
00:01:21.630 --> 00:01:23.070
Professor Fred Watson: Hello. It's good to be good.
35
00:01:23.470 --> 00:01:25.550
Andrew Dunkley: It is good to be good. It's good to see you.
36
00:01:26.990 --> 00:01:29.190
It's good to be in a cool room because it's
37
00:01:29.190 --> 00:01:31.230
not cool in our part of the world at the
38
00:01:31.230 --> 00:01:33.390
moment. We're right in the middle of a week
39
00:01:33.390 --> 00:01:35.870
long, uh, run of 40 plus
40
00:01:36.270 --> 00:01:38.330
Celsius temperatures. Uh,
41
00:01:38.990 --> 00:01:41.230
we've, uh, broken our uh, record
42
00:01:41.870 --> 00:01:44.590
in Dubbo for the hottest day in January
43
00:01:44.670 --> 00:01:45.590
and that was
44
00:01:45.590 --> 00:01:48.400
46.21 I think
45
00:01:48.400 --> 00:01:51.160
we had, uh, on Monday on Australia
46
00:01:51.320 --> 00:01:54.320
Day, which, um, yeah, it was dreadful.
47
00:01:54.320 --> 00:01:57.280
I mean it was just horrific. Um, so,
48
00:01:57.280 --> 00:01:58.920
yeah, it's, it's been a pretty rough week.
49
00:01:59.070 --> 00:02:01.440
Um, my plants are suffering. There's nothing
50
00:02:01.440 --> 00:02:04.280
I can do about it. And I, uh, think we're
51
00:02:04.280 --> 00:02:06.600
going to lose a few. So unfortunately, that's
52
00:02:06.600 --> 00:02:09.600
the way it goes. Um, I suppose that's what
53
00:02:09.600 --> 00:02:11.200
happens when they plant plants in an
54
00:02:11.200 --> 00:02:13.920
environment like this that um, don't come
55
00:02:13.920 --> 00:02:16.880
from here. They struggle. But,
56
00:02:16.900 --> 00:02:18.880
uh, yes, all, all is well with you?
57
00:02:19.820 --> 00:02:22.600
Professor Fred Watson: Uh, yeah, our plants, uh, pretty well are all
58
00:02:22.600 --> 00:02:25.600
natives, uh, in Marnie's garden. So they,
59
00:02:25.600 --> 00:02:27.160
they don't seem to mind.
60
00:02:27.160 --> 00:02:29.920
But we've got much more modest temperatures
61
00:02:29.920 --> 00:02:31.440
than you have here on the coast.
62
00:02:31.680 --> 00:02:33.320
Andrew Dunkley: Probably about 10 degrees cooler.
63
00:02:33.320 --> 00:02:36.240
Professor Fred Watson: I imagine it's not quite that, but
64
00:02:36.240 --> 00:02:39.040
not far off. Yeah, yeah, actually, no, it's
65
00:02:39.040 --> 00:02:41.800
more like 20 at the moment. 20
66
00:02:41.800 --> 00:02:44.000
degrees? Yeah, we're down at, um. But it's
67
00:02:44.000 --> 00:02:45.680
forecast to be 29 today, so.
68
00:02:45.910 --> 00:02:48.790
Andrew Dunkley: Yes, well, we're going to get to 41 I think
69
00:02:48.870 --> 00:02:51.870
today, so I think we're already pushing
70
00:02:51.870 --> 00:02:54.070
towards 30 as I speak. And it's only what,
71
00:02:54.230 --> 00:02:56.550
9:30 in the morning local time. So,
72
00:02:57.780 --> 00:02:59.710
um, we've got a lot to talk about, so we
73
00:02:59.710 --> 00:03:00.790
better get stuck into it.
74
00:03:00.800 --> 00:03:03.590
Uh, the first thing is, uh, something
75
00:03:03.590 --> 00:03:06.510
that, um, I don't think anyone who
76
00:03:06.510 --> 00:03:09.110
was around at the time will ever forget.
77
00:03:09.750 --> 00:03:12.460
I'm talking about the Challenger space
78
00:03:12.460 --> 00:03:14.660
shuttle launch, uh, in
79
00:03:14.660 --> 00:03:17.420
1986. And this is
80
00:03:17.420 --> 00:03:18.860
basically what happened.
81
00:03:19.740 --> 00:03:21.580
Generic: T minus 15 seconds.
82
00:03:24.700 --> 00:03:26.934
T minus 10, 9,
83
00:03:27.089 --> 00:03:30.060
8, 7, 6. We
84
00:03:30.060 --> 00:03:32.610
have main engine start. 4,
85
00:03:32.750 --> 00:03:34.780
3, 2, 1.
86
00:03:35.580 --> 00:03:36.780
And liftoff.
87
00:03:37.340 --> 00:03:37.830
Andrew Dunkley: Liftoff.
88
00:03:37.830 --> 00:03:40.820
Generic: Uh, of the 25th space shuttle mission and it
89
00:03:40.820 --> 00:03:42.060
has cleared the tower.
90
00:03:46.910 --> 00:03:47.470
Challenger
91
00:03:50.510 --> 00:03:52.190
good roll program confirmed.
92
00:03:53.310 --> 00:03:55.070
Challenger now heading downrange.
93
00:04:03.470 --> 00:04:06.030
Engines beginning throttling down now at
94
00:04:06.030 --> 00:04:08.590
94%. Normal throttles
95
00:04:08.750 --> 00:04:10.510
for most of the flight. 104%.
96
00:04:13.410 --> 00:04:16.210
Throttle down to 65% shortly.
97
00:04:19.890 --> 00:04:22.570
Engines at 65%. Three engines running
98
00:04:22.570 --> 00:04:24.650
normally. Three good fuel cells. Three good
99
00:04:24.650 --> 00:04:25.170
APUs.
100
00:04:28.050 --> 00:04:30.610
Velocity 2257ft per second.
101
00:04:30.610 --> 00:04:32.930
Altitude 4.3 nautical miles downrange.
102
00:04:32.930 --> 00:04:33.810
Distance 3 nautical
103
00:04:33.810 --> 00:04:36.310
miles.
104
00:04:39.580 --> 00:04:41.260
Engines throttling up. Three engines now at
105
00:04:41.260 --> 00:04:43.980
104%. Challenger go at throttle up.
106
00:04:50.540 --> 00:04:53.380
1 minute 15 seconds. Velocity 2900ft per
107
00:04:53.380 --> 00:04:55.420
second. Altitude 9 nautical miles downrange.
108
00:04:55.420 --> 00:04:56.780
Distance 7 nautical miles.
109
00:05:03.160 --> 00:05:03.400
Professor Fred Watson: It.
110
00:05:18.150 --> 00:05:18.970
M.
111
00:05:26.920 --> 00:05:28.360
Generic: Flight controllers here looking very
112
00:05:28.360 --> 00:05:29.480
carefully at the situation.
113
00:05:31.350 --> 00:05:32.950
Obviously a major malfunction.
114
00:05:38.550 --> 00:05:39.830
We have no downlink.
115
00:05:49.190 --> 00:05:51.190
We have a report from the flight dynamics
116
00:05:51.190 --> 00:05:53.710
officer that the vehicle has exploded. Flight
117
00:05:53.710 --> 00:05:55.910
director confirms that we are looking at,
118
00:05:56.810 --> 00:05:58.810
uh, checking with the recovery forces to see,
119
00:05:58.810 --> 00:06:00.190
uh, what can be done at this point.
120
00:06:01.310 --> 00:06:03.630
Andrew Dunkley: And there it is. That was the launch of
121
00:06:03.630 --> 00:06:06.590
challenger in 1986, uh,
122
00:06:06.590 --> 00:06:08.910
in real time. Uh, and
123
00:06:09.390 --> 00:06:12.030
we heard the final words of, uh, the
124
00:06:12.030 --> 00:06:14.830
commander, Dick Scobie, when he said, roger,
125
00:06:15.230 --> 00:06:18.110
going with throttle up. And that was
126
00:06:18.110 --> 00:06:20.110
basically where it all went horribly wrong.
127
00:06:20.510 --> 00:06:22.780
Fred. Uh, the, um,
128
00:06:24.110 --> 00:06:26.430
cause of the accident was ultimately
129
00:06:26.590 --> 00:06:29.430
blamed on the O rings. The O rings
130
00:06:29.430 --> 00:06:32.230
joined each section of the solid
131
00:06:32.230 --> 00:06:34.430
rocket boosters and
132
00:06:35.070 --> 00:06:36.990
there were several of them, but one of them
133
00:06:37.230 --> 00:06:40.160
had a catastrophic failure and the, um,
134
00:06:40.240 --> 00:06:43.070
uh, the vehicle exploded as a consequence of
135
00:06:43.150 --> 00:06:46.030
that failure. And we all saw it,
136
00:06:46.030 --> 00:06:47.340
we all watched, um,
137
00:06:49.190 --> 00:06:49.950
was horrifying.
138
00:06:52.160 --> 00:06:53.890
Professor Fred Watson: Uh, indeed it was. I remember it very well
139
00:06:53.890 --> 00:06:56.760
too, of course. Um, so, yeah, it was
140
00:06:56.760 --> 00:06:58.690
um, nothing to do with the throttling up.
141
00:06:58.770 --> 00:07:00.890
That was just, that was just to get it going.
142
00:07:00.890 --> 00:07:02.130
Yeah, and
143
00:07:04.050 --> 00:07:06.890
they throttle back for the, um, maximum
144
00:07:06.890 --> 00:07:09.890
dynamic pressure, uh, region. When you've
145
00:07:09.890 --> 00:07:12.090
got the biggest aerodynamic forces, you
146
00:07:12.090 --> 00:07:13.530
Throttle back for that and then throttle up
147
00:07:13.530 --> 00:07:16.210
again. Um, and so it was
148
00:07:16.210 --> 00:07:19.060
eventually determined that, uh,
149
00:07:19.100 --> 00:07:21.660
what had happened was that the temperature on
150
00:07:21.660 --> 00:07:24.340
one side of the shuttle, uh, it was a cold
151
00:07:24.340 --> 00:07:26.340
morning, it was a winter morning, 28th of
152
00:07:26.340 --> 00:07:29.260
January, 2 degrees, I think it was 2 degrees
153
00:07:29.260 --> 00:07:32.180
above zero ambient when they launched. But
154
00:07:32.180 --> 00:07:34.780
one of the one side of the
155
00:07:35.100 --> 00:07:37.780
throttle, sorry, the shuttle and its boosters
156
00:07:37.780 --> 00:07:40.740
were still at minus two. And uh, those
157
00:07:40.740 --> 00:07:43.540
temperatures, um, those O
158
00:07:43.540 --> 00:07:46.380
rings become effectively, uh, non
159
00:07:46.380 --> 00:07:49.030
pliable. They, they don't, you know, they're
160
00:07:49.030 --> 00:07:51.870
not flexible. Uh, and so that's what
161
00:07:51.870 --> 00:07:54.230
allowed the fact that it was not behaving
162
00:07:54.230 --> 00:07:56.350
properly allowed gas to escape from that
163
00:07:56.350 --> 00:07:58.910
joint as exactly as you've said. There are
164
00:07:58.910 --> 00:08:01.750
four sections to the shuttle booster, each
165
00:08:01.910 --> 00:08:04.230
sealed by O rings. And it was the lower one,
166
00:08:04.750 --> 00:08:07.350
um, where combustion was at its extreme.
167
00:08:07.750 --> 00:08:10.470
Uh, it uh, meant the gases came through. And
168
00:08:10.790 --> 00:08:13.310
in fact, uh, there is footage that shows
169
00:08:13.310 --> 00:08:15.750
exactly that, uh, with these hot gases
170
00:08:15.750 --> 00:08:18.080
playing on the main fuel tank, um,
171
00:08:19.010 --> 00:08:21.810
the external fuel tank of the shuttle. So it
172
00:08:21.810 --> 00:08:24.650
was, uh, very much their fate was
173
00:08:24.650 --> 00:08:27.250
sealed even before launch, basically. And
174
00:08:27.730 --> 00:08:29.850
there were people at the company who built
175
00:08:29.850 --> 00:08:32.050
the boosters. Morton FIRE call who knew that.
176
00:08:32.130 --> 00:08:34.530
And they were overridden in their
177
00:08:34.610 --> 00:08:36.610
warnings that this was likely to be
178
00:08:36.610 --> 00:08:37.170
dangerous.
179
00:08:37.570 --> 00:08:40.290
Andrew Dunkley: They raised concerns a long time before this
180
00:08:40.290 --> 00:08:43.050
happened. In fact, uh, they'd discovered
181
00:08:43.050 --> 00:08:45.490
damage in the O rings from previous missions.
182
00:08:46.630 --> 00:08:49.190
And even the night before
183
00:08:49.430 --> 00:08:52.230
the launch they held a meeting to say,
184
00:08:52.230 --> 00:08:54.110
we don't think you've got to scrub the
185
00:08:54.110 --> 00:08:56.310
launch. It's not safe,
186
00:08:57.270 --> 00:09:00.110
something dreadful could happen. And I
187
00:09:00.110 --> 00:09:02.990
think, uh, the factor that
188
00:09:02.990 --> 00:09:04.470
made the difference, as you said, was the
189
00:09:04.470 --> 00:09:07.350
temperature that morning. Um, because
190
00:09:08.070 --> 00:09:10.870
previous flights were warmer.
191
00:09:10.950 --> 00:09:12.230
It was warmer, Yeah.
192
00:09:12.230 --> 00:09:14.670
Professor Fred Watson: I think 12 degrees was the lowest they'd ever
193
00:09:14.670 --> 00:09:17.310
launched at. And it was two that morning, as
194
00:09:17.310 --> 00:09:19.970
you said. Um, and one of the
195
00:09:19.970 --> 00:09:22.490
reasons for the
196
00:09:22.490 --> 00:09:25.330
reluctance to scrub the mission may have
197
00:09:25.330 --> 00:09:27.730
been the fact that we did have
198
00:09:28.130 --> 00:09:30.610
this teacher, uh, on board,
199
00:09:31.570 --> 00:09:33.650
Christina McAuliffe, that's her name, I
200
00:09:33.650 --> 00:09:36.310
think. Um, she was, uh,
201
00:09:36.530 --> 00:09:39.270
a schoolteacher, not an astronaut. Uh,
202
00:09:39.270 --> 00:09:41.170
she'd engaged many, many schools
203
00:09:41.970 --> 00:09:44.530
across the country. So
204
00:09:45.110 --> 00:09:47.590
huge numbers of people were watching. And
205
00:09:47.670 --> 00:09:50.470
NASA had done that purposely, I think, to
206
00:09:50.710 --> 00:09:52.950
sort of inject some more interest into the
207
00:09:52.950 --> 00:09:54.710
shuttle program. Because they'd had 25
208
00:09:54.710 --> 00:09:57.190
successful launches and it was becoming
209
00:09:57.750 --> 00:10:00.470
basically routine. Um, you know,
210
00:10:00.629 --> 00:10:03.180
very. People were blase about it. Uh,
211
00:10:03.350 --> 00:10:06.270
but just to also confirm
212
00:10:06.270 --> 00:10:08.910
that there were a further 87 successful
213
00:10:08.910 --> 00:10:11.470
shuttle launches after that. So the problems
214
00:10:11.470 --> 00:10:13.990
were fixed and, uh, the lessons were learned.
215
00:10:14.730 --> 00:10:17.600
Um, it was a tragedy, of course,
216
00:10:17.600 --> 00:10:19.440
a human tragedy. With the loss of life.
217
00:10:19.950 --> 00:10:22.800
Uh, I noticed something yesterday that
218
00:10:22.800 --> 00:10:25.270
blew me away, Andrew. Um,
219
00:10:25.600 --> 00:10:27.840
there are 17 astronauts
220
00:10:28.320 --> 00:10:30.800
were lost, uh, in NASA
221
00:10:30.800 --> 00:10:33.130
programs. The three, um,
222
00:10:33.840 --> 00:10:36.840
Apollo 1 astronauts who died in
223
00:10:36.840 --> 00:10:39.600
the fire on the ground, uh, of the Apollo 1
224
00:10:39.900 --> 00:10:41.980
uh, capsule. That was on the
225
00:10:42.720 --> 00:10:45.104
uh, 27th of January
226
00:10:45.336 --> 00:10:48.150
1967. Yes, the uh,
227
00:10:48.620 --> 00:10:51.340
Columbia disaster, uh, when
228
00:10:51.820 --> 00:10:54.740
re. Um entry was um, basically turned
229
00:10:54.740 --> 00:10:57.420
into a uh, you know, a disintegration because
230
00:10:57.420 --> 00:11:00.380
of damage uh, to the, to the shuttle wing.
231
00:11:00.620 --> 00:11:02.300
Andrew Dunkley: That wasn't it.
232
00:11:02.940 --> 00:11:05.140
Professor Fred Watson: That's correct. That was on the 1st of
233
00:11:05.140 --> 00:11:07.420
February 2003. So these
234
00:11:08.100 --> 00:11:11.020
losses of life, we're all within a
235
00:11:11.020 --> 00:11:13.620
week of each other in anniversary times.
236
00:11:13.780 --> 00:11:16.500
It's quite amazing. So, yes, the
237
00:11:16.660 --> 00:11:19.540
Challenger disaster, uh, 59
238
00:11:19.700 --> 00:11:22.460
years before, uh, the day before we'd lost
239
00:11:22.460 --> 00:11:24.920
the Apollo 1 crew. And uh,
240
00:11:26.110 --> 00:11:28.700
um. It's a coincidence, but it's a spooky
241
00:11:28.700 --> 00:11:28.980
one.
242
00:11:29.060 --> 00:11:31.700
Andrew Dunkley: It is very spooky. I remember where I was
243
00:11:31.700 --> 00:11:34.260
when the news broke. I just got in my car
244
00:11:34.660 --> 00:11:37.640
and um, I naturally
245
00:11:37.640 --> 00:11:39.880
had the radio on being someone who worked in
246
00:11:39.880 --> 00:11:42.880
the industry. And uh, the news came on
247
00:11:42.880 --> 00:11:45.600
as I was backing the car out and I just
248
00:11:45.600 --> 00:11:48.080
stopped in my tracks and I just shook. I
249
00:11:48.080 --> 00:11:50.120
couldn't believe it. Um,
250
00:11:50.960 --> 00:11:53.720
and, and what really haunts me is that only a
251
00:11:53.720 --> 00:11:56.560
week before I'd been talking to my
252
00:11:56.560 --> 00:11:58.320
future sister in law who was still in high
253
00:11:58.320 --> 00:12:00.400
school at the time. And she brought it up
254
00:12:00.400 --> 00:12:02.580
with me about the space shuttle program. And
255
00:12:02.580 --> 00:12:05.180
I said what worries me is something
256
00:12:05.420 --> 00:12:07.580
horribly wrong is going to happen.
257
00:12:08.140 --> 00:12:10.900
Yeah, uh, I, I think, I think they're
258
00:12:10.900 --> 00:12:13.860
actually being too gung ho. Those. That's
259
00:12:13.860 --> 00:12:16.780
what I said to her. And I couldn't believe
260
00:12:16.780 --> 00:12:19.060
less. You know, about a week later this
261
00:12:19.060 --> 00:12:19.580
happened.
262
00:12:19.820 --> 00:12:21.940
Professor Fred Watson: Uh, well, you were right in, in a way that's
263
00:12:21.940 --> 00:12:23.660
sort of what, what led to it.
264
00:12:23.900 --> 00:12:25.980
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah, yeah. Uh, but the same thing,
265
00:12:26.980 --> 00:12:29.300
uh, as you mentioned with the, the loss of
266
00:12:29.300 --> 00:12:31.620
interest in the space shuttle program from
267
00:12:31.620 --> 00:12:34.240
the public perspect, uh, happened with
268
00:12:34.240 --> 00:12:36.760
Apollo like they supposed to, they were
269
00:12:36.760 --> 00:12:38.480
supposed to have more missions but they just
270
00:12:38.480 --> 00:12:40.720
went no, no one's interested anymore. So they
271
00:12:40.720 --> 00:12:43.520
stopped at 17 and. Quite
272
00:12:43.520 --> 00:12:46.480
right. And, and I, I suppose these
273
00:12:46.480 --> 00:12:49.280
days space travel has just become
274
00:12:49.280 --> 00:12:51.200
routine. There are missions going up and down
275
00:12:51.200 --> 00:12:53.880
all the time we never hear about because
276
00:12:54.440 --> 00:12:57.240
it's just it, it's so very regular
277
00:12:57.240 --> 00:12:59.400
now. And, and when you bring in the private
278
00:12:59.400 --> 00:13:01.160
sector on top of that there's launches every
279
00:13:01.160 --> 00:13:03.400
other day. It's, it's just happening.
280
00:13:04.520 --> 00:13:06.160
And was always going to go that way, I
281
00:13:06.160 --> 00:13:07.880
suppose. Uh, but
282
00:13:08.680 --> 00:13:11.600
um, you've got to spare a thought for
283
00:13:11.600 --> 00:13:14.040
the pioneers that uh, sacrificed their lives
284
00:13:14.040 --> 00:13:16.000
to make all this possible. Because without
285
00:13:16.000 --> 00:13:18.600
them it just would never have got to the
286
00:13:18.600 --> 00:13:21.440
point it is now. And I think
287
00:13:21.440 --> 00:13:23.520
we've said it before. You go back to the
288
00:13:23.520 --> 00:13:26.160
history of flight and we got to the moon in
289
00:13:26.160 --> 00:13:29.000
less than 100 years of the first flight by
290
00:13:29.000 --> 00:13:31.960
a human being in a, in a um, purpose
291
00:13:31.960 --> 00:13:34.480
built uh, aircraft. It's just
292
00:13:34.480 --> 00:13:37.360
extraordinary to think that we,
293
00:13:37.360 --> 00:13:40.160
we could have leapt so far so fast. And I
294
00:13:40.160 --> 00:13:42.000
suppose when you do that there is a price.
295
00:13:42.000 --> 00:13:44.480
And this was one of the, one of the costs
296
00:13:44.800 --> 00:13:47.680
of uh, of space travel and aeronautics and
297
00:13:48.560 --> 00:13:51.440
yeah, it was very sad day and um, one I will
298
00:13:51.440 --> 00:13:52.960
never forget. Red.
299
00:13:54.740 --> 00:13:57.500
Uh, we will leave Challenger there um,
300
00:13:57.500 --> 00:14:00.080
to some happier news and of course
301
00:14:00.480 --> 00:14:03.340
uh, the other celebrated Australia
302
00:14:03.420 --> 00:14:06.220
Day in this country. 26th of January
303
00:14:07.340 --> 00:14:10.320
and every year we uh,
304
00:14:10.540 --> 00:14:13.140
have the announcement of the Australian of
305
00:14:13.140 --> 00:14:15.420
the Year. Now quite often it's a sports star.
306
00:14:16.460 --> 00:14:19.340
That usually, usually happens. Uh, although
307
00:14:19.340 --> 00:14:21.820
in recent years they've been focusing more on
308
00:14:21.900 --> 00:14:24.460
the academic side of things or the medical
309
00:14:24.460 --> 00:14:27.380
side of things. Which is, which is good. This
310
00:14:27.380 --> 00:14:29.700
year though, uh, you must be really pleased.
311
00:14:29.700 --> 00:14:32.060
It is an Australian astronaut,
312
00:14:33.490 --> 00:14:34.230
uh, absolutely.
313
00:14:34.230 --> 00:14:36.150
Professor Fred Watson: Delighted, yeah really thrilled about that.
314
00:14:36.490 --> 00:14:39.190
Um, she's an astronaut
315
00:14:39.190 --> 00:14:41.470
who uh, has been qualified under
316
00:14:41.470 --> 00:14:44.350
ESA's Program Astronaut Program, uh, the
317
00:14:44.350 --> 00:14:46.630
European Space Agency. She hasn't flown yet.
318
00:14:47.110 --> 00:14:48.990
Uh, there's every chance that she will, that
319
00:14:48.990 --> 00:14:51.830
she will fly to the space station, uh, and
320
00:14:52.150 --> 00:14:55.070
fulfill a mission. Catherine bennelpegg
321
00:14:55.070 --> 00:14:57.510
is her name. I discovered um, yesterday,
322
00:14:58.130 --> 00:15:01.090
looking at dates yesterday obviously um, she
323
00:15:01.330 --> 00:15:04.210
is one day short of 40 years younger
324
00:15:04.210 --> 00:15:06.970
than me but her birthday is the day
325
00:15:06.970 --> 00:15:08.770
after mine. So
326
00:15:09.730 --> 00:15:12.690
that's a non coincidence. But um, not
327
00:15:12.690 --> 00:15:15.130
only an astronaut, but she is also Director
328
00:15:15.130 --> 00:15:17.290
of Space Technology at the Australian Space
329
00:15:17.290 --> 00:15:19.900
Agency which was um, very much um,
330
00:15:20.690 --> 00:15:23.250
close to my heart in the work that I did for
331
00:15:23.250 --> 00:15:25.490
the government, the Australian Space Agency,
332
00:15:25.880 --> 00:15:27.570
uh, a sister organization within the
333
00:15:27.570 --> 00:15:28.910
Department of the Industry, Science and
334
00:15:28.910 --> 00:15:31.150
Resources where I worked. So uh, a lot of
335
00:15:31.150 --> 00:15:34.140
friends there. Um, and Catherine uh,
336
00:15:34.140 --> 00:15:36.630
is uh, absolutely
337
00:15:37.030 --> 00:15:39.510
well deserved recipient of the
338
00:15:39.510 --> 00:15:41.790
annual Australian of the Year award and
339
00:15:41.790 --> 00:15:44.430
she'll do great things with it. She wants to
340
00:15:44.430 --> 00:15:46.550
be um, very much a STEM
341
00:15:46.790 --> 00:15:49.510
ambassador as well for public ed,
342
00:15:49.510 --> 00:15:51.830
for education, uh, for science, technology,
343
00:15:52.150 --> 00:15:54.070
education. She'll do a great job. She's a
344
00:15:54.070 --> 00:15:54.630
lovely person.
345
00:15:55.360 --> 00:15:58.240
Andrew Dunkley: Yes, um, she comes across that way and
346
00:15:59.680 --> 00:16:02.520
I think the interest in space science is
347
00:16:02.520 --> 00:16:05.360
starting to really uh, grow from strength
348
00:16:05.360 --> 00:16:08.320
to strength and uh, she will do
349
00:16:08.640 --> 00:16:11.119
a wonderful job in that regard and
350
00:16:11.280 --> 00:16:13.800
maybe inspire other Australians to follow in
351
00:16:13.800 --> 00:16:16.760
her footsteps. And now that we have our own
352
00:16:16.760 --> 00:16:18.880
space agency. We certainly want that, don't
353
00:16:18.880 --> 00:16:19.120
we?
354
00:16:20.000 --> 00:16:22.120
Professor Fred Watson: Very much so, yes. The Australian Space
355
00:16:22.120 --> 00:16:24.480
Agency was formed in 2018.
356
00:16:24.720 --> 00:16:27.580
It's um, still going strong.
357
00:16:27.660 --> 00:16:30.500
A lot of its, uh, functions are regulatory.
358
00:16:30.500 --> 00:16:32.420
It's all about regulating launches and things
359
00:16:32.420 --> 00:16:35.220
of that sort, um, but also promoting
360
00:16:35.220 --> 00:16:38.140
startups and things of that sort to encourage
361
00:16:38.140 --> 00:16:40.300
the space industry here in Australia, which
362
00:16:40.300 --> 00:16:42.140
was why it was set up in the first place.
363
00:16:42.300 --> 00:16:42.779
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah.
364
00:16:42.779 --> 00:16:44.820
Professor Fred Watson: Catherine. Catherine's a great, you know, a
365
00:16:44.820 --> 00:16:46.700
great cheerleader for that. It's brilliant.
366
00:16:46.700 --> 00:16:48.580
Andrew Dunkley: She's got a busy year ahead of her now
367
00:16:48.580 --> 00:16:51.580
because her Australian of the Year duties
368
00:16:51.580 --> 00:16:53.900
will be on top of what she has to do for her
369
00:16:53.900 --> 00:16:56.860
regular gig. So she'll be doing a lot more
370
00:16:56.860 --> 00:16:58.530
travel, a lot more speaking, a lot more
371
00:16:58.680 --> 00:17:01.040
engagements. Uh, it, it's a big job when
372
00:17:01.040 --> 00:17:03.440
you're named Australian of the Year, so I'm
373
00:17:03.440 --> 00:17:03.720
told.
374
00:17:05.720 --> 00:17:08.120
Professor Fred Watson: Well, you never know. Andrew. One day. One
375
00:17:08.120 --> 00:17:09.320
day. Ah.
376
00:17:09.390 --> 00:17:12.240
Andrew Dunkley: Uh, look, I'd be, I'd be lucky to
377
00:17:12.240 --> 00:17:15.120
be named, you know, my street Member of
378
00:17:15.120 --> 00:17:18.040
the year. Not a
379
00:17:18.040 --> 00:17:20.960
big street either, but uh, no, good luck
380
00:17:20.960 --> 00:17:23.120
to her. And uh, congratulations to Catherine
381
00:17:23.120 --> 00:17:25.720
Bennell Pegg. This is Space
382
00:17:25.720 --> 00:17:28.280
Nuts with Andrew Dunkley and Professor
383
00:17:28.280 --> 00:17:28.760
Fred.
384
00:17:32.020 --> 00:17:34.020
Generic: Okay, we've had a problem here. This is
385
00:17:34.020 --> 00:17:35.140
Houston. Say again please.
386
00:17:35.620 --> 00:17:36.660
Andrew Dunkley: Houston, we've had a problem.
387
00:17:36.660 --> 00:17:39.020
Generic: We've had a main D bus. Roger made the
388
00:17:39.020 --> 00:17:41.220
interval. Okay, standby 13. We're looking at
389
00:17:41.220 --> 00:17:41.460
it.
390
00:17:42.980 --> 00:17:44.420
Andrew Dunkley: Do you like that, Fred? We've got some new
391
00:17:44.420 --> 00:17:47.380
links. I had a bit of time up my sleeve so
392
00:17:47.380 --> 00:17:48.700
I um, created some.
393
00:17:48.700 --> 00:17:51.340
Professor Fred Watson: New stuff that's a very appropriate one as
394
00:17:51.340 --> 00:17:51.620
well.
395
00:17:51.620 --> 00:17:53.780
Andrew Dunkley: Yes, I thought so too. Yeah.
396
00:17:53.780 --> 00:17:56.340
Uh, now our next story is
397
00:17:56.580 --> 00:17:59.390
about defining what is a moon.
398
00:17:59.470 --> 00:18:01.150
This has come about after
399
00:18:02.350 --> 00:18:04.990
a study been published, um, which
400
00:18:05.710 --> 00:18:08.710
is a, um, peer reviewed paper
401
00:18:08.710 --> 00:18:10.480
in the archive. Um,
402
00:18:11.790 --> 00:18:14.790
it's looking at a really big gas giant, but
403
00:18:14.790 --> 00:18:17.710
they think it's got a moon that could force
404
00:18:17.710 --> 00:18:19.710
us to redefine what a moon is.
405
00:18:20.510 --> 00:18:21.710
Is that the way it goes?
406
00:18:22.030 --> 00:18:24.790
Professor Fred Watson: Well, yeah, because it's big. That's
407
00:18:24.790 --> 00:18:25.070
right.
408
00:18:25.070 --> 00:18:26.190
Andrew Dunkley: I got that impression.
409
00:18:27.030 --> 00:18:29.830
Professor Fred Watson: Yeah. So, um, this is
410
00:18:30.080 --> 00:18:32.790
uh, work, uh, that's been done,
411
00:18:33.150 --> 00:18:35.390
uh, uh, actually led from the University of
412
00:18:35.390 --> 00:18:38.390
Cambridge using uh, a uh, thing called
413
00:18:38.390 --> 00:18:40.910
an interferometer, which is one of these
414
00:18:40.910 --> 00:18:43.350
things that brings light waves together and
415
00:18:43.430 --> 00:18:46.420
watches them cancel out. And by, um,
416
00:18:46.630 --> 00:18:49.350
doing that carefully enough, you can uh,
417
00:18:49.350 --> 00:18:51.110
learn a lot more than you otherwise could.
418
00:18:51.450 --> 00:18:53.660
Uh, and there is an interferometer which is
419
00:18:53.660 --> 00:18:56.260
called gravity. Uh, good name for it because,
420
00:18:56.510 --> 00:18:58.750
uh, that's one of its tasks was to um,
421
00:18:59.700 --> 00:19:01.670
kind of look at the. Look at the um,
422
00:19:01.780 --> 00:19:03.740
gravitational forces around black holes,
423
00:19:03.740 --> 00:19:05.780
which is done very successfully around the
424
00:19:05.780 --> 00:19:07.540
black hole at the center of our galaxy. It's
425
00:19:07.540 --> 00:19:09.740
on the Very Large Telescope in Chile. And
426
00:19:09.740 --> 00:19:12.740
it's a way of, you will know and some
427
00:19:12.740 --> 00:19:14.460
of your listeners, sorry, some of our
428
00:19:14.460 --> 00:19:16.860
listeners will remember, uh, that the Very
429
00:19:16.860 --> 00:19:19.860
Large telescope is actually 4 8.2 meter
430
00:19:20.080 --> 00:19:22.320
uh, telescopes which can be used together,
431
00:19:22.760 --> 00:19:25.480
uh, along with um, some auxiliary telescopes
432
00:19:25.480 --> 00:19:28.480
as well. And that's uh, they're used together
433
00:19:29.040 --> 00:19:31.160
in the science of
434
00:19:31.160 --> 00:19:33.810
interferometry, which lets you uh,
435
00:19:33.840 --> 00:19:36.720
look at um, objects in space
436
00:19:36.800 --> 00:19:39.520
in very great detail. And in particular,
437
00:19:40.280 --> 00:19:42.480
uh, the scientists have been watching the
438
00:19:42.480 --> 00:19:45.170
orbit of a gas giant, uh,
439
00:19:46.080 --> 00:19:48.700
uh, exoplanet, which
440
00:19:49.020 --> 00:19:50.700
has the Lovely name of HD
441
00:19:50.700 --> 00:19:53.060
206893B. It's
442
00:19:53.060 --> 00:19:56.060
133 light years from our uh, solar system
443
00:19:56.060 --> 00:19:58.820
as the crow flies. Um, but what they've done
444
00:19:58.820 --> 00:20:01.820
is they've watched the motion of this gas
445
00:20:01.820 --> 00:20:04.620
giant, uh, uh, as it
446
00:20:04.660 --> 00:20:06.900
uh, orbits around its parent star, which is
447
00:20:06.900 --> 00:20:09.860
HD 206893 itself. The
448
00:20:09.860 --> 00:20:12.220
B refers at the end of that refers to the gas
449
00:20:12.220 --> 00:20:15.070
giant planet itself. But what they've seen is
450
00:20:15.070 --> 00:20:17.830
that the orbit of this giant planet
451
00:20:17.990 --> 00:20:20.790
is wobbling slightly as it goes around
452
00:20:21.830 --> 00:20:24.790
little, um, you know, deviations, uh, from
453
00:20:24.790 --> 00:20:27.030
a perfect ellipse which are
454
00:20:27.030 --> 00:20:29.670
interpreted uh, as being due
455
00:20:29.990 --> 00:20:32.710
to a moon. And
456
00:20:32.950 --> 00:20:35.870
by knowing the, knowing the mass of
457
00:20:35.870 --> 00:20:38.230
the, or estimating the mass of the planet
458
00:20:38.230 --> 00:20:41.110
itself, um, you can estimate the
459
00:20:41.110 --> 00:20:43.870
mass of this moon and it's, it's
460
00:20:43.870 --> 00:20:46.550
enormous. Uh, it's um, many
461
00:20:46.930 --> 00:20:49.490
times the mass. If, uh, I remember rightly,
462
00:20:49.600 --> 00:20:51.850
uh, something like nine times the mass of
463
00:20:51.850 --> 00:20:54.490
Neptune, 40% of the mass of
464
00:20:54.490 --> 00:20:57.450
Jupiter. Uh, and you
465
00:20:57.450 --> 00:20:59.090
know, when you compare that with the moons in
466
00:20:59.090 --> 00:21:01.930
our solar system, it's much, much heavier
467
00:21:01.930 --> 00:21:04.810
than anything or much, much more massive
468
00:21:04.810 --> 00:21:07.410
than anything we've got. Uh, so
469
00:21:07.810 --> 00:21:10.690
that leads to the question, well,
470
00:21:10.770 --> 00:21:12.610
you know, if you've got something that's nine
471
00:21:12.610 --> 00:21:14.690
times the mass of Neptune, could you ever
472
00:21:14.690 --> 00:21:17.370
call it a moon? Uh, but the normal definition
473
00:21:17.370 --> 00:21:19.870
of a moon or satellite is
474
00:21:20.030 --> 00:21:22.830
something that is in orbit around an object
475
00:21:22.830 --> 00:21:25.350
that is in orbit around a star. In other
476
00:21:25.350 --> 00:21:28.110
words, a planet. Um, so do we want to
477
00:21:28.110 --> 00:21:30.670
bend that definition or are we just content
478
00:21:30.750 --> 00:21:33.550
for this thing to be the most massive moon
479
00:21:33.550 --> 00:21:33.870
known?
480
00:21:34.750 --> 00:21:36.190
Andrew Dunkley: Well, where do you draw the line?
481
00:21:37.950 --> 00:21:40.310
You know, if the definition is a satellite
482
00:21:40.310 --> 00:21:43.070
orbiting at a, an object orbiting a
483
00:21:43.070 --> 00:21:45.760
star, then that's. It shouldn't matter how
484
00:21:45.760 --> 00:21:46.680
big it is, should it?
485
00:21:48.130 --> 00:21:50.360
Professor Fred Watson: Uh, no, that's right, that would be my view,
486
00:21:50.450 --> 00:21:53.280
uh, that um, you
487
00:21:53.280 --> 00:21:56.050
keep the Basically keep the definition, uh,
488
00:21:56.680 --> 00:21:59.640
as it stands, uh, what you do is you just
489
00:21:59.720 --> 00:22:02.620
extend your range of uh,
490
00:22:04.040 --> 00:22:06.680
expectancy in terms of
491
00:22:07.310 --> 00:22:09.920
uh, the size of these objects. Um,
492
00:22:10.740 --> 00:22:13.540
there's a, in fact there's a lovely comment.
493
00:22:13.540 --> 00:22:14.980
There's several comments from the lead
494
00:22:14.980 --> 00:22:17.300
author. Uh, I'm looking just to say where
495
00:22:17.300 --> 00:22:18.940
we're looking. We're looking at Daily Galaxy
496
00:22:18.940 --> 00:22:21.340
for this report, but it's a paper, uh, that's
497
00:22:21.340 --> 00:22:23.020
been published I uh, think in Monthly
498
00:22:23.020 --> 00:22:25.300
Notices, again, uh, one of the leading
499
00:22:25.300 --> 00:22:27.780
journals anyway, um, and
500
00:22:28.340 --> 00:22:30.780
the uh, you know, the, the
501
00:22:30.780 --> 00:22:33.380
quotation from Quentin Crowell, who's one of
502
00:22:33.380 --> 00:22:36.110
the authors, I think the lead author of this
503
00:22:36.110 --> 00:22:38.870
paper. Um, uh, some
504
00:22:38.870 --> 00:22:40.790
nice quotes. What we found is that
505
00:22:40.790 --> 00:22:43.590
HD20683B doesn't just
506
00:22:43.590 --> 00:22:46.070
follow a smooth orbit around its star. On top
507
00:22:46.070 --> 00:22:47.830
of that motion, it shows a small but
508
00:22:47.830 --> 00:22:50.430
measurable back and forth wobble. Wobble has
509
00:22:50.430 --> 00:22:53.270
a period of nine months and a size comparable
510
00:22:53.270 --> 00:22:55.750
to the Earth Moon distance. This kind of
511
00:22:55.750 --> 00:22:57.670
signal is exactly what you'd expect if the
512
00:22:57.670 --> 00:22:59.550
object were being tugged by an unseen
513
00:22:59.550 --> 00:23:02.350
companion such as a large moon, making this
514
00:23:02.350 --> 00:23:04.830
system a particularly intriguing
515
00:23:04.830 --> 00:23:07.020
candidate for hosting an
516
00:23:07.020 --> 00:23:09.820
exomoon. Um, and goes on
517
00:23:09.820 --> 00:23:12.300
to say um, uh,
518
00:23:13.180 --> 00:23:15.540
uh, this raises the question because of the
519
00:23:15.540 --> 00:23:17.460
mass of this moon, this naturally raises the
520
00:23:17.460 --> 00:23:19.180
question of whether such an object should
521
00:23:19.180 --> 00:23:21.700
even be called a moon. These masses, the
522
00:23:21.700 --> 00:23:24.060
distinction between a massive moon and a very
523
00:23:24.060 --> 00:23:26.940
low mass companion becomes blurred.
524
00:23:27.340 --> 00:23:29.780
However, there is currently no definition of
525
00:23:29.780 --> 00:23:32.420
an exomoon and in practice astronomers
526
00:23:32.420 --> 00:23:35.180
generally for generally refer to any object
527
00:23:35.180 --> 00:23:38.180
orbiting a planet or substellar companion
528
00:23:38.420 --> 00:23:41.140
as a moon. So that's the bottom line.
529
00:23:41.920 --> 00:23:44.220
Um, uh, there are not many known and that's
530
00:23:44.220 --> 00:23:46.980
because moons naturally are generally small
531
00:23:47.220 --> 00:23:50.140
and so their effect on their, on
532
00:23:50.140 --> 00:23:52.820
the planet around which they're orbiting is
533
00:23:53.140 --> 00:23:55.860
too small to uh, discover.
534
00:23:56.260 --> 00:23:59.140
Whereas uh, this thing is so big that its
535
00:23:59.140 --> 00:24:01.640
signal is really quite, uh,
536
00:24:01.640 --> 00:24:04.360
quite impressive. It's uh,
537
00:24:04.360 --> 00:24:06.750
sufficient for this team to
538
00:24:07.230 --> 00:24:09.710
give us the paper that we're talking about.
539
00:24:09.950 --> 00:24:12.220
Just one final quote, uh, from Kral. Uh,
540
00:24:12.990 --> 00:24:15.110
it's important to keep in mind that we're
541
00:24:15.110 --> 00:24:17.310
likely only seeing the tip of the iceberg,
542
00:24:17.470 --> 00:24:19.830
just as the first exoplanets discovered were
543
00:24:19.830 --> 00:24:21.990
the most massive ones orbiting very close to
544
00:24:21.990 --> 00:24:23.990
their stars simply because they were the
545
00:24:23.990 --> 00:24:26.630
easiest to detect. The first exomoons we
546
00:24:26.630 --> 00:24:29.390
identify are expected to be the most massive
547
00:24:29.390 --> 00:24:31.430
and extreme examples. It's a really good
548
00:24:31.430 --> 00:24:31.750
point.
549
00:24:31.830 --> 00:24:34.310
Andrew Dunkley: And there it is. And, and yet again we
550
00:24:34.470 --> 00:24:37.430
find in a potential new discovery
551
00:24:37.510 --> 00:24:40.310
that it's not what
552
00:24:40.310 --> 00:24:43.110
we would expect to be the norm. This, this is
553
00:24:43.830 --> 00:24:46.629
Another thing that we may not have
554
00:24:46.629 --> 00:24:47.430
anticipated.
555
00:24:48.560 --> 00:24:51.350
Professor Fred Watson: Uh, that's. That's right. Um, so.
556
00:24:51.830 --> 00:24:54.710
Yes. So, I mean, the point is well made.
557
00:24:54.950 --> 00:24:57.930
Quentin's point is well made that the, uh,
558
00:24:58.310 --> 00:25:00.970
the. The. That you're going to find the.
559
00:25:01.370 --> 00:25:03.650
The real outliers first because they're the
560
00:25:03.650 --> 00:25:06.600
easiest ones to find. Uh, but at, uh,
561
00:25:06.690 --> 00:25:09.140
the same time, what you've said is true. Uh,
562
00:25:09.140 --> 00:25:11.810
the outliers are sometimes so surprising that
563
00:25:11.810 --> 00:25:14.210
they're difficult to believe. Uh, but we've
564
00:25:14.210 --> 00:25:16.250
got a, um. Yeah, we've got an outlier here
565
00:25:16.250 --> 00:25:18.770
that might well be the first of a new breed
566
00:25:18.770 --> 00:25:21.490
of, uh. Or a whole new regime of
567
00:25:21.490 --> 00:25:23.130
exomoon discoveries.
568
00:25:23.290 --> 00:25:26.090
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah, I didn't even think about exomoons.
569
00:25:26.090 --> 00:25:28.620
Like, we've discovered so many exoplanets
570
00:25:28.620 --> 00:25:31.540
now, and we continue to do so, but we haven't
571
00:25:31.540 --> 00:25:34.380
actually laid our eyes on an exomoon yet.
572
00:25:35.820 --> 00:25:37.860
Professor Fred Watson: No. Um, and m. In fact, we've not laid our
573
00:25:37.860 --> 00:25:39.860
eyes on most of the exoplanets. We've
574
00:25:39.860 --> 00:25:42.580
inferred their presence, uh, by indirect
575
00:25:42.580 --> 00:25:45.340
means. There are one or two, uh, that we can
576
00:25:45.340 --> 00:25:47.780
observe directly. Uh, but when you think,
577
00:25:47.780 --> 00:25:49.460
yes, moons are always going to be smaller
578
00:25:49.460 --> 00:25:51.740
than their parent planets, um,
579
00:25:52.310 --> 00:25:54.680
that means that, uh,
580
00:25:56.070 --> 00:25:58.550
we're still pushing the limits of what is
581
00:25:58.550 --> 00:26:00.550
technically possible to detect.
582
00:26:01.270 --> 00:26:04.150
Andrew Dunkley: Could we maybe redefine this discovery
583
00:26:04.150 --> 00:26:05.990
as, uh, like a dual planet?
584
00:26:07.749 --> 00:26:09.990
Professor Fred Watson: So there is a definition of a dual planet,
585
00:26:10.160 --> 00:26:12.790
um, what we call a binary planet,
586
00:26:13.260 --> 00:26:15.270
uh, which is, uh. If you have
587
00:26:15.990 --> 00:26:18.230
two objects, one orbiting the other,
588
00:26:18.880 --> 00:26:21.080
if their center of gravity, or what we call
589
00:26:21.080 --> 00:26:24.080
the barycenter, is outside the body of either
590
00:26:24.080 --> 00:26:26.800
of them, then it's a binary planet
591
00:26:26.800 --> 00:26:28.720
rather than a planet and a moon.
592
00:26:29.450 --> 00:26:31.840
Uh, and in fact,
593
00:26:32.190 --> 00:26:35.080
uh, Jupiter, sorry, Pluto and
594
00:26:35.080 --> 00:26:38.000
its moon Charon fit that bill. Pluto, of
595
00:26:38.000 --> 00:26:40.040
course, is a dwarf planet, but Pluto and
596
00:26:40.040 --> 00:26:42.680
Charon are probably a binary dwarf planet for
597
00:26:42.680 --> 00:26:43.200
that reason.
598
00:26:43.600 --> 00:26:44.950
Andrew Dunkley: Okay. Interesting.
599
00:26:44.950 --> 00:26:45.510
Professor Fred Watson: Yeah.
600
00:26:45.990 --> 00:26:48.710
Andrew Dunkley: So, um, there'll be more work
601
00:26:49.430 --> 00:26:52.310
to find out exactly what the situation
602
00:26:52.390 --> 00:26:55.070
is here, because it's only suspicion at the
603
00:26:55.070 --> 00:26:55.750
moment, isn't it?
604
00:26:56.630 --> 00:26:58.870
Professor Fred Watson: That's right. There will be more observations
605
00:26:59.270 --> 00:27:01.780
to confirm that, uh, uh,
606
00:27:02.630 --> 00:27:04.990
the planet itself behaves in a way that is
607
00:27:04.990 --> 00:27:06.870
consistent with this large
608
00:27:07.750 --> 00:27:10.670
hypothesized moon. We haven't seen it
609
00:27:10.670 --> 00:27:12.070
yet. In fact, we haven't seen the planet
610
00:27:12.070 --> 00:27:15.030
either. But, uh, we can deduce
611
00:27:15.030 --> 00:27:17.050
things from, uh, know, from the way the
612
00:27:17.050 --> 00:27:17.890
orbits behave.
613
00:27:18.130 --> 00:27:20.210
Andrew Dunkley: Yes, indeed. If you'd like to read about
614
00:27:20.210 --> 00:27:22.370
that, the, uh, study's been published on the
615
00:27:22.370 --> 00:27:24.570
archive, and it has been accepted for
616
00:27:24.570 --> 00:27:27.330
publication in Astronomy and Astrophysics.
617
00:27:27.730 --> 00:27:29.570
You can also read about it on the
618
00:27:29.570 --> 00:27:32.210
dailygalaxy.com uh, website.
619
00:27:32.530 --> 00:27:35.450
This is Space Nuts with Andrew Dunkley and
620
00:27:35.450 --> 00:27:37.090
Professor Fred Watson.
621
00:27:41.330 --> 00:27:44.250
Generic: Tranquility Base here. The Eagle has landed.
622
00:27:44.250 --> 00:27:45.250
Professor Fred Watson: Space nets.
623
00:27:45.890 --> 00:27:48.770
Andrew Dunkley: Speaking of, um, big planets with big
624
00:27:48.770 --> 00:27:51.490
moons, what about big black holes,
625
00:27:51.730 --> 00:27:54.450
uh, and the fact that they get big fast. We
626
00:27:54.450 --> 00:27:56.610
have always been mystified by this
627
00:27:56.850 --> 00:27:59.730
phenomenon. Uh, uh, have they
628
00:27:59.730 --> 00:28:00.690
solved it, Fred?
629
00:28:01.730 --> 00:28:03.930
Professor Fred Watson: Uh, certainly some work that looks as though
630
00:28:03.930 --> 00:28:05.530
it's pointing in the right direction. Yeah,
631
00:28:05.530 --> 00:28:08.010
this comes about really. And it's uh, an
632
00:28:08.010 --> 00:28:10.970
issue that has uh, only arisen in the era of
633
00:28:10.970 --> 00:28:13.190
the James Webb Space Telescope when, uh,
634
00:28:13.190 --> 00:28:15.910
which has detected um,
635
00:28:15.930 --> 00:28:18.530
the evidence for supermassive black
636
00:28:18.530 --> 00:28:21.390
holes very, very early in the universe. Uh,
637
00:28:21.390 --> 00:28:23.330
until the Webb came along, we all thought
638
00:28:23.330 --> 00:28:26.250
that supermassive black holes evolved
639
00:28:26.250 --> 00:28:28.570
over timescales comparable with the age of
640
00:28:28.570 --> 00:28:30.290
the universe, that you started off with small
641
00:28:30.290 --> 00:28:33.130
black holes. And as time went on, you
642
00:28:33.130 --> 00:28:35.810
know, billions of years passing until we get
643
00:28:35.810 --> 00:28:38.610
to the universe's current age of 13.8 billion
644
00:28:38.610 --> 00:28:41.400
years, uh, that they gradually grew
645
00:28:41.400 --> 00:28:44.320
bigger to form the supermassive black holes
646
00:28:44.320 --> 00:28:46.240
that we see in today's universe. But when you
647
00:28:46.240 --> 00:28:48.560
look further back, further out into space, as
648
00:28:48.560 --> 00:28:50.360
the Webb has done, you're looking further
649
00:28:50.360 --> 00:28:52.240
back in time. We're now seeing within a few
650
00:28:52.240 --> 00:28:54.640
hundred million years of the Big Bang itself.
651
00:28:54.640 --> 00:28:57.080
And we find these supermassive black holes
652
00:28:57.320 --> 00:29:00.000
already there. Um, and that's the
653
00:29:00.000 --> 00:29:01.840
puzzle. That's the conundrum. How did they
654
00:29:01.840 --> 00:29:03.960
get so big so rapidly?
655
00:29:04.680 --> 00:29:06.050
And the.
656
00:29:06.530 --> 00:29:09.010
Andrew Dunkley: So, so they, they went to McDonald's. That's
657
00:29:09.010 --> 00:29:09.490
what they did.
658
00:29:12.110 --> 00:29:14.690
Professor Fred Watson: Uh, the McDonald's of the early universe.
659
00:29:14.690 --> 00:29:16.890
Yes. There must be a, must be a name for
660
00:29:16.890 --> 00:29:17.170
that.
661
00:29:17.350 --> 00:29:17.530
Generic: Um.
662
00:29:19.250 --> 00:29:21.570
Professor Fred Watson: Fast food. That's what it's not. It's fast
663
00:29:21.570 --> 00:29:23.890
food. Yeah, I was going to work on drive
664
00:29:23.890 --> 00:29:25.810
through somehow, but that doesn't scan quite
665
00:29:25.810 --> 00:29:28.770
the same way as fast food does. It is
666
00:29:28.770 --> 00:29:31.290
fast food. That's exactly. In fact, that sums
667
00:29:31.290 --> 00:29:33.930
up the, the research paper by this team of
668
00:29:33.930 --> 00:29:35.810
scientists who are actually based in Ireland,
669
00:29:37.470 --> 00:29:40.350
uh, sums up their work very, very succinctly.
670
00:29:40.590 --> 00:29:43.070
So the issue is, uh, that
671
00:29:43.590 --> 00:29:46.550
uh, as we, as the, you know, so
672
00:29:46.550 --> 00:29:49.510
what we've got is this observations, set
673
00:29:49.510 --> 00:29:52.110
of observations tells us that black holes
674
00:29:52.190 --> 00:29:55.070
got supermassive very quickly. And
675
00:29:55.470 --> 00:29:58.150
that's a puzzle for the theoretical
676
00:29:58.150 --> 00:30:01.070
astronomers who work out how
677
00:30:01.310 --> 00:30:04.030
galaxies work, how galaxies form, how black
678
00:30:04.030 --> 00:30:06.670
holes form, uh, and all of that
679
00:30:06.830 --> 00:30:09.590
great stuff in the early universe. And
680
00:30:09.830 --> 00:30:12.630
what um, has been the point
681
00:30:12.790 --> 00:30:15.790
that they've struggled with is that if
682
00:30:15.790 --> 00:30:18.310
a black hole starts eating
683
00:30:19.750 --> 00:30:22.190
the surrounding material, which is how they
684
00:30:22.190 --> 00:30:24.950
grow the gas and Dust that surrounds them.
685
00:30:25.029 --> 00:30:27.830
If they start eating that too quickly,
686
00:30:28.150 --> 00:30:30.630
in other words, quickly enough to grow into a
687
00:30:30.630 --> 00:30:32.990
supermassive black hole very quickly. What
688
00:30:32.990 --> 00:30:35.590
happens is um, the radiation
689
00:30:35.670 --> 00:30:38.630
generated by this swirling mass of stuff
690
00:30:38.870 --> 00:30:41.690
getting sucked in actually stops
691
00:30:41.930 --> 00:30:44.810
the process. It quenches the process
692
00:30:44.810 --> 00:30:47.530
of uh, accretion and the black
693
00:30:47.530 --> 00:30:50.410
holes growing. That's the way the
694
00:30:50.410 --> 00:30:53.370
theory has uh, appeared so far.
695
00:30:53.930 --> 00:30:56.730
But what the Irish astronomers have done
696
00:30:57.210 --> 00:30:59.530
is um, they've
697
00:30:59.690 --> 00:31:02.650
looked at the sort of general
698
00:31:02.810 --> 00:31:05.530
turbulence of the gas in the
699
00:31:05.530 --> 00:31:08.480
early universe, uh, as a background
700
00:31:08.720 --> 00:31:10.320
to the
701
00:31:11.440 --> 00:31:14.200
feeding black hole. And it turns
702
00:31:14.200 --> 00:31:17.200
out that if the universe
703
00:31:17.280 --> 00:31:20.160
is um, a lot more
704
00:31:20.650 --> 00:31:23.400
uh, chaotic, turbulent, very
705
00:31:23.400 --> 00:31:26.080
violent motions in the background gas, if
706
00:31:26.080 --> 00:31:28.920
you've got a black hole in an
707
00:31:28.920 --> 00:31:31.680
environment like that, um, it
708
00:31:31.680 --> 00:31:34.160
turns out that they can actually uh,
709
00:31:34.520 --> 00:31:37.400
absorb huge amounts of gas and
710
00:31:37.400 --> 00:31:40.200
so they can grow much faster than we
711
00:31:40.200 --> 00:31:43.200
originally thought. Uh, so, um, one
712
00:31:43.200 --> 00:31:46.040
of the authors, uh, of this paper,
713
00:31:46.470 --> 00:31:49.399
uh, there's a quote here, um, this is
714
00:31:49.399 --> 00:31:51.320
scitech Daily that uh, is carrying this
715
00:31:51.320 --> 00:31:54.200
story. But uh, the, the research is in one of
716
00:31:54.200 --> 00:31:55.600
the research papers, this is one of the
717
00:31:55.600 --> 00:31:58.120
authors saying we found that the chaotic
718
00:31:58.120 --> 00:32:01.040
conditions that existed in the early universe
719
00:32:01.040 --> 00:32:03.800
triggered early smaller black holes
720
00:32:03.800 --> 00:32:05.900
to grow into the supermarket. Massive black
721
00:32:05.900 --> 00:32:08.580
holes we see later. Following a feeding
722
00:32:08.580 --> 00:32:11.580
frenzy which devoured all the material
723
00:32:11.580 --> 00:32:14.380
around them, we revealed using state of the
724
00:32:14.380 --> 00:32:16.700
art computer simulations that the first
725
00:32:16.700 --> 00:32:18.980
generation of black holes, those born just a
726
00:32:18.980 --> 00:32:20.820
few hundred million years after the Big Bang,
727
00:32:20.980 --> 00:32:23.860
grew incredibly fast into tens
728
00:32:23.860 --> 00:32:26.580
of thousands of times the size of our Sun.
729
00:32:27.260 --> 00:32:28.660
Uh, and another comment,
730
00:32:30.160 --> 00:32:32.100
uh, from one of the other team members. This
731
00:32:32.100 --> 00:32:34.340
breakthrough unlocks one of astronomy's big
732
00:32:34.340 --> 00:32:37.210
puzzles, that being how black holes born in
733
00:32:37.360 --> 00:32:39.320
early universe are observed by the James Webb
734
00:32:39.320 --> 00:32:42.080
Space Telescope, uh, as observed by the James
735
00:32:42.080 --> 00:32:44.800
Webb Space Telescope, managed to reach such
736
00:32:45.040 --> 00:32:47.960
supermassive sizes so quickly. So
737
00:32:47.960 --> 00:32:49.600
maybe that's the answer to the puzzle,
738
00:32:49.600 --> 00:32:50.160
Andrew.
739
00:32:50.320 --> 00:32:52.560
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah, they ate too much too fast.
740
00:32:54.160 --> 00:32:55.600
Professor Fred Watson: That's right. Fast food.
741
00:32:56.240 --> 00:32:58.280
Andrew Dunkley: And then they get indigestion and then they
742
00:32:58.280 --> 00:32:59.760
have those, you know.
743
00:32:59.760 --> 00:33:01.520
Professor Fred Watson: Well, I think that was the problem before,
744
00:33:01.760 --> 00:33:04.280
uh, that you know, they got indigestion and
745
00:33:04.280 --> 00:33:07.120
so they stopped the process. But what these,
746
00:33:07.410 --> 00:33:09.810
these authors are saying is that if you put
747
00:33:09.810 --> 00:33:12.250
them in a really turbulent um,
748
00:33:12.930 --> 00:33:15.930
you know, field of gas, which
749
00:33:15.930 --> 00:33:18.210
we think was in the early universe, then
750
00:33:18.290 --> 00:33:21.050
things change. They don't get indigestion,
751
00:33:21.050 --> 00:33:22.290
they just go for it.
752
00:33:22.370 --> 00:33:25.090
Andrew Dunkley: They just eat and eat. They don't, don't
753
00:33:25.090 --> 00:33:26.130
notice that they're full.
754
00:33:27.090 --> 00:33:27.810
Professor Fred Watson: That's right.
755
00:33:27.810 --> 00:33:29.570
Andrew Dunkley: And keep eating like a goldfish.
756
00:33:29.730 --> 00:33:30.290
Professor Fred Watson: That's.
757
00:33:30.290 --> 00:33:32.490
Andrew Dunkley: Goldfish have that problem. That's what they
758
00:33:32.490 --> 00:33:34.210
say. Um, that's why they're so blobby
759
00:33:34.210 --> 00:33:34.490
looking.
760
00:33:34.730 --> 00:33:36.410
Professor Fred Watson: No, they don't want to stop eating.
761
00:33:36.490 --> 00:33:37.530
Andrew Dunkley: No, they don't. No.
762
00:33:37.770 --> 00:33:39.890
Professor Fred Watson: Apparently because they can't remember when
763
00:33:39.890 --> 00:33:40.650
they started eating.
764
00:33:42.810 --> 00:33:45.490
Andrew Dunkley: I don't believe that theory that goldfish
765
00:33:45.490 --> 00:33:47.210
only have a three minute memory because I
766
00:33:47.210 --> 00:33:50.010
used to keep goldfish and they knew who
767
00:33:50.010 --> 00:33:52.530
fed them because they always reacted when you
768
00:33:52.530 --> 00:33:55.330
went near the tank. Uh, the time to be. Time
769
00:33:55.330 --> 00:33:57.450
for food. Time for food. They're like dogs,
770
00:33:57.690 --> 00:34:00.240
except you can't take them for a walk. They
771
00:34:00.240 --> 00:34:01.080
tend to buy.
772
00:34:01.080 --> 00:34:01.720
Professor Fred Watson: Not yet.
773
00:34:04.200 --> 00:34:06.920
Got to take their bowl with them as well. If
774
00:34:06.920 --> 00:34:08.320
you try. Exactly.
775
00:34:08.320 --> 00:34:09.720
Andrew Dunkley: You put them in a dog bowl.
776
00:34:10.040 --> 00:34:10.920
Professor Fred Watson: Fill it with water.
777
00:34:11.160 --> 00:34:13.920
Andrew Dunkley: No, uh, let's not go there. Uh, but that's a
778
00:34:13.920 --> 00:34:16.560
fascinating story and, uh, another one that
779
00:34:16.560 --> 00:34:19.190
will probably be subject to future analysis.
780
00:34:19.190 --> 00:34:20.560
Uh, I imagine.
781
00:34:20.560 --> 00:34:21.800
Professor Fred Watson: Yep, that's right.
782
00:34:21.960 --> 00:34:23.840
Andrew Dunkley: If you'd like to read about it, as Fred said,
783
00:34:23.840 --> 00:34:26.400
it's in scitechdaily.com or you can read the
784
00:34:26.400 --> 00:34:28.600
entire paper, start to finish, if you're
785
00:34:28.600 --> 00:34:31.030
having trouble falling asleep. And that's in
786
00:34:31.030 --> 00:34:34.030
nature astronomy. Oh, dear. Um,
787
00:34:34.230 --> 00:34:36.070
we're just about done, Fred. Thank you very
788
00:34:36.070 --> 00:34:36.390
much.
789
00:34:36.790 --> 00:34:39.110
Professor Fred Watson: Oh, a pleasure, Andrew. Always good to talk.
790
00:34:39.190 --> 00:34:41.190
And, um, we'll see you next time.
791
00:34:41.350 --> 00:34:43.630
Andrew Dunkley: We will. Professor Fred Watson, Astronomer at
792
00:34:43.630 --> 00:34:45.990
large. Don't forget to visit us online in the
793
00:34:45.990 --> 00:34:48.990
meantime@spacenutspodcast.com or
794
00:34:48.990 --> 00:34:51.910
spacenuts IO you can have a
795
00:34:51.910 --> 00:34:53.670
look around. You can visit the shop, you can
796
00:34:53.670 --> 00:34:56.430
sign up for the daily news feed. Uh,
797
00:34:56.630 --> 00:34:58.790
if you hit the supporter page. There are ways
798
00:34:58.790 --> 00:35:01.430
to support us if you so desire. We will never
799
00:35:01.730 --> 00:35:04.730
make you do it. It's voluntary. And plenty of
800
00:35:04.730 --> 00:35:06.530
other things to see and do. And don't forget
801
00:35:06.530 --> 00:35:08.250
our social media while you're at it, the
802
00:35:08.250 --> 00:35:10.850
Space Nuts Facebook page or the
803
00:35:10.930 --> 00:35:13.730
podcast group on, uh, Facebook.
804
00:35:13.730 --> 00:35:15.610
They're very active. Always new members
805
00:35:15.610 --> 00:35:18.050
joining there. We're on Instagram as well.
806
00:35:18.530 --> 00:35:20.810
And I was going to say something else. Oh,
807
00:35:20.810 --> 00:35:23.490
no, I can't remember. Anyway, um, that's just
808
00:35:23.490 --> 00:35:25.330
about it. Um, also thanks to Huw in the
809
00:35:25.330 --> 00:35:27.950
studio who couldn't be with us today. He's,
810
00:35:27.950 --> 00:35:30.910
um, gone out to uh, the back to uh, to
811
00:35:30.910 --> 00:35:33.270
brood for not being named Australian of the
812
00:35:33.270 --> 00:35:35.750
Year. And from me, Andrew Dunkley. Thanks for
813
00:35:35.750 --> 00:35:37.550
your company. See you on the next episode of
814
00:35:37.550 --> 00:35:38.870
SpaceNuts. Bye bye.
815
00:35:40.230 --> 00:35:42.430
You've been listening to the Space Nuts
816
00:35:42.430 --> 00:35:45.390
podcast available at
817
00:35:45.390 --> 00:35:47.350
Apple Podcasts, Spotify,
818
00:35:47.590 --> 00:35:50.350
iHeartRadio or your favorite podcast
819
00:35:50.350 --> 00:35:52.070
player. You can also stream on
820
00:35:52.070 --> 00:35:55.030
demand@bytes.com. this has been another
821
00:35:55.030 --> 00:35:57.070
quality podcast production from
822
00:35:57.070 --> 00:35:58.230
bytes.um.com.
0
00:00:00.320 --> 00:00:00.640
Professor Fred Watson: Hi there.
1
00:00:00.640 --> 00:00:03.000
Andrew Dunkley: Thanks for joining us on Space Nuts, where we
2
00:00:03.000 --> 00:00:05.880
talk astronomy and space science, uh, twice
3
00:00:05.880 --> 00:00:08.360
a week in fact, and I'm glad you could join
4
00:00:08.360 --> 00:00:10.920
us yet again. Uh, today's
5
00:00:10.920 --> 00:00:13.820
episode has some great, uh,
6
00:00:14.160 --> 00:00:16.960
news, but also, uh, a bit of a sad
7
00:00:16.960 --> 00:00:19.720
reflection. It's 40 years since
8
00:00:19.720 --> 00:00:22.520
the Challenger space shuttle disaster.
9
00:00:22.520 --> 00:00:24.840
Can you believe that? 40 years. Of course,
10
00:00:24.840 --> 00:00:27.670
some of you listening to us won't
11
00:00:27.670 --> 00:00:30.350
remember it because you're 40. Uh, but, uh,
12
00:00:30.350 --> 00:00:32.120
for those of us who are a few years older,
13
00:00:32.120 --> 00:00:34.750
uh, it is, um, a very, very strong
14
00:00:34.830 --> 00:00:37.790
memory. We'll, uh, talk about that. On a
15
00:00:37.790 --> 00:00:40.430
happier note, we will reveal the Australian
16
00:00:40.430 --> 00:00:42.389
of the Year. I think most Australians will
17
00:00:42.389 --> 00:00:45.070
know who that is. Uh, how do you
18
00:00:45.070 --> 00:00:47.710
define a moon? That question has come up
19
00:00:47.710 --> 00:00:50.590
because of a potential discovery and
20
00:00:50.750 --> 00:00:53.030
they think they know why black holes are
21
00:00:53.030 --> 00:00:56.010
getting bigger fast. We'll
22
00:00:56.010 --> 00:00:58.530
talk about all of that on this episode of
23
00:00:58.530 --> 00:00:59.410
Space Nuts.
24
00:00:59.570 --> 00:01:02.050
Generic: 15 seconds. Guidance is internal.
25
00:01:02.290 --> 00:01:04.930
10, 9. Ignition
26
00:01:05.010 --> 00:01:05.970
sequence start.
27
00:01:06.130 --> 00:01:07.130
Professor Fred Watson: Space Nuts.
28
00:01:07.130 --> 00:01:09.816
Generic: 5, 4, 3. 2. 1. 2, 3, 4,
29
00:01:09.884 --> 00:01:12.370
5, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1. Space
30
00:01:12.530 --> 00:01:15.010
Nuts astronauts report it feels good.
31
00:01:16.130 --> 00:01:18.250
Andrew Dunkley: Joining us as always, is his good self,
32
00:01:18.250 --> 00:01:20.330
Professor Fred Watson, astronomer at large.
33
00:01:20.330 --> 00:01:21.010
Hello, Fred.
34
00:01:21.630 --> 00:01:23.070
Professor Fred Watson: Hello. It's good to be good.
35
00:01:23.470 --> 00:01:25.550
Andrew Dunkley: It is good to be good. It's good to see you.
36
00:01:26.990 --> 00:01:29.190
It's good to be in a cool room because it's
37
00:01:29.190 --> 00:01:31.230
not cool in our part of the world at the
38
00:01:31.230 --> 00:01:33.390
moment. We're right in the middle of a week
39
00:01:33.390 --> 00:01:35.870
long, uh, run of 40 plus
40
00:01:36.270 --> 00:01:38.330
Celsius temperatures. Uh,
41
00:01:38.990 --> 00:01:41.230
we've, uh, broken our uh, record
42
00:01:41.870 --> 00:01:44.590
in Dubbo for the hottest day in January
43
00:01:44.670 --> 00:01:45.590
and that was
44
00:01:45.590 --> 00:01:48.400
46.21 I think
45
00:01:48.400 --> 00:01:51.160
we had, uh, on Monday on Australia
46
00:01:51.320 --> 00:01:54.320
Day, which, um, yeah, it was dreadful.
47
00:01:54.320 --> 00:01:57.280
I mean it was just horrific. Um, so,
48
00:01:57.280 --> 00:01:58.920
yeah, it's, it's been a pretty rough week.
49
00:01:59.070 --> 00:02:01.440
Um, my plants are suffering. There's nothing
50
00:02:01.440 --> 00:02:04.280
I can do about it. And I, uh, think we're
51
00:02:04.280 --> 00:02:06.600
going to lose a few. So unfortunately, that's
52
00:02:06.600 --> 00:02:09.600
the way it goes. Um, I suppose that's what
53
00:02:09.600 --> 00:02:11.200
happens when they plant plants in an
54
00:02:11.200 --> 00:02:13.920
environment like this that um, don't come
55
00:02:13.920 --> 00:02:16.880
from here. They struggle. But,
56
00:02:16.900 --> 00:02:18.880
uh, yes, all, all is well with you?
57
00:02:19.820 --> 00:02:22.600
Professor Fred Watson: Uh, yeah, our plants, uh, pretty well are all
58
00:02:22.600 --> 00:02:25.600
natives, uh, in Marnie's garden. So they,
59
00:02:25.600 --> 00:02:27.160
they don't seem to mind.
60
00:02:27.160 --> 00:02:29.920
But we've got much more modest temperatures
61
00:02:29.920 --> 00:02:31.440
than you have here on the coast.
62
00:02:31.680 --> 00:02:33.320
Andrew Dunkley: Probably about 10 degrees cooler.
63
00:02:33.320 --> 00:02:36.240
Professor Fred Watson: I imagine it's not quite that, but
64
00:02:36.240 --> 00:02:39.040
not far off. Yeah, yeah, actually, no, it's
65
00:02:39.040 --> 00:02:41.800
more like 20 at the moment. 20
66
00:02:41.800 --> 00:02:44.000
degrees? Yeah, we're down at, um. But it's
67
00:02:44.000 --> 00:02:45.680
forecast to be 29 today, so.
68
00:02:45.910 --> 00:02:48.790
Andrew Dunkley: Yes, well, we're going to get to 41 I think
69
00:02:48.870 --> 00:02:51.870
today, so I think we're already pushing
70
00:02:51.870 --> 00:02:54.070
towards 30 as I speak. And it's only what,
71
00:02:54.230 --> 00:02:56.550
9:30 in the morning local time. So,
72
00:02:57.780 --> 00:02:59.710
um, we've got a lot to talk about, so we
73
00:02:59.710 --> 00:03:00.790
better get stuck into it.
74
00:03:00.800 --> 00:03:03.590
Uh, the first thing is, uh, something
75
00:03:03.590 --> 00:03:06.510
that, um, I don't think anyone who
76
00:03:06.510 --> 00:03:09.110
was around at the time will ever forget.
77
00:03:09.750 --> 00:03:12.460
I'm talking about the Challenger space
78
00:03:12.460 --> 00:03:14.660
shuttle launch, uh, in
79
00:03:14.660 --> 00:03:17.420
1986. And this is
80
00:03:17.420 --> 00:03:18.860
basically what happened.
81
00:03:19.740 --> 00:03:21.580
Generic: T minus 15 seconds.
82
00:03:24.700 --> 00:03:26.934
T minus 10, 9,
83
00:03:27.089 --> 00:03:30.060
8, 7, 6. We
84
00:03:30.060 --> 00:03:32.610
have main engine start. 4,
85
00:03:32.750 --> 00:03:34.780
3, 2, 1.
86
00:03:35.580 --> 00:03:36.780
And liftoff.
87
00:03:37.340 --> 00:03:37.830
Andrew Dunkley: Liftoff.
88
00:03:37.830 --> 00:03:40.820
Generic: Uh, of the 25th space shuttle mission and it
89
00:03:40.820 --> 00:03:42.060
has cleared the tower.
90
00:03:46.910 --> 00:03:47.470
Challenger
91
00:03:50.510 --> 00:03:52.190
good roll program confirmed.
92
00:03:53.310 --> 00:03:55.070
Challenger now heading downrange.
93
00:04:03.470 --> 00:04:06.030
Engines beginning throttling down now at
94
00:04:06.030 --> 00:04:08.590
94%. Normal throttles
95
00:04:08.750 --> 00:04:10.510
for most of the flight. 104%.
96
00:04:13.410 --> 00:04:16.210
Throttle down to 65% shortly.
97
00:04:19.890 --> 00:04:22.570
Engines at 65%. Three engines running
98
00:04:22.570 --> 00:04:24.650
normally. Three good fuel cells. Three good
99
00:04:24.650 --> 00:04:25.170
APUs.
100
00:04:28.050 --> 00:04:30.610
Velocity 2257ft per second.
101
00:04:30.610 --> 00:04:32.930
Altitude 4.3 nautical miles downrange.
102
00:04:32.930 --> 00:04:33.810
Distance 3 nautical
103
00:04:33.810 --> 00:04:36.310
miles.
104
00:04:39.580 --> 00:04:41.260
Engines throttling up. Three engines now at
105
00:04:41.260 --> 00:04:43.980
104%. Challenger go at throttle up.
106
00:04:50.540 --> 00:04:53.380
1 minute 15 seconds. Velocity 2900ft per
107
00:04:53.380 --> 00:04:55.420
second. Altitude 9 nautical miles downrange.
108
00:04:55.420 --> 00:04:56.780
Distance 7 nautical miles.
109
00:05:03.160 --> 00:05:03.400
Professor Fred Watson: It.
110
00:05:18.150 --> 00:05:18.970
M.
111
00:05:26.920 --> 00:05:28.360
Generic: Flight controllers here looking very
112
00:05:28.360 --> 00:05:29.480
carefully at the situation.
113
00:05:31.350 --> 00:05:32.950
Obviously a major malfunction.
114
00:05:38.550 --> 00:05:39.830
We have no downlink.
115
00:05:49.190 --> 00:05:51.190
We have a report from the flight dynamics
116
00:05:51.190 --> 00:05:53.710
officer that the vehicle has exploded. Flight
117
00:05:53.710 --> 00:05:55.910
director confirms that we are looking at,
118
00:05:56.810 --> 00:05:58.810
uh, checking with the recovery forces to see,
119
00:05:58.810 --> 00:06:00.190
uh, what can be done at this point.
120
00:06:01.310 --> 00:06:03.630
Andrew Dunkley: And there it is. That was the launch of
121
00:06:03.630 --> 00:06:06.590
challenger in 1986, uh,
122
00:06:06.590 --> 00:06:08.910
in real time. Uh, and
123
00:06:09.390 --> 00:06:12.030
we heard the final words of, uh, the
124
00:06:12.030 --> 00:06:14.830
commander, Dick Scobie, when he said, roger,
125
00:06:15.230 --> 00:06:18.110
going with throttle up. And that was
126
00:06:18.110 --> 00:06:20.110
basically where it all went horribly wrong.
127
00:06:20.510 --> 00:06:22.780
Fred. Uh, the, um,
128
00:06:24.110 --> 00:06:26.430
cause of the accident was ultimately
129
00:06:26.590 --> 00:06:29.430
blamed on the O rings. The O rings
130
00:06:29.430 --> 00:06:32.230
joined each section of the solid
131
00:06:32.230 --> 00:06:34.430
rocket boosters and
132
00:06:35.070 --> 00:06:36.990
there were several of them, but one of them
133
00:06:37.230 --> 00:06:40.160
had a catastrophic failure and the, um,
134
00:06:40.240 --> 00:06:43.070
uh, the vehicle exploded as a consequence of
135
00:06:43.150 --> 00:06:46.030
that failure. And we all saw it,
136
00:06:46.030 --> 00:06:47.340
we all watched, um,
137
00:06:49.190 --> 00:06:49.950
was horrifying.
138
00:06:52.160 --> 00:06:53.890
Professor Fred Watson: Uh, indeed it was. I remember it very well
139
00:06:53.890 --> 00:06:56.760
too, of course. Um, so, yeah, it was
140
00:06:56.760 --> 00:06:58.690
um, nothing to do with the throttling up.
141
00:06:58.770 --> 00:07:00.890
That was just, that was just to get it going.
142
00:07:00.890 --> 00:07:02.130
Yeah, and
143
00:07:04.050 --> 00:07:06.890
they throttle back for the, um, maximum
144
00:07:06.890 --> 00:07:09.890
dynamic pressure, uh, region. When you've
145
00:07:09.890 --> 00:07:12.090
got the biggest aerodynamic forces, you
146
00:07:12.090 --> 00:07:13.530
Throttle back for that and then throttle up
147
00:07:13.530 --> 00:07:16.210
again. Um, and so it was
148
00:07:16.210 --> 00:07:19.060
eventually determined that, uh,
149
00:07:19.100 --> 00:07:21.660
what had happened was that the temperature on
150
00:07:21.660 --> 00:07:24.340
one side of the shuttle, uh, it was a cold
151
00:07:24.340 --> 00:07:26.340
morning, it was a winter morning, 28th of
152
00:07:26.340 --> 00:07:29.260
January, 2 degrees, I think it was 2 degrees
153
00:07:29.260 --> 00:07:32.180
above zero ambient when they launched. But
154
00:07:32.180 --> 00:07:34.780
one of the one side of the
155
00:07:35.100 --> 00:07:37.780
throttle, sorry, the shuttle and its boosters
156
00:07:37.780 --> 00:07:40.740
were still at minus two. And uh, those
157
00:07:40.740 --> 00:07:43.540
temperatures, um, those O
158
00:07:43.540 --> 00:07:46.380
rings become effectively, uh, non
159
00:07:46.380 --> 00:07:49.030
pliable. They, they don't, you know, they're
160
00:07:49.030 --> 00:07:51.870
not flexible. Uh, and so that's what
161
00:07:51.870 --> 00:07:54.230
allowed the fact that it was not behaving
162
00:07:54.230 --> 00:07:56.350
properly allowed gas to escape from that
163
00:07:56.350 --> 00:07:58.910
joint as exactly as you've said. There are
164
00:07:58.910 --> 00:08:01.750
four sections to the shuttle booster, each
165
00:08:01.910 --> 00:08:04.230
sealed by O rings. And it was the lower one,
166
00:08:04.750 --> 00:08:07.350
um, where combustion was at its extreme.
167
00:08:07.750 --> 00:08:10.470
Uh, it uh, meant the gases came through. And
168
00:08:10.790 --> 00:08:13.310
in fact, uh, there is footage that shows
169
00:08:13.310 --> 00:08:15.750
exactly that, uh, with these hot gases
170
00:08:15.750 --> 00:08:18.080
playing on the main fuel tank, um,
171
00:08:19.010 --> 00:08:21.810
the external fuel tank of the shuttle. So it
172
00:08:21.810 --> 00:08:24.650
was, uh, very much their fate was
173
00:08:24.650 --> 00:08:27.250
sealed even before launch, basically. And
174
00:08:27.730 --> 00:08:29.850
there were people at the company who built
175
00:08:29.850 --> 00:08:32.050
the boosters. Morton FIRE call who knew that.
176
00:08:32.130 --> 00:08:34.530
And they were overridden in their
177
00:08:34.610 --> 00:08:36.610
warnings that this was likely to be
178
00:08:36.610 --> 00:08:37.170
dangerous.
179
00:08:37.570 --> 00:08:40.290
Andrew Dunkley: They raised concerns a long time before this
180
00:08:40.290 --> 00:08:43.050
happened. In fact, uh, they'd discovered
181
00:08:43.050 --> 00:08:45.490
damage in the O rings from previous missions.
182
00:08:46.630 --> 00:08:49.190
And even the night before
183
00:08:49.430 --> 00:08:52.230
the launch they held a meeting to say,
184
00:08:52.230 --> 00:08:54.110
we don't think you've got to scrub the
185
00:08:54.110 --> 00:08:56.310
launch. It's not safe,
186
00:08:57.270 --> 00:09:00.110
something dreadful could happen. And I
187
00:09:00.110 --> 00:09:02.990
think, uh, the factor that
188
00:09:02.990 --> 00:09:04.470
made the difference, as you said, was the
189
00:09:04.470 --> 00:09:07.350
temperature that morning. Um, because
190
00:09:08.070 --> 00:09:10.870
previous flights were warmer.
191
00:09:10.950 --> 00:09:12.230
It was warmer, Yeah.
192
00:09:12.230 --> 00:09:14.670
Professor Fred Watson: I think 12 degrees was the lowest they'd ever
193
00:09:14.670 --> 00:09:17.310
launched at. And it was two that morning, as
194
00:09:17.310 --> 00:09:19.970
you said. Um, and one of the
195
00:09:19.970 --> 00:09:22.490
reasons for the
196
00:09:22.490 --> 00:09:25.330
reluctance to scrub the mission may have
197
00:09:25.330 --> 00:09:27.730
been the fact that we did have
198
00:09:28.130 --> 00:09:30.610
this teacher, uh, on board,
199
00:09:31.570 --> 00:09:33.650
Christina McAuliffe, that's her name, I
200
00:09:33.650 --> 00:09:36.310
think. Um, she was, uh,
201
00:09:36.530 --> 00:09:39.270
a schoolteacher, not an astronaut. Uh,
202
00:09:39.270 --> 00:09:41.170
she'd engaged many, many schools
203
00:09:41.970 --> 00:09:44.530
across the country. So
204
00:09:45.110 --> 00:09:47.590
huge numbers of people were watching. And
205
00:09:47.670 --> 00:09:50.470
NASA had done that purposely, I think, to
206
00:09:50.710 --> 00:09:52.950
sort of inject some more interest into the
207
00:09:52.950 --> 00:09:54.710
shuttle program. Because they'd had 25
208
00:09:54.710 --> 00:09:57.190
successful launches and it was becoming
209
00:09:57.750 --> 00:10:00.470
basically routine. Um, you know,
210
00:10:00.629 --> 00:10:03.180
very. People were blase about it. Uh,
211
00:10:03.350 --> 00:10:06.270
but just to also confirm
212
00:10:06.270 --> 00:10:08.910
that there were a further 87 successful
213
00:10:08.910 --> 00:10:11.470
shuttle launches after that. So the problems
214
00:10:11.470 --> 00:10:13.990
were fixed and, uh, the lessons were learned.
215
00:10:14.730 --> 00:10:17.600
Um, it was a tragedy, of course,
216
00:10:17.600 --> 00:10:19.440
a human tragedy. With the loss of life.
217
00:10:19.950 --> 00:10:22.800
Uh, I noticed something yesterday that
218
00:10:22.800 --> 00:10:25.270
blew me away, Andrew. Um,
219
00:10:25.600 --> 00:10:27.840
there are 17 astronauts
220
00:10:28.320 --> 00:10:30.800
were lost, uh, in NASA
221
00:10:30.800 --> 00:10:33.130
programs. The three, um,
222
00:10:33.840 --> 00:10:36.840
Apollo 1 astronauts who died in
223
00:10:36.840 --> 00:10:39.600
the fire on the ground, uh, of the Apollo 1
224
00:10:39.900 --> 00:10:41.980
uh, capsule. That was on the
225
00:10:42.720 --> 00:10:45.104
uh, 27th of January
226
00:10:45.336 --> 00:10:48.150
1967. Yes, the uh,
227
00:10:48.620 --> 00:10:51.340
Columbia disaster, uh, when
228
00:10:51.820 --> 00:10:54.740
re. Um entry was um, basically turned
229
00:10:54.740 --> 00:10:57.420
into a uh, you know, a disintegration because
230
00:10:57.420 --> 00:11:00.380
of damage uh, to the, to the shuttle wing.
231
00:11:00.620 --> 00:11:02.300
Andrew Dunkley: That wasn't it.
232
00:11:02.940 --> 00:11:05.140
Professor Fred Watson: That's correct. That was on the 1st of
233
00:11:05.140 --> 00:11:07.420
February 2003. So these
234
00:11:08.100 --> 00:11:11.020
losses of life, we're all within a
235
00:11:11.020 --> 00:11:13.620
week of each other in anniversary times.
236
00:11:13.780 --> 00:11:16.500
It's quite amazing. So, yes, the
237
00:11:16.660 --> 00:11:19.540
Challenger disaster, uh, 59
238
00:11:19.700 --> 00:11:22.460
years before, uh, the day before we'd lost
239
00:11:22.460 --> 00:11:24.920
the Apollo 1 crew. And uh,
240
00:11:26.110 --> 00:11:28.700
um. It's a coincidence, but it's a spooky
241
00:11:28.700 --> 00:11:28.980
one.
242
00:11:29.060 --> 00:11:31.700
Andrew Dunkley: It is very spooky. I remember where I was
243
00:11:31.700 --> 00:11:34.260
when the news broke. I just got in my car
244
00:11:34.660 --> 00:11:37.640
and um, I naturally
245
00:11:37.640 --> 00:11:39.880
had the radio on being someone who worked in
246
00:11:39.880 --> 00:11:42.880
the industry. And uh, the news came on
247
00:11:42.880 --> 00:11:45.600
as I was backing the car out and I just
248
00:11:45.600 --> 00:11:48.080
stopped in my tracks and I just shook. I
249
00:11:48.080 --> 00:11:50.120
couldn't believe it. Um,
250
00:11:50.960 --> 00:11:53.720
and, and what really haunts me is that only a
251
00:11:53.720 --> 00:11:56.560
week before I'd been talking to my
252
00:11:56.560 --> 00:11:58.320
future sister in law who was still in high
253
00:11:58.320 --> 00:12:00.400
school at the time. And she brought it up
254
00:12:00.400 --> 00:12:02.580
with me about the space shuttle program. And
255
00:12:02.580 --> 00:12:05.180
I said what worries me is something
256
00:12:05.420 --> 00:12:07.580
horribly wrong is going to happen.
257
00:12:08.140 --> 00:12:10.900
Yeah, uh, I, I think, I think they're
258
00:12:10.900 --> 00:12:13.860
actually being too gung ho. Those. That's
259
00:12:13.860 --> 00:12:16.780
what I said to her. And I couldn't believe
260
00:12:16.780 --> 00:12:19.060
less. You know, about a week later this
261
00:12:19.060 --> 00:12:19.580
happened.
262
00:12:19.820 --> 00:12:21.940
Professor Fred Watson: Uh, well, you were right in, in a way that's
263
00:12:21.940 --> 00:12:23.660
sort of what, what led to it.
264
00:12:23.900 --> 00:12:25.980
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah, yeah. Uh, but the same thing,
265
00:12:26.980 --> 00:12:29.300
uh, as you mentioned with the, the loss of
266
00:12:29.300 --> 00:12:31.620
interest in the space shuttle program from
267
00:12:31.620 --> 00:12:34.240
the public perspect, uh, happened with
268
00:12:34.240 --> 00:12:36.760
Apollo like they supposed to, they were
269
00:12:36.760 --> 00:12:38.480
supposed to have more missions but they just
270
00:12:38.480 --> 00:12:40.720
went no, no one's interested anymore. So they
271
00:12:40.720 --> 00:12:43.520
stopped at 17 and. Quite
272
00:12:43.520 --> 00:12:46.480
right. And, and I, I suppose these
273
00:12:46.480 --> 00:12:49.280
days space travel has just become
274
00:12:49.280 --> 00:12:51.200
routine. There are missions going up and down
275
00:12:51.200 --> 00:12:53.880
all the time we never hear about because
276
00:12:54.440 --> 00:12:57.240
it's just it, it's so very regular
277
00:12:57.240 --> 00:12:59.400
now. And, and when you bring in the private
278
00:12:59.400 --> 00:13:01.160
sector on top of that there's launches every
279
00:13:01.160 --> 00:13:03.400
other day. It's, it's just happening.
280
00:13:04.520 --> 00:13:06.160
And was always going to go that way, I
281
00:13:06.160 --> 00:13:07.880
suppose. Uh, but
282
00:13:08.680 --> 00:13:11.600
um, you've got to spare a thought for
283
00:13:11.600 --> 00:13:14.040
the pioneers that uh, sacrificed their lives
284
00:13:14.040 --> 00:13:16.000
to make all this possible. Because without
285
00:13:16.000 --> 00:13:18.600
them it just would never have got to the
286
00:13:18.600 --> 00:13:21.440
point it is now. And I think
287
00:13:21.440 --> 00:13:23.520
we've said it before. You go back to the
288
00:13:23.520 --> 00:13:26.160
history of flight and we got to the moon in
289
00:13:26.160 --> 00:13:29.000
less than 100 years of the first flight by
290
00:13:29.000 --> 00:13:31.960
a human being in a, in a um, purpose
291
00:13:31.960 --> 00:13:34.480
built uh, aircraft. It's just
292
00:13:34.480 --> 00:13:37.360
extraordinary to think that we,
293
00:13:37.360 --> 00:13:40.160
we could have leapt so far so fast. And I
294
00:13:40.160 --> 00:13:42.000
suppose when you do that there is a price.
295
00:13:42.000 --> 00:13:44.480
And this was one of the, one of the costs
296
00:13:44.800 --> 00:13:47.680
of uh, of space travel and aeronautics and
297
00:13:48.560 --> 00:13:51.440
yeah, it was very sad day and um, one I will
298
00:13:51.440 --> 00:13:52.960
never forget. Red.
299
00:13:54.740 --> 00:13:57.500
Uh, we will leave Challenger there um,
300
00:13:57.500 --> 00:14:00.080
to some happier news and of course
301
00:14:00.480 --> 00:14:03.340
uh, the other celebrated Australia
302
00:14:03.420 --> 00:14:06.220
Day in this country. 26th of January
303
00:14:07.340 --> 00:14:10.320
and every year we uh,
304
00:14:10.540 --> 00:14:13.140
have the announcement of the Australian of
305
00:14:13.140 --> 00:14:15.420
the Year. Now quite often it's a sports star.
306
00:14:16.460 --> 00:14:19.340
That usually, usually happens. Uh, although
307
00:14:19.340 --> 00:14:21.820
in recent years they've been focusing more on
308
00:14:21.900 --> 00:14:24.460
the academic side of things or the medical
309
00:14:24.460 --> 00:14:27.380
side of things. Which is, which is good. This
310
00:14:27.380 --> 00:14:29.700
year though, uh, you must be really pleased.
311
00:14:29.700 --> 00:14:32.060
It is an Australian astronaut,
312
00:14:33.490 --> 00:14:34.230
uh, absolutely.
313
00:14:34.230 --> 00:14:36.150
Professor Fred Watson: Delighted, yeah really thrilled about that.
314
00:14:36.490 --> 00:14:39.190
Um, she's an astronaut
315
00:14:39.190 --> 00:14:41.470
who uh, has been qualified under
316
00:14:41.470 --> 00:14:44.350
ESA's Program Astronaut Program, uh, the
317
00:14:44.350 --> 00:14:46.630
European Space Agency. She hasn't flown yet.
318
00:14:47.110 --> 00:14:48.990
Uh, there's every chance that she will, that
319
00:14:48.990 --> 00:14:51.830
she will fly to the space station, uh, and
320
00:14:52.150 --> 00:14:55.070
fulfill a mission. Catherine bennelpegg
321
00:14:55.070 --> 00:14:57.510
is her name. I discovered um, yesterday,
322
00:14:58.130 --> 00:15:01.090
looking at dates yesterday obviously um, she
323
00:15:01.330 --> 00:15:04.210
is one day short of 40 years younger
324
00:15:04.210 --> 00:15:06.970
than me but her birthday is the day
325
00:15:06.970 --> 00:15:08.770
after mine. So
326
00:15:09.730 --> 00:15:12.690
that's a non coincidence. But um, not
327
00:15:12.690 --> 00:15:15.130
only an astronaut, but she is also Director
328
00:15:15.130 --> 00:15:17.290
of Space Technology at the Australian Space
329
00:15:17.290 --> 00:15:19.900
Agency which was um, very much um,
330
00:15:20.690 --> 00:15:23.250
close to my heart in the work that I did for
331
00:15:23.250 --> 00:15:25.490
the government, the Australian Space Agency,
332
00:15:25.880 --> 00:15:27.570
uh, a sister organization within the
333
00:15:27.570 --> 00:15:28.910
Department of the Industry, Science and
334
00:15:28.910 --> 00:15:31.150
Resources where I worked. So uh, a lot of
335
00:15:31.150 --> 00:15:34.140
friends there. Um, and Catherine uh,
336
00:15:34.140 --> 00:15:36.630
is uh, absolutely
337
00:15:37.030 --> 00:15:39.510
well deserved recipient of the
338
00:15:39.510 --> 00:15:41.790
annual Australian of the Year award and
339
00:15:41.790 --> 00:15:44.430
she'll do great things with it. She wants to
340
00:15:44.430 --> 00:15:46.550
be um, very much a STEM
341
00:15:46.790 --> 00:15:49.510
ambassador as well for public ed,
342
00:15:49.510 --> 00:15:51.830
for education, uh, for science, technology,
343
00:15:52.150 --> 00:15:54.070
education. She'll do a great job. She's a
344
00:15:54.070 --> 00:15:54.630
lovely person.
345
00:15:55.360 --> 00:15:58.240
Andrew Dunkley: Yes, um, she comes across that way and
346
00:15:59.680 --> 00:16:02.520
I think the interest in space science is
347
00:16:02.520 --> 00:16:05.360
starting to really uh, grow from strength
348
00:16:05.360 --> 00:16:08.320
to strength and uh, she will do
349
00:16:08.640 --> 00:16:11.119
a wonderful job in that regard and
350
00:16:11.280 --> 00:16:13.800
maybe inspire other Australians to follow in
351
00:16:13.800 --> 00:16:16.760
her footsteps. And now that we have our own
352
00:16:16.760 --> 00:16:18.880
space agency. We certainly want that, don't
353
00:16:18.880 --> 00:16:19.120
we?
354
00:16:20.000 --> 00:16:22.120
Professor Fred Watson: Very much so, yes. The Australian Space
355
00:16:22.120 --> 00:16:24.480
Agency was formed in 2018.
356
00:16:24.720 --> 00:16:27.580
It's um, still going strong.
357
00:16:27.660 --> 00:16:30.500
A lot of its, uh, functions are regulatory.
358
00:16:30.500 --> 00:16:32.420
It's all about regulating launches and things
359
00:16:32.420 --> 00:16:35.220
of that sort, um, but also promoting
360
00:16:35.220 --> 00:16:38.140
startups and things of that sort to encourage
361
00:16:38.140 --> 00:16:40.300
the space industry here in Australia, which
362
00:16:40.300 --> 00:16:42.140
was why it was set up in the first place.
363
00:16:42.300 --> 00:16:42.779
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah.
364
00:16:42.779 --> 00:16:44.820
Professor Fred Watson: Catherine. Catherine's a great, you know, a
365
00:16:44.820 --> 00:16:46.700
great cheerleader for that. It's brilliant.
366
00:16:46.700 --> 00:16:48.580
Andrew Dunkley: She's got a busy year ahead of her now
367
00:16:48.580 --> 00:16:51.580
because her Australian of the Year duties
368
00:16:51.580 --> 00:16:53.900
will be on top of what she has to do for her
369
00:16:53.900 --> 00:16:56.860
regular gig. So she'll be doing a lot more
370
00:16:56.860 --> 00:16:58.530
travel, a lot more speaking, a lot more
371
00:16:58.680 --> 00:17:01.040
engagements. Uh, it, it's a big job when
372
00:17:01.040 --> 00:17:03.440
you're named Australian of the Year, so I'm
373
00:17:03.440 --> 00:17:03.720
told.
374
00:17:05.720 --> 00:17:08.120
Professor Fred Watson: Well, you never know. Andrew. One day. One
375
00:17:08.120 --> 00:17:09.320
day. Ah.
376
00:17:09.390 --> 00:17:12.240
Andrew Dunkley: Uh, look, I'd be, I'd be lucky to
377
00:17:12.240 --> 00:17:15.120
be named, you know, my street Member of
378
00:17:15.120 --> 00:17:18.040
the year. Not a
379
00:17:18.040 --> 00:17:20.960
big street either, but uh, no, good luck
380
00:17:20.960 --> 00:17:23.120
to her. And uh, congratulations to Catherine
381
00:17:23.120 --> 00:17:25.720
Bennell Pegg. This is Space
382
00:17:25.720 --> 00:17:28.280
Nuts with Andrew Dunkley and Professor
383
00:17:28.280 --> 00:17:28.760
Fred.
384
00:17:32.020 --> 00:17:34.020
Generic: Okay, we've had a problem here. This is
385
00:17:34.020 --> 00:17:35.140
Houston. Say again please.
386
00:17:35.620 --> 00:17:36.660
Andrew Dunkley: Houston, we've had a problem.
387
00:17:36.660 --> 00:17:39.020
Generic: We've had a main D bus. Roger made the
388
00:17:39.020 --> 00:17:41.220
interval. Okay, standby 13. We're looking at
389
00:17:41.220 --> 00:17:41.460
it.
390
00:17:42.980 --> 00:17:44.420
Andrew Dunkley: Do you like that, Fred? We've got some new
391
00:17:44.420 --> 00:17:47.380
links. I had a bit of time up my sleeve so
392
00:17:47.380 --> 00:17:48.700
I um, created some.
393
00:17:48.700 --> 00:17:51.340
Professor Fred Watson: New stuff that's a very appropriate one as
394
00:17:51.340 --> 00:17:51.620
well.
395
00:17:51.620 --> 00:17:53.780
Andrew Dunkley: Yes, I thought so too. Yeah.
396
00:17:53.780 --> 00:17:56.340
Uh, now our next story is
397
00:17:56.580 --> 00:17:59.390
about defining what is a moon.
398
00:17:59.470 --> 00:18:01.150
This has come about after
399
00:18:02.350 --> 00:18:04.990
a study been published, um, which
400
00:18:05.710 --> 00:18:08.710
is a, um, peer reviewed paper
401
00:18:08.710 --> 00:18:10.480
in the archive. Um,
402
00:18:11.790 --> 00:18:14.790
it's looking at a really big gas giant, but
403
00:18:14.790 --> 00:18:17.710
they think it's got a moon that could force
404
00:18:17.710 --> 00:18:19.710
us to redefine what a moon is.
405
00:18:20.510 --> 00:18:21.710
Is that the way it goes?
406
00:18:22.030 --> 00:18:24.790
Professor Fred Watson: Well, yeah, because it's big. That's
407
00:18:24.790 --> 00:18:25.070
right.
408
00:18:25.070 --> 00:18:26.190
Andrew Dunkley: I got that impression.
409
00:18:27.030 --> 00:18:29.830
Professor Fred Watson: Yeah. So, um, this is
410
00:18:30.080 --> 00:18:32.790
uh, work, uh, that's been done,
411
00:18:33.150 --> 00:18:35.390
uh, uh, actually led from the University of
412
00:18:35.390 --> 00:18:38.390
Cambridge using uh, a uh, thing called
413
00:18:38.390 --> 00:18:40.910
an interferometer, which is one of these
414
00:18:40.910 --> 00:18:43.350
things that brings light waves together and
415
00:18:43.430 --> 00:18:46.420
watches them cancel out. And by, um,
416
00:18:46.630 --> 00:18:49.350
doing that carefully enough, you can uh,
417
00:18:49.350 --> 00:18:51.110
learn a lot more than you otherwise could.
418
00:18:51.450 --> 00:18:53.660
Uh, and there is an interferometer which is
419
00:18:53.660 --> 00:18:56.260
called gravity. Uh, good name for it because,
420
00:18:56.510 --> 00:18:58.750
uh, that's one of its tasks was to um,
421
00:18:59.700 --> 00:19:01.670
kind of look at the. Look at the um,
422
00:19:01.780 --> 00:19:03.740
gravitational forces around black holes,
423
00:19:03.740 --> 00:19:05.780
which is done very successfully around the
424
00:19:05.780 --> 00:19:07.540
black hole at the center of our galaxy. It's
425
00:19:07.540 --> 00:19:09.740
on the Very Large Telescope in Chile. And
426
00:19:09.740 --> 00:19:12.740
it's a way of, you will know and some
427
00:19:12.740 --> 00:19:14.460
of your listeners, sorry, some of our
428
00:19:14.460 --> 00:19:16.860
listeners will remember, uh, that the Very
429
00:19:16.860 --> 00:19:19.860
Large telescope is actually 4 8.2 meter
430
00:19:20.080 --> 00:19:22.320
uh, telescopes which can be used together,
431
00:19:22.760 --> 00:19:25.480
uh, along with um, some auxiliary telescopes
432
00:19:25.480 --> 00:19:28.480
as well. And that's uh, they're used together
433
00:19:29.040 --> 00:19:31.160
in the science of
434
00:19:31.160 --> 00:19:33.810
interferometry, which lets you uh,
435
00:19:33.840 --> 00:19:36.720
look at um, objects in space
436
00:19:36.800 --> 00:19:39.520
in very great detail. And in particular,
437
00:19:40.280 --> 00:19:42.480
uh, the scientists have been watching the
438
00:19:42.480 --> 00:19:45.170
orbit of a gas giant, uh,
439
00:19:46.080 --> 00:19:48.700
uh, exoplanet, which
440
00:19:49.020 --> 00:19:50.700
has the Lovely name of HD
441
00:19:50.700 --> 00:19:53.060
206893B. It's
442
00:19:53.060 --> 00:19:56.060
133 light years from our uh, solar system
443
00:19:56.060 --> 00:19:58.820
as the crow flies. Um, but what they've done
444
00:19:58.820 --> 00:20:01.820
is they've watched the motion of this gas
445
00:20:01.820 --> 00:20:04.620
giant, uh, uh, as it
446
00:20:04.660 --> 00:20:06.900
uh, orbits around its parent star, which is
447
00:20:06.900 --> 00:20:09.860
HD 206893 itself. The
448
00:20:09.860 --> 00:20:12.220
B refers at the end of that refers to the gas
449
00:20:12.220 --> 00:20:15.070
giant planet itself. But what they've seen is
450
00:20:15.070 --> 00:20:17.830
that the orbit of this giant planet
451
00:20:17.990 --> 00:20:20.790
is wobbling slightly as it goes around
452
00:20:21.830 --> 00:20:24.790
little, um, you know, deviations, uh, from
453
00:20:24.790 --> 00:20:27.030
a perfect ellipse which are
454
00:20:27.030 --> 00:20:29.670
interpreted uh, as being due
455
00:20:29.990 --> 00:20:32.710
to a moon. And
456
00:20:32.950 --> 00:20:35.870
by knowing the, knowing the mass of
457
00:20:35.870 --> 00:20:38.230
the, or estimating the mass of the planet
458
00:20:38.230 --> 00:20:41.110
itself, um, you can estimate the
459
00:20:41.110 --> 00:20:43.870
mass of this moon and it's, it's
460
00:20:43.870 --> 00:20:46.550
enormous. Uh, it's um, many
461
00:20:46.930 --> 00:20:49.490
times the mass. If, uh, I remember rightly,
462
00:20:49.600 --> 00:20:51.850
uh, something like nine times the mass of
463
00:20:51.850 --> 00:20:54.490
Neptune, 40% of the mass of
464
00:20:54.490 --> 00:20:57.450
Jupiter. Uh, and you
465
00:20:57.450 --> 00:20:59.090
know, when you compare that with the moons in
466
00:20:59.090 --> 00:21:01.930
our solar system, it's much, much heavier
467
00:21:01.930 --> 00:21:04.810
than anything or much, much more massive
468
00:21:04.810 --> 00:21:07.410
than anything we've got. Uh, so
469
00:21:07.810 --> 00:21:10.690
that leads to the question, well,
470
00:21:10.770 --> 00:21:12.610
you know, if you've got something that's nine
471
00:21:12.610 --> 00:21:14.690
times the mass of Neptune, could you ever
472
00:21:14.690 --> 00:21:17.370
call it a moon? Uh, but the normal definition
473
00:21:17.370 --> 00:21:19.870
of a moon or satellite is
474
00:21:20.030 --> 00:21:22.830
something that is in orbit around an object
475
00:21:22.830 --> 00:21:25.350
that is in orbit around a star. In other
476
00:21:25.350 --> 00:21:28.110
words, a planet. Um, so do we want to
477
00:21:28.110 --> 00:21:30.670
bend that definition or are we just content
478
00:21:30.750 --> 00:21:33.550
for this thing to be the most massive moon
479
00:21:33.550 --> 00:21:33.870
known?
480
00:21:34.750 --> 00:21:36.190
Andrew Dunkley: Well, where do you draw the line?
481
00:21:37.950 --> 00:21:40.310
You know, if the definition is a satellite
482
00:21:40.310 --> 00:21:43.070
orbiting at a, an object orbiting a
483
00:21:43.070 --> 00:21:45.760
star, then that's. It shouldn't matter how
484
00:21:45.760 --> 00:21:46.680
big it is, should it?
485
00:21:48.130 --> 00:21:50.360
Professor Fred Watson: Uh, no, that's right, that would be my view,
486
00:21:50.450 --> 00:21:53.280
uh, that um, you
487
00:21:53.280 --> 00:21:56.050
keep the Basically keep the definition, uh,
488
00:21:56.680 --> 00:21:59.640
as it stands, uh, what you do is you just
489
00:21:59.720 --> 00:22:02.620
extend your range of uh,
490
00:22:04.040 --> 00:22:06.680
expectancy in terms of
491
00:22:07.310 --> 00:22:09.920
uh, the size of these objects. Um,
492
00:22:10.740 --> 00:22:13.540
there's a, in fact there's a lovely comment.
493
00:22:13.540 --> 00:22:14.980
There's several comments from the lead
494
00:22:14.980 --> 00:22:17.300
author. Uh, I'm looking just to say where
495
00:22:17.300 --> 00:22:18.940
we're looking. We're looking at Daily Galaxy
496
00:22:18.940 --> 00:22:21.340
for this report, but it's a paper, uh, that's
497
00:22:21.340 --> 00:22:23.020
been published I uh, think in Monthly
498
00:22:23.020 --> 00:22:25.300
Notices, again, uh, one of the leading
499
00:22:25.300 --> 00:22:27.780
journals anyway, um, and
500
00:22:28.340 --> 00:22:30.780
the uh, you know, the, the
501
00:22:30.780 --> 00:22:33.380
quotation from Quentin Crowell, who's one of
502
00:22:33.380 --> 00:22:36.110
the authors, I think the lead author of this
503
00:22:36.110 --> 00:22:38.870
paper. Um, uh, some
504
00:22:38.870 --> 00:22:40.790
nice quotes. What we found is that
505
00:22:40.790 --> 00:22:43.590
HD20683B doesn't just
506
00:22:43.590 --> 00:22:46.070
follow a smooth orbit around its star. On top
507
00:22:46.070 --> 00:22:47.830
of that motion, it shows a small but
508
00:22:47.830 --> 00:22:50.430
measurable back and forth wobble. Wobble has
509
00:22:50.430 --> 00:22:53.270
a period of nine months and a size comparable
510
00:22:53.270 --> 00:22:55.750
to the Earth Moon distance. This kind of
511
00:22:55.750 --> 00:22:57.670
signal is exactly what you'd expect if the
512
00:22:57.670 --> 00:22:59.550
object were being tugged by an unseen
513
00:22:59.550 --> 00:23:02.350
companion such as a large moon, making this
514
00:23:02.350 --> 00:23:04.830
system a particularly intriguing
515
00:23:04.830 --> 00:23:07.020
candidate for hosting an
516
00:23:07.020 --> 00:23:09.820
exomoon. Um, and goes on
517
00:23:09.820 --> 00:23:12.300
to say um, uh,
518
00:23:13.180 --> 00:23:15.540
uh, this raises the question because of the
519
00:23:15.540 --> 00:23:17.460
mass of this moon, this naturally raises the
520
00:23:17.460 --> 00:23:19.180
question of whether such an object should
521
00:23:19.180 --> 00:23:21.700
even be called a moon. These masses, the
522
00:23:21.700 --> 00:23:24.060
distinction between a massive moon and a very
523
00:23:24.060 --> 00:23:26.940
low mass companion becomes blurred.
524
00:23:27.340 --> 00:23:29.780
However, there is currently no definition of
525
00:23:29.780 --> 00:23:32.420
an exomoon and in practice astronomers
526
00:23:32.420 --> 00:23:35.180
generally for generally refer to any object
527
00:23:35.180 --> 00:23:38.180
orbiting a planet or substellar companion
528
00:23:38.420 --> 00:23:41.140
as a moon. So that's the bottom line.
529
00:23:41.920 --> 00:23:44.220
Um, uh, there are not many known and that's
530
00:23:44.220 --> 00:23:46.980
because moons naturally are generally small
531
00:23:47.220 --> 00:23:50.140
and so their effect on their, on
532
00:23:50.140 --> 00:23:52.820
the planet around which they're orbiting is
533
00:23:53.140 --> 00:23:55.860
too small to uh, discover.
534
00:23:56.260 --> 00:23:59.140
Whereas uh, this thing is so big that its
535
00:23:59.140 --> 00:24:01.640
signal is really quite, uh,
536
00:24:01.640 --> 00:24:04.360
quite impressive. It's uh,
537
00:24:04.360 --> 00:24:06.750
sufficient for this team to
538
00:24:07.230 --> 00:24:09.710
give us the paper that we're talking about.
539
00:24:09.950 --> 00:24:12.220
Just one final quote, uh, from Kral. Uh,
540
00:24:12.990 --> 00:24:15.110
it's important to keep in mind that we're
541
00:24:15.110 --> 00:24:17.310
likely only seeing the tip of the iceberg,
542
00:24:17.470 --> 00:24:19.830
just as the first exoplanets discovered were
543
00:24:19.830 --> 00:24:21.990
the most massive ones orbiting very close to
544
00:24:21.990 --> 00:24:23.990
their stars simply because they were the
545
00:24:23.990 --> 00:24:26.630
easiest to detect. The first exomoons we
546
00:24:26.630 --> 00:24:29.390
identify are expected to be the most massive
547
00:24:29.390 --> 00:24:31.430
and extreme examples. It's a really good
548
00:24:31.430 --> 00:24:31.750
point.
549
00:24:31.830 --> 00:24:34.310
Andrew Dunkley: And there it is. And, and yet again we
550
00:24:34.470 --> 00:24:37.430
find in a potential new discovery
551
00:24:37.510 --> 00:24:40.310
that it's not what
552
00:24:40.310 --> 00:24:43.110
we would expect to be the norm. This, this is
553
00:24:43.830 --> 00:24:46.629
Another thing that we may not have
554
00:24:46.629 --> 00:24:47.430
anticipated.
555
00:24:48.560 --> 00:24:51.350
Professor Fred Watson: Uh, that's. That's right. Um, so.
556
00:24:51.830 --> 00:24:54.710
Yes. So, I mean, the point is well made.
557
00:24:54.950 --> 00:24:57.930
Quentin's point is well made that the, uh,
558
00:24:58.310 --> 00:25:00.970
the. The. That you're going to find the.
559
00:25:01.370 --> 00:25:03.650
The real outliers first because they're the
560
00:25:03.650 --> 00:25:06.600
easiest ones to find. Uh, but at, uh,
561
00:25:06.690 --> 00:25:09.140
the same time, what you've said is true. Uh,
562
00:25:09.140 --> 00:25:11.810
the outliers are sometimes so surprising that
563
00:25:11.810 --> 00:25:14.210
they're difficult to believe. Uh, but we've
564
00:25:14.210 --> 00:25:16.250
got a, um. Yeah, we've got an outlier here
565
00:25:16.250 --> 00:25:18.770
that might well be the first of a new breed
566
00:25:18.770 --> 00:25:21.490
of, uh. Or a whole new regime of
567
00:25:21.490 --> 00:25:23.130
exomoon discoveries.
568
00:25:23.290 --> 00:25:26.090
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah, I didn't even think about exomoons.
569
00:25:26.090 --> 00:25:28.620
Like, we've discovered so many exoplanets
570
00:25:28.620 --> 00:25:31.540
now, and we continue to do so, but we haven't
571
00:25:31.540 --> 00:25:34.380
actually laid our eyes on an exomoon yet.
572
00:25:35.820 --> 00:25:37.860
Professor Fred Watson: No. Um, and m. In fact, we've not laid our
573
00:25:37.860 --> 00:25:39.860
eyes on most of the exoplanets. We've
574
00:25:39.860 --> 00:25:42.580
inferred their presence, uh, by indirect
575
00:25:42.580 --> 00:25:45.340
means. There are one or two, uh, that we can
576
00:25:45.340 --> 00:25:47.780
observe directly. Uh, but when you think,
577
00:25:47.780 --> 00:25:49.460
yes, moons are always going to be smaller
578
00:25:49.460 --> 00:25:51.740
than their parent planets, um,
579
00:25:52.310 --> 00:25:54.680
that means that, uh,
580
00:25:56.070 --> 00:25:58.550
we're still pushing the limits of what is
581
00:25:58.550 --> 00:26:00.550
technically possible to detect.
582
00:26:01.270 --> 00:26:04.150
Andrew Dunkley: Could we maybe redefine this discovery
583
00:26:04.150 --> 00:26:05.990
as, uh, like a dual planet?
584
00:26:07.749 --> 00:26:09.990
Professor Fred Watson: So there is a definition of a dual planet,
585
00:26:10.160 --> 00:26:12.790
um, what we call a binary planet,
586
00:26:13.260 --> 00:26:15.270
uh, which is, uh. If you have
587
00:26:15.990 --> 00:26:18.230
two objects, one orbiting the other,
588
00:26:18.880 --> 00:26:21.080
if their center of gravity, or what we call
589
00:26:21.080 --> 00:26:24.080
the barycenter, is outside the body of either
590
00:26:24.080 --> 00:26:26.800
of them, then it's a binary planet
591
00:26:26.800 --> 00:26:28.720
rather than a planet and a moon.
592
00:26:29.450 --> 00:26:31.840
Uh, and in fact,
593
00:26:32.190 --> 00:26:35.080
uh, Jupiter, sorry, Pluto and
594
00:26:35.080 --> 00:26:38.000
its moon Charon fit that bill. Pluto, of
595
00:26:38.000 --> 00:26:40.040
course, is a dwarf planet, but Pluto and
596
00:26:40.040 --> 00:26:42.680
Charon are probably a binary dwarf planet for
597
00:26:42.680 --> 00:26:43.200
that reason.
598
00:26:43.600 --> 00:26:44.950
Andrew Dunkley: Okay. Interesting.
599
00:26:44.950 --> 00:26:45.510
Professor Fred Watson: Yeah.
600
00:26:45.990 --> 00:26:48.710
Andrew Dunkley: So, um, there'll be more work
601
00:26:49.430 --> 00:26:52.310
to find out exactly what the situation
602
00:26:52.390 --> 00:26:55.070
is here, because it's only suspicion at the
603
00:26:55.070 --> 00:26:55.750
moment, isn't it?
604
00:26:56.630 --> 00:26:58.870
Professor Fred Watson: That's right. There will be more observations
605
00:26:59.270 --> 00:27:01.780
to confirm that, uh, uh,
606
00:27:02.630 --> 00:27:04.990
the planet itself behaves in a way that is
607
00:27:04.990 --> 00:27:06.870
consistent with this large
608
00:27:07.750 --> 00:27:10.670
hypothesized moon. We haven't seen it
609
00:27:10.670 --> 00:27:12.070
yet. In fact, we haven't seen the planet
610
00:27:12.070 --> 00:27:15.030
either. But, uh, we can deduce
611
00:27:15.030 --> 00:27:17.050
things from, uh, know, from the way the
612
00:27:17.050 --> 00:27:17.890
orbits behave.
613
00:27:18.130 --> 00:27:20.210
Andrew Dunkley: Yes, indeed. If you'd like to read about
614
00:27:20.210 --> 00:27:22.370
that, the, uh, study's been published on the
615
00:27:22.370 --> 00:27:24.570
archive, and it has been accepted for
616
00:27:24.570 --> 00:27:27.330
publication in Astronomy and Astrophysics.
617
00:27:27.730 --> 00:27:29.570
You can also read about it on the
618
00:27:29.570 --> 00:27:32.210
dailygalaxy.com uh, website.
619
00:27:32.530 --> 00:27:35.450
This is Space Nuts with Andrew Dunkley and
620
00:27:35.450 --> 00:27:37.090
Professor Fred Watson.
621
00:27:41.330 --> 00:27:44.250
Generic: Tranquility Base here. The Eagle has landed.
622
00:27:44.250 --> 00:27:45.250
Professor Fred Watson: Space nets.
623
00:27:45.890 --> 00:27:48.770
Andrew Dunkley: Speaking of, um, big planets with big
624
00:27:48.770 --> 00:27:51.490
moons, what about big black holes,
625
00:27:51.730 --> 00:27:54.450
uh, and the fact that they get big fast. We
626
00:27:54.450 --> 00:27:56.610
have always been mystified by this
627
00:27:56.850 --> 00:27:59.730
phenomenon. Uh, uh, have they
628
00:27:59.730 --> 00:28:00.690
solved it, Fred?
629
00:28:01.730 --> 00:28:03.930
Professor Fred Watson: Uh, certainly some work that looks as though
630
00:28:03.930 --> 00:28:05.530
it's pointing in the right direction. Yeah,
631
00:28:05.530 --> 00:28:08.010
this comes about really. And it's uh, an
632
00:28:08.010 --> 00:28:10.970
issue that has uh, only arisen in the era of
633
00:28:10.970 --> 00:28:13.190
the James Webb Space Telescope when, uh,
634
00:28:13.190 --> 00:28:15.910
which has detected um,
635
00:28:15.930 --> 00:28:18.530
the evidence for supermassive black
636
00:28:18.530 --> 00:28:21.390
holes very, very early in the universe. Uh,
637
00:28:21.390 --> 00:28:23.330
until the Webb came along, we all thought
638
00:28:23.330 --> 00:28:26.250
that supermassive black holes evolved
639
00:28:26.250 --> 00:28:28.570
over timescales comparable with the age of
640
00:28:28.570 --> 00:28:30.290
the universe, that you started off with small
641
00:28:30.290 --> 00:28:33.130
black holes. And as time went on, you
642
00:28:33.130 --> 00:28:35.810
know, billions of years passing until we get
643
00:28:35.810 --> 00:28:38.610
to the universe's current age of 13.8 billion
644
00:28:38.610 --> 00:28:41.400
years, uh, that they gradually grew
645
00:28:41.400 --> 00:28:44.320
bigger to form the supermassive black holes
646
00:28:44.320 --> 00:28:46.240
that we see in today's universe. But when you
647
00:28:46.240 --> 00:28:48.560
look further back, further out into space, as
648
00:28:48.560 --> 00:28:50.360
the Webb has done, you're looking further
649
00:28:50.360 --> 00:28:52.240
back in time. We're now seeing within a few
650
00:28:52.240 --> 00:28:54.640
hundred million years of the Big Bang itself.
651
00:28:54.640 --> 00:28:57.080
And we find these supermassive black holes
652
00:28:57.320 --> 00:29:00.000
already there. Um, and that's the
653
00:29:00.000 --> 00:29:01.840
puzzle. That's the conundrum. How did they
654
00:29:01.840 --> 00:29:03.960
get so big so rapidly?
655
00:29:04.680 --> 00:29:06.050
And the.
656
00:29:06.530 --> 00:29:09.010
Andrew Dunkley: So, so they, they went to McDonald's. That's
657
00:29:09.010 --> 00:29:09.490
what they did.
658
00:29:12.110 --> 00:29:14.690
Professor Fred Watson: Uh, the McDonald's of the early universe.
659
00:29:14.690 --> 00:29:16.890
Yes. There must be a, must be a name for
660
00:29:16.890 --> 00:29:17.170
that.
661
00:29:17.350 --> 00:29:17.530
Generic: Um.
662
00:29:19.250 --> 00:29:21.570
Professor Fred Watson: Fast food. That's what it's not. It's fast
663
00:29:21.570 --> 00:29:23.890
food. Yeah, I was going to work on drive
664
00:29:23.890 --> 00:29:25.810
through somehow, but that doesn't scan quite
665
00:29:25.810 --> 00:29:28.770
the same way as fast food does. It is
666
00:29:28.770 --> 00:29:31.290
fast food. That's exactly. In fact, that sums
667
00:29:31.290 --> 00:29:33.930
up the, the research paper by this team of
668
00:29:33.930 --> 00:29:35.810
scientists who are actually based in Ireland,
669
00:29:37.470 --> 00:29:40.350
uh, sums up their work very, very succinctly.
670
00:29:40.590 --> 00:29:43.070
So the issue is, uh, that
671
00:29:43.590 --> 00:29:46.550
uh, as we, as the, you know, so
672
00:29:46.550 --> 00:29:49.510
what we've got is this observations, set
673
00:29:49.510 --> 00:29:52.110
of observations tells us that black holes
674
00:29:52.190 --> 00:29:55.070
got supermassive very quickly. And
675
00:29:55.470 --> 00:29:58.150
that's a puzzle for the theoretical
676
00:29:58.150 --> 00:30:01.070
astronomers who work out how
677
00:30:01.310 --> 00:30:04.030
galaxies work, how galaxies form, how black
678
00:30:04.030 --> 00:30:06.670
holes form, uh, and all of that
679
00:30:06.830 --> 00:30:09.590
great stuff in the early universe. And
680
00:30:09.830 --> 00:30:12.630
what um, has been the point
681
00:30:12.790 --> 00:30:15.790
that they've struggled with is that if
682
00:30:15.790 --> 00:30:18.310
a black hole starts eating
683
00:30:19.750 --> 00:30:22.190
the surrounding material, which is how they
684
00:30:22.190 --> 00:30:24.950
grow the gas and Dust that surrounds them.
685
00:30:25.029 --> 00:30:27.830
If they start eating that too quickly,
686
00:30:28.150 --> 00:30:30.630
in other words, quickly enough to grow into a
687
00:30:30.630 --> 00:30:32.990
supermassive black hole very quickly. What
688
00:30:32.990 --> 00:30:35.590
happens is um, the radiation
689
00:30:35.670 --> 00:30:38.630
generated by this swirling mass of stuff
690
00:30:38.870 --> 00:30:41.690
getting sucked in actually stops
691
00:30:41.930 --> 00:30:44.810
the process. It quenches the process
692
00:30:44.810 --> 00:30:47.530
of uh, accretion and the black
693
00:30:47.530 --> 00:30:50.410
holes growing. That's the way the
694
00:30:50.410 --> 00:30:53.370
theory has uh, appeared so far.
695
00:30:53.930 --> 00:30:56.730
But what the Irish astronomers have done
696
00:30:57.210 --> 00:30:59.530
is um, they've
697
00:30:59.690 --> 00:31:02.650
looked at the sort of general
698
00:31:02.810 --> 00:31:05.530
turbulence of the gas in the
699
00:31:05.530 --> 00:31:08.480
early universe, uh, as a background
700
00:31:08.720 --> 00:31:10.320
to the
701
00:31:11.440 --> 00:31:14.200
feeding black hole. And it turns
702
00:31:14.200 --> 00:31:17.200
out that if the universe
703
00:31:17.280 --> 00:31:20.160
is um, a lot more
704
00:31:20.650 --> 00:31:23.400
uh, chaotic, turbulent, very
705
00:31:23.400 --> 00:31:26.080
violent motions in the background gas, if
706
00:31:26.080 --> 00:31:28.920
you've got a black hole in an
707
00:31:28.920 --> 00:31:31.680
environment like that, um, it
708
00:31:31.680 --> 00:31:34.160
turns out that they can actually uh,
709
00:31:34.520 --> 00:31:37.400
absorb huge amounts of gas and
710
00:31:37.400 --> 00:31:40.200
so they can grow much faster than we
711
00:31:40.200 --> 00:31:43.200
originally thought. Uh, so, um, one
712
00:31:43.200 --> 00:31:46.040
of the authors, uh, of this paper,
713
00:31:46.470 --> 00:31:49.399
uh, there's a quote here, um, this is
714
00:31:49.399 --> 00:31:51.320
scitech Daily that uh, is carrying this
715
00:31:51.320 --> 00:31:54.200
story. But uh, the, the research is in one of
716
00:31:54.200 --> 00:31:55.600
the research papers, this is one of the
717
00:31:55.600 --> 00:31:58.120
authors saying we found that the chaotic
718
00:31:58.120 --> 00:32:01.040
conditions that existed in the early universe
719
00:32:01.040 --> 00:32:03.800
triggered early smaller black holes
720
00:32:03.800 --> 00:32:05.900
to grow into the supermarket. Massive black
721
00:32:05.900 --> 00:32:08.580
holes we see later. Following a feeding
722
00:32:08.580 --> 00:32:11.580
frenzy which devoured all the material
723
00:32:11.580 --> 00:32:14.380
around them, we revealed using state of the
724
00:32:14.380 --> 00:32:16.700
art computer simulations that the first
725
00:32:16.700 --> 00:32:18.980
generation of black holes, those born just a
726
00:32:18.980 --> 00:32:20.820
few hundred million years after the Big Bang,
727
00:32:20.980 --> 00:32:23.860
grew incredibly fast into tens
728
00:32:23.860 --> 00:32:26.580
of thousands of times the size of our Sun.
729
00:32:27.260 --> 00:32:28.660
Uh, and another comment,
730
00:32:30.160 --> 00:32:32.100
uh, from one of the other team members. This
731
00:32:32.100 --> 00:32:34.340
breakthrough unlocks one of astronomy's big
732
00:32:34.340 --> 00:32:37.210
puzzles, that being how black holes born in
733
00:32:37.360 --> 00:32:39.320
early universe are observed by the James Webb
734
00:32:39.320 --> 00:32:42.080
Space Telescope, uh, as observed by the James
735
00:32:42.080 --> 00:32:44.800
Webb Space Telescope, managed to reach such
736
00:32:45.040 --> 00:32:47.960
supermassive sizes so quickly. So
737
00:32:47.960 --> 00:32:49.600
maybe that's the answer to the puzzle,
738
00:32:49.600 --> 00:32:50.160
Andrew.
739
00:32:50.320 --> 00:32:52.560
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah, they ate too much too fast.
740
00:32:54.160 --> 00:32:55.600
Professor Fred Watson: That's right. Fast food.
741
00:32:56.240 --> 00:32:58.280
Andrew Dunkley: And then they get indigestion and then they
742
00:32:58.280 --> 00:32:59.760
have those, you know.
743
00:32:59.760 --> 00:33:01.520
Professor Fred Watson: Well, I think that was the problem before,
744
00:33:01.760 --> 00:33:04.280
uh, that you know, they got indigestion and
745
00:33:04.280 --> 00:33:07.120
so they stopped the process. But what these,
746
00:33:07.410 --> 00:33:09.810
these authors are saying is that if you put
747
00:33:09.810 --> 00:33:12.250
them in a really turbulent um,
748
00:33:12.930 --> 00:33:15.930
you know, field of gas, which
749
00:33:15.930 --> 00:33:18.210
we think was in the early universe, then
750
00:33:18.290 --> 00:33:21.050
things change. They don't get indigestion,
751
00:33:21.050 --> 00:33:22.290
they just go for it.
752
00:33:22.370 --> 00:33:25.090
Andrew Dunkley: They just eat and eat. They don't, don't
753
00:33:25.090 --> 00:33:26.130
notice that they're full.
754
00:33:27.090 --> 00:33:27.810
Professor Fred Watson: That's right.
755
00:33:27.810 --> 00:33:29.570
Andrew Dunkley: And keep eating like a goldfish.
756
00:33:29.730 --> 00:33:30.290
Professor Fred Watson: That's.
757
00:33:30.290 --> 00:33:32.490
Andrew Dunkley: Goldfish have that problem. That's what they
758
00:33:32.490 --> 00:33:34.210
say. Um, that's why they're so blobby
759
00:33:34.210 --> 00:33:34.490
looking.
760
00:33:34.730 --> 00:33:36.410
Professor Fred Watson: No, they don't want to stop eating.
761
00:33:36.490 --> 00:33:37.530
Andrew Dunkley: No, they don't. No.
762
00:33:37.770 --> 00:33:39.890
Professor Fred Watson: Apparently because they can't remember when
763
00:33:39.890 --> 00:33:40.650
they started eating.
764
00:33:42.810 --> 00:33:45.490
Andrew Dunkley: I don't believe that theory that goldfish
765
00:33:45.490 --> 00:33:47.210
only have a three minute memory because I
766
00:33:47.210 --> 00:33:50.010
used to keep goldfish and they knew who
767
00:33:50.010 --> 00:33:52.530
fed them because they always reacted when you
768
00:33:52.530 --> 00:33:55.330
went near the tank. Uh, the time to be. Time
769
00:33:55.330 --> 00:33:57.450
for food. Time for food. They're like dogs,
770
00:33:57.690 --> 00:34:00.240
except you can't take them for a walk. They
771
00:34:00.240 --> 00:34:01.080
tend to buy.
772
00:34:01.080 --> 00:34:01.720
Professor Fred Watson: Not yet.
773
00:34:04.200 --> 00:34:06.920
Got to take their bowl with them as well. If
774
00:34:06.920 --> 00:34:08.320
you try. Exactly.
775
00:34:08.320 --> 00:34:09.720
Andrew Dunkley: You put them in a dog bowl.
776
00:34:10.040 --> 00:34:10.920
Professor Fred Watson: Fill it with water.
777
00:34:11.160 --> 00:34:13.920
Andrew Dunkley: No, uh, let's not go there. Uh, but that's a
778
00:34:13.920 --> 00:34:16.560
fascinating story and, uh, another one that
779
00:34:16.560 --> 00:34:19.190
will probably be subject to future analysis.
780
00:34:19.190 --> 00:34:20.560
Uh, I imagine.
781
00:34:20.560 --> 00:34:21.800
Professor Fred Watson: Yep, that's right.
782
00:34:21.960 --> 00:34:23.840
Andrew Dunkley: If you'd like to read about it, as Fred said,
783
00:34:23.840 --> 00:34:26.400
it's in scitechdaily.com or you can read the
784
00:34:26.400 --> 00:34:28.600
entire paper, start to finish, if you're
785
00:34:28.600 --> 00:34:31.030
having trouble falling asleep. And that's in
786
00:34:31.030 --> 00:34:34.030
nature astronomy. Oh, dear. Um,
787
00:34:34.230 --> 00:34:36.070
we're just about done, Fred. Thank you very
788
00:34:36.070 --> 00:34:36.390
much.
789
00:34:36.790 --> 00:34:39.110
Professor Fred Watson: Oh, a pleasure, Andrew. Always good to talk.
790
00:34:39.190 --> 00:34:41.190
And, um, we'll see you next time.
791
00:34:41.350 --> 00:34:43.630
Andrew Dunkley: We will. Professor Fred Watson, Astronomer at
792
00:34:43.630 --> 00:34:45.990
large. Don't forget to visit us online in the
793
00:34:45.990 --> 00:34:48.990
meantime@spacenutspodcast.com or
794
00:34:48.990 --> 00:34:51.910
spacenuts IO you can have a
795
00:34:51.910 --> 00:34:53.670
look around. You can visit the shop, you can
796
00:34:53.670 --> 00:34:56.430
sign up for the daily news feed. Uh,
797
00:34:56.630 --> 00:34:58.790
if you hit the supporter page. There are ways
798
00:34:58.790 --> 00:35:01.430
to support us if you so desire. We will never
799
00:35:01.730 --> 00:35:04.730
make you do it. It's voluntary. And plenty of
800
00:35:04.730 --> 00:35:06.530
other things to see and do. And don't forget
801
00:35:06.530 --> 00:35:08.250
our social media while you're at it, the
802
00:35:08.250 --> 00:35:10.850
Space Nuts Facebook page or the
803
00:35:10.930 --> 00:35:13.730
podcast group on, uh, Facebook.
804
00:35:13.730 --> 00:35:15.610
They're very active. Always new members
805
00:35:15.610 --> 00:35:18.050
joining there. We're on Instagram as well.
806
00:35:18.530 --> 00:35:20.810
And I was going to say something else. Oh,
807
00:35:20.810 --> 00:35:23.490
no, I can't remember. Anyway, um, that's just
808
00:35:23.490 --> 00:35:25.330
about it. Um, also thanks to Huw in the
809
00:35:25.330 --> 00:35:27.950
studio who couldn't be with us today. He's,
810
00:35:27.950 --> 00:35:30.910
um, gone out to uh, the back to uh, to
811
00:35:30.910 --> 00:35:33.270
brood for not being named Australian of the
812
00:35:33.270 --> 00:35:35.750
Year. And from me, Andrew Dunkley. Thanks for
813
00:35:35.750 --> 00:35:37.550
your company. See you on the next episode of
814
00:35:37.550 --> 00:35:38.870
SpaceNuts. Bye bye.
815
00:35:40.230 --> 00:35:42.430
You've been listening to the Space Nuts
816
00:35:42.430 --> 00:35:45.390
podcast available at
817
00:35:45.390 --> 00:35:47.350
Apple Podcasts, Spotify,
818
00:35:47.590 --> 00:35:50.350
iHeartRadio or your favorite podcast
819
00:35:50.350 --> 00:35:52.070
player. You can also stream on
820
00:35:52.070 --> 00:35:55.030
demand@bytes.com. this has been another
821
00:35:55.030 --> 00:35:57.070
quality podcast production from
822
00:35:57.070 --> 00:35:58.230
bytes.um.com.