March 15, 2026

Stellar Evolutions, Dark Energy Mysteries & Your Questions Answered | Space Nuts: Astronomy...

Stellar Evolutions, Dark Energy Mysteries & Your Questions Answered | Space Nuts: Astronomy...
Stellar Evolutions, Dark Energy Mysteries & Your Questions Answered | Space Nuts: Astronomy...
Space News Today
Stellar Evolutions, Dark Energy Mysteries & Your Questions Answered | Space Nuts: Astronomy...

Cosmic Q&A: Red Giants, Accretion Disks, and Dark Energy

In this captivating Q&A episode of Space Nuts , hosts Andrew Dunkley and Professor Fred Watson tackle a variety of listener questions that span the cosmos. From the fate of our Sun as it becomes a red giant to the mysteries of dark energy, this episode is a treasure trove of astronomical insights and engaging discussions.

Episode Highlights:

- The Fate of Our Sun: Jeff from Arkansas asks about the implications of the Sun swelling into a red giant in approximately 5 billion years. Andrew and Fred explain the process and its potential effects on the outer planets, addressing concerns about rogue planets and gravitational influences.

- Understanding Accretion Disks: Blue from London inquires about the apparent high-speed motion of material in accretion disks around black holes despite gravitational time dilation. The hosts clarify the dynamics at play and the distances involved in these cosmic phenomena.

- Expanding Universe Mysteries: Julian from Canada poses questions about the expansion of the universe and its acceleration. Andrew and Fred dive into the complexities of dark energy and the Hubble constant, shedding light on current theories and ongoing research.

- Dark Energy and the Multiverse: Peter from Sandy Kaye explores the possibility of unseen matter in the universe affecting expansion and whether other universes could influence ours. The discussion delves into speculative theories and the nature of gravity.


For more Space Nuts, including our continuously updating newsfeed and to listen to all our episodes, visit our website. (https://www.spacenutspodcast.com/) Follow us on social media at SpaceNutsPod on Facebook, Instagram, and more. We love engaging with our community, so be sure to drop us a message or comment on your favorite platform.

If you’d like to help support Space Nuts and join our growing family of insiders for commercial-free episodes and more, visit spacenutspodcast.com/about (https://www.spacenutspodcast.com/about) .

Stay curious, keep looking up, and join us next time for more stellar insights and cosmic wonders. Until then, clear skies and happy stargazing.


Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/space-nuts-astronomy-insights-cosmic-discoveries--2631155/support (https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/space-nuts-astronomy-insights-cosmic-discoveries--2631155/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss) .

Episode link: https://play.headliner.app/episode/32214243?utm_source=youtube

WEBVTT
Kind: captions
Language: en

00:00:00.800 --> 00:00:02.389
Hi there. Thanks for joining us. This is


00:00:02.399 --> 00:00:04.789
a Q&A edition of Space Nuts, uh, where


00:00:04.799 --> 00:00:07.030
we talk astronomy and space science. And


00:00:07.040 --> 00:00:09.910
in the Q&A episode, we answer questions


00:00:09.920 --> 00:00:11.669
from our audience. We've got a whole


00:00:11.679 --> 00:00:14.629
bunch today. Uh, we're going to, uh,


00:00:14.639 --> 00:00:17.430
hear from Jeff, uh, who wants to discuss


00:00:17.440 --> 00:00:20.310
the effect when the sun goes red giant,


00:00:20.320 --> 00:00:21.830
which is going to happen in a couple of


00:00:21.840 --> 00:00:24.150
weeks. Uh, no, it's not. No, it's not.


00:00:24.160 --> 00:00:26.310
Uh, Blue is asking about accretion


00:00:26.320 --> 00:00:28.950
discs. Julian about the expansion of the


00:00:28.960 --> 00:00:30.950
universe and one of our old favorite


00:00:30.960 --> 00:00:33.750
topics from Peter, dark energy. That's


00:00:33.760 --> 00:00:35.510
all coming up in this episode of Space


00:00:35.520 --> 00:00:36.229
Nuts.


00:00:36.239 --> 00:00:41.030
>> 15 seconds. Guidance is internal. 10 9g


00:00:41.040 --> 00:00:42.790
Ignition sequence start.


00:00:42.800 --> 00:00:43.670
>> Space nuts.


00:00:43.680 --> 00:00:48.630
>> 5 4 3 2 1 2 3 4 5 5 4 3 2 1


00:00:48.640 --> 00:00:49.830
>> Space Nuts.


00:00:49.840 --> 00:00:53.189
>> Astronauts report. It feels good.


00:00:53.199 --> 00:00:55.029
And back again to furnish us with his


00:00:55.039 --> 00:00:56.549
wisdom or just to have a couple of lucky


00:00:56.559 --> 00:00:58.310
guesses is Professor Fred Watson,


00:00:58.320 --> 00:01:00.549
astronomer at large. Hello, Fred.


00:01:00.559 --> 00:01:02.150
>> How are you doing, Andrew? Good to see


00:01:02.160 --> 00:01:02.470
you.


00:01:02.480 --> 00:01:03.910
>> Good. And you?


00:01:03.920 --> 00:01:06.550
>> Yes. Uh, firing on all cylinders as far


00:01:06.560 --> 00:01:07.510
as I know.


00:01:07.520 --> 00:01:09.590
>> That's all right. Um, although back then


00:01:09.600 --> 00:01:13.750
they only made them with three Celad.


00:01:13.760 --> 00:01:15.830
>> Oh gosh, I'm in a wicked mood today.


00:01:15.840 --> 00:01:18.469
Sorry about that.


00:01:18.479 --> 00:01:20.789
>> Yep. Okay, we better get on with it now.


00:01:20.799 --> 00:01:23.030
Um, I will put out an appeal like I did


00:01:23.040 --> 00:01:25.749
at the end of the last episode for audio


00:01:25.759 --> 00:01:27.990
questions. Questions in general, but


00:01:28.000 --> 00:01:29.910
audio questions particularly. We are


00:01:29.920 --> 00:01:32.230
desperately short and we don't know why.


00:01:32.240 --> 00:01:34.550
It's just a weird quirk of fate, I


00:01:34.560 --> 00:01:36.550
suppose. But if you would like to send


00:01:36.560 --> 00:01:38.550
us some audio questions, you can do that


00:01:38.560 --> 00:01:41.109
on our website, spacenuts.io,


00:01:41.119 --> 00:01:44.390
and click on the AMA ask me anything tab


00:01:44.400 --> 00:01:47.190
at the top and send us the message. Uh,


00:01:47.200 --> 00:01:48.630
don't forget to tell us who you are and


00:01:48.640 --> 00:01:50.789
where you're from. Our first question,


00:01:50.799 --> 00:01:53.910
Fred, uh, comes from Jeff in Fatville,


00:01:53.920 --> 00:01:55.830
Arkansas in the United States. Hello,


00:01:55.840 --> 00:01:57.429
gentlemen. Well, he's wrong for a start.


00:01:57.439 --> 00:02:00.789
I mean, come on. Um, I happened upon


00:02:00.799 --> 00:02:03.350
your podcast several months ago and


00:02:03.360 --> 00:02:05.270
enjoy it very much. Last month, you


00:02:05.280 --> 00:02:07.190
discussed the thought experiment having


00:02:07.200 --> 00:02:09.270
to do with uh what would happen if the


00:02:09.280 --> 00:02:11.270
rest uh to the rest of the solar system


00:02:11.280 --> 00:02:13.750
if the sun suddenly disappeared. My


00:02:13.760 --> 00:02:15.990
question is a little bit more concrete.


00:02:16.000 --> 00:02:18.710
Uh, in 5 billion years or so, our sun is


00:02:18.720 --> 00:02:20.550
expected to swell into a red giant


00:02:20.560 --> 00:02:22.710
before perhaps collapsing into a white


00:02:22.720 --> 00:02:25.910
dwarf. What will this do to our sun's


00:02:25.920 --> 00:02:28.390
total mass? And what effect will it have


00:02:28.400 --> 00:02:30.869
on the outer planets that survive being


00:02:30.879 --> 00:02:32.630
engulfed? Earth not being one of them,


00:02:32.640 --> 00:02:35.350
as it turns out. I um a follow-up


00:02:35.360 --> 00:02:37.910
question. Uh, are other suns dying


00:02:37.920 --> 00:02:39.830
throughout our galaxy responsible for


00:02:39.840 --> 00:02:41.990
the rogue planets far out in space


00:02:42.000 --> 00:02:43.990
between stars that I've read about?


00:02:44.000 --> 00:02:45.509
Thank you for your time and the


00:02:45.519 --> 00:02:47.509
stimulating discussions you allow me to


00:02:47.519 --> 00:02:50.309
listen into. Thank you Jeff. That's uh


00:02:50.319 --> 00:02:52.550
lovely. Uh a few questions in there


00:02:52.560 --> 00:02:55.910
Fred. Uh so um yes our our sun which we


00:02:55.920 --> 00:02:58.070
have talked about going you know


00:02:58.080 --> 00:03:02.869
ballistic uh in about five billion or so


00:03:02.879 --> 00:03:05.509
years. Uh what happens to the outer


00:03:05.519 --> 00:03:07.270
planets?


00:03:07.280 --> 00:03:09.990
>> Uh that's yes it is a great question. Um


00:03:10.000 --> 00:03:13.670
and I I think the um the sort of


00:03:13.680 --> 00:03:15.910
implicit assumption is that is that the


00:03:15.920 --> 00:03:18.710
inner planets are not going to be around


00:03:18.720 --> 00:03:20.869
>> no which probably will include the earth


00:03:20.879 --> 00:03:25.350
and possibly even Mars. So the um yes


00:03:25.360 --> 00:03:28.149
the process uh towards the end of the


00:03:28.159 --> 00:03:30.070
sun's life and somewhere in the region


00:03:30.080 --> 00:03:32.070
of 3 to 5 billion years I think the


00:03:32.080 --> 00:03:35.750
process starts about three billion years


00:03:35.760 --> 00:03:37.509
hence. So it's a little bit earlier than


00:03:37.519 --> 00:03:40.149
Jeff says. So, um, I hope that's not a


00:03:40.159 --> 00:03:43.750
cause for alarm. Uh, 3 billion at his


00:03:43.760 --> 00:03:45.030
watch, so he's going to have to reset


00:03:45.040 --> 00:03:47.110
that. And that's always a pain.


00:03:47.120 --> 00:03:51.110
>> It is. That's right. Yeah. Um, I the


00:03:51.120 --> 00:03:53.910
other day set dutifully set the timer to


00:03:53.920 --> 00:03:56.470
time down on my uh my phone because I


00:03:56.480 --> 00:03:59.190
had to take things out of the oven and


00:03:59.200 --> 00:04:01.750
um um it got to the end of the time and


00:04:01.760 --> 00:04:03.429
didn't do anything. Just


00:04:03.439 --> 00:04:04.229
>> Oh, I hate it.


00:04:04.239 --> 00:04:05.270
>> It stopped.


00:04:05.280 --> 00:04:06.949
>> I did too.


00:04:06.959 --> 00:04:09.030
My phone suddenly decided to put all


00:04:09.040 --> 00:04:11.429
calls through to voicemail before I can


00:04:11.439 --> 00:04:13.750
even before I even know it's ringing.


00:04:13.760 --> 00:04:15.030
Picked it up the other day and thought,


00:04:15.040 --> 00:04:16.629
why is it vibrating? And then I realized


00:04:16.639 --> 00:04:18.710
my sister was ringing me, but it was


00:04:18.720 --> 00:04:19.990
making no sound. There was no


00:04:20.000 --> 00:04:22.390
indication. It just filtered and and


00:04:22.400 --> 00:04:24.230
when I I I pushed a couple of buttons,


00:04:24.240 --> 00:04:26.710
eventually found her and she said, "Oh


00:04:26.720 --> 00:04:28.070
yeah, I was just listening to your


00:04:28.080 --> 00:04:30.070
message."


00:04:30.080 --> 00:04:32.150
>> Well, there you go. Voicemail,


00:04:32.160 --> 00:04:33.990
>> which is not a problem we'll be really


00:04:34.000 --> 00:04:35.510
worried about in 3 minutes. No, not just


00:04:35.520 --> 00:04:37.590
time because but if anyone knows the


00:04:37.600 --> 00:04:39.749
answer to that, please let me know.


00:04:39.759 --> 00:04:41.909
>> Oh, well, I can tell you the answer. You


00:04:41.919 --> 00:04:43.990
have a smartwatch and that wings as


00:04:44.000 --> 00:04:44.550
well.


00:04:44.560 --> 00:04:47.189
>> Well, I yeah, I don't think I had it on


00:04:47.199 --> 00:04:50.070
at the time. So, ah


00:04:50.080 --> 00:04:53.670
>> anyway um so uh so yes, the inner


00:04:53.680 --> 00:04:56.310
planets get swallowed up um as the sun


00:04:56.320 --> 00:04:58.710
swells. It's it doesn't happen suddenly.


00:04:58.720 --> 00:05:01.510
It is a it's a fairly leisurely process.


00:05:01.520 --> 00:05:04.710
There is a collapse of the core down to


00:05:04.720 --> 00:05:07.590
a white dwarf star which is the end


00:05:07.600 --> 00:05:10.070
product is this white dwarf star which


00:05:10.080 --> 00:05:12.550
is the size of the earth but with quite


00:05:12.560 --> 00:05:14.230
a lot of the mass of the sun still


00:05:14.240 --> 00:05:17.990
tucked in there uh and an outer shell of


00:05:18.000 --> 00:05:20.150
expanding gas and we if we were looking


00:05:20.160 --> 00:05:21.670
at that from the outside we'd call it a


00:05:21.680 --> 00:05:25.110
planetary nebula. So that outer shell of


00:05:25.120 --> 00:05:28.710
gas uh is hot. Uh it's hot enough to


00:05:28.720 --> 00:05:31.350
basically vaporize the the inner


00:05:31.360 --> 00:05:34.150
planets. Uh so but Jeff's question is


00:05:34.160 --> 00:05:36.390
not about that. It's about how do things


00:05:36.400 --> 00:05:39.270
look from the outside. And so the outer


00:05:39.280 --> 00:05:43.270
planets uh interestingly their orbits


00:05:43.280 --> 00:05:45.430
will be perturbed


00:05:45.440 --> 00:05:48.710
um which means changed but maybe not as


00:05:48.720 --> 00:05:51.110
dramatically as you might think because


00:05:51.120 --> 00:05:53.590
um that swelling


00:05:53.600 --> 00:05:55.749
it what it's doing is if you look at the


00:05:55.759 --> 00:05:57.749
center of gravity of all that it's still


00:05:57.759 --> 00:06:00.230
at the center of the solar system uh


00:06:00.240 --> 00:06:02.310
even though the outer layers of the star


00:06:02.320 --> 00:06:04.550
and there's a significant amount of mass


00:06:04.560 --> 00:06:05.990
in that even though most of the mass


00:06:06.000 --> 00:06:07.909
going to be concentrated in the white


00:06:07.919 --> 00:06:10.390
dwarf star, but the outer layers are are


00:06:10.400 --> 00:06:14.150
expanding. You're outside that zone. So


00:06:14.160 --> 00:06:16.550
to you, the center of gravity, center of


00:06:16.560 --> 00:06:19.430
mass of the solar system remains where


00:06:19.440 --> 00:06:23.590
the sun is now. And so the effect on the


00:06:23.600 --> 00:06:25.590
orbits of the planets might not be as


00:06:25.600 --> 00:06:28.150
dramatic as propelling one of them out


00:06:28.160 --> 00:06:30.230
uh to become a rogue planet.


00:06:30.240 --> 00:06:34.309
>> So uh it could be a lot gentler than I


00:06:34.319 --> 00:06:36.469
mean a supernova is different. If it


00:06:36.479 --> 00:06:38.390
explodes, then you're talking about


00:06:38.400 --> 00:06:41.110
dramatic and cataclysmic events that


00:06:41.120 --> 00:06:43.029
would certainly disturb the orbits of


00:06:43.039 --> 00:06:44.950
planets, although some planets seem to


00:06:44.960 --> 00:06:46.390
be able to survive that. We can see


00:06:46.400 --> 00:06:49.189
supernova remnants with with planets


00:06:49.199 --> 00:06:52.390
chugging around. Anyway, this this um


00:06:52.400 --> 00:06:55.590
this scene, this scenario is that uh


00:06:55.600 --> 00:06:57.749
there may still be planets which will be


00:06:57.759 --> 00:06:59.270
outside


00:06:59.280 --> 00:07:02.790
uh the um you know the envelope of the


00:07:02.800 --> 00:07:06.150
of the white of the red giant. Now


00:07:06.160 --> 00:07:09.189
eventually that envelope is going to


00:07:09.199 --> 00:07:13.670
pass the uh pass the the outer planets


00:07:13.680 --> 00:07:16.790
uh and may evaporate them as well uh


00:07:16.800 --> 00:07:18.629
depending on what sort of temperature it


00:07:18.639 --> 00:07:23.029
is. But um the the the so the red giant


00:07:23.039 --> 00:07:25.670
phase the outer planets might be still


00:07:25.680 --> 00:07:27.909
okay and still say it's stable. But once


00:07:27.919 --> 00:07:29.830
it progresses beyond that and you get to


00:07:29.840 --> 00:07:31.830
the planetary nebula stage where the


00:07:31.840 --> 00:07:34.309
outer layer is light years in diameter


00:07:34.319 --> 00:07:36.550
rather than rather than just a few


00:07:36.560 --> 00:07:39.189
hundred million kilometers in diameter


00:07:39.199 --> 00:07:42.070
trillion kilometers in diameter um then


00:07:42.080 --> 00:07:44.629
you're you're probably in trouble if


00:07:44.639 --> 00:07:46.469
you're on the outer planets as well.


00:07:46.479 --> 00:07:49.029
>> Okay. How long does that process take to


00:07:49.039 --> 00:07:50.629
to reach that nebula state?


00:07:50.639 --> 00:07:52.550
>> It's it's it's relatively slow. You're


00:07:52.560 --> 00:07:54.309
talking about billions of years. Wow.


00:07:54.319 --> 00:07:59.990
>> Uh yeah. Uh so I mean there must be


00:08:00.000 --> 00:08:02.150
there must be a collapse phase for the


00:08:02.160 --> 00:08:05.909
nucleus. Uh I'm not an expert on these


00:08:05.919 --> 00:08:08.550
what we call highly evolved stars. Uh


00:08:08.560 --> 00:08:11.350
but as as it goes from red giant to a


00:08:11.360 --> 00:08:14.230
planetary nebula that's when you you you


00:08:14.240 --> 00:08:16.070
change into a white dwarf in the middle


00:08:16.080 --> 00:08:17.670
you've got the nucleus of the star


00:08:17.680 --> 00:08:19.589
collapsing. So these are the end


00:08:19.599 --> 00:08:21.749
products of normal stars. Actually a


00:08:21.759 --> 00:08:23.510
normal star will go through this phase.


00:08:23.520 --> 00:08:25.510
A massive star will become a supernova.


00:08:25.520 --> 00:08:27.589
It will explode.


00:08:27.599 --> 00:08:30.390
>> Wow. Okay. So, you pretty well answered


00:08:30.400 --> 00:08:32.870
everything in one hit. Um, the white


00:08:32.880 --> 00:08:35.190
dwarf will have the same mass as our sun


00:08:35.200 --> 00:08:38.070
at the moment, more or less. So, it


00:08:38.080 --> 00:08:39.829
won't really have an impact on the outer


00:08:39.839 --> 00:08:42.709
planets until after the halo effect over


00:08:42.719 --> 00:08:44.310
billions of years


00:08:44.320 --> 00:08:46.870
>> and probably not enough effect to cause


00:08:46.880 --> 00:08:48.150
rogue planets.


00:08:48.160 --> 00:08:49.910
>> I think that's right. Yes. I mean, I


00:08:49.920 --> 00:08:52.389
think evaporated planets is more likely.


00:08:52.399 --> 00:08:56.870
>> Yeah. Uh um so rogue planets uh are most


00:08:56.880 --> 00:09:00.070
likely formed either


00:09:00.080 --> 00:09:03.030
just formed in in gas clouds collapsing


00:09:03.040 --> 00:09:04.949
into stars. These are things that aren't


00:09:04.959 --> 00:09:06.630
big enough to collapse into stars though


00:09:06.640 --> 00:09:09.670
they become little planets on their own


00:09:09.680 --> 00:09:11.910
or by being ejected because of a


00:09:11.920 --> 00:09:13.750
gravitational influence. You know, if


00:09:13.760 --> 00:09:15.670
you get two planets that pass very close


00:09:15.680 --> 00:09:17.030
to each other or something like that,


00:09:17.040 --> 00:09:19.509
one of them might get booted out of the


00:09:19.519 --> 00:09:21.110
of their solar system.


00:09:21.120 --> 00:09:22.710
>> There you go, Jeff. Hopefully that


00:09:22.720 --> 00:09:24.710
answered all of your questions. Uh we


00:09:24.720 --> 00:09:27.190
like multifaceted questions. It um takes


00:09:27.200 --> 00:09:29.030
us up into all sorts of strange


00:09:29.040 --> 00:09:30.550
directions sometimes. Great to hear from


00:09:30.560 --> 00:09:33.350
you. Hope all is well in Arkansas. Uh


00:09:33.360 --> 00:09:36.230
Fred, our next question comes from Blue.


00:09:36.240 --> 00:09:38.150
He's from London. Uh I have a question


00:09:38.160 --> 00:09:40.230
about accretion discs. Given that


00:09:40.240 --> 00:09:42.630
gravitational time dilation causes time


00:09:42.640 --> 00:09:45.030
to pass much slower near a black hole


00:09:45.040 --> 00:09:47.430
relative to Earth, why does the disc


00:09:47.440 --> 00:09:50.870
appear to move at high speeds to us? Uh,


00:09:50.880 --> 00:09:52.710
I would have expected the material to


00:09:52.720 --> 00:09:55.110
look like it's moving at extreme slow


00:09:55.120 --> 00:09:58.230
motion or even stop moving the closer


00:09:58.240 --> 00:10:00.710
you get to the event horizon. Love the


00:10:00.720 --> 00:10:04.470
show, guys. Thanks, Blue. Um, okay. I


00:10:04.480 --> 00:10:05.590
know you're going to know the answer to


00:10:05.600 --> 00:10:07.190
this one because I think we've had a


00:10:07.200 --> 00:10:09.030
similar question before, but it seems to


00:10:09.040 --> 00:10:12.230
be a an an ongoing theme with black


00:10:12.240 --> 00:10:13.990
holes. Why do we see things that we


00:10:14.000 --> 00:10:16.230
don't think we should see?


00:10:16.240 --> 00:10:19.670
Um so yes, the the accretion disc um is


00:10:19.680 --> 00:10:21.590
actually quite a long way from the black


00:10:21.600 --> 00:10:25.030
hole. Uh and a lot of that swirling


00:10:25.040 --> 00:10:28.949
material is uh ejected from the black


00:10:28.959 --> 00:10:30.550
hole rather than getting sucked in by


00:10:30.560 --> 00:10:32.710
the magnetic fields that the black hole


00:10:32.720 --> 00:10:35.990
generates. It sort of projects um the


00:10:36.000 --> 00:10:37.910
accretion disc material at very high


00:10:37.920 --> 00:10:39.590
velocities to the sort of north and


00:10:39.600 --> 00:10:42.949
south of the of the accretion disc. So


00:10:42.959 --> 00:10:46.389
um there will be a time dilation effect.


00:10:46.399 --> 00:10:51.590
Uh I I should check this uh as to how


00:10:51.600 --> 00:10:54.389
much it would be. But I think the


00:10:54.399 --> 00:10:57.750
overarching point is that you're far


00:10:57.760 --> 00:11:00.870
enough away from the event horizon that


00:11:00.880 --> 00:11:03.030
time dilation in the accretion disc is


00:11:03.040 --> 00:11:05.990
not great. It's not high enough. Uh I


00:11:06.000 --> 00:11:07.750
think it's all a matter of scale rather


00:11:07.760 --> 00:11:09.670
than being a matter of the phenomenon


00:11:09.680 --> 00:11:12.310
which I think Blue's right. I think is


00:11:12.320 --> 00:11:14.949
you know anything that gets close to the


00:11:14.959 --> 00:11:17.110
uh to the black holes event horizon is


00:11:17.120 --> 00:11:20.150
going to show up um a time dilation


00:11:20.160 --> 00:11:21.350
phenomenon.


00:11:21.360 --> 00:11:23.269
>> I suppose it would also depend on what


00:11:23.279 --> 00:11:25.430
kind of black hole it is. I mean some of


00:11:25.440 --> 00:11:27.509
them are massively massive.


00:11:27.519 --> 00:11:29.750
>> The massive Yes, that's right. Uh that's


00:11:29.760 --> 00:11:34.150
correct. Um so um a super massive black


00:11:34.160 --> 00:11:36.790
hole will produce a a bigger a bigger


00:11:36.800 --> 00:11:40.069
phenomenon. Um, I'm just going to try


00:11:40.079 --> 00:11:43.350
looking something up, uh, to see if I


00:11:43.360 --> 00:11:48.389
can put any detail on that. Uh,


00:11:48.399 --> 00:11:49.910
um,


00:11:49.920 --> 00:11:50.710
which I should have done.


00:11:50.720 --> 00:11:55.430
>> I'm helping you a lot here.


00:11:55.440 --> 00:11:57.670
>> Yeah. Okay. All right. Here you are.


00:11:57.680 --> 00:12:00.870
Here's a number for a 10,000 solar mass


00:12:00.880 --> 00:12:03.430
black hole. And that's a bit I mean


00:12:03.440 --> 00:12:08.790
that's the kind of limit um uh of what


00:12:08.800 --> 00:12:10.949
we call an intermediate mass black hole


00:12:10.959 --> 00:12:12.389
something measured in tens of thousands


00:12:12.399 --> 00:12:15.910
of solar masses. Uh for a 10,000 solar


00:12:15.920 --> 00:12:17.590
mass black hole the time dilation of the


00:12:17.600 --> 00:12:20.470
incre the accretion disc inner edge is


00:12:20.480 --> 00:12:23.190
only 22%. So it's what I've said it's


00:12:23.200 --> 00:12:25.829
the scale of the process that makes


00:12:25.839 --> 00:12:28.150
makes the difference.


00:12:28.160 --> 00:12:31.670
Fair enough. Okay. Simple answer really.


00:12:31.680 --> 00:12:34.389
it. Yep. Seems to be


00:12:34.399 --> 00:12:36.550
all right. Thank you, Blue. Hope you're


00:12:36.560 --> 00:12:38.949
going well. Love London. Uh only been


00:12:38.959 --> 00:12:42.470
there twice, I think. Twice. Yes. And uh


00:12:42.480 --> 00:12:43.990
yeah, really enjoyed my time. It's a


00:12:44.000 --> 00:12:46.629
It's a beautiful city. Really love that


00:12:46.639 --> 00:12:49.030
place. I'd go back tomorrow if I could.


00:12:49.040 --> 00:12:51.910
Um thank you, Blue. And um this is Space


00:12:51.920 --> 00:12:54.230
Nuts. You're listening to it with Andrew


00:12:54.240 --> 00:12:58.710
Dunley and Professor Fred Watson.


00:12:58.720 --> 00:13:00.949
We choose to go to the moon in this


00:13:00.959 --> 00:13:03.509
decade and do the other things not


00:13:03.519 --> 00:13:05.829
because they are easy but because they


00:13:05.839 --> 00:13:06.470
are hard.


00:13:06.480 --> 00:13:08.629
>> These nuts.


00:13:08.639 --> 00:13:12.949
>> Next question. Fred. Hey nutters.


00:13:12.959 --> 00:13:16.150
Uh Julian from Bmpton, Ontario, Canada.


00:13:16.160 --> 00:13:19.430
Here. Uh what is causing the expansion


00:13:19.440 --> 00:13:21.110
of the universe? Oh, that old chestnut.


00:13:21.120 --> 00:13:25.670
I mean, uh, are we a black hole eating


00:13:25.680 --> 00:13:29.030
outside matter or are other fundamental


00:13:29.040 --> 00:13:32.310
forces responsible or are the forces


00:13:32.320 --> 00:13:34.470
actually keeping us together? Part two,


00:13:34.480 --> 00:13:36.230
I think we're up to part four actually.


00:13:36.240 --> 00:13:38.389
Part two of this question would be, Fred


00:13:38.399 --> 00:13:40.230
mentioned the universe is expanding


00:13:40.240 --> 00:13:43.110
slower. Does that mean we know exactly


00:13:43.120 --> 00:13:45.750
how fast the universe is expanding and


00:13:45.760 --> 00:13:48.470
does that mean speeds faster than light?


00:13:48.480 --> 00:13:50.470
I hope you all got that. Love the show.


00:13:50.480 --> 00:13:53.269
Thanks, Julian. Oh, he's packed in a lot


00:13:53.279 --> 00:13:57.990
there in three or four sentences. Um,


00:13:58.000 --> 00:13:59.910
what's causing the expansion of the


00:13:59.920 --> 00:14:01.750
universe, Fred? And I know the answer to


00:14:01.760 --> 00:14:03.910
this one.


00:14:03.920 --> 00:14:07.750
>> Um, I think, well, you know, the way we


00:14:07.760 --> 00:14:11.430
usually interpret the big bang is,


00:14:11.440 --> 00:14:13.430
um,


00:14:13.440 --> 00:14:15.110
in the beginning there was nothing and


00:14:15.120 --> 00:14:16.389
then it exploded.


00:14:16.399 --> 00:14:17.670
>> Yeah.


00:14:17.680 --> 00:14:21.269
And that's kind of more or less what it


00:14:21.279 --> 00:14:24.470
was. Uh and so it's we're still seeing


00:14:24.480 --> 00:14:26.389
the aftermath or the effect of that


00:14:26.399 --> 00:14:29.030
explosion in the expansion. So it's


00:14:29.040 --> 00:14:34.310
driven by uh by a you know a some


00:14:34.320 --> 00:14:37.189
fundamental injection of energy at the


00:14:37.199 --> 00:14:38.949
start of the universe. We can kind of


00:14:38.959 --> 00:14:40.790
quantify how much it was. It's a very


00:14:40.800 --> 00:14:43.590
large number. uh that set the expansion


00:14:43.600 --> 00:14:47.670
in motion and it's still going on now.


00:14:47.680 --> 00:14:50.069
Um


00:14:50.079 --> 00:14:53.110
the second bit of the question is the is


00:14:53.120 --> 00:14:55.430
the interesting bit part two.


00:14:55.440 --> 00:14:57.910
>> Uh so so


00:14:57.920 --> 00:15:00.230
let me just yes there are a number of


00:15:00.240 --> 00:15:02.949
parts here. Are we a black hole eating


00:15:02.959 --> 00:15:06.470
outside material? U some scientists have


00:15:06.480 --> 00:15:08.230
suggested that we are within the event


00:15:08.240 --> 00:15:10.790
horizon of a black pole and that's


00:15:10.800 --> 00:15:11.590
what's I've heard


00:15:11.600 --> 00:15:13.030
>> what's causing the expansion of the


00:15:13.040 --> 00:15:15.670
universe. It's a very uh speculative


00:15:15.680 --> 00:15:18.710
idea. Um it's not one I'm very fond of


00:15:18.720 --> 00:15:20.470
because I


00:15:20.480 --> 00:15:21.910
you know I think I think we need a bit


00:15:21.920 --> 00:15:23.990
more hard evidence as to whether that


00:15:24.000 --> 00:15:27.110
black hole is there. Um are we a black


00:15:27.120 --> 00:15:29.910
hole eating outside material? Probably


00:15:29.920 --> 00:15:32.150
not. Or are there other fundamental


00:15:32.160 --> 00:15:34.949
forces responsible? Uh well yes maybe


00:15:34.959 --> 00:15:37.670
and that comes to the second bit of the


00:15:37.680 --> 00:15:40.870
question. Uh it says Fred mentioned the


00:15:40.880 --> 00:15:43.030
universe is expanding slower. That's


00:15:43.040 --> 00:15:46.389
actually not the case. Uh it's expanding


00:15:46.399 --> 00:15:48.710
faster all the time but that


00:15:48.720 --> 00:15:51.189
acceleration is reducing reducing.


00:15:51.199 --> 00:15:51.910
>> Yes.


00:15:51.920 --> 00:15:54.310
>> So the conundrum isn't it?


00:15:54.320 --> 00:15:56.389
>> It is thought expanding at a faster


00:15:56.399 --> 00:16:00.389
rate. Now it's expanding faster slower.


00:16:00.399 --> 00:16:02.870
>> Faster slower. That's right. Um I mean


00:16:02.880 --> 00:16:04.550
before we used to think it was expanding


00:16:04.560 --> 00:16:06.069
at a slower rate. We used to think in


00:16:06.079 --> 00:16:08.949
the in the 70s and 80s that it was


00:16:08.959 --> 00:16:10.470
slowing down. The expansion was slowing


00:16:10.480 --> 00:16:12.310
down and one day they'd be perhaps a


00:16:12.320 --> 00:16:14.389
reversal of the expansion and a big


00:16:14.399 --> 00:16:17.269
crunch. Then in 1998 along came Branch


00:16:17.279 --> 00:16:19.430
Schmidt and Saul Pearlmuta and between


00:16:19.440 --> 00:16:21.749
them they figured out and Adam Ree of


00:16:21.759 --> 00:16:23.829
course the three Nobel Prize winners in


00:16:23.839 --> 00:16:26.710
2011 uh they figured out that actually


00:16:26.720 --> 00:16:29.189
uh the expansion is accelerating.


00:16:29.199 --> 00:16:31.990
>> Um and that's still the case today. That


00:16:32.000 --> 00:16:33.990
is the situation we have. The expansion


00:16:34.000 --> 00:16:37.350
is still is accelerating but there is


00:16:37.360 --> 00:16:41.030
now new evidence uh that suggests that


00:16:41.040 --> 00:16:45.590
the ex the acceleration is reducing. So


00:16:45.600 --> 00:16:47.749
it's not that the expansion of the


00:16:47.759 --> 00:16:49.749
universe is slowing down, it's that the


00:16:49.759 --> 00:16:51.430
acceleration of the expansion of the


00:16:51.440 --> 00:16:53.430
universe is slowing down. Yeah. And


00:16:53.440 --> 00:16:56.069
that's a different matter. So it's still


00:16:56.079 --> 00:16:58.230
>> Yeah. It's still accelerating in its


00:16:58.240 --> 00:17:02.069
expansion. And we attribute that to dark


00:17:02.079 --> 00:17:07.990
energy. Um that is something that


00:17:08.000 --> 00:17:10.390
the new results that suggest that the


00:17:10.400 --> 00:17:13.510
acceleration is slowing down uh actually


00:17:13.520 --> 00:17:15.029
throw a spanner in the works because we


00:17:15.039 --> 00:17:18.069
thought we understood dark energy as uh


00:17:18.079 --> 00:17:20.150
what's called a cos a co cosmological


00:17:20.160 --> 00:17:22.549
constant. A force that basically is


00:17:22.559 --> 00:17:24.949
proportional to the size of space. The


00:17:24.959 --> 00:17:26.549
more space you have, the more e


00:17:26.559 --> 00:17:28.309
expansion force there is a kind of


00:17:28.319 --> 00:17:31.270
pressure if you like of space itself. Uh


00:17:31.280 --> 00:17:33.029
springiness of space.


00:17:33.039 --> 00:17:35.830
>> Um the fact that as time goes on that


00:17:35.840 --> 00:17:38.390
expansion seems to be uh the


00:17:38.400 --> 00:17:40.150
acceleration of the expansion seems to


00:17:40.160 --> 00:17:44.390
be reducing is uh sus it's actually


00:17:44.400 --> 00:17:46.710
suggestive of new physics which might


00:17:46.720 --> 00:17:48.470
mean higher dimensions and all the other


00:17:48.480 --> 00:17:50.070
good stuff that we love talking about on


00:17:50.080 --> 00:17:50.950
space nuts.


00:17:50.960 --> 00:17:55.430
>> Yes. Um indeed. Uh so so um his last bit


00:17:55.440 --> 00:17:57.830
of the question uh does that mean speeds


00:17:57.840 --> 00:18:01.110
faster than light? Uh there will be a


00:18:01.120 --> 00:18:03.830
limit beyond which we can't see the


00:18:03.840 --> 00:18:07.110
universe because it's expanding from us


00:18:07.120 --> 00:18:09.750
faster than light can get to us and


00:18:09.760 --> 00:18:12.470
that's already the case. Uh but we don't


00:18:12.480 --> 00:18:13.990
see that because we see the cosmic


00:18:14.000 --> 00:18:16.310
microwave background radiation first.


00:18:16.320 --> 00:18:19.590
That's the nearer phenomenon. So um yes.


00:18:19.600 --> 00:18:22.789
So uh it's a interesting set of


00:18:22.799 --> 00:18:26.710
questions uh which I I guess


00:18:26.720 --> 00:18:28.230
highlighting some of the mysteries that


00:18:28.240 --> 00:18:31.430
we face with uh uh with our current


00:18:31.440 --> 00:18:33.350
understanding of cosmology.


00:18:33.360 --> 00:18:35.750
>> In truth in truth though we do not know


00:18:35.760 --> 00:18:37.909
how fast the expansion rate currently


00:18:37.919 --> 00:18:39.669
is. We can't put a number on that can


00:18:39.679 --> 00:18:40.470
we?


00:18:40.480 --> 00:18:41.750
>> Yes we can.


00:18:41.760 --> 00:18:45.430
>> Uh that's the Hubble constant. uh um


00:18:45.440 --> 00:18:45.909
which is


00:18:45.919 --> 00:18:47.669
>> yeah we have talked about that before


00:18:47.679 --> 00:18:49.669
and I remember because there's this


00:18:49.679 --> 00:18:52.150
tension that between the Hubble constant


00:18:52.160 --> 00:18:54.710
as we measure it now uh and the Hubble


00:18:54.720 --> 00:18:57.909
constant as we determine it from the


00:18:57.919 --> 00:18:59.830
cosmic microwave background radiation


00:18:59.840 --> 00:19:02.310
called the Hubble tension which may be


00:19:02.320 --> 00:19:04.470
something that really is just to do with


00:19:04.480 --> 00:19:05.909
our measurements. So the Hubble


00:19:05.919 --> 00:19:08.789
constants in odd units in it's in


00:19:08.799 --> 00:19:12.789
kilometers/s per mega par sec. Uh which


00:19:12.799 --> 00:19:15.830
is basically a fancy way of saying we do


00:19:15.840 --> 00:19:17.029
know how fast


00:19:17.039 --> 00:19:20.390
>> it is. Yeah. The the answer is 70 to 74


00:19:20.400 --> 00:19:23.590
kilometers per second per megap.


00:19:23.600 --> 00:19:24.630
>> Yep.


00:19:24.640 --> 00:19:26.549
>> Give or take.


00:19:26.559 --> 00:19:29.430
>> Well that's right. You know, when when


00:19:29.440 --> 00:19:31.350
when I was a young astronomer, I keep


00:19:31.360 --> 00:19:34.630
saying this, back in the 70s, um there


00:19:34.640 --> 00:19:37.990
were two the estimates of that number


00:19:38.000 --> 00:19:40.230
were out by a factor of two. There was


00:19:40.240 --> 00:19:42.390
one group said it's 50 km per second per


00:19:42.400 --> 00:19:43.990
mega par sec. Another group said it's


00:19:44.000 --> 00:19:46.710
100 kilometers/s mega par sec. And look


00:19:46.720 --> 00:19:48.310
what we've got with the Hubble telescope


00:19:48.320 --> 00:19:49.669
and other instruments. We've got


00:19:49.679 --> 00:19:52.150
basically the average of those two. Uh


00:19:52.160 --> 00:19:54.150
which is quite neat really.


00:19:54.160 --> 00:19:55.990
>> But we still got some uncertainty. There


00:19:56.000 --> 00:19:58.630
was also this um conflict, wasn't there,


00:19:58.640 --> 00:20:01.190
that they were they couldn't figure out


00:20:01.200 --> 00:20:03.270
the answer for, but we did a story about


00:20:03.280 --> 00:20:05.750
them figuring out that the conflict was


00:20:05.760 --> 00:20:08.549
actually normal and we, you know, that's


00:20:08.559 --> 00:20:11.270
within acceptable parameters. I think


00:20:11.280 --> 00:20:14.630
>> we did. Yeah. Okay. Uh did we answer all


00:20:14.640 --> 00:20:17.750
his question? I think we did. Yeah. Um


00:20:17.760 --> 00:20:19.430
Oh, I did look up something else. How


00:20:19.440 --> 00:20:21.830
how powerful was the big bang? uh


00:20:21.840 --> 00:20:25.669
greater than 10^ the 68 jewels.


00:20:25.679 --> 00:20:27.909
>> Okay,


00:20:27.919 --> 00:20:29.669
>> that's what you call a bag.


00:20:29.679 --> 00:20:32.070
>> That's a big big big big big bang. But


00:20:32.080 --> 00:20:34.470
we just shortened it to big bang.


00:20:34.480 --> 00:20:35.750
>> Write that down. This is a good number.


00:20:35.760 --> 00:20:37.669
10^ the 68 jewels.


00:20:37.679 --> 00:20:40.870
>> Yes. Yeah. Put that on your calculator


00:20:40.880 --> 00:20:44.470
and see what happens. Um thank Julian.


00:20:44.480 --> 00:20:47.110
Uh hope you're well. Uh let's uh answer


00:20:47.120 --> 00:20:48.950
one more question before we finish up


00:20:48.960 --> 00:20:50.870
today. And this is a question with 47


00:20:50.880 --> 00:20:53.830
parts. Hi, Professor Fred and Andrew


00:20:53.840 --> 00:20:56.789
Peter here from San Diego, California. I


00:20:56.799 --> 00:20:59.669
have a dual question about dark energy.


00:20:59.679 --> 00:21:01.909
My understanding is that dark energy is


00:21:01.919 --> 00:21:05.350
causing our universe to expand. Also, we


00:21:05.360 --> 00:21:07.190
have an observable part of the universe


00:21:07.200 --> 00:21:09.510
where light is able to reach us and an


00:21:09.520 --> 00:21:11.909
unobservable part of the universe. Funny


00:21:11.919 --> 00:21:13.830
how we already talked about this, but


00:21:13.840 --> 00:21:15.669
the these all these questions kind of


00:21:15.679 --> 00:21:18.470
dovetailed. Question one, is it feasible


00:21:18.480 --> 00:21:20.390
that the unobservable part of the


00:21:20.400 --> 00:21:22.549
universe contains enough matter to act


00:21:22.559 --> 00:21:24.710
gravitationally on the observable


00:21:24.720 --> 00:21:27.350
universe, thus causing the expansion?


00:21:27.360 --> 00:21:28.870
And question two, which we'll get back


00:21:28.880 --> 00:21:31.270
to, uh, same question within the context


00:21:31.280 --> 00:21:33.590
of the multisphere. Could universes


00:21:33.600 --> 00:21:35.750
other than our own be gravitationally


00:21:35.760 --> 00:21:38.549
impacting the expansion of our universe?


00:21:38.559 --> 00:21:40.870
Love your show. Keep up the great work.


00:21:40.880 --> 00:21:43.990
Uh, thank you, Peter. Um question one is


00:21:44.000 --> 00:21:46.070
it feasible that the unobservable part


00:21:46.080 --> 00:21:48.390
of our universe contains enough matter


00:21:48.400 --> 00:21:51.190
to act gravitationally on the observable


00:21:51.200 --> 00:21:53.190
observable universe thus causing the


00:21:53.200 --> 00:21:54.870
expansion.


00:21:54.880 --> 00:21:58.870
Um yes once again we've got to unpick uh


00:21:58.880 --> 00:22:02.630
what we mean by the expansion. So um


00:22:02.640 --> 00:22:04.710
Peter says my understanding is that dark


00:22:04.720 --> 00:22:07.110
energy is causing our universe to expand


00:22:07.120 --> 00:22:08.789
and that's not the case as we've just


00:22:08.799 --> 00:22:10.630
described. It's the big bang that caused


00:22:10.640 --> 00:22:12.390
the universe to expand. But dark energy


00:22:12.400 --> 00:22:14.070
is what's causing the expansion to


00:22:14.080 --> 00:22:15.430
accelerate


00:22:15.440 --> 00:22:17.110
>> uh to to get faster.


00:22:17.120 --> 00:22:18.789
>> It's easy to get confused though, isn't


00:22:18.799 --> 00:22:19.270
it? Because


00:22:19.280 --> 00:22:21.110
>> it is absolutely


00:22:21.120 --> 00:22:22.710
>> this is an event with a lot of moving


00:22:22.720 --> 00:22:23.430
parts.


00:22:23.440 --> 00:22:25.830
>> It is. Yes. As you'd expect, it's a


00:22:25.840 --> 00:22:27.029
universe after all.


00:22:27.039 --> 00:22:27.430
>> Yeah.


00:22:27.440 --> 00:22:31.750
>> Um but what Peter says is is correct. Um


00:22:31.760 --> 00:22:34.149
because we, as we've just said, there


00:22:34.159 --> 00:22:35.750
are, you know, there are parts of the


00:22:35.760 --> 00:22:38.710
universe well beyond 13.8 8 billion


00:22:38.720 --> 00:22:41.190
light years. Um, which we can't see


00:22:41.200 --> 00:22:42.950
because what we run into is the cosmic


00:22:42.960 --> 00:22:44.390
microwave background radiation, the


00:22:44.400 --> 00:22:46.149
flash of the big bang. So, we know


00:22:46.159 --> 00:22:47.909
there's universe beyond that, but we


00:22:47.919 --> 00:22:49.110
can't see it.


00:22:49.120 --> 00:22:52.470
>> Um, and Peter's suggestion is it


00:22:52.480 --> 00:22:54.310
feasible that the unobservable part of


00:22:54.320 --> 00:22:56.070
the universe contains enough matter to


00:22:56.080 --> 00:22:57.830
act gravitationally on the observable


00:22:57.840 --> 00:23:01.590
universe. Uh, and as and thus causing


00:23:01.600 --> 00:23:02.950
the expansion. It's actually thus


00:23:02.960 --> 00:23:04.230
causing the acceleration of the


00:23:04.240 --> 00:23:06.310
expansion. Uh that is one of the


00:23:06.320 --> 00:23:07.909
theories that people have looked at


00:23:07.919 --> 00:23:10.549
exactly that that are we in a kind of


00:23:10.559 --> 00:23:13.590
local bubble where the density is low


00:23:13.600 --> 00:23:16.950
compared with what we what we what is


00:23:16.960 --> 00:23:19.350
outside the boundary that we can see


00:23:19.360 --> 00:23:21.350
where the density might be higher and


00:23:21.360 --> 00:23:23.110
hence having a gravitational effect on


00:23:23.120 --> 00:23:26.070
our local bubble. Um it's a it's


00:23:26.080 --> 00:23:28.549
certainly a you know a conjecture that


00:23:28.559 --> 00:23:32.149
is raised by uh by astrophysicists and


00:23:32.159 --> 00:23:34.070
cosmologists. So Peter's on the right


00:23:34.080 --> 00:23:36.390
track there. And then question two, the


00:23:36.400 --> 00:23:38.070
same question within the context of the


00:23:38.080 --> 00:23:40.549
multiverse. Could universes other than


00:23:40.559 --> 00:23:42.310
our own gravitationally be


00:23:42.320 --> 00:23:44.070
gravitationally impacting the expansion


00:23:44.080 --> 00:23:47.430
of our universe? And I think um that is


00:23:47.440 --> 00:23:50.630
also something that's considered. Um,


00:23:50.640 --> 00:23:53.110
one of the reasons why people think


00:23:53.120 --> 00:23:55.510
there might be multiverses,


00:23:55.520 --> 00:23:59.270
uh, it is that gravity itself


00:23:59.280 --> 00:24:03.270
is compared with the other three


00:24:03.280 --> 00:24:06.710
fundamental forces in nature, it is


00:24:06.720 --> 00:24:09.510
incredibly weak. So the fundamental


00:24:09.520 --> 00:24:11.750
forces are the strong and weak nuclear


00:24:11.760 --> 00:24:13.750
forces, things that hold atoms together.


00:24:13.760 --> 00:24:15.669
The electromagnetic force causes


00:24:15.679 --> 00:24:18.230
chemical reactions and and photons so


00:24:18.240 --> 00:24:20.230
that we can talk to each other. Those


00:24:20.240 --> 00:24:22.870
are the three uh which are best known.


00:24:22.880 --> 00:24:25.510
Gravity is the fourth fundamental force.


00:24:25.520 --> 00:24:28.630
But it is gazillions of times weaker


00:24:28.640 --> 00:24:30.789
than the other three and some people


00:24:30.799 --> 00:24:33.430
suggest that maybe that is because it is


00:24:33.440 --> 00:24:36.390
leaking into other universes. Hence the


00:24:36.400 --> 00:24:39.350
idea of a multiverse scenario. But that


00:24:39.360 --> 00:24:41.669
is very speculative. We don't have any


00:24:41.679 --> 00:24:43.510
hard evidence that points towards a


00:24:43.520 --> 00:24:47.190
multiverse. But yes, once again, maybe


00:24:47.200 --> 00:24:48.789
there are gravitational influences


00:24:48.799 --> 00:24:50.549
coming from the outside of our universe,


00:24:50.559 --> 00:24:51.669
whatever that means, because the


00:24:51.679 --> 00:24:53.269
universe by definition means everything


00:24:53.279 --> 00:24:56.390
you can observe or or understand. Um, so


00:24:56.400 --> 00:24:59.430
it is possible. So, um, I think Peter's,


00:24:59.440 --> 00:25:01.750
you know, his questions are are well


00:25:01.760 --> 00:25:04.070
well directed. He's on the right track.


00:25:04.080 --> 00:25:07.990
>> Yeah. Uh I think as you said there's no


00:25:08.000 --> 00:25:09.510
direct evidence whatsoever of


00:25:09.520 --> 00:25:12.710
multiverses but we've said it before


00:25:12.720 --> 00:25:14.310
mathematically


00:25:14.320 --> 00:25:15.510
it's plausible. It


00:25:15.520 --> 00:25:18.149
>> it's possible. That's right. Yeah.


00:25:18.159 --> 00:25:19.510
>> A lot of things are mathematically


00:25:19.520 --> 00:25:22.549
possible that you don't see in reality.


00:25:22.559 --> 00:25:24.549
>> And how much of the universe can we not


00:25:24.559 --> 00:25:28.149
see? Is it like 75% or something?


00:25:28.159 --> 00:25:29.029
>> We have no idea.


00:25:29.039 --> 00:25:30.310
>> We don't know. We don't know how big it


00:25:30.320 --> 00:25:30.870
is.


00:25:30.880 --> 00:25:33.029
>> Could be infinite. We don't know.


00:25:33.039 --> 00:25:33.909
>> Yeah. Gosh,


00:25:33.919 --> 00:25:36.710
>> all we know is what we can see.


00:25:36.720 --> 00:25:38.870
>> It's It's crazy town, isn't it? When you


00:25:38.880 --> 00:25:41.510
>> It is. Yeah, it is. Um That's right.


00:25:41.520 --> 00:25:41.909
It's


00:25:41.919 --> 00:25:46.870
>> keeps you in a job.


00:25:46.880 --> 00:25:49.909
>> Yes, it does. Keeps me in a job. That's


00:25:49.919 --> 00:25:50.149
right.


00:25:50.159 --> 00:25:52.470
>> Yeah. Yeah. But that's, you know, that's


00:25:52.480 --> 00:25:53.909
when the critics come out. We got all


00:25:53.919 --> 00:25:56.149
you BS trying to figure out and ladies,


00:25:56.159 --> 00:25:58.070
what's going on? You've been working on


00:25:58.080 --> 00:25:59.669
it for hundreds of years and you still


00:25:59.679 --> 00:26:00.549
don't know the answer.


00:26:00.559 --> 00:26:02.390
>> Still, we still don't know. Um, the good


00:26:02.400 --> 00:26:04.630
the good news is that node is paying me


00:26:04.640 --> 00:26:06.390
now. So that's all right.


00:26:06.400 --> 00:26:09.350
>> So you don't have to worry about that.


00:26:09.360 --> 00:26:11.350
>> It's a costfree analysis now.


00:26:11.360 --> 00:26:12.789
>> There you go. You get it for free.


00:26:12.799 --> 00:26:14.149
That's right, ladies and gentlemen. This


00:26:14.159 --> 00:26:15.590
all comes to you free.


00:26:15.600 --> 00:26:18.710
>> Yes, it does. Um, all right. So I think


00:26:18.720 --> 00:26:21.190
we covered everything there. Um, thank


00:26:21.200 --> 00:26:23.430
you Peter. Great set of questions all


00:26:23.440 --> 00:26:25.750
up. Some um real intrigue in some of


00:26:25.760 --> 00:26:28.630
those as well which uh is really good.


00:26:28.640 --> 00:26:31.110
Uh, but as I've said many times, uh, we


00:26:31.120 --> 00:26:32.950
need some more questions. So, if you can


00:26:32.960 --> 00:26:34.950
get online to our website and click on


00:26:34.960 --> 00:26:36.789
the ask me anything tab at the top of


00:26:36.799 --> 00:26:40.549
our, uh, page, uh, send us text or audio


00:26:40.559 --> 00:26:42.070
questions. We certainly could use some


00:26:42.080 --> 00:26:44.870
more audio questions. We get a lot from


00:26:44.880 --> 00:26:46.710
people who might ask 10 at a time.


00:26:46.720 --> 00:26:49.110
Obviously, we can't run them all


00:26:49.120 --> 00:26:50.710
consecutively, otherwise no one else


00:26:50.720 --> 00:26:52.470
gets a bite. But, uh, if you've thought


00:26:52.480 --> 00:26:54.390
about asking a question and you haven't


00:26:54.400 --> 00:26:56.630
got around to it yet, don't be scared.


00:26:56.640 --> 00:26:58.470
We don't bite. Well, we do bite, but


00:26:58.480 --> 00:27:00.470
don't worry about that. It's harmless.


00:27:00.480 --> 00:27:03.029
We're not venomous. Uh, but you can send


00:27:03.039 --> 00:27:05.590
it in through spaceodcast.com


00:27:05.600 --> 00:27:08.310
or spacenuts.io


00:27:08.320 --> 00:27:10.630
and click on that tab and uh send us


00:27:10.640 --> 00:27:12.710
your question or just a comment. I mean,


00:27:12.720 --> 00:27:14.789
if you want to add a comment, we can


00:27:14.799 --> 00:27:16.230
throw that into the show. It's nice to


00:27:16.240 --> 00:27:18.630
have all these different voices on the


00:27:18.640 --> 00:27:21.510
air. Uh, so yeah, send them into us.


00:27:21.520 --> 00:27:22.710
Don't forget to tell us who you are and


00:27:22.720 --> 00:27:23.669
where you're from. I think I've already


00:27:23.679 --> 00:27:25.750
said that. Uh, we are done, Fred. Thank


00:27:25.760 --> 00:27:27.990
you so very very much.


00:27:28.000 --> 00:27:30.149
>> It's a great pleasure, Andrew. And um I


00:27:30.159 --> 00:27:31.510
hope we'll do it again sometime.


00:27:31.520 --> 00:27:33.669
>> I hope so too. Maybe in a week, maybe


00:27:33.679 --> 00:27:35.750
more, maybe less. You just, you know,


00:27:35.760 --> 00:27:38.950
it's all all to do withuling


00:27:38.960 --> 00:27:42.070
and availability and what our wives are


00:27:42.080 --> 00:27:43.750
doing at any particular time. That's the


00:27:43.760 --> 00:27:45.510
most significant factor.


00:27:45.520 --> 00:27:47.350
>> Thanks, Fred. We'll see you soon.


00:27:47.360 --> 00:27:49.269
>> Cheers for now. Bye-bye.


00:27:49.279 --> 00:27:51.029
>> Uh Professor Fred Watson, astronomer at


00:27:51.039 --> 00:27:53.269
large. Thanks to Hugh in the studio who


00:27:53.279 --> 00:27:55.909
couldn't be with us today because he's


00:27:55.919 --> 00:27:57.430
unobservable.


00:27:57.440 --> 00:27:59.269
And from me, Andrew Dunley, thanks for


00:27:59.279 --> 00:28:01.029
your company. See you on the next


00:28:01.039 --> 00:28:03.110
episode of Space Nuts. Bye-bye.


00:28:03.120 --> 00:28:04.070
>> Space Nuts.


00:28:04.080 --> 00:28:06.149
>> You've been listening to the Space Nuts


00:28:06.159 --> 00:28:08.470
podcast.


00:28:08.480 --> 00:28:11.430
>> Available at Apple Podcasts, Spotify,


00:28:11.440 --> 00:28:14.070
iHeart Radio, or your favorite podcast


00:28:14.080 --> 00:28:16.470
player. You can also stream on demand at


00:28:16.480 --> 00:28:19.350
byes.com. This has been another quality


00:28:19.360 --> 00:28:23.960
podcast production from diets.com.