Starship V3 Flight 12: A Giant Leap for SpaceX | Neptune’s Moon Mystery Unveiled
Sponsor Link:
To secure your online life and save money into the bargain, check out our NordVPN offer - Click Here (https://www.bitesz.com/nordvpn)
Starship V3 is on the pad and tonight's the night — Flight 12 launches the most powerful rocket ever built. Plus: Webb solves a decades-old Neptune mystery, why space debris is quietly corrupting climate science, new doubts cast on DESI's dark energy results, a smarter route to the Moon, and why the galaxy may be full of hellish Venus-twins rather than Earths. All that on Astronomy Daily for Thursday, May 21, 2026.
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/astronomy-daily-space-news-updates--5648921/support (https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/astronomy-daily-space-news-updates--5648921/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss) .
Sponsor Details:
Ensure your online privacy by using NordVPN . To get our special listener deal and save a lot of money, visit You'll be glad you did!
Become a supporter of Astronomy Daily by joining our Supporters Club. Commercial free episodes daily are only a click way... Click Here (https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/astronomy-daily-space-news-updates--5648921/support)
This episode includes AI-generated content.
Episode link: https://play.headliner.app/episode/33387839?utm_source=youtube
Kind: captions
Language: en
00:00:00.240 --> 00:00:02.389
The world's biggest rocket is sitting on
00:00:02.399 --> 00:00:05.030
a launchpad in South Texas right now.
00:00:05.040 --> 00:00:07.349
And tonight, for the first time ever,
00:00:07.359 --> 00:00:09.190
it's going to fly.
00:00:09.200 --> 00:00:12.629
>> Starship version 3, Flight 12. And it is
00:00:12.639 --> 00:00:14.789
absolutely the biggest story in space
00:00:14.799 --> 00:00:15.910
flight today.
00:00:15.920 --> 00:00:17.990
>> We've also got a deep solar system
00:00:18.000 --> 00:00:20.150
mystery wrapped up by the James Webb
00:00:20.160 --> 00:00:22.630
Space Telescope and some genuinely
00:00:22.640 --> 00:00:25.029
unsettling news about what the galaxy
00:00:25.039 --> 00:00:26.550
may be full of.
00:00:26.560 --> 00:00:30.150
>> Spoiler, not very many Earths. I'm Anna.
00:00:30.160 --> 00:00:32.709
>> And I'm Avery. This is Astronomy Daily.
00:00:32.719 --> 00:00:34.630
Today's space news from the universe to
00:00:34.640 --> 00:00:35.430
you.
00:00:35.440 --> 00:00:37.750
>> We've been tracking the Starship V3
00:00:37.760 --> 00:00:39.830
story for a couple of days now. The
00:00:39.840 --> 00:00:42.229
delays, the wet trust rehearsal, the
00:00:42.239 --> 00:00:45.270
OSHA investigation, and today is finally
00:00:45.280 --> 00:00:48.310
the day. The launch window opens at 5:30
00:00:48.320 --> 00:00:50.869
this afternoon, Texas time, and SpaceX
00:00:50.879 --> 00:00:53.830
is going for it. This is flight 12 in
00:00:53.840 --> 00:00:56.310
the Starship program overall, but it's
00:00:56.320 --> 00:00:58.790
the first flight of the V3 design, which
00:00:58.800 --> 00:01:01.110
is by some measures an almost entirely
00:01:01.120 --> 00:01:04.229
new rocket. Elon Musk himself said that
00:01:04.239 --> 00:01:06.630
nearly every part has been redesigned
00:01:06.640 --> 00:01:09.990
compared to V2. The rocket now stands
00:01:10.000 --> 00:01:14.550
124.4 m tall. That's just over 400 ft,
00:01:14.560 --> 00:01:16.870
making it officially the tallest rocket
00:01:16.880 --> 00:01:18.950
humanity has ever built.
00:01:18.960 --> 00:01:20.789
>> And it's not just bigger for the sake of
00:01:20.799 --> 00:01:23.030
it. The big structural change on this
00:01:23.040 --> 00:01:25.670
version is that Starship V3 is designed
00:01:25.680 --> 00:01:27.749
for inorbit refueling for the first
00:01:27.759 --> 00:01:30.469
time. That's the capability that unlocks
00:01:30.479 --> 00:01:32.630
deep space missions to the moon and
00:01:32.640 --> 00:01:34.310
eventually Mars.
00:01:34.320 --> 00:01:36.870
>> NASA is counting on exactly that.
00:01:36.880 --> 00:01:39.109
Starship has been selected as the human
00:01:39.119 --> 00:01:41.510
landing system for the Aremis program.
00:01:41.520 --> 00:01:43.590
The current plan is for a docking test
00:01:43.600 --> 00:01:47.270
in low Earth orbit as early as 2027 with
00:01:47.280 --> 00:01:49.510
a moon surface landing targeted for the
00:01:49.520 --> 00:01:53.350
Aremis 4 mission in 2028. But there's a
00:01:53.360 --> 00:01:55.510
mountain to climb before any of that.
00:01:55.520 --> 00:01:57.830
SpaceX still hasn't sent Starship into
00:01:57.840 --> 00:01:59.830
full orbit. The program has seen
00:01:59.840 --> 00:02:02.469
explosions, delays, and last week a
00:02:02.479 --> 00:02:05.030
contractor working at Starbase in Texas
00:02:05.040 --> 00:02:07.670
died in a fall. The US Occupational
00:02:07.680 --> 00:02:09.430
Safety and Health Administration has
00:02:09.440 --> 00:02:11.110
opened an investigation.
00:02:11.120 --> 00:02:13.670
>> Today's flight profile is suborbital,
00:02:13.680 --> 00:02:15.990
similar to recent missions. The plan is
00:02:16.000 --> 00:02:18.309
to deploy 20 Starlink simulator
00:02:18.319 --> 00:02:20.710
satellites, attempt a single Raptor
00:02:20.720 --> 00:02:23.270
engine relight in space, and test the
00:02:23.280 --> 00:02:25.589
heat shield by deliberately removing one
00:02:25.599 --> 00:02:28.309
tile to measure aerodynamic load on
00:02:28.319 --> 00:02:30.630
neighboring tiles during re-entry.
00:02:30.640 --> 00:02:32.710
>> That tile experiment is actually quite
00:02:32.720 --> 00:02:34.309
clever. You need to understand the
00:02:34.319 --> 00:02:36.710
failure modes before you can fix them.
00:02:36.720 --> 00:02:39.750
>> Weather is sitting around 55% favorable
00:02:39.760 --> 00:02:42.710
right now. Not ideal, but workable. And
00:02:42.720 --> 00:02:44.790
there is a lot writing on this beyond
00:02:44.800 --> 00:02:47.750
engineering pride. SpaceX's planned IPO,
00:02:47.760 --> 00:02:49.750
which could value the company at up to
00:02:49.760 --> 00:02:53.589
$1.75 trillion, would be the largest
00:02:53.599 --> 00:02:56.309
public offering in history. Today's test
00:02:56.319 --> 00:02:59.110
flight is very much in the shop window.
00:02:59.120 --> 00:03:00.710
>> No pressure then.
00:03:00.720 --> 00:03:02.710
>> None whatsoever. We'll have the result
00:03:02.720 --> 00:03:04.869
in tomorrow's episode. Whatever happens
00:03:04.879 --> 00:03:06.790
tonight, it's a pivotal moment for the
00:03:06.800 --> 00:03:08.550
program and for the future of human
00:03:08.560 --> 00:03:09.830
space flight.
00:03:09.840 --> 00:03:12.390
>> Next up today, billions of years ago,
00:03:12.400 --> 00:03:15.030
Neptune had a tidy family of moons.
00:03:15.040 --> 00:03:17.430
Then, a rogue intruder arrived and tore
00:03:17.440 --> 00:03:19.910
everything apart. New research published
00:03:19.920 --> 00:03:22.390
in the journal Science Advances suggests
00:03:22.400 --> 00:03:24.710
that one moon survived the chaos, and
00:03:24.720 --> 00:03:27.670
we've known about it since 1949.
00:03:27.680 --> 00:03:30.390
That moon is Nared, Neptune's third
00:03:30.400 --> 00:03:32.229
largest satellite and one of the
00:03:32.239 --> 00:03:34.710
strangest orbits in the solar system. It
00:03:34.720 --> 00:03:38.309
swings as close as 1.4 million km to
00:03:38.319 --> 00:03:42.309
Neptune and as far away as 9.6 million.
00:03:42.319 --> 00:03:44.630
For comparison, our moon is a pretty
00:03:44.640 --> 00:03:47.110
consistent 384,000
00:03:47.120 --> 00:03:48.869
km from Earth.
00:03:48.879 --> 00:03:50.869
>> For decades, astronomers have known that
00:03:50.879 --> 00:03:53.270
Nared's extreme elliptical orbit was
00:03:53.280 --> 00:03:55.990
unusual, but they couldn't agree on why.
00:03:56.000 --> 00:03:57.670
The leading theory was that it was a
00:03:57.680 --> 00:03:59.830
captured object, something that drifted
00:03:59.840 --> 00:04:01.910
in from the outer solar system and got
00:04:01.920 --> 00:04:04.309
gravitationally trapped. But this new
00:04:04.319 --> 00:04:06.550
study led by Matthew Belellikoff at the
00:04:06.560 --> 00:04:08.630
California Institute of Technology
00:04:08.640 --> 00:04:11.350
strongly rules that out. The team used
00:04:11.360 --> 00:04:13.990
NASA's James Webb Space Telescope to
00:04:14.000 --> 00:04:16.870
study Nari in detail and what they found
00:04:16.880 --> 00:04:19.670
changes the story significantly. Their
00:04:19.680 --> 00:04:21.990
observations are consistent with Narid
00:04:22.000 --> 00:04:24.629
being an original moon of Neptune, one
00:04:24.639 --> 00:04:27.189
that formed right alongside the planet,
00:04:27.199 --> 00:04:29.749
but was thrown into its wild orbit when
00:04:29.759 --> 00:04:32.070
Neptune captured its largest moon,
00:04:32.080 --> 00:04:33.110
Triton.
00:04:33.120 --> 00:04:35.110
>> And Trion's story is quite the tale
00:04:35.120 --> 00:04:37.189
itself. Tryion is thought to have
00:04:37.199 --> 00:04:39.590
originated in the Kyper belt, the frigid
00:04:39.600 --> 00:04:41.510
region beyond Neptune, where objects
00:04:41.520 --> 00:04:44.070
like Pluto live. At some point, Triton
00:04:44.080 --> 00:04:46.230
was captured by Neptune's gravity, and
00:04:46.240 --> 00:04:48.550
the gravitational chaos of that event
00:04:48.560 --> 00:04:51.030
scattered Neptune's original moons onto
00:04:51.040 --> 00:04:53.430
collision courses with each other. Both
00:04:53.440 --> 00:04:54.629
were destroyed.
00:04:54.639 --> 00:04:56.870
>> Neptune's innermost moons are thought to
00:04:56.880 --> 00:04:58.710
be the shattered remnants of those
00:04:58.720 --> 00:05:01.510
originals. Rubble that coalesed after
00:05:01.520 --> 00:05:04.230
Triton's arrival. Married, according to
00:05:04.240 --> 00:05:06.870
this new research, escaped that fate by
00:05:06.880 --> 00:05:09.270
being thrown into its current extreme
00:05:09.280 --> 00:05:12.390
orbit. far enough out to survive, but
00:05:12.400 --> 00:05:14.469
close enough to still be bound to
00:05:14.479 --> 00:05:15.510
Neptune.
00:05:15.520 --> 00:05:17.990
>> As Belellikov puts it, it takes a long
00:05:18.000 --> 00:05:20.230
time to do science. This mystery began
00:05:20.240 --> 00:05:23.350
with Merid's discovery in 1949, and we
00:05:23.360 --> 00:05:25.990
may finally have some answers in 2026,
00:05:26.000 --> 00:05:28.390
thanks to Web. The researchers note that
00:05:28.400 --> 00:05:30.469
this work would simply not be possible
00:05:30.479 --> 00:05:32.629
with any previous telescope. It really
00:05:32.639 --> 00:05:34.790
is a testament to what Web continues to
00:05:34.800 --> 00:05:38.070
deliver. A survivor of 4 billion years
00:05:38.080 --> 00:05:41.189
of cosmic chaos. Not a bad story for a
00:05:41.199 --> 00:05:42.150
Thursday.
00:05:42.160 --> 00:05:43.590
>> Here's a number that should give you
00:05:43.600 --> 00:05:46.710
pause. In 2005, the European Space
00:05:46.720 --> 00:05:49.830
Agency was tracking around 16,000 pieces
00:05:49.840 --> 00:05:53.270
of debris in orbit. By 2026, that number
00:05:53.280 --> 00:05:56.070
has grown to more than 44,000, an
00:05:56.080 --> 00:05:59.350
increase of roughly 180%. And that's
00:05:59.360 --> 00:06:01.670
only what we can track. The vast
00:06:01.680 --> 00:06:04.309
majority of debris is too small to track
00:06:04.319 --> 00:06:07.270
at all. Estimates there are millions of
00:06:07.280 --> 00:06:09.670
fragments out there. Paint flex, bolt
00:06:09.680 --> 00:06:11.749
fragments, shards from old rocket
00:06:11.759 --> 00:06:14.710
stages. Moving at orbital velocities.
00:06:14.720 --> 00:06:16.629
Even something tiny can cause
00:06:16.639 --> 00:06:18.309
catastrophic damage.
00:06:18.319 --> 00:06:20.230
>> But new research is drawing attention to
00:06:20.240 --> 00:06:22.309
a consequence that gets less coverage
00:06:22.319 --> 00:06:24.629
than the collision risk. The scientific
00:06:24.639 --> 00:06:27.430
cost. A study looking at NASA's Earth
00:06:27.440 --> 00:06:30.150
observing satellites, specifically Aqua,
00:06:30.160 --> 00:06:33.510
Terra, and Aura, found that since 2005,
00:06:33.520 --> 00:06:36.070
this fleet has had to execute avoidance
00:06:36.080 --> 00:06:38.629
maneuvers at least 32 times to dodge
00:06:38.639 --> 00:06:39.510
debris.
00:06:39.520 --> 00:06:42.150
>> And those maneuvers aren't free. Not in
00:06:42.160 --> 00:06:44.710
terms of fuel and possibly not in terms
00:06:44.720 --> 00:06:47.029
of data, according to records from the
00:06:47.039 --> 00:06:49.189
land data products evaluations
00:06:49.199 --> 00:06:51.350
assessment. Some of those avoidance
00:06:51.360 --> 00:06:53.749
burns may have corrupted climate data
00:06:53.759 --> 00:06:55.749
during the collection window. You move
00:06:55.759 --> 00:06:57.749
the satellite, the instruments point
00:06:57.759 --> 00:06:59.830
somewhere different, and the record has
00:06:59.840 --> 00:07:01.830
a gap or an artifact.
00:07:01.840 --> 00:07:03.589
>> These satellites were not designed with
00:07:03.599 --> 00:07:05.990
this level of debris in mind. Aqua, for
00:07:06.000 --> 00:07:08.309
instance, has lasted 18 years longer
00:07:08.319 --> 00:07:10.950
than its original design life. It's been
00:07:10.960 --> 00:07:13.029
incredibly productive, but it only has
00:07:13.039 --> 00:07:15.270
so much fuel left. Every avoidance
00:07:15.280 --> 00:07:17.830
maneuver burns some of that reserve. And
00:07:17.840 --> 00:07:19.909
as one insurance analyst put it to
00:07:19.919 --> 00:07:22.710
space.com, even without collisions,
00:07:22.720 --> 00:07:25.670
space debris has an economic cost. Each
00:07:25.680 --> 00:07:27.749
time a satellite has to maneuver to
00:07:27.759 --> 00:07:30.230
avoid a potential collision, it uses
00:07:30.240 --> 00:07:32.469
fuel, which is a finite and precious
00:07:32.479 --> 00:07:34.550
resource. The headline quote from
00:07:34.560 --> 00:07:36.950
researchers is blunt. Things will get
00:07:36.960 --> 00:07:39.110
worse before they get better.
00:07:39.120 --> 00:07:41.029
>> The good news is that two companies have
00:07:41.039 --> 00:07:43.430
announced plans to begin active debris
00:07:43.440 --> 00:07:46.230
removal from orbit in 2027. The
00:07:46.240 --> 00:07:48.469
technology exists, the will and the
00:07:48.479 --> 00:07:51.430
regulation need to catch up quickly.
00:07:51.440 --> 00:07:54.150
>> Next on today's agenda, over the past
00:07:54.160 --> 00:07:57.270
year or so, results from the dark energy
00:07:57.280 --> 00:08:00.070
spectroscopic instrument, DESI, have
00:08:00.080 --> 00:08:02.070
been causing excitement and
00:08:02.080 --> 00:08:04.950
consternation in equal measure. The data
00:08:04.960 --> 00:08:07.749
appeared to hint that dark energy, the
00:08:07.759 --> 00:08:09.670
mysterious force driving the
00:08:09.680 --> 00:08:12.309
accelerating expansion of the universe,
00:08:12.319 --> 00:08:15.670
might be evolving over time, changing in
00:08:15.680 --> 00:08:18.150
strength as the cosmos ages,
00:08:18.160 --> 00:08:20.390
>> which if true would be a genuinely
00:08:20.400 --> 00:08:22.950
enormous deal. The standard cosmological
00:08:22.960 --> 00:08:25.189
model treats dark energy as a fixed
00:08:25.199 --> 00:08:27.909
cosmological constant. If it's changing,
00:08:27.919 --> 00:08:29.830
the model needs to be rebuilt from the
00:08:29.840 --> 00:08:30.869
ground up.
00:08:30.879 --> 00:08:33.589
>> Exactly. But new research published in
00:08:33.599 --> 00:08:36.550
physical reviewd is urging caution.
00:08:36.560 --> 00:08:38.949
Scientists at the Tatada Institute of
00:08:38.959 --> 00:08:41.269
Fundamental Research in Mumbai have
00:08:41.279 --> 00:08:43.909
found something subtle. A small but
00:08:43.919 --> 00:08:46.470
significant mismatch between two key
00:08:46.480 --> 00:08:49.190
data sets used to measure dark energies
00:08:49.200 --> 00:08:51.910
properties. Supernova brightness data
00:08:51.920 --> 00:08:54.949
and Barryon acoustic oscillations which
00:08:54.959 --> 00:08:57.030
are essentially ripples in the
00:08:57.040 --> 00:08:59.190
distribution of galaxies across the
00:08:59.200 --> 00:09:01.269
universe. And the mismatch matters
00:09:01.279 --> 00:09:03.430
because the DEESI results that pointed
00:09:03.440 --> 00:09:05.750
to evolving dark energy relied on
00:09:05.760 --> 00:09:08.150
combining those two data sets. If they
00:09:08.160 --> 00:09:10.230
aren't mutually consistent, if there's a
00:09:10.240 --> 00:09:11.990
small but real discrepancy in what
00:09:12.000 --> 00:09:13.750
they're measuring, then the apparent
00:09:13.760 --> 00:09:15.670
signal of evolving dark energy could be
00:09:15.680 --> 00:09:17.990
a systematic artifact rather than a
00:09:18.000 --> 00:09:20.310
genuine physical phenomenon. The
00:09:20.320 --> 00:09:22.790
researchers traced the mismatch back to
00:09:22.800 --> 00:09:25.269
a potential violation of what's called
00:09:25.279 --> 00:09:28.550
the cosmic distance duality relation, a
00:09:28.560 --> 00:09:31.350
fundamental geometric relationship that
00:09:31.360 --> 00:09:33.829
underpins how we calculate distances in
00:09:33.839 --> 00:09:36.550
the universe. If that relation is being
00:09:36.560 --> 00:09:38.790
violated or if there are subtle
00:09:38.800 --> 00:09:41.030
calibration errors in the data sets,
00:09:41.040 --> 00:09:43.269
then the apparent evolution of dark
00:09:43.279 --> 00:09:45.829
energy may simply disappear.
00:09:45.839 --> 00:09:47.829
>> What does this mean in practical terms?
00:09:47.839 --> 00:09:50.470
It means we don't know yet. This paper
00:09:50.480 --> 00:09:53.190
doesn't prove dark energy is constant.
00:09:53.200 --> 00:09:55.910
It just raises a serious methodological
00:09:55.920 --> 00:09:59.110
flag. Science is working exactly as it
00:09:59.120 --> 00:10:01.430
should. Extraordinary claims get
00:10:01.440 --> 00:10:04.070
extraordinary scrutiny. More data from
00:10:04.080 --> 00:10:06.949
Desi's third release and from Uklid
00:10:06.959 --> 00:10:09.190
mission should help clarify things later
00:10:09.200 --> 00:10:10.150
this year.
00:10:10.160 --> 00:10:11.910
>> The universe remains stubbornly
00:10:11.920 --> 00:10:13.190
mysterious,
00:10:13.200 --> 00:10:15.430
>> which is honestly what keeps us in a
00:10:15.440 --> 00:10:17.670
job. Now, here's a question that sounds
00:10:17.680 --> 00:10:19.190
simple, but turns out to be
00:10:19.200 --> 00:10:21.670
extraordinarily complex. What's the most
00:10:21.680 --> 00:10:23.350
efficient way to get from Earth to the
00:10:23.360 --> 00:10:24.150
moon?
00:10:24.160 --> 00:10:26.790
>> I mean, you point the rocket at it.
00:10:26.800 --> 00:10:28.949
>> You'd think, right? But no, because in
00:10:28.959 --> 00:10:31.190
space flight, the most direct path is
00:10:31.200 --> 00:10:33.430
almost never the most efficient one. And
00:10:33.440 --> 00:10:34.870
the new study published in the journal
00:10:34.880 --> 00:10:36.949
Astronamics has found the trajectory to
00:10:36.959 --> 00:10:38.790
the moon that is better than any route
00:10:38.800 --> 00:10:40.389
previously described in the scientific
00:10:40.399 --> 00:10:41.269
literature.
00:10:41.279 --> 00:10:42.550
>> How much better?
00:10:42.560 --> 00:10:46.470
>> The new route uses 58.8 8 m/s less fuel,
00:10:46.480 --> 00:10:49.030
what engineers call delta V, compared to
00:10:49.040 --> 00:10:51.269
the previous best known path. That might
00:10:51.279 --> 00:10:53.910
sound tiny, but consider the total fuel
00:10:53.920 --> 00:10:55.750
budget for an Earth to moon transfer is
00:10:55.760 --> 00:10:57.829
around 3,343
00:10:57.839 --> 00:11:01.269
m/s. Shave nearly 60 off that and you've
00:11:01.279 --> 00:11:03.670
made a real difference. Every meter/s
00:11:03.680 --> 00:11:05.990
saved is, as the researchers put it, a
00:11:06.000 --> 00:11:08.389
massive amount of fuel consumption.
00:11:08.399 --> 00:11:10.790
>> So, how did they find it? The team from
00:11:10.800 --> 00:11:13.030
the universities of Kolimbra, Porto and
00:11:13.040 --> 00:11:15.190
Evora in Portugal and the University of
00:11:15.200 --> 00:11:17.750
Sa Paulo in Brazil used a mathematical
00:11:17.760 --> 00:11:19.590
approach called the theory of functional
00:11:19.600 --> 00:11:21.829
connections. It dramatically reduces the
00:11:21.839 --> 00:11:23.350
computing power needed to simulate
00:11:23.360 --> 00:11:25.829
trajectories which let them test around
00:11:25.839 --> 00:11:27.990
30 million different routes. Previous
00:11:28.000 --> 00:11:31.269
studies had managed around 280,000.
00:11:31.279 --> 00:11:33.430
>> That's an enormous leap in the search
00:11:33.440 --> 00:11:34.230
space.
00:11:34.240 --> 00:11:36.310
>> And it paid off. The most efficient
00:11:36.320 --> 00:11:38.470
route they found is counterintuitive.
00:11:38.480 --> 00:11:40.230
Instead of heading more or less directly
00:11:40.240 --> 00:11:42.389
toward the moon, the spacecraft first
00:11:42.399 --> 00:11:44.470
swings toward a point called the L1
00:11:44.480 --> 00:11:46.870
Lrange plane, the gravitational balance
00:11:46.880 --> 00:11:48.949
point between Earth and the moon about
00:11:48.959 --> 00:11:51.829
85% of the way there. It enters a stable
00:11:51.839 --> 00:11:54.550
orbital pathway around L1, then departs
00:11:54.560 --> 00:11:56.710
on an unstable pathway that transitions
00:11:56.720 --> 00:11:58.470
it into lunar orbit,
00:11:58.480 --> 00:12:00.949
>> essentially using the moon's own gravity
00:12:00.959 --> 00:12:03.269
as part of the propulsion system.
00:12:03.279 --> 00:12:05.829
>> Exactly. The team also notes that the L1
00:12:05.839 --> 00:12:07.670
point maintains constant line of sight
00:12:07.680 --> 00:12:09.750
with Earth, which means communication is
00:12:09.760 --> 00:12:11.590
uninterrupted throughout the journey.
00:12:11.600 --> 00:12:13.350
And crucially, this method can be
00:12:13.360 --> 00:12:15.590
adapted. You could use it for any planet
00:12:15.600 --> 00:12:17.670
moon system or any orbital transfer
00:12:17.680 --> 00:12:19.829
problem. As a researcher say, the
00:12:19.839 --> 00:12:21.829
systematic analysis they developed could
00:12:21.839 --> 00:12:23.670
be adopted much more widely going
00:12:23.680 --> 00:12:24.710
forward.
00:12:24.720 --> 00:12:27.509
>> Small savings scaled across dozens of
00:12:27.519 --> 00:12:30.310
future Artemis missions. That adds up to
00:12:30.320 --> 00:12:32.150
a lot of rocket fuel
00:12:32.160 --> 00:12:33.990
>> and a lot of money.
00:12:34.000 --> 00:12:36.069
>> Speaking of money, here's a way you can
00:12:36.079 --> 00:12:38.710
save heaps and secure your online life.
00:12:38.720 --> 00:12:41.509
Simply do what we did and get NordVPN.
00:12:41.519 --> 00:12:43.430
To take advantage of our very special
00:12:43.440 --> 00:12:45.350
offer, just look for the link in the
00:12:45.360 --> 00:12:46.230
show notes.
00:12:46.240 --> 00:12:48.150
>> Stay safe online and away from prying
00:12:48.160 --> 00:12:50.629
eyes. Get NordVPN.
00:12:50.639 --> 00:12:53.190
>> All right, on to our next story. And
00:12:53.200 --> 00:12:55.829
this one will surprise many. If you've
00:12:55.839 --> 00:12:58.310
ever looked up at the night sky and felt
00:12:58.320 --> 00:13:01.190
reassured that the galaxy must be full
00:13:01.200 --> 00:13:03.910
of Earth's worlds with oceans,
00:13:03.920 --> 00:13:07.030
atmospheres, and the potential for life.
00:13:07.040 --> 00:13:08.870
New research from the European
00:13:08.880 --> 00:13:11.910
Geocsciences Union Conference in Vienna
00:13:11.920 --> 00:13:13.590
may give you pause.
00:13:13.600 --> 00:13:15.910
>> That's not the most comforting preamble.
00:13:15.920 --> 00:13:18.150
Preliminary results presented by Shaun
00:13:18.160 --> 00:13:20.389
Jordan, a post-doal researcher at
00:13:20.399 --> 00:13:23.509
ETHZurich, suggest that our galaxy may
00:13:23.519 --> 00:13:25.750
be filled with a far greater number of
00:13:25.760 --> 00:13:28.150
Venuslike worlds than true Earth
00:13:28.160 --> 00:13:30.790
analoges, and that this might simply be
00:13:30.800 --> 00:13:33.110
how rocky planet formation works.
00:13:33.120 --> 00:13:34.710
>> Walk us through the science.
00:13:34.720 --> 00:13:36.790
>> When a rocky planet forms, it goes
00:13:36.800 --> 00:13:38.870
through what's called a magma ocean
00:13:38.880 --> 00:13:41.590
phase. Essentially, the entire surface
00:13:41.600 --> 00:13:44.230
is molten. As it cools, the atmosphere
00:13:44.240 --> 00:13:46.389
it develops heavily depends on its
00:13:46.399 --> 00:13:48.389
chemistry and its distance from its
00:13:48.399 --> 00:13:51.190
star. Jordan and colleagues argue that
00:13:51.200 --> 00:13:53.190
it's actually quite straightforward to
00:13:53.200 --> 00:13:55.509
end up with a carbon dioxide dominated
00:13:55.519 --> 00:13:59.030
atmosphere. Thick, hot, crushing Venus
00:13:59.040 --> 00:14:01.430
style after that cooling phase. Getting
00:14:01.440 --> 00:14:03.750
to an Earthlike nitrogen oxygen
00:14:03.760 --> 00:14:05.509
atmosphere is harder.
00:14:05.519 --> 00:14:07.269
>> Meaning a Venus outcome might be the
00:14:07.279 --> 00:14:09.189
path of least resistance.
00:14:09.199 --> 00:14:11.430
>> That's the implication. And there's a
00:14:11.440 --> 00:14:13.509
philosophical reframe buried in here,
00:14:13.519 --> 00:14:16.310
too. Jordan suggests that Venus may not
00:14:16.320 --> 00:14:18.949
have gone wrong. It may simply have been
00:14:18.959 --> 00:14:21.350
born that way. A planet that came out of
00:14:21.360 --> 00:14:23.990
its magma ocean phase looking exactly
00:14:24.000 --> 00:14:26.389
like Venus does today without ever
00:14:26.399 --> 00:14:28.790
having oceans or a temperate climate.
00:14:28.800 --> 00:14:31.189
>> How many exenus candidates are we
00:14:31.199 --> 00:14:32.550
actually talking about?
00:14:32.560 --> 00:14:35.110
>> At least a few dozen rocky exoplanets
00:14:35.120 --> 00:14:37.670
are considered potential Venus analoges,
00:14:37.680 --> 00:14:39.990
though none have been confirmed as such.
00:14:40.000 --> 00:14:41.829
We don't yet have the atmospheric
00:14:41.839 --> 00:14:44.069
characterization tools to be certain.
00:14:44.079 --> 00:14:46.150
The challenge is that a Venuslike
00:14:46.160 --> 00:14:48.550
atmosphere, all those sulfuric acid
00:14:48.560 --> 00:14:50.870
clouds, looks very similar to a
00:14:50.880 --> 00:14:52.790
featureless atmosphere in our current
00:14:52.800 --> 00:14:53.910
observations.
00:14:53.920 --> 00:14:55.750
>> There's a telling phrase in the coverage
00:14:55.760 --> 00:14:58.230
of this research that our own Venus has
00:14:58.240 --> 00:14:59.829
been described as criminally
00:14:59.839 --> 00:15:02.629
underexplored. Only one mission has sent
00:15:02.639 --> 00:15:04.790
a lander since the Soviet program in the
00:15:04.800 --> 00:15:05.590
80s.
00:15:05.600 --> 00:15:07.910
>> That's the awkward irony. We are looking
00:15:07.920 --> 00:15:10.790
for Venus twins across the galaxy while
00:15:10.800 --> 00:15:12.870
barely understanding the one we have
00:15:12.880 --> 00:15:15.829
next door. ESA's Envision mission and
00:15:15.839 --> 00:15:18.150
NASA's Da Vinci program are both in
00:15:18.160 --> 00:15:20.230
development, and they can't come soon
00:15:20.240 --> 00:15:23.350
enough. Our nearest twin, the cautionary
00:15:23.360 --> 00:15:25.990
tale, deserves a much closer look.
00:15:26.000 --> 00:15:28.310
>> From a habitable paradise candidate to
00:15:28.320 --> 00:15:30.870
the galaxy's most common world, quite
00:15:30.880 --> 00:15:32.069
the demotion.
00:15:32.079 --> 00:15:34.550
>> Science rarely flatters our assumptions.
00:15:34.560 --> 00:15:36.870
Before we head out, a quick look at the
00:15:36.880 --> 00:15:38.470
sky for our southern hemisphere
00:15:38.480 --> 00:15:41.110
listeners, particularly in Australia and
00:15:41.120 --> 00:15:43.670
New Zealand. This week is a beautiful
00:15:43.680 --> 00:15:46.069
time to watch the evening sky. Jupiter
00:15:46.079 --> 00:15:48.310
is blazing brightly in the west after
00:15:48.320 --> 00:15:50.790
sunset, and the waxing moon is sliding
00:15:50.800 --> 00:15:52.949
past it over the next couple of nights.
00:15:52.959 --> 00:15:54.710
Tonight, they're particularly close
00:15:54.720 --> 00:15:57.030
together, making for a stunning naked
00:15:57.040 --> 00:15:57.990
eye pairing.
00:15:58.000 --> 00:16:00.150
>> No equipment needed. Just step outside
00:16:00.160 --> 00:16:02.710
about 30 to 45 minutes after sunset.
00:16:02.720 --> 00:16:04.790
Look west and you'll see the moon and
00:16:04.800 --> 00:16:06.870
the brightest star near it. That's
00:16:06.880 --> 00:16:08.949
Jupiter. It's one of those simple
00:16:08.959 --> 00:16:10.629
wonderful reminders that the solar
00:16:10.639 --> 00:16:13.189
system is right there every clear night.
00:16:13.199 --> 00:16:15.269
>> Cloud-free skies to all of you.
00:16:15.279 --> 00:16:17.350
>> That is Astronomy Daily for Thursday,
00:16:17.360 --> 00:16:20.470
May 21st, 2026. Six stories from the
00:16:20.480 --> 00:16:22.389
launchpad in Texas to the farthest
00:16:22.399 --> 00:16:24.069
reaches of Neptune's battered moon
00:16:24.079 --> 00:16:24.790
system.
00:16:24.800 --> 00:16:27.269
>> And the Starship result, whatever it is,
00:16:27.279 --> 00:16:29.350
we'll have it for you tomorrow. If you
00:16:29.360 --> 00:16:30.949
enjoyed the show, please take a moment
00:16:30.959 --> 00:16:32.710
to subscribe and leave a rating wherever
00:16:32.720 --> 00:16:34.790
you get your podcast. It genuinely makes
00:16:34.800 --> 00:16:35.910
a difference.
00:16:35.920 --> 00:16:39.829
>> You can find us at astronomyaily.io
00:16:39.839 --> 00:16:43.590
and on socials at astroaily pod. We're
00:16:43.600 --> 00:16:47.110
part of the byes.com podcast network.
00:16:47.120 --> 00:16:49.670
>> Until tomorrow, keep looking up.
00:16:49.680 --> 00:16:54.790
>> Clear skies.
00:16:54.800 --> 00:17:01.990
told
00:17:02.000 --> 00:17:09.990
stories told
00:17:10.000 --> 00:17:12.640
stories