Dec. 21, 2025

Gravitational Waves, Cosmic What-Ifs & Dark Energy Dilemmas | Space Nuts: Astronomy Insights &...

Gravitational Waves, Cosmic What-Ifs & Dark Energy Dilemmas | Space Nuts: Astronomy Insights &...
The player is loading ...
Gravitational Waves, Cosmic What-Ifs & Dark Energy Dilemmas | Space Nuts: Astronomy Insights &...

Archived Insights: Gravitational Waves, Earth's Fate, and Dark Energy

In this special episode of Space Nuts , hosts Andrew Dunkley and Professor Fred Watson take a trip down memory lane, revisiting some of the most compelling questions from their Q&A sessions. This episode features discussions on gravitational waves produced by the Big Bang, a thought-provoking "what if" scenario regarding the Earth's fate if the Sun never dies, and a deep dive into the enigmatic nature of dark energy.

Episode Highlights:

- Gravitational Waves and the Big Bang: Andrew and Fred tackle a listener's inquiry about whether the Big Bang generated gravitational waves and how these might be detected alongside the cosmic microwave background radiation.

- The Fate of Earth: A "what if" question explores the implications of an immortal Sun and how Earth's environment might evolve, leading to fascinating speculations about tidal locking and atmospheric changes.

- Time and Dark Energy: The hosts discuss a listener's theory proposing a connection between time and dark energy, addressing the complexities of cosmic expansion and the role of gravity in shaping our understanding of the universe.

For more Space Nuts, including our continuously updating newsfeed and to listen to all our episodes, visit our website. (https://www.spacenutspodcast.com/) Follow us on social media at SpaceNutsPod on Facebook, X, YouTube Music Music, Tumblr, Instagram, and TikTok. We love engaging with our community, so be sure to drop us a message or comment on your favorite platform.

If you’d like to help support Space Nuts and join our growing family of insiders for commercial-free episodes and more, visit spacenutspodcast.com/about (https://www.spacenutspodcast.com/about) .

Stay curious, keep looking up, and join us next time for more stellar insights and cosmic wonders. Until then, clear skies and happy stargazing.


Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/space-nuts-astronomy-insights-cosmic-discoveries--2631155/support (https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/space-nuts-astronomy-insights-cosmic-discoveries--2631155/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss) .

Episode link: https://play.headliner.app/episode/30776545?utm_source=youtube

WEBVTT
Kind: captions
Language: en

00:00:00.080 --> 00:00:01.750
While the world takes a little bit of a


00:00:01.760 --> 00:00:03.669
rest over the Christmas New Year period,


00:00:03.679 --> 00:00:05.910
we thought we would, too. But we're not


00:00:05.920 --> 00:00:07.829
going to leave you hanging. We've dug


00:00:07.839 --> 00:00:10.070
into the archives and found a few of the


00:00:10.080 --> 00:00:13.190
biggest episodes of recent times. So,


00:00:13.200 --> 00:00:15.350
sit back and enjoy those. And we'll be


00:00:15.360 --> 00:00:18.390
back with new episodes of Space Nuts


00:00:18.400 --> 00:00:19.990
probably in the middle of January. See


00:00:20.000 --> 00:00:22.790
you then. Space Nuts. Hi there. Thanks


00:00:22.800 --> 00:00:25.670
for joining us. This is Space Nuts Q&A.


00:00:25.680 --> 00:00:28.390
My name is Andrew Dunley, your host. And


00:00:28.400 --> 00:00:30.230
coming up on this episode, we got a


00:00:30.240 --> 00:00:32.389
question about gravitational waves and


00:00:32.399 --> 00:00:34.630
the big bang. We're also going to uh


00:00:34.640 --> 00:00:36.310
look at a what if question. Love the


00:00:36.320 --> 00:00:39.030
what if questions. Uh which is asking


00:00:39.040 --> 00:00:41.990
about the life of Earth. Not life on


00:00:42.000 --> 00:00:45.510
Earth, the life of Earth if the sun


00:00:45.520 --> 00:00:49.750
never died. Interesting uh angle. And


00:00:49.760 --> 00:00:52.389
we're also going to look at uh time and


00:00:52.399 --> 00:00:55.430
dark energy. That's all coming up on the


00:00:55.440 --> 00:00:58.389
Q&A edition of Space Nuts.


00:00:58.399 --> 00:01:03.270
>> 15 seconds. Guidance is internal. 10 9


00:01:03.280 --> 00:01:05.030
Ignition sequence start.


00:01:05.040 --> 00:01:05.910
>> Space Nuts.


00:01:05.920 --> 00:01:08.469
>> 5 4 3 2


00:01:08.479 --> 00:01:10.870
>> 1 2 3 4 5 5 4 3 2 1


00:01:10.880 --> 00:01:12.070
>> Space Nuts.


00:01:12.080 --> 00:01:14.469
>> Astronauts report. It feels good.


00:01:14.479 --> 00:01:16.070
>> And joining me once again is Professor


00:01:16.080 --> 00:01:17.830
Fred Watson, astronomer at large. Hello


00:01:17.840 --> 00:01:18.149
Fred.


00:01:18.159 --> 00:01:20.310
>> Hi Andrew. How are you doing?


00:01:20.320 --> 00:01:22.390
>> I'm doing as much as I can.


00:01:22.400 --> 00:01:24.789
>> Good. Good. Good, good to be Q&A with


00:01:24.799 --> 00:01:25.830
you.


00:01:25.840 --> 00:01:28.550
>> Yes, you too. Um, shall we get stuck


00:01:28.560 --> 00:01:29.109
straight in?


00:01:29.119 --> 00:01:30.550
>> Why not? Yes, why not?


00:01:30.560 --> 00:01:32.950
>> All right. Uh, our first question comes


00:01:32.960 --> 00:01:35.030
I'm not sure if it's Bo or Boa. I'll


00:01:35.040 --> 00:01:36.390
have to listen more carefully. Here we


00:01:36.400 --> 00:01:38.469
go.


00:01:38.479 --> 00:01:40.870
>> Hello, Fred and Andrew. Is Bo here from


00:01:40.880 --> 00:01:43.510
Melbourne? I hope you're well. I have a


00:01:43.520 --> 00:01:46.149
question for you, and it is not about


00:01:46.159 --> 00:01:48.789
dark energy, nor it is about dark


00:01:48.799 --> 00:01:50.950
matter, but it is about gravitational


00:01:50.960 --> 00:01:54.469
waves. It's a straightforward question.


00:01:54.479 --> 00:01:56.870
Did the big bang produce gravitational


00:01:56.880 --> 00:01:59.429
waves? As we understand it,


00:01:59.439 --> 00:02:01.429
gravitational waves are generated when


00:02:01.439 --> 00:02:03.670
two massive bodies such as neutron stars


00:02:03.680 --> 00:02:06.389
and black holes collided each other and


00:02:06.399 --> 00:02:08.150
cause that ripple in the fabric of


00:02:08.160 --> 00:02:10.070
spacetime.


00:02:10.080 --> 00:02:14.309
But when the universe as just began uh


00:02:14.319 --> 00:02:17.430
in infinite density and so forth when it


00:02:17.440 --> 00:02:20.070
came into existence via the big bang did


00:02:20.080 --> 00:02:23.830
it produce gravitational waves or echoes


00:02:23.840 --> 00:02:26.309
and can we detect those echoes in space


00:02:26.319 --> 00:02:28.790
and time very much like the cosmic


00:02:28.800 --> 00:02:30.470
microwave background radiation that we


00:02:30.480 --> 00:02:33.110
see today. Anyway, I hope that makes


00:02:33.120 --> 00:02:35.030
sense. I'd love to hear your answer.


00:02:35.040 --> 00:02:36.229
Thank you very much.


00:02:36.239 --> 00:02:38.309
>> Thank you Boa. Um that's a good


00:02:38.319 --> 00:02:40.150
question. I you know we talk about the


00:02:40.160 --> 00:02:41.990
big bang a lot. We get a lot of


00:02:42.000 --> 00:02:46.710
questions about it. Uh and I mean it was


00:02:46.720 --> 00:02:51.350
a a massive event. We don't know why. We


00:02:51.360 --> 00:02:55.110
don't know a lot but uh we know we can


00:02:55.120 --> 00:02:57.030
see that it happened through the cosmic


00:02:57.040 --> 00:02:58.869
microwave background radiation that's


00:02:58.879 --> 00:03:02.070
still evident today. But gravitational


00:03:02.080 --> 00:03:06.070
waves would I mean if the universe


00:03:06.080 --> 00:03:07.990
didn't exist at the moment of the big


00:03:08.000 --> 00:03:10.229
bang and was being created as a


00:03:10.239 --> 00:03:12.550
consequence of that


00:03:12.560 --> 00:03:14.869
I'm not sure gravitational waves could


00:03:14.879 --> 00:03:16.790
have happened the way we understand them


00:03:16.800 --> 00:03:20.869
with other events in our universe. So um


00:03:20.879 --> 00:03:24.550
yeah I'm not sure about this one. So um


00:03:24.560 --> 00:03:27.910
the the thing is Andrew um the yes the


00:03:27.920 --> 00:03:30.949
universe was created in that instant uh


00:03:30.959 --> 00:03:35.110
of the big bang um and so you're right


00:03:35.120 --> 00:03:37.110
um you know in the conventional theory


00:03:37.120 --> 00:03:40.229
standard Einsteinian physics we we


00:03:40.239 --> 00:03:42.309
imagine that time and space didn't exist


00:03:42.319 --> 00:03:45.270
before the big bang so uh you've got to


00:03:45.280 --> 00:03:47.350
create some space for your gravitational


00:03:47.360 --> 00:03:50.470
waves to go through uh which is kind of


00:03:50.480 --> 00:03:53.990
thinking yeah and so um And so yes,


00:03:54.000 --> 00:03:56.470
there was the instant of the big bang


00:03:56.480 --> 00:03:59.910
that created this singularity in time


00:03:59.920 --> 00:04:03.750
and space followed by this period was it


00:04:03.760 --> 00:04:06.390
10us 33 of a second something like that


00:04:06.400 --> 00:04:09.509
in duration uh which we call the period


00:04:09.519 --> 00:04:12.949
of inflation when the when the expansion


00:04:12.959 --> 00:04:16.710
really took hold uh and it you know the


00:04:16.720 --> 00:04:18.310
universe went from the size of a


00:04:18.320 --> 00:04:20.310
football to the size of a galaxy in


00:04:20.320 --> 00:04:24.790
something like 10 theus 33 a second and


00:04:24.800 --> 00:04:28.390
uh the thinking is and I'm actually


00:04:28.400 --> 00:04:30.550
dragging this up from reading a few


00:04:30.560 --> 00:04:33.909
years ago but but that yes that per that


00:04:33.919 --> 00:04:36.790
inflationary period as we call it would


00:04:36.800 --> 00:04:40.550
have created gravitational waves.


00:04:40.560 --> 00:04:44.629
>> Uhhuh. Uh or maybe a gravitational wave


00:04:44.639 --> 00:04:45.110
but


00:04:45.120 --> 00:04:46.870
>> I was about to say


00:04:46.880 --> 00:04:48.150
>> maybe just one big one


00:04:48.160 --> 00:04:48.710
>> that's right


00:04:48.720 --> 00:04:52.469
>> at that point. But the the issue is um


00:04:52.479 --> 00:04:56.150
that uh it is a gravitational wave of


00:04:56.160 --> 00:04:59.510
very very very low frequency.


00:04:59.520 --> 00:05:02.469
So um the gravitational waves that we


00:05:02.479 --> 00:05:04.550
get from colliding neutron stars for


00:05:04.560 --> 00:05:10.469
example uh they produce waves which are


00:05:10.479 --> 00:05:12.150
basically have a frequency which is in


00:05:12.160 --> 00:05:14.870
the audio range which is why we can you


00:05:14.880 --> 00:05:17.350
know turn those uh gravitational wave


00:05:17.360 --> 00:05:20.070
signals into an audio signal very easily


00:05:20.080 --> 00:05:22.150
after you've amplified it up a bit and


00:05:22.160 --> 00:05:24.870
after LIGO has done its magic on it and


00:05:24.880 --> 00:05:27.909
that's where we get this chirp signal as


00:05:27.919 --> 00:05:30.629
as two neutron stars or whatever merge


00:05:30.639 --> 00:05:33.590
together uh and and eventually that


00:05:33.600 --> 00:05:35.029
because they're spinning ever ever ever


00:05:35.039 --> 00:05:37.430
more rapidly uh and so the frequency


00:05:37.440 --> 00:05:38.950
goes up of the waves that are being


00:05:38.960 --> 00:05:41.749
emitted and and then stop uh at a high


00:05:41.759 --> 00:05:43.350
point because that's where they've co


00:05:43.360 --> 00:05:47.110
coalesed into a single object. Um now


00:05:47.120 --> 00:05:49.510
you can think of those


00:05:49.520 --> 00:05:54.070
uh audio frequencies. Uh you know we


00:05:54.080 --> 00:05:56.150
might talk about something like 500 htz


00:05:56.160 --> 00:05:59.909
as an audio frequency or you could take


00:05:59.919 --> 00:06:03.670
440 htz as u the frequency of of um the


00:06:03.680 --> 00:06:06.710
standard a note in the in the musical


00:06:06.720 --> 00:06:11.189
spectrum. Um so if let's stick with 500


00:06:11.199 --> 00:06:14.070
because that's an easy one. Uh so the


00:06:14.080 --> 00:06:16.710
the the period of time between one peak


00:06:16.720 --> 00:06:20.469
of the of the wave and the next uh is


00:06:20.479 --> 00:06:23.990
1/500th of a second. And so if you think


00:06:24.000 --> 00:06:27.029
that's the inter interval of time of a


00:06:27.039 --> 00:06:29.990
characteristic gravitational wave from


00:06:30.000 --> 00:06:33.430
uh two colliding objects. Now the issue


00:06:33.440 --> 00:06:37.510
as I understand it is that the interval


00:06:37.520 --> 00:06:41.430
between peaks in a gravitational wave uh


00:06:41.440 --> 00:06:44.070
produced by inflation


00:06:44.080 --> 00:06:46.469
is about the same as the age of the


00:06:46.479 --> 00:06:50.309
universe now. It's not uh 1/500th of a


00:06:50.319 --> 00:06:53.430
second. It's you know several several


00:06:53.440 --> 00:06:57.430
billion years u perhaps even tens of


00:06:57.440 --> 00:06:59.110
billions of years. It's quite a while


00:06:59.120 --> 00:07:02.070
since I read up on this. So, so normal


00:07:02.080 --> 00:07:04.629
gravitational wave technology is simply


00:07:04.639 --> 00:07:06.629
not equipped to detect these low


00:07:06.639 --> 00:07:08.390
frequency


00:07:08.400 --> 00:07:10.550
ultra ultra low frequency gravitational


00:07:10.560 --> 00:07:12.469
waves, but there might be other ways of


00:07:12.479 --> 00:07:15.029
seeing them. Uh, and one of the things


00:07:15.039 --> 00:07:17.749
people have looked for, uh, and I'm not


00:07:17.759 --> 00:07:21.990
really very well up on this, but there


00:07:22.000 --> 00:07:24.070
is a potential


00:07:24.080 --> 00:07:26.150
signal in the cosmic microwave


00:07:26.160 --> 00:07:28.230
background radiation that the flash of


00:07:28.240 --> 00:07:30.390
the Big Bang that we see that that gives


00:07:30.400 --> 00:07:33.189
us what the universe looked like 380,000


00:07:33.199 --> 00:07:34.710
years after the Big Bang. That's that's


00:07:34.720 --> 00:07:38.150
what we're seeing there. that um that


00:07:38.160 --> 00:07:41.350
radiation uh contains information not


00:07:41.360 --> 00:07:43.909
just on its brightness but also on its


00:07:43.919 --> 00:07:45.830
polarization


00:07:45.840 --> 00:07:47.990
uh you know that radiation is polarized


00:07:48.000 --> 00:07:50.790
a bit like light can be polarized and


00:07:50.800 --> 00:07:53.990
I'm not really drawing the drawing the


00:07:54.000 --> 00:07:55.830
links very strongly here but I


00:07:55.840 --> 00:07:58.230
understand that there are links between


00:07:58.240 --> 00:08:00.150
very low frequency gravitational waves


00:08:00.160 --> 00:08:02.390
and that polarization signal so it's one


00:08:02.400 --> 00:08:04.070
of the things that people are looking


00:08:04.080 --> 00:08:05.909
for to try and detect this this


00:08:05.919 --> 00:08:08.710
polarization uh within the cosmic


00:08:08.720 --> 00:08:10.629
microwave background radiation. So it's


00:08:10.639 --> 00:08:13.110
not at all a dough question uh but it's


00:08:13.120 --> 00:08:15.430
quite a complex answer.


00:08:15.440 --> 00:08:18.309
>> Yeah. Yeah. But the the big bang itself


00:08:18.319 --> 00:08:22.390
could have initially been one you know


00:08:22.400 --> 00:08:24.390
created one gravitational wave.


00:08:24.400 --> 00:08:25.830
>> Yes. That's right. Yeah. That's more or


00:08:25.840 --> 00:08:26.550
less it.


00:08:26.560 --> 00:08:28.550
>> Yeah.


00:08:28.560 --> 00:08:30.790
>> There you go. Um you're right on the


00:08:30.800 --> 00:08:33.110
money. It's just a matter of finding a


00:08:33.120 --> 00:08:36.070
way of seeing them. Would they Is it


00:08:36.080 --> 00:08:38.230
possible these gravitational waves still


00:08:38.240 --> 00:08:39.670
bouncing around like the cosmic


00:08:39.680 --> 00:08:41.110
microwave background radiation?


00:08:41.120 --> 00:08:43.670
>> Well, yes. Yes. But um at such a low


00:08:43.680 --> 00:08:45.110
frequency that you don't actually know


00:08:45.120 --> 00:08:47.269
it's there. You've got to find other


00:08:47.279 --> 00:08:49.110
you've got to find other ways of


00:08:49.120 --> 00:08:50.550
detecting it because there's got not


00:08:50.560 --> 00:08:51.509
going to be any change in the


00:08:51.519 --> 00:08:53.590
gravitational wave signal over, you


00:08:53.600 --> 00:08:56.389
know, a human experimental lifetime. If


00:08:56.399 --> 00:08:59.190
you've got a frequency whose time


00:08:59.200 --> 00:09:00.870
interval is measured in billions of


00:09:00.880 --> 00:09:02.070
years, forget it.


00:09:02.080 --> 00:09:04.150
>> Yeah, that's a tough one.


00:09:04.160 --> 00:09:06.310
>> Forget it.


00:09:06.320 --> 00:09:08.470
>> Thanks, Boa. That's a great question and


00:09:08.480 --> 00:09:10.230
thanks for sending it in. Uh, we've got


00:09:10.240 --> 00:09:11.829
a question from one of our regulars,


00:09:11.839 --> 00:09:15.110
Renie, uh, who is from sunny West Hills,


00:09:15.120 --> 00:09:17.350
California. Uh, this is a what if


00:09:17.360 --> 00:09:18.949
question. And theoretically, if the sun


00:09:18.959 --> 00:09:21.030
were never to die, let's assume it's


00:09:21.040 --> 00:09:23.829
just never going to die, would the Earth


00:09:23.839 --> 00:09:26.710
eventually erode, decay,


00:09:26.720 --> 00:09:28.550
and die on its own?


00:09:28.560 --> 00:09:31.430
>> Um, yeah. Um, it's


00:09:31.440 --> 00:09:33.430
>> Well, my answer is no, because we'll


00:09:33.440 --> 00:09:35.829
destroy it first. It it could be very


00:09:35.839 --> 00:09:37.910
different. I mean what so if what Ren is


00:09:37.920 --> 00:09:40.389
saying is that yes the sun we know it's


00:09:40.399 --> 00:09:41.829
going to evolve over the next few


00:09:41.839 --> 00:09:43.990
billion years uh and it will change and


00:09:44.000 --> 00:09:45.910
that will eventually result in the earth


00:09:45.920 --> 00:09:47.590
being swamped by the outer atmosphere of


00:09:47.600 --> 00:09:49.829
the sun which might not be very nice for


00:09:49.839 --> 00:09:53.670
anybody left on earth. Uh but uh if that


00:09:53.680 --> 00:09:56.790
didn't happen, if the sun just um you


00:09:56.800 --> 00:09:58.870
know went on its merry way being a


00:09:58.880 --> 00:10:01.269
normal star,


00:10:01.279 --> 00:10:02.790
the there will be a few things that will


00:10:02.800 --> 00:10:05.269
happen over that time scale which


00:10:05.279 --> 00:10:06.949
wouldn't which wouldn't which we know


00:10:06.959 --> 00:10:09.350
won't happen because the sun's going the


00:10:09.360 --> 00:10:11.269
sun turning into a red giant's going to


00:10:11.279 --> 00:10:16.470
overtake it. One of them is uh the um


00:10:16.480 --> 00:10:19.110
tidal breaking of the earth's rotation


00:10:19.120 --> 00:10:21.670
so that it always uh faces the moon. So


00:10:21.680 --> 00:10:27.030
the earth's day will change from uh 24


00:10:27.040 --> 00:10:28.870
hours to something like if I remember


00:10:28.880 --> 00:10:31.269
rightly it's 42 days that it's it's


00:10:31.279 --> 00:10:33.110
about that length of time.


00:10:33.120 --> 00:10:35.829
>> Uh and that's it turning once and the


00:10:35.839 --> 00:10:39.190
moon will go around the sky around the


00:10:39.200 --> 00:10:41.030
earth in the same time. So the earth and


00:10:41.040 --> 00:10:43.030
the moon will constantly face one


00:10:43.040 --> 00:10:45.350
another with a a month and a day which


00:10:45.360 --> 00:10:46.870
are both equivalent to I think it's


00:10:46.880 --> 00:10:49.990
about 42 43 days something like that. Uh


00:10:50.000 --> 00:10:51.990
so that's that's going to change things


00:10:52.000 --> 00:10:54.949
quite a bit. Um so that would you know


00:10:54.959 --> 00:10:57.350
certainly alter the the um atmospheric


00:10:57.360 --> 00:10:59.590
dynamics of the earth if one side's


00:10:59.600 --> 00:11:01.829
getting warmed up for 40 of 20 days


00:11:01.839 --> 00:11:04.470
rather than just one day uh of day and


00:11:04.480 --> 00:11:08.230
night. So a lot of things change um and


00:11:08.240 --> 00:11:11.430
yeah the constant bombardment by the


00:11:11.440 --> 00:11:14.630
magnetic particles from the sun uh I


00:11:14.640 --> 00:11:16.069
don't know to what extent the earth's


00:11:16.079 --> 00:11:17.670
magnetic field might erode but there


00:11:17.680 --> 00:11:21.350
will certainly be be changes may even be


00:11:21.360 --> 00:11:24.710
>> what about go ahead go on sorry


00:11:24.720 --> 00:11:26.710
>> no I was just going to say if humans


00:11:26.720 --> 00:11:29.670
were still around in that period uh


00:11:29.680 --> 00:11:32.949
would we well okay no let me rephrase


00:11:32.959 --> 00:11:35.910
would we adapt as these things changed


00:11:35.920 --> 00:11:37.910
and reached that point, would we be able


00:11:37.920 --> 00:11:39.990
to adapt as a species and other life on


00:11:40.000 --> 00:11:42.470
Earth adapt to live in that kind of


00:11:42.480 --> 00:11:43.110
environment?


00:11:43.120 --> 00:11:45.030
>> Well, it certainly is these changes are


00:11:45.040 --> 00:11:47.590
ones that take place very slowly indeed.


00:11:47.600 --> 00:11:50.949
Uh and and over kind of longer periods


00:11:50.959 --> 00:11:53.590
than the characteristic evolution time


00:11:53.600 --> 00:11:55.990
to get from, you know, one mutation to


00:11:56.000 --> 00:11:57.509
another, whatever that might be for


00:11:57.519 --> 00:12:01.350
humans. Um, so yeah, they're they're


00:12:01.360 --> 00:12:04.310
slow and uh I'm sure humans could adapt


00:12:04.320 --> 00:12:06.790
to them. Uh, we're a pretty adaptive


00:12:06.800 --> 00:12:08.550
species. We might also by then be


00:12:08.560 --> 00:12:10.949
capable of building the mega structures


00:12:10.959 --> 00:12:12.710
that might protect us from some of the


00:12:12.720 --> 00:12:16.310
sun's funny things going on. Uh, it's


00:12:16.320 --> 00:12:18.550
hard to know really, isn't it? But but I


00:12:18.560 --> 00:12:19.829
I think generally speaking, I mean,


00:12:19.839 --> 00:12:21.750
Reny's question is a good one. Um, what


00:12:21.760 --> 00:12:24.230
happens if uh if nothing happens to the


00:12:24.240 --> 00:12:26.629
sun? Uh, does the earth just sort of


00:12:26.639 --> 00:12:29.509
survive? It probably survives. It will


00:12:29.519 --> 00:12:31.750
be changed. We might find we're all


00:12:31.760 --> 00:12:33.590
living in plastic domes or something by


00:12:33.600 --> 00:12:36.389
then rather than, you know, because the


00:12:36.399 --> 00:12:38.389
atmosphere has been so messed about


00:12:38.399 --> 00:12:41.190
with. But yes. Yes. I think I think I


00:12:41.200 --> 00:12:43.350
I'm I'm an optimist that humankind would


00:12:43.360 --> 00:12:44.790
survive.


00:12:44.800 --> 00:12:48.550
>> Yeah. Um now it's interesting because um


00:12:48.560 --> 00:12:50.069
I mean we we know what's going to


00:12:50.079 --> 00:12:51.430
happen. We kind of know when it's going


00:12:51.440 --> 00:12:54.150
to happen, but I if it didn't, it would


00:12:54.160 --> 00:12:56.710
create a whole array of new challenges


00:12:56.720 --> 00:12:59.269
for humanity because we would have to


00:12:59.279 --> 00:13:03.269
learn to live in a very


00:13:03.279 --> 00:13:05.110
somewhat hostile environment, I imagine,


00:13:05.120 --> 00:13:07.509
because um the the planet would not be


00:13:07.519 --> 00:13:09.829
the same. And I can't imagine what it


00:13:09.839 --> 00:13:12.470
would be like to have a 42 long


00:13:12.480 --> 00:13:14.949
>> 42 day long day.


00:13:14.959 --> 00:13:15.670
>> Um


00:13:15.680 --> 00:13:17.350
>> well, you know, birthdays would be few


00:13:17.360 --> 00:13:19.030
and far between, wouldn't they? uh they


00:13:19.040 --> 00:13:20.629
would, but you you know we're gonna


00:13:20.639 --> 00:13:22.069
we're going to know what that's like


00:13:22.079 --> 00:13:24.230
very soon because the the day on the


00:13:24.240 --> 00:13:27.750
moon is 20, you know, uh 29 days


00:13:27.760 --> 00:13:29.190
effectively from one


00:13:29.200 --> 00:13:31.670
>> full moon to another. So yeah, so we've


00:13:31.680 --> 00:13:33.910
we've we've already got something like


00:13:33.920 --> 00:13:36.150
that uh in store for people to


00:13:36.160 --> 00:13:37.829
experience. It'll be very interesting to


00:13:37.839 --> 00:13:40.629
see what even the Arteimus astronauts on


00:13:40.639 --> 00:13:43.430
the moon make of all that.


00:13:43.440 --> 00:13:45.509
>> Yeah. Yeah. Very interesting, Renie.


00:13:45.519 --> 00:13:46.710
That's a great question. Thanks for


00:13:46.720 --> 00:13:49.750
sending it in. Much appreciated. And


00:13:49.760 --> 00:13:53.590
next up, we've uh got Daniel. Uh this is


00:13:53.600 --> 00:13:55.110
um


00:13:55.120 --> 00:13:59.269
a sort of dark energy question. Sort of.


00:13:59.279 --> 00:14:01.350
Hey guys, Daniel from Adelaide here.


00:14:01.360 --> 00:14:02.629
There seems to be more and more


00:14:02.639 --> 00:14:04.310
discoveries lately in the very early


00:14:04.320 --> 00:14:05.750
universe that shouldn't be possible


00:14:05.760 --> 00:14:07.829
because not enough time has passed like


00:14:07.839 --> 00:14:10.069
size of galaxies or black holes. I've


00:14:10.079 --> 00:14:11.829
got a far out theory I'd love to share.


00:14:11.839 --> 00:14:14.310
What if time and dark energy were


00:14:14.320 --> 00:14:16.150
actually the same thing? So we know for


00:14:16.160 --> 00:14:17.750
about the second half of the universe


00:14:17.760 --> 00:14:19.590
that dark energy has been accelerating


00:14:19.600 --> 00:14:21.829
its expansion. Could this therefore mean


00:14:21.839 --> 00:14:23.430
that there was less dark energy in the


00:14:23.440 --> 00:14:25.590
first half? And if that's the case, what


00:14:25.600 --> 00:14:27.030
if time actually went slower in the


00:14:27.040 --> 00:14:29.110
early universe? So from our perspective,


00:14:29.120 --> 00:14:31.430
what took a really short amount of time


00:14:31.440 --> 00:14:33.269
actually happened in normal time with


00:14:33.279 --> 00:14:35.269
normal being in quotes. I'd previously


00:14:35.279 --> 00:14:36.870
asked a question on the show whether


00:14:36.880 --> 00:14:39.110
dark energy is related to black holes. I


00:14:39.120 --> 00:14:40.389
think there was a paper around the time


00:14:40.399 --> 00:14:42.389
that that kind of suggested that it was


00:14:42.399 --> 00:14:44.310
and we know that black holes do distort


00:14:44.320 --> 00:14:46.710
time. So, if time is part of the fabric


00:14:46.720 --> 00:14:48.629
of space,


00:14:48.639 --> 00:14:50.870
maybe dark energy is too, but it's


00:14:50.880 --> 00:14:52.389
actually one of the same thing. I'm


00:14:52.399 --> 00:14:55.189
expecting a very quick simple no, but I


00:14:55.199 --> 00:14:57.670
wanted to ask anyway.


00:14:57.680 --> 00:15:00.550
>> All right. Thanks, Daniel. Uh, yeah. Is


00:15:00.560 --> 00:15:03.030
um time and dark energy, are they the


00:15:03.040 --> 00:15:04.629
same thing?


00:15:04.639 --> 00:15:06.470
>> You never get a quick and simple no from


00:15:06.480 --> 00:15:09.750
me, Daniel. It's always a long drawn out


00:15:09.760 --> 00:15:11.990
complex no.


00:15:12.000 --> 00:15:15.110
not always but I think in this case yeah


00:15:15.120 --> 00:15:17.110
your your thinking is interesting uh


00:15:17.120 --> 00:15:19.030
we've we've talked recently as well


00:15:19.040 --> 00:15:24.389
about the um the fact that um


00:15:24.399 --> 00:15:26.389
this new controversial theory from Joe


00:15:26.399 --> 00:15:29.750
Silk at all uh over in Baltimore


00:15:29.760 --> 00:15:31.750
suggesting that perhaps black holes


00:15:31.760 --> 00:15:33.350
super massive black holes came first


00:15:33.360 --> 00:15:35.030
they were formed in the early universe


00:15:35.040 --> 00:15:37.430
and that goes a long way to explaining


00:15:37.440 --> 00:15:39.110
uh the conundrum that you mentioned at


00:15:39.120 --> 00:15:40.550
the start of your question there that a


00:15:40.560 --> 00:15:42.790
lot seems to have happened in the first


00:15:42.800 --> 00:15:46.150
uh in the first uh few millions or


00:15:46.160 --> 00:15:48.310
hundreds of millions of years of the


00:15:48.320 --> 00:15:52.230
universe's existence. Um so we we kind


00:15:52.240 --> 00:15:55.430
of understand the grav the gravitational


00:15:55.440 --> 00:15:58.470
time dilation uh effects pretty well and


00:15:58.480 --> 00:16:01.749
they're actually quite small uh from our


00:16:01.759 --> 00:16:05.670
vantage point here 38 13.8 billion years


00:16:05.680 --> 00:16:09.350
later. Um, and we and but you're right


00:16:09.360 --> 00:16:12.790
to make the point that uh dark energy uh


00:16:12.800 --> 00:16:15.749
only seems to have appeared over the


00:16:15.759 --> 00:16:17.350
second half of the age of the universe,


00:16:17.360 --> 00:16:21.829
but that's more likely to be uh it's


00:16:21.839 --> 00:16:24.069
because it its measurable effect has


00:16:24.079 --> 00:16:26.550
only become apparent. We think that


00:16:26.560 --> 00:16:28.949
during the first half of the universe's


00:16:28.959 --> 00:16:32.949
age, um there was the galaxies within


00:16:32.959 --> 00:16:34.550
the universe were close enough to each


00:16:34.560 --> 00:16:36.710
other that gravitational attraction


00:16:36.720 --> 00:16:39.829
would have basically kept the expansion


00:16:39.839 --> 00:16:41.590
due to dark energy in check, the


00:16:41.600 --> 00:16:44.069
accelerated expansion uh due to dark


00:16:44.079 --> 00:16:47.030
energy. Uh and so it's only when you get


00:16:47.040 --> 00:16:49.430
past a kind of tipping point where


00:16:49.440 --> 00:16:52.150
suddenly the the mass of galaxies in the


00:16:52.160 --> 00:16:54.629
universe is not enough not strong enough


00:16:54.639 --> 00:16:57.350
gravitationally to break the


00:16:57.360 --> 00:16:59.509
acceleration of the expansion. By that I


00:16:59.519 --> 00:17:03.670
mean B R A K rather than B R E A K. Uh


00:17:03.680 --> 00:17:05.909
it's not enough to slow it down. And so


00:17:05.919 --> 00:17:09.110
the acceleration takes over. Uh and


00:17:09.120 --> 00:17:11.909
that's why it's a tricky thing just to


00:17:11.919 --> 00:17:14.390
try and tease out and we've talked about


00:17:14.400 --> 00:17:17.669
this recently as well whether the dark


00:17:17.679 --> 00:17:19.350
energy is a constant whether it's


00:17:19.360 --> 00:17:22.789
something that's uh a factor that hasn't


00:17:22.799 --> 00:17:25.909
changed in terms of its uh its release


00:17:25.919 --> 00:17:29.430
as space as space expands. Um it's


00:17:29.440 --> 00:17:31.669
because there is this added impact of


00:17:31.679 --> 00:17:34.390
the gravitational pull of the galaxies


00:17:34.400 --> 00:17:37.190
uh stopping us from basically seeing the


00:17:37.200 --> 00:17:39.510
effect of dark energy the accelerated


00:17:39.520 --> 00:17:41.190
expansion of the universe back in the


00:17:41.200 --> 00:17:42.950
early universe. So I think all those


00:17:42.960 --> 00:17:45.430
things are are well and truly understood


00:17:45.440 --> 00:17:48.230
and kept fairly separate by the by the


00:17:48.240 --> 00:17:49.990
scientists looking at them. And by that


00:17:50.000 --> 00:17:52.230
I mean time and and dark energy. So


00:17:52.240 --> 00:17:55.350
that's a long complicated no.


00:17:55.360 --> 00:17:58.710
>> Yeah. Yeah. Um, okay. Daniel Winfred


00:17:58.720 --> 00:18:00.470
says, "I think these things have been


00:18:00.480 --> 00:18:02.230
long understood." That's that's his way


00:18:02.240 --> 00:18:05.909
of saying you're way off way way off the


00:18:05.919 --> 00:18:10.310
mark.


00:18:10.320 --> 00:18:12.390
>> But it's worth asking because otherwise,


00:18:12.400 --> 00:18:13.990
you know, obviously this is something


00:18:14.000 --> 00:18:15.669
people are thinking about. So, it's


00:18:15.679 --> 00:18:18.789
worth asking these um these


00:18:18.799 --> 00:18:21.750
>> different questions to um just, you


00:18:21.760 --> 00:18:24.630
know, see see if it's a possibility.


00:18:24.640 --> 00:18:26.390
>> Thanks, Daniel. Appreciate that.


00:18:26.400 --> 00:18:27.190
>> Great question.


00:18:27.200 --> 00:18:29.110
>> Uh, if you've got questions for us,


00:18:29.120 --> 00:18:30.710
please send them in because we could


00:18:30.720 --> 00:18:33.110
always use them. Uh, just, uh, go to our


00:18:33.120 --> 00:18:35.270
website, spacenutspodcast.com,


00:18:35.280 --> 00:18:36.789
spacenuts.io,


00:18:36.799 --> 00:18:38.710
and click on the various links. The AMA


00:18:38.720 --> 00:18:42.230
link will give you, uh, access to, uh,


00:18:42.240 --> 00:18:45.510
text and voice uh, audio. Or you can


00:18:45.520 --> 00:18:47.270
click on the little, it's not purple,


00:18:47.280 --> 00:18:48.630
it's green. When did they change the


00:18:48.640 --> 00:18:51.350
color of that? Uh, send us your Oh, no.


00:18:51.360 --> 00:18:52.870
It's It's purple when you hover on it.


00:18:52.880 --> 00:18:55.669
There you go. Uh send us your questions


00:18:55.679 --> 00:18:56.950
uh on the right hand side of our


00:18:56.960 --> 00:18:59.029
homepage and uh don't forget to tell us


00:18:59.039 --> 00:19:01.110
who you are and where you're from. Fred,


00:19:01.120 --> 00:19:02.789
we're done again. Thank you so much.


00:19:02.799 --> 00:19:05.029
>> Uh always a pleasure, Andrew. And I hope


00:19:05.039 --> 00:19:07.669
we'll stick it again very very soon.


00:19:07.679 --> 00:19:10.150
It's a distinct possibility. Could be


00:19:10.160 --> 00:19:13.110
with could be within 13.8 billion years


00:19:13.120 --> 00:19:14.070
in fact.


00:19:14.080 --> 00:19:16.789
>> Yes. Thanks uh Fred. See you soon. Fred


00:19:16.799 --> 00:19:19.029
Watson, astronomer at large. And uh


00:19:19.039 --> 00:19:20.710
thanks to Hugh in the studio for making


00:19:20.720 --> 00:19:22.150
our lives so much more difficult with


00:19:22.160 --> 00:19:25.270
these split episodes. But no, it's okay.


00:19:25.280 --> 00:19:27.110
Uh and from me, Andrew Dunley, thank you


00:19:27.120 --> 00:19:28.630
so much for joining us. Uh looking


00:19:28.640 --> 00:19:29.909
forward to your company on the next


00:19:29.919 --> 00:19:33.190
episode of Space Nuts. See you then.


00:19:33.200 --> 00:19:34.150
>> Space Nuts.


00:19:34.160 --> 00:19:36.310
>> You'll be listening to the Space Nuts


00:19:36.320 --> 00:19:38.549
podcast


00:19:38.559 --> 00:19:41.510
>> available at Apple Podcasts, Spotify,


00:19:41.520 --> 00:19:44.150
iHeart Radio, or your favorite podcast


00:19:44.160 --> 00:19:46.549
player. You can also stream on demand at


00:19:46.559 --> 00:19:49.430
byes.com. This has been another quality


00:19:49.440 --> 00:19:54.039
podcast production from sites.com.