Europa’s Ocean Secrets, Gravitational Waves & Black Hole Mysteries | Space Nuts: Astronomy...
This episode of Space Nuts is brought to you with the support of Antigravity A1 . Experience the future of flight with the world’s first all-in-one 8K 360 drone . With intuitive controls and immersive goggles, the Antigravity A1 redefines what it means to fly. Check it out at AntigravityA1. (https://www.antigravity.tech/drone/antigravity-a1/buy?utm_term=spacenuts)
Archived Insights: Europa Clipper, Gravitational Waves, and Black Hole Mysteries
In this special episode of Space Nuts , hosts Andrew Dunkley and Professor Fred Watson take a fascinating journey through some of the most compelling questions and discoveries in astronomy. As they explore the Europa Clipper mission, the nature of gravitational waves, and the enigmatic world of black holes, listeners are treated to a rich tapestry of cosmic knowledge. This episode originally aired in 2019.
Episode Highlights:
- Europa Clipper Mission: Andrew and Fred discuss NASA's exciting approval for the Europa Clipper mission, aimed at exploring Jupiter's icy moon Europa. They delve into the spacecraft's objectives, including investigating the moon's potential subsurface ocean and the challenges posed by Jupiter's intense radiation.
- Gravitational Waves Explained: The hosts explore the recent detection of gravitational waves, speculating on their origins, including a possible black hole-neutron star merger. They discuss the significance of these findings and the ongoing efforts of astronomers to understand the universe's most violent events.
- Black Hole Chris: Listener questions about the nature of black holes spark a lively discussion on topics such as infinite density, event horizons, and the complexities of capturing images of these cosmic phenomena. Andrew and Fred clarify misconceptions and provide insightful explanations.
- Space Travel and Relativity: The episode wraps up with an intriguing listener question about the effects of traveling near the speed of light. Andrew and Fred clarify how relativistic mass works and dispel myths surrounding the transformation of spaceships into black holes.
For more Space Nuts, including our continuously updating newsfeed and to listen to all our episodes, visit our website. (https://www.spacenutspodcast.com/) Follow us on social media at SpaceNutsPod on Facebook, X, YouTube Music Music, Tumblr, Instagram, and TikTok. We love engaging with our community, so be sure to drop us a message or comment on your favorite platform.
If you’d like to help support Space Nuts and join our growing family of insiders for commercial-free episodes and more, visit spacenutspodcast.com/about (https://www.spacenutspodcast.com/about) .
Stay curious, keep looking up, and join us next time for more stellar insights and cosmic wonders. Until then, clear skies and happy stargazing.
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/space-nuts-astronomy-insights-cosmic-discoveries--2631155/support (https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/space-nuts-astronomy-insights-cosmic-discoveries--2631155/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss) .
Episode link: https://play.headliner.app/episode/30915703?utm_source=youtube
Kind: captions
Language: en
00:00:00.719 --> 00:00:02.790
Hi, Andrew Dunley here. Fred and I are
00:00:02.800 --> 00:00:04.390
taking a little bit of a break over the
00:00:04.400 --> 00:00:06.230
Christmas New Year period just to catch
00:00:06.240 --> 00:00:09.030
our breath. We'll be back uh sometime
00:00:09.040 --> 00:00:11.430
around mid January. In the meantime,
00:00:11.440 --> 00:00:13.350
we've been digging through the archives
00:00:13.360 --> 00:00:16.470
at some of the most perplexing and
00:00:16.480 --> 00:00:18.630
popular episodes that we've done in
00:00:18.640 --> 00:00:22.150
recent times. So, sit back and enjoy.
00:00:22.160 --> 00:00:27.029
>> 15 seconds. Guidance is internal. 10 9
00:00:27.039 --> 00:00:29.669
ignition sequence start. Space Nuts.
00:00:29.679 --> 00:00:32.229
>> 5 4 3 2
00:00:32.239 --> 00:00:34.549
>> 1 2 3 4 5 2 1
00:00:34.559 --> 00:00:35.750
>> Space Nuts.
00:00:35.760 --> 00:00:38.310
>> Astronauts report. It feels good.
00:00:38.320 --> 00:00:40.069
>> Hi there and thanks for joining us on
00:00:40.079 --> 00:00:42.549
the Space Nuts podcast. My name is
00:00:42.559 --> 00:00:44.790
Andrew Dunley, your host. And joining
00:00:44.800 --> 00:00:47.670
me, as always, Professor Fred Watson,
00:00:47.680 --> 00:00:49.830
astronomer at large from the department
00:00:49.840 --> 00:00:52.229
of da da da da da. It's a pretty long
00:00:52.239 --> 00:00:54.150
title. That's what we'll call it from
00:00:54.160 --> 00:00:56.150
now on. Good day, Fred. You could call
00:00:56.160 --> 00:00:58.869
me the AAL because AAL.
00:00:58.879 --> 00:01:00.709
>> Yeah. When I was when I was astronomer
00:01:00.719 --> 00:01:03.189
in charge, I was AIC.
00:01:03.199 --> 00:01:05.670
The only trouble is AAL actually has
00:01:05.680 --> 00:01:07.670
another significant meaning in
00:01:07.680 --> 00:01:09.510
Australian astronomy because it doesn't
00:01:09.520 --> 00:01:11.109
only stand for astronomer at large. It
00:01:11.119 --> 00:01:13.590
also stands for Astronomy Australia
00:01:13.600 --> 00:01:16.230
Limited. So, uh, just throw that idea
00:01:16.240 --> 00:01:17.749
out. That's a rubbish idea. It'll just
00:01:17.759 --> 00:01:18.789
be a Yeah,
00:01:18.799 --> 00:01:21.990
>> I was once given the title URS.
00:01:22.000 --> 00:01:25.830
But anyway, um,
00:01:25.840 --> 00:01:27.670
some people will understand that.
00:01:27.680 --> 00:01:29.030
>> Yeah. You've got lovely friends, haven't
00:01:29.040 --> 00:01:29.270
you?
00:01:29.280 --> 00:01:31.030
>> I've got a lot of good friends. Yes.
00:01:31.040 --> 00:01:31.830
>> Yeah. Yeah.
00:01:31.840 --> 00:01:33.749
>> Now, today we're going to talk about
00:01:33.759 --> 00:01:35.910
some very exciting things. It looks like
00:01:35.920 --> 00:01:37.910
black holes are still in people's minds.
00:01:37.920 --> 00:01:40.550
So, we're going to be talking about um a
00:01:40.560 --> 00:01:41.749
couple of questions that have come in
00:01:41.759 --> 00:01:44.950
from people about infinite density. Uh,
00:01:44.960 --> 00:01:46.630
density. I keep getting it mixed up with
00:01:46.640 --> 00:01:48.950
destiny. I don't know why. might have
00:01:48.960 --> 00:01:50.469
been a Back to the Future movie that
00:01:50.479 --> 00:01:52.710
confused me on that front. Uh, and
00:01:52.720 --> 00:01:55.030
issues photographing a black hole. Why
00:01:55.040 --> 00:01:57.350
were they issues at all? And another
00:01:57.360 --> 00:02:00.069
question about space travel and near
00:02:00.079 --> 00:02:03.030
light speed travel. Uh, we're also going
00:02:03.040 --> 00:02:07.030
to look at um the cause of a
00:02:07.040 --> 00:02:08.949
gravitational wave that was detected
00:02:08.959 --> 00:02:10.469
recently. This is exciting because they
00:02:10.479 --> 00:02:12.550
think they've pinpointed an actual
00:02:12.560 --> 00:02:14.070
cause.
00:02:14.080 --> 00:02:15.589
And we're going to start off today,
00:02:15.599 --> 00:02:17.589
Fred, by talking about this rather
00:02:17.599 --> 00:02:19.589
exciting mission that's one step closer
00:02:19.599 --> 00:02:22.630
to happening. A mission to Jupiter's ice
00:02:22.640 --> 00:02:25.350
moon Europa. And that's what we'll start
00:02:25.360 --> 00:02:27.270
with this uh well this afternoon, this
00:02:27.280 --> 00:02:28.869
morning, tonight, this evening,
00:02:28.879 --> 00:02:30.550
yesterday,
00:02:30.560 --> 00:02:31.350
whenever
00:02:31.360 --> 00:02:34.150
>> whenever it is. Yeah, it's Yeah. So
00:02:34.160 --> 00:02:36.790
look, a terrific story, very good news
00:02:36.800 --> 00:02:39.990
from uh NASA that they um the powers
00:02:40.000 --> 00:02:42.630
that be within NASA have uh given the
00:02:42.640 --> 00:02:46.229
go-ahad um for a mission called Europa
00:02:46.239 --> 00:02:48.790
Clipper, which is is one of the uh
00:02:48.800 --> 00:02:52.229
missions that's been uh postulated or or
00:02:52.239 --> 00:02:55.030
sorry proposed is a better word for um
00:02:55.040 --> 00:02:56.550
exploring the moons of the outer
00:02:56.560 --> 00:02:58.070
planets. There are a number that are
00:02:58.080 --> 00:02:59.990
kind of on the on the table at the
00:03:00.000 --> 00:03:01.750
moment. Some further advanced than
00:03:01.760 --> 00:03:04.550
others, but Europa Clipper is pretty
00:03:04.560 --> 00:03:07.430
well advanced and as you can tell it's
00:03:07.440 --> 00:03:09.350
target, its main target is Jupiter's
00:03:09.360 --> 00:03:12.309
moon Europa, which is one of these um
00:03:12.319 --> 00:03:16.390
ocean moons, uh ice ocean moons. Uh we
00:03:16.400 --> 00:03:18.869
believe it has a covering of ice, and we
00:03:18.879 --> 00:03:20.070
don't know whether it's thin ice or
00:03:20.080 --> 00:03:21.750
thick ice. So that will be one of the
00:03:21.760 --> 00:03:23.670
things that Europa Clipper would find
00:03:23.680 --> 00:03:26.949
out. um and an ocean underneath it and
00:03:26.959 --> 00:03:30.550
and a rocky core. Uh so Europa Clipper I
00:03:30.560 --> 00:03:33.110
think they are talking about having it
00:03:33.120 --> 00:03:37.750
ready for launch in 2023 which is um you
00:03:37.760 --> 00:03:40.470
know fantastic if if they can do that.
00:03:40.480 --> 00:03:43.110
That's right. Uh but apparently that's
00:03:43.120 --> 00:03:46.229
um that's the the the the baseline
00:03:46.239 --> 00:03:48.550
commitment as it's called supports a
00:03:48.560 --> 00:03:51.750
launch readiness date by 2025. Um, it's
00:03:51.760 --> 00:03:53.509
all being done at the Jet Propulsion
00:03:53.519 --> 00:03:56.070
Laboratory in Pasadena. That's where the
00:03:56.080 --> 00:03:58.390
spacecraft will be built. So, they've
00:03:58.400 --> 00:04:02.309
got the go-ahad. It's um it's got a you
00:04:02.319 --> 00:04:06.390
know, the next step in uh in approval
00:04:06.400 --> 00:04:09.110
from NASA, which I think is a pretty
00:04:09.120 --> 00:04:12.390
solid one. So, I think we you and I in
00:04:12.400 --> 00:04:13.990
2025
00:04:14.000 --> 00:04:16.069
will be talking a lot about Europa
00:04:16.079 --> 00:04:18.949
Clipper maybe. Yeah. and it and what
00:04:18.959 --> 00:04:20.949
will be the basis of the of the mission?
00:04:20.959 --> 00:04:22.710
Are they just going there to have a look
00:04:22.720 --> 00:04:23.670
because
00:04:23.680 --> 00:04:25.909
>> it is a bit like that but it's a very
00:04:25.919 --> 00:04:27.990
good look. Um so it's not going to land
00:04:28.000 --> 00:04:30.629
on Europa. It is a proposal to go into
00:04:30.639 --> 00:04:32.550
orbit around Europe actually to go into
00:04:32.560 --> 00:04:35.430
orbit around Jupiter. Uh and of course
00:04:35.440 --> 00:04:37.270
orbiting Jupiter is always hazardous
00:04:37.280 --> 00:04:40.310
because of the the intense um you know
00:04:40.320 --> 00:04:42.950
the intense uh radiation belts that
00:04:42.960 --> 00:04:45.110
Jupiter has. It's got a magnetic field
00:04:45.120 --> 00:04:47.110
thousands of times bigger than the
00:04:47.120 --> 00:04:48.550
earth's and has these high energy
00:04:48.560 --> 00:04:51.110
radiation belts around it that threaten
00:04:51.120 --> 00:04:54.710
to melt the inards of spacecraft. Uh so
00:04:54.720 --> 00:04:56.710
like uh the Juno mission which is
00:04:56.720 --> 00:04:59.350
currently in orbit around Jupiter, this
00:04:59.360 --> 00:05:02.870
uh Europa Clipper will go into a very uh
00:05:02.880 --> 00:05:08.469
elongated orbit um which will give it 45
00:05:08.479 --> 00:05:12.390
flybys of Europa. Uh, and the altitudes
00:05:12.400 --> 00:05:15.510
will vary from 2,700 kilometers to 25
00:05:15.520 --> 00:05:17.189
kilometers. So, it will really be
00:05:17.199 --> 00:05:18.550
skimming over the surface.
00:05:18.560 --> 00:05:19.189
>> Oh, will.
00:05:19.199 --> 00:05:21.430
>> And it's got this huge science package
00:05:21.440 --> 00:05:23.670
with all the kind of, you know, the
00:05:23.680 --> 00:05:25.830
goubbins that you would expect to find
00:05:25.840 --> 00:05:28.629
on board something like that, including
00:05:28.639 --> 00:05:30.870
a mass spectrometer,
00:05:30.880 --> 00:05:34.070
uh, which basically measures, you know,
00:05:34.080 --> 00:05:36.150
the the weights of atoms, as you might
00:05:36.160 --> 00:05:39.430
guess. Uh it um that is interesting
00:05:39.440 --> 00:05:42.310
because Europa like Saturn's moon
00:05:42.320 --> 00:05:44.390
Enceladus is thought to have although it
00:05:44.400 --> 00:05:45.830
hasn't really been properly confirmed
00:05:45.840 --> 00:05:49.510
but thought to have uh ice uh fountains
00:05:49.520 --> 00:05:52.310
coming out of it. Um which are water
00:05:52.320 --> 00:05:54.629
that's squirting up through its uh
00:05:54.639 --> 00:05:56.870
through its icy shell and instantly
00:05:56.880 --> 00:05:59.029
freezing. It's not frozen. But if you
00:05:59.039 --> 00:06:01.029
fly through it as Cassini did with
00:06:01.039 --> 00:06:03.749
Enceladus, then you can sample what the
00:06:03.759 --> 00:06:06.150
atomic makeup is. And so the mass
00:06:06.160 --> 00:06:09.350
spectrometer will help with that. Uh and
00:06:09.360 --> 00:06:12.790
also um it's got this ground penetrating
00:06:12.800 --> 00:06:16.309
radar and that's going to be crucial in
00:06:16.319 --> 00:06:19.830
characterizing Europa's crust um and
00:06:19.840 --> 00:06:22.309
revealing how much of you know the
00:06:22.319 --> 00:06:25.430
potential water within is oceanic as as
00:06:25.440 --> 00:06:27.749
is expected or whether it is just
00:06:27.759 --> 00:06:29.749
pockets of water as we find in
00:06:29.759 --> 00:06:31.670
Antarctica and indeed around the south
00:06:31.680 --> 00:06:33.590
pole of Mars. Will they be able to tell
00:06:33.600 --> 00:06:36.070
what kind of water it is?
00:06:36.080 --> 00:06:40.870
>> Um uh to to some extent they will. Um it
00:06:40.880 --> 00:06:44.550
it may require a bit of um you know
00:06:44.560 --> 00:06:46.629
inference from other measurements. But
00:06:46.639 --> 00:06:49.909
if you've got samples of ice crystals,
00:06:49.919 --> 00:06:52.870
uh then you can do exactly that. you can
00:06:52.880 --> 00:06:56.469
you know you can uh basically tell tell
00:06:56.479 --> 00:06:59.350
whether it's saline water or fresh water
00:06:59.360 --> 00:07:01.189
because you can see the you can measure
00:07:01.199 --> 00:07:04.550
the salt content of it. So like um
00:07:04.560 --> 00:07:07.510
Saturn's moon and Celadus uh which is
00:07:07.520 --> 00:07:09.510
actually quite rich in minerals and and
00:07:09.520 --> 00:07:11.430
it's the silicut in that that tells you
00:07:11.440 --> 00:07:13.589
that this water was once in contact with
00:07:13.599 --> 00:07:17.110
with rock. Uh, I think the Europa
00:07:17.120 --> 00:07:18.950
Clipper will be able to sample exactly
00:07:18.960 --> 00:07:21.189
those things too, assuming these plumes
00:07:21.199 --> 00:07:23.430
are real because they're then they're
00:07:23.440 --> 00:07:25.029
not well observed. There are there is
00:07:25.039 --> 00:07:27.029
evidence. I've seen images that that
00:07:27.039 --> 00:07:29.189
seem to show these plumes coming from
00:07:29.199 --> 00:07:31.909
Europa. Uh, assuming they're real, when
00:07:31.919 --> 00:07:33.909
they fly through, um, hopefully we will
00:07:33.919 --> 00:07:35.430
be able to tell what kind of water it is
00:07:35.440 --> 00:07:36.070
exactly.
00:07:36.080 --> 00:07:38.710
>> And will they be able to tell how much
00:07:38.720 --> 00:07:40.950
water there is underneath the surface?
00:07:40.960 --> 00:07:43.749
Yes, they will because that will very
00:07:43.759 --> 00:07:46.309
much be revealed by the um the ground
00:07:46.319 --> 00:07:49.029
penetrating radar in exactly the way
00:07:49.039 --> 00:07:51.670
that um one of the spacecraft in orbit
00:07:51.680 --> 00:07:53.350
around Mars. I think it was the I think
00:07:53.360 --> 00:07:54.629
it was might even have been Mars
00:07:54.639 --> 00:07:56.550
Reconnaissance Orbiter, I'm not sure,
00:07:56.560 --> 00:07:59.670
detected this lake of liquid water
00:07:59.680 --> 00:08:01.589
underneath the ice cap of the southern
00:08:01.599 --> 00:08:03.909
ice cap of Mars about a year ago. You
00:08:03.919 --> 00:08:06.869
and I spoke about it. Um, and they can
00:08:06.879 --> 00:08:08.469
tell exactly how much there is there
00:08:08.479 --> 00:08:10.629
because you you can see the boundary
00:08:10.639 --> 00:08:12.390
with this sort of radar. You can see the
00:08:12.400 --> 00:08:14.070
boundary between an ice surface and a
00:08:14.080 --> 00:08:16.150
water surface. And that's crucial to
00:08:16.160 --> 00:08:18.629
doing this. So, this mission won't
00:08:18.639 --> 00:08:21.510
actually be looking for life, but it
00:08:21.520 --> 00:08:25.430
will be looking for uh the potential for
00:08:25.440 --> 00:08:28.629
life to perhaps exist on a on a moon
00:08:28.639 --> 00:08:30.230
like this.
00:08:30.240 --> 00:08:33.670
>> Exactly. So, as the as the blurb um on
00:08:33.680 --> 00:08:36.709
the NASA website says, uh it will help
00:08:36.719 --> 00:08:38.389
scientists investigate the chemical
00:08:38.399 --> 00:08:40.790
makeup of Europa's potentially habitable
00:08:40.800 --> 00:08:43.350
environment while minimizing the need to
00:08:43.360 --> 00:08:45.509
drill through layers of ice. So, that
00:08:45.519 --> 00:08:46.949
what they're going to try and do is as
00:08:46.959 --> 00:08:49.350
much as they can from orbit.
00:08:49.360 --> 00:08:52.470
Um and then you know if there's like if
00:08:52.480 --> 00:08:54.870
they find lipids and amino acids and all
00:08:54.880 --> 00:08:56.870
this sort of thing in the uh in the
00:08:56.880 --> 00:08:59.269
plumes of ice coming coming from Europa
00:08:59.279 --> 00:09:01.350
then clearly the next step will be a
00:09:01.360 --> 00:09:03.750
lander that starts digging holes in the
00:09:03.760 --> 00:09:04.070
ice.
00:09:04.080 --> 00:09:04.630
>> Yes.
00:09:04.640 --> 00:09:06.870
>> I mean you know before you do that the
00:09:06.880 --> 00:09:07.990
first thing you need to know is how
00:09:08.000 --> 00:09:09.030
thick the ice is.
00:09:09.040 --> 00:09:09.990
>> Yes.
00:09:10.000 --> 00:09:14.470
>> If it's a couple of miles thick
00:09:14.480 --> 00:09:15.990
>> actually a couple of miles is better
00:09:16.000 --> 00:09:17.190
than what they're expecting.
00:09:17.200 --> 00:09:20.550
>> Oh is that right? more like 25 or 30
00:09:20.560 --> 00:09:23.030
>> miles or kilometers. That's right.
00:09:23.040 --> 00:09:26.710
Choose your units. Um yes. So yes, a a
00:09:26.720 --> 00:09:29.829
thinish layer of ice would be pretty
00:09:29.839 --> 00:09:32.389
pretty um good to you know to cope with.
00:09:32.399 --> 00:09:34.150
You could probably do that. I mean by
00:09:34.160 --> 00:09:35.590
thin I mean less than a kilometer
00:09:35.600 --> 00:09:36.550
probably.
00:09:36.560 --> 00:09:39.110
>> Yes. But the likelihood is it's it's
00:09:39.120 --> 00:09:40.870
probably more. But I guess we'll we'll
00:09:40.880 --> 00:09:42.470
have to wait and see.
00:09:42.480 --> 00:09:44.389
>> The thing is and um Europa is covered in
00:09:44.399 --> 00:09:45.910
all these cracks that are that are
00:09:45.920 --> 00:09:47.590
brownish in color. Yes,
00:09:47.600 --> 00:09:49.509
>> that's thought to be the effect of
00:09:49.519 --> 00:09:52.150
sunlight on brine on basically on salt
00:09:52.160 --> 00:09:54.070
water. So, you've already got a hint
00:09:54.080 --> 00:09:57.030
there that it's probably a salty ocean
00:09:57.040 --> 00:09:58.389
underneath the surface.
00:09:58.399 --> 00:10:00.150
>> Well, salt's probably not that uncommon
00:10:00.160 --> 00:10:02.310
in the universe really. Um,
00:10:02.320 --> 00:10:03.350
>> that's right. It's not.
00:10:03.360 --> 00:10:05.910
>> It's one of one of the base materials,
00:10:05.920 --> 00:10:08.389
isn't it? Uh, of course, this doesn't
00:10:08.399 --> 00:10:09.990
guarantee they're actually going to go.
00:10:10.000 --> 00:10:12.230
This is just another step forward in the
00:10:12.240 --> 00:10:14.069
approval process. It it does. It does.
00:10:14.079 --> 00:10:16.230
Correct. very longitudinal process and
00:10:16.240 --> 00:10:18.389
they have to get over a lot of hurdles
00:10:18.399 --> 00:10:19.750
before they actually hit the launch
00:10:19.760 --> 00:10:22.550
button. So, uh hopefully they're um
00:10:22.560 --> 00:10:24.630
they're going to get there and u it's
00:10:24.640 --> 00:10:26.310
it's a long trip to
00:10:26.320 --> 00:10:27.590
>> Yes, it is. That's the other thing.
00:10:27.600 --> 00:10:29.030
>> So, they got to time it right. They've
00:10:29.040 --> 00:10:30.310
got to get in the right place at the
00:10:30.320 --> 00:10:31.030
right time.
00:10:31.040 --> 00:10:33.509
>> Exactly. All of the above. That's right.
00:10:33.519 --> 00:10:36.069
So, at least what it you know, at least
00:10:36.079 --> 00:10:37.829
uh it's not a knock back. That's the
00:10:37.839 --> 00:10:38.630
good news.
00:10:38.640 --> 00:10:40.470
>> Yes, indeed. All right. Well, we'll keep
00:10:40.480 --> 00:10:42.069
an eye on this story because I'm sure
00:10:42.079 --> 00:10:43.990
there'll be more to report in the not
00:10:44.000 --> 00:10:46.630
too distant future about a mission to
00:10:46.640 --> 00:10:49.590
Europa. You're listening to Space Nuts
00:10:49.600 --> 00:10:53.430
with Andrew Dunley and Fred Watson.
00:10:53.440 --> 00:10:54.949
Let's take a break from the show to tell
00:10:54.959 --> 00:10:58.630
you about our sponsor, Anti-gravity A1.
00:10:58.640 --> 00:11:00.550
Have you ever wished you could actually
00:11:00.560 --> 00:11:03.030
feel what it's like to fly? Not just
00:11:03.040 --> 00:11:04.710
control a drone from the ground, but
00:11:04.720 --> 00:11:07.509
truly experience the air around you.
00:11:07.519 --> 00:11:10.230
Well, that future has just arrived.
00:11:10.240 --> 00:11:13.030
Introducing the Anti-gravity A1, the
00:11:13.040 --> 00:11:16.949
world's first all-in-one 8K 360 drone,
00:11:16.959 --> 00:11:20.150
and it's officially available now. Uh,
00:11:20.160 --> 00:11:21.910
this isn't just another drone. It's an
00:11:21.920 --> 00:11:24.550
entirely new category. With Anti-Gravity
00:11:24.560 --> 00:11:27.110
A1, you don't fly by fiddling with
00:11:27.120 --> 00:11:29.430
sticks. You fly with your hands and your
00:11:29.440 --> 00:11:32.550
head. The vision goggles use ultrasharp
00:11:32.560 --> 00:11:35.829
dual micro OLED displays and the grip
00:11:35.839 --> 00:11:38.870
controllers free motion uh lets you
00:11:38.880 --> 00:11:41.110
literally point where you want to go.
00:11:41.120 --> 00:11:43.430
Look left, the drone looks left. Tilt
00:11:43.440 --> 00:11:46.230
your hand, it responds instantly. It's
00:11:46.240 --> 00:11:48.230
the most intuitive flight system ever
00:11:48.240 --> 00:11:51.350
created. Easy for beginners, but still
00:11:51.360 --> 00:11:54.150
offering full FPV uh controls for
00:11:54.160 --> 00:11:56.310
seasoned pilots.
00:11:56.320 --> 00:11:59.269
And the whole drone weighs in at just
00:11:59.279 --> 00:12:03.190
249 g. That means travel ready,
00:12:03.200 --> 00:12:05.509
regulation friendly, and it fits in the
00:12:05.519 --> 00:12:08.629
palm of your hand. Plus, anti-gravity A1
00:12:08.639 --> 00:12:11.670
is packed with smart tools. Sky Path,
00:12:11.680 --> 00:12:13.750
which lets you design and automate
00:12:13.760 --> 00:12:16.710
flight routes. Sky Genie, which performs
00:12:16.720 --> 00:12:19.590
complex flight moves with one tap, and
00:12:19.600 --> 00:12:21.829
Deep Track, which locks onto subjects
00:12:21.839 --> 00:12:24.310
with amazing precision. The Anti-Gravity
00:12:24.320 --> 00:12:26.710
A1 is now available in three bundles at
00:12:26.720 --> 00:12:29.110
the anti-gravity store, Best Buy, and
00:12:29.120 --> 00:12:31.829
authorized retailers worldwide. So, if
00:12:31.839 --> 00:12:33.990
you ever wanted to rethink what a drone
00:12:34.000 --> 00:12:37.190
can be, check out the anti-gravity A1.
00:12:37.200 --> 00:12:40.389
Just visit anti-gravity.te.
00:12:40.399 --> 00:12:42.870
That's anti-gravity.te.
00:12:42.880 --> 00:12:45.030
Or you can tap on the link in the show
00:12:45.040 --> 00:12:46.389
notes.
00:12:46.399 --> 00:12:48.310
>> Roger, you're here also.
00:12:48.320 --> 00:12:50.470
>> Space nuts. Now, Fred, we've uh
00:12:50.480 --> 00:12:52.069
discussed
00:12:52.079 --> 00:12:55.269
uh gravitational waves before and a few
00:12:55.279 --> 00:12:57.190
of those have been detected in recent
00:12:57.200 --> 00:13:01.030
times. Uh the problem with them is what
00:13:01.040 --> 00:13:04.870
is the cause? And now in a recently
00:13:04.880 --> 00:13:07.030
detected gravitational wave, they think
00:13:07.040 --> 00:13:10.230
they've got a candidate. That's that's
00:13:10.240 --> 00:13:11.750
right. This is so this is, you know,
00:13:11.760 --> 00:13:15.030
it's a an ongoing story. Uh what I like
00:13:15.040 --> 00:13:16.629
about this story is it's got a nice
00:13:16.639 --> 00:13:19.030
Australian component because there is um
00:13:19.040 --> 00:13:22.550
there's a a a basically a a
00:13:22.560 --> 00:13:24.230
collaboration here in Australia which is
00:13:24.240 --> 00:13:26.710
called Osgrav uh which is about
00:13:26.720 --> 00:13:28.470
gravitational waves. It's a you know
00:13:28.480 --> 00:13:30.629
kind of fairly predictable name but um
00:13:30.639 --> 00:13:32.389
it includes people from the Australian
00:13:32.399 --> 00:13:34.870
univers national university and I think
00:13:34.880 --> 00:13:36.710
University of Western Australia other
00:13:36.720 --> 00:13:38.629
places which are strong in gravitational
00:13:38.639 --> 00:13:41.829
wave astronomy. So um it's very nice
00:13:41.839 --> 00:13:43.829
that it has this Australian component.
00:13:43.839 --> 00:13:47.030
So what's the story? Well uh the large
00:13:47.040 --> 00:13:49.110
uh sorry the laser interferometer
00:13:49.120 --> 00:13:51.829
gravitational wave observatory otherwise
00:13:51.839 --> 00:13:55.110
known as LIGO um has been operating
00:13:55.120 --> 00:13:59.430
since uh 2015 in its uh sort of current
00:13:59.440 --> 00:14:01.110
state. It's actually technically called
00:14:01.120 --> 00:14:03.750
advanced LIGO because I think it took 15
00:14:03.760 --> 00:14:05.670
years of de of development to get to
00:14:05.680 --> 00:14:08.949
this stage. But that but they have uh
00:14:08.959 --> 00:14:11.990
now not quite regularly but at fairly
00:14:12.000 --> 00:14:14.710
infrequent intervals sorry fairly
00:14:14.720 --> 00:14:17.110
moderately moderate intervals let me put
00:14:17.120 --> 00:14:18.790
it that way they've been detecting
00:14:18.800 --> 00:14:21.269
gravitational wave events and for the
00:14:21.279 --> 00:14:22.790
last couple of years they've had an
00:14:22.800 --> 00:14:24.310
additional string to their bow. Remember
00:14:24.320 --> 00:14:25.750
there are two of these detectors at
00:14:25.760 --> 00:14:29.430
opposite corners of the United States um
00:14:29.440 --> 00:14:33.030
which um you need because uh otherwise
00:14:33.040 --> 00:14:34.550
you've got no idea where these things
00:14:34.560 --> 00:14:36.310
come from or even if they're real. you
00:14:36.320 --> 00:14:38.629
need to see the gravitational wave pass
00:14:38.639 --> 00:14:40.310
one and then the other with the right
00:14:40.320 --> 00:14:42.949
kind of time interval in between. Um but
00:14:42.959 --> 00:14:44.550
they've been joined in the last few
00:14:44.560 --> 00:14:47.509
years by something called uh uh Virgo
00:14:47.519 --> 00:14:49.189
which uh in fact I think it's called
00:14:49.199 --> 00:14:51.509
advanced Virgo like advanced LIGO. Virgo
00:14:51.519 --> 00:14:53.750
is an Italian gravitational wave
00:14:53.760 --> 00:14:55.350
detector. And of course having three
00:14:55.360 --> 00:14:58.150
detectors widely spread over the surface
00:14:58.160 --> 00:14:59.670
of the earth means you can pinpoint
00:14:59.680 --> 00:15:01.750
things much more accurately in in terms
00:15:01.760 --> 00:15:03.110
of the direction in which these
00:15:03.120 --> 00:15:05.269
gravitational waves come in from. tri
00:15:05.279 --> 00:15:07.189
triangulating the signal.
00:15:07.199 --> 00:15:10.470
>> Exactly. That's exactly what it is. Um,
00:15:10.480 --> 00:15:12.470
what's interesting about this one though
00:15:12.480 --> 00:15:16.870
is that the signal seems to be from a
00:15:16.880 --> 00:15:21.430
black hole absorbing a neutron star.
00:15:21.440 --> 00:15:24.310
>> Um, we actually had a false alarm on
00:15:24.320 --> 00:15:27.030
this, which is embarrassing because um,
00:15:27.040 --> 00:15:28.870
my book has just gone to the printer
00:15:28.880 --> 00:15:30.870
saying, "Yes, we've observed a neutron
00:15:30.880 --> 00:15:33.189
star being absorbed by a black hole."
00:15:33.199 --> 00:15:36.069
Um, and that that I think disappeared
00:15:36.079 --> 00:15:38.310
because it turned out to be um
00:15:38.320 --> 00:15:40.389
terrestrial noise. It was sort of, you
00:15:40.399 --> 00:15:41.750
know, so I don't know whether it was a
00:15:41.760 --> 00:15:44.069
train going underneath
00:15:44.079 --> 00:15:44.470
probably
00:15:44.480 --> 00:15:46.230
>> or Yeah, something like that. That's the
00:15:46.240 --> 00:15:48.470
usual story, isn't it? A microwave oven.
00:15:48.480 --> 00:15:51.110
Um that was earlier this year. And and
00:15:51.120 --> 00:15:54.069
that um has now gone away, but it looks
00:15:54.079 --> 00:15:57.350
as though this one might actually be the
00:15:57.360 --> 00:15:59.430
real thing, a black hole and a neutron
00:15:59.440 --> 00:16:01.670
star. Uh we've had two black holes
00:16:01.680 --> 00:16:04.870
merging. Uh that's that's probably been
00:16:04.880 --> 00:16:07.030
the commonest source of gravitational
00:16:07.040 --> 00:16:08.710
waves. There've been several of those.
00:16:08.720 --> 00:16:10.389
We've had a couple of neutron stars
00:16:10.399 --> 00:16:12.790
merging as well. And that actually comes
00:16:12.800 --> 00:16:15.189
with celestial fireworks that you can
00:16:15.199 --> 00:16:18.069
observe with other types of telescope
00:16:18.079 --> 00:16:20.150
like neutrino telescopes, visible light
00:16:20.160 --> 00:16:22.230
telescopes, radio telescopes, x-ray
00:16:22.240 --> 00:16:25.110
telescopes, all of the above. Um and
00:16:25.120 --> 00:16:27.509
that was a big story actually late last
00:16:27.519 --> 00:16:30.629
year if I remember rightly. But um until
00:16:30.639 --> 00:16:34.629
now we haven't had a confirmed um uh
00:16:34.639 --> 00:16:36.790
observation of a neutron star being
00:16:36.800 --> 00:16:38.310
absorbed by a black hole and we still
00:16:38.320 --> 00:16:41.509
don't have it's still a bit speculative
00:16:41.519 --> 00:16:44.069
but from the masses that are inferred by
00:16:44.079 --> 00:16:45.749
the signal and remember what you get is
00:16:45.759 --> 00:16:49.670
this weird gravitational chirp uh it's
00:16:49.680 --> 00:16:53.110
the frequency of a sound wave going
00:16:53.120 --> 00:16:55.749
as the two things come together. Um, and
00:16:55.759 --> 00:16:57.590
it's that that gives you all the details
00:16:57.600 --> 00:16:59.829
of what it is that that are colliding.
00:16:59.839 --> 00:17:02.389
The suspicion is it's two objects, one
00:17:02.399 --> 00:17:05.510
of which is three solar masses and the
00:17:05.520 --> 00:17:09.350
other is five solar masses. I think I'm
00:17:09.360 --> 00:17:11.669
right in saying that. I uh should check
00:17:11.679 --> 00:17:14.870
those numbers. But anyway, uh that is
00:17:14.880 --> 00:17:17.590
the current uh expectation of what is
00:17:17.600 --> 00:17:20.150
colliding. So something three solar
00:17:20.160 --> 00:17:23.270
masses would have to be a neutron star
00:17:23.280 --> 00:17:26.870
because it's too lightweight uh to be a
00:17:26.880 --> 00:17:29.990
black hole. And so that is what's making
00:17:30.000 --> 00:17:33.830
this interesting. What's what's perhaps
00:17:33.840 --> 00:17:36.310
um a bit surprising
00:17:36.320 --> 00:17:39.909
uh it's is that you might expect there
00:17:39.919 --> 00:17:42.310
to be once again uh radiation coming
00:17:42.320 --> 00:17:43.669
from this of you know not just
00:17:43.679 --> 00:17:46.870
gravitational radiation but uh noise in
00:17:46.880 --> 00:17:50.310
the x-ray spectrum or neutron neutrinos
00:17:50.320 --> 00:17:52.870
uh particles things of that sort but it
00:17:52.880 --> 00:17:57.669
but it hasn't been observed and um the
00:17:57.679 --> 00:18:00.870
one of the Australian astronomers uh Um
00:18:00.880 --> 00:18:02.150
I've forgotten her first name. That's
00:18:02.160 --> 00:18:04.310
embarrassing, isn't it? Susan Susan
00:18:04.320 --> 00:18:07.669
Scott. Uh she's at um ANU, Australian
00:18:07.679 --> 00:18:12.470
National University. Uh she says that uh
00:18:12.480 --> 00:18:14.549
I if she well what she says is we've
00:18:14.559 --> 00:18:15.990
looked for light signatures of the
00:18:16.000 --> 00:18:17.590
event, but no one has found any up to
00:18:17.600 --> 00:18:19.909
this point. That indicates that if it is
00:18:19.919 --> 00:18:22.310
a black hole and a neutron star, then
00:18:22.320 --> 00:18:24.710
very likely the neutron star has been
00:18:24.720 --> 00:18:27.830
swallowed whole by the black hole. Uh uh
00:18:27.840 --> 00:18:29.990
he said and she says this could happen
00:18:30.000 --> 00:18:32.870
if the objects were of different masses.
00:18:32.880 --> 00:18:35.350
So it's the smaller object gets sucked
00:18:35.360 --> 00:18:37.029
in more quickly and and is swallowed
00:18:37.039 --> 00:18:39.029
whole. So you know it's not strung out
00:18:39.039 --> 00:18:43.190
into into this um mess of material uh
00:18:43.200 --> 00:18:46.710
that does emit um signals in the
00:18:46.720 --> 00:18:49.909
electromagnetic uh wave bands. Uh if it
00:18:49.919 --> 00:18:52.230
gets sucked in hole maybe you don't get
00:18:52.240 --> 00:18:53.909
any signal at all except for the
00:18:53.919 --> 00:18:55.350
gravitational wave signal.
00:18:55.360 --> 00:18:55.750
extraordinary.
00:18:55.760 --> 00:18:59.190
>> How how sudden would the impact be? I
00:18:59.200 --> 00:19:01.669
mean, you know, neutron stars, we've
00:19:01.679 --> 00:19:03.830
talked about them, and they're pretty
00:19:03.840 --> 00:19:06.549
volatile individuals and and quite
00:19:06.559 --> 00:19:08.630
dense. Um,
00:19:08.640 --> 00:19:10.870
>> quite quite dense is just a slight
00:19:10.880 --> 00:19:12.870
understatement there.
00:19:12.880 --> 00:19:16.310
>> Yes, indeed. Um, so, so
00:19:16.320 --> 00:19:18.549
I imagine it would be quite a cathlymic
00:19:18.559 --> 00:19:19.350
collision.
00:19:19.360 --> 00:19:22.390
>> Yeah, that's right. Um in fact so when
00:19:22.400 --> 00:19:25.110
you've got two black holes um what you
00:19:25.120 --> 00:19:26.789
get at the end of it is a more massive
00:19:26.799 --> 00:19:28.150
black hole
00:19:28.160 --> 00:19:30.950
>> uh and um you're talking there though
00:19:30.960 --> 00:19:32.710
about
00:19:32.720 --> 00:19:34.549
you know infinitely small infinite
00:19:34.559 --> 00:19:37.350
decimally small points merging uh their
00:19:37.360 --> 00:19:39.830
event horizon there are two event
00:19:39.840 --> 00:19:41.830
horizons merge as well and you get
00:19:41.840 --> 00:19:43.190
something called a ring down where the
00:19:43.200 --> 00:19:45.990
event horizon itself vibrates
00:19:46.000 --> 00:19:48.470
um I think with a neutron star you
00:19:48.480 --> 00:19:50.230
wouldn't have the event horizon
00:19:50.240 --> 00:19:52.070
But it will be possible for the the
00:19:52.080 --> 00:19:54.070
neutron star just basically to disappear
00:19:54.080 --> 00:19:55.830
over the black holes event horizon. You
00:19:55.840 --> 00:19:58.150
don't see anything. But neutron stars
00:19:58.160 --> 00:19:59.430
themselves as you and I have talked
00:19:59.440 --> 00:20:01.270
about many times are active in the sense
00:20:01.280 --> 00:20:03.430
that they've got highly intense magnetic
00:20:03.440 --> 00:20:05.990
fields on their surfaces and they beam
00:20:06.000 --> 00:20:08.390
this radiation out which we see as as
00:20:08.400 --> 00:20:10.549
pulsars. So they're not they're not
00:20:10.559 --> 00:20:12.950
particularly quiet things. I mean, this
00:20:12.960 --> 00:20:15.750
thing could be a pulsar whose lighthouse
00:20:15.760 --> 00:20:18.310
beam of radiation is missing the Earth,
00:20:18.320 --> 00:20:20.390
if if I can put it that way, because the
00:20:20.400 --> 00:20:22.230
only reason we see pulsars is when
00:20:22.240 --> 00:20:25.510
you've got a neutron star whose uh beams
00:20:25.520 --> 00:20:27.510
of radiation from their poles actually
00:20:27.520 --> 00:20:29.190
sweeps across the Earth. And that, of
00:20:29.200 --> 00:20:31.750
course, is a particular uh circumstance.
00:20:31.760 --> 00:20:34.630
Maybe this one wasn't like that and it's
00:20:34.640 --> 00:20:37.350
just got chewed up uh and we haven't kn
00:20:37.360 --> 00:20:39.909
we haven't seen it its demise other than
00:20:39.919 --> 00:20:41.830
in the gravitational waves. I think
00:20:41.840 --> 00:20:43.750
there'll be more about this story Andrew
00:20:43.760 --> 00:20:46.070
and um I hope you and I can bring it to
00:20:46.080 --> 00:20:48.950
our uh our space nuts listener or
00:20:48.960 --> 00:20:50.070
listeners
00:20:50.080 --> 00:20:52.549
>> our fraternity.
00:20:52.559 --> 00:20:55.909
>> Yes. Uh well it's it um you know the the
00:20:55.919 --> 00:20:58.710
more we can gather in terms of data uh
00:20:58.720 --> 00:21:01.350
on gravitational waves the the more we
00:21:01.360 --> 00:21:04.549
will learn and who knows what sort of
00:21:04.559 --> 00:21:06.149
problems it could solve down the track.
00:21:06.159 --> 00:21:07.110
So
00:21:07.120 --> 00:21:09.430
>> exactly it's always my comment that you
00:21:09.440 --> 00:21:11.270
never know what you're what you've
00:21:11.280 --> 00:21:13.029
setting in store for the future from all
00:21:13.039 --> 00:21:13.990
this knowledge.
00:21:14.000 --> 00:21:16.230
>> Exactly. Yeah. I mean you just gather
00:21:16.240 --> 00:21:18.470
the knowledge one day it might just go
00:21:18.480 --> 00:21:19.990
you know a penny will drop with someone
00:21:20.000 --> 00:21:21.190
else maybe
00:21:21.200 --> 00:21:23.110
>> a generation down the track. Who knows?
00:21:23.120 --> 00:21:24.870
It's it's all useful.
00:21:24.880 --> 00:21:26.549
>> And even if it's not, it's good to be
00:21:26.559 --> 00:21:28.149
able to gather it and
00:21:28.159 --> 00:21:30.870
>> well, they use it some some way.
00:21:30.880 --> 00:21:32.950
>> It it's um you know, all these things
00:21:32.960 --> 00:21:34.950
are constantly testing Einstein's theory
00:21:34.960 --> 00:21:38.470
of relativity. And that's um very
00:21:38.480 --> 00:21:39.750
important because we know there's
00:21:39.760 --> 00:21:40.870
something wrong with it, but we haven't
00:21:40.880 --> 00:21:42.710
found anything wrong with it yet. Even
00:21:42.720 --> 00:21:44.390
though it's been tested within an inch
00:21:44.400 --> 00:21:47.110
of its life, it still holds up.
00:21:47.120 --> 00:21:49.510
>> Yeah. Fascinating. All right. Stop.
00:21:49.520 --> 00:21:51.110
>> You're listening to the Space Nuts
00:21:51.120 --> 00:21:53.430
podcast with Andrew Dunley and Fred
00:21:53.440 --> 00:21:56.549
Watson.
00:21:56.559 --> 00:21:58.710
>> Okay, we checked all four systems and
00:21:58.720 --> 00:21:59.510
being with the girls.
00:21:59.520 --> 00:22:00.390
>> Space Nuts.
00:22:00.400 --> 00:22:02.310
>> Now, Fred, I do want to shout out once
00:22:02.320 --> 00:22:06.310
again to our patrons. Uh, the number 39
00:22:06.320 --> 00:22:08.710
now. Uh, thank you so much for
00:22:08.720 --> 00:22:11.110
supporting the Space Nuts podcast. We so
00:22:11.120 --> 00:22:13.029
appreciate it. And if you're interested
00:22:13.039 --> 00:22:15.350
in becoming a patron, you can do so at
00:22:15.360 --> 00:22:17.909
patreon.com/spacenuts.
00:22:17.919 --> 00:22:21.669
That's patreon.com/spacenuts.
00:22:21.679 --> 00:22:24.310
And uh thank you to everybody who has
00:22:24.320 --> 00:22:27.270
joined the Spacenuts podcast group. They
00:22:27.280 --> 00:22:29.669
number in their hundreds now, Fred.
00:22:29.679 --> 00:22:31.669
>> We've only had the page going for a bit
00:22:31.679 --> 00:22:33.909
over a week and already we've we've
00:22:33.919 --> 00:22:35.669
tracked the century.
00:22:35.679 --> 00:22:38.630
>> And have over 100 people that are all
00:22:38.640 --> 00:22:40.870
Space Nuts fans who are all now talking
00:22:40.880 --> 00:22:42.789
to each other and uh answering each
00:22:42.799 --> 00:22:45.270
other's questions and uh having a fair
00:22:45.280 --> 00:22:47.430
bit of fun. So, it's I'm so pleased we
00:22:47.440 --> 00:22:49.830
were able to put um those people
00:22:49.840 --> 00:22:51.590
together and uh who knows friends
00:22:51.600 --> 00:22:54.230
friendships may be forged
00:22:54.240 --> 00:22:56.630
>> um or collaborations that might solve
00:22:56.640 --> 00:22:58.070
some of the mysteries of the universe.
00:22:58.080 --> 00:23:00.390
Who knows? Uh that would be a lovely
00:23:00.400 --> 00:23:03.110
legacy. I think uh let's um
00:23:03.120 --> 00:23:05.669
>> and of course if you would like to be a
00:23:05.679 --> 00:23:07.669
uh a member of the Space Nuts podcast
00:23:07.679 --> 00:23:10.630
group um just find it. It's on Facebook
00:23:10.640 --> 00:23:12.310
uh Space Nuts podcast group in your
00:23:12.320 --> 00:23:14.789
search engine. And um yes, just ask to
00:23:14.799 --> 00:23:17.110
join and we will click the approve
00:23:17.120 --> 00:23:19.110
button. Everybody seems to be
00:23:19.120 --> 00:23:21.029
like-minded and enjoying themselves. So
00:23:21.039 --> 00:23:23.430
uh that's what it's all about.
00:23:23.440 --> 00:23:27.110
Now Fred, some questions, if you will.
00:23:27.120 --> 00:23:29.750
Um hello again, fellow nutters. I have a
00:23:29.760 --> 00:23:32.310
question. I'm hoping you can help me um
00:23:32.320 --> 00:23:35.110
understanding an old chestnut. Black
00:23:35.120 --> 00:23:37.669
holes. If a black hole is an infinite
00:23:37.679 --> 00:23:39.510
dense point, why does it have a
00:23:39.520 --> 00:23:41.350
diameter? I don't understand why
00:23:41.360 --> 00:23:43.190
astronomers refer to black holes by
00:23:43.200 --> 00:23:45.190
their size in terms of diameter when
00:23:45.200 --> 00:23:47.350
it's meant to be a point of infinite des
00:23:47.360 --> 00:23:49.669
uh density. Are they mistakenly
00:23:49.679 --> 00:23:52.390
referring to the event horizon? Mario
00:23:52.400 --> 00:23:54.470
from Melbourne. Hello Mario. Thanks for
00:23:54.480 --> 00:23:57.110
the question. And the answer is yes.
00:23:57.120 --> 00:23:58.549
Thank you Mario. Thanks for the
00:23:58.559 --> 00:24:02.390
question. Um Mario then goes on to you
00:24:02.400 --> 00:24:04.789
know everything he says is absolutely
00:24:04.799 --> 00:24:07.830
right that um uh if you've got a a a
00:24:07.840 --> 00:24:10.310
point of infinite density it's got zero
00:24:10.320 --> 00:24:13.110
dimensions so you can't refer to its
00:24:13.120 --> 00:24:15.909
diameter. Uh what you can refer to is
00:24:15.919 --> 00:24:19.190
its mass because the the mass is uh is
00:24:19.200 --> 00:24:22.710
variable. uh but the fact that it has no
00:24:22.720 --> 00:24:25.269
volume means that when you you know when
00:24:25.279 --> 00:24:26.789
you look at the mass per unit volume
00:24:26.799 --> 00:24:28.470
you've got something of infinite density
00:24:28.480 --> 00:24:31.110
which is how density is defined. So
00:24:31.120 --> 00:24:33.830
Mario is absolutely right. Uh what does
00:24:33.840 --> 00:24:36.310
vary though with the mass is the event
00:24:36.320 --> 00:24:37.909
horizon the diameter of the event
00:24:37.919 --> 00:24:39.269
horizon which you and I have spoken
00:24:39.279 --> 00:24:44.230
about before. Um it's uh uh it's a a
00:24:44.240 --> 00:24:47.750
quantity that I I suppose is important
00:24:47.760 --> 00:24:51.269
because if we are observing an um a
00:24:51.279 --> 00:24:53.029
black hole as we did with the event
00:24:53.039 --> 00:24:54.549
horizon telescope then that's what you
00:24:54.559 --> 00:24:56.549
see. Uh so a big one's going to be
00:24:56.559 --> 00:24:58.149
easier to observe than a smaller one and
00:24:58.159 --> 00:25:00.310
that's why a super massive black hole uh
00:25:00.320 --> 00:25:02.710
in the center of a galaxy called M87 was
00:25:02.720 --> 00:25:04.870
chosen for the the first target for that
00:25:04.880 --> 00:25:07.110
event horizon telescope. But no Mario
00:25:07.120 --> 00:25:09.909
you're quite right. Um it is that uh
00:25:09.919 --> 00:25:11.590
astronomers when if they talk about the
00:25:11.600 --> 00:25:13.190
diameter of a black hole and that
00:25:13.200 --> 00:25:15.510
probably includes me as well uh are
00:25:15.520 --> 00:25:17.190
actually really referring to the event
00:25:17.200 --> 00:25:18.870
horizon because that's the that's the
00:25:18.880 --> 00:25:21.350
parameter. And I love the way Mario
00:25:21.360 --> 00:25:23.430
signs off by saying thanks in advance to
00:25:23.440 --> 00:25:26.950
Dave and Fred although he does say aka
00:25:26.960 --> 00:25:28.070
Andrew.
00:25:28.080 --> 00:25:29.590
>> Yes, that one's going to stick for a
00:25:29.600 --> 00:25:35.110
while. Sorry to say. Thank you Mario.
00:25:35.120 --> 00:25:37.590
Moving on. Uh hi Andrew and Fred. It's
00:25:37.600 --> 00:25:39.350
Andrew from Newcastle with another
00:25:39.360 --> 00:25:41.830
question if I may. Just watched a doco
00:25:41.840 --> 00:25:43.430
on the quest to capture the first
00:25:43.440 --> 00:25:45.909
photograph of a black hole. Uh rather
00:25:45.919 --> 00:25:48.070
accurately the shadow of a black hole as
00:25:48.080 --> 00:25:50.390
Fred so eloquently explained and I
00:25:50.400 --> 00:25:53.029
didn't understand one thing amongst
00:25:53.039 --> 00:25:54.789
others of course with the multiple
00:25:54.799 --> 00:25:56.470
observatories around the world and the
00:25:56.480 --> 00:25:58.390
use of atomic clocks to synchronize the
00:25:58.400 --> 00:26:01.669
data acquisition. Why were they uh on
00:26:01.679 --> 00:26:04.710
tender hooks uh regarding the weather at
00:26:04.720 --> 00:26:07.029
all the sites with bad weather at just
00:26:07.039 --> 00:26:09.110
one putting the whole venture in peril?
00:26:09.120 --> 00:26:11.190
I understand from the show and other
00:26:11.200 --> 00:26:13.110
sources that they were collecting radio
00:26:13.120 --> 00:26:15.510
wavelength data and I thought that this
00:26:15.520 --> 00:26:17.350
was unaffected by the weather and
00:26:17.360 --> 00:26:19.909
atmospheric conditions. I thought that
00:26:19.919 --> 00:26:22.070
was the intrinsic beauty of radio
00:26:22.080 --> 00:26:24.470
astronomy day and night rain and shine.
00:26:24.480 --> 00:26:27.430
Hope you can enlighten me. Wait for it
00:26:27.440 --> 00:26:30.390
but over the radio. Dear, oh dear. H
00:26:30.400 --> 00:26:32.710
Andrew Broadhost. Thank you, Andrew.
00:26:32.720 --> 00:26:34.149
>> That's a great question, Andrew. Leave
00:26:34.159 --> 00:26:37.830
the jokes to me, man.
00:26:37.840 --> 00:26:39.669
>> Yeah. Well, I always leave them to you.
00:26:39.679 --> 00:26:41.669
So,
00:26:41.679 --> 00:26:43.669
>> um if they're good.
00:26:43.679 --> 00:26:45.990
>> Oh gosh. When was the last Oh, never
00:26:46.000 --> 00:26:47.990
mind.
00:26:48.000 --> 00:26:49.909
Uh Andrew's on the money there is, you
00:26:49.919 --> 00:26:51.430
know, I thought radio waves were
00:26:51.440 --> 00:26:53.269
unaffected by the weather. And the
00:26:53.279 --> 00:26:54.870
answer is that radio waves come in
00:26:54.880 --> 00:26:58.149
different flavors. Uh and so what you
00:26:58.159 --> 00:27:01.029
might call low frequency radio waves um
00:27:01.039 --> 00:27:03.510
which are still relatively you know
00:27:03.520 --> 00:27:05.590
they're way outside the medium wave band
00:27:05.600 --> 00:27:07.990
of radio and things of that sort but low
00:27:08.000 --> 00:27:10.870
frequency in radio astronomy um I guess
00:27:10.880 --> 00:27:12.789
goes up to a couple of gigahertz or
00:27:12.799 --> 00:27:15.750
something like that. Um those are
00:27:15.760 --> 00:27:17.990
largely unaffected by weather. That's
00:27:18.000 --> 00:27:19.669
absolutely right. So that's why it can
00:27:19.679 --> 00:27:21.990
be pouring down at parks at the radio
00:27:22.000 --> 00:27:23.669
dish there and the astronomers are still
00:27:23.679 --> 00:27:25.909
happily observing through that. But the
00:27:25.919 --> 00:27:27.830
event horizon telescope used higher
00:27:27.840 --> 00:27:31.029
frequencies. Uh in fact one of the
00:27:31.039 --> 00:27:33.190
telescopes that was incorporated into it
00:27:33.200 --> 00:27:35.669
was ALMA the Atakama large millimeter
00:27:35.679 --> 00:27:38.470
array which has featured very uh very
00:27:38.480 --> 00:27:40.950
widely on space notes. That is a high
00:27:40.960 --> 00:27:42.630
frequency
00:27:42.640 --> 00:27:46.149
uh radio array. In fact they have
00:27:46.159 --> 00:27:49.350
receivers that go up to uh more than 900
00:27:49.360 --> 00:27:51.350
gigahertz. So that's like, you know,
00:27:51.360 --> 00:27:53.350
nearly a thousand times higher
00:27:53.360 --> 00:27:54.870
frequencies than what we've just been
00:27:54.880 --> 00:27:56.950
talking about. And at those sorts of
00:27:56.960 --> 00:27:59.909
frequencies, uh, the weather plays a
00:27:59.919 --> 00:28:02.870
very important role because water vapor
00:28:02.880 --> 00:28:05.510
actually dramatically absorbs the
00:28:05.520 --> 00:28:07.990
microwave signals. And that's what
00:28:08.000 --> 00:28:09.510
experienced that watching satellite
00:28:09.520 --> 00:28:12.950
television. If there is a storm and it
00:28:12.960 --> 00:28:14.789
rains heavily, the wavelengths of the
00:28:14.799 --> 00:28:17.029
raindrops can absorb the signals from
00:28:17.039 --> 00:28:19.750
the satellite and you get nothing.
00:28:19.760 --> 00:28:21.590
That's interesting. I've never tried to
00:28:21.600 --> 00:28:24.149
watch satellite television, so that's
00:28:24.159 --> 00:28:25.430
good thing to know.
00:28:25.440 --> 00:28:26.230
>> Um,
00:28:26.240 --> 00:28:27.990
>> it's one of the pitfalls.
00:28:28.000 --> 00:28:29.750
>> Yes. Yes. In fact, I seldom watch
00:28:29.760 --> 00:28:31.510
television at all. So, that's probably
00:28:31.520 --> 00:28:35.269
why. Um, but but the bottom line is um,
00:28:35.279 --> 00:28:38.549
you know, it's why facilities like ALMA
00:28:38.559 --> 00:28:40.789
and some of the other radio telescopes
00:28:40.799 --> 00:28:44.389
that were used uh to to to be become the
00:28:44.399 --> 00:28:45.750
event horizon telescope, it's why
00:28:45.760 --> 00:28:48.070
they're all at high altitudes. Alma is
00:28:48.080 --> 00:28:51.830
at almost 5,000 meters above sea level.
00:28:51.840 --> 00:28:55.430
Um that's you know 15 16,000 feet and at
00:28:55.440 --> 00:28:57.750
that height there is very little water
00:28:57.760 --> 00:28:59.990
vapor in the atmosphere. Uh but you can
00:29:00.000 --> 00:29:01.830
still get weather and that's why they
00:29:01.840 --> 00:29:03.590
were indeed on tent hooks about the
00:29:03.600 --> 00:29:05.269
weather because they don't want any of
00:29:05.279 --> 00:29:09.110
these if you lose one of those arrays
00:29:09.120 --> 00:29:10.310
and I think there were eight of them
00:29:10.320 --> 00:29:12.070
that came together all around one
00:29:12.080 --> 00:29:14.870
hemisphere of the earth uh to to to make
00:29:14.880 --> 00:29:17.029
up the event horizon telescope. if you
00:29:17.039 --> 00:29:19.430
lose one of them, you lose a significant
00:29:19.440 --> 00:29:21.350
amount of your ability to reconstruct
00:29:21.360 --> 00:29:23.590
the image that they're seeing. Uh, and
00:29:23.600 --> 00:29:25.269
so that was why they were worried that
00:29:25.279 --> 00:29:26.870
the the weather on just one of them
00:29:26.880 --> 00:29:30.230
might be uh moist uh or damper than they
00:29:30.240 --> 00:29:31.669
can cope with and that would have
00:29:31.679 --> 00:29:33.269
screwed up the whole thing. But as it
00:29:33.279 --> 00:29:35.110
happened, it wasn't. It didn't happen
00:29:35.120 --> 00:29:36.549
and it was great.
00:29:36.559 --> 00:29:38.549
>> They got global good weather.
00:29:38.559 --> 00:29:40.149
>> They did global good weather at these
00:29:40.159 --> 00:29:41.510
high altitude sites. That's right.
00:29:41.520 --> 00:29:42.950
>> Did the job. All right, there you are,
00:29:42.960 --> 00:29:45.909
Andrew. Uh, thank you for your question.
00:29:45.919 --> 00:29:47.909
And we've got one more we'll squeeze in
00:29:47.919 --> 00:29:50.710
from John Spoo. I hope I pronounced that
00:29:50.720 --> 00:29:52.070
correctly. John, thanks for your
00:29:52.080 --> 00:29:53.669
question. Hi, I have a question that's
00:29:53.679 --> 00:29:55.430
been bugging me for some time and I need
00:29:55.440 --> 00:29:58.310
an expert to help me out. I think we
00:29:58.320 --> 00:30:00.230
should stop there, Fred.
00:30:00.240 --> 00:30:01.830
>> There's nobody here, is there? Who's
00:30:01.840 --> 00:30:03.190
that? Hang on, I'll go and see if I can
00:30:03.200 --> 00:30:04.149
find somebody.
00:30:04.159 --> 00:30:05.909
>> Maybe the cat could probably answer this
00:30:05.919 --> 00:30:09.190
one. Now, um, imagine a spaceship
00:30:09.200 --> 00:30:11.110
traveling close to the speed of light.
00:30:11.120 --> 00:30:12.710
Disregarding that we don't have that
00:30:12.720 --> 00:30:15.029
sort of propulsion just yet, would the
00:30:15.039 --> 00:30:18.870
increase in its relativistic mass at
00:30:18.880 --> 00:30:20.789
some point turn the spaceship into a
00:30:20.799 --> 00:30:24.070
black hole? And if so, would that spell
00:30:24.080 --> 00:30:26.070
the end of the ship and its crew? Or
00:30:26.080 --> 00:30:27.990
would they be able to slow down to
00:30:28.000 --> 00:30:30.389
reverse the process? What a great
00:30:30.399 --> 00:30:30.870
question.
00:30:30.880 --> 00:30:32.470
>> It is a fantastic question. Do you want
00:30:32.480 --> 00:30:33.669
to have a go at it?
00:30:33.679 --> 00:30:35.909
>> Uh, the answer is no.
00:30:35.919 --> 00:30:37.830
>> It is. You got right. Yeah, you were
00:30:37.840 --> 00:30:39.190
right on the money there. See, see,
00:30:39.200 --> 00:30:40.789
there is an expert. It's called Andrew
00:30:40.799 --> 00:30:42.630
Dunley or Dave
00:30:42.640 --> 00:30:45.750
>> 50/50 chance.
00:30:45.760 --> 00:30:49.510
>> Um, it's a great question and it it the
00:30:49.520 --> 00:30:52.630
answer is a little bit prosaic I think
00:30:52.640 --> 00:30:55.990
and that is that in the in the rest
00:30:56.000 --> 00:30:58.149
frame of the spacecraft
00:30:58.159 --> 00:30:59.990
you know so if you're on the spacecraft
00:31:00.000 --> 00:31:01.590
and you're going at almost the speed of
00:31:01.600 --> 00:31:05.110
light your mass doesn't change. It's
00:31:05.120 --> 00:31:09.110
only in the rest frame of a a stationary
00:31:09.120 --> 00:31:10.549
observer. And by that I mean somebody
00:31:10.559 --> 00:31:12.789
watching you go past. Somebody watches
00:31:12.799 --> 00:31:15.830
you hurl past and your mass gets very
00:31:15.840 --> 00:31:19.110
much higher to the observer.
00:31:19.120 --> 00:31:22.389
>> But to the the inhabitants of the
00:31:22.399 --> 00:31:24.470
spacecraft or the spacecraft itself,
00:31:24.480 --> 00:31:25.669
your mass doesn't change.
00:31:25.679 --> 00:31:27.590
>> It's you're still normal.
00:31:27.600 --> 00:31:29.830
>> Still normal. Yeah. So and the same
00:31:29.840 --> 00:31:31.909
story is true with time dilation. You
00:31:31.919 --> 00:31:33.909
know you're you know that when you go
00:31:33.919 --> 00:31:36.230
nearer the speed of light, your clocks
00:31:36.240 --> 00:31:39.110
tick slower. Uh that's a scene by a
00:31:39.120 --> 00:31:41.909
stationary observer. Uh and so it's the
00:31:41.919 --> 00:31:43.190
same sort of thing. If you're on the
00:31:43.200 --> 00:31:44.789
spacecraft, your clock is ticking at the
00:31:44.799 --> 00:31:46.789
same rate as it ever was. But to a
00:31:46.799 --> 00:31:48.470
stationary observer, your clocks tick
00:31:48.480 --> 00:31:48.950
slower.
00:31:48.960 --> 00:31:50.710
>> And this has been proven with atomic
00:31:50.720 --> 00:31:51.830
clocks, hasn't it?
00:31:51.840 --> 00:31:53.909
>> It has. And indeed with mass as well.
00:31:53.919 --> 00:31:55.669
You can do this. You can see this sort
00:31:55.679 --> 00:31:59.350
of phenomenon with um uh with uh cosmic
00:31:59.360 --> 00:32:01.269
rays which travel very close to the
00:32:01.279 --> 00:32:02.630
speed of light. You can see their mass
00:32:02.640 --> 00:32:06.230
change. So, um, that's from the point of
00:32:06.240 --> 00:32:08.230
view of somebody who's, you know, not
00:32:08.240 --> 00:32:09.990
moving at the same speed. If you're
00:32:10.000 --> 00:32:11.750
moving at the same speed, you don't see
00:32:11.760 --> 00:32:13.750
any change at all.
00:32:13.760 --> 00:32:14.789
>> That's pretty boring.
00:32:14.799 --> 00:32:16.950
>> I mean, the more the more we discuss
00:32:16.960 --> 00:32:18.630
black holes and the number of questions
00:32:18.640 --> 00:32:21.350
we get about them, people are really
00:32:21.360 --> 00:32:25.029
quite captivated by the strangeness of
00:32:25.039 --> 00:32:27.110
them. I suppose they they throw up all
00:32:27.120 --> 00:32:29.750
these things that seem so alien to what
00:32:29.760 --> 00:32:32.230
we consider normal. Uh, and that's
00:32:32.240 --> 00:32:35.110
because we've only experienced uh what's
00:32:35.120 --> 00:32:37.269
happening on our planet any given time.
00:32:37.279 --> 00:32:40.789
So to to try and comprehend um enough
00:32:40.799 --> 00:32:44.470
gravity to warp time to slow things down
00:32:44.480 --> 00:32:46.950
to the observer and and increase mass
00:32:46.960 --> 00:32:50.870
just it's really whack.
00:32:50.880 --> 00:32:52.950
Sad on the brain. That's true. And you
00:32:52.960 --> 00:32:55.110
know, but uh look, John's question there
00:32:55.120 --> 00:32:57.750
is is a great question because it's it's
00:32:57.760 --> 00:33:00.549
not intuitively obvious what is
00:33:00.559 --> 00:33:03.110
happening uh in a situation like
00:33:03.120 --> 00:33:04.470
something traveling close to the speed
00:33:04.480 --> 00:33:07.669
of light and and so he's right to ask
00:33:07.679 --> 00:33:09.909
would that mass actually turn it into a
00:33:09.919 --> 00:33:11.909
black hole? Uh but the answer is no
00:33:11.919 --> 00:33:12.950
because of the reasons that I've
00:33:12.960 --> 00:33:14.710
outlined. But it's great great thinking.
00:33:14.720 --> 00:33:16.230
>> It is indeed. Thank you, John. Thanks
00:33:16.240 --> 00:33:18.230
for the question. Do appreciate it. Keep
00:33:18.240 --> 00:33:19.669
your questions coming in. We're trying
00:33:19.679 --> 00:33:22.310
to um run them down, but they it's it's
00:33:22.320 --> 00:33:25.509
it's an ever growing mass really.
00:33:25.519 --> 00:33:27.509
>> It's all right. Look, as you said
00:33:27.519 --> 00:33:29.430
earlier, Andrew, um all the space
00:33:29.440 --> 00:33:30.870
nutters are going to get together and
00:33:30.880 --> 00:33:32.870
sort them out for themselves and we'll
00:33:32.880 --> 00:33:34.070
be
00:33:34.080 --> 00:33:35.909
>> encourage actually if uh if people want
00:33:35.919 --> 00:33:39.029
to ask questions of the group and and
00:33:39.039 --> 00:33:41.590
discuss it, they Yeah, by all means. Um
00:33:41.600 --> 00:33:43.350
that that's part of the reason we set up
00:33:43.360 --> 00:33:45.830
the Space Nuts podcast group. So, um,
00:33:45.840 --> 00:33:48.389
it's a good opportunity to not only meet
00:33:48.399 --> 00:33:50.630
like-minded people who enjoy these these
00:33:50.640 --> 00:33:52.389
topics, but also to maybe come up with
00:33:52.399 --> 00:33:54.870
your own ideas on on what might be. And,
00:33:54.880 --> 00:33:56.310
you know, I'll keep an eye on it, and if
00:33:56.320 --> 00:33:57.830
something pops in there that we think is
00:33:57.840 --> 00:34:00.310
worthy of further discussion, we will
00:34:00.320 --> 00:34:03.110
certainly investigate that. Uh, thanks
00:34:03.120 --> 00:34:05.590
to everyone who um who who sent in their
00:34:05.600 --> 00:34:08.470
questions uh and contributed and joined
00:34:08.480 --> 00:34:10.790
the Space Nuts podcast group and Patreon
00:34:10.800 --> 00:34:11.909
and everything else. We really
00:34:11.919 --> 00:34:14.149
appreciate it. Uh but most of all we
00:34:14.159 --> 00:34:16.470
appreciate you Fred. Thank you so much.
00:34:16.480 --> 00:34:18.550
>> It's a pleasure. Thank you for having me
00:34:18.560 --> 00:34:19.430
as always.
00:34:19.440 --> 00:34:21.510
>> And we will catch you next week.
00:34:21.520 --> 00:34:24.149
Professor Fred Watson, uh astronomer at
00:34:24.159 --> 00:34:26.149
large. And from me, Andrew Dunley, thank
00:34:26.159 --> 00:34:28.069
you again and we'll catch you next time
00:34:28.079 --> 00:34:30.869
on another edition of Space Nuts.
00:34:30.879 --> 00:34:31.909
>> Space Nuts.
00:34:31.919 --> 00:34:33.990
>> You've been listening to the Space Nuts
00:34:34.000 --> 00:34:36.230
podcast
00:34:36.240 --> 00:34:39.190
>> available at Apple Podcasts, Spotify,
00:34:39.200 --> 00:34:41.829
iHeart Radio, or your favorite podcast
00:34:41.839 --> 00:34:44.230
player. You can also stream on demand at
00:34:44.240 --> 00:34:47.190
byes.com. This has been another quality
00:34:47.200 --> 00:34:51.639
podcast production from byes.com.