Dec. 31, 2025

Europa’s Ocean Secrets, Gravitational Waves & Black Hole Mysteries | Space Nuts: Astronomy...

Europa’s Ocean Secrets, Gravitational Waves & Black Hole Mysteries | Space Nuts: Astronomy...
Europa’s Ocean Secrets, Gravitational Waves & Black Hole Mysteries | Space Nuts: Astronomy...
Space News Today
Europa’s Ocean Secrets, Gravitational Waves & Black Hole Mysteries | Space Nuts: Astronomy...

This episode of Space Nuts is brought to you with the support of Antigravity A1 . Experience the future of flight with the world’s first all-in-one 8K 360 drone . With intuitive controls and immersive goggles, the Antigravity A1 redefines what it means to fly. Check it out at AntigravityA1. (https://www.antigravity.tech/drone/antigravity-a1/buy?utm_term=spacenuts)


Archived Insights: Europa Clipper, Gravitational Waves, and Black Hole Mysteries

In this special episode of Space Nuts , hosts Andrew Dunkley and Professor Fred Watson take a fascinating journey through some of the most compelling questions and discoveries in astronomy. As they explore the Europa Clipper mission, the nature of gravitational waves, and the enigmatic world of black holes, listeners are treated to a rich tapestry of cosmic knowledge. This episode originally aired in 2019.

Episode Highlights:

- Europa Clipper Mission: Andrew and Fred discuss NASA's exciting approval for the Europa Clipper mission, aimed at exploring Jupiter's icy moon Europa. They delve into the spacecraft's objectives, including investigating the moon's potential subsurface ocean and the challenges posed by Jupiter's intense radiation.

- Gravitational Waves Explained: The hosts explore the recent detection of gravitational waves, speculating on their origins, including a possible black hole-neutron star merger. They discuss the significance of these findings and the ongoing efforts of astronomers to understand the universe's most violent events.

- Black Hole Chris: Listener questions about the nature of black holes spark a lively discussion on topics such as infinite density, event horizons, and the complexities of capturing images of these cosmic phenomena. Andrew and Fred clarify misconceptions and provide insightful explanations.

- Space Travel and Relativity: The episode wraps up with an intriguing listener question about the effects of traveling near the speed of light. Andrew and Fred clarify how relativistic mass works and dispel myths surrounding the transformation of spaceships into black holes.

For more Space Nuts, including our continuously updating newsfeed and to listen to all our episodes, visit our website. (https://www.spacenutspodcast.com/) Follow us on social media at SpaceNutsPod on Facebook, X, YouTube Music Music, Tumblr, Instagram, and TikTok. We love engaging with our community, so be sure to drop us a message or comment on your favorite platform.

If you’d like to help support Space Nuts and join our growing family of insiders for commercial-free episodes and more, visit spacenutspodcast.com/about (https://www.spacenutspodcast.com/about) .

Stay curious, keep looking up, and join us next time for more stellar insights and cosmic wonders. Until then, clear skies and happy stargazing.


Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/space-nuts-astronomy-insights-cosmic-discoveries--2631155/support (https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/space-nuts-astronomy-insights-cosmic-discoveries--2631155/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss) .

Episode link: https://play.headliner.app/episode/30915703?utm_source=youtube

WEBVTT
Kind: captions
Language: en

00:00:00.719 --> 00:00:02.790
Hi, Andrew Dunley here. Fred and I are


00:00:02.800 --> 00:00:04.390
taking a little bit of a break over the


00:00:04.400 --> 00:00:06.230
Christmas New Year period just to catch


00:00:06.240 --> 00:00:09.030
our breath. We'll be back uh sometime


00:00:09.040 --> 00:00:11.430
around mid January. In the meantime,


00:00:11.440 --> 00:00:13.350
we've been digging through the archives


00:00:13.360 --> 00:00:16.470
at some of the most perplexing and


00:00:16.480 --> 00:00:18.630
popular episodes that we've done in


00:00:18.640 --> 00:00:22.150
recent times. So, sit back and enjoy.


00:00:22.160 --> 00:00:27.029
>> 15 seconds. Guidance is internal. 10 9


00:00:27.039 --> 00:00:29.669
ignition sequence start. Space Nuts.


00:00:29.679 --> 00:00:32.229
>> 5 4 3 2


00:00:32.239 --> 00:00:34.549
>> 1 2 3 4 5 2 1


00:00:34.559 --> 00:00:35.750
>> Space Nuts.


00:00:35.760 --> 00:00:38.310
>> Astronauts report. It feels good.


00:00:38.320 --> 00:00:40.069
>> Hi there and thanks for joining us on


00:00:40.079 --> 00:00:42.549
the Space Nuts podcast. My name is


00:00:42.559 --> 00:00:44.790
Andrew Dunley, your host. And joining


00:00:44.800 --> 00:00:47.670
me, as always, Professor Fred Watson,


00:00:47.680 --> 00:00:49.830
astronomer at large from the department


00:00:49.840 --> 00:00:52.229
of da da da da da. It's a pretty long


00:00:52.239 --> 00:00:54.150
title. That's what we'll call it from


00:00:54.160 --> 00:00:56.150
now on. Good day, Fred. You could call


00:00:56.160 --> 00:00:58.869
me the AAL because AAL.


00:00:58.879 --> 00:01:00.709
>> Yeah. When I was when I was astronomer


00:01:00.719 --> 00:01:03.189
in charge, I was AIC.


00:01:03.199 --> 00:01:05.670
The only trouble is AAL actually has


00:01:05.680 --> 00:01:07.670
another significant meaning in


00:01:07.680 --> 00:01:09.510
Australian astronomy because it doesn't


00:01:09.520 --> 00:01:11.109
only stand for astronomer at large. It


00:01:11.119 --> 00:01:13.590
also stands for Astronomy Australia


00:01:13.600 --> 00:01:16.230
Limited. So, uh, just throw that idea


00:01:16.240 --> 00:01:17.749
out. That's a rubbish idea. It'll just


00:01:17.759 --> 00:01:18.789
be a Yeah,


00:01:18.799 --> 00:01:21.990
>> I was once given the title URS.


00:01:22.000 --> 00:01:25.830
But anyway, um,


00:01:25.840 --> 00:01:27.670
some people will understand that.


00:01:27.680 --> 00:01:29.030
>> Yeah. You've got lovely friends, haven't


00:01:29.040 --> 00:01:29.270
you?


00:01:29.280 --> 00:01:31.030
>> I've got a lot of good friends. Yes.


00:01:31.040 --> 00:01:31.830
>> Yeah. Yeah.


00:01:31.840 --> 00:01:33.749
>> Now, today we're going to talk about


00:01:33.759 --> 00:01:35.910
some very exciting things. It looks like


00:01:35.920 --> 00:01:37.910
black holes are still in people's minds.


00:01:37.920 --> 00:01:40.550
So, we're going to be talking about um a


00:01:40.560 --> 00:01:41.749
couple of questions that have come in


00:01:41.759 --> 00:01:44.950
from people about infinite density. Uh,


00:01:44.960 --> 00:01:46.630
density. I keep getting it mixed up with


00:01:46.640 --> 00:01:48.950
destiny. I don't know why. might have


00:01:48.960 --> 00:01:50.469
been a Back to the Future movie that


00:01:50.479 --> 00:01:52.710
confused me on that front. Uh, and


00:01:52.720 --> 00:01:55.030
issues photographing a black hole. Why


00:01:55.040 --> 00:01:57.350
were they issues at all? And another


00:01:57.360 --> 00:02:00.069
question about space travel and near


00:02:00.079 --> 00:02:03.030
light speed travel. Uh, we're also going


00:02:03.040 --> 00:02:07.030
to look at um the cause of a


00:02:07.040 --> 00:02:08.949
gravitational wave that was detected


00:02:08.959 --> 00:02:10.469
recently. This is exciting because they


00:02:10.479 --> 00:02:12.550
think they've pinpointed an actual


00:02:12.560 --> 00:02:14.070
cause.


00:02:14.080 --> 00:02:15.589
And we're going to start off today,


00:02:15.599 --> 00:02:17.589
Fred, by talking about this rather


00:02:17.599 --> 00:02:19.589
exciting mission that's one step closer


00:02:19.599 --> 00:02:22.630
to happening. A mission to Jupiter's ice


00:02:22.640 --> 00:02:25.350
moon Europa. And that's what we'll start


00:02:25.360 --> 00:02:27.270
with this uh well this afternoon, this


00:02:27.280 --> 00:02:28.869
morning, tonight, this evening,


00:02:28.879 --> 00:02:30.550
yesterday,


00:02:30.560 --> 00:02:31.350
whenever


00:02:31.360 --> 00:02:34.150
>> whenever it is. Yeah, it's Yeah. So


00:02:34.160 --> 00:02:36.790
look, a terrific story, very good news


00:02:36.800 --> 00:02:39.990
from uh NASA that they um the powers


00:02:40.000 --> 00:02:42.630
that be within NASA have uh given the


00:02:42.640 --> 00:02:46.229
go-ahad um for a mission called Europa


00:02:46.239 --> 00:02:48.790
Clipper, which is is one of the uh


00:02:48.800 --> 00:02:52.229
missions that's been uh postulated or or


00:02:52.239 --> 00:02:55.030
sorry proposed is a better word for um


00:02:55.040 --> 00:02:56.550
exploring the moons of the outer


00:02:56.560 --> 00:02:58.070
planets. There are a number that are


00:02:58.080 --> 00:02:59.990
kind of on the on the table at the


00:03:00.000 --> 00:03:01.750
moment. Some further advanced than


00:03:01.760 --> 00:03:04.550
others, but Europa Clipper is pretty


00:03:04.560 --> 00:03:07.430
well advanced and as you can tell it's


00:03:07.440 --> 00:03:09.350
target, its main target is Jupiter's


00:03:09.360 --> 00:03:12.309
moon Europa, which is one of these um


00:03:12.319 --> 00:03:16.390
ocean moons, uh ice ocean moons. Uh we


00:03:16.400 --> 00:03:18.869
believe it has a covering of ice, and we


00:03:18.879 --> 00:03:20.070
don't know whether it's thin ice or


00:03:20.080 --> 00:03:21.750
thick ice. So that will be one of the


00:03:21.760 --> 00:03:23.670
things that Europa Clipper would find


00:03:23.680 --> 00:03:26.949
out. um and an ocean underneath it and


00:03:26.959 --> 00:03:30.550
and a rocky core. Uh so Europa Clipper I


00:03:30.560 --> 00:03:33.110
think they are talking about having it


00:03:33.120 --> 00:03:37.750
ready for launch in 2023 which is um you


00:03:37.760 --> 00:03:40.470
know fantastic if if they can do that.


00:03:40.480 --> 00:03:43.110
That's right. Uh but apparently that's


00:03:43.120 --> 00:03:46.229
um that's the the the the baseline


00:03:46.239 --> 00:03:48.550
commitment as it's called supports a


00:03:48.560 --> 00:03:51.750
launch readiness date by 2025. Um, it's


00:03:51.760 --> 00:03:53.509
all being done at the Jet Propulsion


00:03:53.519 --> 00:03:56.070
Laboratory in Pasadena. That's where the


00:03:56.080 --> 00:03:58.390
spacecraft will be built. So, they've


00:03:58.400 --> 00:04:02.309
got the go-ahad. It's um it's got a you


00:04:02.319 --> 00:04:06.390
know, the next step in uh in approval


00:04:06.400 --> 00:04:09.110
from NASA, which I think is a pretty


00:04:09.120 --> 00:04:12.390
solid one. So, I think we you and I in


00:04:12.400 --> 00:04:13.990
2025


00:04:14.000 --> 00:04:16.069
will be talking a lot about Europa


00:04:16.079 --> 00:04:18.949
Clipper maybe. Yeah. and it and what


00:04:18.959 --> 00:04:20.949
will be the basis of the of the mission?


00:04:20.959 --> 00:04:22.710
Are they just going there to have a look


00:04:22.720 --> 00:04:23.670
because


00:04:23.680 --> 00:04:25.909
>> it is a bit like that but it's a very


00:04:25.919 --> 00:04:27.990
good look. Um so it's not going to land


00:04:28.000 --> 00:04:30.629
on Europa. It is a proposal to go into


00:04:30.639 --> 00:04:32.550
orbit around Europe actually to go into


00:04:32.560 --> 00:04:35.430
orbit around Jupiter. Uh and of course


00:04:35.440 --> 00:04:37.270
orbiting Jupiter is always hazardous


00:04:37.280 --> 00:04:40.310
because of the the intense um you know


00:04:40.320 --> 00:04:42.950
the intense uh radiation belts that


00:04:42.960 --> 00:04:45.110
Jupiter has. It's got a magnetic field


00:04:45.120 --> 00:04:47.110
thousands of times bigger than the


00:04:47.120 --> 00:04:48.550
earth's and has these high energy


00:04:48.560 --> 00:04:51.110
radiation belts around it that threaten


00:04:51.120 --> 00:04:54.710
to melt the inards of spacecraft. Uh so


00:04:54.720 --> 00:04:56.710
like uh the Juno mission which is


00:04:56.720 --> 00:04:59.350
currently in orbit around Jupiter, this


00:04:59.360 --> 00:05:02.870
uh Europa Clipper will go into a very uh


00:05:02.880 --> 00:05:08.469
elongated orbit um which will give it 45


00:05:08.479 --> 00:05:12.390
flybys of Europa. Uh, and the altitudes


00:05:12.400 --> 00:05:15.510
will vary from 2,700 kilometers to 25


00:05:15.520 --> 00:05:17.189
kilometers. So, it will really be


00:05:17.199 --> 00:05:18.550
skimming over the surface.


00:05:18.560 --> 00:05:19.189
>> Oh, will.


00:05:19.199 --> 00:05:21.430
>> And it's got this huge science package


00:05:21.440 --> 00:05:23.670
with all the kind of, you know, the


00:05:23.680 --> 00:05:25.830
goubbins that you would expect to find


00:05:25.840 --> 00:05:28.629
on board something like that, including


00:05:28.639 --> 00:05:30.870
a mass spectrometer,


00:05:30.880 --> 00:05:34.070
uh, which basically measures, you know,


00:05:34.080 --> 00:05:36.150
the the weights of atoms, as you might


00:05:36.160 --> 00:05:39.430
guess. Uh it um that is interesting


00:05:39.440 --> 00:05:42.310
because Europa like Saturn's moon


00:05:42.320 --> 00:05:44.390
Enceladus is thought to have although it


00:05:44.400 --> 00:05:45.830
hasn't really been properly confirmed


00:05:45.840 --> 00:05:49.510
but thought to have uh ice uh fountains


00:05:49.520 --> 00:05:52.310
coming out of it. Um which are water


00:05:52.320 --> 00:05:54.629
that's squirting up through its uh


00:05:54.639 --> 00:05:56.870
through its icy shell and instantly


00:05:56.880 --> 00:05:59.029
freezing. It's not frozen. But if you


00:05:59.039 --> 00:06:01.029
fly through it as Cassini did with


00:06:01.039 --> 00:06:03.749
Enceladus, then you can sample what the


00:06:03.759 --> 00:06:06.150
atomic makeup is. And so the mass


00:06:06.160 --> 00:06:09.350
spectrometer will help with that. Uh and


00:06:09.360 --> 00:06:12.790
also um it's got this ground penetrating


00:06:12.800 --> 00:06:16.309
radar and that's going to be crucial in


00:06:16.319 --> 00:06:19.830
characterizing Europa's crust um and


00:06:19.840 --> 00:06:22.309
revealing how much of you know the


00:06:22.319 --> 00:06:25.430
potential water within is oceanic as as


00:06:25.440 --> 00:06:27.749
is expected or whether it is just


00:06:27.759 --> 00:06:29.749
pockets of water as we find in


00:06:29.759 --> 00:06:31.670
Antarctica and indeed around the south


00:06:31.680 --> 00:06:33.590
pole of Mars. Will they be able to tell


00:06:33.600 --> 00:06:36.070
what kind of water it is?


00:06:36.080 --> 00:06:40.870
>> Um uh to to some extent they will. Um it


00:06:40.880 --> 00:06:44.550
it may require a bit of um you know


00:06:44.560 --> 00:06:46.629
inference from other measurements. But


00:06:46.639 --> 00:06:49.909
if you've got samples of ice crystals,


00:06:49.919 --> 00:06:52.870
uh then you can do exactly that. you can


00:06:52.880 --> 00:06:56.469
you know you can uh basically tell tell


00:06:56.479 --> 00:06:59.350
whether it's saline water or fresh water


00:06:59.360 --> 00:07:01.189
because you can see the you can measure


00:07:01.199 --> 00:07:04.550
the salt content of it. So like um


00:07:04.560 --> 00:07:07.510
Saturn's moon and Celadus uh which is


00:07:07.520 --> 00:07:09.510
actually quite rich in minerals and and


00:07:09.520 --> 00:07:11.430
it's the silicut in that that tells you


00:07:11.440 --> 00:07:13.589
that this water was once in contact with


00:07:13.599 --> 00:07:17.110
with rock. Uh, I think the Europa


00:07:17.120 --> 00:07:18.950
Clipper will be able to sample exactly


00:07:18.960 --> 00:07:21.189
those things too, assuming these plumes


00:07:21.199 --> 00:07:23.430
are real because they're then they're


00:07:23.440 --> 00:07:25.029
not well observed. There are there is


00:07:25.039 --> 00:07:27.029
evidence. I've seen images that that


00:07:27.039 --> 00:07:29.189
seem to show these plumes coming from


00:07:29.199 --> 00:07:31.909
Europa. Uh, assuming they're real, when


00:07:31.919 --> 00:07:33.909
they fly through, um, hopefully we will


00:07:33.919 --> 00:07:35.430
be able to tell what kind of water it is


00:07:35.440 --> 00:07:36.070
exactly.


00:07:36.080 --> 00:07:38.710
>> And will they be able to tell how much


00:07:38.720 --> 00:07:40.950
water there is underneath the surface?


00:07:40.960 --> 00:07:43.749
Yes, they will because that will very


00:07:43.759 --> 00:07:46.309
much be revealed by the um the ground


00:07:46.319 --> 00:07:49.029
penetrating radar in exactly the way


00:07:49.039 --> 00:07:51.670
that um one of the spacecraft in orbit


00:07:51.680 --> 00:07:53.350
around Mars. I think it was the I think


00:07:53.360 --> 00:07:54.629
it was might even have been Mars


00:07:54.639 --> 00:07:56.550
Reconnaissance Orbiter, I'm not sure,


00:07:56.560 --> 00:07:59.670
detected this lake of liquid water


00:07:59.680 --> 00:08:01.589
underneath the ice cap of the southern


00:08:01.599 --> 00:08:03.909
ice cap of Mars about a year ago. You


00:08:03.919 --> 00:08:06.869
and I spoke about it. Um, and they can


00:08:06.879 --> 00:08:08.469
tell exactly how much there is there


00:08:08.479 --> 00:08:10.629
because you you can see the boundary


00:08:10.639 --> 00:08:12.390
with this sort of radar. You can see the


00:08:12.400 --> 00:08:14.070
boundary between an ice surface and a


00:08:14.080 --> 00:08:16.150
water surface. And that's crucial to


00:08:16.160 --> 00:08:18.629
doing this. So, this mission won't


00:08:18.639 --> 00:08:21.510
actually be looking for life, but it


00:08:21.520 --> 00:08:25.430
will be looking for uh the potential for


00:08:25.440 --> 00:08:28.629
life to perhaps exist on a on a moon


00:08:28.639 --> 00:08:30.230
like this.


00:08:30.240 --> 00:08:33.670
>> Exactly. So, as the as the blurb um on


00:08:33.680 --> 00:08:36.709
the NASA website says, uh it will help


00:08:36.719 --> 00:08:38.389
scientists investigate the chemical


00:08:38.399 --> 00:08:40.790
makeup of Europa's potentially habitable


00:08:40.800 --> 00:08:43.350
environment while minimizing the need to


00:08:43.360 --> 00:08:45.509
drill through layers of ice. So, that


00:08:45.519 --> 00:08:46.949
what they're going to try and do is as


00:08:46.959 --> 00:08:49.350
much as they can from orbit.


00:08:49.360 --> 00:08:52.470
Um and then you know if there's like if


00:08:52.480 --> 00:08:54.870
they find lipids and amino acids and all


00:08:54.880 --> 00:08:56.870
this sort of thing in the uh in the


00:08:56.880 --> 00:08:59.269
plumes of ice coming coming from Europa


00:08:59.279 --> 00:09:01.350
then clearly the next step will be a


00:09:01.360 --> 00:09:03.750
lander that starts digging holes in the


00:09:03.760 --> 00:09:04.070
ice.


00:09:04.080 --> 00:09:04.630
>> Yes.


00:09:04.640 --> 00:09:06.870
>> I mean you know before you do that the


00:09:06.880 --> 00:09:07.990
first thing you need to know is how


00:09:08.000 --> 00:09:09.030
thick the ice is.


00:09:09.040 --> 00:09:09.990
>> Yes.


00:09:10.000 --> 00:09:14.470
>> If it's a couple of miles thick


00:09:14.480 --> 00:09:15.990
>> actually a couple of miles is better


00:09:16.000 --> 00:09:17.190
than what they're expecting.


00:09:17.200 --> 00:09:20.550
>> Oh is that right? more like 25 or 30


00:09:20.560 --> 00:09:23.030
>> miles or kilometers. That's right.


00:09:23.040 --> 00:09:26.710
Choose your units. Um yes. So yes, a a


00:09:26.720 --> 00:09:29.829
thinish layer of ice would be pretty


00:09:29.839 --> 00:09:32.389
pretty um good to you know to cope with.


00:09:32.399 --> 00:09:34.150
You could probably do that. I mean by


00:09:34.160 --> 00:09:35.590
thin I mean less than a kilometer


00:09:35.600 --> 00:09:36.550
probably.


00:09:36.560 --> 00:09:39.110
>> Yes. But the likelihood is it's it's


00:09:39.120 --> 00:09:40.870
probably more. But I guess we'll we'll


00:09:40.880 --> 00:09:42.470
have to wait and see.


00:09:42.480 --> 00:09:44.389
>> The thing is and um Europa is covered in


00:09:44.399 --> 00:09:45.910
all these cracks that are that are


00:09:45.920 --> 00:09:47.590
brownish in color. Yes,


00:09:47.600 --> 00:09:49.509
>> that's thought to be the effect of


00:09:49.519 --> 00:09:52.150
sunlight on brine on basically on salt


00:09:52.160 --> 00:09:54.070
water. So, you've already got a hint


00:09:54.080 --> 00:09:57.030
there that it's probably a salty ocean


00:09:57.040 --> 00:09:58.389
underneath the surface.


00:09:58.399 --> 00:10:00.150
>> Well, salt's probably not that uncommon


00:10:00.160 --> 00:10:02.310
in the universe really. Um,


00:10:02.320 --> 00:10:03.350
>> that's right. It's not.


00:10:03.360 --> 00:10:05.910
>> It's one of one of the base materials,


00:10:05.920 --> 00:10:08.389
isn't it? Uh, of course, this doesn't


00:10:08.399 --> 00:10:09.990
guarantee they're actually going to go.


00:10:10.000 --> 00:10:12.230
This is just another step forward in the


00:10:12.240 --> 00:10:14.069
approval process. It it does. It does.


00:10:14.079 --> 00:10:16.230
Correct. very longitudinal process and


00:10:16.240 --> 00:10:18.389
they have to get over a lot of hurdles


00:10:18.399 --> 00:10:19.750
before they actually hit the launch


00:10:19.760 --> 00:10:22.550
button. So, uh hopefully they're um


00:10:22.560 --> 00:10:24.630
they're going to get there and u it's


00:10:24.640 --> 00:10:26.310
it's a long trip to


00:10:26.320 --> 00:10:27.590
>> Yes, it is. That's the other thing.


00:10:27.600 --> 00:10:29.030
>> So, they got to time it right. They've


00:10:29.040 --> 00:10:30.310
got to get in the right place at the


00:10:30.320 --> 00:10:31.030
right time.


00:10:31.040 --> 00:10:33.509
>> Exactly. All of the above. That's right.


00:10:33.519 --> 00:10:36.069
So, at least what it you know, at least


00:10:36.079 --> 00:10:37.829
uh it's not a knock back. That's the


00:10:37.839 --> 00:10:38.630
good news.


00:10:38.640 --> 00:10:40.470
>> Yes, indeed. All right. Well, we'll keep


00:10:40.480 --> 00:10:42.069
an eye on this story because I'm sure


00:10:42.079 --> 00:10:43.990
there'll be more to report in the not


00:10:44.000 --> 00:10:46.630
too distant future about a mission to


00:10:46.640 --> 00:10:49.590
Europa. You're listening to Space Nuts


00:10:49.600 --> 00:10:53.430
with Andrew Dunley and Fred Watson.


00:10:53.440 --> 00:10:54.949
Let's take a break from the show to tell


00:10:54.959 --> 00:10:58.630
you about our sponsor, Anti-gravity A1.


00:10:58.640 --> 00:11:00.550
Have you ever wished you could actually


00:11:00.560 --> 00:11:03.030
feel what it's like to fly? Not just


00:11:03.040 --> 00:11:04.710
control a drone from the ground, but


00:11:04.720 --> 00:11:07.509
truly experience the air around you.


00:11:07.519 --> 00:11:10.230
Well, that future has just arrived.


00:11:10.240 --> 00:11:13.030
Introducing the Anti-gravity A1, the


00:11:13.040 --> 00:11:16.949
world's first all-in-one 8K 360 drone,


00:11:16.959 --> 00:11:20.150
and it's officially available now. Uh,


00:11:20.160 --> 00:11:21.910
this isn't just another drone. It's an


00:11:21.920 --> 00:11:24.550
entirely new category. With Anti-Gravity


00:11:24.560 --> 00:11:27.110
A1, you don't fly by fiddling with


00:11:27.120 --> 00:11:29.430
sticks. You fly with your hands and your


00:11:29.440 --> 00:11:32.550
head. The vision goggles use ultrasharp


00:11:32.560 --> 00:11:35.829
dual micro OLED displays and the grip


00:11:35.839 --> 00:11:38.870
controllers free motion uh lets you


00:11:38.880 --> 00:11:41.110
literally point where you want to go.


00:11:41.120 --> 00:11:43.430
Look left, the drone looks left. Tilt


00:11:43.440 --> 00:11:46.230
your hand, it responds instantly. It's


00:11:46.240 --> 00:11:48.230
the most intuitive flight system ever


00:11:48.240 --> 00:11:51.350
created. Easy for beginners, but still


00:11:51.360 --> 00:11:54.150
offering full FPV uh controls for


00:11:54.160 --> 00:11:56.310
seasoned pilots.


00:11:56.320 --> 00:11:59.269
And the whole drone weighs in at just


00:11:59.279 --> 00:12:03.190
249 g. That means travel ready,


00:12:03.200 --> 00:12:05.509
regulation friendly, and it fits in the


00:12:05.519 --> 00:12:08.629
palm of your hand. Plus, anti-gravity A1


00:12:08.639 --> 00:12:11.670
is packed with smart tools. Sky Path,


00:12:11.680 --> 00:12:13.750
which lets you design and automate


00:12:13.760 --> 00:12:16.710
flight routes. Sky Genie, which performs


00:12:16.720 --> 00:12:19.590
complex flight moves with one tap, and


00:12:19.600 --> 00:12:21.829
Deep Track, which locks onto subjects


00:12:21.839 --> 00:12:24.310
with amazing precision. The Anti-Gravity


00:12:24.320 --> 00:12:26.710
A1 is now available in three bundles at


00:12:26.720 --> 00:12:29.110
the anti-gravity store, Best Buy, and


00:12:29.120 --> 00:12:31.829
authorized retailers worldwide. So, if


00:12:31.839 --> 00:12:33.990
you ever wanted to rethink what a drone


00:12:34.000 --> 00:12:37.190
can be, check out the anti-gravity A1.


00:12:37.200 --> 00:12:40.389
Just visit anti-gravity.te.


00:12:40.399 --> 00:12:42.870
That's anti-gravity.te.


00:12:42.880 --> 00:12:45.030
Or you can tap on the link in the show


00:12:45.040 --> 00:12:46.389
notes.


00:12:46.399 --> 00:12:48.310
>> Roger, you're here also.


00:12:48.320 --> 00:12:50.470
>> Space nuts. Now, Fred, we've uh


00:12:50.480 --> 00:12:52.069
discussed


00:12:52.079 --> 00:12:55.269
uh gravitational waves before and a few


00:12:55.279 --> 00:12:57.190
of those have been detected in recent


00:12:57.200 --> 00:13:01.030
times. Uh the problem with them is what


00:13:01.040 --> 00:13:04.870
is the cause? And now in a recently


00:13:04.880 --> 00:13:07.030
detected gravitational wave, they think


00:13:07.040 --> 00:13:10.230
they've got a candidate. That's that's


00:13:10.240 --> 00:13:11.750
right. This is so this is, you know,


00:13:11.760 --> 00:13:15.030
it's a an ongoing story. Uh what I like


00:13:15.040 --> 00:13:16.629
about this story is it's got a nice


00:13:16.639 --> 00:13:19.030
Australian component because there is um


00:13:19.040 --> 00:13:22.550
there's a a a basically a a


00:13:22.560 --> 00:13:24.230
collaboration here in Australia which is


00:13:24.240 --> 00:13:26.710
called Osgrav uh which is about


00:13:26.720 --> 00:13:28.470
gravitational waves. It's a you know


00:13:28.480 --> 00:13:30.629
kind of fairly predictable name but um


00:13:30.639 --> 00:13:32.389
it includes people from the Australian


00:13:32.399 --> 00:13:34.870
univers national university and I think


00:13:34.880 --> 00:13:36.710
University of Western Australia other


00:13:36.720 --> 00:13:38.629
places which are strong in gravitational


00:13:38.639 --> 00:13:41.829
wave astronomy. So um it's very nice


00:13:41.839 --> 00:13:43.829
that it has this Australian component.


00:13:43.839 --> 00:13:47.030
So what's the story? Well uh the large


00:13:47.040 --> 00:13:49.110
uh sorry the laser interferometer


00:13:49.120 --> 00:13:51.829
gravitational wave observatory otherwise


00:13:51.839 --> 00:13:55.110
known as LIGO um has been operating


00:13:55.120 --> 00:13:59.430
since uh 2015 in its uh sort of current


00:13:59.440 --> 00:14:01.110
state. It's actually technically called


00:14:01.120 --> 00:14:03.750
advanced LIGO because I think it took 15


00:14:03.760 --> 00:14:05.670
years of de of development to get to


00:14:05.680 --> 00:14:08.949
this stage. But that but they have uh


00:14:08.959 --> 00:14:11.990
now not quite regularly but at fairly


00:14:12.000 --> 00:14:14.710
infrequent intervals sorry fairly


00:14:14.720 --> 00:14:17.110
moderately moderate intervals let me put


00:14:17.120 --> 00:14:18.790
it that way they've been detecting


00:14:18.800 --> 00:14:21.269
gravitational wave events and for the


00:14:21.279 --> 00:14:22.790
last couple of years they've had an


00:14:22.800 --> 00:14:24.310
additional string to their bow. Remember


00:14:24.320 --> 00:14:25.750
there are two of these detectors at


00:14:25.760 --> 00:14:29.430
opposite corners of the United States um


00:14:29.440 --> 00:14:33.030
which um you need because uh otherwise


00:14:33.040 --> 00:14:34.550
you've got no idea where these things


00:14:34.560 --> 00:14:36.310
come from or even if they're real. you


00:14:36.320 --> 00:14:38.629
need to see the gravitational wave pass


00:14:38.639 --> 00:14:40.310
one and then the other with the right


00:14:40.320 --> 00:14:42.949
kind of time interval in between. Um but


00:14:42.959 --> 00:14:44.550
they've been joined in the last few


00:14:44.560 --> 00:14:47.509
years by something called uh uh Virgo


00:14:47.519 --> 00:14:49.189
which uh in fact I think it's called


00:14:49.199 --> 00:14:51.509
advanced Virgo like advanced LIGO. Virgo


00:14:51.519 --> 00:14:53.750
is an Italian gravitational wave


00:14:53.760 --> 00:14:55.350
detector. And of course having three


00:14:55.360 --> 00:14:58.150
detectors widely spread over the surface


00:14:58.160 --> 00:14:59.670
of the earth means you can pinpoint


00:14:59.680 --> 00:15:01.750
things much more accurately in in terms


00:15:01.760 --> 00:15:03.110
of the direction in which these


00:15:03.120 --> 00:15:05.269
gravitational waves come in from. tri


00:15:05.279 --> 00:15:07.189
triangulating the signal.


00:15:07.199 --> 00:15:10.470
>> Exactly. That's exactly what it is. Um,


00:15:10.480 --> 00:15:12.470
what's interesting about this one though


00:15:12.480 --> 00:15:16.870
is that the signal seems to be from a


00:15:16.880 --> 00:15:21.430
black hole absorbing a neutron star.


00:15:21.440 --> 00:15:24.310
>> Um, we actually had a false alarm on


00:15:24.320 --> 00:15:27.030
this, which is embarrassing because um,


00:15:27.040 --> 00:15:28.870
my book has just gone to the printer


00:15:28.880 --> 00:15:30.870
saying, "Yes, we've observed a neutron


00:15:30.880 --> 00:15:33.189
star being absorbed by a black hole."


00:15:33.199 --> 00:15:36.069
Um, and that that I think disappeared


00:15:36.079 --> 00:15:38.310
because it turned out to be um


00:15:38.320 --> 00:15:40.389
terrestrial noise. It was sort of, you


00:15:40.399 --> 00:15:41.750
know, so I don't know whether it was a


00:15:41.760 --> 00:15:44.069
train going underneath


00:15:44.079 --> 00:15:44.470
probably


00:15:44.480 --> 00:15:46.230
>> or Yeah, something like that. That's the


00:15:46.240 --> 00:15:48.470
usual story, isn't it? A microwave oven.


00:15:48.480 --> 00:15:51.110
Um that was earlier this year. And and


00:15:51.120 --> 00:15:54.069
that um has now gone away, but it looks


00:15:54.079 --> 00:15:57.350
as though this one might actually be the


00:15:57.360 --> 00:15:59.430
real thing, a black hole and a neutron


00:15:59.440 --> 00:16:01.670
star. Uh we've had two black holes


00:16:01.680 --> 00:16:04.870
merging. Uh that's that's probably been


00:16:04.880 --> 00:16:07.030
the commonest source of gravitational


00:16:07.040 --> 00:16:08.710
waves. There've been several of those.


00:16:08.720 --> 00:16:10.389
We've had a couple of neutron stars


00:16:10.399 --> 00:16:12.790
merging as well. And that actually comes


00:16:12.800 --> 00:16:15.189
with celestial fireworks that you can


00:16:15.199 --> 00:16:18.069
observe with other types of telescope


00:16:18.079 --> 00:16:20.150
like neutrino telescopes, visible light


00:16:20.160 --> 00:16:22.230
telescopes, radio telescopes, x-ray


00:16:22.240 --> 00:16:25.110
telescopes, all of the above. Um and


00:16:25.120 --> 00:16:27.509
that was a big story actually late last


00:16:27.519 --> 00:16:30.629
year if I remember rightly. But um until


00:16:30.639 --> 00:16:34.629
now we haven't had a confirmed um uh


00:16:34.639 --> 00:16:36.790
observation of a neutron star being


00:16:36.800 --> 00:16:38.310
absorbed by a black hole and we still


00:16:38.320 --> 00:16:41.509
don't have it's still a bit speculative


00:16:41.519 --> 00:16:44.069
but from the masses that are inferred by


00:16:44.079 --> 00:16:45.749
the signal and remember what you get is


00:16:45.759 --> 00:16:49.670
this weird gravitational chirp uh it's


00:16:49.680 --> 00:16:53.110
the frequency of a sound wave going


00:16:53.120 --> 00:16:55.749
as the two things come together. Um, and


00:16:55.759 --> 00:16:57.590
it's that that gives you all the details


00:16:57.600 --> 00:16:59.829
of what it is that that are colliding.


00:16:59.839 --> 00:17:02.389
The suspicion is it's two objects, one


00:17:02.399 --> 00:17:05.510
of which is three solar masses and the


00:17:05.520 --> 00:17:09.350
other is five solar masses. I think I'm


00:17:09.360 --> 00:17:11.669
right in saying that. I uh should check


00:17:11.679 --> 00:17:14.870
those numbers. But anyway, uh that is


00:17:14.880 --> 00:17:17.590
the current uh expectation of what is


00:17:17.600 --> 00:17:20.150
colliding. So something three solar


00:17:20.160 --> 00:17:23.270
masses would have to be a neutron star


00:17:23.280 --> 00:17:26.870
because it's too lightweight uh to be a


00:17:26.880 --> 00:17:29.990
black hole. And so that is what's making


00:17:30.000 --> 00:17:33.830
this interesting. What's what's perhaps


00:17:33.840 --> 00:17:36.310
um a bit surprising


00:17:36.320 --> 00:17:39.909
uh it's is that you might expect there


00:17:39.919 --> 00:17:42.310
to be once again uh radiation coming


00:17:42.320 --> 00:17:43.669
from this of you know not just


00:17:43.679 --> 00:17:46.870
gravitational radiation but uh noise in


00:17:46.880 --> 00:17:50.310
the x-ray spectrum or neutron neutrinos


00:17:50.320 --> 00:17:52.870
uh particles things of that sort but it


00:17:52.880 --> 00:17:57.669
but it hasn't been observed and um the


00:17:57.679 --> 00:18:00.870
one of the Australian astronomers uh Um


00:18:00.880 --> 00:18:02.150
I've forgotten her first name. That's


00:18:02.160 --> 00:18:04.310
embarrassing, isn't it? Susan Susan


00:18:04.320 --> 00:18:07.669
Scott. Uh she's at um ANU, Australian


00:18:07.679 --> 00:18:12.470
National University. Uh she says that uh


00:18:12.480 --> 00:18:14.549
I if she well what she says is we've


00:18:14.559 --> 00:18:15.990
looked for light signatures of the


00:18:16.000 --> 00:18:17.590
event, but no one has found any up to


00:18:17.600 --> 00:18:19.909
this point. That indicates that if it is


00:18:19.919 --> 00:18:22.310
a black hole and a neutron star, then


00:18:22.320 --> 00:18:24.710
very likely the neutron star has been


00:18:24.720 --> 00:18:27.830
swallowed whole by the black hole. Uh uh


00:18:27.840 --> 00:18:29.990
he said and she says this could happen


00:18:30.000 --> 00:18:32.870
if the objects were of different masses.


00:18:32.880 --> 00:18:35.350
So it's the smaller object gets sucked


00:18:35.360 --> 00:18:37.029
in more quickly and and is swallowed


00:18:37.039 --> 00:18:39.029
whole. So you know it's not strung out


00:18:39.039 --> 00:18:43.190
into into this um mess of material uh


00:18:43.200 --> 00:18:46.710
that does emit um signals in the


00:18:46.720 --> 00:18:49.909
electromagnetic uh wave bands. Uh if it


00:18:49.919 --> 00:18:52.230
gets sucked in hole maybe you don't get


00:18:52.240 --> 00:18:53.909
any signal at all except for the


00:18:53.919 --> 00:18:55.350
gravitational wave signal.


00:18:55.360 --> 00:18:55.750
extraordinary.


00:18:55.760 --> 00:18:59.190
>> How how sudden would the impact be? I


00:18:59.200 --> 00:19:01.669
mean, you know, neutron stars, we've


00:19:01.679 --> 00:19:03.830
talked about them, and they're pretty


00:19:03.840 --> 00:19:06.549
volatile individuals and and quite


00:19:06.559 --> 00:19:08.630
dense. Um,


00:19:08.640 --> 00:19:10.870
>> quite quite dense is just a slight


00:19:10.880 --> 00:19:12.870
understatement there.


00:19:12.880 --> 00:19:16.310
>> Yes, indeed. Um, so, so


00:19:16.320 --> 00:19:18.549
I imagine it would be quite a cathlymic


00:19:18.559 --> 00:19:19.350
collision.


00:19:19.360 --> 00:19:22.390
>> Yeah, that's right. Um in fact so when


00:19:22.400 --> 00:19:25.110
you've got two black holes um what you


00:19:25.120 --> 00:19:26.789
get at the end of it is a more massive


00:19:26.799 --> 00:19:28.150
black hole


00:19:28.160 --> 00:19:30.950
>> uh and um you're talking there though


00:19:30.960 --> 00:19:32.710
about


00:19:32.720 --> 00:19:34.549
you know infinitely small infinite


00:19:34.559 --> 00:19:37.350
decimally small points merging uh their


00:19:37.360 --> 00:19:39.830
event horizon there are two event


00:19:39.840 --> 00:19:41.830
horizons merge as well and you get


00:19:41.840 --> 00:19:43.190
something called a ring down where the


00:19:43.200 --> 00:19:45.990
event horizon itself vibrates


00:19:46.000 --> 00:19:48.470
um I think with a neutron star you


00:19:48.480 --> 00:19:50.230
wouldn't have the event horizon


00:19:50.240 --> 00:19:52.070
But it will be possible for the the


00:19:52.080 --> 00:19:54.070
neutron star just basically to disappear


00:19:54.080 --> 00:19:55.830
over the black holes event horizon. You


00:19:55.840 --> 00:19:58.150
don't see anything. But neutron stars


00:19:58.160 --> 00:19:59.430
themselves as you and I have talked


00:19:59.440 --> 00:20:01.270
about many times are active in the sense


00:20:01.280 --> 00:20:03.430
that they've got highly intense magnetic


00:20:03.440 --> 00:20:05.990
fields on their surfaces and they beam


00:20:06.000 --> 00:20:08.390
this radiation out which we see as as


00:20:08.400 --> 00:20:10.549
pulsars. So they're not they're not


00:20:10.559 --> 00:20:12.950
particularly quiet things. I mean, this


00:20:12.960 --> 00:20:15.750
thing could be a pulsar whose lighthouse


00:20:15.760 --> 00:20:18.310
beam of radiation is missing the Earth,


00:20:18.320 --> 00:20:20.390
if if I can put it that way, because the


00:20:20.400 --> 00:20:22.230
only reason we see pulsars is when


00:20:22.240 --> 00:20:25.510
you've got a neutron star whose uh beams


00:20:25.520 --> 00:20:27.510
of radiation from their poles actually


00:20:27.520 --> 00:20:29.190
sweeps across the Earth. And that, of


00:20:29.200 --> 00:20:31.750
course, is a particular uh circumstance.


00:20:31.760 --> 00:20:34.630
Maybe this one wasn't like that and it's


00:20:34.640 --> 00:20:37.350
just got chewed up uh and we haven't kn


00:20:37.360 --> 00:20:39.909
we haven't seen it its demise other than


00:20:39.919 --> 00:20:41.830
in the gravitational waves. I think


00:20:41.840 --> 00:20:43.750
there'll be more about this story Andrew


00:20:43.760 --> 00:20:46.070
and um I hope you and I can bring it to


00:20:46.080 --> 00:20:48.950
our uh our space nuts listener or


00:20:48.960 --> 00:20:50.070
listeners


00:20:50.080 --> 00:20:52.549
>> our fraternity.


00:20:52.559 --> 00:20:55.909
>> Yes. Uh well it's it um you know the the


00:20:55.919 --> 00:20:58.710
more we can gather in terms of data uh


00:20:58.720 --> 00:21:01.350
on gravitational waves the the more we


00:21:01.360 --> 00:21:04.549
will learn and who knows what sort of


00:21:04.559 --> 00:21:06.149
problems it could solve down the track.


00:21:06.159 --> 00:21:07.110
So


00:21:07.120 --> 00:21:09.430
>> exactly it's always my comment that you


00:21:09.440 --> 00:21:11.270
never know what you're what you've


00:21:11.280 --> 00:21:13.029
setting in store for the future from all


00:21:13.039 --> 00:21:13.990
this knowledge.


00:21:14.000 --> 00:21:16.230
>> Exactly. Yeah. I mean you just gather


00:21:16.240 --> 00:21:18.470
the knowledge one day it might just go


00:21:18.480 --> 00:21:19.990
you know a penny will drop with someone


00:21:20.000 --> 00:21:21.190
else maybe


00:21:21.200 --> 00:21:23.110
>> a generation down the track. Who knows?


00:21:23.120 --> 00:21:24.870
It's it's all useful.


00:21:24.880 --> 00:21:26.549
>> And even if it's not, it's good to be


00:21:26.559 --> 00:21:28.149
able to gather it and


00:21:28.159 --> 00:21:30.870
>> well, they use it some some way.


00:21:30.880 --> 00:21:32.950
>> It it's um you know, all these things


00:21:32.960 --> 00:21:34.950
are constantly testing Einstein's theory


00:21:34.960 --> 00:21:38.470
of relativity. And that's um very


00:21:38.480 --> 00:21:39.750
important because we know there's


00:21:39.760 --> 00:21:40.870
something wrong with it, but we haven't


00:21:40.880 --> 00:21:42.710
found anything wrong with it yet. Even


00:21:42.720 --> 00:21:44.390
though it's been tested within an inch


00:21:44.400 --> 00:21:47.110
of its life, it still holds up.


00:21:47.120 --> 00:21:49.510
>> Yeah. Fascinating. All right. Stop.


00:21:49.520 --> 00:21:51.110
>> You're listening to the Space Nuts


00:21:51.120 --> 00:21:53.430
podcast with Andrew Dunley and Fred


00:21:53.440 --> 00:21:56.549
Watson.


00:21:56.559 --> 00:21:58.710
>> Okay, we checked all four systems and


00:21:58.720 --> 00:21:59.510
being with the girls.


00:21:59.520 --> 00:22:00.390
>> Space Nuts.


00:22:00.400 --> 00:22:02.310
>> Now, Fred, I do want to shout out once


00:22:02.320 --> 00:22:06.310
again to our patrons. Uh, the number 39


00:22:06.320 --> 00:22:08.710
now. Uh, thank you so much for


00:22:08.720 --> 00:22:11.110
supporting the Space Nuts podcast. We so


00:22:11.120 --> 00:22:13.029
appreciate it. And if you're interested


00:22:13.039 --> 00:22:15.350
in becoming a patron, you can do so at


00:22:15.360 --> 00:22:17.909
patreon.com/spacenuts.


00:22:17.919 --> 00:22:21.669
That's patreon.com/spacenuts.


00:22:21.679 --> 00:22:24.310
And uh thank you to everybody who has


00:22:24.320 --> 00:22:27.270
joined the Spacenuts podcast group. They


00:22:27.280 --> 00:22:29.669
number in their hundreds now, Fred.


00:22:29.679 --> 00:22:31.669
>> We've only had the page going for a bit


00:22:31.679 --> 00:22:33.909
over a week and already we've we've


00:22:33.919 --> 00:22:35.669
tracked the century.


00:22:35.679 --> 00:22:38.630
>> And have over 100 people that are all


00:22:38.640 --> 00:22:40.870
Space Nuts fans who are all now talking


00:22:40.880 --> 00:22:42.789
to each other and uh answering each


00:22:42.799 --> 00:22:45.270
other's questions and uh having a fair


00:22:45.280 --> 00:22:47.430
bit of fun. So, it's I'm so pleased we


00:22:47.440 --> 00:22:49.830
were able to put um those people


00:22:49.840 --> 00:22:51.590
together and uh who knows friends


00:22:51.600 --> 00:22:54.230
friendships may be forged


00:22:54.240 --> 00:22:56.630
>> um or collaborations that might solve


00:22:56.640 --> 00:22:58.070
some of the mysteries of the universe.


00:22:58.080 --> 00:23:00.390
Who knows? Uh that would be a lovely


00:23:00.400 --> 00:23:03.110
legacy. I think uh let's um


00:23:03.120 --> 00:23:05.669
>> and of course if you would like to be a


00:23:05.679 --> 00:23:07.669
uh a member of the Space Nuts podcast


00:23:07.679 --> 00:23:10.630
group um just find it. It's on Facebook


00:23:10.640 --> 00:23:12.310
uh Space Nuts podcast group in your


00:23:12.320 --> 00:23:14.789
search engine. And um yes, just ask to


00:23:14.799 --> 00:23:17.110
join and we will click the approve


00:23:17.120 --> 00:23:19.110
button. Everybody seems to be


00:23:19.120 --> 00:23:21.029
like-minded and enjoying themselves. So


00:23:21.039 --> 00:23:23.430
uh that's what it's all about.


00:23:23.440 --> 00:23:27.110
Now Fred, some questions, if you will.


00:23:27.120 --> 00:23:29.750
Um hello again, fellow nutters. I have a


00:23:29.760 --> 00:23:32.310
question. I'm hoping you can help me um


00:23:32.320 --> 00:23:35.110
understanding an old chestnut. Black


00:23:35.120 --> 00:23:37.669
holes. If a black hole is an infinite


00:23:37.679 --> 00:23:39.510
dense point, why does it have a


00:23:39.520 --> 00:23:41.350
diameter? I don't understand why


00:23:41.360 --> 00:23:43.190
astronomers refer to black holes by


00:23:43.200 --> 00:23:45.190
their size in terms of diameter when


00:23:45.200 --> 00:23:47.350
it's meant to be a point of infinite des


00:23:47.360 --> 00:23:49.669
uh density. Are they mistakenly


00:23:49.679 --> 00:23:52.390
referring to the event horizon? Mario


00:23:52.400 --> 00:23:54.470
from Melbourne. Hello Mario. Thanks for


00:23:54.480 --> 00:23:57.110
the question. And the answer is yes.


00:23:57.120 --> 00:23:58.549
Thank you Mario. Thanks for the


00:23:58.559 --> 00:24:02.390
question. Um Mario then goes on to you


00:24:02.400 --> 00:24:04.789
know everything he says is absolutely


00:24:04.799 --> 00:24:07.830
right that um uh if you've got a a a


00:24:07.840 --> 00:24:10.310
point of infinite density it's got zero


00:24:10.320 --> 00:24:13.110
dimensions so you can't refer to its


00:24:13.120 --> 00:24:15.909
diameter. Uh what you can refer to is


00:24:15.919 --> 00:24:19.190
its mass because the the mass is uh is


00:24:19.200 --> 00:24:22.710
variable. uh but the fact that it has no


00:24:22.720 --> 00:24:25.269
volume means that when you you know when


00:24:25.279 --> 00:24:26.789
you look at the mass per unit volume


00:24:26.799 --> 00:24:28.470
you've got something of infinite density


00:24:28.480 --> 00:24:31.110
which is how density is defined. So


00:24:31.120 --> 00:24:33.830
Mario is absolutely right. Uh what does


00:24:33.840 --> 00:24:36.310
vary though with the mass is the event


00:24:36.320 --> 00:24:37.909
horizon the diameter of the event


00:24:37.919 --> 00:24:39.269
horizon which you and I have spoken


00:24:39.279 --> 00:24:44.230
about before. Um it's uh uh it's a a


00:24:44.240 --> 00:24:47.750
quantity that I I suppose is important


00:24:47.760 --> 00:24:51.269
because if we are observing an um a


00:24:51.279 --> 00:24:53.029
black hole as we did with the event


00:24:53.039 --> 00:24:54.549
horizon telescope then that's what you


00:24:54.559 --> 00:24:56.549
see. Uh so a big one's going to be


00:24:56.559 --> 00:24:58.149
easier to observe than a smaller one and


00:24:58.159 --> 00:25:00.310
that's why a super massive black hole uh


00:25:00.320 --> 00:25:02.710
in the center of a galaxy called M87 was


00:25:02.720 --> 00:25:04.870
chosen for the the first target for that


00:25:04.880 --> 00:25:07.110
event horizon telescope. But no Mario


00:25:07.120 --> 00:25:09.909
you're quite right. Um it is that uh


00:25:09.919 --> 00:25:11.590
astronomers when if they talk about the


00:25:11.600 --> 00:25:13.190
diameter of a black hole and that


00:25:13.200 --> 00:25:15.510
probably includes me as well uh are


00:25:15.520 --> 00:25:17.190
actually really referring to the event


00:25:17.200 --> 00:25:18.870
horizon because that's the that's the


00:25:18.880 --> 00:25:21.350
parameter. And I love the way Mario


00:25:21.360 --> 00:25:23.430
signs off by saying thanks in advance to


00:25:23.440 --> 00:25:26.950
Dave and Fred although he does say aka


00:25:26.960 --> 00:25:28.070
Andrew.


00:25:28.080 --> 00:25:29.590
>> Yes, that one's going to stick for a


00:25:29.600 --> 00:25:35.110
while. Sorry to say. Thank you Mario.


00:25:35.120 --> 00:25:37.590
Moving on. Uh hi Andrew and Fred. It's


00:25:37.600 --> 00:25:39.350
Andrew from Newcastle with another


00:25:39.360 --> 00:25:41.830
question if I may. Just watched a doco


00:25:41.840 --> 00:25:43.430
on the quest to capture the first


00:25:43.440 --> 00:25:45.909
photograph of a black hole. Uh rather


00:25:45.919 --> 00:25:48.070
accurately the shadow of a black hole as


00:25:48.080 --> 00:25:50.390
Fred so eloquently explained and I


00:25:50.400 --> 00:25:53.029
didn't understand one thing amongst


00:25:53.039 --> 00:25:54.789
others of course with the multiple


00:25:54.799 --> 00:25:56.470
observatories around the world and the


00:25:56.480 --> 00:25:58.390
use of atomic clocks to synchronize the


00:25:58.400 --> 00:26:01.669
data acquisition. Why were they uh on


00:26:01.679 --> 00:26:04.710
tender hooks uh regarding the weather at


00:26:04.720 --> 00:26:07.029
all the sites with bad weather at just


00:26:07.039 --> 00:26:09.110
one putting the whole venture in peril?


00:26:09.120 --> 00:26:11.190
I understand from the show and other


00:26:11.200 --> 00:26:13.110
sources that they were collecting radio


00:26:13.120 --> 00:26:15.510
wavelength data and I thought that this


00:26:15.520 --> 00:26:17.350
was unaffected by the weather and


00:26:17.360 --> 00:26:19.909
atmospheric conditions. I thought that


00:26:19.919 --> 00:26:22.070
was the intrinsic beauty of radio


00:26:22.080 --> 00:26:24.470
astronomy day and night rain and shine.


00:26:24.480 --> 00:26:27.430
Hope you can enlighten me. Wait for it


00:26:27.440 --> 00:26:30.390
but over the radio. Dear, oh dear. H


00:26:30.400 --> 00:26:32.710
Andrew Broadhost. Thank you, Andrew.


00:26:32.720 --> 00:26:34.149
>> That's a great question, Andrew. Leave


00:26:34.159 --> 00:26:37.830
the jokes to me, man.


00:26:37.840 --> 00:26:39.669
>> Yeah. Well, I always leave them to you.


00:26:39.679 --> 00:26:41.669
So,


00:26:41.679 --> 00:26:43.669
>> um if they're good.


00:26:43.679 --> 00:26:45.990
>> Oh gosh. When was the last Oh, never


00:26:46.000 --> 00:26:47.990
mind.


00:26:48.000 --> 00:26:49.909
Uh Andrew's on the money there is, you


00:26:49.919 --> 00:26:51.430
know, I thought radio waves were


00:26:51.440 --> 00:26:53.269
unaffected by the weather. And the


00:26:53.279 --> 00:26:54.870
answer is that radio waves come in


00:26:54.880 --> 00:26:58.149
different flavors. Uh and so what you


00:26:58.159 --> 00:27:01.029
might call low frequency radio waves um


00:27:01.039 --> 00:27:03.510
which are still relatively you know


00:27:03.520 --> 00:27:05.590
they're way outside the medium wave band


00:27:05.600 --> 00:27:07.990
of radio and things of that sort but low


00:27:08.000 --> 00:27:10.870
frequency in radio astronomy um I guess


00:27:10.880 --> 00:27:12.789
goes up to a couple of gigahertz or


00:27:12.799 --> 00:27:15.750
something like that. Um those are


00:27:15.760 --> 00:27:17.990
largely unaffected by weather. That's


00:27:18.000 --> 00:27:19.669
absolutely right. So that's why it can


00:27:19.679 --> 00:27:21.990
be pouring down at parks at the radio


00:27:22.000 --> 00:27:23.669
dish there and the astronomers are still


00:27:23.679 --> 00:27:25.909
happily observing through that. But the


00:27:25.919 --> 00:27:27.830
event horizon telescope used higher


00:27:27.840 --> 00:27:31.029
frequencies. Uh in fact one of the


00:27:31.039 --> 00:27:33.190
telescopes that was incorporated into it


00:27:33.200 --> 00:27:35.669
was ALMA the Atakama large millimeter


00:27:35.679 --> 00:27:38.470
array which has featured very uh very


00:27:38.480 --> 00:27:40.950
widely on space notes. That is a high


00:27:40.960 --> 00:27:42.630
frequency


00:27:42.640 --> 00:27:46.149
uh radio array. In fact they have


00:27:46.159 --> 00:27:49.350
receivers that go up to uh more than 900


00:27:49.360 --> 00:27:51.350
gigahertz. So that's like, you know,


00:27:51.360 --> 00:27:53.350
nearly a thousand times higher


00:27:53.360 --> 00:27:54.870
frequencies than what we've just been


00:27:54.880 --> 00:27:56.950
talking about. And at those sorts of


00:27:56.960 --> 00:27:59.909
frequencies, uh, the weather plays a


00:27:59.919 --> 00:28:02.870
very important role because water vapor


00:28:02.880 --> 00:28:05.510
actually dramatically absorbs the


00:28:05.520 --> 00:28:07.990
microwave signals. And that's what


00:28:08.000 --> 00:28:09.510
experienced that watching satellite


00:28:09.520 --> 00:28:12.950
television. If there is a storm and it


00:28:12.960 --> 00:28:14.789
rains heavily, the wavelengths of the


00:28:14.799 --> 00:28:17.029
raindrops can absorb the signals from


00:28:17.039 --> 00:28:19.750
the satellite and you get nothing.


00:28:19.760 --> 00:28:21.590
That's interesting. I've never tried to


00:28:21.600 --> 00:28:24.149
watch satellite television, so that's


00:28:24.159 --> 00:28:25.430
good thing to know.


00:28:25.440 --> 00:28:26.230
>> Um,


00:28:26.240 --> 00:28:27.990
>> it's one of the pitfalls.


00:28:28.000 --> 00:28:29.750
>> Yes. Yes. In fact, I seldom watch


00:28:29.760 --> 00:28:31.510
television at all. So, that's probably


00:28:31.520 --> 00:28:35.269
why. Um, but but the bottom line is um,


00:28:35.279 --> 00:28:38.549
you know, it's why facilities like ALMA


00:28:38.559 --> 00:28:40.789
and some of the other radio telescopes


00:28:40.799 --> 00:28:44.389
that were used uh to to to be become the


00:28:44.399 --> 00:28:45.750
event horizon telescope, it's why


00:28:45.760 --> 00:28:48.070
they're all at high altitudes. Alma is


00:28:48.080 --> 00:28:51.830
at almost 5,000 meters above sea level.


00:28:51.840 --> 00:28:55.430
Um that's you know 15 16,000 feet and at


00:28:55.440 --> 00:28:57.750
that height there is very little water


00:28:57.760 --> 00:28:59.990
vapor in the atmosphere. Uh but you can


00:29:00.000 --> 00:29:01.830
still get weather and that's why they


00:29:01.840 --> 00:29:03.590
were indeed on tent hooks about the


00:29:03.600 --> 00:29:05.269
weather because they don't want any of


00:29:05.279 --> 00:29:09.110
these if you lose one of those arrays


00:29:09.120 --> 00:29:10.310
and I think there were eight of them


00:29:10.320 --> 00:29:12.070
that came together all around one


00:29:12.080 --> 00:29:14.870
hemisphere of the earth uh to to to make


00:29:14.880 --> 00:29:17.029
up the event horizon telescope. if you


00:29:17.039 --> 00:29:19.430
lose one of them, you lose a significant


00:29:19.440 --> 00:29:21.350
amount of your ability to reconstruct


00:29:21.360 --> 00:29:23.590
the image that they're seeing. Uh, and


00:29:23.600 --> 00:29:25.269
so that was why they were worried that


00:29:25.279 --> 00:29:26.870
the the weather on just one of them


00:29:26.880 --> 00:29:30.230
might be uh moist uh or damper than they


00:29:30.240 --> 00:29:31.669
can cope with and that would have


00:29:31.679 --> 00:29:33.269
screwed up the whole thing. But as it


00:29:33.279 --> 00:29:35.110
happened, it wasn't. It didn't happen


00:29:35.120 --> 00:29:36.549
and it was great.


00:29:36.559 --> 00:29:38.549
>> They got global good weather.


00:29:38.559 --> 00:29:40.149
>> They did global good weather at these


00:29:40.159 --> 00:29:41.510
high altitude sites. That's right.


00:29:41.520 --> 00:29:42.950
>> Did the job. All right, there you are,


00:29:42.960 --> 00:29:45.909
Andrew. Uh, thank you for your question.


00:29:45.919 --> 00:29:47.909
And we've got one more we'll squeeze in


00:29:47.919 --> 00:29:50.710
from John Spoo. I hope I pronounced that


00:29:50.720 --> 00:29:52.070
correctly. John, thanks for your


00:29:52.080 --> 00:29:53.669
question. Hi, I have a question that's


00:29:53.679 --> 00:29:55.430
been bugging me for some time and I need


00:29:55.440 --> 00:29:58.310
an expert to help me out. I think we


00:29:58.320 --> 00:30:00.230
should stop there, Fred.


00:30:00.240 --> 00:30:01.830
>> There's nobody here, is there? Who's


00:30:01.840 --> 00:30:03.190
that? Hang on, I'll go and see if I can


00:30:03.200 --> 00:30:04.149
find somebody.


00:30:04.159 --> 00:30:05.909
>> Maybe the cat could probably answer this


00:30:05.919 --> 00:30:09.190
one. Now, um, imagine a spaceship


00:30:09.200 --> 00:30:11.110
traveling close to the speed of light.


00:30:11.120 --> 00:30:12.710
Disregarding that we don't have that


00:30:12.720 --> 00:30:15.029
sort of propulsion just yet, would the


00:30:15.039 --> 00:30:18.870
increase in its relativistic mass at


00:30:18.880 --> 00:30:20.789
some point turn the spaceship into a


00:30:20.799 --> 00:30:24.070
black hole? And if so, would that spell


00:30:24.080 --> 00:30:26.070
the end of the ship and its crew? Or


00:30:26.080 --> 00:30:27.990
would they be able to slow down to


00:30:28.000 --> 00:30:30.389
reverse the process? What a great


00:30:30.399 --> 00:30:30.870
question.


00:30:30.880 --> 00:30:32.470
>> It is a fantastic question. Do you want


00:30:32.480 --> 00:30:33.669
to have a go at it?


00:30:33.679 --> 00:30:35.909
>> Uh, the answer is no.


00:30:35.919 --> 00:30:37.830
>> It is. You got right. Yeah, you were


00:30:37.840 --> 00:30:39.190
right on the money there. See, see,


00:30:39.200 --> 00:30:40.789
there is an expert. It's called Andrew


00:30:40.799 --> 00:30:42.630
Dunley or Dave


00:30:42.640 --> 00:30:45.750
>> 50/50 chance.


00:30:45.760 --> 00:30:49.510
>> Um, it's a great question and it it the


00:30:49.520 --> 00:30:52.630
answer is a little bit prosaic I think


00:30:52.640 --> 00:30:55.990
and that is that in the in the rest


00:30:56.000 --> 00:30:58.149
frame of the spacecraft


00:30:58.159 --> 00:30:59.990
you know so if you're on the spacecraft


00:31:00.000 --> 00:31:01.590
and you're going at almost the speed of


00:31:01.600 --> 00:31:05.110
light your mass doesn't change. It's


00:31:05.120 --> 00:31:09.110
only in the rest frame of a a stationary


00:31:09.120 --> 00:31:10.549
observer. And by that I mean somebody


00:31:10.559 --> 00:31:12.789
watching you go past. Somebody watches


00:31:12.799 --> 00:31:15.830
you hurl past and your mass gets very


00:31:15.840 --> 00:31:19.110
much higher to the observer.


00:31:19.120 --> 00:31:22.389
>> But to the the inhabitants of the


00:31:22.399 --> 00:31:24.470
spacecraft or the spacecraft itself,


00:31:24.480 --> 00:31:25.669
your mass doesn't change.


00:31:25.679 --> 00:31:27.590
>> It's you're still normal.


00:31:27.600 --> 00:31:29.830
>> Still normal. Yeah. So and the same


00:31:29.840 --> 00:31:31.909
story is true with time dilation. You


00:31:31.919 --> 00:31:33.909
know you're you know that when you go


00:31:33.919 --> 00:31:36.230
nearer the speed of light, your clocks


00:31:36.240 --> 00:31:39.110
tick slower. Uh that's a scene by a


00:31:39.120 --> 00:31:41.909
stationary observer. Uh and so it's the


00:31:41.919 --> 00:31:43.190
same sort of thing. If you're on the


00:31:43.200 --> 00:31:44.789
spacecraft, your clock is ticking at the


00:31:44.799 --> 00:31:46.789
same rate as it ever was. But to a


00:31:46.799 --> 00:31:48.470
stationary observer, your clocks tick


00:31:48.480 --> 00:31:48.950
slower.


00:31:48.960 --> 00:31:50.710
>> And this has been proven with atomic


00:31:50.720 --> 00:31:51.830
clocks, hasn't it?


00:31:51.840 --> 00:31:53.909
>> It has. And indeed with mass as well.


00:31:53.919 --> 00:31:55.669
You can do this. You can see this sort


00:31:55.679 --> 00:31:59.350
of phenomenon with um uh with uh cosmic


00:31:59.360 --> 00:32:01.269
rays which travel very close to the


00:32:01.279 --> 00:32:02.630
speed of light. You can see their mass


00:32:02.640 --> 00:32:06.230
change. So, um, that's from the point of


00:32:06.240 --> 00:32:08.230
view of somebody who's, you know, not


00:32:08.240 --> 00:32:09.990
moving at the same speed. If you're


00:32:10.000 --> 00:32:11.750
moving at the same speed, you don't see


00:32:11.760 --> 00:32:13.750
any change at all.


00:32:13.760 --> 00:32:14.789
>> That's pretty boring.


00:32:14.799 --> 00:32:16.950
>> I mean, the more the more we discuss


00:32:16.960 --> 00:32:18.630
black holes and the number of questions


00:32:18.640 --> 00:32:21.350
we get about them, people are really


00:32:21.360 --> 00:32:25.029
quite captivated by the strangeness of


00:32:25.039 --> 00:32:27.110
them. I suppose they they throw up all


00:32:27.120 --> 00:32:29.750
these things that seem so alien to what


00:32:29.760 --> 00:32:32.230
we consider normal. Uh, and that's


00:32:32.240 --> 00:32:35.110
because we've only experienced uh what's


00:32:35.120 --> 00:32:37.269
happening on our planet any given time.


00:32:37.279 --> 00:32:40.789
So to to try and comprehend um enough


00:32:40.799 --> 00:32:44.470
gravity to warp time to slow things down


00:32:44.480 --> 00:32:46.950
to the observer and and increase mass


00:32:46.960 --> 00:32:50.870
just it's really whack.


00:32:50.880 --> 00:32:52.950
Sad on the brain. That's true. And you


00:32:52.960 --> 00:32:55.110
know, but uh look, John's question there


00:32:55.120 --> 00:32:57.750
is is a great question because it's it's


00:32:57.760 --> 00:33:00.549
not intuitively obvious what is


00:33:00.559 --> 00:33:03.110
happening uh in a situation like


00:33:03.120 --> 00:33:04.470
something traveling close to the speed


00:33:04.480 --> 00:33:07.669
of light and and so he's right to ask


00:33:07.679 --> 00:33:09.909
would that mass actually turn it into a


00:33:09.919 --> 00:33:11.909
black hole? Uh but the answer is no


00:33:11.919 --> 00:33:12.950
because of the reasons that I've


00:33:12.960 --> 00:33:14.710
outlined. But it's great great thinking.


00:33:14.720 --> 00:33:16.230
>> It is indeed. Thank you, John. Thanks


00:33:16.240 --> 00:33:18.230
for the question. Do appreciate it. Keep


00:33:18.240 --> 00:33:19.669
your questions coming in. We're trying


00:33:19.679 --> 00:33:22.310
to um run them down, but they it's it's


00:33:22.320 --> 00:33:25.509
it's an ever growing mass really.


00:33:25.519 --> 00:33:27.509
>> It's all right. Look, as you said


00:33:27.519 --> 00:33:29.430
earlier, Andrew, um all the space


00:33:29.440 --> 00:33:30.870
nutters are going to get together and


00:33:30.880 --> 00:33:32.870
sort them out for themselves and we'll


00:33:32.880 --> 00:33:34.070
be


00:33:34.080 --> 00:33:35.909
>> encourage actually if uh if people want


00:33:35.919 --> 00:33:39.029
to ask questions of the group and and


00:33:39.039 --> 00:33:41.590
discuss it, they Yeah, by all means. Um


00:33:41.600 --> 00:33:43.350
that that's part of the reason we set up


00:33:43.360 --> 00:33:45.830
the Space Nuts podcast group. So, um,


00:33:45.840 --> 00:33:48.389
it's a good opportunity to not only meet


00:33:48.399 --> 00:33:50.630
like-minded people who enjoy these these


00:33:50.640 --> 00:33:52.389
topics, but also to maybe come up with


00:33:52.399 --> 00:33:54.870
your own ideas on on what might be. And,


00:33:54.880 --> 00:33:56.310
you know, I'll keep an eye on it, and if


00:33:56.320 --> 00:33:57.830
something pops in there that we think is


00:33:57.840 --> 00:34:00.310
worthy of further discussion, we will


00:34:00.320 --> 00:34:03.110
certainly investigate that. Uh, thanks


00:34:03.120 --> 00:34:05.590
to everyone who um who who sent in their


00:34:05.600 --> 00:34:08.470
questions uh and contributed and joined


00:34:08.480 --> 00:34:10.790
the Space Nuts podcast group and Patreon


00:34:10.800 --> 00:34:11.909
and everything else. We really


00:34:11.919 --> 00:34:14.149
appreciate it. Uh but most of all we


00:34:14.159 --> 00:34:16.470
appreciate you Fred. Thank you so much.


00:34:16.480 --> 00:34:18.550
>> It's a pleasure. Thank you for having me


00:34:18.560 --> 00:34:19.430
as always.


00:34:19.440 --> 00:34:21.510
>> And we will catch you next week.


00:34:21.520 --> 00:34:24.149
Professor Fred Watson, uh astronomer at


00:34:24.159 --> 00:34:26.149
large. And from me, Andrew Dunley, thank


00:34:26.159 --> 00:34:28.069
you again and we'll catch you next time


00:34:28.079 --> 00:34:30.869
on another edition of Space Nuts.


00:34:30.879 --> 00:34:31.909
>> Space Nuts.


00:34:31.919 --> 00:34:33.990
>> You've been listening to the Space Nuts


00:34:34.000 --> 00:34:36.230
podcast


00:34:36.240 --> 00:34:39.190
>> available at Apple Podcasts, Spotify,


00:34:39.200 --> 00:34:41.829
iHeart Radio, or your favorite podcast


00:34:41.839 --> 00:34:44.230
player. You can also stream on demand at


00:34:44.240 --> 00:34:47.190
byes.com. This has been another quality


00:34:47.200 --> 00:34:51.639
podcast production from byes.com.