Earth’s Core, Hypervelocity Stars & Cosmic Dandruff: #497 - Unraveling the Mysteries Below and...
This episode is brought to you with help of NordVPN. To get the special birthday deal, visit www.nordvpn.com/spacenuts (https://www.nordvpn.com/spacenuts) - you'll be glad you did.
Space Nuts Episode 497: Earth's Core Dynamics, Hypervelocity Stars, and Cosmic Dust
Join Andrew Dunkley and Professor Jonti Horner in this captivating episode of Space Nuts as they delve into the intriguing dynamics of our planet's core, the discovery of a hyperactive star with a planet, and the fascinating phenomenon of cosmic dust. From the slowing of Earth's inner core to the implications of interstellar objects entering our solar system, this episode is filled with insights that will ignite your curiosity about the universe.
Episode Highlights:
- Earth's Core Dynamics: Andrew and Jonti discuss the recent findings regarding the Earth's inner core, revealing that it has been slowing down. They explore how researchers used data from repeating earthquakes to uncover the complexities of the core's rotation and its implications for our understanding of Earth's geology.
- Hypervelocity Stars: The duo introduces the concept of hypervelocity stars and highlights a newly discovered star that is moving at an astonishing speed of nearly 2 million kilometers per hour. They discuss the significance of this find and its connection to the planet orbiting this remarkable star.
- Cosmic Dust from Neighboring Systems: Andrew and Jonti explore the idea of "space dandruff," where neighboring solar systems contribute to the influx of cosmic dust in our own. They discuss simulations that suggest a million objects from the Alpha Centauri system are currently passing through our solar system, and the potential for detecting these interstellar visitors.
- Debate on Planetary Classification: The episode wraps up with a discussion on a newly discovered object that challenges the boundaries between planets and brown dwarfs. Jonti explains the ongoing debate regarding the definitions of these celestial bodies and how new discoveries are prompting scientists to reconsider traditional classifications.
For more Space Nuts, including our continually updating newsfeed and to listen to all our episodes, visit our website. (https://www.spacenutspodcast.com/) Follow us on social media at SpaceNutsPod on Facebook, X, YouTube Music Music, Tumblr, Instagram, and TikTok. We love engaging with our community, so be sure to drop us a message or comment on your favorite platform.
If you'd like to help support Space Nuts and join our growing family of insiders for commercial-free episodes and more, visit spacenutspodcast.com/about (https://www.spacenutspodcast.com/about)
Stay curious, keep looking up, and join us next time for more stellar insights and cosmic wonders. Until then, clear skies and happy stargazing.
00:00 - Introduction to the episode and topics
02:15 - Discussion on Earth's core dynamics and slowing rotation
10:30 - Exploration of hypervelocity stars and their implications
18:00 - The phenomenon of cosmic dust from neighboring systems
26:45 - Debate on planetary classification and the discovery of Gaia 4B
30:00 - Closing thoughts and listener engagement
✍️ Episode References
Earth's Inner Core Research
https://www.nature.com/articles (https://www.nature.com/articles)
Hypervelocity Stars and Planet Discovery
https://www.space.com/hypervelocity-stars (https://www.space.com/hypervelocity-stars)
Cosmic Dust Studies
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019103519302003 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019103519302003)
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/space-nuts-exploring-the-cosmos--2631155/support (https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/space-nuts-exploring-the-cosmos--2631155/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss) .
Episode link: https://play.headliner.app/episode/25683677?utm_source=youtube
00:00 - Introduction to the episode and topics
02:15 - Discussion on Earth’s core dynamics and slowing rotation
10:30 - Exploration of hypervelocity stars and their implications
18:00 - The phenomenon of cosmic dust from neighboring systems
26:45 - Debate on planetary classification and the discovery of Gaia 4B
30:00 - Closing thoughts and listener engagement
Kind: captions
Language: en
00:00:00.599 --> 00:00:02.510
hi there thanks for joining us this is
00:00:02.520 --> 00:00:05.150
Space Nuts my name is Andrew Dunley your
00:00:05.160 --> 00:00:07.309
host great to have your company coming
00:00:07.319 --> 00:00:09.629
up on this episode we are going to look
00:00:09.639 --> 00:00:12.470
at Earth's core and uh it's sort of hit
00:00:12.480 --> 00:00:14.509
the news lately but this is not a new
00:00:14.519 --> 00:00:16.029
story but we thought we better talk
00:00:16.039 --> 00:00:18.550
about it just in case you're wondering
00:00:18.560 --> 00:00:22.109
uh Earth's core uh is uh is slowing down
00:00:22.119 --> 00:00:24.189
or or not doing what you'd think it
00:00:24.199 --> 00:00:26.830
would normally do so we'll talk about
00:00:26.840 --> 00:00:29.109
that there's a hyperactive star out
00:00:29.119 --> 00:00:30.790
there and it's got a Planet what does
00:00:30.800 --> 00:00:32.869
that mean uh it means it's pretty darn
00:00:32.879 --> 00:00:35.869
quick uh we're going to talk space
00:00:35.879 --> 00:00:39.350
dandruff yes it's true and a new planet
00:00:39.360 --> 00:00:41.990
that's sparking a bit of debate on its
00:00:42.000 --> 00:00:44.389
status if we got time if we've got time
00:00:44.399 --> 00:00:46.270
we'll do that one that's all coming up
00:00:46.280 --> 00:00:49.189
on this episode of Space Nuts 15 seconds
00:00:49.199 --> 00:00:53.709
guidance is internal 10 9 ignition
00:00:53.719 --> 00:00:59.470
sequence Space Nuts 5 4 3 2 1 2 3 4 5 5
00:00:59.480 --> 00:01:00.549
4 3
00:01:00.559 --> 00:01:04.670
Space Nuts asut report it feels good he
00:01:04.680 --> 00:01:06.910
back for more Professor johy Horner
00:01:06.920 --> 00:01:08.270
professor of astrophysics at the
00:01:08.280 --> 00:01:10.749
University of Sal Queensland hi Johnny
00:01:10.759 --> 00:01:13.149
hey how are you going I am well how are
00:01:13.159 --> 00:01:15.550
you I'm getting there I'm not a morning
00:01:15.560 --> 00:01:18.030
person was I was saying I got working up
00:01:18.040 --> 00:01:19.670
earlier than I was planning this morning
00:01:19.680 --> 00:01:21.550
by phone call that said can you go on
00:01:21.560 --> 00:01:23.710
live on the radio in five minutes Sor
00:01:23.720 --> 00:01:25.510
got be a zombie on live radio which all
00:01:25.520 --> 00:01:28.069
was good fun those pisty journalists
00:01:28.079 --> 00:01:31.030
here groy ever since I have great
00:01:31.040 --> 00:01:32.830
sympathy for anybody who works a Morning
00:01:32.840 --> 00:01:34.870
Show and we I think we're talking about
00:01:34.880 --> 00:01:38.069
this last week but must be hard but I
00:01:38.079 --> 00:01:40.630
I'm not at my best at 20 to 7 in the
00:01:40.640 --> 00:01:42.789
morning this is a more reasonable time
00:01:42.799 --> 00:01:44.389
but this is still morning it's 20 to 12
00:01:44.399 --> 00:01:45.830
at the
00:01:45.840 --> 00:01:48.350
minute conscious I used to work with a
00:01:48.360 --> 00:01:50.590
journalist who um used to have to do the
00:01:50.600 --> 00:01:52.190
police rounds first thing in the morning
00:01:52.200 --> 00:01:54.510
to get any news from around the the
00:01:54.520 --> 00:01:56.230
various police districts you know car
00:01:56.240 --> 00:01:59.429
crashes all that horrible stuff um fires
00:01:59.439 --> 00:02:00.550
Etc
00:02:00.560 --> 00:02:02.350
uh and after a council meeting they used
00:02:02.360 --> 00:02:04.950
to have to ring the mayor at sparrows in
00:02:04.960 --> 00:02:07.270
the morning we had one particular mayor
00:02:07.280 --> 00:02:10.990
who um was always nearly asleep when
00:02:11.000 --> 00:02:13.190
they called and they could never get a
00:02:13.200 --> 00:02:15.070
good quote from him because he was just
00:02:15.080 --> 00:02:16.869
non-comp
00:02:16.879 --> 00:02:19.750
menst not of the day it was a
00:02:19.760 --> 00:02:21.350
frustration for the journalist I can
00:02:21.360 --> 00:02:22.790
tell you I'm gonna do something at 5
00:02:22.800 --> 00:02:24.390
a.m. I'd rather have stayed up all night
00:02:24.400 --> 00:02:27.790
to do it then set my alarm early yes yes
00:02:27.800 --> 00:02:30.270
well I never had a choice for the odd
00:02:30.280 --> 00:02:32.670
years but anyway that that was my that
00:02:32.680 --> 00:02:34.229
was my choice even though I didn't have
00:02:34.239 --> 00:02:35.990
a choice and now you have your freedom
00:02:36.000 --> 00:02:37.670
so that's I
00:02:37.680 --> 00:02:41.070
do now um let's get down to business uh
00:02:41.080 --> 00:02:43.670
Earth's core the rotation thereof this
00:02:43.680 --> 00:02:45.190
is a story that's been around a little
00:02:45.200 --> 00:02:46.869
while but it keeps popping up it popped
00:02:46.879 --> 00:02:48.790
up again on the weekend and I thought
00:02:48.800 --> 00:02:51.190
well let's talk about it um we may have
00:02:51.200 --> 00:02:53.190
talked about it with Fred I I got an
00:02:53.200 --> 00:02:55.430
inkling that when it first came up we
00:02:55.440 --> 00:02:59.030
went there but um yes it's something
00:02:59.040 --> 00:03:00.949
that the the press is certainly honing
00:03:00.959 --> 00:03:04.110
in on yeah Well's a few little fact toes
00:03:04.120 --> 00:03:05.990
about this that really caught my
00:03:06.000 --> 00:03:07.110
actually when you sent me the link
00:03:07.120 --> 00:03:09.630
through I've managed to miss this one
00:03:09.640 --> 00:03:12.190
these are researchers at the University
00:03:12.200 --> 00:03:15.110
of Southern California so USC and
00:03:15.120 --> 00:03:17.470
they've been looking at earthquake data
00:03:17.480 --> 00:03:19.710
so if we want to study the interior of
00:03:19.720 --> 00:03:21.390
the Earth with the best will in the
00:03:21.400 --> 00:03:23.949
world we can't drill down there you know
00:03:23.959 --> 00:03:25.390
the deepest Hull ever drilled was less
00:03:25.400 --> 00:03:27.710
than 10 kilm I believe and the Earth is
00:03:27.720 --> 00:03:29.789
frustratingly opaque we can't see the
00:03:29.799 --> 00:03:32.270
interior the grounds in the way so we've
00:03:32.280 --> 00:03:33.550
learned everything that we know about
00:03:33.560 --> 00:03:35.789
the interior structure of the Earth the
00:03:35.799 --> 00:03:37.390
cor the mantle how they all behave
00:03:37.400 --> 00:03:39.070
through earthquakes so you get an
00:03:39.080 --> 00:03:41.110
earthquake and seismic waves travel
00:03:41.120 --> 00:03:43.270
outwards in all directions there are two
00:03:43.280 --> 00:03:44.830
different types of seismic waves in a
00:03:44.840 --> 00:03:47.509
very rough sense and when they go from
00:03:47.519 --> 00:03:48.990
one medium to another their speed
00:03:49.000 --> 00:03:50.630
changes and they refract in just the
00:03:50.640 --> 00:03:52.030
same way like does when it enters a
00:03:52.040 --> 00:03:55.110
swimming pool same kind of IA so if
00:03:55.120 --> 00:03:57.670
you're measuring these earthquakes using
00:03:57.680 --> 00:04:00.030
seismal grass from all around the world
00:04:00.040 --> 00:04:01.949
you can back out what the interior of
00:04:01.959 --> 00:04:04.149
the earth looks like in its properties
00:04:04.159 --> 00:04:05.750
by the time it takes a different types
00:04:05.760 --> 00:04:07.309
of seismic waves to reach you
00:04:07.319 --> 00:04:09.429
essentially and by doing that over an
00:04:09.439 --> 00:04:10.949
incredible long time we've got a very
00:04:10.959 --> 00:04:13.350
detailed picture of the Earth's interior
00:04:13.360 --> 00:04:14.830
even down to you know the temperatures
00:04:14.840 --> 00:04:17.069
the pressures the compositions and
00:04:17.079 --> 00:04:18.509
people are monitoring this all the time
00:04:18.519 --> 00:04:21.150
but the finer the detail you want the
00:04:21.160 --> 00:04:23.230
more challenging it is to disentangle
00:04:23.240 --> 00:04:24.710
the information about the earthquake
00:04:24.720 --> 00:04:25.790
itself from the information you're
00:04:25.800 --> 00:04:27.830
learning about the interior and this is
00:04:27.840 --> 00:04:30.029
something we see a lot with fing exop
00:04:30.039 --> 00:04:32.110
planets there a perverse analogy here
00:04:32.120 --> 00:04:34.310
that we're looking at light from stars
00:04:34.320 --> 00:04:35.790
and to get a really good idea of what
00:04:35.800 --> 00:04:37.070
the planet's like you've got to
00:04:37.080 --> 00:04:39.670
understand the star first because that
00:04:39.680 --> 00:04:41.270
is overlaid on the DAT and you've got to
00:04:41.280 --> 00:04:44.350
disentangle them so to get a real handle
00:04:44.360 --> 00:04:46.510
on the fine details of what's going in
00:04:46.520 --> 00:04:48.590
in terms of the earth your ideal
00:04:48.600 --> 00:04:49.909
situation would be to have every
00:04:49.919 --> 00:04:52.710
earthquake be identical to the last so
00:04:52.720 --> 00:04:54.110
that all the earthquakes were the same
00:04:54.120 --> 00:04:55.950
and you could take that out of your
00:04:55.960 --> 00:04:57.430
analysis you could essentially account
00:04:57.440 --> 00:04:59.790
for that and that was the first thing I
00:04:59.800 --> 00:05:00.990
this article that I thought was really
00:05:01.000 --> 00:05:02.469
interesting I mean obviously the results
00:05:02.479 --> 00:05:03.950
are cool but it's the where they got
00:05:03.960 --> 00:05:07.469
them they looked at this sample of what
00:05:07.479 --> 00:05:10.749
a described as um repeating earthquakes
00:05:10.759 --> 00:05:12.270
they got data from these earthquakes
00:05:12.280 --> 00:05:15.670
near the South Sandwich Islands 121 of
00:05:15.680 --> 00:05:18.110
these that occurred between 1991 and
00:05:18.120 --> 00:05:21.230
2023 and it says repeating earthquakes
00:05:21.240 --> 00:05:22.830
are seismic events that occur at the
00:05:22.840 --> 00:05:25.629
same location and produce identical
00:05:25.639 --> 00:05:28.029
seismograms so rather than using all the
00:05:28.039 --> 00:05:30.150
earthquakes from all around the world
00:05:30.160 --> 00:05:32.350
they used this one subset that gave them
00:05:32.360 --> 00:05:34.110
very controlled data and that lets you
00:05:34.120 --> 00:05:36.790
get very fine resolution on the things
00:05:36.800 --> 00:05:38.670
you're looking at because you're not
00:05:38.680 --> 00:05:41.029
adding extra noise essentially and by
00:05:41.039 --> 00:05:42.469
doing all this they learned a couple of
00:05:42.479 --> 00:05:44.830
new things about the Earth's inner core
00:05:44.840 --> 00:05:46.350
so we've known for a while that while
00:05:46.360 --> 00:05:47.909
the Earth has a core the core actually
00:05:47.919 --> 00:05:49.830
has two layers it's got a molten outer
00:05:49.840 --> 00:05:52.670
core which the iron and the nickel are
00:05:52.680 --> 00:05:54.350
essentially liquid they're moving well
00:05:54.360 --> 00:05:56.150
they're molten so they're a fluid they
00:05:56.160 --> 00:05:58.830
move around and that movement is tied to
00:05:58.840 --> 00:06:00.749
the formation of the magnetic field you
00:06:00.759 --> 00:06:03.629
get the induced magnetism that gives us
00:06:03.639 --> 00:06:05.749
the magnetic field interior to that
00:06:05.759 --> 00:06:07.029
where the pressure is high even though
00:06:07.039 --> 00:06:09.230
the temperature is so high the pressure
00:06:09.240 --> 00:06:10.790
is such that the inner core has been
00:06:10.800 --> 00:06:12.070
thought to be
00:06:12.080 --> 00:06:14.629
solid and so you've got a solid with a
00:06:14.639 --> 00:06:16.309
liquid layer outside and then the molten
00:06:16.319 --> 00:06:17.790
layer of the mantle then the solid layer
00:06:17.800 --> 00:06:20.150
of the crust as a rough kind of
00:06:20.160 --> 00:06:22.309
structure what these new results have
00:06:22.319 --> 00:06:24.390
shown is the headline Act is that that
00:06:24.400 --> 00:06:26.710
inner core doesn't spin perfectly
00:06:26.720 --> 00:06:29.270
constantly it had apparently for a long
00:06:29.280 --> 00:06:31.350
period of time which I wasn't aware of
00:06:31.360 --> 00:06:33.390
people were aware that the spin speed of
00:06:33.400 --> 00:06:35.710
that inner cor was gradually increasing
00:06:35.720 --> 00:06:37.390
it was speeding up a little bit almost
00:06:37.400 --> 00:06:39.629
in perceptibly but what this research
00:06:39.639 --> 00:06:42.270
has shown is that more recently it has
00:06:42.280 --> 00:06:44.350
now started to slow down again so that's
00:06:44.360 --> 00:06:46.230
a headline act the inner cor has slowed
00:06:46.240 --> 00:06:48.029
down a little bit and they're talking
00:06:48.039 --> 00:06:49.629
about here at a scale of about a
00:06:49.639 --> 00:06:51.870
thousandth of a second for the rotation
00:06:51.880 --> 00:06:54.670
period so it's a tiny effect but they
00:06:54.680 --> 00:06:56.749
can measure it thanks to these repeating
00:06:56.759 --> 00:06:59.070
earthquakes that have the same signature
00:06:59.080 --> 00:07:00.670
that allows them to get a much better
00:07:00.680 --> 00:07:03.230
resolution on the data the other thing
00:07:03.240 --> 00:07:05.589
which I think is very interesting that
00:07:05.599 --> 00:07:06.990
isn't in the main press release but is
00:07:07.000 --> 00:07:08.309
in a couple of the other articles is
00:07:08.319 --> 00:07:10.589
that these same data suggests that the
00:07:10.599 --> 00:07:12.510
inner core is not totally solid but
00:07:12.520 --> 00:07:15.670
actually has molten areas within it so
00:07:15.680 --> 00:07:17.189
this is a bit of a change to the
00:07:17.199 --> 00:07:19.350
Paradigm we had of this very simple
00:07:19.360 --> 00:07:21.150
model of a solid inner core then a
00:07:21.160 --> 00:07:24.110
molten outer core that there's actually
00:07:24.120 --> 00:07:26.469
a bit of molten to the inner core as
00:07:26.479 --> 00:07:28.950
well which probably makes a bit of sense
00:07:28.960 --> 00:07:30.830
in the context of this thing's rotation
00:07:30.840 --> 00:07:32.510
changing over time if you've got bits
00:07:32.520 --> 00:07:34.390
that are melting bits that are moving
00:07:34.400 --> 00:07:36.469
around a little bit you're moving
00:07:36.479 --> 00:07:38.550
angular momentum around so therefore
00:07:38.560 --> 00:07:40.629
you'll change the rotation period in
00:07:40.639 --> 00:07:42.110
just the same way that the rotation
00:07:42.120 --> 00:07:44.309
period of the Earth as a whole will
00:07:44.319 --> 00:07:46.550
change if the ice caps melt will change
00:07:46.560 --> 00:07:47.670
in a measurable way because you're
00:07:47.680 --> 00:07:49.189
moving Mass from the poles to the
00:07:49.199 --> 00:07:51.550
equator redistributing that mass will
00:07:51.560 --> 00:07:53.070
mean that the earth spin will slow a
00:07:53.080 --> 00:07:56.589
little bit to conserve angular momenta
00:07:56.599 --> 00:07:59.110
so it's a fascinating story and I think
00:07:59.120 --> 00:08:01.230
yes the headline side of it the inner
00:08:01.240 --> 00:08:04.230
core has slow down that's interesting
00:08:04.240 --> 00:08:05.749
that's a headline story but to me the
00:08:05.759 --> 00:08:07.950
really interesting stuff was to how of
00:08:07.960 --> 00:08:10.110
how they figure that out and the
00:08:10.120 --> 00:08:12.270
subtleties of the choice of earthquakes
00:08:12.280 --> 00:08:14.270
to use and the additional things they
00:08:14.280 --> 00:08:15.909
can figure out is really shows the
00:08:15.919 --> 00:08:18.790
benefit of continuing to get longer data
00:08:18.800 --> 00:08:20.629
sets and reanalyzing what you thought
00:08:20.639 --> 00:08:22.629
you knew when you've got better data and
00:08:22.639 --> 00:08:24.309
better instruments so it's a very cool
00:08:24.319 --> 00:08:26.589
story and do encourage people to have a
00:08:26.599 --> 00:08:27.830
look around there's a few different
00:08:27.840 --> 00:08:29.550
versions of the story out there on the
00:08:29.560 --> 00:08:32.190
web um even CNN covered it at one point
00:08:32.200 --> 00:08:34.949
so it's got interest and by reading a
00:08:34.959 --> 00:08:37.070
variety of stories you can get some of
00:08:37.080 --> 00:08:38.469
the different cool facts that maybe the
00:08:38.479 --> 00:08:41.750
M press release didn't pick up on yeah
00:08:41.760 --> 00:08:45.150
they figured this out by studying what
00:08:45.160 --> 00:08:49.509
is21 earthquakes between 1991 and 2024
00:08:49.519 --> 00:08:53.350
yes uh how accurate do you perceive
00:08:53.360 --> 00:08:57.190
their data to be well I I trust at the
00:08:57.200 --> 00:08:58.550
end of the day it's peer reviewed and
00:08:58.560 --> 00:09:00.269
published so there's a certain
00:09:00.279 --> 00:09:03.030
confidence of fidelity there that's good
00:09:03.040 --> 00:09:05.630
and I find their data selection really
00:09:05.640 --> 00:09:07.550
interesting there the fact that you've
00:09:07.560 --> 00:09:09.030
got thousands of earthquakes happening
00:09:09.040 --> 00:09:10.269
all the time you know we see what's
00:09:10.279 --> 00:09:12.670
happening in Santeria at the minute with
00:09:12.680 --> 00:09:14.710
what is probably a very large motion of
00:09:14.720 --> 00:09:18.230
magma underneath that ancient volcano
00:09:18.240 --> 00:09:19.750
that suggests it may well erupt again at
00:09:19.760 --> 00:09:22.430
some point similarly under Naples so
00:09:22.440 --> 00:09:24.110
earthquakes are happening all the time
00:09:24.120 --> 00:09:26.230
all around the world and what I loved
00:09:26.240 --> 00:09:27.990
about this was finding this subset of
00:09:28.000 --> 00:09:30.030
earthquakes that happening recurrently
00:09:30.040 --> 00:09:32.190
at the same place that are giving them
00:09:32.200 --> 00:09:34.630
the same signal which makes a data
00:09:34.640 --> 00:09:37.630
analysis much much much better I just
00:09:37.640 --> 00:09:40.710
really like that and it's why in exactly
00:09:40.720 --> 00:09:42.910
the same way that we can find planets
00:09:42.920 --> 00:09:44.710
using our radial velocity the wobble
00:09:44.720 --> 00:09:46.990
method much more easily around quiet
00:09:47.000 --> 00:09:50.150
Stars than active STS because active
00:09:50.160 --> 00:09:51.949
stars are roiling and bubbling and
00:09:51.959 --> 00:09:55.030
boiling so the lines of the spectrum of
00:09:55.040 --> 00:09:56.990
the star are moving around because of
00:09:57.000 --> 00:09:58.750
the properties of the star that
00:09:58.760 --> 00:10:01.150
introduces a lot of nights when you've
00:10:01.160 --> 00:10:03.030
got a quiet sour of s that isn't very
00:10:03.040 --> 00:10:05.470
active a bit like the sun is that noise
00:10:05.480 --> 00:10:07.670
is much less which means that you can
00:10:07.680 --> 00:10:09.910
resolve much smaller motions facts to
00:10:09.920 --> 00:10:12.150
the planets and so you can detect
00:10:12.160 --> 00:10:13.990
smaller planets around stars that are
00:10:14.000 --> 00:10:17.069
less active and and it's a direct
00:10:17.079 --> 00:10:19.430
parallel here by getting a much simpler
00:10:19.440 --> 00:10:20.910
set of earthquakes that all behave the
00:10:20.920 --> 00:10:22.990
same way you reduce the nois and
00:10:23.000 --> 00:10:24.190
therefore you can get a much more
00:10:24.200 --> 00:10:25.430
accurate impression of what's going on
00:10:25.440 --> 00:10:27.990
in the interior so I guess if you want
00:10:28.000 --> 00:10:30.389
to look at time scale changes in the
00:10:30.399 --> 00:10:32.310
mantle and stuff like that you can use
00:10:32.320 --> 00:10:34.069
all the data set and map it that way but
00:10:34.079 --> 00:10:35.190
for something like this way you need
00:10:35.200 --> 00:10:37.550
that really fine tooth comb it's a
00:10:37.560 --> 00:10:39.990
beautiful way of doing it yeah yeah it's
00:10:40.000 --> 00:10:41.910
fascinating story it's uh yeah we're so
00:10:41.920 --> 00:10:43.550
close to it compared to everything else
00:10:43.560 --> 00:10:47.190
we study oh yeah in Moss but it's um
00:10:47.200 --> 00:10:50.110
yeah it's invisible to us we have to
00:10:50.120 --> 00:10:51.870
yeah we have to dig deep boom boom
00:10:51.880 --> 00:10:54.030
techniques that are getting developed
00:10:54.040 --> 00:10:56.710
from this then apply in astronomy and in
00:10:56.720 --> 00:10:58.190
planetary science you know we talked
00:10:58.200 --> 00:11:00.269
previously about in it which sat on Mars
00:11:00.279 --> 00:11:02.590
and recorded Mars Quakes and that was
00:11:02.600 --> 00:11:04.310
just single station I would love at some
00:11:04.320 --> 00:11:06.870
point in the future perhaps when um
00:11:06.880 --> 00:11:08.790
seron decides that he's finally going to
00:11:08.800 --> 00:11:10.710
move to Mars if he could take some
00:11:10.720 --> 00:11:12.870
seismometers with him and drop them in a
00:11:12.880 --> 00:11:15.190
variety of positions that'll give us a
00:11:15.200 --> 00:11:17.470
lot more information on Mar's interior
00:11:17.480 --> 00:11:19.110
similarly these kind of techniques are
00:11:19.120 --> 00:11:20.430
very similar to what my colleagues at
00:11:20.440 --> 00:11:21.750
the University of Southern Queensland
00:11:21.760 --> 00:11:24.389
and elsewhere around the sphere of
00:11:24.399 --> 00:11:26.750
Academia used to study the Interiors of
00:11:26.760 --> 00:11:28.310
starss you've got the same problem you
00:11:28.320 --> 00:11:29.790
look at the Sun
00:11:29.800 --> 00:11:31.710
and it's our nearest star but all we see
00:11:31.720 --> 00:11:33.590
is the surface you can't see inside it
00:11:33.600 --> 00:11:35.710
because the surface is in the way yeah
00:11:35.720 --> 00:11:36.870
how do we know about the structure in
00:11:36.880 --> 00:11:38.590
the interior it's exactly the same kind
00:11:38.600 --> 00:11:40.310
of thing they're doing here but using
00:11:40.320 --> 00:11:43.949
star Quakes and star wobbles rather than
00:11:43.959 --> 00:11:45.829
earthquakes yeah really interesting
00:11:45.839 --> 00:11:47.949
stuff and if you'd like to read more
00:11:47.959 --> 00:11:50.870
about the inner core of our own Planet
00:11:50.880 --> 00:11:53.030
slowing down just do a search for that
00:11:53.040 --> 00:11:55.310
there it's everywhere you can find it on
00:11:55.320 --> 00:12:00.069
Discover magazine and a few other sites
00:12:00.079 --> 00:12:01.629
let's take a little break from the show
00:12:01.639 --> 00:12:04.509
to tell you about our sponsor
00:12:04.519 --> 00:12:07.389
nordvpn now I've been using nordvpn for
00:12:07.399 --> 00:12:10.389
almost 2 years and without a word of a
00:12:10.399 --> 00:12:13.670
lie I have been very impressed not only
00:12:13.680 --> 00:12:15.310
with their VPN but all their other
00:12:15.320 --> 00:12:19.990
products I've used VPN overseas yes but
00:12:20.000 --> 00:12:22.829
also uh I use it in my day-to-day
00:12:22.839 --> 00:12:24.590
activities I've set it up on my
00:12:24.600 --> 00:12:27.829
smartphone and it's always on and it
00:12:27.839 --> 00:12:30.509
keeps me protected 24 4 hours a day and
00:12:30.519 --> 00:12:33.230
no I do not notice any difference in the
00:12:33.240 --> 00:12:34.990
performance of my phone when browsing
00:12:35.000 --> 00:12:37.710
the internet on Wi-Fi or mobile or cell
00:12:37.720 --> 00:12:41.590
towers it's seamless it's simple to use
00:12:41.600 --> 00:12:44.629
and you can load it onto 10 devices
00:12:44.639 --> 00:12:47.870
including your smart TV uh your tablet
00:12:47.880 --> 00:12:50.949
your PC your MacBook whatever uh as a
00:12:50.959 --> 00:12:53.629
Space Nuts listener Nord has a special
00:12:53.639 --> 00:12:56.430
birthday offer with big savings for you
00:12:56.440 --> 00:12:58.430
and I'll give you that URL shortly so
00:12:58.440 --> 00:13:00.550
you can take advant AG first of all
00:13:00.560 --> 00:13:02.310
there's an extra 4 months available for
00:13:02.320 --> 00:13:04.150
free if you sign on for their 2-year
00:13:04.160 --> 00:13:06.069
plan but right now they're offering a
00:13:06.079 --> 00:13:08.790
Nord coupon as a part of the deal which
00:13:08.800 --> 00:13:12.030
offers 6 months of nordvpn that you can
00:13:12.040 --> 00:13:15.389
use yourself or share with someone else
00:13:15.399 --> 00:13:16.870
uh you can check out all their deals and
00:13:16.880 --> 00:13:18.550
services at
00:13:18.560 --> 00:13:21.790
nordvpn.com SPAC nuts for their
00:13:21.800 --> 00:13:24.509
exclusive deal for Space Nuts listeners
00:13:24.519 --> 00:13:25.750
that's
00:13:25.760 --> 00:13:27.350
nordvpn.com
00:13:27.360 --> 00:13:30.949
SPAC nuts and they back their gear they
00:13:30.959 --> 00:13:33.389
have a 30-day money back guarantee don't
00:13:33.399 --> 00:13:35.629
forget about that
00:13:35.639 --> 00:13:39.629
nordvpn.com SLS Space Nuts check it out
00:13:39.639 --> 00:13:46.590
today now back to the show 3 2 1 Space
00:13:46.600 --> 00:13:49.829
Nuts uh now let's go to this uh story
00:13:49.839 --> 00:13:52.590
that is talking about a star that's been
00:13:52.600 --> 00:13:55.389
described as hyperactive this this is a
00:13:55.399 --> 00:13:57.509
star that's moving well it's probably
00:13:57.519 --> 00:14:00.670
one of the fastest if not the fastest
00:14:00.680 --> 00:14:03.110
ever discovered this this story is quite
00:14:03.120 --> 00:14:06.430
amazing yeah so this is what's called a
00:14:06.440 --> 00:14:08.350
hyper velocity star and we do know a few
00:14:08.360 --> 00:14:10.749
of these in the Milky Way these are
00:14:10.759 --> 00:14:12.910
stars that are traveling at such a high
00:14:12.920 --> 00:14:15.310
speed that they're traveling faster than
00:14:15.320 --> 00:14:17.110
the local escape velocity for the Galaxy
00:14:17.120 --> 00:14:19.069
at their location so we're on the
00:14:19.079 --> 00:14:20.430
surface of the Earth and if I throw a
00:14:20.440 --> 00:14:22.269
tennis ball up in the air it will fall
00:14:22.279 --> 00:14:24.590
back down I'll catch it or I'll fail to
00:14:24.600 --> 00:14:26.470
catch it because I'm English and the
00:14:26.480 --> 00:14:27.949
English Cricket team's doing terribly at
00:14:27.959 --> 00:14:29.310
the minutes I'll probably fail to catch
00:14:29.320 --> 00:14:31.389
it because that's where I'm from
00:14:31.399 --> 00:14:34.430
originally if I threw it hard enough the
00:14:34.440 --> 00:14:36.069
Earth's gravity wouldn't be able to hold
00:14:36.079 --> 00:14:38.150
on to it and it would escape and for the
00:14:38.160 --> 00:14:41.670
Earth that's about 11 kilm a second the
00:14:41.680 --> 00:14:43.749
more massive you are the higher that
00:14:43.759 --> 00:14:45.350
velocity is but the further you are from
00:14:45.360 --> 00:14:47.590
the mass the lower that velocity is I
00:14:47.600 --> 00:14:49.069
it's the kind of thing we teach in first
00:14:49.079 --> 00:14:51.110
year astrophysics as an equation for the
00:14:51.120 --> 00:14:53.749
escape Velocity um where you can work it
00:14:53.759 --> 00:14:55.269
out and I think it's a square root of 2
00:14:55.279 --> 00:14:58.030
GM over R um
00:14:58.040 --> 00:15:00.749
now sounds about right so that's
00:15:00.759 --> 00:15:02.470
basically it's related to the mass of
00:15:02.480 --> 00:15:04.590
the thing you're going around and the
00:15:04.600 --> 00:15:06.230
and it's inversely proportional to the
00:15:06.240 --> 00:15:08.710
distance you are away from that thing
00:15:08.720 --> 00:15:10.590
with a square root
00:15:10.600 --> 00:15:13.110
there what that means is that anything
00:15:13.120 --> 00:15:16.150
that has mass has an escape velocity so
00:15:16.160 --> 00:15:17.990
technically I have an escape velocity if
00:15:18.000 --> 00:15:20.590
you put me in the vacuum of space far
00:15:20.600 --> 00:15:22.509
away from any Star and give me that
00:15:22.519 --> 00:15:25.030
tennis ball I could in theory nudge it
00:15:25.040 --> 00:15:26.949
gently and make it orbit me but if I
00:15:26.959 --> 00:15:29.470
nudge too hard it would Escape but even
00:15:29.480 --> 00:15:31.309
though I'm far too heavy my
00:15:31.319 --> 00:15:33.509
gravitational pull is incredibly weak
00:15:33.519 --> 00:15:36.269
because I'm only 130 kilos not the mass
00:15:36.279 --> 00:15:37.470
of the
00:15:37.480 --> 00:15:39.509
Earth what that means from the point of
00:15:39.519 --> 00:15:41.670
view of our galaxy is that our galaxy
00:15:41.680 --> 00:15:43.350
has an escape velocity that varies
00:15:43.360 --> 00:15:45.110
depending on where you are in the
00:15:45.120 --> 00:15:47.590
galaxy nearer you are to the middle the
00:15:47.600 --> 00:15:48.829
higher the speed you need to be
00:15:48.839 --> 00:15:50.829
traveling is to escap just as in the
00:15:50.839 --> 00:15:53.550
solar system it's harder to escap from
00:15:53.560 --> 00:15:55.710
the sun when you know Mercury's orbit
00:15:55.720 --> 00:15:58.670
than it is when you know ne's orbit so
00:15:58.680 --> 00:15:59.790
that
00:15:59.800 --> 00:16:01.590
how stars move and a small fraction of
00:16:01.600 --> 00:16:03.389
the stars in our galaxy because they're
00:16:03.399 --> 00:16:05.069
constantly moving around all the other
00:16:05.079 --> 00:16:07.470
stars because there things going on a
00:16:07.480 --> 00:16:08.749
small number of those Stars will
00:16:08.759 --> 00:16:11.069
eventually get ejected from the Galaxy
00:16:11.079 --> 00:16:13.189
entirely now quite a few of these
00:16:13.199 --> 00:16:15.150
actually that are previously known are
00:16:15.160 --> 00:16:17.710
linked to stars that were in a binary
00:16:17.720 --> 00:16:20.069
star system that was quite close and
00:16:20.079 --> 00:16:21.670
then one of the components went
00:16:21.680 --> 00:16:24.069
supernova and suddenly there it's like
00:16:24.079 --> 00:16:25.509
the lead was cut so suddenly they're
00:16:25.519 --> 00:16:27.910
rejected at very high speed right but
00:16:27.920 --> 00:16:28.910
that's not the only way you can
00:16:28.920 --> 00:16:31.949
conformed that hypervelocity stars and
00:16:31.959 --> 00:16:34.470
are these Stars whose speed is so high
00:16:34.480 --> 00:16:36.110
that they will probably escape and never
00:16:36.120 --> 00:16:37.749
return that will wonder the void between
00:16:37.759 --> 00:16:39.910
the galaxies in a very lonely life
00:16:39.920 --> 00:16:41.230
forever
00:16:41.240 --> 00:16:44.069
more the other side of this story is
00:16:44.079 --> 00:16:46.550
planet detection we've talked before
00:16:46.560 --> 00:16:48.389
about how the two most successful
00:16:48.399 --> 00:16:50.069
methods for finding planets are the
00:16:50.079 --> 00:16:51.629
transit method and the radio velocity
00:16:51.639 --> 00:16:53.430
method essentially seeing Stars wobble
00:16:53.440 --> 00:16:56.110
and wink there is a method a technique
00:16:56.120 --> 00:16:58.910
called gravitational micr lensing that
00:16:58.920 --> 00:17:00.629
if you went back to the late '90s people
00:17:00.639 --> 00:17:02.829
were really hoping it would find
00:17:02.839 --> 00:17:04.470
gazillions of planets that it would be
00:17:04.480 --> 00:17:06.870
really successful and it's never quite
00:17:06.880 --> 00:17:09.230
found as many as people expected because
00:17:09.240 --> 00:17:11.510
it's fundamentally hard to do it's not
00:17:11.520 --> 00:17:12.909
that these events aren't happening it's
00:17:12.919 --> 00:17:15.069
just that they're very hard to observe
00:17:15.079 --> 00:17:17.230
but going back to 2011 a team of
00:17:17.240 --> 00:17:18.870
scientists that were looking towards the
00:17:18.880 --> 00:17:21.069
galactic core where you've got the most
00:17:21.079 --> 00:17:23.870
stars on the sky in the smallest area
00:17:23.880 --> 00:17:25.750
observed a gravitational microlensing
00:17:25.760 --> 00:17:27.390
event they saw a background star
00:17:27.400 --> 00:17:30.590
brightened and then fed away again but
00:17:30.600 --> 00:17:32.310
it had a double peak in the brightness
00:17:32.320 --> 00:17:34.750
so there were two peaks as it went up
00:17:34.760 --> 00:17:35.990
and then it went up further and then it
00:17:36.000 --> 00:17:38.390
fell away again and that was indicating
00:17:38.400 --> 00:17:40.110
that in the foreground between us and
00:17:40.120 --> 00:17:42.590
that star something had passed in front
00:17:42.600 --> 00:17:45.350
that had mass that mass curving
00:17:45.360 --> 00:17:47.990
SpaceTime acted as a lens bent a little
00:17:48.000 --> 00:17:49.070
bit more of the light from the
00:17:49.080 --> 00:17:50.590
background star towards us and that's
00:17:50.600 --> 00:17:52.870
why we saw the star brighten and then as
00:17:52.880 --> 00:17:54.310
the thing in the foreground moved away
00:17:54.320 --> 00:17:56.149
again the lens went away and it faded
00:17:56.159 --> 00:17:59.470
away again and when these events happen
00:17:59.480 --> 00:18:01.070
you could infer quite a lot from
00:18:01.080 --> 00:18:02.950
studying the degree to which the thing
00:18:02.960 --> 00:18:05.190
brightened and faded and also the time
00:18:05.200 --> 00:18:06.669
scale over which it
00:18:06.679 --> 00:18:08.870
happened and the team at the time
00:18:08.880 --> 00:18:10.510
announce their results this is really
00:18:10.520 --> 00:18:12.510
exciting but there's a little bit of
00:18:12.520 --> 00:18:14.630
what we call a degeneracy there are two
00:18:14.640 --> 00:18:17.350
different models that can equally well
00:18:17.360 --> 00:18:20.110
explain what we've observed the first is
00:18:20.120 --> 00:18:21.630
that you've got a star that's about a
00:18:21.640 --> 00:18:23.789
fifth of the mass of the sun with a
00:18:23.799 --> 00:18:26.110
planet that is about 29 times the mass
00:18:26.120 --> 00:18:29.510
of the Earth that's scenario 1 so you've
00:18:29.520 --> 00:18:31.750
got a star with a planet the other
00:18:31.760 --> 00:18:34.789
scenario is that you had a planet the
00:18:34.799 --> 00:18:37.149
mass of Jupiter with a tiny little Moon
00:18:37.159 --> 00:18:39.029
and in either case the ratio of the mass
00:18:39.039 --> 00:18:40.110
between the big thing and the little
00:18:40.120 --> 00:18:43.270
thing is about 2300 times either of
00:18:43.280 --> 00:18:46.149
these scenarios could explain perfectly
00:18:46.159 --> 00:18:48.390
well what was seen so how do we
00:18:48.400 --> 00:18:50.270
differentiate between them well one
00:18:50.280 --> 00:18:51.830
thing we can do now that we've got
00:18:51.840 --> 00:18:54.310
better telescope some better technology
00:18:54.320 --> 00:18:56.950
is to use theek telescopes which are
00:18:56.960 --> 00:18:58.310
among the biggest in the world they're
00:18:58.320 --> 00:19:01.230
incred instruments in South America and
00:19:01.240 --> 00:19:03.390
also the Gia spacecraft which has been
00:19:03.400 --> 00:19:04.750
it's just finished its Mission but it
00:19:04.760 --> 00:19:07.669
spent 12 years in orbit mapping the
00:19:07.679 --> 00:19:10.110
positions of em motions of up to two
00:19:10.120 --> 00:19:12.909
billion stars with unprecedented
00:19:12.919 --> 00:19:15.470
mindboggling accuracy so the team that
00:19:15.480 --> 00:19:17.950
found this object in 2011 saw this
00:19:17.960 --> 00:19:19.710
signal in the gravitational micr lensing
00:19:19.720 --> 00:19:22.190
said one way that we could distinguish
00:19:22.200 --> 00:19:25.549
between those two different models is to
00:19:25.559 --> 00:19:27.630
look for the thing that caused the
00:19:27.640 --> 00:19:29.190
lensing
00:19:29.200 --> 00:19:31.149
if it's a star in theory there'll be a
00:19:31.159 --> 00:19:32.710
point of light there that's moving that
00:19:32.720 --> 00:19:34.230
we can see that we can track back and
00:19:34.240 --> 00:19:35.830
say it was in the right place at the
00:19:35.840 --> 00:19:38.230
right time we'll be able to see it and
00:19:38.240 --> 00:19:39.470
that shows that the thing that did the
00:19:39.480 --> 00:19:41.190
lensing was a star so it's a star and a
00:19:41.200 --> 00:19:44.510
planet if we see nothing then the star
00:19:44.520 --> 00:19:46.149
doesn't work because if there was a star
00:19:46.159 --> 00:19:47.430
there we'd see it so it must be the
00:19:47.440 --> 00:19:49.990
other scenario so they went away and dug
00:19:50.000 --> 00:19:51.590
through that data and it took them a bit
00:19:51.600 --> 00:19:53.830
longer than expected but they finally
00:19:53.840 --> 00:19:56.510
found a star that is moving ridiculously
00:19:56.520 --> 00:19:58.270
quickly but was in exactly the right
00:19:58.280 --> 00:20:00.310
place at the right time to cause the
00:20:00.320 --> 00:20:02.510
micro lensing event and that star is
00:20:02.520 --> 00:20:04.149
also quite near the middle of the Galaxy
00:20:04.159 --> 00:20:06.750
so it's quite it was quite far from us
00:20:06.760 --> 00:20:08.230
quite near the thing it was lensing at
00:20:08.240 --> 00:20:10.630
the time they've tracked it back and it
00:20:10.640 --> 00:20:12.750
turns out that the movement of this star
00:20:12.760 --> 00:20:14.350
just at right angle through our line of
00:20:14.360 --> 00:20:17.149
sight so the movement across the sky
00:20:17.159 --> 00:20:19.390
gives it a speed that is almost two
00:20:19.400 --> 00:20:23.549
million kilometers per hour 540
00:20:23.559 --> 00:20:26.549
kilometers per second glimy that is
00:20:26.559 --> 00:20:28.990
ridiculous you know
00:20:29.000 --> 00:20:30.950
Stars nearby near the Sun that moving
00:20:30.960 --> 00:20:32.470
around we typically talk of speeds of
00:20:32.480 --> 00:20:34.149
tens of kilometers a second maybe a bit
00:20:34.159 --> 00:20:37.630
more than 100 so 540 is ridiculously
00:20:37.640 --> 00:20:39.950
extreme and is already almost the escape
00:20:39.960 --> 00:20:42.630
velocity of the Galaxy at that point now
00:20:42.640 --> 00:20:44.190
the unknown here is that there could be
00:20:44.200 --> 00:20:45.950
some movement towards our away fromers
00:20:45.960 --> 00:20:48.630
as well so we only see the movement on
00:20:48.640 --> 00:20:51.909
the sky and essentially any movement
00:20:51.919 --> 00:20:54.350
that is radial toward us or away from us
00:20:54.360 --> 00:20:56.310
will be enough to mean that this thing
00:20:56.320 --> 00:20:58.230
is Unbound by the Galaxy that it will
00:20:58.240 --> 00:20:59.110
eventually
00:20:59.120 --> 00:21:01.909
escar it is therefore a hypervelocity
00:21:01.919 --> 00:21:04.070
star and this is the very first time a
00:21:04.080 --> 00:21:05.590
planet has been confirmed around the
00:21:05.600 --> 00:21:08.510
hypervelocity star now planets will form
00:21:08.520 --> 00:21:10.110
around these stats that's fine but to
00:21:10.120 --> 00:21:11.909
get the very first one that's kind of
00:21:11.919 --> 00:21:14.909
cool and that's a planet that is
00:21:14.919 --> 00:21:16.310
significantly more massive than the
00:21:16.320 --> 00:21:18.470
earth that star probably has other
00:21:18.480 --> 00:21:20.230
planets where you find one planet there
00:21:20.240 --> 00:21:22.750
will be more so this is a planetary
00:21:22.760 --> 00:21:25.029
system that is on a oneway ticket out of
00:21:25.039 --> 00:21:28.789
our galaxy never to return wow yeah
00:21:28.799 --> 00:21:31.070
that's quite a find isn't it and such an
00:21:31.080 --> 00:21:34.390
incredible speed have they worked out
00:21:34.400 --> 00:21:36.750
how long it will take to exit the Galaxy
00:21:36.760 --> 00:21:38.909
probably a long time even at that speed
00:21:38.919 --> 00:21:40.750
very very long time even at that speed
00:21:40.760 --> 00:21:43.149
so we can probably try and back of the
00:21:43.159 --> 00:21:45.390
envelope mental arithmetic list so I
00:21:45.400 --> 00:21:47.390
I'll for get everybody on line to
00:21:47.400 --> 00:21:50.190
forgive me but speed of light is 300,000
00:21:50.200 --> 00:21:52.909
kmers a second y I'm going to say that
00:21:52.919 --> 00:21:55.149
this is 600 km a second that just keeps
00:21:55.159 --> 00:21:58.029
the maths easier right yeah um 600 over
00:21:58.039 --> 00:22:02.230
300 th000 is 6 over 300 which is 2%
00:22:02.240 --> 00:22:04.310
thereabouts so this thing's traveling at
00:22:04.320 --> 00:22:06.029
2% of the speed of
00:22:06.039 --> 00:22:08.750
light that's fairly significant now the
00:22:08.760 --> 00:22:10.029
Galax is going to be pulling it back and
00:22:10.039 --> 00:22:12.630
SL it down as it goes but if you think
00:22:12.640 --> 00:22:14.230
about the diameter of the Milky Way is
00:22:14.240 --> 00:22:16.950
about a 100,000 light years so that
00:22:16.960 --> 00:22:18.390
means the radius of the Milky Way is
00:22:18.400 --> 00:22:20.990
about 50,000 light years if you're
00:22:21.000 --> 00:22:23.230
traveling at 2% of the speed of light
00:22:23.240 --> 00:22:25.190
that means it will take you 50 years to
00:22:25.200 --> 00:22:29.029
travel one light year right right so 50
00:22:29.039 --> 00:22:31.990
years per Lightyear for 50,000 light
00:22:32.000 --> 00:22:36.110
years is 2.5 million years okay now that
00:22:36.120 --> 00:22:39.750
is a long time for us but we compare it
00:22:39.760 --> 00:22:42.470
to the fact that it takes us some 250
00:22:42.480 --> 00:22:43.950
million years also to go around the
00:22:43.960 --> 00:22:45.909
middle of the Galaxy that gives you a
00:22:45.919 --> 00:22:48.390
sense of how quickness is actually
00:22:48.400 --> 00:22:51.830
moving fascinating all right uh yeah so
00:22:51.840 --> 00:22:54.470
far the fastest found but there may be
00:22:54.480 --> 00:22:56.630
others will probably find another one
00:22:56.640 --> 00:22:59.110
that's faster at some stage yes uh you
00:22:59.120 --> 00:23:00.789
can read about that at space.com or if
00:23:00.799 --> 00:23:03.190
you want to read the actual paper uh it
00:23:03.200 --> 00:23:04.789
was published this month in the
00:23:04.799 --> 00:23:07.789
astronomical Journal this is Space Nuts
00:23:07.799 --> 00:23:12.149
with Andrew Dunley and Professor jonty
00:23:12.159 --> 00:23:14.870
Horner okay we checked all four
00:23:14.880 --> 00:23:18.549
systems Space Nuts now johy let's move
00:23:18.559 --> 00:23:22.390
on to this problem with um dandruff in
00:23:22.400 --> 00:23:24.710
space that's what it's described as it's
00:23:24.720 --> 00:23:26.990
not really dandruff it's just uh
00:23:27.000 --> 00:23:29.990
neighboring uh systems dumping their
00:23:30.000 --> 00:23:32.870
stuff on us absolutely I I didn't know
00:23:32.880 --> 00:23:35.190
that was a thing Amber doing exactly the
00:23:35.200 --> 00:23:37.830
same back of Li should have said no ask
00:23:37.840 --> 00:23:39.870
one of those things that I talk about a
00:23:39.880 --> 00:23:41.669
lot in the context of our solar system
00:23:41.679 --> 00:23:44.269
we have comets and asteroids and the
00:23:44.279 --> 00:23:46.190
main way that comets get removed from
00:23:46.200 --> 00:23:47.909
the solar system to no longer pose a
00:23:47.919 --> 00:23:50.230
threat to the Earth is that many of them
00:23:50.240 --> 00:23:52.510
escate the solar system never to return
00:23:52.520 --> 00:23:53.990
usually flung out by one of the giant
00:23:54.000 --> 00:23:56.190
planets or by subtle gravitational
00:23:56.200 --> 00:23:58.830
perturbations like that so you can look
00:23:58.840 --> 00:24:00.269
back over the edge of the solar system
00:24:00.279 --> 00:24:01.870
and it has continually been shedding
00:24:01.880 --> 00:24:03.909
comets and asteroids into the void of
00:24:03.919 --> 00:24:06.430
space creating these Interstellar
00:24:06.440 --> 00:24:08.830
wonders essentially and that would have
00:24:08.840 --> 00:24:10.390
been particularly strongly the case
00:24:10.400 --> 00:24:12.390
incidentally when the solar system was
00:24:12.400 --> 00:24:13.909
still forming because big part of the
00:24:13.919 --> 00:24:15.669
formation of the planets in the cleanup
00:24:15.679 --> 00:24:17.669
afterwards was getting rid of most of
00:24:17.679 --> 00:24:19.830
the stuff that was left over so the
00:24:19.840 --> 00:24:21.590
solar system over it time will have shed
00:24:21.600 --> 00:24:24.350
uncounted objects into space and it
00:24:24.360 --> 00:24:27.149
continues to do so today and I've often
00:24:27.159 --> 00:24:29.230
said in those thoughts it's almost
00:24:29.240 --> 00:24:30.870
certain that every other star will be
00:24:30.880 --> 00:24:32.389
doing the same thing but any star that
00:24:32.399 --> 00:24:34.950
has a planet syst those planets will be
00:24:34.960 --> 00:24:36.470
stirring things up and throwing things
00:24:36.480 --> 00:24:38.950
out so it's one of those things I've
00:24:38.960 --> 00:24:40.669
just taken for granted but it's only
00:24:40.679 --> 00:24:43.029
recently that we've actually been able
00:24:43.039 --> 00:24:45.269
to detect the products of this from
00:24:45.279 --> 00:24:47.950
other stars like I said for decades
00:24:47.960 --> 00:24:49.430
people have talked about the possibility
00:24:49.440 --> 00:24:51.310
of us finding Interstellar objects in
00:24:51.320 --> 00:24:53.549
the solar system so I've seen comets or
00:24:53.559 --> 00:24:56.630
astroids coming through that could be
00:24:56.640 --> 00:24:59.230
absolutely and definitively not to have
00:24:59.240 --> 00:25:01.750
an origin in our solar system how do we
00:25:01.760 --> 00:25:02.950
do that well we look at how quick
00:25:02.960 --> 00:25:04.149
they're moving it's just like what we
00:25:04.159 --> 00:25:05.549
were talking about a minute ago with the
00:25:05.559 --> 00:25:08.110
escape Velocity objects moving around
00:25:08.120 --> 00:25:11.430
the Sun are gravitationally bound if
00:25:11.440 --> 00:25:12.669
they get a nudge and they're going to
00:25:12.679 --> 00:25:14.510
escape they will be traveling a bit too
00:25:14.520 --> 00:25:16.110
quick to be gravitationally bound but
00:25:16.120 --> 00:25:20.230
only just by a tiny amount so when we
00:25:20.240 --> 00:25:22.669
find an object that comes in we can work
00:25:22.679 --> 00:25:25.310
out what speed it would travel at if it
00:25:25.320 --> 00:25:28.190
was infinitely far from the Sun call
00:25:28.200 --> 00:25:29.950
this the velocity of infinity so once
00:25:29.960 --> 00:25:31.630
the sun has slowed it down as much as it
00:25:31.640 --> 00:25:35.110
can how much speed has it got left and
00:25:35.120 --> 00:25:37.669
two objects that were found in the last
00:25:37.679 --> 00:25:39.830
decade met this criteria of being
00:25:39.840 --> 00:25:42.470
Interstellar they were umu which came
00:25:42.480 --> 00:25:44.549
through in 2017 and despite what a
00:25:44.559 --> 00:25:47.470
certain eminent um person at Harvard and
00:25:47.480 --> 00:25:48.909
I'm trying to choose my words carefully
00:25:48.919 --> 00:25:50.830
here because I have a certain opinion um
00:25:50.840 --> 00:25:52.950
despite what he keeps trying to tell you
00:25:52.960 --> 00:25:54.310
to sell his books and make a lot of
00:25:54.320 --> 00:25:56.389
money that was not an alien spaceship it
00:25:56.399 --> 00:25:58.310
never would be an alien spaceship it
00:25:58.320 --> 00:26:00.909
absolutely was not aliens that was just
00:26:00.919 --> 00:26:04.070
a lump of rock and debris we then had
00:26:04.080 --> 00:26:06.630
comic borisov back in 2019 which was our
00:26:06.640 --> 00:26:09.269
second Interstellar object yeah we found
00:26:09.279 --> 00:26:10.909
two of them now the odds are that in the
00:26:10.919 --> 00:26:12.950
coming decade we will find hundreds
00:26:12.960 --> 00:26:14.669
because the Vera Rubin observatories are
00:26:14.679 --> 00:26:17.070
going to come online ver ruin
00:26:17.080 --> 00:26:18.549
Observatory of course named for one of
00:26:18.559 --> 00:26:21.230
the great astronomers of 20th century
00:26:21.240 --> 00:26:24.230
who was a woman in astronomy and that's
00:26:24.240 --> 00:26:25.750
a challenging thing to discuss at the
00:26:25.760 --> 00:26:27.350
moment with what's going on in the US I
00:26:27.360 --> 00:26:29.110
will just mention in passing that that
00:26:29.120 --> 00:26:31.789
is itself a controversy this week
00:26:31.799 --> 00:26:33.430
because with the new government in the
00:26:33.440 --> 00:26:35.590
US they've been forced to change the
00:26:35.600 --> 00:26:39.389
biography of Vera Rubin on the website
00:26:39.399 --> 00:26:40.750
because one of the things that she was
00:26:40.760 --> 00:26:42.430
very active on was advocating for women
00:26:42.440 --> 00:26:44.389
in science and you know setting up
00:26:44.399 --> 00:26:45.830
schemes to try and help women get more
00:26:45.840 --> 00:26:47.430
involved in astronomy and now you can't
00:26:47.440 --> 00:26:49.750
talk about that anyway that that's an
00:26:49.760 --> 00:26:51.750
aside but it's a bit of a frustration of
00:26:51.760 --> 00:26:53.950
the human element of this yeah but ver
00:26:53.960 --> 00:26:55.909
Rubin Observatory named after this
00:26:55.919 --> 00:26:57.710
incredible astronomer is going to come
00:26:57.720 --> 00:26:59.669
online in the next year or two and is
00:26:59.679 --> 00:27:01.789
forast to find tens or hundreds of these
00:27:01.799 --> 00:27:03.269
objects because we'll just be much
00:27:03.279 --> 00:27:06.269
better at spotting them what the new
00:27:06.279 --> 00:27:08.789
research is is some computer modeling a
00:27:08.799 --> 00:27:10.430
group has had this same idea that we're
00:27:10.440 --> 00:27:12.190
just talking about and said let's model
00:27:12.200 --> 00:27:14.430
this let's try and get a handle on just
00:27:14.440 --> 00:27:17.510
how much stuff May by star systems are
00:27:17.520 --> 00:27:19.750
throwing our way to fill the space
00:27:19.760 --> 00:27:23.070
around us and they looked at our nearest
00:27:23.080 --> 00:27:25.190
companions the alpha centor system which
00:27:25.200 --> 00:27:27.830
is the binary SAR of alpha centor a andb
00:27:27.840 --> 00:27:29.710
and then the Red Dwarf Proxima which is
00:27:29.720 --> 00:27:31.190
currently a bit closer towards of the
00:27:31.200 --> 00:27:32.430
two bigger
00:27:32.440 --> 00:27:34.909
stars there run some simulations very
00:27:34.919 --> 00:27:36.830
much of the ilk that I do in my D job
00:27:36.840 --> 00:27:39.230
running on the superc Computing cluster
00:27:39.240 --> 00:27:43.350
here saying if this star system has the
00:27:43.360 --> 00:27:44.870
kind of objects in it we'd expect for
00:27:44.880 --> 00:27:47.509
system of that age how many are getting
00:27:47.519 --> 00:27:49.190
ejected in our general direction and
00:27:49.200 --> 00:27:51.470
what they have found is that their
00:27:51.480 --> 00:27:53.389
simulation suggests there could be as
00:27:53.399 --> 00:27:55.830
many as a million objects bigger than
00:27:55.840 --> 00:27:58.630
100 meters across passing through our
00:27:58.640 --> 00:28:01.990
solar system at the current time that
00:28:02.000 --> 00:28:03.830
departed from the alpha centor system
00:28:03.840 --> 00:28:06.710
now the cirley here is a lot of the time
00:28:06.720 --> 00:28:08.470
when we talk about passing through the
00:28:08.480 --> 00:28:10.230
solar system we think of our local part
00:28:10.240 --> 00:28:11.750
of the solar system the orbits of the
00:28:11.760 --> 00:28:13.990
planets but in reality the volume of
00:28:14.000 --> 00:28:15.509
space we're considering to be the solar
00:28:15.519 --> 00:28:17.950
system here is the entirety of the out
00:28:17.960 --> 00:28:20.269
Cloud so this is a volume of space
00:28:20.279 --> 00:28:22.590
something like two light years in every
00:28:22.600 --> 00:28:24.509
direction from it so it's an
00:28:24.519 --> 00:28:27.789
unimaginably vast sphere of space that
00:28:27.799 --> 00:28:30.029
has these objects passing through it so
00:28:30.039 --> 00:28:31.669
the likelihood of one getting closer to
00:28:31.679 --> 00:28:33.350
first to detect in the near future is
00:28:33.360 --> 00:28:35.710
pretty low but it's not be on the
00:28:35.720 --> 00:28:37.710
balance of possibility and again when
00:28:37.720 --> 00:28:41.230
Vera Rubin comes online if any of these
00:28:41.240 --> 00:28:43.389
are in you know the domain of the
00:28:43.399 --> 00:28:44.789
planets they're coming close enough to
00:28:44.799 --> 00:28:47.830
the Sun that they are detectable ver
00:28:47.840 --> 00:28:51.669
Rubin will find them now a million
00:28:51.679 --> 00:28:53.269
objects spread over the out Cloud to be
00:28:53.279 --> 00:28:55.149
honest means that it's very unlikely one
00:28:55.159 --> 00:28:57.190
of them will be close enough to see but
00:28:57.200 --> 00:28:58.789
these things are going to be TR faster
00:28:58.799 --> 00:29:01.509
than the escape velocity of the Sun so
00:29:01.519 --> 00:29:03.630
they'll come through fairly quickly and
00:29:03.640 --> 00:29:04.950
that means if they're moving through
00:29:04.960 --> 00:29:06.350
just because we don't see them M doesn't
00:29:06.360 --> 00:29:07.909
mean if we look again in 5 years time
00:29:07.919 --> 00:29:09.870
there wouldn't be one that's appeared
00:29:09.880 --> 00:29:11.710
the other thing that came out of this is
00:29:11.720 --> 00:29:13.110
that they talked about the smaller
00:29:13.120 --> 00:29:15.389
particles are more common and it's quite
00:29:15.399 --> 00:29:17.070
likely that there may be as many as 10
00:29:17.080 --> 00:29:20.110
meteors per year on the earth that are
00:29:20.120 --> 00:29:21.750
bits of dust from the alpha centor
00:29:21.760 --> 00:29:24.430
system hitting our planet now 10 per
00:29:24.440 --> 00:29:26.190
year across the entire surface of the
00:29:26.200 --> 00:29:27.870
Earth means you're very unlikely to find
00:29:27.880 --> 00:29:28.710
them
00:29:28.720 --> 00:29:30.590
but it reminded me of stories that go
00:29:30.600 --> 00:29:32.230
back much further because we have these
00:29:32.240 --> 00:29:34.110
wonderful networks of cameras across the
00:29:34.120 --> 00:29:37.710
Earth that look up at shooting s and try
00:29:37.720 --> 00:29:39.909
and get multi-session observations so
00:29:39.919 --> 00:29:41.630
you can do trigonometry and figure out
00:29:41.640 --> 00:29:42.990
what their orbit was how they were
00:29:43.000 --> 00:29:45.110
moving and they've detected over the
00:29:45.120 --> 00:29:46.549
years a very small number of
00:29:46.559 --> 00:29:49.310
definitively interstellar meteors so
00:29:49.320 --> 00:29:51.070
meteors coming into the Earth atmosphere
00:29:51.080 --> 00:29:52.830
with a speed significantly higher than
00:29:52.840 --> 00:29:55.710
72 km a second which means that they
00:29:55.720 --> 00:29:57.190
can't have been bound to the solar
00:29:57.200 --> 00:29:58.870
system
00:29:58.880 --> 00:30:00.590
one of the things that those papers
00:30:00.600 --> 00:30:02.029
discussed for a long time is that there
00:30:02.039 --> 00:30:04.470
is one dominant source of dust through
00:30:04.480 --> 00:30:06.750
our solar system that gives us more than
00:30:06.760 --> 00:30:09.990
all of sources combined it's famous star
00:30:10.000 --> 00:30:11.190
called beta
00:30:11.200 --> 00:30:14.070
pictoris which back in 1983 was one of
00:30:14.080 --> 00:30:16.149
three stars the infrared astronomical
00:30:16.159 --> 00:30:18.430
satellite was confused about because it
00:30:18.440 --> 00:30:20.190
found an infrared excess around that
00:30:20.200 --> 00:30:22.950
star soory light years away it's more
00:30:22.960 --> 00:30:24.509
massive than the Sun and hotton but it's
00:30:24.519 --> 00:30:26.549
very young and it's still got a disc of
00:30:26.559 --> 00:30:28.590
debris around it forming planets it's
00:30:28.600 --> 00:30:30.310
got planets in that disc that we've
00:30:30.320 --> 00:30:32.389
discovered but that incredibly active
00:30:32.399 --> 00:30:34.269
Stellar Wind that that massive star has
00:30:34.279 --> 00:30:36.630
is blowing lots of the Dust into Space
00:30:36.640 --> 00:30:38.190
streaming off in all
00:30:38.200 --> 00:30:41.269
directions and enough of that dust is
00:30:41.279 --> 00:30:44.630
traveling to reach us 63 light years
00:30:44.640 --> 00:30:47.110
away that we can detect that as a
00:30:47.120 --> 00:30:50.110
distinct source of debris crashing into
00:30:50.120 --> 00:30:52.630
the Earth atmosphere that really boggles
00:30:52.640 --> 00:30:55.070
my mind that a star that far away can be
00:30:55.080 --> 00:30:57.470
putting dust into our atmosphere at a
00:30:57.480 --> 00:30:59.430
sufficient level that people have
00:30:59.440 --> 00:31:02.549
detected that dust stre yeah it is it's
00:31:02.559 --> 00:31:05.029
amazing and this must be happening just
00:31:05.039 --> 00:31:07.470
about everywhere we we we've probably
00:31:07.480 --> 00:31:11.070
got systems exchanging junk constantly
00:31:11.080 --> 00:31:13.669
yeah absolutely and it it ties into the
00:31:13.679 --> 00:31:15.629
panspermia idea that we've talked about
00:31:15.639 --> 00:31:17.750
before as well yeah if you are
00:31:17.760 --> 00:31:19.590
constantly ejecting dust and debris from
00:31:19.600 --> 00:31:22.070
every planetary system if you have
00:31:22.080 --> 00:31:24.470
somewhere with life in that system
00:31:24.480 --> 00:31:27.230
eventually that life has the potential
00:31:27.240 --> 00:31:28.789
to travel
00:31:28.799 --> 00:31:31.190
and you know yeah most of it will most
00:31:31.200 --> 00:31:32.629
of the debris ejected from the earth
00:31:32.639 --> 00:31:34.590
Will Never Land on any other world it'll
00:31:34.600 --> 00:31:36.909
just float in space for forever more but
00:31:36.919 --> 00:31:40.230
enough has been ejected that eventually
00:31:40.240 --> 00:31:41.710
something ejected from the earth will
00:31:41.720 --> 00:31:44.310
land on a planet around another s or
00:31:44.320 --> 00:31:46.230
will be incorporated in a planet forming
00:31:46.240 --> 00:31:47.990
region around the S that's just being
00:31:48.000 --> 00:31:50.750
bought you put enough material out there
00:31:50.760 --> 00:31:53.070
with enough bacteria buried in it it's
00:31:53.080 --> 00:31:54.990
very reasonable to imagine that you
00:31:55.000 --> 00:31:57.230
could get a situation where some point
00:31:57.240 --> 00:31:59.029
in the distant future there is a planet
00:31:59.039 --> 00:32:01.310
that has life on it and that life is
00:32:01.320 --> 00:32:02.789
having the discussion of how did life
00:32:02.799 --> 00:32:04.710
get started and someone suggest well
00:32:04.720 --> 00:32:06.230
maybe life came from the stars and
00:32:06.240 --> 00:32:07.430
everybody says well that's a lot of
00:32:07.440 --> 00:32:09.629
rubbish stop watching Star Trek and
00:32:09.639 --> 00:32:12.110
after was URS because it's Earth life
00:32:12.120 --> 00:32:14.950
yes indeed and this story also proves
00:32:14.960 --> 00:32:16.070
that you shouldn't get upset with your
00:32:16.080 --> 00:32:17.870
neighbors for throwing the grass
00:32:17.880 --> 00:32:20.669
clippings over your fence because it
00:32:20.679 --> 00:32:23.070
happens right through the cosmos
00:32:23.080 --> 00:32:24.710
absolutely I mean ties into the other
00:32:24.720 --> 00:32:27.070
space andruff thing actually so this is
00:32:27.080 --> 00:32:28.870
the the whole connection here of course
00:32:28.880 --> 00:32:30.310
is the Stars shaking their head and
00:32:30.320 --> 00:32:32.029
comets flying through space essentially
00:32:32.039 --> 00:32:34.310
the beautiful analogy there but anytime
00:32:34.320 --> 00:32:36.669
you're walking around outside or anytime
00:32:36.679 --> 00:32:38.230
you're doing the dusting in your house a
00:32:38.240 --> 00:32:39.549
certain amount of the dust that is
00:32:39.559 --> 00:32:41.629
falling on your shoulders or there is a
00:32:41.639 --> 00:32:44.070
crewing in your house is dust from
00:32:44.080 --> 00:32:46.389
outter space we have these tiny little
00:32:46.399 --> 00:32:48.070
particles of dust which are sometimes
00:32:48.080 --> 00:32:50.750
called brownly particles they are small
00:32:50.760 --> 00:32:52.389
enough that they are slowed down by the
00:32:52.399 --> 00:32:54.870
very tenous outer atmosphere before they
00:32:54.880 --> 00:32:56.029
get into a thick enough layer of
00:32:56.039 --> 00:32:58.310
atmosphere that they get a bled before
00:32:58.320 --> 00:33:00.430
they burn up so there's this steady
00:33:00.440 --> 00:33:03.310
little SLE of micro micro microscopic
00:33:03.320 --> 00:33:05.230
dust particles from space running down
00:33:05.240 --> 00:33:07.470
on the Earth all the time so when you do
00:33:07.480 --> 00:33:09.990
the dusting or when you go outside on a
00:33:10.000 --> 00:33:12.149
on a day and you're getting dust on you
00:33:12.159 --> 00:33:14.190
a tiny fraction of that is space so
00:33:14.200 --> 00:33:15.870
you've got space and refraining down on
00:33:15.880 --> 00:33:18.710
you at all times yeah it is fascinating
00:33:18.720 --> 00:33:21.029
to think about uh I think we have
00:33:21.039 --> 00:33:22.830
touched on that story once before a
00:33:22.840 --> 00:33:25.070
while ago but uh yeah
00:33:25.080 --> 00:33:27.870
fascinating um I think if we're quick we
00:33:27.880 --> 00:33:30.190
can squeeze in one more little story if
00:33:30.200 --> 00:33:32.230
you want to chase up the Space dandr
00:33:32.240 --> 00:33:35.470
story livescience.com uh carries that
00:33:35.480 --> 00:33:39.990
one uh one last yarn and this one is
00:33:40.000 --> 00:33:42.029
something we um I think we touched on in
00:33:42.039 --> 00:33:43.430
the last couple of weeks about you know
00:33:43.440 --> 00:33:45.350
where does a planet store start and a
00:33:45.360 --> 00:33:49.110
brown dwarf begin and we talked about 13
00:33:49.120 --> 00:33:52.950
um Jupiter masses uh well now a new
00:33:52.960 --> 00:33:56.310
planet has popped up in a study that has
00:33:56.320 --> 00:33:59.669
sparked debate on that issue yes so what
00:33:59.679 --> 00:34:01.870
we tend to do as humans in all walks of
00:34:01.880 --> 00:34:04.430
life is try and understand the universe
00:34:04.440 --> 00:34:06.110
that's just very fundamentally human
00:34:06.120 --> 00:34:08.270
thing to do and to do that we break
00:34:08.280 --> 00:34:10.710
things that are continual up into
00:34:10.720 --> 00:34:13.470
discrete packets into discrete fractions
00:34:13.480 --> 00:34:15.149
and we do this with a human lifetime you
00:34:15.159 --> 00:34:17.109
know you grow up and then suddenly one
00:34:17.119 --> 00:34:18.629
magical morning you wake up and you're
00:34:18.639 --> 00:34:20.829
legally able to drive or you're legally
00:34:20.839 --> 00:34:22.349
able to drink so long as you're not
00:34:22.359 --> 00:34:24.270
driving you know you have these magical
00:34:24.280 --> 00:34:26.149
thresholds where we've said one day
00:34:26.159 --> 00:34:28.270
you're an adult the day before you were
00:34:28.280 --> 00:34:30.310
a child you're not fundamentally any
00:34:30.320 --> 00:34:32.149
different across that barrier but we're
00:34:32.159 --> 00:34:33.829
grouping like with like and keeping
00:34:33.839 --> 00:34:35.389
different things
00:34:35.399 --> 00:34:37.230
separated that's what's happened with
00:34:37.240 --> 00:34:38.829
definitions of planets you know this was
00:34:38.839 --> 00:34:41.470
all the rage all the controversy two
00:34:41.480 --> 00:34:43.389
decades ago with the demotion of Pluto
00:34:43.399 --> 00:34:45.389
it was a same thing it was trying to
00:34:45.399 --> 00:34:46.990
group objects that are similar with each
00:34:47.000 --> 00:34:49.589
other in groups so that you can study
00:34:49.599 --> 00:34:52.069
that and one of the great areas where
00:34:52.079 --> 00:34:54.829
this has happened is you've got planets
00:34:54.839 --> 00:34:56.669
you've got stars and in between them
00:34:56.679 --> 00:34:58.230
you've got these curious objects that
00:34:58.240 --> 00:35:00.550
people call Brown dwarfs which are
00:35:00.560 --> 00:35:02.109
things that they viewed as being too big
00:35:02.119 --> 00:35:03.630
and too massive to be considered a
00:35:03.640 --> 00:35:05.910
typical Planet but they're not massive
00:35:05.920 --> 00:35:07.750
enough to have hydrogen fusion and to
00:35:07.760 --> 00:35:10.030
shine and become a sar so the boundary
00:35:10.040 --> 00:35:11.870
to be a sar is fairly clear upup if you
00:35:11.880 --> 00:35:14.829
get hydrogen Fusion going you're a sar
00:35:14.839 --> 00:35:16.710
which leads to the slightly quirky thing
00:35:16.720 --> 00:35:19.589
that white dwarfs and neutron stars are
00:35:19.599 --> 00:35:21.870
not Stars they're cell remnants so
00:35:21.880 --> 00:35:24.790
they're dead stars which is a turle
00:35:24.800 --> 00:35:28.030
asite but between a planet and a star
00:35:28.040 --> 00:35:29.390
there's this domain where you are not
00:35:29.400 --> 00:35:31.829
massive enough to burn hydrogen but the
00:35:31.839 --> 00:35:33.390
temperature in your core will get high
00:35:33.400 --> 00:35:34.870
enough that you will temporarily be able
00:35:34.880 --> 00:35:37.030
to burn deuterium which is heavy
00:35:37.040 --> 00:35:39.030
hydrogen there's not much of that so
00:35:39.040 --> 00:35:40.790
you'll get a very short period of dyum
00:35:40.800 --> 00:35:42.230
burning and then you'll just fizzle out
00:35:42.240 --> 00:35:44.030
and be a little glowing
00:35:44.040 --> 00:35:47.630
Ember now where that boundary is with
00:35:47.640 --> 00:35:49.470
the star is very clearcut it's a
00:35:49.480 --> 00:35:50.910
hydrogen fusion and it's a very
00:35:50.920 --> 00:35:53.030
observable thing but the boundary at the
00:35:53.040 --> 00:35:55.109
lower end where you no longer have
00:35:55.119 --> 00:35:57.790
enough Mass to burn the uteran is much
00:35:57.800 --> 00:36:00.390
woer and if people do modeling it
00:36:00.400 --> 00:36:02.270
depends on the composition of the object
00:36:02.280 --> 00:36:04.190
and how much solid material it's got and
00:36:04.200 --> 00:36:06.270
how much uterum it's got and all sorts
00:36:06.280 --> 00:36:09.069
of things going on so what's happened
00:36:09.079 --> 00:36:10.550
historically because we didn't really
00:36:10.560 --> 00:36:11.990
have the capacity to find low mass
00:36:12.000 --> 00:36:13.190
objects is people just put this
00:36:13.200 --> 00:36:15.790
arbitrary boundary of 13 Jupiter masses
00:36:15.800 --> 00:36:18.390
there to say anything more massive than
00:36:18.400 --> 00:36:20.430
that is a brown wolf anything less
00:36:20.440 --> 00:36:23.030
massive is a planet so that is setting
00:36:23.040 --> 00:36:25.230
this boundary purely on the physical
00:36:25.240 --> 00:36:27.630
Mass it's taking no account of the
00:36:27.640 --> 00:36:29.069
composition of the object or how it
00:36:29.079 --> 00:36:31.390
formed and as we finally got the ability
00:36:31.400 --> 00:36:32.950
to find objects in this Mass people have
00:36:32.960 --> 00:36:36.069
started to question that because the
00:36:36.079 --> 00:36:37.750
formation mechanism the composition
00:36:37.760 --> 00:36:39.670
matters a planet like Jupiter has about
00:36:39.680 --> 00:36:41.910
30 Earth masses of solid material as a
00:36:41.920 --> 00:36:45.910
core because of the way it formed a star
00:36:45.920 --> 00:36:48.910
doesn't have that same kind of structure
00:36:48.920 --> 00:36:50.870
so there's a growing argument that maybe
00:36:50.880 --> 00:36:53.190
we should divide it by formation
00:36:53.200 --> 00:36:55.270
mechanism and something that formed like
00:36:55.280 --> 00:36:57.069
a planet is a planet even if it's more
00:36:57.079 --> 00:36:59.030
massive than risk limit and it probably
00:36:59.040 --> 00:37:00.750
wouldn't undergo utaran fusion because a
00:37:00.760 --> 00:37:03.270
lot of the mass is solid material so
00:37:03.280 --> 00:37:06.030
it's got less utaran alternatively if it
00:37:06.040 --> 00:37:08.270
Formed like a star even if it's less
00:37:08.280 --> 00:37:10.950
massive than 13 juk to masses maybe it
00:37:10.960 --> 00:37:12.790
should be considered a brand W rather
00:37:12.800 --> 00:37:14.230
than a planet because of the formation
00:37:14.240 --> 00:37:16.470
mechanism and it's a debate that's only
00:37:16.480 --> 00:37:17.710
just starting to kick off because we're
00:37:17.720 --> 00:37:19.550
only really able to find these objects
00:37:19.560 --> 00:37:22.150
now it's being fired up here by the
00:37:22.160 --> 00:37:24.710
discovery of what's known as Gia 4B so
00:37:24.720 --> 00:37:26.190
the guy spacecraft we talked about
00:37:26.200 --> 00:37:28.069
earlier is this incredible miss that was
00:37:28.079 --> 00:37:29.829
measuring the positions and the Motions
00:37:29.839 --> 00:37:32.870
of a billion stars with Incredible
00:37:32.880 --> 00:37:35.230
Precision two billion stars absolutely
00:37:35.240 --> 00:37:37.670
ridiculous and what guia has promised
00:37:37.680 --> 00:37:39.910
for a long time is that it would find
00:37:39.920 --> 00:37:42.030
100,000 to a million planets under the
00:37:42.040 --> 00:37:45.030
stars that was part of the marketing so
00:37:45.040 --> 00:37:48.230
far it has found four or five um more
00:37:48.240 --> 00:37:49.470
will come because they're still doing
00:37:49.480 --> 00:37:51.309
their big de list so it will give us a
00:37:51.319 --> 00:37:53.870
deluge of planets at some point but the
00:37:53.880 --> 00:37:55.710
reason it can do this is that it
00:37:55.720 --> 00:37:57.710
measures the positions of the Stars the
00:37:57.720 --> 00:38:00.150
sky so accurately that it can see them
00:38:00.160 --> 00:38:02.950
wobbling as they move as a result of the
00:38:02.960 --> 00:38:05.870
planets pulling them around so this is a
00:38:05.880 --> 00:38:07.470
counterpart to our radial velocity
00:38:07.480 --> 00:38:09.790
method radial velocity sees a movement
00:38:09.800 --> 00:38:12.109
back and forth on a line of sight Gia
00:38:12.119 --> 00:38:14.309
sees the movement at right angles to
00:38:14.319 --> 00:38:17.230
that so it's been looking at this star
00:38:17.240 --> 00:38:19.270
this star is less massive than the sun
00:38:19.280 --> 00:38:21.510
about 2third of the mass of the Sun and
00:38:21.520 --> 00:38:23.109
this star is moving across the night sky
00:38:23.119 --> 00:38:24.589
because it's moving through the Galaxy
00:38:24.599 --> 00:38:26.589
separately to us it's what what we call
00:38:26.599 --> 00:38:28.790
proper motion and guy has identified
00:38:28.800 --> 00:38:29.910
that instead of that proper motion
00:38:29.920 --> 00:38:31.589
ministra line it's following a Corp
00:38:31.599 --> 00:38:34.750
group path across the sky zigzagging and
00:38:34.760 --> 00:38:36.550
that's a Telltale sign it's got a planet
00:38:36.560 --> 00:38:39.470
going around it now because this Stars a
00:38:39.480 --> 00:38:41.550
bit like the sun it's a bit cooler you
00:38:41.560 --> 00:38:43.790
can do radio velocity observations which
00:38:43.800 --> 00:38:45.390
means you can measure the line of sight
00:38:45.400 --> 00:38:47.589
wobble as well which means you can
00:38:47.599 --> 00:38:49.309
perfectly constrain what's going around
00:38:49.319 --> 00:38:51.829
it and the evidence here is that this is
00:38:51.839 --> 00:38:55.630
an object 11.8 times the mass of Jupiter
00:38:55.640 --> 00:38:57.230
so it's just underneath that threshold
00:38:57.240 --> 00:38:58.430
to be a brown dwarf we would
00:38:58.440 --> 00:39:00.630
traditionally call it a planet yeah and
00:39:00.640 --> 00:39:03.430
job on the complexity comes out that
00:39:03.440 --> 00:39:05.750
this SAR is less massive than the Sun
00:39:05.760 --> 00:39:07.470
and it's got a roughly similar
00:39:07.480 --> 00:39:10.030
composition to the Sun what that means
00:39:10.040 --> 00:39:12.589
is the pl material the planets around it
00:39:12.599 --> 00:39:14.829
would have formed from would have been
00:39:14.839 --> 00:39:17.150
similar to that around the sun it's not
00:39:17.160 --> 00:39:18.710
particularly metal Rich so it wouldn't
00:39:18.720 --> 00:39:20.670
have had far more solid material around
00:39:20.680 --> 00:39:22.870
it than the sun did which means there's
00:39:22.880 --> 00:39:24.710
a really difficult question to answer
00:39:24.720 --> 00:39:26.470
which is how can a sty less massive than
00:39:26.480 --> 00:39:28.870
the Sun which presumably forms from a
00:39:28.880 --> 00:39:30.589
less massive cloud of material than the
00:39:30.599 --> 00:39:33.309
sun how can it form a planet 12 times
00:39:33.319 --> 00:39:34.990
more massive than the biggest planet we
00:39:35.000 --> 00:39:37.750
have in our system that just doesn't
00:39:37.760 --> 00:39:40.069
make much sense it's really counter to
00:39:40.079 --> 00:39:41.630
our planet formation models which is
00:39:41.640 --> 00:39:43.750
more massive stars form more massive
00:39:43.760 --> 00:39:45.870
planets so that then brings up the
00:39:45.880 --> 00:39:47.390
suggestion that maybe this thing didn't
00:39:47.400 --> 00:39:49.990
form as a planet at all maybe instead
00:39:50.000 --> 00:39:51.470
what we're seeing is a failed binary
00:39:51.480 --> 00:39:55.069
star system and this 11.8 Jupiter Mass
00:39:55.079 --> 00:39:57.390
object formed in the same way that
00:39:57.400 --> 00:40:00.790
binary Stars would form that it wasn't
00:40:00.800 --> 00:40:02.309
cor Recreation you didn't get a load of
00:40:02.319 --> 00:40:04.430
solid material grow to 30 times the mass
00:40:04.440 --> 00:40:05.990
of the Earth or 10 times the mass of the
00:40:06.000 --> 00:40:08.150
Earth and then start Gathering gas
00:40:08.160 --> 00:40:10.190
because of the gravitational pole that
00:40:10.200 --> 00:40:11.750
instead it formed through gravitational
00:40:11.760 --> 00:40:13.430
instability in the cloud like another
00:40:13.440 --> 00:40:15.910
star would fall right and therefore this
00:40:15.920 --> 00:40:18.630
could be considered a failed star in
00:40:18.640 --> 00:40:20.870
which case it should be called a brown
00:40:20.880 --> 00:40:22.430
dwarf even though it's not massive
00:40:22.440 --> 00:40:24.309
enough because it didn't form as a
00:40:24.319 --> 00:40:26.750
planet it may even be because it's so
00:40:26.760 --> 00:40:28.190
close to the threshold that it could
00:40:28.200 --> 00:40:29.950
have almost got to the detarium burning
00:40:29.960 --> 00:40:32.390
limit it could have had that happen now
00:40:32.400 --> 00:40:35.190
we don't really know if we could go
00:40:35.200 --> 00:40:37.190
there if we could borrow Captain Kirk's
00:40:37.200 --> 00:40:39.710
spaceship and engage what RAV and go
00:40:39.720 --> 00:40:41.150
there we'd be able to answer this after
00:40:41.160 --> 00:40:42.750
a little while we'd put a mission up
00:40:42.760 --> 00:40:45.109
like Juno that's going around Jupiter
00:40:45.119 --> 00:40:46.829
that would allow you to map the interior
00:40:46.839 --> 00:40:48.349
of the object a bit like the earthquakes
00:40:48.359 --> 00:40:50.430
we were talking about in the first topic
00:40:50.440 --> 00:40:52.190
and figure out if it had a car or not
00:40:52.200 --> 00:40:53.230
and that would tell you about its
00:40:53.240 --> 00:40:55.589
formation but we can't do that we just
00:40:55.599 --> 00:40:57.790
can't get there so at the minute it's
00:40:57.800 --> 00:40:59.550
purely in the domain of speculation but
00:40:59.560 --> 00:41:02.829
it's a sufficiently odd discovery that
00:41:02.839 --> 00:41:04.670
it is just restarting that old
00:41:04.680 --> 00:41:06.910
discussion about at what point do we
00:41:06.920 --> 00:41:08.870
need to look at this again I guess at
00:41:08.880 --> 00:41:11.750
what point do we need to discuss whether
00:41:11.760 --> 00:41:13.950
we get a more physically motivated
00:41:13.960 --> 00:41:15.470
difference between brand woles and
00:41:15.480 --> 00:41:17.430
planets or whether we're happy to
00:41:17.440 --> 00:41:19.670
sticking with this arbitrary Mass limit
00:41:19.680 --> 00:41:21.790
and as the years go on gu is going to
00:41:21.800 --> 00:41:24.190
discover far more objects we continue to
00:41:24.200 --> 00:41:27.390
find planets using all the other methods
00:41:27.400 --> 00:41:29.030
there will be more objects that straddle
00:41:29.040 --> 00:41:30.390
that boundary because nature forms
00:41:30.400 --> 00:41:32.790
things of all sizes it doesn't say I'm
00:41:32.800 --> 00:41:34.510
going to leave a gap here to make it
00:41:34.520 --> 00:41:35.750
nice and easy for you there'll be things
00:41:35.760 --> 00:41:38.069
of all masses and there will be things
00:41:38.079 --> 00:41:39.790
of identical masses that formed in
00:41:39.800 --> 00:41:42.190
different ways and so it's going to be
00:41:42.200 --> 00:41:43.589
an ongoing question I'm sure we could
00:41:43.599 --> 00:41:44.829
have a chat in a couple of years time
00:41:44.839 --> 00:41:46.150
and they'd still be having the same
00:41:46.160 --> 00:41:48.750
debates but it's great when you get to
00:41:48.760 --> 00:41:51.589
the point where our ability to find
00:41:51.599 --> 00:41:53.270
things is such that it pushes the
00:41:53.280 --> 00:41:54.750
boundaries of how we Define things and
00:41:54.760 --> 00:41:56.550
we have to revisit them that's how
00:41:56.560 --> 00:41:58.550
science works and I really love it even
00:41:58.560 --> 00:42:00.309
if it means you get cranky people waving
00:42:00.319 --> 00:42:01.950
flags and going Pluto should still be a
00:42:01.960 --> 00:42:03.870
planet yes yes and that's still
00:42:03.880 --> 00:42:06.109
happening two years oh
00:42:06.119 --> 00:42:08.430
indeed yeah all right uh if you would
00:42:08.440 --> 00:42:13.510
like to um look U look into guia 4B and
00:42:13.520 --> 00:42:16.470
5B they've posted a report in the
00:42:16.480 --> 00:42:18.790
astronomical Journal uh it's a
00:42:18.800 --> 00:42:20.430
fascinating Discovery and I imagine the
00:42:20.440 --> 00:42:22.230
more we look the more unusual things
00:42:22.240 --> 00:42:24.270
we'll find and yes we probably will have
00:42:24.280 --> 00:42:25.069
to
00:42:25.079 --> 00:42:27.829
redefine where a brown War starts and a
00:42:27.839 --> 00:42:29.870
planet finishes in the future it might
00:42:29.880 --> 00:42:32.230
come down to that but uh at the moment
00:42:32.240 --> 00:42:35.549
we just go with what we know until proof
00:42:35.559 --> 00:42:38.230
sends us in a different direction uh we
00:42:38.240 --> 00:42:41.390
are just about done JY thank you so much
00:42:41.400 --> 00:42:42.630
that's absolute pleasure thank you for
00:42:42.640 --> 00:42:44.950
having me always a pleasure and we'll
00:42:44.960 --> 00:42:47.109
see you real soon uh Professor jonty
00:42:47.119 --> 00:42:49.710
horer from the University of Southern
00:42:49.720 --> 00:42:51.829
Queensland and thanks to Hugh in the
00:42:51.839 --> 00:42:53.910
studio who couldn't be with us today
00:42:53.920 --> 00:42:55.870
he's very embarrassed he's got a severe
00:42:55.880 --> 00:42:57.790
case of space dandr
00:42:57.800 --> 00:42:59.710
uh don't forget to visit us online as
00:42:59.720 --> 00:43:02.230
well at SPAC nuts podcast.com or SPAC
00:43:02.240 --> 00:43:04.589
nuts. and from me Andrew Dunley thanks
00:43:04.599 --> 00:43:06.109
for joining us we'll see you on the very
00:43:06.119 --> 00:43:09.829
next episode of space uh Space Nuts
00:43:09.839 --> 00:43:12.950
coming soon until then
00:43:12.960 --> 00:43:15.630
bye-bye you'll be listening to the Space
00:43:15.640 --> 00:43:17.309
Nuts
00:43:17.319 --> 00:43:20.390
podcast available at Apple podcasts
00:43:20.400 --> 00:43:23.390
Spotify iHeart radio or your favorite
00:43:23.400 --> 00:43:25.670
podcast player you can also stream on
00:43:25.680 --> 00:43:27.829
demand at bites.com
00:43:27.839 --> 00:43:29.750
this has been another quality podcast
00:43:29.760 --> 00:43:33.599
production from ss.com