Dark Matter Mysteries, Telescope Innovations & the Quest for Gravitons | SN602 Q&A | Space Nuts:...
Sponsor Link:
This episode of Space Nuts is brought to you by NordVPN . Protect your online privacy with the one we trust - NordVPN . To get our special deal, visit nordvpn.com/spacenuts (https://nordvpn.com/spacenuts) .
And Incogni - i ncogni.com/spacenuts (https://incogni.com/spacenuts)
Exploring Dark Matter, Telescope Innovations, and Olympus Mons
In this engaging Q&A edition of Space Nuts , hosts Andrew Dunkley and Professor Fred Watson tackle a range of fascinating listener questions that dive deep into the mysteries of our universe. From the elusive nature of dark matter to the future of space telescopes, this episode promises to enlighten and entertain.
Episode Highlights:
- The Mystery of Dark Matter: Listener Bob from Chicago asks how astronomers have determined that approximately 80% of the universe is made up of dark matter. Fred explains the historical context and the groundbreaking techniques that have led to this astonishing conclusion.
- Next-Gen Telescopes: Ben also inquires about the next large telescope to be launched. Fred shares his excitement for the Extremely Large Telescope (ELT) in Chile, which promises to revolutionize our understanding of the cosmos with its advanced capabilities.
- Understanding Telescopes: Ash from Australia seeks clarity on the different types of telescopes and the wavelengths they detect. Fred elaborates on the intricate designs of optical, infrared, and radio telescopes, explaining how their unique technologies allow them to observe various forms of light.
- The Graviton Enigma: Russ from the UK poses a thought-provoking question about the graviton and its relation to Einstein's theory of gravity. Fred discusses the complexities of gravity as a force and the ongoing quest to understand its fundamental particles.
- Olympus Mons and Space Elevators: Robert from Iceland wonders if Olympus Mons could serve as a staging point for a space elevator. The hosts explore the challenges and feasibility of this intriguing concept, revealing the importance of location in such ambitious projects.
For more Space Nuts, including our continuously updating newsfeed and to listen to all our episodes, visit our website. (https://www.spacenutspodcast.com/) Follow us on social media at SpaceNutsPod on Facebook, Instagram, and more. We love engaging with our community, so be sure to drop us a message or comment on your favorite platform.
If you’d like to help support Space Nuts and join our growing family of insiders for commercial-free episodes and more, visit spacenutspodcast.com/about (https://www.spacenutspodcast.com/about) .
Stay curious, keep looking up, and join us next time for more stellar insights and cosmic wonders. Until then, clear skies and happy stargazing.
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/space-nuts-astronomy-insights-cosmic-discoveries--2631155/support (https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/space-nuts-astronomy-insights-cosmic-discoveries--2631155/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss) .
Episode link: https://play.headliner.app/episode/31808838?utm_source=youtube
Kind: captions
Language: en
00:00:00.240 --> 00:00:02.070
Hi there. Thanks again for joining us.
00:00:02.080 --> 00:00:04.470
This is Space Nuts, a Q&A edition. This
00:00:04.480 --> 00:00:07.590
is where we answer audience questions.
00:00:07.600 --> 00:00:09.270
Well, we read them out and then we
00:00:09.280 --> 00:00:11.190
pretend we know what we're talking about
00:00:11.200 --> 00:00:13.990
and most people fall for it. They might
00:00:14.000 --> 00:00:15.589
not fall for it today, though, because
00:00:15.599 --> 00:00:17.269
we've got some uh really interesting
00:00:17.279 --> 00:00:20.950
questions about uh a matter of matter
00:00:20.960 --> 00:00:23.830
that we cannot see. Uh does it matter?
00:00:23.840 --> 00:00:26.390
We will find out. Um questions come up
00:00:26.400 --> 00:00:29.109
about gravitons. We're also going to
00:00:29.119 --> 00:00:30.710
answer a question about space
00:00:30.720 --> 00:00:33.030
telescopes. Now, that's right up uh
00:00:33.040 --> 00:00:35.430
Fred's alley. He knows everything there
00:00:35.440 --> 00:00:37.110
is to know about space te. He's written
00:00:37.120 --> 00:00:39.350
books about these things. So, this is
00:00:39.360 --> 00:00:42.310
going to be a good question. And uh a
00:00:42.320 --> 00:00:43.830
question has come up about whether or
00:00:43.840 --> 00:00:46.549
not Olympus Mons might make a good
00:00:46.559 --> 00:00:48.790
staging staging point for a space
00:00:48.800 --> 00:00:51.590
elevator. We will answer all of that on
00:00:51.600 --> 00:00:53.750
this episode of Space Nuts.
00:00:53.760 --> 00:00:58.630
>> 15 seconds. Guidance is internal. 10 9
00:00:58.640 --> 00:01:00.310
ignition sequence start.
00:01:00.320 --> 00:01:01.270
>> Space nuts.
00:01:01.280 --> 00:01:03.750
>> 5 4 3 2
00:01:03.760 --> 00:01:06.230
>> 1 2 3 4 5 5 4 3 2 1
00:01:06.240 --> 00:01:07.350
>> Space nuts.
00:01:07.360 --> 00:01:10.550
>> Astronauts report. It feels good.
00:01:10.560 --> 00:01:13.350
>> And it feels good to have his one and
00:01:13.360 --> 00:01:15.109
only self, Professor Fred Watson, an
00:01:15.119 --> 00:01:16.789
astronomer at large, back in the chair.
00:01:16.799 --> 00:01:19.749
Hello, Fred. Hello. Hello. Here. All
00:01:19.759 --> 00:01:24.469
ready to go. Fresh and um uh well slept.
00:01:24.479 --> 00:01:26.149
Yeah. So, sort of.
00:01:26.159 --> 00:01:28.070
>> Yeah. I had a weird night last night. I
00:01:28.080 --> 00:01:31.350
I I actually went to sleep fast. Didn't
00:01:31.360 --> 00:01:33.910
I I only woke up kind of and once once,
00:01:33.920 --> 00:01:36.390
which is, you know, a new world record.
00:01:36.400 --> 00:01:41.350
And then um I woke up again 5 5:18 a.m.
00:01:41.360 --> 00:01:43.590
And that was it. My body went, "No, no,
00:01:43.600 --> 00:01:45.910
we're done. You can get up. Go and watch
00:01:45.920 --> 00:01:47.670
something on television because I'm not,
00:01:47.680 --> 00:01:49.190
you know, I don't want to go any to
00:01:49.200 --> 00:01:52.630
sleep ever again." So, here we go. Who
00:01:52.640 --> 00:01:54.870
knows what'll happen tonight. Um, sleep
00:01:54.880 --> 00:01:57.510
is a weird thing. We need it and yet our
00:01:57.520 --> 00:02:01.190
bodies sometimes refuse to comply.
00:02:01.200 --> 00:02:01.749
>> Yeah.
00:02:01.759 --> 00:02:02.149
>> Yeah,
00:02:02.159 --> 00:02:03.910
>> it is. It's bizarre. It's a strange
00:02:03.920 --> 00:02:05.190
thing.
00:02:05.200 --> 00:02:08.150
>> Um, shall we answer some questions?
00:02:08.160 --> 00:02:09.830
>> I thought that was it.
00:02:09.840 --> 00:02:11.350
>> Well, I was just going to say, Fred, why
00:02:11.360 --> 00:02:13.750
can't I sleep?
00:02:13.760 --> 00:02:15.270
>> Let's answer some questions. Yes.
00:02:15.280 --> 00:02:17.589
>> Okay. Our first one comes from Ben. He
00:02:17.599 --> 00:02:20.229
says, uh, Ben here. It's good because I
00:02:20.239 --> 00:02:22.309
thought he was Ben, too. uh the Aussie
00:02:22.319 --> 00:02:24.309
in Chicago with a few new questions. In
00:02:24.319 --> 00:02:26.309
your last question podcast, you
00:02:26.319 --> 00:02:28.630
mentioned about how 80% of matter is
00:02:28.640 --> 00:02:31.589
missing or not visible to us. And it
00:02:31.599 --> 00:02:34.949
made me think, how do we know or measure
00:02:34.959 --> 00:02:37.509
that amount in the first place? I know a
00:02:37.519 --> 00:02:39.270
lot of science is about measuring what
00:02:39.280 --> 00:02:42.229
we didn't find in results, but I'm
00:02:42.239 --> 00:02:44.869
curious about how they came to that 80%
00:02:44.879 --> 00:02:48.070
dark matter number. And secondly, uh,
00:02:48.080 --> 00:02:50.309
for a smaller question, if you could
00:02:50.319 --> 00:02:52.470
pick the next large telescope to be
00:02:52.480 --> 00:02:55.190
launched, what would it be and why? I'd
00:02:55.200 --> 00:02:57.270
personally love to see a new larger
00:02:57.280 --> 00:02:59.509
Hubble type telescope with all the
00:02:59.519 --> 00:03:02.229
advances we've applied to it uh, that
00:03:02.239 --> 00:03:03.830
we've learned from the James Webb Space
00:03:03.840 --> 00:03:05.509
Telescope. Thanks again for the great
00:03:05.519 --> 00:03:07.430
podcast. Thank you, Ben. Great to hear
00:03:07.440 --> 00:03:09.990
from you. Hope all is well in uh, in
00:03:10.000 --> 00:03:12.630
Chicago, home of the Bears. Chicago
00:03:12.640 --> 00:03:14.149
Bears.
00:03:14.159 --> 00:03:19.270
Um right so it's a matter of matter and
00:03:19.280 --> 00:03:22.710
um he's saying we know there's 80% of
00:03:22.720 --> 00:03:24.790
the universe made up of dark matter or
00:03:24.800 --> 00:03:29.270
thereabouts. Uh how do we know that?
00:03:29.280 --> 00:03:33.589
Um we actually the the way that we get
00:03:33.599 --> 00:03:36.070
the you know the accurate figures is
00:03:36.080 --> 00:03:38.550
quite interesting because it involves
00:03:38.560 --> 00:03:42.229
work um of the kind that wasn't possible
00:03:42.239 --> 00:03:44.869
before astronomers started using fiber
00:03:44.879 --> 00:03:47.990
optics in their telescopes and uh that's
00:03:48.000 --> 00:03:51.030
what I did. I was one of the pioneers of
00:03:51.040 --> 00:03:54.070
fiber optics in astronomy. uh and the
00:03:54.080 --> 00:03:56.630
systems that we built back in the 80s,
00:03:56.640 --> 00:03:59.750
the 1980s have now evolved into
00:03:59.760 --> 00:04:02.309
marvelous machines which are fully
00:04:02.319 --> 00:04:06.550
automated. Um the uh organization that I
00:04:06.560 --> 00:04:08.949
worked for has just delivered one to
00:04:08.959 --> 00:04:12.229
Chile which will position 2,400 fibers
00:04:12.239 --> 00:04:15.670
in 57 seconds. Uh and each one of those
00:04:15.680 --> 00:04:18.949
fibers can be aligned with a target star
00:04:18.959 --> 00:04:21.430
or galaxy. uh and that's the way you
00:04:21.440 --> 00:04:23.670
collect lots of information about very
00:04:23.680 --> 00:04:26.469
large numbers of galaxies and about uh
00:04:26.479 --> 00:04:28.629
their velocities what we call their red
00:04:28.639 --> 00:04:30.629
shifts. So we'll get to that in a minute
00:04:30.639 --> 00:04:32.950
because that's that's how we are so
00:04:32.960 --> 00:04:34.469
certain about these numbers because of
00:04:34.479 --> 00:04:37.189
the ability to do that to measure these
00:04:37.199 --> 00:04:38.870
very large numbers of galaxies what we
00:04:38.880 --> 00:04:41.830
call large scale surveys. But the story
00:04:41.840 --> 00:04:46.950
starts uh back in 1933 with Fritz Vicki
00:04:46.960 --> 00:04:49.270
uh the man who famously called some of
00:04:49.280 --> 00:04:52.629
his colleagues uh not just bastards they
00:04:52.639 --> 00:04:54.390
were spherical bastards. Uh the reason
00:04:54.400 --> 00:04:56.950
for that was that they were bastards
00:04:56.960 --> 00:04:58.550
whichever way you looked at them. That's
00:04:58.560 --> 00:05:01.110
why call them spherical bastards.
00:05:01.120 --> 00:05:03.670
>> Astron astronomers love him. Yeah,
00:05:03.680 --> 00:05:07.350
>> I'm sure they do. Yeah. Um, I usually
00:05:07.360 --> 00:05:09.350
tone that down a bit and make it rat
00:05:09.360 --> 00:05:12.230
bags, but for this show I can re
00:05:12.240 --> 00:05:14.390
>> I could quote him verbatim.
00:05:14.400 --> 00:05:16.710
>> It is a quote. Therefore, it's it's a
00:05:16.720 --> 00:05:18.550
quote. Yeah, it's part of it's a part of
00:05:18.560 --> 00:05:19.350
history.
00:05:19.360 --> 00:05:22.230
>> It is indeed part of history. Um, but
00:05:22.240 --> 00:05:24.550
what he was doing was measuring a
00:05:24.560 --> 00:05:25.990
cluster of galaxies actually in the
00:05:26.000 --> 00:05:27.350
northern hemisphere constellation of
00:05:27.360 --> 00:05:30.070
Koma Bernese. Uh, the Koma cluster, a
00:05:30.080 --> 00:05:31.909
very rich cluster of galaxies. And he
00:05:31.919 --> 00:05:33.990
figured out that the he was measuring
00:05:34.000 --> 00:05:36.710
the motions of all the galaxies. And
00:05:36.720 --> 00:05:38.070
when he looked at it, they were all
00:05:38.080 --> 00:05:41.029
going too fast for the gravity of what
00:05:41.039 --> 00:05:43.270
he could see to hold on to them.
00:05:43.280 --> 00:05:46.629
>> So if all that was uh there was what all
00:05:46.639 --> 00:05:48.870
he could see, then this cluster should
00:05:48.880 --> 00:05:51.350
have evaporated gazillions of years ago
00:05:51.360 --> 00:05:54.150
and it hasn't. And he was the person who
00:05:54.160 --> 00:05:56.870
coined the term dark matter. Uh he said
00:05:56.880 --> 00:05:58.150
there's something there that we can't
00:05:58.160 --> 00:06:00.790
see. the ast world of astronomy
00:06:00.800 --> 00:06:02.870
basically ignored it because it was just
00:06:02.880 --> 00:06:04.550
too hard to get your head around.
00:06:04.560 --> 00:06:05.990
There's obviously something wrong. We
00:06:06.000 --> 00:06:07.510
don't know what it is. We'll go and do
00:06:07.520 --> 00:06:10.150
something else. And it wasn't until well
00:06:10.160 --> 00:06:12.309
actually there was an Australian who um
00:06:12.319 --> 00:06:15.189
in 1970 Ken Freeman down at the A&U
00:06:15.199 --> 00:06:19.909
still a good friend uh he um figured out
00:06:19.919 --> 00:06:22.950
that galaxies were rotating too fast for
00:06:22.960 --> 00:06:24.629
the what was in them to hold them
00:06:24.639 --> 00:06:27.909
together. Uh and um that again was
00:06:27.919 --> 00:06:30.870
largely ignored that 1970 result until
00:06:30.880 --> 00:06:34.390
Vera Rubin um basically did the same
00:06:34.400 --> 00:06:36.710
thing but worked out that in order for
00:06:36.720 --> 00:06:39.189
galaxies to stay together and not fly
00:06:39.199 --> 00:06:42.230
apart as they rotate, they must all be
00:06:42.240 --> 00:06:45.350
enveloped in a sort of sphere or halo as
00:06:45.360 --> 00:06:47.350
we call it of something we call dark
00:06:47.360 --> 00:06:49.830
matter. And that in 1978 was the start
00:06:49.840 --> 00:06:52.790
of the modern era of dark matter. And so
00:06:52.800 --> 00:06:55.430
you can actually use those uh those
00:06:55.440 --> 00:06:57.510
measurements to make a crude estimate of
00:06:57.520 --> 00:06:59.830
what's missing. You know that you can
00:06:59.840 --> 00:07:01.589
say use something called the viral
00:07:01.599 --> 00:07:03.029
theorem which I haven't thought about
00:07:03.039 --> 00:07:05.029
for a long time. But that's what lets
00:07:05.039 --> 00:07:07.749
you weigh things by their motion. So you
00:07:07.759 --> 00:07:10.070
can weigh the dark matter uh by the
00:07:10.080 --> 00:07:12.309
motion of galaxies in a cluster for
00:07:12.319 --> 00:07:16.070
example. You can then weigh what you can
00:07:16.080 --> 00:07:18.390
see because you know roughly how much
00:07:18.400 --> 00:07:19.990
stars weigh and the stars are what you
00:07:20.000 --> 00:07:21.990
can see and the gas too. and then you
00:07:22.000 --> 00:07:24.150
can divide one by the other and you do
00:07:24.160 --> 00:07:27.029
get this sort of 80-ish percent. Um, but
00:07:27.039 --> 00:07:30.710
the the way that it's done today, as
00:07:30.720 --> 00:07:32.550
I've said, it involves these very large
00:07:32.560 --> 00:07:35.749
scale surveys of galaxies and their
00:07:35.759 --> 00:07:38.309
positions and velocities in, you know,
00:07:38.319 --> 00:07:40.230
as much of the universe as you can see.
00:07:40.240 --> 00:07:42.070
Very, very large scale surveys involving
00:07:42.080 --> 00:07:44.150
millions of galaxies. And when you do
00:07:44.160 --> 00:07:46.150
that, you can make statistical
00:07:46.160 --> 00:07:48.629
deductions that tell you that uh the
00:07:48.639 --> 00:07:50.950
universe is made of something like 70%
00:07:50.960 --> 00:07:54.469
dark energy, uh about 20% dark matter,
00:07:54.479 --> 00:07:57.430
about 5% normal matter, uh most of which
00:07:57.440 --> 00:07:59.830
is hydrogen. So that that comes from the
00:07:59.840 --> 00:08:02.230
large scale surveys. And it's because
00:08:02.240 --> 00:08:05.510
the positions of galaxies are actually
00:08:05.520 --> 00:08:07.589
determined by the gravitational forces
00:08:07.599 --> 00:08:10.070
that they feel. And you know that's the
00:08:10.080 --> 00:08:11.990
key to understanding dark matter and
00:08:12.000 --> 00:08:14.390
dark energy to see how these forces
00:08:14.400 --> 00:08:15.270
stack up.
00:08:15.280 --> 00:08:18.150
>> It's so hard to comprehend because when
00:08:18.160 --> 00:08:21.749
you say that 5% of the universe is made
00:08:21.759 --> 00:08:24.710
up of stars, planets and gas, and you
00:08:24.720 --> 00:08:26.869
look out into space and see so many
00:08:26.879 --> 00:08:30.309
stars, so many other things, and yet
00:08:30.319 --> 00:08:32.469
you're only seeing 5% of what out what
00:08:32.479 --> 00:08:34.870
is out there. It's it's it's
00:08:34.880 --> 00:08:36.310
mind-blowing.
00:08:36.320 --> 00:08:39.509
>> That's right. I mean some of that that
00:08:39.519 --> 00:08:41.909
figure of 5% is the when you look at it
00:08:41.919 --> 00:08:43.430
as a fraction of the mass and energy
00:08:43.440 --> 00:08:45.910
budget and energy and matter you know
00:08:45.920 --> 00:08:49.590
they're interchangeable E= MC² uh and so
00:08:49.600 --> 00:08:50.949
uh it's when you do that some you
00:08:50.959 --> 00:08:55.350
realize that yes um 70% of the mass
00:08:55.360 --> 00:08:57.190
energy budget of the universe is dark
00:08:57.200 --> 00:09:00.949
energy uh 20% is dark matter 5%
00:09:00.959 --> 00:09:04.389
thereabouts uh is is normal matter but
00:09:04.399 --> 00:09:06.230
most of that normal matter is invisible
00:09:06.240 --> 00:09:07.670
to because most of it is just called
00:09:07.680 --> 00:09:08.630
hydrogen.
00:09:08.640 --> 00:09:10.870
>> Uh the the you know the materials that
00:09:10.880 --> 00:09:12.949
make up the the planets in particular
00:09:12.959 --> 00:09:16.230
the the um you know the normal elements
00:09:16.240 --> 00:09:19.190
that we see around us on earth there's a
00:09:19.200 --> 00:09:21.509
vanishingly small fraction of that uh
00:09:21.519 --> 00:09:23.750
that represents you know the their
00:09:23.760 --> 00:09:25.430
fraction within the universe.
00:09:25.440 --> 00:09:28.070
>> Yeah. All right. So that covers his 80%
00:09:28.080 --> 00:09:30.550
question. But uh he asks a question
00:09:30.560 --> 00:09:34.230
about what will be the next uh large
00:09:34.240 --> 00:09:35.990
telescope to be launched. What would you
00:09:36.000 --> 00:09:37.990
like it to be?
00:09:38.000 --> 00:09:39.750
>> Um, yeah, that's an interesting
00:09:39.760 --> 00:09:41.269
question. I mean, the thing that I'm
00:09:41.279 --> 00:09:43.509
looking forward to, and we'll see it
00:09:43.519 --> 00:09:45.910
online within the next probably two
00:09:45.920 --> 00:09:48.630
years, is the ELT, the extremely large
00:09:48.640 --> 00:09:50.389
telescope down in Chile. That's going to
00:09:50.399 --> 00:09:53.670
be a visible light telescope with uh a
00:09:53.680 --> 00:09:57.990
mirror 39 m in diameter.
00:09:58.000 --> 00:10:00.870
uh and it will be able to observe
00:10:00.880 --> 00:10:03.910
because it's got this very sophisticated
00:10:03.920 --> 00:10:06.230
adaptive optic system that effectively
00:10:06.240 --> 00:10:09.829
puts it above the atmosphere. Um it's uh
00:10:09.839 --> 00:10:14.069
it is uh it will have 20 times the
00:10:14.079 --> 00:10:16.630
resolution of the Hubble telescope. So
00:10:16.640 --> 00:10:18.310
if you thought the Hubble images that
00:10:18.320 --> 00:10:20.389
you see have fine detail in them, wait
00:10:20.399 --> 00:10:21.670
till you see what's going to come from
00:10:21.680 --> 00:10:23.910
the ELT because it'll be 20 times
00:10:23.920 --> 00:10:27.110
better. And the reason why that's my
00:10:27.120 --> 00:10:30.310
favorite big telescope is that its cost
00:10:30.320 --> 00:10:32.470
has been almost since the beginning
00:10:32.480 --> 00:10:35.509
estimated at 1.3 billion euros and it
00:10:35.519 --> 00:10:38.230
still is. Uh it's on on budget and
00:10:38.240 --> 00:10:40.630
pretty well on time. Uh and remember the
00:10:40.640 --> 00:10:43.590
James Webb telescope cost10 billion.
00:10:43.600 --> 00:10:44.069
>> Yeah.
00:10:44.079 --> 00:10:47.350
>> To build launch and and you know and
00:10:47.360 --> 00:10:50.470
keep it going. uh the
00:10:50.480 --> 00:10:52.550
as soon as you put things into space,
00:10:52.560 --> 00:10:55.509
the price tag goes up enormously, which
00:10:55.519 --> 00:10:57.350
is why I'm a big fan of groundbased
00:10:57.360 --> 00:10:59.269
astronomy, especially when we now have
00:10:59.279 --> 00:11:01.910
sites like Sarah Amazon is in northern
00:11:01.920 --> 00:11:04.550
Chile, which is where the ELT will be uh
00:11:04.560 --> 00:11:08.949
whose whose uh you know whose clarity
00:11:08.959 --> 00:11:12.630
and atmospheric stability you can hone
00:11:12.640 --> 00:11:14.949
with that adaptive optics system that
00:11:14.959 --> 00:11:17.030
the telescope's going to be fitted with.
00:11:17.040 --> 00:11:17.350
M.
00:11:17.360 --> 00:11:19.750
>> So, um, that's that's what I'm looking
00:11:19.760 --> 00:11:21.509
out for next. I don't think you need to
00:11:21.519 --> 00:11:23.190
launch anything else into space to get
00:11:23.200 --> 00:11:25.430
anywhere near what the ELT will do.
00:11:25.440 --> 00:11:26.389
>> Very exciting.
00:11:26.399 --> 00:11:28.230
>> Yeah. I heard they're going to have a
00:11:28.240 --> 00:11:30.870
visitors center at the ELT, but the only
00:11:30.880 --> 00:11:35.910
thing on the menu will be BLT, so
00:11:35.920 --> 00:11:37.990
I had to do that joke. It just, you
00:11:38.000 --> 00:11:40.630
know, my brain doesn't let me stop
00:11:40.640 --> 00:11:41.750
sometimes.
00:11:41.760 --> 00:11:43.990
>> No, it
00:11:44.000 --> 00:11:46.310
uh Thank you, Ben, for the question.
00:11:46.320 --> 00:11:48.710
Great to hear from you.
00:11:48.720 --> 00:11:51.670
Let's talk about our sponsor, NordVPN.
00:11:51.680 --> 00:11:53.430
Now, if you care about your privacy
00:11:53.440 --> 00:11:55.829
online, maybe it's time to start
00:11:55.839 --> 00:11:57.430
thinking about a virtual private
00:11:57.440 --> 00:12:01.430
network. And NordVPN is by far the best
00:12:01.440 --> 00:12:03.829
you can get. It's one of the fastest and
00:12:03.839 --> 00:12:06.710
most trusted VPN services as well,
00:12:06.720 --> 00:12:09.110
helping uh you protect your personal
00:12:09.120 --> 00:12:11.430
data, secure your internet connection,
00:12:11.440 --> 00:12:13.750
and browse with peace of mind, whether
00:12:13.760 --> 00:12:17.350
you're at home or on public Wi-Fi. With
00:12:17.360 --> 00:12:20.389
just one click, NordVPN encrypts your
00:12:20.399 --> 00:12:23.509
traffic, hides your IP address, uh keeps
00:12:23.519 --> 00:12:25.190
your information safe from hackers,
00:12:25.200 --> 00:12:28.389
trackers, and snoopers, and you can also
00:12:28.399 --> 00:12:30.389
access content from around the world
00:12:30.399 --> 00:12:31.990
without restrictions, thanks to
00:12:32.000 --> 00:12:34.310
thousands of servers in over 60
00:12:34.320 --> 00:12:37.430
countries. And as a listener of Space
00:12:37.440 --> 00:12:40.310
Nuts, you get an exclusive deal at
00:12:40.320 --> 00:12:43.670
nordvpn.com/spacenuts.
00:12:43.680 --> 00:12:47.030
huge savings, plus an extra 4 months
00:12:47.040 --> 00:12:49.829
free when you sign up. It's simple, it's
00:12:49.839 --> 00:12:53.269
fast, it's secure, it works. Go to
00:12:53.279 --> 00:12:56.310
nordvpn.com/spacenuts
00:12:56.320 --> 00:12:58.310
and take control of your internet
00:12:58.320 --> 00:13:00.069
experience today. That's
00:13:00.079 --> 00:13:04.069
nordvpn.com/spacenuts.
00:13:04.079 --> 00:13:06.310
Don't forget the code word spacenuts and
00:13:06.320 --> 00:13:09.509
their 30-day money back guarantee.
00:13:09.519 --> 00:13:11.350
>> Roger, you're here also.
00:13:11.360 --> 00:13:13.269
>> Spacenuts. Uh, I'm going to do a bit of
00:13:13.279 --> 00:13:15.030
a switcheroo here because we we're
00:13:15.040 --> 00:13:16.790
already talking about telescopes and
00:13:16.800 --> 00:13:18.629
we've got a question about telescopes.
00:13:18.639 --> 00:13:20.230
So, we might just jump straight to that
00:13:20.240 --> 00:13:22.790
one. Uh, hi Fred and Andrew. Just
00:13:22.800 --> 00:13:26.069
wondering if Fred can shed some light,
00:13:26.079 --> 00:13:29.110
puny intended. Uh, on telescopes and the
00:13:29.120 --> 00:13:30.710
different types of light they can
00:13:30.720 --> 00:13:32.949
detect. I was recently thinking about
00:13:32.959 --> 00:13:35.030
how the James Webb Space Telescope uses
00:13:35.040 --> 00:13:37.430
mirrors to observe infrared light but
00:13:37.440 --> 00:13:39.910
not visible light while Hubble also uses
00:13:39.920 --> 00:13:41.990
mirrors for visible light yet can't
00:13:42.000 --> 00:13:44.949
really see infrared. Uh that got me
00:13:44.959 --> 00:13:47.269
wondering how mirrors, detectors and
00:13:47.279 --> 00:13:49.829
telescope design all come together or
00:13:49.839 --> 00:13:52.470
don't uh for different uh wavelengths.
00:13:52.480 --> 00:13:54.310
Could you please walk us through the
00:13:54.320 --> 00:13:56.310
various types of telescopes, optical,
00:13:56.320 --> 00:13:58.389
infrared, radio, all the way to gamma,
00:13:58.399 --> 00:14:00.150
and explain what kinds of light they
00:14:00.160 --> 00:14:02.629
detect, how they do it, and why each
00:14:02.639 --> 00:14:04.790
telescope can only be used in certain
00:14:04.800 --> 00:14:07.269
ways. Absolutely love the show. May your
00:14:07.279 --> 00:14:09.910
rain uh may you reign supreme for many
00:14:09.920 --> 00:14:12.870
years to come. Cheers, Ash. Thank you,
00:14:12.880 --> 00:14:16.150
Ash. And um yeah, he just wants to know
00:14:16.160 --> 00:14:17.509
everything you've ever written down
00:14:17.519 --> 00:14:19.509
about telescopes. Fred,
00:14:19.519 --> 00:14:20.870
>> yeah, there's a book on it. I I
00:14:20.880 --> 00:14:23.110
recommend Ash Hunted Out.
00:14:23.120 --> 00:14:25.350
>> It's called Star Stargazer, the life and
00:14:25.360 --> 00:14:27.030
times of the telescope. It's the first
00:14:27.040 --> 00:14:30.310
big thick book that I wrote. Uh and
00:14:30.320 --> 00:14:32.389
still one of my favorites because um
00:14:32.399 --> 00:14:34.230
even though it's slightly out of date,
00:14:34.240 --> 00:14:36.790
it opens by talking about what used to
00:14:36.800 --> 00:14:39.350
be called Owl, uh the overwhelmingly
00:14:39.360 --> 00:14:41.750
large telescope, which was actually the
00:14:41.760 --> 00:14:43.430
precursor of the ELT we were just
00:14:43.440 --> 00:14:45.269
talking about there, right? But when
00:14:45.279 --> 00:14:49.430
they were proposing owl um which had an
00:14:49.440 --> 00:14:51.910
overwhelmingly large mirror of 100 m in
00:14:51.920 --> 00:14:53.990
diameter and then they realized it also
00:14:54.000 --> 00:14:56.069
had an overwhelmingly large price tag
00:14:56.079 --> 00:14:58.629
which is why it came down to 39 m and
00:14:58.639 --> 00:15:00.790
that's fine because that's still an
00:15:00.800 --> 00:15:02.949
extremely big telescope. Anyway, um
00:15:02.959 --> 00:15:04.629
that's that's the plug over. That's the
00:15:04.639 --> 00:15:09.910
advert over. Uh so basically telescopes
00:15:09.920 --> 00:15:12.949
have sort of got the same ingredients no
00:15:12.959 --> 00:15:15.829
matter what they're observing. Uh and
00:15:15.839 --> 00:15:17.509
that is something to gather the
00:15:17.519 --> 00:15:19.910
radiation and whether that's very short
00:15:19.920 --> 00:15:22.949
wavelength radiation like gamma rays or
00:15:22.959 --> 00:15:25.030
long wavelength radiation like radio
00:15:25.040 --> 00:15:27.030
waves. Uh you've got something to gather
00:15:27.040 --> 00:15:30.710
the radiation uh and either focus it in
00:15:30.720 --> 00:15:32.710
some way or at least concentrate it and
00:15:32.720 --> 00:15:35.670
then something to detect it. And it's
00:15:35.680 --> 00:15:39.430
usually the detectors that are perhaps
00:15:39.440 --> 00:15:42.710
the most waveband critical because you
00:15:42.720 --> 00:15:45.509
need different detectors for example to
00:15:45.519 --> 00:15:48.150
detect visible light uh from the ones
00:15:48.160 --> 00:15:50.629
that you would use to detect infrared
00:15:50.639 --> 00:15:53.509
light. Um it's and and again it depends
00:15:53.519 --> 00:15:57.350
on the infrared wavelength. Uh so I I
00:15:57.360 --> 00:16:00.389
guess starting right at the the short
00:16:00.399 --> 00:16:03.430
wavelength end with gamma ray and x-ray
00:16:03.440 --> 00:16:07.030
detectors um they are almost the same
00:16:07.040 --> 00:16:09.430
sort of technology as as are used in
00:16:09.440 --> 00:16:12.150
medical imaging. Uh but to focus them
00:16:12.160 --> 00:16:14.230
you've got to have very special
00:16:14.240 --> 00:16:16.710
technologies. um my recollection of
00:16:16.720 --> 00:16:19.269
gammaray telescopes and things might
00:16:19.279 --> 00:16:22.230
have changed a little bit here but the
00:16:22.240 --> 00:16:24.230
they made mirrors which were called
00:16:24.240 --> 00:16:26.949
grazing incidence mirrors which looked
00:16:26.959 --> 00:16:29.749
more like a piece of origyami than than
00:16:29.759 --> 00:16:32.470
a a reflector that you'd imagine but
00:16:32.480 --> 00:16:34.470
they did focus the light to to provide
00:16:34.480 --> 00:16:36.069
that thing and then you go to
00:16:36.079 --> 00:16:39.110
ultraviolet the Hubble is sensitive to
00:16:39.120 --> 00:16:41.509
ultraviolet light um and that for that
00:16:41.519 --> 00:16:43.910
it needed a very precise mirror and we
00:16:43.920 --> 00:16:45.670
all know that the mirror was made very
00:16:45.680 --> 00:16:48.389
precisely but to the wrong prescription
00:16:48.399 --> 00:16:50.389
uh uh for reasons that we haven't time
00:16:50.399 --> 00:16:53.430
to go into. Uh so once again you know
00:16:53.440 --> 00:16:55.430
the detector is sensitive to ultraviolet
00:16:55.440 --> 00:16:57.590
radiation. In fact they've got wideband
00:16:57.600 --> 00:17:00.230
quite wideband detectors. Um Hubble can
00:17:00.240 --> 00:17:03.749
detect longwavelength ultraviolet
00:17:03.759 --> 00:17:05.909
whole of the visible and also the short
00:17:05.919 --> 00:17:07.990
wavelength infrared what we call the
00:17:08.000 --> 00:17:10.710
near infrared. Uh and its mirror and
00:17:10.720 --> 00:17:12.630
detectors are capable of doing that.
00:17:12.640 --> 00:17:14.470
When you go up to the James Web, you're
00:17:14.480 --> 00:17:17.270
right. That's tuned for infrared light.
00:17:17.280 --> 00:17:19.990
And that means your tolerances on the
00:17:20.000 --> 00:17:22.710
accuracy of the mirror are slightly less
00:17:22.720 --> 00:17:24.949
because infrared light's got a longer
00:17:24.959 --> 00:17:28.470
wavelength. And you know how how
00:17:28.480 --> 00:17:30.390
accurate your mirror mirror needs to be
00:17:30.400 --> 00:17:32.630
made is dependent on the wavelength. The
00:17:32.640 --> 00:17:34.549
longer the wavelength, the more relaxed
00:17:34.559 --> 00:17:36.310
you can be about the shape of the
00:17:36.320 --> 00:17:39.350
mirror. Uh so web telescope slightly
00:17:39.360 --> 00:17:42.070
more relaxed although still to very high
00:17:42.080 --> 00:17:44.230
tolerances but the detectors are the
00:17:44.240 --> 00:17:46.789
thing that really render it uh not
00:17:46.799 --> 00:17:49.510
suitable for visible light uh it's got
00:17:49.520 --> 00:17:51.909
definitely got infrared uh sensitive
00:17:51.919 --> 00:17:53.430
detectors.
00:17:53.440 --> 00:17:56.549
It's also got a gold coating uh and
00:17:56.559 --> 00:17:58.630
that's so that rather than a an
00:17:58.640 --> 00:18:00.310
aluminium or silver coating like a
00:18:00.320 --> 00:18:02.070
visible light telescope would have, it's
00:18:02.080 --> 00:18:04.230
got a gold coating because gold reflects
00:18:04.240 --> 00:18:06.310
infrared light better. And then you get
00:18:06.320 --> 00:18:07.990
up to radio waves and you're talking
00:18:08.000 --> 00:18:11.590
about um often dishes and you know a
00:18:11.600 --> 00:18:15.029
dish is just a big mirror but uh one
00:18:15.039 --> 00:18:17.510
that's as I said before it doesn't have
00:18:17.520 --> 00:18:19.510
to be as accurate as the mirror on a
00:18:19.520 --> 00:18:20.789
visible light telescope because the
00:18:20.799 --> 00:18:22.789
wavelength is longer and that's why we
00:18:22.799 --> 00:18:25.270
see these much bigger bigger telescopes
00:18:25.280 --> 00:18:29.029
for radio waves. Uh you get the same
00:18:29.039 --> 00:18:31.830
um sensitivity to detail uh with a
00:18:31.840 --> 00:18:33.909
bigger dish than you do with visible
00:18:33.919 --> 00:18:35.510
light. with a smaller dish. That's
00:18:35.520 --> 00:18:37.110
because that sensitive to details
00:18:37.120 --> 00:18:39.350
proportional to the wavelength. Um, but
00:18:39.360 --> 00:18:41.990
the detectors are quite different in
00:18:42.000 --> 00:18:45.110
radio telescopes. They use often very
00:18:45.120 --> 00:18:46.950
sophisticated technologies where they're
00:18:46.960 --> 00:18:49.510
actually measuring the waveform itself,
00:18:49.520 --> 00:18:51.510
which you don't do with visible light,
00:18:51.520 --> 00:18:53.350
what are called hetradine receivers and
00:18:53.360 --> 00:18:55.350
things of that sort. So, um, that's
00:18:55.360 --> 00:18:57.830
walking through the various types of
00:18:57.840 --> 00:19:00.950
telescopes as you've suggested. Ash, is
00:19:00.960 --> 00:19:02.870
there another bit to the question uh,
00:19:02.880 --> 00:19:04.390
how they do it? Well, I've explained
00:19:04.400 --> 00:19:06.230
that why each telescope can only be used
00:19:06.240 --> 00:19:07.270
in certain ways. Yeah.
00:19:07.280 --> 00:19:10.070
>> Yeah. I guess the question he asks
00:19:10.080 --> 00:19:11.750
prompts a question in my mind or a
00:19:11.760 --> 00:19:13.830
suggestion that you really could not
00:19:13.840 --> 00:19:16.470
build a single telescope that could do
00:19:16.480 --> 00:19:18.710
absolutely everything you'd want to do
00:19:18.720 --> 00:19:21.029
on all spectrums.
00:19:21.039 --> 00:19:24.070
>> Um that's correct. There is a there is a
00:19:24.080 --> 00:19:25.590
device
00:19:25.600 --> 00:19:28.870
which uh in fact is only used really in
00:19:28.880 --> 00:19:31.270
the microwave region of the spectrum. uh
00:19:31.280 --> 00:19:34.070
but it's called a bometer and a bometer
00:19:34.080 --> 00:19:36.870
is something that is basically detects
00:19:36.880 --> 00:19:38.710
stuff but it's insensitive to
00:19:38.720 --> 00:19:41.750
wavelength. So in a sense a bometer a
00:19:41.760 --> 00:19:43.909
perfect bometer will be able to detect
00:19:43.919 --> 00:19:45.909
all wavelengths. Now the reality is you
00:19:45.919 --> 00:19:47.909
can't do that but that's the notion
00:19:47.919 --> 00:19:50.870
behind a bometer and what it means is
00:19:50.880 --> 00:19:54.390
that for microwave astronomy um the
00:19:54.400 --> 00:19:56.710
bometer gives you a very wide range of
00:19:56.720 --> 00:20:00.070
wavelengths to cover. So when you are
00:20:00.080 --> 00:20:02.630
planning to build a telescope,
00:20:02.640 --> 00:20:04.870
do you have an objective in mind before
00:20:04.880 --> 00:20:07.590
you build it or do you build it and then
00:20:07.600 --> 00:20:09.590
think well what can we do this?
00:20:09.600 --> 00:20:11.430
>> No, it's definitely the other way
00:20:11.440 --> 00:20:13.270
around. You you start off with a science
00:20:13.280 --> 00:20:15.750
case. What are the questions that we
00:20:15.760 --> 00:20:17.909
really think are the most urgent
00:20:17.919 --> 00:20:20.230
questions to answer? And you've got
00:20:20.240 --> 00:20:22.310
things like um you know the nature of
00:20:22.320 --> 00:20:25.190
dark energy, the nature of dark matter.
00:20:25.200 --> 00:20:27.029
Uh are there any living organisms
00:20:27.039 --> 00:20:28.470
anywhere else in the univer all the all
00:20:28.480 --> 00:20:29.909
the questions that you and I talk about
00:20:29.919 --> 00:20:32.310
on the show are the ones that scientists
00:20:32.320 --> 00:20:34.070
are still intrigued by and there are
00:20:34.080 --> 00:20:35.750
many others as well. The details of the
00:20:35.760 --> 00:20:38.310
way galaxies interact with environments.
00:20:38.320 --> 00:20:41.350
What about all these um young galaxies
00:20:41.360 --> 00:20:44.789
that seem to be more mature than we
00:20:44.799 --> 00:20:46.470
think they should be at, you know, when
00:20:46.480 --> 00:20:47.830
the universe is only a couple hundred
00:20:47.840 --> 00:20:49.830
million years old? Questions like that.
00:20:49.840 --> 00:20:51.750
They're all the ones that would go into
00:20:51.760 --> 00:20:54.789
the science case for a project. But
00:20:54.799 --> 00:20:56.789
there is always the background that
00:20:56.799 --> 00:20:58.710
you're going to find things out that you
00:20:58.720 --> 00:21:01.110
simply did not expect to find out. So
00:21:01.120 --> 00:21:03.350
that's usually added into the science
00:21:03.360 --> 00:21:05.270
case. The stuff that we just don't
00:21:05.280 --> 00:21:07.750
expect. Serendipitous discovery. There's
00:21:07.760 --> 00:21:10.870
been so many of those um made by the
00:21:10.880 --> 00:21:12.470
world's great telescopes.
00:21:12.480 --> 00:21:14.789
>> Yeah, thank you Ash. That's a great
00:21:14.799 --> 00:21:16.390
question and I could tell Fred was
00:21:16.400 --> 00:21:18.070
excited about it. I I'm just going to go
00:21:18.080 --> 00:21:19.909
I'm going to go back to Ben's question
00:21:19.919 --> 00:21:21.430
about, you know, what do you want the
00:21:21.440 --> 00:21:23.830
next um big thing in telescopes to be?
00:21:23.840 --> 00:21:25.750
I've thought of one. I I want to see the
00:21:25.760 --> 00:21:28.390
FWST.
00:21:28.400 --> 00:21:32.149
>> Uh Fred Watson Space Telescope. That's
00:21:32.159 --> 00:21:32.950
that's what I
00:21:32.960 --> 00:21:34.710
>> want to sound. Yeah, I do too.
00:21:34.720 --> 00:21:36.149
>> I want the sound of that. Thank you. Oh,
00:21:36.159 --> 00:21:38.149
well, you're a pioneer in fiber optics.
00:21:38.159 --> 00:21:39.830
I mean, it makes sense to me that you
00:21:39.840 --> 00:21:42.230
should have one named after you.
00:21:42.240 --> 00:21:42.710
>> Yeah.
00:21:42.720 --> 00:21:45.350
>> I always um I always think the reason
00:21:45.360 --> 00:21:47.430
for my hairstyle is because I worked in
00:21:47.440 --> 00:21:49.190
fiber optics cuz the individual
00:21:49.200 --> 00:21:52.390
follicules got jealous of all these thin
00:21:52.400 --> 00:21:53.909
strands of material that I was playing
00:21:53.919 --> 00:21:55.270
with and they all just fell out.
00:21:55.280 --> 00:21:56.789
>> Yeah, they gave up. Yeah. They said,
00:21:56.799 --> 00:21:58.470
"No, we can't beat that. See you later,
00:21:58.480 --> 00:22:00.149
France.
00:22:00.159 --> 00:22:02.870
We're going somewhere else." Uh, thanks
00:22:02.880 --> 00:22:04.310
Ash for the for the question. And this
00:22:04.320 --> 00:22:06.630
is Space Nuts with Andrew Dunley and
00:22:06.640 --> 00:22:10.710
Professor Fred Watson, a Q&A edition.
00:22:10.720 --> 00:22:13.110
Let's tell you about our sponsor,
00:22:13.120 --> 00:22:15.510
Incogn. Now, if you've been overwhelmed
00:22:15.520 --> 00:22:18.870
by a barrage of spam calls and emails
00:22:18.880 --> 00:22:22.390
and targeted ads, rooc calls, it's
00:22:22.400 --> 00:22:25.110
probably because they can find you
00:22:25.120 --> 00:22:27.669
online very, very easily and just
00:22:27.679 --> 00:22:30.549
harvest your contact information. If
00:22:30.559 --> 00:22:32.470
you've ever felt like that, then the
00:22:32.480 --> 00:22:35.830
answer is incogn. Uh what happens is
00:22:35.840 --> 00:22:38.230
data brokers collect and sell your
00:22:38.240 --> 00:22:41.029
details leading to an endless array of
00:22:41.039 --> 00:22:43.669
spam and other potential risks. And if
00:22:43.679 --> 00:22:45.909
you want to get rid of that, Incogn is
00:22:45.919 --> 00:22:48.070
the answer. It's your personal data
00:22:48.080 --> 00:22:50.710
removal assistant. It automatically
00:22:50.720 --> 00:22:54.230
sends removal requests to over 210 data
00:22:54.240 --> 00:22:56.870
brokers, ensuring your information is
00:22:56.880 --> 00:22:59.510
taken down. You can even watch the
00:22:59.520 --> 00:23:01.990
progress of it through uh an online
00:23:02.000 --> 00:23:04.390
dashboard. With weekly updates, you can
00:23:04.400 --> 00:23:06.310
track the cleansing of your digital
00:23:06.320 --> 00:23:09.270
footprint. Plus, there's a 30-day money
00:23:09.280 --> 00:23:12.310
back guarantee. So, it's riskfree.
00:23:12.320 --> 00:23:15.190
It's called Incogn. Take control of your
00:23:15.200 --> 00:23:16.630
online presence. Visit
00:23:16.640 --> 00:23:19.029
incogn.com/spacenuts.
00:23:19.039 --> 00:23:22.390
And here's the kicker. 60% off if you
00:23:22.400 --> 00:23:25.110
use the code word spacenuts. That's
00:23:25.120 --> 00:23:28.789
incogn.com/spacenuts.
00:23:28.799 --> 00:23:31.590
60% off if you use the code word
00:23:31.600 --> 00:23:34.549
spaceenuts. Enjoy a peaceful online
00:23:34.559 --> 00:23:38.630
existence without digital disturbance.
00:23:38.640 --> 00:23:40.630
>> Swift
00:23:40.640 --> 00:23:42.789
base here. The angle has landed.
00:23:42.799 --> 00:23:43.909
>> Space nets.
00:23:43.919 --> 00:23:47.110
>> Our next question comes from somebody
00:23:47.120 --> 00:23:49.830
else. Uh, hi Fred and Andrew. Gravity is
00:23:49.840 --> 00:23:52.390
described by Einstein's theories as the
00:23:52.400 --> 00:23:54.390
bending of spaceime in the presence of
00:23:54.400 --> 00:23:58.310
massive objects. Great. Why then does
00:23:58.320 --> 00:24:00.630
physics discuss the hypothetical
00:24:00.640 --> 00:24:03.590
graviton as a force carrier for gravity?
00:24:03.600 --> 00:24:06.230
Uh what would a graviton look like were
00:24:06.240 --> 00:24:08.710
we to discover it uh or discover its
00:24:08.720 --> 00:24:11.830
existence? And why is it needed at all
00:24:11.840 --> 00:24:14.070
in the context of Einstein's theory?
00:24:14.080 --> 00:24:15.830
Thanks. Keep up the good work. Love the
00:24:15.840 --> 00:24:19.110
show. Russ from Stalbridge
00:24:19.120 --> 00:24:21.510
in the UK. Stalbridge
00:24:21.520 --> 00:24:22.870
>> it is. That's right. It's in the
00:24:22.880 --> 00:24:25.029
Midlands. Stbridge, I think, if I
00:24:25.039 --> 00:24:26.789
remember rightly.
00:24:26.799 --> 00:24:28.310
I mean,
00:24:28.320 --> 00:24:32.470
>> um, yeah, it's a good question. Uh, and
00:24:32.480 --> 00:24:35.590
that's kind of hard to know how to how
00:24:35.600 --> 00:24:38.070
to start it because there's so much to
00:24:38.080 --> 00:24:41.990
say. So, um, yes, general relativity,
00:24:42.000 --> 00:24:45.029
exactly as Ross says, uh, is that
00:24:45.039 --> 00:24:48.149
spacetime bends, uh, or the theory says
00:24:48.159 --> 00:24:50.630
spacetime bends, uh, when you've got
00:24:50.640 --> 00:24:53.990
matter there. Uh, and all the evidence
00:24:54.000 --> 00:24:56.630
is that general relativity is absolutely
00:24:56.640 --> 00:24:59.669
on the money. It's um, you know, it
00:24:59.679 --> 00:25:03.190
meets its predictions with with such a
00:25:03.200 --> 00:25:05.909
high level of accuracy that it's almost
00:25:05.919 --> 00:25:07.669
mind-blowing. If I remember rightly, I
00:25:07.679 --> 00:25:09.909
think it's one part in 10 to the 18 or
00:25:09.919 --> 00:25:11.029
something like that that it's been
00:25:11.039 --> 00:25:15.510
proven to work uh for. So uh that's
00:25:15.520 --> 00:25:20.230
great but um the physicists who look at
00:25:20.240 --> 00:25:23.029
the other end of the of the size scale
00:25:23.039 --> 00:25:25.590
the ones who are interested in quantum
00:25:25.600 --> 00:25:28.310
mechanics and uh you know particle
00:25:28.320 --> 00:25:33.269
physics uh sub subatomic particles they
00:25:33.279 --> 00:25:36.470
say that all forces
00:25:36.480 --> 00:25:38.630
uh and and here we're talking about
00:25:38.640 --> 00:25:41.029
gravity in the Newtonian sense that it's
00:25:41.039 --> 00:25:44.710
a force uh have have a particle that
00:25:44.720 --> 00:25:47.590
carries them. And so, you know, we've
00:25:47.600 --> 00:25:49.590
got the photon for electromagnetic
00:25:49.600 --> 00:25:53.750
force. We've got the um the various uh
00:25:53.760 --> 00:25:56.390
force carriers for the strong and weak
00:25:56.400 --> 00:25:59.909
nuclear forces. Um and we've also got
00:25:59.919 --> 00:26:03.190
now the Higs field, the the the Higs
00:26:03.200 --> 00:26:06.390
Bzon. So what they're saying is that the
00:26:06.400 --> 00:26:08.390
because gravity works that way there
00:26:08.400 --> 00:26:12.230
should be a bzon that carries gravity
00:26:12.240 --> 00:26:14.789
and that's the idea of a hypothetical
00:26:14.799 --> 00:26:19.510
graviton. Um my suspicion as to how that
00:26:19.520 --> 00:26:23.830
links with relativity comes from the the
00:26:23.840 --> 00:26:25.909
the
00:26:25.919 --> 00:26:28.470
description of uh of the Higs Bzon that
00:26:28.480 --> 00:26:29.990
I think we might have talked about a few
00:26:30.000 --> 00:26:35.350
weeks ago. So the Higs Bzon is I think
00:26:35.360 --> 00:26:37.110
somebody asked about you know how how do
00:26:37.120 --> 00:26:39.430
you reconcile the Higs Bzon with
00:26:39.440 --> 00:26:40.549
something that gives all the other
00:26:40.559 --> 00:26:43.669
forces their their mass
00:26:43.679 --> 00:26:46.230
>> because that's what the Bzon does. And
00:26:46.240 --> 00:26:47.669
the bottom line is that what you're
00:26:47.679 --> 00:26:49.750
really talking about is the Higs field,
00:26:49.760 --> 00:26:52.310
which is something like they usually
00:26:52.320 --> 00:26:55.830
talk about syrup or molasses. Uh, and as
00:26:55.840 --> 00:26:57.669
the particles move through it, they get
00:26:57.679 --> 00:27:00.390
they get resistance because they're uh,
00:27:00.400 --> 00:27:01.830
you know, because they're in this sticky
00:27:01.840 --> 00:27:05.029
stuff. Uh, and that gives them the
00:27:05.039 --> 00:27:08.710
effect of mass. It's not an analogy that
00:27:08.720 --> 00:27:11.350
thrills me, I have to say, but it kind
00:27:11.360 --> 00:27:14.470
of gets the idea. And the only time the
00:27:14.480 --> 00:27:17.830
Higs Bzon itself appears is when you've
00:27:17.840 --> 00:27:20.070
got something a collision between
00:27:20.080 --> 00:27:23.110
particles. So the Higs field is is the
00:27:23.120 --> 00:27:25.909
main thing. But if you collide particles
00:27:25.919 --> 00:27:28.310
together, you get this thing that
00:27:28.320 --> 00:27:30.390
emerges from the Higs field which is
00:27:30.400 --> 00:27:32.549
called the Higs Bzon. And that can be
00:27:32.559 --> 00:27:35.350
measured which it was in 2012. And my
00:27:35.360 --> 00:27:37.830
guess is that gravity, the graviton
00:27:37.840 --> 00:27:39.269
would be something like it. It would be
00:27:39.279 --> 00:27:41.669
a Bzon. it would emerge from the gravity
00:27:41.679 --> 00:27:44.390
field maybe would emerge when there were
00:27:44.400 --> 00:27:47.110
collisions in particle accelerators but
00:27:47.120 --> 00:27:50.710
we have no evidence for it yet. So um I
00:27:50.720 --> 00:27:52.950
think um you know Russ I think that's
00:27:52.960 --> 00:27:55.510
the bottom line that uh like the search
00:27:55.520 --> 00:27:58.310
for the Higs Bzon one day the Higs the
00:27:58.320 --> 00:28:01.190
search for the graviton will basically
00:28:01.200 --> 00:28:04.230
cough up the goods uh and uh and we'll
00:28:04.240 --> 00:28:06.149
we'll understand it perhaps in a similar
00:28:06.159 --> 00:28:08.070
way to the way we understand the Higs
00:28:08.080 --> 00:28:11.430
Bzon that you need um to actively create
00:28:11.440 --> 00:28:14.630
a Bzon from the Higs field. So maybe you
00:28:14.640 --> 00:28:16.549
need to create a graviton from the
00:28:16.559 --> 00:28:18.389
gravity field which we're used to
00:28:18.399 --> 00:28:18.950
talking about
00:28:18.960 --> 00:28:21.110
>> and some kind of particle to account for
00:28:21.120 --> 00:28:22.950
dark matter and so
00:28:22.960 --> 00:28:24.950
>> well that's right. Yes. Yeah. Well dark
00:28:24.960 --> 00:28:27.990
matter would probably be a firm on a
00:28:28.000 --> 00:28:29.750
thing that you know is a matter particle
00:28:29.760 --> 00:28:31.750
rather than a force particle.
00:28:31.760 --> 00:28:34.870
>> Okay. Gotcha. Fair enough. All right. Uh
00:28:34.880 --> 00:28:37.590
so where does a light particle fit in
00:28:37.600 --> 00:28:38.389
that? A photon.
00:28:38.399 --> 00:28:39.909
>> Uh that's the photon. Yeah. It's a
00:28:39.919 --> 00:28:42.070
gravitational it's the electromagnetic
00:28:42.080 --> 00:28:43.750
particle. That's pro probably the best
00:28:43.760 --> 00:28:46.710
understood of of the subatomic particles
00:28:46.720 --> 00:28:48.789
because we use it all the time.
00:28:48.799 --> 00:28:50.470
>> We're using it as we speak.
00:28:50.480 --> 00:28:53.510
>> We are. It's very It's very handy.
00:28:53.520 --> 00:28:55.510
>> It's very handy. Yeah. I found it quite
00:28:55.520 --> 00:28:57.029
useful recently.
00:28:57.039 --> 00:28:58.549
>> Good. Very
00:28:58.559 --> 00:29:00.710
>> You probably find the strong and weak
00:29:00.720 --> 00:29:02.310
nuclear forces quite useful as well
00:29:02.320 --> 00:29:04.950
because they stop you falling to bits.
00:29:04.960 --> 00:29:07.669
>> That's a good one. Keep that in mind.
00:29:07.679 --> 00:29:09.269
>> Yeah, I think that's even more useful
00:29:09.279 --> 00:29:11.590
than photon. Really? The problem with
00:29:11.600 --> 00:29:13.750
all of this, Fred, is none of it gives
00:29:13.760 --> 00:29:15.750
me anything to work with to improve my
00:29:15.760 --> 00:29:18.310
golf game. So,
00:29:18.320 --> 00:29:21.669
>> uh, yeah. Well, you've got to start with
00:29:21.679 --> 00:29:24.230
the notion that five irons don't float.
00:29:24.240 --> 00:29:27.350
And once you've got past that step, then
00:29:27.360 --> 00:29:29.190
>> you were getting some book plugs in
00:29:29.200 --> 00:29:30.789
today.
00:29:30.799 --> 00:29:33.669
>> That's one for you. Thank you very much.
00:29:33.679 --> 00:29:35.750
Uh, thank you, Russ. I I hope we covered
00:29:35.760 --> 00:29:37.590
that. I think we did. Not sure, but
00:29:37.600 --> 00:29:39.990
anyway. Um, it it's a work in progress.
00:29:40.000 --> 00:29:42.310
We'll call it that. Uh our final
00:29:42.320 --> 00:29:45.269
question today uh comes from Robert. He
00:29:45.279 --> 00:29:47.110
said, "Hi, my friends down under. I live
00:29:47.120 --> 00:29:50.230
in Areri, Iceland,
00:29:50.240 --> 00:29:52.710
and I'm very much looking forward uh to
00:29:52.720 --> 00:29:54.549
the eclipses this year in the western
00:29:54.559 --> 00:29:58.310
part of Iceland. However, um your recent
00:29:58.320 --> 00:30:00.470
fabulous show regarding Olympus bonds on
00:30:00.480 --> 00:30:02.630
Mars, would this make a perfect
00:30:02.640 --> 00:30:06.470
candidate for a space elevator?" Uh that
00:30:06.480 --> 00:30:08.389
comes from Robert. Hello, Robert. Thanks
00:30:08.399 --> 00:30:10.070
for uh sending your question in
00:30:10.080 --> 00:30:12.230
Arerrera. You've been there.
00:30:12.240 --> 00:30:14.310
>> I have. Yes. I sent you some photographs
00:30:14.320 --> 00:30:16.470
so you could see what it's like. Uh we
00:30:16.480 --> 00:30:18.870
should put them up on the website if
00:30:18.880 --> 00:30:20.470
>> we could post them on in the Space Nuts
00:30:20.480 --> 00:30:21.510
podcast group.
00:30:21.520 --> 00:30:23.590
>> That would be nice. All right. One of
00:30:23.600 --> 00:30:25.830
the main street main and me in the main
00:30:25.840 --> 00:30:27.510
street in Akaria. We were there at this
00:30:27.520 --> 00:30:30.070
time last year actually. Okay. Uh
00:30:30.080 --> 00:30:32.870
Robert. So um I'm sorry I didn't know
00:30:32.880 --> 00:30:34.389
you then or else we'd have looked you
00:30:34.399 --> 00:30:36.630
up. But we had a great time there. It
00:30:36.640 --> 00:30:39.909
was part of our our ice land tour which
00:30:39.919 --> 00:30:41.669
was not the best for weather. So, we
00:30:41.679 --> 00:30:44.549
didn't see any aori, but uh certainly
00:30:44.559 --> 00:30:47.430
experienced some really fabulous
00:30:47.440 --> 00:30:49.110
landscapes up in the northwest of
00:30:49.120 --> 00:30:50.789
Iceland. It was the first our first
00:30:50.799 --> 00:30:52.710
visit up to the northwest. We spent a
00:30:52.720 --> 00:30:54.149
lot of time in the south on previous
00:30:54.159 --> 00:30:57.830
trips, but uh yeah, Aari such a stunning
00:30:57.840 --> 00:30:59.669
place. Beautiful scenery.
00:30:59.679 --> 00:31:01.510
>> They they love their cathedrals, don't
00:31:01.520 --> 00:31:04.389
they? In Iceland, the churches, gee,
00:31:04.399 --> 00:31:06.389
they're amazing. The one the one we saw
00:31:06.399 --> 00:31:08.789
in Rekuik just blew my mind.
00:31:08.799 --> 00:31:10.549
>> That's right. That's that's the classic
00:31:10.559 --> 00:31:13.269
one. That is such an elegant building.
00:31:13.279 --> 00:31:13.669
It is.
00:31:13.679 --> 00:31:15.590
>> And indeed the church in Nakureri is
00:31:15.600 --> 00:31:16.230
lovely as well.
00:31:16.240 --> 00:31:17.990
>> It is. Yeah, you got a photo of that
00:31:18.000 --> 00:31:21.110
one. Yeah, I'll post that too.
00:31:21.120 --> 00:31:25.430
>> Uh what was the question again? Oh yeah.
00:31:25.440 --> 00:31:28.549
>> As a good platform for a space elevator.
00:31:28.559 --> 00:31:34.950
Um the yes um there's a kind of problem
00:31:34.960 --> 00:31:39.350
because to make a space elevator stable
00:31:39.360 --> 00:31:43.110
uh it has to start off from a point on
00:31:43.120 --> 00:31:45.830
the equator of whatever world you're
00:31:45.840 --> 00:31:48.950
trying to get up into space from. Right.
00:31:48.960 --> 00:31:52.630
And Olympus Mons, I am told, is at
00:31:52.640 --> 00:31:57.430
latitude 18° north. In fact, it's 18° 39
00:31:57.440 --> 00:31:59.190
minutes north, which is not the equator
00:31:59.200 --> 00:32:02.310
of Mars. So, you'd have problems with
00:32:02.320 --> 00:32:04.149
it. Uh, it would need to stretch and
00:32:04.159 --> 00:32:06.870
shrink uh and I think would probably
00:32:06.880 --> 00:32:09.830
shake itself to pieces. So, uh I think
00:32:09.840 --> 00:32:11.909
you've got to have the equator. So
00:32:11.919 --> 00:32:14.870
that's a bit sad because Olympus Mons as
00:32:14.880 --> 00:32:19.750
um as Robert is hinting at uh is um you
00:32:19.760 --> 00:32:21.990
know it's high enough that you kind of
00:32:22.000 --> 00:32:24.070
already you're already out.
00:32:24.080 --> 00:32:25.430
>> Well, you're already Yeah, you're
00:32:25.440 --> 00:32:27.350
already on the way up your space
00:32:27.360 --> 00:32:29.909
elevator. So, a nice idea. Very nice
00:32:29.919 --> 00:32:31.909
idea, but I don't think it would work.
00:32:31.919 --> 00:32:35.509
>> That's a pity. Well, I I suspect that uh
00:32:35.519 --> 00:32:38.710
the space elevator concept's probably
00:32:38.720 --> 00:32:40.149
not ever going to happen. And it just
00:32:40.159 --> 00:32:41.750
sounds like it's too expensive, too
00:32:41.760 --> 00:32:43.269
hard, and there are easier ways to do
00:32:43.279 --> 00:32:44.549
things.
00:32:44.559 --> 00:32:46.070
>> Yeah. Well, that's right. Reusable
00:32:46.080 --> 00:32:48.230
boosters is the way to do it. And uh as
00:32:48.240 --> 00:32:49.909
we talked about in the last show, that's
00:32:49.919 --> 00:32:52.230
now basically the normal way of getting
00:32:52.240 --> 00:32:53.990
into space.
00:32:54.000 --> 00:32:55.669
>> Very much so, Robert. Great to hear from
00:32:55.679 --> 00:32:58.389
you. Enjoy those eclipses later this
00:32:58.399 --> 00:33:00.630
year. Uh yeah, that that'll be very
00:33:00.640 --> 00:33:02.149
exciting in Iceland if you can get
00:33:02.159 --> 00:33:05.830
there. Uh be a lot of fun, too. Um so,
00:33:05.840 --> 00:33:07.669
Robert, hopefully we answered your
00:33:07.679 --> 00:33:09.590
question. It was an easy one as it turns
00:33:09.600 --> 00:33:11.669
out. U and that brings us to an end.
00:33:11.679 --> 00:33:13.029
Don't forget if you've got questions for
00:33:13.039 --> 00:33:14.870
us, please send them in. We we're
00:33:14.880 --> 00:33:16.789
actually quite desperately short of
00:33:16.799 --> 00:33:19.110
questions. So, uh send them to us via
00:33:19.120 --> 00:33:21.269
our website spacenutspodcast.com.
00:33:21.279 --> 00:33:22.870
spacenuts.io
00:33:22.880 --> 00:33:25.909
or just do a search for spaceodcast on
00:33:25.919 --> 00:33:27.750
your favorite search engine. Click on
00:33:27.760 --> 00:33:30.070
the AMA button that is ask me anything
00:33:30.080 --> 00:33:31.909
and send your text and audio questions
00:33:31.919 --> 00:33:34.630
in with your name and location. We would
00:33:34.640 --> 00:33:36.950
really love to hear from you. Fred,
00:33:36.960 --> 00:33:38.549
we're all done. Thank you so much. It
00:33:38.559 --> 00:33:39.909
was good fun today.
00:33:39.919 --> 00:33:41.190
>> Yeah, it's been great.
00:33:41.200 --> 00:33:42.630
>> Oh, it's never It's never fun any other
00:33:42.640 --> 00:33:45.350
time, but it was good fun today.
00:33:45.360 --> 00:33:47.509
>> I love connecting with our listeners.
00:33:47.519 --> 00:33:49.590
It's especially when they're in places
00:33:49.600 --> 00:33:51.269
like Arureri.
00:33:51.279 --> 00:33:53.029
>> Yeah. Yeah. What a what an amazing
00:33:53.039 --> 00:33:55.590
place. See you soon, Fred.
00:33:55.600 --> 00:33:56.789
>> Cheers for now.
00:33:56.799 --> 00:33:58.389
>> Professor Fred Watson, astronomer at
00:33:58.399 --> 00:34:00.789
large, part of the team here at Space
00:34:00.799 --> 00:34:03.110
Nuts. And uh thanks to Hugh in the
00:34:03.120 --> 00:34:05.029
studio, uh works really hard, but he
00:34:05.039 --> 00:34:06.389
couldn't be with us today. He got on a
00:34:06.399 --> 00:34:08.470
space elevator and he thought he'd be
00:34:08.480 --> 00:34:10.629
back in time, but some kid pushed all
00:34:10.639 --> 00:34:14.230
the buttons. So, he was he was very
00:34:14.240 --> 00:34:16.790
angry. Anyway, he sent me a text. Uh,
00:34:16.800 --> 00:34:18.710
and from me, Andrew Dunley, thanks for
00:34:18.720 --> 00:34:20.069
your company. We'll catch you on the
00:34:20.079 --> 00:34:22.310
next episode of Space Nuts. Bye-bye.
00:34:22.320 --> 00:34:23.349
>> Space Nuts.
00:34:23.359 --> 00:34:25.430
>> You'll be listening to the Space Nuts
00:34:25.440 --> 00:34:27.669
podcast
00:34:27.679 --> 00:34:30.629
>> available at Apple Podcasts, Spotify,
00:34:30.639 --> 00:34:33.349
iHeart Radio, or your favorite podcast
00:34:33.359 --> 00:34:35.750
player. You can also stream on demand at
00:34:35.760 --> 00:34:38.629
byes.com. This has been another quality
00:34:38.639 --> 00:34:43.079
podcast production from byes.com.