Black Holes, Gravity Theories & the Quest for Planet Nine | Space Nuts: Astronomy Insights &...
Sponsor Details:
NordVPN - This episode brought to you with the support of NordVPN...the official Sapce Nuts VPN service. To grab your special deal as mentioned on the show, head over to www.nordvpn.com/spacenuts (
https://www.nordvpn.com/spacenuts)
and click on 'Get the Deal'. Use the coupon code SpaceNuts at checkout...and it all comes with a 30 day money back guarantee.
Unraveling the Cosmos: Black Holes, Gravity Theories, and Planet Nine
In this thought-provoking Q&A episode of Space Nuts, host Andrew Dunkley and the ever-insightful Professor Fred Watson dive into a variety of compelling questions from listeners. They tackle the intriguing concept of the universe potentially being born inside a black hole, explore a new theory of gravity, and discuss the ongoing search for the elusive Planet Nine.
Episode Highlights:
- The Universe Inside a Black Hole: Listener Ash from Brisbane poses a fascinating question about the possibility of our universe being trapped inside a black hole and the implications of such a theory. Andrew and Fred Watson discuss the mechanics of black holes and what it would mean for our existence.
- A New Gravity Theory: Casey from Colorado asks about the latest advancements in gravity theories, prompting a discussion on the unification of quantum field theory and relativity, and the potential breakthroughs from Finnish researchers that could reshape our understanding of gravity.
- Understanding Hubble Tension: The duo explains the concept of Hubble tension, highlighting the discrepancies between two methods of measuring the universe's expansion rate and what this could mean for cosmology.
- The Quest for Planet Nine: Simon from New South Wales raises questions about the search for Planet Nine and the methods used to detect it, while Joe from Washington inquires about the limits of gravitational assists for interstellar travel, leading to a discussion on the practicality of such missions.
For more Space Nuts, including our continually updating newsfeed and to listen to all our episodes, visit our website. (
https://www.spacenutspodcast.com/)
Follow us on social media at SpaceNutsPod on Facebook, X, YouTube Music, Tumblr, Instagram, and TikTok. We love engaging with our community, so be sure to drop us a message or comment on your favourite platform.
If you’d like to help support Space Nuts and join our growing family of insiders for commercial-free episodes and more, visit spacenutspodcast.com/about (
https://www.spacenutspodcast.com/about)
Stay curious, keep looking up, and join us next time for more stellar insights and cosmic wonders. Until then, clear skies and happy stargazing.
(00:00) Welcome to Space Nuts with Andrew Dunkley and Fred Watson Watson
(01:20) Discussion on the universe inside a black hole
(15:00) New theory of gravity from Finnish researchers
(25:30) Explaining Hubble tension
(35:00) The search for Planet Nine and gravitational assists
For commercial-free versions of Space Nuts, join us on Patreon, Supercast, Apple Podcasts, or become a supporter here:
https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/space-nuts-astronomy-insights-cosmic-discoveries--2631155/support
(
https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/space-nuts-astronomy-insights-cosmic-discoveries--2631155/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss)
.
Episode link: https://play.headliner.app/episode/27188974?utm_source=youtube
00:00 - Welcome to Space Nuts with Andrew Dunkley and Fred Watson Watson
01:20 - Discussion on the universe inside a black hole
15:00 - New theory of gravity from Finnish researchers
25:30 - Explaining Hubble tension
Kind: captions
Language: en
00:00:00.160 --> 00:00:01.910
Hi there. Thanks for joining us. This is
00:00:01.920 --> 00:00:04.550
a Q&A edition of Space Nuts. My name is
00:00:04.560 --> 00:00:06.470
Andrew Dunley. It's good to have your
00:00:06.480 --> 00:00:09.990
company. Uh today, uh we will be hearing
00:00:10.000 --> 00:00:12.950
questions about uh the universe being
00:00:12.960 --> 00:00:15.030
inside a black hole. In fact, I think
00:00:15.040 --> 00:00:16.870
they're suggesting it was born in a
00:00:16.880 --> 00:00:19.189
black hole and is stuck in there and how
00:00:19.199 --> 00:00:21.510
do we get out? Uh we'll also be looking
00:00:21.520 --> 00:00:23.910
at a new gravity theory uh theory,
00:00:23.920 --> 00:00:26.630
Hubble tension. Not surprisingly,
00:00:26.640 --> 00:00:28.870
questions about planet 9 with the most
00:00:28.880 --> 00:00:30.710
recent announcement of something being
00:00:30.720 --> 00:00:34.630
out there that's not planet 9 and um
00:00:34.640 --> 00:00:37.830
getting gravity assistance to max delta
00:00:37.840 --> 00:00:40.470
v. Those are all the questions coming up
00:00:40.480 --> 00:00:43.510
on this episode of Space Nuts. 15
00:00:43.520 --> 00:00:47.910
seconds. Guidance is internal. 10 9
00:00:47.920 --> 00:00:51.830
ignition sequence start. Space nuts. 5 4
00:00:51.840 --> 00:00:56.630
3 2 1 2 3 4 5 5 4 3 2 1 Space Nuts.
00:00:56.640 --> 00:00:59.510
Astronauts report. It feels good. And
00:00:59.520 --> 00:01:01.910
Fred Watson is with us again to solve
00:01:01.920 --> 00:01:03.990
all these little riddles. Hello, Fred.
00:01:04.000 --> 00:01:06.149
Hello, Andrew. Nice to um help me solve
00:01:06.159 --> 00:01:09.109
the riddles.
00:01:09.119 --> 00:01:11.750
I don't know anything.
00:01:11.760 --> 00:01:13.350
That's why I bring you along. Oh, good.
00:01:13.360 --> 00:01:14.789
Well, I might like to be of assistance.
00:01:14.799 --> 00:01:16.390
Makes it so much more interesting when
00:01:16.400 --> 00:01:18.310
there's two people talking. Monologues
00:01:18.320 --> 00:01:20.310
are just so boring, don't you reckon?
00:01:20.320 --> 00:01:22.710
Uh,
00:01:22.720 --> 00:01:24.550
unless unless it's a super interesting
00:01:24.560 --> 00:01:26.950
person person like yourself. Right. No,
00:01:26.960 --> 00:01:29.030
I'm I'm capable of boring the pants off
00:01:29.040 --> 00:01:31.429
people as uh people have assured me
00:01:31.439 --> 00:01:33.950
before. So, that's all
00:01:33.960 --> 00:01:36.149
right. So, we've got a lot to get
00:01:36.159 --> 00:01:39.109
through and uh it's it's even trickier
00:01:39.119 --> 00:01:41.429
this week because we do have a technical
00:01:41.439 --> 00:01:43.910
uh issue which means you are going to
00:01:43.920 --> 00:01:45.469
have to
00:01:45.479 --> 00:01:48.149
lipre. Okay.
00:01:48.159 --> 00:01:52.149
Uh, so right, I'll do my best. We'll see
00:01:52.159 --> 00:01:53.510
how that goes. Wondering where the lips
00:01:53.520 --> 00:01:55.350
are going to be. That's the only thing.
00:01:55.360 --> 00:01:57.510
Yes. Yes. Well, the first set of lips
00:01:57.520 --> 00:02:00.469
come from Paul. So, let's hear his
00:02:00.479 --> 00:02:03.749
question. Good day, Fred, Andrew, Jonty,
00:02:03.759 --> 00:02:05.270
Heidi, whoever happens to be at the
00:02:05.280 --> 00:02:07.749
helm. Uh, this is Paul from sunny Bris
00:02:07.759 --> 00:02:09.830
Vegas. Uh, thanks for doing a great job
00:02:09.840 --> 00:02:12.470
as always. I have a quick question about
00:02:12.480 --> 00:02:16.390
surprise black holes. Um, Dr. Shamir put
00:02:16.400 --> 00:02:18.270
out a paper recently
00:02:18.280 --> 00:02:22.430
about his ideas regarding the fact that
00:02:22.440 --> 00:02:25.510
some galaxies are spinning one way and a
00:02:25.520 --> 00:02:28.070
lot of them most of them the other way.
00:02:28.080 --> 00:02:30.229
And another fellow chipped in a Nicadan
00:02:30.239 --> 00:02:33.589
Poploski from uh New Haven suggested
00:02:33.599 --> 00:02:35.270
that maybe that was because our universe
00:02:35.280 --> 00:02:38.470
was born inside a black hole. If that is
00:02:38.480 --> 00:02:42.150
true, how the heck did we get out? And
00:02:42.160 --> 00:02:44.670
if we didn't get out and we're still
00:02:44.680 --> 00:02:47.910
inside, then how is that possible given
00:02:47.920 --> 00:02:49.110
that, you know, anything that goes
00:02:49.120 --> 00:02:53.110
inside a black hole uh is spaghettified
00:02:53.120 --> 00:02:55.270
according to our current thinking and
00:02:55.280 --> 00:02:57.110
therefore incoherent? I mean, I know I'm
00:02:57.120 --> 00:02:59.270
incoherent, but you know what I'm
00:02:59.280 --> 00:03:01.110
talking about when it comes to ordinary
00:03:01.120 --> 00:03:04.550
barionic matter. Uh, love to get your
00:03:04.560 --> 00:03:05.630
thoughts on
00:03:05.640 --> 00:03:08.869
this. Anyway, uh, keep up the good work
00:03:08.879 --> 00:03:12.149
and catch us later. Cheers. Thank you,
00:03:12.159 --> 00:03:14.390
Paul, and hope all is well. In Brisbane,
00:03:14.400 --> 00:03:16.630
Paul is asking about the universe being
00:03:16.640 --> 00:03:19.589
born inside a black hole. How do we get
00:03:19.599 --> 00:03:22.309
out and why don't we get spaghettified
00:03:22.319 --> 00:03:25.190
as a consequence of that amongst many
00:03:25.200 --> 00:03:27.589
other things, but uh that was the basis
00:03:27.599 --> 00:03:29.670
of the question. So, yes. So, as as
00:03:29.680 --> 00:03:31.430
you've uh already mentioned, I didn't
00:03:31.440 --> 00:03:33.910
hear any of Paul's question there. Not
00:03:33.920 --> 00:03:36.470
at all. However, I did uh listen to it
00:03:36.480 --> 00:03:38.470
yesterday, so I've got a bit of an idea
00:03:38.480 --> 00:03:40.229
of what Paul was suggesting. the fact
00:03:40.239 --> 00:03:44.789
that um we have uh new observations
00:03:44.799 --> 00:03:46.789
which uh have been made with the James
00:03:46.799 --> 00:03:49.270
Web Space Telescope
00:03:49.280 --> 00:03:53.270
uh that um are intriguing in the sense
00:03:53.280 --> 00:03:57.750
that uh these scientists uh and they um
00:03:57.760 --> 00:04:00.869
are basically uh mostly located at
00:04:00.879 --> 00:04:02.190
Kansas State
00:04:02.200 --> 00:04:05.190
University. Uh that the rotation of
00:04:05.200 --> 00:04:07.589
galaxies in the deep universe isn't
00:04:07.599 --> 00:04:10.949
random. uh you'd expect, you know,
00:04:10.959 --> 00:04:13.869
galaxies to be rotating
00:04:13.879 --> 00:04:16.390
in they can only go one way or the
00:04:16.400 --> 00:04:18.469
other, but you would expect an equal
00:04:18.479 --> 00:04:22.950
balance of rotations. Uh and uh what we
00:04:22.960 --> 00:04:26.230
find uh or what these scientists find at
00:04:26.240 --> 00:04:29.189
Kansas State University using the James
00:04:29.199 --> 00:04:32.310
Web Space Telescope Advanced Deep
00:04:32.320 --> 00:04:35.590
Extragalactic Survey or JADES um what
00:04:35.600 --> 00:04:40.150
they find is out of 263 galaxies
00:04:40.160 --> 00:04:43.590
um which you know which sort of give
00:04:43.600 --> 00:04:45.350
away their rotation because we know that
00:04:45.360 --> 00:04:47.590
spiral arms nearly always trail. There's
00:04:47.600 --> 00:04:49.110
at least one galaxy where the spiral
00:04:49.120 --> 00:04:51.469
arms are leading, but most of them
00:04:51.479 --> 00:04:53.909
trail. And what they find that out of
00:04:53.919 --> 00:04:57.990
these 263 galaxies, about 2/3 of them
00:04:58.000 --> 00:05:00.390
are going clockwise and the rest are
00:05:00.400 --> 00:05:02.550
going anticlockwise. And that is an
00:05:02.560 --> 00:05:04.390
imbalance. That's a statistically
00:05:04.400 --> 00:05:07.510
significant imbalance. Uh that suggests
00:05:07.520 --> 00:05:09.270
that something's going on that we don't
00:05:09.280 --> 00:05:13.070
understand. And that leads to the
00:05:13.080 --> 00:05:16.029
possibility that perhaps the universe
00:05:16.039 --> 00:05:18.270
itself is
00:05:18.280 --> 00:05:22.110
rotating. Um, and I've seen other um,
00:05:22.120 --> 00:05:24.790
papers on this topic that suggest that
00:05:24.800 --> 00:05:27.029
maybe the universe rotates once in every
00:05:27.039 --> 00:05:29.590
500 billion years. That's one figure
00:05:29.600 --> 00:05:33.189
that I've seen. Now, um, a consequence
00:05:33.199 --> 00:05:35.670
of the rotating universe, and I think
00:05:35.680 --> 00:05:37.830
this is where Paul's question went. I'm
00:05:37.840 --> 00:05:39.390
trying to remember having heard it
00:05:39.400 --> 00:05:44.150
yesterday. Uh is that uh it it lends
00:05:44.160 --> 00:05:47.029
some weight to the idea that the
00:05:47.039 --> 00:05:51.270
universe is inside a black hole. Uh in
00:05:51.280 --> 00:05:52.790
other words, that there is an event
00:05:52.800 --> 00:05:56.310
horizon at some huge distance from where
00:05:56.320 --> 00:06:00.150
we are. Uh and we are all within this
00:06:00.160 --> 00:06:01.390
black
00:06:01.400 --> 00:06:05.029
hole. Um what does that mean for
00:06:05.039 --> 00:06:07.830
observational cosmology? I suspect it's
00:06:07.840 --> 00:06:10.629
going to be very difficult for us to
00:06:10.639 --> 00:06:15.670
confirm that ever. Uh and I think um you
00:06:15.680 --> 00:06:18.950
know this is speculative research. It's
00:06:18.960 --> 00:06:21.189
important research because you you you
00:06:21.199 --> 00:06:23.830
want to know um how some of these things
00:06:23.840 --> 00:06:25.590
interact. And I might just mention and I
00:06:25.600 --> 00:06:27.270
think we've discussed this before Andrew
00:06:27.280 --> 00:06:29.350
on space notes that the idea of a
00:06:29.360 --> 00:06:32.469
rotating universe actually relieves some
00:06:32.479 --> 00:06:35.909
of the issues uh that we find uh in
00:06:35.919 --> 00:06:37.270
observing the universe. One of them is
00:06:37.280 --> 00:06:38.870
the Hubble tension and I know there's a
00:06:38.880 --> 00:06:41.749
question coming up about that. Um so a
00:06:41.759 --> 00:06:43.430
rotating universe has certainly
00:06:43.440 --> 00:06:45.350
attractive possibilities but we
00:06:45.360 --> 00:06:47.749
absolutely don't know whether it is a
00:06:47.759 --> 00:06:49.590
rotating universe and indeed whether
00:06:49.600 --> 00:06:51.110
that means that we're inside a black
00:06:51.120 --> 00:06:53.029
hole. Uh so what I was going to say was
00:06:53.039 --> 00:06:54.550
the idea of a universe within a black
00:06:54.560 --> 00:06:57.270
hole is akin to the idea of multiverses.
00:06:57.280 --> 00:07:00.390
The the idea that um um multiple
00:07:00.400 --> 00:07:03.029
universes exist and we are just one of
00:07:03.039 --> 00:07:05.589
them. Uh I'm not really I don't think
00:07:05.599 --> 00:07:07.510
giving a sensible answer to Paul's
00:07:07.520 --> 00:07:08.950
question partly because I couldn't hear
00:07:08.960 --> 00:07:11.589
it but I think he was basically asking
00:07:11.599 --> 00:07:13.350
you know what happens how does it
00:07:13.360 --> 00:07:15.710
happen? Uh how are we not being
00:07:15.720 --> 00:07:18.469
spaghettified? That's because uh I can
00:07:18.479 --> 00:07:20.150
tell you the answer to that. uh we're
00:07:20.160 --> 00:07:22.790
we're not in a region um of the black
00:07:22.800 --> 00:07:26.110
hole where the um
00:07:26.120 --> 00:07:27.629
gravitational
00:07:27.639 --> 00:07:31.510
gravitational pull is changing very very
00:07:31.520 --> 00:07:34.390
rapidly with space and that's what makes
00:07:34.400 --> 00:07:36.390
a black hole spaghettify you. You go
00:07:36.400 --> 00:07:37.990
from one point to another and your
00:07:38.000 --> 00:07:39.670
gravitational pull is very different. So
00:07:39.680 --> 00:07:41.270
your head feels a different gravity from
00:07:41.280 --> 00:07:43.189
your feet and you get spaghettified.
00:07:43.199 --> 00:07:45.670
We're not in a in a place where that
00:07:45.680 --> 00:07:47.909
would be happening if we were inside a
00:07:47.919 --> 00:07:50.629
black hole. But, you know, all bets are
00:07:50.639 --> 00:07:53.270
off because inside a black hole, uh,
00:07:53.280 --> 00:07:54.950
there might we we're in a different
00:07:54.960 --> 00:07:56.710
dimensional space. A black hole is a
00:07:56.720 --> 00:07:58.950
singularity. Are we in a singularity? A
00:07:58.960 --> 00:08:01.070
singularity is a point with no
00:08:01.080 --> 00:08:03.510
dimensions. Work that one out. So, we'd
00:08:03.520 --> 00:08:05.270
have to be almost in a different
00:08:05.280 --> 00:08:07.510
dimensional space. So, it's a
00:08:07.520 --> 00:08:10.230
interesting question. um to which I
00:08:10.240 --> 00:08:12.469
don't think anybody knows the answer,
00:08:12.479 --> 00:08:13.749
but there are a few people who are
00:08:13.759 --> 00:08:15.189
probably thinking through it a lot more
00:08:15.199 --> 00:08:18.710
clearly than I am. Well, Paul mentioned
00:08:18.720 --> 00:08:22.950
a physicist by the name of Nicodemus.
00:08:22.960 --> 00:08:25.670
Uh he he's one that's put this theory
00:08:25.680 --> 00:08:28.469
forward that um our observable
00:08:28.479 --> 00:08:30.550
observable universe is not just a part
00:08:30.560 --> 00:08:33.110
of a larger universe, but is in fact the
00:08:33.120 --> 00:08:35.909
interior of a black hole within a larger
00:08:35.919 --> 00:08:37.350
context. Yes. So you've got extra
00:08:37.360 --> 00:08:39.909
dimensions somewhere out there uh within
00:08:39.919 --> 00:08:44.790
which we exist. Uh that's right. It's um
00:08:44.800 --> 00:08:47.030
you know I I Yes. I remember um checking
00:08:47.040 --> 00:08:49.269
out the the researchers that that Paul
00:08:49.279 --> 00:08:51.670
mentioned yesterday when I looked at it.
00:08:51.680 --> 00:08:54.630
Uh it's interesting stuff. Yeah. What do
00:08:54.640 --> 00:08:56.710
you think personally? I mean is there
00:08:56.720 --> 00:09:00.310
any possibility that this could be real?
00:09:00.320 --> 00:09:03.350
Um it to me it's on the same level as
00:09:03.360 --> 00:09:06.710
does heaven exist? uh you know it's it's
00:09:06.720 --> 00:09:09.910
questions to which we really can't find
00:09:09.920 --> 00:09:12.550
answers. We can theorize, we can
00:09:12.560 --> 00:09:14.710
conjecture, we can speculate, we can
00:09:14.720 --> 00:09:17.030
write equations down and probably some
00:09:17.040 --> 00:09:18.630
of the equations do support the idea
00:09:18.640 --> 00:09:20.470
that we're within a within an event
00:09:20.480 --> 00:09:22.310
horizon. It goes back a very long way.
00:09:22.320 --> 00:09:26.070
It's not a new idea at all. Um but um I
00:09:26.080 --> 00:09:28.230
mean people have put new numbers on it I
00:09:28.240 --> 00:09:30.470
think and new observations. I think we
00:09:30.480 --> 00:09:32.550
we watch this space. Next time this
00:09:32.560 --> 00:09:33.990
question comes up, I might be able to
00:09:34.000 --> 00:09:35.430
hear it properly and might be able to
00:09:35.440 --> 00:09:38.790
give a more cogent answer.
00:09:38.800 --> 00:09:40.550
Yes, indeed. I'll be working on that
00:09:40.560 --> 00:09:42.389
technicality. I don't I'm sure it's not
00:09:42.399 --> 00:09:43.829
your fault, Andrew. I know what these
00:09:43.839 --> 00:09:45.590
gremlins are like. We get them all the
00:09:45.600 --> 00:09:48.870
time. Yeah. I blame the equipment. Never
00:09:48.880 --> 00:09:51.509
ever though. Never the police. That's
00:09:51.519 --> 00:09:53.910
right.
00:09:53.920 --> 00:09:55.590
Thank you, Paul. Hope we covered that
00:09:55.600 --> 00:09:57.990
adequately as we strive to do here on
00:09:58.000 --> 00:10:00.550
Space Nuts.
00:10:00.560 --> 00:10:02.389
Let's take a little break from the show
00:10:02.399 --> 00:10:04.829
to tell you about our sponsor
00:10:04.839 --> 00:10:07.990
NordVPN. Now, I've told you about uh
00:10:08.000 --> 00:10:09.829
virtual private networks many, many
00:10:09.839 --> 00:10:12.829
times. I use them myself. In fact, I use
00:10:12.839 --> 00:10:16.870
NordVPN and I did pay for it, so I feel
00:10:16.880 --> 00:10:18.790
even more qualified to tell you what I
00:10:18.800 --> 00:10:20.829
think. And I've used it overseas
00:10:20.839 --> 00:10:23.750
recently and it works. It's one of the
00:10:23.760 --> 00:10:26.870
most trusted and widely used VPN
00:10:26.880 --> 00:10:28.870
services in the world. And for a very
00:10:28.880 --> 00:10:31.829
good reason. It encrypts your data. It
00:10:31.839 --> 00:10:34.790
hides your IP address. It makes you much
00:10:34.800 --> 00:10:37.750
harder uh to find online from anybody
00:10:37.760 --> 00:10:39.990
trying to steal your passwords, steal
00:10:40.000 --> 00:10:42.710
your usernames, sell them on the dark
00:10:42.720 --> 00:10:44.630
web, or just get into your bank accounts
00:10:44.640 --> 00:10:46.150
and clean you out. Whatever their
00:10:46.160 --> 00:10:49.110
motivation, it's not usually very good
00:10:49.120 --> 00:10:51.990
for you if they succeed. But the way to
00:10:52.000 --> 00:10:55.430
protect yourself is with NordVPN, top
00:10:55.440 --> 00:10:57.829
tier security. And we're talking about
00:10:57.839 --> 00:11:00.150
the same standard of security trusted by
00:11:00.160 --> 00:11:02.550
governments and cyber security experts.
00:11:02.560 --> 00:11:04.630
Uh they have a global network. They've
00:11:04.640 --> 00:11:07.430
got uh thousands of servers in over 60
00:11:07.440 --> 00:11:11.509
countries around the planet and no geo
00:11:11.519 --> 00:11:13.430
restrictions as a consequence of that.
00:11:13.440 --> 00:11:16.230
And very fast speeds. In fact, I have
00:11:16.240 --> 00:11:18.550
actually experienced higher speeds
00:11:18.560 --> 00:11:22.230
connected to my VPN at home compared to
00:11:22.240 --> 00:11:24.790
what I'd normally get from my internet
00:11:24.800 --> 00:11:27.110
service provider. I don't know how that
00:11:27.120 --> 00:11:29.190
happens, but uh it certainly has
00:11:29.200 --> 00:11:31.350
happened a few times. They have a strict
00:11:31.360 --> 00:11:33.509
no logs policy, which means they don't
00:11:33.519 --> 00:11:36.150
track or store your browsing history.
00:11:36.160 --> 00:11:37.910
And they offer all sorts of other tools
00:11:37.920 --> 00:11:40.310
like threat protection, dark web
00:11:40.320 --> 00:11:43.509
monitoring, and a kill switch for added
00:11:43.519 --> 00:11:45.670
safety. Now, if you'd like to find out
00:11:45.680 --> 00:11:48.550
more, there are discounts at the moment
00:11:48.560 --> 00:11:50.630
for Space Nuts listeners. And it's
00:11:50.640 --> 00:11:56.590
really quite simple. Just go to
00:11:56.600 --> 00:12:01.630
nordvpn.com/spacenuts. That's
00:12:01.640 --> 00:12:03.350
nordvpn.com/spacenuts. And then you
00:12:03.360 --> 00:12:05.350
click get the deal. Don't forget they've
00:12:05.360 --> 00:12:07.990
got a 30-day money back guarantee. And
00:12:08.000 --> 00:12:10.389
you can get an extra four months free by
00:12:10.399 --> 00:12:12.470
signing up as a Space Nuts listener. So,
00:12:12.480 --> 00:12:14.790
click on get the deal. They have uh
00:12:14.800 --> 00:12:16.629
plans that you can pay monthly or you
00:12:16.639 --> 00:12:19.269
can go a year in advance or two years in
00:12:19.279 --> 00:12:21.430
advance. And the longer you sign up with
00:12:21.440 --> 00:12:24.069
them, the better the discounts. So, go
00:12:24.079 --> 00:12:26.190
to
00:12:26.200 --> 00:12:28.069
nordvpn.com/spacenuts for your online
00:12:28.079 --> 00:12:30.389
security today. And don't forget the uh
00:12:30.399 --> 00:12:32.069
the code word spacen nuts at the
00:12:32.079 --> 00:12:35.550
checkout.
00:12:35.560 --> 00:12:37.350
nordvpn.com/spacenuts. Click get the
00:12:37.360 --> 00:12:39.430
deal and then have a look and see what
00:12:39.440 --> 00:12:43.430
suits you best. Now, back to the show.
00:12:43.440 --> 00:12:46.389
And I feel space nuts. Uh, our next
00:12:46.399 --> 00:12:49.030
question, Fred, comes from Casey in
00:12:49.040 --> 00:12:51.990
Colorado. In fact, he has two. Could you
00:12:52.000 --> 00:12:54.790
please explain the new theory of gravity
00:12:54.800 --> 00:12:57.829
in simple terms? Does it uh have any
00:12:57.839 --> 00:13:00.230
merit? And could you please explain
00:13:00.240 --> 00:13:02.389
Hubble tension and what it means for our
00:13:02.399 --> 00:13:05.310
understanding of the universe?
00:13:05.320 --> 00:13:09.190
Yes. Uh, so that's the answer. The
00:13:09.200 --> 00:13:12.470
answer is yes. Yes, I can.
00:13:12.480 --> 00:13:14.310
um the new theory of gravity which I
00:13:14.320 --> 00:13:16.790
like very much um this comes from
00:13:16.800 --> 00:13:19.110
scientists in Finland which is place I
00:13:19.120 --> 00:13:23.269
like very much as well um and it's what
00:13:23.279 --> 00:13:27.910
they've done you know they've taken um a
00:13:27.920 --> 00:13:28.750
step
00:13:28.760 --> 00:13:32.629
forward and and I'm assuming this is the
00:13:32.639 --> 00:13:36.949
uh this is indeed the um the uh the new
00:13:36.959 --> 00:13:39.190
theory that case is speaking about
00:13:39.200 --> 00:13:41.430
because we get nearly one every week a
00:13:41.440 --> 00:13:43.110
new theory in gravity but this is the
00:13:43.120 --> 00:13:46.470
latest one um it's uh as I said it's
00:13:46.480 --> 00:13:50.389
from uh it's from Finnish scientists uh
00:13:50.399 --> 00:13:53.389
at Alto University
00:13:53.399 --> 00:13:58.069
um so it's what they've done is what
00:13:58.079 --> 00:14:00.790
Einstein tried to do for the last for 30
00:14:00.800 --> 00:14:05.189
years of his life uh which is to unify
00:14:05.199 --> 00:14:08.870
quantum field theory and relativity
00:14:08.880 --> 00:14:11.990
uh and that's an issue because uh they
00:14:12.000 --> 00:14:14.949
are incompatible at the levels that we
00:14:14.959 --> 00:14:19.670
try and look at them now. Um and so uh
00:14:19.680 --> 00:14:22.389
to bring a quantum theory of gravity
00:14:22.399 --> 00:14:26.150
into being is a big step. So um what do
00:14:26.160 --> 00:14:28.550
I mean by bringing a theory into being?
00:14:28.560 --> 00:14:31.110
Well, we know that there are four
00:14:31.120 --> 00:14:34.389
fundamental forces in nature. Uh the
00:14:34.399 --> 00:14:37.310
strong and weak nuclear forces,
00:14:37.320 --> 00:14:39.910
electromagnetism and gravity. And the
00:14:39.920 --> 00:14:43.389
first three of those have very very
00:14:43.399 --> 00:14:46.550
wellestablished and uh well understood
00:14:46.560 --> 00:14:49.269
quantum theories. Um we for example we
00:14:49.279 --> 00:14:51.350
know that electromagnetism is propagated
00:14:51.360 --> 00:14:53.110
by photons. We talk about it all the
00:14:53.120 --> 00:14:55.910
time. So the suspicion is that gravity
00:14:55.920 --> 00:14:58.389
is propagated by gravitons but so far
00:14:58.399 --> 00:15:00.310
there's been no theory of what gravitons
00:15:00.320 --> 00:15:02.550
might be like. So what these scientists
00:15:02.560 --> 00:15:06.389
have done have developed a new theory a
00:15:06.399 --> 00:15:08.790
new quantum theory of gravity. Uh and
00:15:08.800 --> 00:15:10.790
I'm I'm actually going to once again uh
00:15:10.800 --> 00:15:13.430
quote from fizz.org. Uh very nice
00:15:13.440 --> 00:15:17.350
account of this um uh which is actually
00:15:17.360 --> 00:15:19.189
I think it is part of the press release
00:15:19.199 --> 00:15:21.910
from Alto University in Finland. So I'm
00:15:21.920 --> 00:15:24.710
quoting the university. Um, researchers
00:15:24.720 --> 00:15:26.629
at Alto University have developed a new
00:15:26.639 --> 00:15:28.310
theory, quantum theory of gravity, which
00:15:28.320 --> 00:15:30.990
describes gravity in a way that is
00:15:31.000 --> 00:15:33.430
compatible with the standard model of
00:15:33.440 --> 00:15:35.670
particle physics, opening the door to an
00:15:35.680 --> 00:15:37.110
improved understanding of how the
00:15:37.120 --> 00:15:41.030
universe began. While the world of uh
00:15:41.040 --> 00:15:43.350
quant theoretical physics may seem
00:15:43.360 --> 00:15:45.350
remote from applicable tech, the
00:15:45.360 --> 00:15:46.710
findings are remarkable. Modern
00:15:46.720 --> 00:15:48.629
technologies built on such fundamental
00:15:48.639 --> 00:15:50.550
advances. For example, the GPS in your
00:15:50.560 --> 00:15:52.710
smartphone works thanks to Einstein's
00:15:52.720 --> 00:15:55.430
theory of gravity. Uh and then uh the
00:15:55.440 --> 00:15:58.069
the article goes on to describe the
00:15:58.079 --> 00:16:00.790
theory. It's published in uh research
00:16:00.800 --> 00:16:05.110
reports on progress in physics. Um and
00:16:05.120 --> 00:16:06.870
this is the quote that I wanted to make.
00:16:06.880 --> 00:16:08.870
This comes from the uh lead author of
00:16:08.880 --> 00:16:13.310
the paper. Uh, and um
00:16:13.320 --> 00:16:16.430
um basically they
00:16:16.440 --> 00:16:19.150
um they the they
00:16:19.160 --> 00:16:21.590
the they've got lovely Finnish names.
00:16:21.600 --> 00:16:23.590
That's why I'm stumbling. It's Miko
00:16:23.600 --> 00:16:26.310
Partinan who's the uh who's the um lead
00:16:26.320 --> 00:16:31.430
author. Uh and the quote is as follows.
00:16:31.440 --> 00:16:33.430
And and this is this kind of puts it
00:16:33.440 --> 00:16:36.150
into perspective. If that's the big
00:16:36.160 --> 00:16:39.030
word, if this turns out to lead to a
00:16:39.040 --> 00:16:41.110
complete quantum field theory of
00:16:41.120 --> 00:16:43.350
gravity, then eventually it will give
00:16:43.360 --> 00:16:45.350
answers to the very difficult problems
00:16:45.360 --> 00:16:47.670
of understanding singularities in black
00:16:47.680 --> 00:16:51.269
hole, black holes and the big bang. A
00:16:51.279 --> 00:16:54.230
theory uh that coherently describes all
00:16:54.240 --> 00:16:56.069
fundamental forces of nature is often
00:16:56.079 --> 00:16:58.710
called the theory of everything. Uh some
00:16:58.720 --> 00:17:00.949
fundamental questions of physics still
00:17:00.959 --> 00:17:02.550
remain unanswered. For example, the
00:17:02.560 --> 00:17:04.390
present theories do not yet explain why
00:17:04.400 --> 00:17:06.069
there is more matter than antimatter in
00:17:06.079 --> 00:17:08.789
the observable universe. Uh and they
00:17:08.799 --> 00:17:10.470
what they've done is they've developed
00:17:10.480 --> 00:17:12.230
something called a a gauge theory. And
00:17:12.240 --> 00:17:13.909
gauge theories are a particular kind of
00:17:13.919 --> 00:17:15.829
theory in about the way particles
00:17:15.839 --> 00:17:18.630
interact with each other through a field
00:17:18.640 --> 00:17:21.110
like the Higs field and the Higs Bzon.
00:17:21.120 --> 00:17:25.750
Um so uh it's a basically a very nice uh
00:17:25.760 --> 00:17:27.909
a very nice account. Uh I won't read
00:17:27.919 --> 00:17:29.750
anymore because the you know gauge
00:17:29.760 --> 00:17:31.750
theories got symmetries and things of
00:17:31.760 --> 00:17:33.310
that sort.
00:17:33.320 --> 00:17:37.830
Um it's um a nice account. I recommend
00:17:37.840 --> 00:17:40.549
people have a look at the fizz.org uh
00:17:40.559 --> 00:17:44.870
paper uh sorry the f.org article Casey
00:17:44.880 --> 00:17:46.390
I'd send you to that as well to have a
00:17:46.400 --> 00:17:48.390
look. It's a very nice account of what's
00:17:48.400 --> 00:17:50.549
happening. You may end up like me
00:17:50.559 --> 00:17:52.070
thinking I really need to know a bit
00:17:52.080 --> 00:17:53.750
more about gauge theory before I can
00:17:53.760 --> 00:17:56.870
understand this. Uh but uh nevertheless,
00:17:56.880 --> 00:17:58.789
you'll get um a good idea of what's
00:17:58.799 --> 00:18:01.190
going on, I think.
00:18:01.200 --> 00:18:04.549
Okay. Now, Casey also wanted you to
00:18:04.559 --> 00:18:06.310
explain if you could Hubble tension.
00:18:06.320 --> 00:18:08.470
Yeah, that that's an easier one. And uh
00:18:08.480 --> 00:18:10.630
we as we've spoken about that's good. As
00:18:10.640 --> 00:18:13.270
we've spoken about today, uh that's one
00:18:13.280 --> 00:18:14.630
of the things we might get rid of. Yes,
00:18:14.640 --> 00:18:16.070
Hubble tension is a lot easier than
00:18:16.080 --> 00:18:18.470
gauge theory. Um and what it amounts to
00:18:18.480 --> 00:18:22.630
is we've got two ways of calculating the
00:18:22.640 --> 00:18:24.830
current expansion of the
00:18:24.840 --> 00:18:28.549
universe. Uh one is by looking at
00:18:28.559 --> 00:18:32.789
galaxies in our vicinity uh and looking
00:18:32.799 --> 00:18:35.270
at the rate at which they are speeding
00:18:35.280 --> 00:18:37.350
away from us. They go they're moving
00:18:37.360 --> 00:18:39.510
away from us faster as their distance
00:18:39.520 --> 00:18:41.350
increases. This is exactly the discovery
00:18:41.360 --> 00:18:44.230
that Hubble made in 1929.
00:18:44.240 --> 00:18:46.230
And uh gives us something we call the
00:18:46.240 --> 00:18:48.630
Hubble constant which is just the rate
00:18:48.640 --> 00:18:50.870
of expansion of the universe today. We
00:18:50.880 --> 00:18:52.789
call it hn
00:18:52.799 --> 00:18:56.230
um Hubble zero which is the expansion
00:18:56.240 --> 00:18:59.669
rate today. Now you can also get an idea
00:18:59.679 --> 00:19:02.230
of that or a measurement of it from the
00:19:02.240 --> 00:19:04.470
cosmic microwave background radiation.
00:19:04.480 --> 00:19:07.510
And that to recap is the flash of the
00:19:07.520 --> 00:19:09.270
big bang. We're looking back so far in
00:19:09.280 --> 00:19:10.630
time. We're seeing back to a time
00:19:10.640 --> 00:19:12.710
380,000 years after the Big Bang when
00:19:12.720 --> 00:19:14.070
the universe was still opaque and
00:19:14.080 --> 00:19:16.230
glowing brightly. So, we see this wall
00:19:16.240 --> 00:19:18.390
of radiation which is now in the
00:19:18.400 --> 00:19:21.350
microwave region of the spectrum. Uh,
00:19:21.360 --> 00:19:24.789
and it's peppered with a pattern of
00:19:24.799 --> 00:19:29.270
warmer and cooler places. Uh, and those
00:19:29.280 --> 00:19:31.430
uh zones of higher and lower
00:19:31.440 --> 00:19:33.110
temperature, and it's only by a tiny
00:19:33.120 --> 00:19:35.909
fraction, uh, they correspond to the
00:19:35.919 --> 00:19:39.110
structure in that fireball. Um in fact
00:19:39.120 --> 00:19:41.190
they're that it's caused by sound waves
00:19:41.200 --> 00:19:42.230
moving through it. They're called
00:19:42.240 --> 00:19:44.950
barionic acoustic oscillations. And we
00:19:44.960 --> 00:19:47.029
can by measuring the properties of the
00:19:47.039 --> 00:19:49.430
that peppering of warmer and cooler
00:19:49.440 --> 00:19:52.710
regions we can actually work out what
00:19:52.720 --> 00:19:55.510
the expansion of the universe is today.
00:19:55.520 --> 00:19:57.590
And it turns out that the two figures
00:19:57.600 --> 00:20:02.029
are different um by something like four
00:20:02.039 --> 00:20:05.830
5%. And that in modern terms is big
00:20:05.840 --> 00:20:08.230
enough to worry about. It's not just an
00:20:08.240 --> 00:20:10.470
error of measurement. These are these
00:20:10.480 --> 00:20:12.830
have got fairly tight limits on the
00:20:12.840 --> 00:20:14.789
uncertainties, but they're different.
00:20:14.799 --> 00:20:17.150
And that is the Hubble
00:20:17.160 --> 00:20:20.110
tension. But didn't they rec
00:20:20.120 --> 00:20:22.630
recently release a paper that suggested
00:20:22.640 --> 00:20:25.350
that the variations are actually within
00:20:25.360 --> 00:20:28.510
a normal range that this
00:20:28.520 --> 00:20:32.230
this these two figures that don't match
00:20:32.240 --> 00:20:34.390
are close enough? Well, yes. Didn't we
00:20:34.400 --> 00:20:36.230
talk? We did. Um, some people have
00:20:36.240 --> 00:20:38.149
suggested that that it is that it is
00:20:38.159 --> 00:20:40.190
actually within the experimental
00:20:40.200 --> 00:20:42.549
uncertainty, but it's still seen as a
00:20:42.559 --> 00:20:43.830
tension. They could they should be
00:20:43.840 --> 00:20:46.630
nearer than what they are.
00:20:46.640 --> 00:20:49.350
Yeah. Okay. Very, very interesting.
00:20:49.360 --> 00:20:50.950
Casey, thanks for both your questions.
00:20:50.960 --> 00:20:52.789
And no, you haven't spammed us. Two
00:20:52.799 --> 00:20:54.909
questions doesn't equal
00:20:54.919 --> 00:20:56.950
spam. There's probably a definition
00:20:56.960 --> 00:20:59.110
somewhere online that says how many how
00:20:59.120 --> 00:21:02.230
many emails become spam. You're well
00:21:02.240 --> 00:21:04.549
well outside that tolerance. So, no
00:21:04.559 --> 00:21:07.830
problem there. This is Space Nuts Q&A
00:21:07.840 --> 00:21:09.990
edition with Andrew Dunley and Professor
00:21:10.000 --> 00:21:13.750
Fred Watson.
00:21:13.760 --> 00:21:16.789
Roger, you're here. Also, Space Nuts.
00:21:16.799 --> 00:21:19.830
Okay, Fred, let's uh move on to our next
00:21:19.840 --> 00:21:21.750
question. It's an audio question, so you
00:21:21.760 --> 00:21:24.470
won't be able to hear it, but it comes
00:21:24.480 --> 00:21:28.789
from Simon. Hi, it's uh Simon from Vasey
00:21:28.799 --> 00:21:31.590
in uh New South Wales here. Uh my
00:21:31.600 --> 00:21:34.070
questions around uh the search for
00:21:34.080 --> 00:21:35.390
planet
00:21:35.400 --> 00:21:39.190
9. Uh other exoplanets uh few have been
00:21:39.200 --> 00:21:42.390
found using radial velocity method. Is
00:21:42.400 --> 00:21:45.510
that something we could do with the sun?
00:21:45.520 --> 00:21:49.110
Um, I guess planet 9 being so far out
00:21:49.120 --> 00:21:51.230
probably wouldn't have much
00:21:51.240 --> 00:21:53.909
influence, but we would have so much
00:21:53.919 --> 00:21:58.549
data on the sun as well um that it might
00:21:58.559 --> 00:22:01.590
be easy to sus out. Anyway, that's uh
00:22:01.600 --> 00:22:05.190
that's my question.
00:22:05.200 --> 00:22:07.510
Thank you, Simon. Good to hear from you.
00:22:07.520 --> 00:22:09.430
Hope all is well in Vasey in New South
00:22:09.440 --> 00:22:12.149
Wales. Uh he's asking in the search for
00:22:12.159 --> 00:22:15.510
planet 9 um we we've used the radial
00:22:15.520 --> 00:22:18.549
velocity method uh in the past to find
00:22:18.559 --> 00:22:22.310
other objects uh could we use the sun in
00:22:22.320 --> 00:22:24.789
the search for planet 9. Yeah, and it's
00:22:24.799 --> 00:22:27.190
a great question. Uh, and very well
00:22:27.200 --> 00:22:29.350
posed, Simon. Uh, I did actually manage
00:22:29.360 --> 00:22:31.750
to hear that through my own um
00:22:31.760 --> 00:22:33.909
recording, which I found and listened
00:22:33.919 --> 00:22:36.510
back to. So, I know what Simon
00:22:36.520 --> 00:22:41.029
asked. And what he's saying is that we
00:22:41.039 --> 00:22:42.950
know that when we look for exoplanets,
00:22:42.960 --> 00:22:45.750
planets around other stars, what we look
00:22:45.760 --> 00:22:48.549
for is the change in position of the
00:22:48.559 --> 00:22:51.110
star itself as it's pulled one way and
00:22:51.120 --> 00:22:52.789
another by the planet orbiting around
00:22:52.799 --> 00:22:53.830
it.
00:22:53.840 --> 00:22:58.470
And yes indeed the solar system uh has
00:22:58.480 --> 00:23:00.950
such an effect. So Jupiter principally
00:23:00.960 --> 00:23:03.110
is the the main planet that's pulling
00:23:03.120 --> 00:23:05.750
the pulling the sun's center one way or
00:23:05.760 --> 00:23:08.390
the other. Uh but the other planets all
00:23:08.400 --> 00:23:12.390
intervene as well. And so what we have
00:23:12.400 --> 00:23:14.149
is something that's called the solar
00:23:14.159 --> 00:23:17.430
systems barry center, the center of mass
00:23:17.440 --> 00:23:19.990
of the solar system. And that moves as
00:23:20.000 --> 00:23:21.630
the planets wander
00:23:21.640 --> 00:23:26.549
around. And um we've exactly as um as
00:23:26.559 --> 00:23:30.470
Simon says, we've managed to work out
00:23:30.480 --> 00:23:33.590
the position of the Barry center very
00:23:33.600 --> 00:23:36.310
very accurately. Uh partly because we
00:23:36.320 --> 00:23:38.390
know where the planets are and things of
00:23:38.400 --> 00:23:39.950
that sort.
00:23:39.960 --> 00:23:44.710
Now, Simon's question is actually
00:23:44.720 --> 00:23:47.590
exactly the same as a question that I
00:23:47.600 --> 00:23:50.230
found on Stack Exchange online. The
00:23:50.240 --> 00:23:53.830
question was can the paper narrowing the
00:23:53.840 --> 00:23:56.310
solar systems barry center to within 100
00:23:56.320 --> 00:24:00.950
meters help find planet 9? Uh so that's
00:24:00.960 --> 00:24:02.950
basically what Simon asked and the
00:24:02.960 --> 00:24:05.990
bottom line there's a long long set of
00:24:06.000 --> 00:24:08.470
calculations here which I won't go
00:24:08.480 --> 00:24:11.830
through but the answer is probably not.
00:24:11.840 --> 00:24:15.230
Um it's because the planet
00:24:15.240 --> 00:24:18.549
9 planet 9's influence on the solar
00:24:18.559 --> 00:24:20.870
systems barry center it's it's helped by
00:24:20.880 --> 00:24:22.390
the fact that planet 9's a long way
00:24:22.400 --> 00:24:26.310
away. Um um so it's got sort of leverage
00:24:26.320 --> 00:24:31.430
uh as it goes around. Um um the the the
00:24:31.440 --> 00:24:33.230
short answer
00:24:33.240 --> 00:24:37.029
is maybe we could do it, but we wouldn't
00:24:37.039 --> 00:24:39.990
be able to do it without hundreds if not
00:24:40.000 --> 00:24:42.870
thousands of years of precise data. And
00:24:42.880 --> 00:24:45.110
that's because planet 9 is probably
00:24:45.120 --> 00:24:47.350
orbiting the sun on that kind of time
00:24:47.360 --> 00:24:50.310
scale. And so you don't see any, you
00:24:50.320 --> 00:24:53.990
know, what you'd be looking for is um
00:24:54.000 --> 00:24:55.590
changes in the position of the Barry
00:24:55.600 --> 00:24:58.190
center which are not caused by the known
00:24:58.200 --> 00:25:01.269
planets, but it'll take you hundreds or
00:25:01.279 --> 00:25:03.190
thousands of years to see that because
00:25:03.200 --> 00:25:05.750
of the the great distance that planet 9
00:25:05.760 --> 00:25:09.029
is at. So the answer is probably not.
00:25:09.039 --> 00:25:10.789
But it's a great question and really
00:25:10.799 --> 00:25:12.630
nice thinking. I like Simon's thinking
00:25:12.640 --> 00:25:16.070
there. Yeah. Yeah. It's quite astute.
00:25:16.080 --> 00:25:18.870
The other factor that comes into play
00:25:18.880 --> 00:25:21.990
here is the new theory that planet 9
00:25:22.000 --> 00:25:24.070
doesn't exist because there's another
00:25:24.080 --> 00:25:25.950
planet even further
00:25:25.960 --> 00:25:29.269
out that uh has only just been sort of
00:25:29.279 --> 00:25:32.149
put into a um into a paper and open for
00:25:32.159 --> 00:25:34.310
discussion. So we only talked about that
00:25:34.320 --> 00:25:37.269
last week. So the search for planet 9
00:25:37.279 --> 00:25:40.710
might be a fororn hope anyway. Yeah. U
00:25:40.720 --> 00:25:42.870
because it probably according to the new
00:25:42.880 --> 00:25:44.549
theory doesn't that's correct. Yeah.
00:25:44.559 --> 00:25:46.710
Now, the new theory is based more on
00:25:46.720 --> 00:25:49.070
observations than theory because it's
00:25:49.080 --> 00:25:51.669
two observations separated by something
00:25:51.679 --> 00:25:53.110
like 30 years that seem to show
00:25:53.120 --> 00:25:54.630
something moving very slowly in the
00:25:54.640 --> 00:25:55.870
outer solar
00:25:55.880 --> 00:25:58.070
system. You can bet your life we'll do
00:25:58.080 --> 00:26:01.669
more observing of that over uh coming
00:26:01.679 --> 00:26:04.310
decades uh and maybe that will turn out
00:26:04.320 --> 00:26:05.750
to be what I think is being called
00:26:05.760 --> 00:26:07.350
planet 8 and a half at the moment
00:26:07.360 --> 00:26:09.029
because nobody really knows whether it's
00:26:09.039 --> 00:26:11.669
there or not. But as you said, if that
00:26:11.679 --> 00:26:14.149
is real, it rules out planet 9. the two
00:26:14.159 --> 00:26:16.710
colors exist together.
00:26:16.720 --> 00:26:18.710
Exactly. Right. All right. There you go,
00:26:18.720 --> 00:26:21.909
Simon. Um, we'll see where that ends up,
00:26:21.919 --> 00:26:24.470
but it might take a while. Our final
00:26:24.480 --> 00:26:27.990
question comes from Joe in Ola in
00:26:28.000 --> 00:26:29.430
Washington. I hope I pronounced that
00:26:29.440 --> 00:26:31.750
correctly. Is there an upper limit to
00:26:31.760 --> 00:26:34.630
how much delta V uh that can be
00:26:34.640 --> 00:26:36.549
practically generated by gravitational
00:26:36.559 --> 00:26:39.149
assists? Is it possible to develop
00:26:39.159 --> 00:26:41.510
sufficient delta V for timely
00:26:41.520 --> 00:26:43.510
interstellar travel by winding up a
00:26:43.520 --> 00:26:45.190
probe in our solar system before
00:26:45.200 --> 00:26:48.710
launching it uh to a nearby star? Uh
00:26:48.720 --> 00:26:50.710
thanks for all that you do. Cheers, Joe.
00:26:50.720 --> 00:26:53.350
Now, delta V, that is the impulse per
00:26:53.360 --> 00:26:57.590
unit of spacecraft mass. Yes. Well, it's
00:26:57.600 --> 00:26:59.710
basically the change in
00:26:59.720 --> 00:27:02.710
velocity. Um yes. So impulse is the
00:27:02.720 --> 00:27:05.269
that's the way people talk about these
00:27:05.279 --> 00:27:06.950
delta V's in this in the rocket
00:27:06.960 --> 00:27:09.669
industry. It's all rocket science or is
00:27:09.679 --> 00:27:12.870
it anyway delta V uh I think in Joe's
00:27:12.880 --> 00:27:16.070
context here is how much velocity
00:27:16.080 --> 00:27:18.870
increase you can get from a gravity
00:27:18.880 --> 00:27:22.149
assist from a slingshot. Uh and the
00:27:22.159 --> 00:27:24.710
answer is probably no. um in terms of
00:27:24.720 --> 00:27:27.269
trying to wind up you know the speed of
00:27:27.279 --> 00:27:30.070
things so that you you know you hurl
00:27:30.080 --> 00:27:33.350
something out of the solar system at uh
00:27:33.360 --> 00:27:34.789
10th the speed of light or something
00:27:34.799 --> 00:27:38.390
like that. Um the reading that I've done
00:27:38.400 --> 00:27:41.110
on this and I did check it out uh seems
00:27:41.120 --> 00:27:41.870
to
00:27:41.880 --> 00:27:45.630
suggest excuse me that um we are
00:27:45.640 --> 00:27:47.870
probably
00:27:47.880 --> 00:27:52.149
limited to um the sorts of velocities
00:27:52.159 --> 00:27:55.110
that we see among the planets of the
00:27:55.120 --> 00:27:57.750
solar system. Now remember the earth is
00:27:57.760 --> 00:28:01.669
orbiting the the sun at 30 kilometers/s
00:28:01.679 --> 00:28:05.190
um and um those velocities get less as
00:28:05.200 --> 00:28:07.350
you get farther away from the sun. And
00:28:07.360 --> 00:28:09.110
that's part of the equation with a
00:28:09.120 --> 00:28:10.630
slingshot because what you're trying to
00:28:10.640 --> 00:28:12.549
do is steal some momentum from the
00:28:12.559 --> 00:28:15.029
planet and give it to the spacecraft.
00:28:15.039 --> 00:28:18.149
And so there are upper limits uh on what
00:28:18.159 --> 00:28:20.950
sort of velocity change you can get. It
00:28:20.960 --> 00:28:22.549
depends on how close you go to the
00:28:22.559 --> 00:28:23.909
planet, depends whether the planet's got
00:28:23.919 --> 00:28:25.990
an atmosphere or not. uh depends on the
00:28:26.000 --> 00:28:28.470
angle that you come in. Um the figure
00:28:28.480 --> 00:28:31.029
that I've seen quoted as a maximum for
00:28:31.039 --> 00:28:32.789
Jupiter, which is the most effective
00:28:32.799 --> 00:28:34.310
planet for this sort of thing, being the
00:28:34.320 --> 00:28:35.909
by far the most massive planet in the
00:28:35.919 --> 00:28:38.149
solar system, is a change of 40
00:28:38.159 --> 00:28:40.070
kilometers/s.
00:28:40.080 --> 00:28:43.430
Um, now that's very good if you're, you
00:28:43.440 --> 00:28:44.789
know, trying to get something out to the
00:28:44.799 --> 00:28:47.110
outer solar system, but it's not going
00:28:47.120 --> 00:28:49.909
to help you getting things to other
00:28:49.919 --> 00:28:52.710
planets, especially when you think, you
00:28:52.720 --> 00:28:56.549
know, if you give a a planet, sorry, a
00:28:56.559 --> 00:28:59.950
spacecraft an impulse a delta V of 40
00:28:59.960 --> 00:29:02.269
kilometers/s by interacting with
00:29:02.279 --> 00:29:05.029
Jupiter. You've got to then find another
00:29:05.039 --> 00:29:07.830
planet that's that's going to give it
00:29:07.840 --> 00:29:09.590
even more. But the other planets are all
00:29:09.600 --> 00:29:12.630
moving slower than that. So, uh, that
00:29:12.640 --> 00:29:14.630
the change in momentum is a lot harder
00:29:14.640 --> 00:29:17.510
to get. Uh, so, so I think the answer is
00:29:17.520 --> 00:29:19.590
it's a very nice idea, you know, as Joe
00:29:19.600 --> 00:29:21.269
suggests, winding up by all these
00:29:21.279 --> 00:29:23.110
gravitational interactions. You can only
00:29:23.120 --> 00:29:25.510
do it within limits. You're not going to
00:29:25.520 --> 00:29:27.990
be able to get, you know, like 100,000
00:29:28.000 --> 00:29:30.149
kilometers/s or something like that from
00:29:30.159 --> 00:29:32.789
doing that. Yeah. I I suppose you could
00:29:32.799 --> 00:29:34.950
equate it to using a slingshot or a
00:29:34.960 --> 00:29:36.789
Shanghai. there's there's only so much
00:29:36.799 --> 00:29:39.029
tension you can put in into the the
00:29:39.039 --> 00:29:41.510
rubber band to say to fire the rock and
00:29:41.520 --> 00:29:42.950
you're not going to be able to fire the
00:29:42.960 --> 00:29:46.149
rock any faster than the maximum amount
00:29:46.159 --> 00:29:48.549
of storage the rubber band can hold and
00:29:48.559 --> 00:29:50.870
I I'm guessing it's the same for yes
00:29:50.880 --> 00:29:53.029
there's a yeah there's a limited amount
00:29:53.039 --> 00:29:55.029
of energy that you can get from from a
00:29:55.039 --> 00:29:58.549
slingshot that's right yeah nice idea
00:29:58.559 --> 00:30:01.029
although it's it's been very effective
00:30:01.039 --> 00:30:03.430
as you said for sending things to the
00:30:03.440 --> 00:30:05.269
outer solar system the the Voyager
00:30:05.279 --> 00:30:09.350
probes particularly uh used um the
00:30:09.360 --> 00:30:12.470
slingshot effect um several times to to
00:30:12.480 --> 00:30:14.789
to to get to the outer solar system
00:30:14.799 --> 00:30:16.389
because they didn't have the fuel to do
00:30:16.399 --> 00:30:20.789
it. So they figured out through a um an
00:30:20.799 --> 00:30:23.110
alignment of the planets that they could
00:30:23.120 --> 00:30:26.230
they could get out there just by using
00:30:26.240 --> 00:30:28.389
the um the rotation of the planets or
00:30:28.399 --> 00:30:33.430
the um the process that uh that uh Joe's
00:30:33.440 --> 00:30:35.750
been talking about. So, um, yeah, it it
00:30:35.760 --> 00:30:38.750
does work quite effectively for
00:30:38.760 --> 00:30:42.149
slower slower speeds, but uh, yeah, it
00:30:42.159 --> 00:30:44.950
interstellar probably beyond us in that
00:30:44.960 --> 00:30:47.350
regard. Yeah, probably the the the
00:30:47.360 --> 00:30:49.750
lasers and, um, you know, in a solar
00:30:49.760 --> 00:30:51.830
sail or a light sail might be a better
00:30:51.840 --> 00:30:54.070
bet, but even that's beyond our
00:30:54.080 --> 00:30:57.269
technology at the moment.
00:30:57.279 --> 00:30:59.190
Uh, probably won't be for long, though.
00:30:59.200 --> 00:31:01.990
I think they'll develop that and and get
00:31:02.000 --> 00:31:03.990
some spacecraft heading out towards the
00:31:04.000 --> 00:31:07.350
Alpha Centator sector and um anyway,
00:31:07.360 --> 00:31:09.669
that remains to be seen. Uh but that
00:31:09.679 --> 00:31:11.269
would still be a pretty slow mission in
00:31:11.279 --> 00:31:14.070
the scheme of things. But um yeah, great
00:31:14.080 --> 00:31:15.990
question, Joe. Thanks for sending it in.
00:31:16.000 --> 00:31:18.789
And if you'd like to send us a question,
00:31:18.799 --> 00:31:21.029
uh you can do that uh through our
00:31:21.039 --> 00:31:22.269
website,
00:31:22.279 --> 00:31:24.789
spacenutspodcast.com. Spacenuts.io.
00:31:24.799 --> 00:31:27.510
Click on the AMA link at the top and you
00:31:27.520 --> 00:31:30.149
can send us text and audio questions.
00:31:30.159 --> 00:31:31.830
And don't forget to tell us who you are
00:31:31.840 --> 00:31:33.110
and where you're from. We love to know
00:31:33.120 --> 00:31:34.710
that sort of stuff so that we can send
00:31:34.720 --> 00:31:37.110
the boys around. Uh or we could send
00:31:37.120 --> 00:31:38.789
Hugh around because he can't be with us
00:31:38.799 --> 00:31:40.630
today. So he must be visiting one of you
00:31:40.640 --> 00:31:43.909
guys um with his with his um you know
00:31:43.919 --> 00:31:46.950
balaclava on maybe. Yeah. Um thank you
00:31:46.960 --> 00:31:49.430
Fred as always. A pleasure Andrew as
00:31:49.440 --> 00:31:52.070
always. Good to talk and uh good to hear
00:31:52.080 --> 00:31:54.230
our listeners questions.
00:31:54.240 --> 00:31:56.789
It is. It is. All right. Well, catch you
00:31:56.799 --> 00:31:58.630
again real soon. Professor Fred Watson,
00:31:58.640 --> 00:32:00.310
astronomer at large. And from me, Andrew
00:32:00.320 --> 00:32:02.310
Dunley. Thanks for your company. See you
00:32:02.320 --> 00:32:04.310
on the next episode of Space Nuts. Bye
00:32:04.320 --> 00:32:07.029
for now. Space Nuts. You'll be listening
00:32:07.039 --> 00:32:10.549
to the Space Nuts podcast.
00:32:10.559 --> 00:32:13.430
Available at Apple Podcasts, Spotify,
00:32:13.440 --> 00:32:16.070
iHeart Radio, or your favorite podcast
00:32:16.080 --> 00:32:18.470
player. You can also stream on demand at
00:32:18.480 --> 00:32:21.350
byes.com. This has been another quality
00:32:21.360 --> 00:32:25.960
podcast production from knights.com.