Jan. 26, 2026

Black Hole Temperatures, Cosmic Mapping & the Mystery of Dark Matter| Q&A | Space Nuts:...

Black Hole Temperatures, Cosmic Mapping & the Mystery of Dark Matter| Q&A | Space Nuts:...
The player is loading ...
Black Hole Temperatures, Cosmic Mapping & the Mystery of Dark Matter| Q&A | Space Nuts:...

Sponsor Link:

This episode is brought to you with the support of NordVPN. When you really need to do something about your online privacy, go with the best... NordVPN . Get our extra 4 months free offer by visiting Nordvpn.com/spacenuts (https://nordvpn.com/spacenuts)


Temperature of Black Holes, Cosmic Mapping, and the Nature of Space

In this thought-provoking episode of Space Nuts , hosts Andrew Dunkley and Professor Fred Watson tackle some of the most intriguing questions from their audience. Join them as they delve into the chilling temperatures of black holes, the expansive mapping of the universe by cutting-edge telescopes, and the enigmatic nature of space itself.

Episode Highlights:

- The Temperature of Black Holes: Andrew and Fred discuss Casey's question regarding the temperature of black holes. They explore the stark contrast between the scorching accretion disks and the surprisingly frigid temperatures within the event horizons, shedding light on the complexities of black hole physics.

- Mapping the Universe: Eli's inquiry about the James Webb and Vera Rubin telescopes leads to a fascinating discussion on how much of the universe has been mapped and what we can expect in the coming decade. The hosts highlight the capabilities of these telescopes and the potential discoveries that await.

- The Emptiness of Space: Robert poses a thought-provoking question about the nature of space and the Higgs boson. Andrew and Fred unravel the concept of the Higgs field, discussing its implications for our understanding of the universe and whether space is truly empty or filled with these elusive particles.

- The Impact of Dark Matter and Energy: Rennie challenges the hosts to consider how discovering the true nature of dark matter and dark energy might affect life on Earth. Andrew and Fred reflect on the long-term benefits of such knowledge, drawing parallels to historical scientific advancements.


For more Space Nuts, including our continuously updating newsfeed and to listen to all our episodes, visit our website. (https://www.spacenutspodcast.com/) Follow us on social media at SpaceNutsPod on Facebook, Instagram, and more. We love engaging with our community, so be sure to drop us a message or comment on your favorite platform.

If you’d like to help support Space Nuts and join our growing family of insiders for commercial-free episodes and more, visit spacenutspodcast.com/about (https://www.spacenutspodcast.com/about) .

Stay curious, keep looking up, and join us next time for more stellar insights and cosmic wonders. Until then, clear skies and happy stargazing.


Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/space-nuts-astronomy-insights-cosmic-discoveries--2631155/support (https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/space-nuts-astronomy-insights-cosmic-discoveries--2631155/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss) .

Episode link: https://play.headliner.app/episode/31318370?utm_source=youtube

WEBVTT
Kind: captions
Language: en

00:00:00.400 --> 00:00:02.230
Hi there. Thanks for joining us again.


00:00:02.240 --> 00:00:05.670
This is a Q&A uh edition of Space Nuts,


00:00:05.680 --> 00:00:08.310
where we uh take audience questions and


00:00:08.320 --> 00:00:10.230
we pretend that we know what we're


00:00:10.240 --> 00:00:12.150
talking about in attempting to answer


00:00:12.160 --> 00:00:15.589
them or we get it right sometimes, too.


00:00:15.599 --> 00:00:18.790
Uh today we're going to be answering a


00:00:18.800 --> 00:00:20.710
question about uh the temperature of


00:00:20.720 --> 00:00:23.830
black holes. Uh I I'm not sure we've


00:00:23.840 --> 00:00:25.189
been there before. It may have come up,


00:00:25.199 --> 00:00:28.470
but um I can't remember when. uh and a


00:00:28.480 --> 00:00:30.870
question uh asking with the James Webb


00:00:30.880 --> 00:00:33.030
Space Telescope and the Vera Rubin


00:00:33.040 --> 00:00:35.830
telescope how much of the universe has


00:00:35.840 --> 00:00:39.910
been mapped. I can tell you this much uh


00:00:39.920 --> 00:00:42.229
and the emptiness of space is being


00:00:42.239 --> 00:00:45.110
questioned and what difference will it


00:00:45.120 --> 00:00:48.790
make to humanity uh if we find dark


00:00:48.800 --> 00:00:52.549
matter and dark energy? Um that's a


00:00:52.559 --> 00:00:54.069
really interesting question and Fred


00:00:54.079 --> 00:00:55.830
knows the answer. We'll ask him shortly


00:00:55.840 --> 00:00:58.229
on this edition of Space Nuts.


00:00:58.239 --> 00:01:03.029
>> 15 seconds. Guidance is internal. 10 9


00:01:03.039 --> 00:01:04.789
Ignition sequence start.


00:01:04.799 --> 00:01:05.750
>> Space nuts.


00:01:05.760 --> 00:01:08.230
>> 5 4 3 2


00:01:08.240 --> 00:01:10.630
>> 1 2 3 4 5 5 4 3 2 1


00:01:10.640 --> 00:01:11.830
>> Space Nuts.


00:01:11.840 --> 00:01:14.469
>> Astronauts report. It feels good.


00:01:14.479 --> 00:01:16.710
>> And he's back. And he has all the


00:01:16.720 --> 00:01:18.469
answers to all the questions of life,


00:01:18.479 --> 00:01:19.830
the universe, and everything. Professor


00:01:19.840 --> 00:01:21.830
Fred Watson, astronomer at large. Hello,


00:01:21.840 --> 00:01:24.070
Fred.


00:01:24.080 --> 00:01:25.590
No pressure there, Andrew.


00:01:25.600 --> 00:01:27.270
>> None at all. None at all.


00:01:27.280 --> 00:01:28.710
>> No pressure. That's right.


00:01:28.720 --> 00:01:30.550
>> Uh let's get straight into it, shall we?


00:01:30.560 --> 00:01:33.990
Um uh one of our regular contributors is


00:01:34.000 --> 00:01:36.069
Casey, who has a very interesting


00:01:36.079 --> 00:01:38.390
question about a subject we never


00:01:38.400 --> 00:01:40.469
discuss, black holes.


00:01:40.479 --> 00:01:43.030
>> Hi guys, this is Casey from Colorado and


00:01:43.040 --> 00:01:44.630
I was thinking about the temperature of


00:01:44.640 --> 00:01:47.270
black holes. I know that the accretion


00:01:47.280 --> 00:01:49.190
disc would be very hot, but I was


00:01:49.200 --> 00:01:51.910
wondering once you get past the event


00:01:51.920 --> 00:01:54.550
horizon if it would be hot or cold. Why


00:01:54.560 --> 00:01:57.910
do we think this? Thanks for the podcast


00:01:57.920 --> 00:02:00.310
and I hope you're both well. Thanks.


00:02:00.320 --> 00:02:01.830
>> Thank you, Casey. She's got me thinking


00:02:01.840 --> 00:02:03.350
about the temperature in Colorado


00:02:03.360 --> 00:02:05.990
because like we're facing some horrific


00:02:06.000 --> 00:02:07.510
temperatures around here at the moment,


00:02:07.520 --> 00:02:09.190
but I' i'd imagine it'd be quite the


00:02:09.200 --> 00:02:11.190
opposite in Colorado this time of the


00:02:11.200 --> 00:02:13.350
year.


00:02:13.360 --> 00:02:15.430
Yeah, I think that's that's absolutely


00:02:15.440 --> 00:02:17.990
right. Yes. But part of the world in


00:02:18.000 --> 00:02:19.190
winter.


00:02:19.200 --> 00:02:23.030
>> Absolutely. Um, now temperature of black


00:02:23.040 --> 00:02:24.790
holes. This this one's interesting


00:02:24.800 --> 00:02:27.830
because I suppose it varies on several


00:02:27.840 --> 00:02:29.990
factors. Um, where you are, what you're


00:02:30.000 --> 00:02:32.229
doing.


00:02:32.239 --> 00:02:34.630
I don't know what


00:02:34.640 --> 00:02:36.790
I would like. It's not like the not like


00:02:36.800 --> 00:02:39.509
the temperature of the sun, is it?


00:02:39.519 --> 00:02:43.190
>> No. No, it's not. Um, it's it's a re I'm


00:02:43.200 --> 00:02:46.309
I'm so glad Casey asked this question


00:02:46.319 --> 00:02:48.070
because it sent me down a rabbit hole I


00:02:48.080 --> 00:02:49.589
haven't been down before.


00:02:49.599 --> 00:02:50.229
>> Oh, wow.


00:02:50.239 --> 00:02:52.229
>> Uh, in and it leads you straight to


00:02:52.239 --> 00:02:57.430
quantum theory. Uh, uh, and um, it's,


00:02:57.440 --> 00:03:00.630
you know, it's a it really in a sense


00:03:00.640 --> 00:03:02.710
it's quite unexpected


00:03:02.720 --> 00:03:06.550
uh, what's what's happening. Uh so um


00:03:06.560 --> 00:03:10.390
the bottom line is whilst as Casey


00:03:10.400 --> 00:03:13.030
exactly as Casey says the accretion disc


00:03:13.040 --> 00:03:15.990
of the black hole is extremely hot uh


00:03:16.000 --> 00:03:17.670
and you know we're talking millions of


00:03:17.680 --> 00:03:19.990
degrees there because this that's where


00:03:20.000 --> 00:03:22.390
you get X-ray radiation from. It's the


00:03:22.400 --> 00:03:24.470
the stuff charging around the accretion


00:03:24.480 --> 00:03:26.869
disc uh that's uh swirling around the


00:03:26.879 --> 00:03:29.589
the black hole itself. But the black


00:03:29.599 --> 00:03:32.550
hole itself


00:03:32.560 --> 00:03:35.750
is the opposite. It's really really


00:03:35.760 --> 00:03:41.430
cold. Um, and basically, uh, it's


00:03:41.440 --> 00:03:45.430
because the the amount of radiation


00:03:45.440 --> 00:03:50.710
that they, uh, that they release is at a


00:03:50.720 --> 00:03:55.030
level uh, which means its temperature is


00:03:55.040 --> 00:03:57.670
measured in gazillionth of a degree.


00:03:57.680 --> 00:04:01.429
It's virtually absolute zero.


00:04:01.439 --> 00:04:04.789
um they they


00:04:04.799 --> 00:04:07.270
basically they're


00:04:07.280 --> 00:04:10.710
it's quite a a nice way of putting it um


00:04:10.720 --> 00:04:14.229
which which I've uh summarized uh I


00:04:14.239 --> 00:04:17.110
think this comes from Wikipedia. It may


00:04:17.120 --> 00:04:19.349
come from AI actually. But the bottom


00:04:19.359 --> 00:04:22.150
line is even though black holes pull in


00:04:22.160 --> 00:04:24.950
matter and energy, their temperature is


00:04:24.960 --> 00:04:28.390
incredibly low because their large mass


00:04:28.400 --> 00:04:31.830
makes their event horizons effectively


00:04:31.840 --> 00:04:34.870
cold thermal emitters, absorbing energy


00:04:34.880 --> 00:04:37.189
faster than they radiate it at these


00:04:37.199 --> 00:04:39.830
scales. So that's the key to what's


00:04:39.840 --> 00:04:42.710
happening that like everything else,


00:04:42.720 --> 00:04:45.189
black holes suck stuff. it sucks stuff


00:04:45.199 --> 00:04:49.430
in uh and that stuff is matter which is


00:04:49.440 --> 00:04:52.469
equivalent to energy uh and because it's


00:04:52.479 --> 00:04:54.710
stuff that's going in and not radiating


00:04:54.720 --> 00:04:57.749
outwards uh even though there is what we


00:04:57.759 --> 00:04:59.590
call Hawking radiation which I'll get to


00:04:59.600 --> 00:05:03.430
in a second but that that um you know


00:05:03.440 --> 00:05:05.749
the uh what it means is that the the


00:05:05.759 --> 00:05:08.550
fact that there there's an energy input


00:05:08.560 --> 00:05:11.350
into the black hole it means that to the


00:05:11.360 --> 00:05:14.230
outside observer they look cold. They


00:05:14.240 --> 00:05:16.950
look very very cold. There is a


00:05:16.960 --> 00:05:20.150
relationship as you said uh we it might


00:05:20.160 --> 00:05:22.950
vary with some things and what it varies


00:05:22.960 --> 00:05:25.189
with uh is actually the mass of the


00:05:25.199 --> 00:05:29.270
black hole. Uh it's it's roughly uh an


00:05:29.280 --> 00:05:32.310
inverse proportionality proportionality


00:05:32.320 --> 00:05:34.790
the the temperature is inversely


00:05:34.800 --> 00:05:38.070
proportional to the mass. Um, and what


00:05:38.080 --> 00:05:40.230
that means is for super massive black


00:05:40.240 --> 00:05:43.909
holes, they are extremely cold. Uh, and


00:05:43.919 --> 00:05:45.510
that sort of figures because they're


00:05:45.520 --> 00:05:47.749
sucking in more energy and so the


00:05:47.759 --> 00:05:49.510
surface to an outside observer would


00:05:49.520 --> 00:05:51.909
look colder. Uh, they're talking about


00:05:51.919 --> 00:05:56.870
10 the minus14° Kelvin. U something with


00:05:56.880 --> 00:06:02.950
the mass of the sun um is a barmy 10us


00:06:02.960 --> 00:06:07.110
7° Kelvin. It's still virtually zero,


00:06:07.120 --> 00:06:10.070
but it's more uh more than the super


00:06:10.080 --> 00:06:11.909
massive black holes. So something the


00:06:11.919 --> 00:06:13.749
mass of the sun. So it's inversely


00:06:13.759 --> 00:06:16.550
proportional to the mass uh that inverse


00:06:16.560 --> 00:06:21.670
relationship. Uh and so so that's that's


00:06:21.680 --> 00:06:25.590
kind of what it's the Hawking radiation


00:06:25.600 --> 00:06:30.629
that gives the black hole a temperature


00:06:30.639 --> 00:06:33.110
essentially. It's because it's it's


00:06:33.120 --> 00:06:36.150
emitting radiation. Um, and we've talked


00:06:36.160 --> 00:06:37.830
about Hawking radiation before. Even


00:06:37.840 --> 00:06:39.189
though everything gets sucked into a


00:06:39.199 --> 00:06:40.950
black hole, there's this quantum


00:06:40.960 --> 00:06:44.070
situation where you can get um two


00:06:44.080 --> 00:06:46.070
virtual particles being created from


00:06:46.080 --> 00:06:48.550
nothing in empty space. One gets trapped


00:06:48.560 --> 00:06:50.309
by the black hole, the other doesn't.


00:06:50.319 --> 00:06:52.950
And so we see that as Hawking radiation


00:06:52.960 --> 00:06:55.350
uh suggested by Steven Hawking in the


00:06:55.360 --> 00:06:58.870
1970s now very well established. Uh but


00:06:58.880 --> 00:07:00.950
yeah to summarize the bottom line is


00:07:00.960 --> 00:07:03.670
Casey's uh question is a good one uh


00:07:03.680 --> 00:07:05.589
because it turns out that black holes


00:07:05.599 --> 00:07:08.150
are very very cold indeed despite the


00:07:08.160 --> 00:07:11.029
intense heat of the accretion disc. Work


00:07:11.039 --> 00:07:12.870
that one out. It's a really hard thing


00:07:12.880 --> 00:07:15.029
to to put your imagination around.


00:07:15.039 --> 00:07:17.189
>> I suppose you'd compare it to the heat


00:07:17.199 --> 00:07:19.189
on the It's got nothing to do with it at


00:07:19.199 --> 00:07:22.550
all, but by example the heat on the sun


00:07:22.560 --> 00:07:25.430
side of Mercury versus the cool on the


00:07:25.440 --> 00:07:28.710
shadow side. They're so extreme.


00:07:28.720 --> 00:07:29.350
>> Um.


00:07:29.360 --> 00:07:31.510
>> Yes. Yeah, that's right.


00:07:31.520 --> 00:07:34.150
>> For the same reason.


00:07:34.160 --> 00:07:36.550
>> Well, similar because the dark side of


00:07:36.560 --> 00:07:39.350
Mercury is cold uh because it's


00:07:39.360 --> 00:07:42.710
radiating energy into space.


00:07:42.720 --> 00:07:47.110
>> Um uh whereas uh and that that energy


00:07:47.120 --> 00:07:49.029
loss reduces the temperature. Whereas


00:07:49.039 --> 00:07:50.230
with a black hole, it's the other way


00:07:50.240 --> 00:07:52.070
around. The thing is the thing is


00:07:52.080 --> 00:07:54.629
sucking energy in at a greater rate than


00:07:54.639 --> 00:07:59.029
it's emitting energy. Uh so Mercury


00:07:59.039 --> 00:08:00.869
would Mercury's dark side would lose


00:08:00.879 --> 00:08:03.749
heat by infrared radiation. Um that


00:08:03.759 --> 00:08:06.150
radiation in the case of a black hole is


00:08:06.160 --> 00:08:08.230
is much smaller than the radiation that


00:08:08.240 --> 00:08:09.749
it's sucking in which is why it looks


00:08:09.759 --> 00:08:12.710
extremely cold. Uh so I'm trying to I'm


00:08:12.720 --> 00:08:14.070
trying to make sense of the parallel


00:08:14.080 --> 00:08:16.150
that you drew and I think it's I think


00:08:16.160 --> 00:08:18.070
it holds water Andrew. I think I think


00:08:18.080 --> 00:08:19.189
it's a good good answer.


00:08:19.199 --> 00:08:20.550
>> Well, actually the water will probably


00:08:20.560 --> 00:08:22.629
evaporate or freeze but anyway um


00:08:22.639 --> 00:08:24.550
>> freeze it.


00:08:24.560 --> 00:08:27.430
>> Uh I just thought of a question. Um so


00:08:27.440 --> 00:08:30.790
if a black hole sort of,


00:08:30.800 --> 00:08:33.430
you know, runs out of food, would that


00:08:33.440 --> 00:08:37.990
cause an alteration in its temperature?


00:08:38.000 --> 00:08:39.509
Um,


00:08:39.519 --> 00:08:41.430
I don't think so because I think once


00:08:41.440 --> 00:08:44.310
the I I get what you're saying and


00:08:44.320 --> 00:08:45.750
certainly in the argument that we've


00:08:45.760 --> 00:08:48.790
just been talking about, you'd think


00:08:48.800 --> 00:08:50.389
that if it's not sucking in energy


00:08:50.399 --> 00:08:51.670
anymore,


00:08:51.680 --> 00:08:54.070
>> uh, it it or sucking in matter anymore,


00:08:54.080 --> 00:08:56.310
it it would uh it would actually change


00:08:56.320 --> 00:08:59.430
its uh change its temperature. Um the


00:08:59.440 --> 00:09:01.829
reason why I think that might not happen


00:09:01.839 --> 00:09:04.389
is because the only thing that uh the


00:09:04.399 --> 00:09:06.550
temperature seems to be related to is


00:09:06.560 --> 00:09:09.590
the mass itself. So um there must be a


00:09:09.600 --> 00:09:11.990
mechanism and I'm sorry it's eluding me


00:09:12.000 --> 00:09:14.070
at the moment. Uh but there must be a


00:09:14.080 --> 00:09:16.070
mechanism that sort of locks once you've


00:09:16.080 --> 00:09:18.949
once you've got a a a black hole of


00:09:18.959 --> 00:09:22.230
sufficient mass um then uh its


00:09:22.240 --> 00:09:25.829
temperature is sort of locked in. Uh it


00:09:25.839 --> 00:09:28.389
must still be taking in energy in the


00:09:28.399 --> 00:09:31.030
form of radiation. So perhaps that's


00:09:31.040 --> 00:09:32.949
what's what's happening. you know, light


00:09:32.959 --> 00:09:34.630
light certainly gets sucked into a black


00:09:34.640 --> 00:09:37.670
hole that even even if it's not got an


00:09:37.680 --> 00:09:40.870
accretion disc of stuff to to feed on,


00:09:40.880 --> 00:09:42.710
uh the light certainly going in and


00:09:42.720 --> 00:09:44.470
perhaps that's enough to keep the


00:09:44.480 --> 00:09:47.590
temperature as low as we've described.


00:09:47.600 --> 00:09:49.750
Indeed. All right. Uh thanks Casey.


00:09:49.760 --> 00:09:51.110
Lovely to hear from you. Hope you're


00:09:51.120 --> 00:09:54.790
coping with the uh - 10^ the 15° Kelvin


00:09:54.800 --> 00:09:58.870
in Colorado. Uh our next question comes


00:09:58.880 --> 00:10:01.350
from Eli. Hello space fairers. I'm


00:10:01.360 --> 00:10:04.870
writing from the Coachella Valley desert


00:10:04.880 --> 00:10:07.350
here in Southern California. Uh, I've


00:10:07.360 --> 00:10:09.430
often thought some of the Google


00:10:09.440 --> 00:10:11.750
Earthlike software would be amazing to


00:10:11.760 --> 00:10:13.750
take into other galaxies throughout the


00:10:13.760 --> 00:10:17.030
universe. Intriguingly, I imagine you


00:10:17.040 --> 00:10:18.870
could take them back in time according


00:10:18.880 --> 00:10:21.350
to estimates of cosmic inflation, etc.


00:10:21.360 --> 00:10:24.470
all the way to the big bang in theory.


00:10:24.480 --> 00:10:26.870
um to his question with James Webb and


00:10:26.880 --> 00:10:29.509
the Vera Rubin coming online how much of


00:10:29.519 --> 00:10:32.389
the visible visible universe have we


00:10:32.399 --> 00:10:34.710
basically mapped and how much are we


00:10:34.720 --> 00:10:38.230
projected to map in say the next decade


00:10:38.240 --> 00:10:41.190
I think we've actually talked about how


00:10:41.200 --> 00:10:43.750
much that they're going to look at and


00:10:43.760 --> 00:10:45.750
how long it's going to take and I I I


00:10:45.760 --> 00:10:47.269
think Eli's going to be quite surprised


00:10:47.279 --> 00:10:50.550
by the answer


00:10:50.560 --> 00:10:53.269
well yes that's right I mean the the key


00:10:53.279 --> 00:10:55.670
words here are the Vera Vera Rubin


00:10:55.680 --> 00:10:59.269
Observatory uh because that will map the


00:10:59.279 --> 00:11:03.030
entire sky down to quite a significant


00:11:03.040 --> 00:11:08.389
depth not as deep as the web will um


00:11:08.399 --> 00:11:10.470
although it is an 8 m telescope the web


00:11:10.480 --> 00:11:12.790
is only 6 and a half mters so it's


00:11:12.800 --> 00:11:15.430
probably not far short of it uh the web


00:11:15.440 --> 00:11:17.350
of course looking in infrared and the


00:11:17.360 --> 00:11:19.670
Vera Rubin telescope looking in visible


00:11:19.680 --> 00:11:21.430
light but it's going to it's going to


00:11:21.440 --> 00:11:25.190
photograph the whole sky southern sky uh


00:11:25.200 --> 00:11:30.069
in uh every three three nights or so. So


00:11:30.079 --> 00:11:32.710
that will build up over the years a map


00:11:32.720 --> 00:11:34.310
of the things that don't change. I mean


00:11:34.320 --> 00:11:35.750
what it's looking for is things that do


00:11:35.760 --> 00:11:39.670
change but um as you integrate for all


00:11:39.680 --> 00:11:42.230
that time and by that I mean you you you


00:11:42.240 --> 00:11:44.710
know expose the detector to the sky so


00:11:44.720 --> 00:11:46.790
that you build up the image uh and you


00:11:46.800 --> 00:11:48.870
can add all those images together. We'll


00:11:48.880 --> 00:11:52.790
have we'll have a almost a complete map


00:11:52.800 --> 00:11:54.710
of the universe in the southern


00:11:54.720 --> 00:11:57.269
hemisphere because uh all the visible


00:11:57.279 --> 00:12:01.750
galaxies will show up. Uh the they we


00:12:01.760 --> 00:12:03.670
won't see the first galaxies. I don't


00:12:03.680 --> 00:12:05.910
think it's going to be powerful enough


00:12:05.920 --> 00:12:09.110
to see those. But uh and we're not sure


00:12:09.120 --> 00:12:10.790
even that the web has seen the first


00:12:10.800 --> 00:12:13.110
galaxies. Uh it's certainly seen some


00:12:13.120 --> 00:12:15.110
galaxies that we think are very early in


00:12:15.120 --> 00:12:16.949
the history of the universe. And I think


00:12:16.959 --> 00:12:19.670
the Verus Cy Rubin observatory will do


00:12:19.680 --> 00:12:22.949
the same thing. Uh but um you know so


00:12:22.959 --> 00:12:26.069
we're not in any sense getting a


00:12:26.079 --> 00:12:29.590
complete sense of the consens sorry a


00:12:29.600 --> 00:12:33.190
complete census of the universe. Uh but


00:12:33.200 --> 00:12:35.829
it's not going to be far off. Uh, and


00:12:35.839 --> 00:12:38.310
that's quite astonishing when you think


00:12:38.320 --> 00:12:40.230
of where we were, you know, well, just a


00:12:40.240 --> 00:12:42.790
few years ago, certainly when I was a a


00:12:42.800 --> 00:12:45.509
young working astronomer in the 1970s, I


00:12:45.519 --> 00:12:47.990
would have had my somebody It would have


00:12:48.000 --> 00:12:50.389
blown my mind to think that we could map


00:12:50.399 --> 00:12:54.230
all the galaxies uh in one hemisphere of


00:12:54.240 --> 00:12:55.750
the universe.


00:12:55.760 --> 00:12:57.509
>> Yeah. Uh, what about the northern


00:12:57.519 --> 00:13:00.389
hemisphere? Is there any


00:13:00.399 --> 00:13:05.990
>> work equivalent? uh the the there is I


00:13:06.000 --> 00:13:08.550
mean the Nancy Roman space telescope


00:13:08.560 --> 00:13:10.949
will look it's also a wide angle


00:13:10.959 --> 00:13:13.670
telescope like the the Ruben Observatory


00:13:13.680 --> 00:13:18.069
instrument is but um it's not as big


00:13:18.079 --> 00:13:22.069
it's a um it is a 2.3 meter telescope


00:13:22.079 --> 00:13:23.990
basically a Hubble Hubble telescope but


00:13:24.000 --> 00:13:26.710
with a wide field of view. Uh so we'll


00:13:26.720 --> 00:13:29.509
we'll certainly see uh pretty deep into


00:13:29.519 --> 00:13:30.949
the northern hemisphere. Whether it will


00:13:30.959 --> 00:13:32.949
go as deep as the Reuben Observatory,


00:13:32.959 --> 00:13:34.310
it's a different matter. I don't think


00:13:34.320 --> 00:13:35.750
it will because it's a much smaller


00:13:35.760 --> 00:13:37.829
telescope, but it is in space and that


00:13:37.839 --> 00:13:40.230
gives it excuse me that gives it


00:13:40.240 --> 00:13:42.389
advantages. There's no atmosphere to to


00:13:42.399 --> 00:13:45.190
get in the way. So that's perhaps the


00:13:45.200 --> 00:13:51.190
best bet. Um the excuse me, the other uh


00:13:51.200 --> 00:13:52.870
big instruments, I mean, there's a


00:13:52.880 --> 00:13:56.710
number of things going on. Um, in terms


00:13:56.720 --> 00:13:58.710
of the two kek telescopes which are in


00:13:58.720 --> 00:14:00.069
the northern hemisphere in Hawaii,


00:14:00.079 --> 00:14:02.550
they're 8 mclass telescopes, but they're


00:14:02.560 --> 00:14:04.310
not wide angle. These are telescopes


00:14:04.320 --> 00:14:07.430
that are built to home in in detail on


00:14:07.440 --> 00:14:09.990
individual objects rather than to do


00:14:10.000 --> 00:14:12.790
wide angle surveys. You need a specially


00:14:12.800 --> 00:14:14.310
designed telescope for that and the


00:14:14.320 --> 00:14:17.829
Reuben is exactly that. Um,


00:14:17.839 --> 00:14:21.430
there isn't really an equivalent. Uh


00:14:21.440 --> 00:14:23.990
there is a wide-angle telescope in La


00:14:24.000 --> 00:14:26.790
Palma which is um the basically the same


00:14:26.800 --> 00:14:28.629
as our UK Schmidt telescope here in


00:14:28.639 --> 00:14:30.150
Australia. It's called the Ocean Schmidt


00:14:30.160 --> 00:14:31.990
telescope. It's much older than our


00:14:32.000 --> 00:14:33.269
Schmidt. In fact, our Schmidt was


00:14:33.279 --> 00:14:35.030
modeled on it and that's a wide angle


00:14:35.040 --> 00:14:37.269
telescope that's surveying the sky, but


00:14:37.279 --> 00:14:39.030
that's looking for things like nearear


00:14:39.040 --> 00:14:40.790
asteroids and things of that sort rather


00:14:40.800 --> 00:14:43.189
than penetrating deep into the universe


00:14:43.199 --> 00:14:45.590
because it's only got a 1.2 2 meter


00:14:45.600 --> 00:14:48.550
aperture diameter much smaller than the


00:14:48.560 --> 00:14:50.389
eight meters that the Rubid telescope


00:14:50.399 --> 00:14:51.509
will have.


00:14:51.519 --> 00:14:53.189
>> Yeah.


00:14:53.199 --> 00:14:55.910
still um what we'll know in 10 years


00:14:55.920 --> 00:14:59.269
time will be extraordinary uh through


00:14:59.279 --> 00:15:01.590
through these two telescopes alone the


00:15:01.600 --> 00:15:05.430
James Webb and Vera Rubin um yeah who


00:15:05.440 --> 00:15:08.550
knows what they're going to un unveil uh


00:15:08.560 --> 00:15:11.430
and and what what have you know Vera


00:15:11.440 --> 00:15:12.949
Rubin's first photograph was a


00:15:12.959 --> 00:15:17.750
revelation uh and what James Webb is um


00:15:17.760 --> 00:15:20.230
is is shelling out is is extraordinary


00:15:20.240 --> 00:15:23.910
it It's It's like um I don't know,


00:15:23.920 --> 00:15:25.750
Taylor Swift. It's a hit record every


00:15:25.760 --> 00:15:27.910
time that every time they release a


00:15:27.920 --> 00:15:29.110
picture.


00:15:29.120 --> 00:15:31.990
>> It's uh it's incredible. So, Eli, the


00:15:32.000 --> 00:15:34.790
next decade will be extraordinary. Um


00:15:34.800 --> 00:15:37.509
so, just, you know, keep an eye on it


00:15:37.519 --> 00:15:39.750
would be my advice. And thanks for the


00:15:39.760 --> 00:15:42.310
question. This is Space Nuts with Andrew


00:15:42.320 --> 00:15:45.990
Dunley and Professor Fred Watson.


00:15:46.000 --> 00:15:47.509
Let's take a break from the show to tell


00:15:47.519 --> 00:15:50.949
you about our sponsor, NordVPN.


00:15:50.959 --> 00:15:52.710
Now, if you've ever felt like your


00:15:52.720 --> 00:15:54.550
online privacy is slipping through the


00:15:54.560 --> 00:15:57.350
cracks, then you're not alone. Hackers,


00:15:57.360 --> 00:15:59.030
scammers, harvesters, they're all out


00:15:59.040 --> 00:16:01.189
there trying to get your private info.


00:16:01.199 --> 00:16:03.189
Whether that's your passwords or your


00:16:03.199 --> 00:16:05.430
personal details to sell on the dark web


00:16:05.440 --> 00:16:08.389
or to use themselves to access your bank


00:16:08.399 --> 00:16:10.470
accounts, credit card details, and who


00:16:10.480 --> 00:16:13.110
knows what else. But you can protect


00:16:13.120 --> 00:16:15.749
yourself with NordVPN.


00:16:15.759 --> 00:16:18.790
You can take control at home or or more


00:16:18.800 --> 00:16:20.629
importantly when you're out in public.


00:16:20.639 --> 00:16:25.269
using free Wi-Fi right now. Uh using the


00:16:25.279 --> 00:16:27.910
exclusive Space Nuts offer, you can


00:16:27.920 --> 00:16:30.629
secure and receive four extra months for


00:16:30.639 --> 00:16:34.150
free on a NordVPN.com


00:16:34.160 --> 00:16:37.030
plan. That's over 2 years of top tier


00:16:37.040 --> 00:16:41.189
online protection. NordVPN encrypts your


00:16:41.199 --> 00:16:43.110
internet connection, hides your IP


00:16:43.120 --> 00:16:46.470
address, and offers access to over 7,700


00:16:46.480 --> 00:16:49.509
servers around the world. Plus, with


00:16:49.519 --> 00:16:52.150
features like threat protection pro,


00:16:52.160 --> 00:16:53.670
meshet,


00:16:53.680 --> 00:16:56.710
ultra fast speeds via Nord links, your


00:16:56.720 --> 00:16:59.430
digital life stays private and


00:16:59.440 --> 00:17:02.710
efficient. So, don't miss out. Visit


00:17:02.720 --> 00:17:05.990
nordvpn.com/spacenuts


00:17:06.000 --> 00:17:08.630
and enter the code spacenuts to claim


00:17:08.640 --> 00:17:11.110
this deal. Remember, there's a 30-day


00:17:11.120 --> 00:17:13.590
money back guarantee, so it's riskfree


00:17:13.600 --> 00:17:16.789
to try. Stay safe, stay private, and


00:17:16.799 --> 00:17:19.110
browse with confidence. That's


00:17:19.120 --> 00:17:22.710
nordvpn.com/spacenuts


00:17:22.720 --> 00:17:25.429
and use the code word spacen nuts.


00:17:25.439 --> 00:17:30.230
nordvpn.com/spacenuts.


00:17:30.240 --> 00:17:33.110
>> 3 2 1


00:17:33.120 --> 00:17:34.630
>> Spacenuts.


00:17:34.640 --> 00:17:37.350
I think we have an audio question now.


00:17:37.360 --> 00:17:39.110
This one comes from one of our regulars


00:17:39.120 --> 00:17:40.150
as well.


00:17:40.160 --> 00:17:42.789
>> Hello Fred, Andrew, Jonty, and Heidi.


00:17:42.799 --> 00:17:45.669
This is Robert from the Netherlands.


00:17:45.679 --> 00:17:48.710
I have a question for you guys about the


00:17:48.720 --> 00:17:51.190
emptiness of space.


00:17:51.200 --> 00:17:54.230
Now, everybody is always saying that


00:17:54.240 --> 00:17:56.470
space is totally empty, right? One


00:17:56.480 --> 00:17:59.110
proton per square breeder, something


00:17:59.120 --> 00:18:03.510
like that. However, not that long ago,


00:18:03.520 --> 00:18:06.070
scientists did discover the Higs Bzon


00:18:06.080 --> 00:18:10.789
particle, the God particle, if you will.


00:18:10.799 --> 00:18:14.549
So apparently everything is on this grid


00:18:14.559 --> 00:18:18.789
of hex boss, but I'm not exactly an


00:18:18.799 --> 00:18:21.029
expert here. I'm just curious if you


00:18:21.039 --> 00:18:22.470
guys could shed some lights on this


00:18:22.480 --> 00:18:25.669
concept for me. So is it just an


00:18:25.679 --> 00:18:28.230
enormous field of these very regular


00:18:28.240 --> 00:18:31.430
hobbons everywhere in desal spaces or


00:18:31.440 --> 00:18:34.070
are they more numerous or less dense in


00:18:34.080 --> 00:18:37.270
certain parts? Is the void between


00:18:37.280 --> 00:18:40.310
galaxies actually a void? or is it an


00:18:40.320 --> 00:18:43.909
empty field of God particles?


00:18:43.919 --> 00:18:45.909
I really hope you can shed some lights.


00:18:45.919 --> 00:18:49.350
Thank you guys so much for answering.


00:18:49.360 --> 00:18:51.029
Thank you, Robert. Good to hear from


00:18:51.039 --> 00:18:55.350
you. Uh the emptiness of space. So he


00:18:55.360 --> 00:18:58.230
said one proton per square meter. Is


00:18:58.240 --> 00:19:01.350
that um a reasonable


00:19:01.360 --> 00:19:04.070
>> uh yeah per cubic meter? something


00:19:04.080 --> 00:19:06.070
something like that. Um


00:19:06.080 --> 00:19:09.990
>> yeah um it's uh it's of that order I


00:19:10.000 --> 00:19:14.630
think in in intergalactic space. Um


00:19:14.640 --> 00:19:18.870
uh but uh Robert's right in the sense


00:19:18.880 --> 00:19:24.070
that the Higs field which is the other


00:19:24.080 --> 00:19:28.390
way of looking at the Higs Bzon


00:19:28.400 --> 00:19:31.669
permeates basically permeates empty


00:19:31.679 --> 00:19:36.470
space. Um so


00:19:36.480 --> 00:19:39.669
uh this is all about the duality of


00:19:39.679 --> 00:19:41.510
particles


00:19:41.520 --> 00:19:44.789
uh with waves and with what we call


00:19:44.799 --> 00:19:48.070
fields. Um and we I mean we imagine


00:19:48.080 --> 00:19:49.990
fields when we think of gravitation


00:19:50.000 --> 00:19:52.230
because we think of a a gravitational


00:19:52.240 --> 00:19:55.909
field as a as a as a a


00:19:55.919 --> 00:19:59.110
sort of a a well if I can put it that


00:19:59.120 --> 00:20:01.750
way in a in a trampoline. Uh the


00:20:01.760 --> 00:20:03.029
trampolines, the field, you put


00:20:03.039 --> 00:20:05.190
something in it and it it distorts it.


00:20:05.200 --> 00:20:05.510
>> Yeah.


00:20:05.520 --> 00:20:10.070
>> Uh so with the Higs uh Bzon, the Higs


00:20:10.080 --> 00:20:14.470
field uh is this sort of invisible. It's


00:20:14.480 --> 00:20:16.470
been described as a something like


00:20:16.480 --> 00:20:21.110
molasses or syrup. Uh that what actually


00:20:21.120 --> 00:20:23.830
give particles their mass because um


00:20:23.840 --> 00:20:25.750
they move slowly through it because they


00:20:25.760 --> 00:20:28.549
get sticky. Uh that's one way of looking


00:20:28.559 --> 00:20:32.390
at it. Um but uh the Higs Bzon is


00:20:32.400 --> 00:20:36.470
essentially a um in in a in a sense uh a


00:20:36.480 --> 00:20:39.830
ripple in the Higs field. The Higs field


00:20:39.840 --> 00:20:43.270
fills space and the Higs Bzons uh are


00:20:43.280 --> 00:20:45.990
ripples in it. That's one way uh to look


00:20:46.000 --> 00:20:52.070
at it. Um it's it's uh


00:20:52.080 --> 00:20:54.470
the I think what Robert's interested in


00:20:54.480 --> 00:20:58.789
is the density of these Bzons.


00:20:58.799 --> 00:21:02.070
uh whether they are uniformly


00:21:02.080 --> 00:21:05.029
uh distributed through space or whether


00:21:05.039 --> 00:21:10.470
we're talking about um you know uh Bzons


00:21:10.480 --> 00:21:14.789
uh that are


00:21:14.799 --> 00:21:16.950
more dense in some places than than


00:21:16.960 --> 00:21:21.510
others. uh and I I guess the the bottom


00:21:21.520 --> 00:21:22.950
line is that you would expect there to


00:21:22.960 --> 00:21:27.350
be more Bzons where there is more uh


00:21:27.360 --> 00:21:30.549
more uh what you might call normal


00:21:30.559 --> 00:21:32.710
matter the the quarks and normal


00:21:32.720 --> 00:21:34.950
particles but that might not be the


00:21:34.960 --> 00:21:36.950
case. Uh I need to look at that a little


00:21:36.960 --> 00:21:38.549
bit more carefully Andrew as you can


00:21:38.559 --> 00:21:41.430
probably tell uh to to find out what the


00:21:41.440 --> 00:21:44.470
distribution of Higs Bzons are. If you


00:21:44.480 --> 00:21:46.070
assume the Higs field is uniform


00:21:46.080 --> 00:21:47.669
throughout space, which I think it might


00:21:47.679 --> 00:21:48.950
be.


00:21:48.960 --> 00:21:50.630
>> Yeah, I suppose so. I mean, it's a


00:21:50.640 --> 00:21:52.390
complicated area. You're talking about


00:21:52.400 --> 00:21:54.230
particle physics, aren't you? Really?


00:21:54.240 --> 00:21:55.510
It's um it's not


00:21:55.520 --> 00:21:57.029
>> I believe so. Yes.


00:21:57.039 --> 00:22:00.789
>> It's not it's not basic maths. So, um


00:22:00.799 --> 00:22:02.230
>> yeah, it's particle physics we're


00:22:02.240 --> 00:22:04.310
talking about. And um as as I've said


00:22:04.320 --> 00:22:05.830
before, the disclaimer is I'm not a


00:22:05.840 --> 00:22:09.430
particle physicist. I've been to been to


00:22:09.440 --> 00:22:12.470
CERN a few times and had my mind blown


00:22:12.480 --> 00:22:13.830
by what they do there at the Large


00:22:13.840 --> 00:22:15.669
Hadron Collider. In fact, I've been


00:22:15.679 --> 00:22:17.909
underground in the Ladron Collider, but


00:22:17.919 --> 00:22:19.750
I'm still not a physicist, a particle


00:22:19.760 --> 00:22:23.270
physicist. I uh learn what they they


00:22:23.280 --> 00:22:25.990
tell me and kind of hope for the best.


00:22:26.000 --> 00:22:28.390
>> Yeah. Aren't they making a larger Hedron


00:22:28.400 --> 00:22:30.549
collider?


00:22:30.559 --> 00:22:34.950
uh they are planning one um something


00:22:34.960 --> 00:22:36.950
called


00:22:36.960 --> 00:22:38.470
uh


00:22:38.480 --> 00:22:40.230
I can't remember it's something like the


00:22:40.240 --> 00:22:42.470
large you know the future large collider


00:22:42.480 --> 00:22:44.870
I think something like that uh which


00:22:44.880 --> 00:22:46.870
whereas the large hydron collider has a


00:22:46.880 --> 00:22:49.110
diameter or a circumference of 27


00:22:49.120 --> 00:22:52.789
kilometers this is 100 kilometers


00:22:52.799 --> 00:22:55.110
um if they ever get the money for it


00:22:55.120 --> 00:22:57.029
they are planning an opening ceremony


00:22:57.039 --> 00:23:00.470
for it in 2070


00:23:00.480 --> 00:23:03.350
It's called the uh future circular


00:23:03.360 --> 00:23:03.750
collider.


00:23:03.760 --> 00:23:05.430
>> Future circular collider. That's it.


00:23:05.440 --> 00:23:08.630
>> Um 91 km ring successor to the large


00:23:08.640 --> 00:23:11.029
hedron collider.


00:23:11.039 --> 00:23:15.350
>> And they expect it to be approved.


00:23:15.360 --> 00:23:18.470
Then the 2728 financial year by the look


00:23:18.480 --> 00:23:19.909
of it. Construction starting in the


00:23:19.919 --> 00:23:22.789
2030s. So it's a little way off.


00:23:22.799 --> 00:23:25.029
>> Completion 2070.


00:23:25.039 --> 00:23:26.549
>> 2070.


00:23:26.559 --> 00:23:27.029
Lime.


00:23:27.039 --> 00:23:28.630
>> Yeah.


00:23:28.640 --> 00:23:31.990
That's where the last let's not hold it


00:23:32.000 --> 00:23:35.590
is what I saw. Yeah. So I don't think um


00:23:35.600 --> 00:23:37.590
I I you know even with the best will in


00:23:37.600 --> 00:23:40.230
the world space will probably have


00:23:40.240 --> 00:23:42.149
dwindled to an audience measured in


00:23:42.159 --> 00:23:44.230
single digits by then. So


00:23:44.240 --> 00:23:47.909
>> possibly possibly so yes uh more could


00:23:47.919 --> 00:23:49.430
pick up new listeners along the way but


00:23:49.440 --> 00:23:51.990
we won't know about it. But um I I


00:23:52.000 --> 00:23:53.750
suppose the other side to this question


00:23:53.760 --> 00:23:56.710
though is that we do see concentrations


00:23:56.720 --> 00:23:59.909
of particles in some parts of the


00:23:59.919 --> 00:24:02.310
universe uh like dark matter seems to


00:24:02.320 --> 00:24:05.350
concentrate around galaxies


00:24:05.360 --> 00:24:06.310
kind of thing. Is that


00:24:06.320 --> 00:24:07.110
>> Yeah,


00:24:07.120 --> 00:24:09.510
>> that a different kettle of fish.


00:24:09.520 --> 00:24:11.830
>> I I think so because we're talking about


00:24:11.840 --> 00:24:14.950
something that is um a property of the


00:24:14.960 --> 00:24:19.669
universe itself almost. Um,


00:24:19.679 --> 00:24:24.149
so that the Higs field is everywhere.


00:24:24.159 --> 00:24:26.390
>> Okay. Gotcha. I understand. No, I get


00:24:26.400 --> 00:24:27.909
it. I get it. Yeah. All right.


00:24:27.919 --> 00:24:28.549
>> Yeah.


00:24:28.559 --> 00:24:31.590
>> So, Robert, the answer is um maybe


00:24:31.600 --> 00:24:33.830
possibly could be. Uh, we need to do a


00:24:33.840 --> 00:24:36.390
bit more homework by the sound of it.


00:24:36.400 --> 00:24:37.830
>> We might be able to get back to you on


00:24:37.840 --> 00:24:39.350
that.


00:24:39.360 --> 00:24:41.909
>> Just Fred's writing a note so he doesn't


00:24:41.919 --> 00:24:43.990
forget. Except he'll forget where the


00:24:44.000 --> 00:24:45.510
note is. Shh.


00:24:45.520 --> 00:24:47.029
>> All right.


00:24:47.039 --> 00:24:49.430
It's in this book.


00:24:49.440 --> 00:24:52.710
Thanks, Robert.


00:24:52.720 --> 00:24:55.590
>> Okay, we checked all four systems and


00:24:55.600 --> 00:24:57.029
>> Space Nets.


00:24:57.039 --> 00:25:00.390
>> And our final question comes from Renie.


00:25:00.400 --> 00:25:02.789
Uh, this is a really interesting


00:25:02.799 --> 00:25:04.230
question because he says, I'm going to


00:25:04.240 --> 00:25:06.149
play devil's advocate with this


00:25:06.159 --> 00:25:09.830
question. How will finding out what dark


00:25:09.840 --> 00:25:12.710
matter and dark energy really are help


00:25:12.720 --> 00:25:16.789
the earth and all uh of its life now and


00:25:16.799 --> 00:25:19.269
in the future? Renie from California.


00:25:19.279 --> 00:25:21.510
We've had a few US questions this week.


00:25:21.520 --> 00:25:24.710
That's nice. Two from Cali. Uh so yeah,


00:25:24.720 --> 00:25:26.230
what difference will it make if we find


00:25:26.240 --> 00:25:30.070
this stuff to Earth and life as it is


00:25:30.080 --> 00:25:33.510
now and in the future?


00:25:33.520 --> 00:25:37.430
Um so um yeah if if we magically did


00:25:37.440 --> 00:25:40.070
find the answer to these things and we


00:25:40.080 --> 00:25:43.430
will eventually uh over a period of time


00:25:43.440 --> 00:25:45.510
I hope it's not till not be I hope it's


00:25:45.520 --> 00:25:49.350
before 2070 because I want to know um it


00:25:49.360 --> 00:25:51.990
it what it will do will be complete our


00:25:52.000 --> 00:25:54.950
understanding of the universe in a way


00:25:54.960 --> 00:25:58.630
that it it's not the case at the moment.


00:25:58.640 --> 00:26:03.190
So um it it basically refineses our


00:26:03.200 --> 00:26:04.789
understanding


00:26:04.799 --> 00:26:07.269
uh in a if I can put it this way in a


00:26:07.279 --> 00:26:11.510
way that's similar to the way general


00:26:11.520 --> 00:26:13.190
relativity


00:26:13.200 --> 00:26:17.830
refined it back in 1915.


00:26:17.840 --> 00:26:21.029
Um, so the fact that we suddenly


00:26:21.039 --> 00:26:23.669
understood gravity, the way gravity


00:26:23.679 --> 00:26:26.870
works in a new light, which is what


00:26:26.880 --> 00:26:32.870
general relativity did um meant that uh


00:26:32.880 --> 00:26:35.750
yes, the physicists could go away happy


00:26:35.760 --> 00:26:38.630
because they solved a problem. There


00:26:38.640 --> 00:26:41.269
were a number of problems that Newtonian


00:26:41.279 --> 00:26:43.430
gravity couldn't couldn't help with


00:26:43.440 --> 00:26:46.470
which were solved by Einsteinian


00:26:46.480 --> 00:26:47.830
gravity.


00:26:47.840 --> 00:26:51.909
So um but that didn't seem to offer any


00:26:51.919 --> 00:26:55.029
future benefits for humankind. But here


00:26:55.039 --> 00:26:57.830
we are rather more than 100 years later,


00:26:57.840 --> 00:27:03.590
110 years later and we have um tools


00:27:03.600 --> 00:27:06.950
which rely absolutely on general


00:27:06.960 --> 00:27:08.549
relativity. And the one I'm thinking of


00:27:08.559 --> 00:27:12.310
most commonly is uh GPS


00:27:12.320 --> 00:27:15.750
uh because our position finding um


00:27:15.760 --> 00:27:18.549
software simply would not work without


00:27:18.559 --> 00:27:20.950
general relativity. you'd have errors in


00:27:20.960 --> 00:27:23.750
the region of 10 kilometers which is not


00:27:23.760 --> 00:27:26.789
kind of what you want with GPS but that


00:27:26.799 --> 00:27:31.350
took a 100 years and so Renie that's the


00:27:31.360 --> 00:27:33.190
sort of time scale I think on which you


00:27:33.200 --> 00:27:34.950
have to be optimistic about the way it


00:27:34.960 --> 00:27:37.590
might help humankind or life on earth


00:27:37.600 --> 00:27:40.390
generally because if we become


00:27:40.400 --> 00:27:43.590
responsible um a responsible species on


00:27:43.600 --> 00:27:44.870
our planet we're going to help the whole


00:27:44.880 --> 00:27:48.230
planet if we if we live sustainably and


00:27:48.240 --> 00:27:50.870
um live alongside inside uh all our


00:27:50.880 --> 00:27:54.149
companion organisms on on this planet.


00:27:54.159 --> 00:27:56.870
So uh yeah, so I I think um what you


00:27:56.880 --> 00:27:59.190
can't say is that it won't help them.


00:27:59.200 --> 00:28:01.590
That's the thing. You can't say that it


00:28:01.600 --> 00:28:04.549
will either. Uh but there's a good


00:28:04.559 --> 00:28:07.510
chance that in the same way that um


00:28:07.520 --> 00:28:09.750
something as obstruuse as general


00:28:09.760 --> 00:28:11.750
relativity actually comes into


00:28:11.760 --> 00:28:14.630
everybody's everyday lifeund odd years


00:28:14.640 --> 00:28:17.510
later. I think that's the the model and


00:28:17.520 --> 00:28:21.110
it's one reason why why deep research


00:28:21.120 --> 00:28:22.630
like this is funded. It's why


00:28:22.640 --> 00:28:24.789
fundamental research that is just


00:28:24.799 --> 00:28:27.190
knowledge for its own sake at the moment


00:28:27.200 --> 00:28:28.710
why it's funded because you never know


00:28:28.720 --> 00:28:30.710
what the spin-offs might be.


00:28:30.720 --> 00:28:33.029
>> Absolutely. Uh and you can look back in


00:28:33.039 --> 00:28:34.710
history at some of the great discoveries


00:28:34.720 --> 00:28:37.830
and how they've they've changed things


00:28:37.840 --> 00:28:42.149
on Earth and have changed human life. Um


00:28:42.159 --> 00:28:44.710
>> I'm just trying to think of one. Well,


00:28:44.720 --> 00:28:45.909
electricity for a start.


00:28:45.919 --> 00:28:48.149
>> Yeah. Well, they, you know, it was just


00:28:48.159 --> 00:28:50.470
physicists playing around in the early


00:28:50.480 --> 00:28:52.230
19th century. Oh, this is really


00:28:52.240 --> 00:28:53.269
interesting.


00:28:53.279 --> 00:28:55.909
>> Um, nobody ever thought we'd use it like


00:28:55.919 --> 00:28:57.510
we do today.


00:28:57.520 --> 00:28:59.350
>> And I suppose one of the this is


00:28:59.360 --> 00:29:03.029
probably a a fundamental example. Uh, as


00:29:03.039 --> 00:29:07.350
we learn things, we learn things. So it


00:29:07.360 --> 00:29:09.350
expands our minds. It expands our


00:29:09.360 --> 00:29:11.190
inquisitiveness. It expands our


00:29:11.200 --> 00:29:13.830
intelligence. It it it it enables


00:29:13.840 --> 00:29:17.669
humanity to understand more about itself


00:29:17.679 --> 00:29:19.350
and its place in the universe. You know,


00:29:19.360 --> 00:29:22.389
you go back to 1543


00:29:22.399 --> 00:29:23.990
when Capernicus


00:29:24.000 --> 00:29:26.149
>> found that the earth was not the center


00:29:26.159 --> 00:29:29.029
of the universe. I think he got shouted


00:29:29.039 --> 00:29:31.430
down pretty heavily for that. But that's


00:29:31.440 --> 00:29:33.750
the truth. We know that now. Uh there


00:29:33.760 --> 00:29:36.789
was I can't remember who it was but um


00:29:36.799 --> 00:29:38.549
another thing that goes back quite a way


00:29:38.559 --> 00:29:41.830
when the discovery was made that our son


00:29:41.840 --> 00:29:43.909
is actually a star. I mean for a long


00:29:43.919 --> 00:29:46.310
time we didn't know that.


00:29:46.320 --> 00:29:48.230
>> You know it's it's about knowledge as


00:29:48.240 --> 00:29:50.149
much as anything. I think


00:29:50.159 --> 00:29:51.510
>> Yeah. Yep.


00:29:51.520 --> 00:29:52.549
>> I love that one though.


00:29:52.559 --> 00:29:54.230
>> That's right. Yeah.


00:29:54.240 --> 00:29:54.630
>> The sun.


00:29:54.640 --> 00:29:55.430
>> It's great.


00:29:55.440 --> 00:29:56.149
>> Yeah.


00:29:56.159 --> 00:29:56.710
>> I think


00:29:56.720 --> 00:29:57.830
>> you can look it up. It's online


00:29:57.840 --> 00:29:59.350
somewhere. I did it as a quiz question


00:29:59.360 --> 00:30:01.990
once on the radio and um got a great


00:30:02.000 --> 00:30:04.310
response to that cuz people just in the


00:30:04.320 --> 00:30:06.470
modern era never thought that there


00:30:06.480 --> 00:30:08.149
would have been a time where people look


00:30:08.159 --> 00:30:12.149
at this this hot ball in the sky and go


00:30:12.159 --> 00:30:15.190
what is that? Um and you know looking at


00:30:15.200 --> 00:30:16.789
all the other stars not making the


00:30:16.799 --> 00:30:19.269
correlation they just didn't know. It's


00:30:19.279 --> 00:30:22.149
um it was incredible. So I suppose Renie


00:30:22.159 --> 00:30:24.389
it's it's it's about knowledge. It's


00:30:24.399 --> 00:30:26.630
about expanding our understanding of


00:30:26.640 --> 00:30:28.789
life, the universe, and everything and


00:30:28.799 --> 00:30:31.110
not stopping at 42.


00:30:31.120 --> 00:30:34.710
Um, that's the way I look at it.


00:30:34.720 --> 00:30:36.470
I think you're and I think you're


00:30:36.480 --> 00:30:38.549
absolutely right. I think um, you know,


00:30:38.559 --> 00:30:40.389
both that's two sides of the same thing.


00:30:40.399 --> 00:30:43.350
We're we're we but it's why we why we do


00:30:43.360 --> 00:30:45.029
this sort of thing. It's why it's we're


00:30:45.039 --> 00:30:46.630
a curious species and


00:30:46.640 --> 00:30:47.190
>> absolutely


00:30:47.200 --> 00:30:48.630
>> knowledge is power. Yeah.


00:30:48.640 --> 00:30:50.789
>> Yeah. Yeah. That's another thing. Yeah.


00:30:50.799 --> 00:30:53.110
Absolutely true, Renie. Great question.


00:30:53.120 --> 00:30:55.590
good one for discussion and debate and


00:30:55.600 --> 00:30:57.029
keep them coming. If you'd like to send


00:30:57.039 --> 00:30:59.990
questions into us, um you can do so


00:31:00.000 --> 00:31:01.590
through our website,


00:31:01.600 --> 00:31:03.430
spacenutspodcast.com,


00:31:03.440 --> 00:31:06.870
spacenuts.io, they're the two URLs. And


00:31:06.880 --> 00:31:08.389
while you're there, have a look around.


00:31:08.399 --> 00:31:10.870
The AMA button at the top, ask me


00:31:10.880 --> 00:31:12.710
anything is where you send your


00:31:12.720 --> 00:31:15.029
questions. Ask me anything. Uh text or


00:31:15.039 --> 00:31:16.549
audio, don't forget to tell us who you


00:31:16.559 --> 00:31:19.190
are and where you're from. And uh you


00:31:19.200 --> 00:31:21.110
might want to click on the support our


00:31:21.120 --> 00:31:24.389
podcast button uh and and help us out if


00:31:24.399 --> 00:31:26.950
you if you so desire. Never ever going


00:31:26.960 --> 00:31:29.269
to make it mandatory, but uh there are


00:31:29.279 --> 00:31:32.389
advantages to becoming a a a supporter


00:31:32.399 --> 00:31:34.950
of uh of the podcast. So um check that


00:31:34.960 --> 00:31:36.950
out as well and visit the shop while


00:31:36.960 --> 00:31:39.110
you're there. That also helps us. Buy a


00:31:39.120 --> 00:31:42.470
sticker, buy a cap, buy a shirt, buy


00:31:42.480 --> 00:31:44.549
whatever. We should have space nut


00:31:44.559 --> 00:31:46.389
sunscreen, you know. It would make


00:31:46.399 --> 00:31:49.430
sense. Anyway, uh you can do it all on


00:31:49.440 --> 00:31:51.190
our website. Fred, thank you so much.


00:31:51.200 --> 00:31:53.669
Always a pleasure.


00:31:53.679 --> 00:31:55.430
>> Good to talk, Andrew. And um I'm sure


00:31:55.440 --> 00:31:57.430
we'll do it again soon.


00:31:57.440 --> 00:31:59.909
>> Yes, I'm sure we will. Uh could be a few


00:31:59.919 --> 00:32:01.909
minutes, could be a week, who knows. Uh


00:32:01.919 --> 00:32:03.590
and Hugh in the studio, thanks to him


00:32:03.600 --> 00:32:05.269
for doing everything he does. We don't


00:32:05.279 --> 00:32:07.350
know what that is, but we appreciate it.


00:32:07.360 --> 00:32:09.110
And from me, Andrew Dunley, thanks for


00:32:09.120 --> 00:32:10.710
your company. See you on the next


00:32:10.720 --> 00:32:13.029
episode of Space Nuts. Bye-bye.


00:32:13.039 --> 00:32:15.430
>> Space Nuts. You'll be listening to the


00:32:15.440 --> 00:32:18.389
Space Nuts podcast


00:32:18.399 --> 00:32:21.430
>> available at Apple Podcasts, Spotify,


00:32:21.440 --> 00:32:24.070
iHeart Radio, or your favorite podcast


00:32:24.080 --> 00:32:26.470
player. You can also stream on demand at


00:32:26.480 --> 00:32:29.350
byes.com. This has been another quality


00:32:29.360 --> 00:32:33.880
podcast production from byes.com.