Astrobiology Adventures: Exploring Life Beyond Earth | Space Nuts: Astronomy Insights & Cosmic...
Astrobiology: The Search for Life Beyond Earth In this special edition of Space Nuts , hosts Andrew Dunkley and Professor Jonti Horner delve into the captivating field of astrobiology. With Professor Fred Watson away, Jonty brings his expertise to explore the complexities of life beyond our planet, the conditions necessary for its existence, and the ongoing quest to find it.
Episode Highlights:
- The Evolution of Exoplanet Discovery: Andrew and Jonty discuss the advancements in technology that have allowed astronomers to discover thousands of exoplanets, with a particular focus on Earth-like planets that could potentially harbour life.
- The Challenges of Finding Life: The hosts address the difficulties in the search for extraterrestrial life, including the implications of the absence of evidence and the complexities of distinguishing between life forms.
- Life in Our Solar System: Jonty shares insights on why we might find life within our solar system, particularly on Mars and the icy moons of the outer planets, and how robotic exploration is key to this search.
- Defining Habitable Zones: The conversation shifts to the criteria that define a habitable zone around stars and the importance of factors such as stellar type, distance, and planetary characteristics in the search for life.
- Philosophical Implications: The hosts ponder the philosophical questions surrounding the existence of life and the potential for advanced civilisations, and whether humanity is prepared for contact with extraterrestrial intelligence.
For more Space Nuts, including our continuously updating newsfeed and to listen to all our episodes, visit our website. (https://www.spacenutspodcast.com/) Follow us on social media at SpaceNutsPod on Facebook, Instagram, and more. We love engaging with our community, so be sure to drop us a message or comment on your favourite platform.
If you’d like to help support Space Nuts and join our growing family of insiders for commercial-free episodes and more, visit spacenutspodcast.com/about (https://www.spacenutspodcast.com/about) .
Stay curious, keep looking up, and join us next time for more stellar insights and cosmic wonders. Until then, clear skies and happy stargazing.
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/space-nuts-astronomy-insights-cosmic-discoveries--2631155/support (https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/space-nuts-astronomy-insights-cosmic-discoveries--2631155/support?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss) .
Chapters:
- Introduction to Astrobiology
- Technological Advances in Exoplanet Discovery
- Searching for Life in Our Solar System
- Defining Habitable Zones and Their Importance
- The Philosophical Questions of Extraterrestrial Life
Episode link: https://play.headliner.app/episode/33420280?utm_source=youtube
Kind: captions
Language: en
00:00:00.160 --> 00:00:01.829
Hi there. Thanks for joining us again.
00:00:01.839 --> 00:00:04.309
This is Space Nuts, where we talk
00:00:04.319 --> 00:00:07.590
astronomy and space science. And my name
00:00:07.600 --> 00:00:09.270
is Andrew Dunley, your host. Great to
00:00:09.280 --> 00:00:11.669
have your company. Now, normally I'd be
00:00:11.679 --> 00:00:13.830
joined by Professor Fred Watson, but he
00:00:13.840 --> 00:00:16.550
is away visiting family at the moment.
00:00:16.560 --> 00:00:18.630
And because he was going to be away and
00:00:18.640 --> 00:00:20.310
then I'm going to be away and we tried
00:00:20.320 --> 00:00:22.630
to cram episodes in and uh we just we
00:00:22.640 --> 00:00:24.310
couldn't do enough in the amount of time
00:00:24.320 --> 00:00:27.349
we had, uh we invited Professor Jotty
00:00:27.359 --> 00:00:29.269
Horner to join us and uh we're going to
00:00:29.279 --> 00:00:30.790
do some specials. You might have heard
00:00:30.800 --> 00:00:33.750
the last one, uh which was very engaging
00:00:33.760 --> 00:00:35.430
and interesting and fascinating and
00:00:35.440 --> 00:00:39.110
long. Uh this time we we're going down a
00:00:39.120 --> 00:00:40.630
different road. We're going to focus the
00:00:40.640 --> 00:00:44.470
whole program on astro biology. Strap
00:00:44.480 --> 00:00:46.709
in. We'll do that right now.
00:00:46.719 --> 00:00:51.510
>> 15 seconds. Guidance is internal. 10 9
00:00:51.520 --> 00:00:53.270
Ignition sequence start.
00:00:53.280 --> 00:00:54.229
>> Space nuts.
00:00:54.239 --> 00:00:56.790
>> 5 4 3 2
00:00:56.800 --> 00:00:59.189
>> 1 2 3 4 5 5 4 3 2 1
00:00:59.199 --> 00:01:00.310
>> Space nuts.
00:01:00.320 --> 00:01:02.549
>> Astronauts report. It feels good.
00:01:02.559 --> 00:01:04.070
>> And here he is again. Professor of
00:01:04.080 --> 00:01:05.910
astrophysics at the University of
00:01:05.920 --> 00:01:08.230
Southern Queensland, Johnny her. Good
00:01:08.240 --> 00:01:08.950
day, Johnny.
00:01:08.960 --> 00:01:10.070
>> Good day. How are you going?
00:01:10.080 --> 00:01:13.429
>> I'm well. Good to see you again. And uh
00:01:13.439 --> 00:01:14.950
we've got a lot to talk about. So I
00:01:14.960 --> 00:01:16.469
think we're going to just dive on in.
00:01:16.479 --> 00:01:19.429
Now in preparation for this astrobiology
00:01:19.439 --> 00:01:22.550
chat, you sent me a paper that you wrote
00:01:22.560 --> 00:01:25.350
uh and published on the archive website.
00:01:25.360 --> 00:01:27.830
Uh it's um
00:01:27.840 --> 00:01:28.710
>> ancient.
00:01:28.720 --> 00:01:31.910
>> Yeah, it it's it's coming up on 16 years
00:01:31.920 --> 00:01:33.510
since you wrote that. But one of the
00:01:33.520 --> 00:01:36.789
interesting parts was uh look, it's been
00:01:36.799 --> 00:01:38.469
a couple of decades now that we've been
00:01:38.479 --> 00:01:40.630
finding exoplanets. And as technology
00:01:40.640 --> 00:01:42.789
improves, it's only a matter of time
00:01:42.799 --> 00:01:44.870
before we start finding Earthlike
00:01:44.880 --> 00:01:47.350
planets. And that's really going to make
00:01:47.360 --> 00:01:49.749
the search for life beyond our solar
00:01:49.759 --> 00:01:53.030
system really really interesting. So
00:01:53.040 --> 00:01:54.950
those 16 years have passed. Have we got
00:01:54.960 --> 00:01:57.030
the Have we got the equipment yet? I
00:01:57.040 --> 00:01:59.749
suspect we have. It depends where you're
00:01:59.759 --> 00:02:01.910
looking, I think. I mean, in terms of
00:02:01.920 --> 00:02:03.270
looking at the planets around other
00:02:03.280 --> 00:02:05.429
stars, we can now learn a lot more about
00:02:05.439 --> 00:02:07.429
them than we could 16 years ago when I
00:02:07.439 --> 00:02:10.229
wrote the paper. that particular paper,
00:02:10.239 --> 00:02:12.550
but we're still not there yet. And it's
00:02:12.560 --> 00:02:15.110
a perpetual thing. No matter how hard
00:02:15.120 --> 00:02:17.510
you work, there's always more to do. The
00:02:17.520 --> 00:02:18.790
other thing that goes along with it,
00:02:18.800 --> 00:02:20.550
which I think is worth saying right up
00:02:20.560 --> 00:02:22.390
at the very start, is that searching for
00:02:22.400 --> 00:02:24.790
life elsewhere is going to be one of the
00:02:24.800 --> 00:02:27.190
hardest things we've ever done. And
00:02:27.200 --> 00:02:29.830
absence of evidence is not necessarily
00:02:29.840 --> 00:02:33.110
evidence of absence. What I mean by that
00:02:33.120 --> 00:02:35.670
is we could in a remarkable turn of
00:02:35.680 --> 00:02:37.430
events in the next few months find life
00:02:37.440 --> 00:02:39.190
elsewhere. you know, that's kind of the
00:02:39.200 --> 00:02:42.150
ultimate extreme soonest possible. Um,
00:02:42.160 --> 00:02:44.710
very unlikely to happen. Alternatively,
00:02:44.720 --> 00:02:47.270
we might still be looking in a century.
00:02:47.280 --> 00:02:49.350
If we're still looking in a century,
00:02:49.360 --> 00:02:50.869
that doesn't mean that there isn't any
00:02:50.879 --> 00:02:53.990
life out there. But what it will suggest
00:02:54.000 --> 00:02:56.790
to us is that life is relatively scarce.
00:02:56.800 --> 00:02:59.110
So, to me, the sooner we find life
00:02:59.120 --> 00:03:01.509
elsewhere, that a it will be awesome
00:03:01.519 --> 00:03:02.550
because, hey, look, we found life
00:03:02.560 --> 00:03:03.750
elsewhere and we've answered the
00:03:03.760 --> 00:03:06.070
ultimate question. Are we alone?
00:03:06.080 --> 00:03:07.670
But the sooner we find life elsewhere,
00:03:07.680 --> 00:03:08.949
the other thing it's telling us is that
00:03:08.959 --> 00:03:10.390
life must be fairly common in the
00:03:10.400 --> 00:03:13.110
universe. The scarcer life is, the
00:03:13.120 --> 00:03:14.710
harder it will be to find and therefore
00:03:14.720 --> 00:03:17.030
the longer it will take us to find. And
00:03:17.040 --> 00:03:19.270
now the ultimate extreme of that is that
00:03:19.280 --> 00:03:20.869
this is the only place that there is
00:03:20.879 --> 00:03:24.550
life. And it'll be very hard to conclude
00:03:24.560 --> 00:03:26.949
that even if we were talking through a
00:03:26.959 --> 00:03:29.430
time warp in 10,000 years when humanity
00:03:29.440 --> 00:03:31.110
is taking its fledgling steps into the
00:03:31.120 --> 00:03:33.990
galaxy or whatever, if we haven't found
00:03:34.000 --> 00:03:35.430
life by then, we'll be confident that
00:03:35.440 --> 00:03:37.990
life is very rare and very precious.
00:03:38.000 --> 00:03:40.149
>> That doesn't mean that there is not life
00:03:40.159 --> 00:03:41.990
somewhere else in the universe. And it's
00:03:42.000 --> 00:03:43.670
what are the challenges with this? I I
00:03:43.680 --> 00:03:44.949
would like to think that we'll find the
00:03:44.959 --> 00:03:47.030
answer to that question in our lifetime.
00:03:47.040 --> 00:03:48.550
But the only way we'll get an answer to
00:03:48.560 --> 00:03:50.550
the question, are we alone within our
00:03:50.560 --> 00:03:52.869
lifetime is if that answer is no. If
00:03:52.879 --> 00:03:54.229
that answer is that there is life
00:03:54.239 --> 00:03:57.589
elsewhere. And this is one of the big
00:03:57.599 --> 00:03:59.830
really really big open questions for
00:03:59.840 --> 00:04:01.429
humanity, open questions for science.
00:04:01.439 --> 00:04:02.630
You know, when I was a kid, when you
00:04:02.640 --> 00:04:04.869
were a kid, one of the big questions was
00:04:04.879 --> 00:04:07.190
is the solar system unique or are there
00:04:07.200 --> 00:04:08.949
planets around other stars? And we'll
00:04:08.959 --> 00:04:10.229
talk about that more in the next
00:04:10.239 --> 00:04:13.030
episode. But there is nobody under the
00:04:13.040 --> 00:04:16.150
age of 30 31 alive on this planet that
00:04:16.160 --> 00:04:17.590
grew up in that shared universe with you
00:04:17.600 --> 00:04:19.509
and I. So that fundamental question got
00:04:19.519 --> 00:04:22.310
answered and answered in abundance and
00:04:22.320 --> 00:04:23.830
answering that question is the first
00:04:23.840 --> 00:04:26.710
real step to say is there life elsewhere
00:04:26.720 --> 00:04:28.710
beyond the solar system
00:04:28.720 --> 00:04:31.189
>> because in order to find life beyond the
00:04:31.199 --> 00:04:32.710
solar system we first need to know that
00:04:32.720 --> 00:04:35.270
there's somewhere that life could exist.
00:04:35.280 --> 00:04:36.790
The question of life in the solar system
00:04:36.800 --> 00:04:38.070
is a different one and that's all part
00:04:38.080 --> 00:04:39.990
of astrobiology. So if you bundle all of
00:04:40.000 --> 00:04:42.390
this together, that question of are we
00:04:42.400 --> 00:04:44.870
alone? Is there life elsewhere? Which
00:04:44.880 --> 00:04:46.230
brings with it questions like what is
00:04:46.240 --> 00:04:48.629
the origin of life? Why are we here? How
00:04:48.639 --> 00:04:49.990
did life begin? How did it get
00:04:50.000 --> 00:04:51.510
established? What are the processes
00:04:51.520 --> 00:04:53.270
needed? Everything like that.
00:04:53.280 --> 00:04:53.749
>> Yeah.
00:04:53.759 --> 00:04:55.749
>> Is what gets bundled in in astrobiology.
00:04:55.759 --> 00:04:58.629
And astrobiology is a very very weird
00:04:58.639 --> 00:05:00.790
science. I know certainly early in my
00:05:00.800 --> 00:05:02.710
career a lot of older scientists viewed
00:05:02.720 --> 00:05:05.430
astrobiology in a similar way to the way
00:05:05.440 --> 00:05:07.110
a lot of astronomers view astrology
00:05:07.120 --> 00:05:08.469
almost. you know, they viewed it as
00:05:08.479 --> 00:05:10.870
being speculation, fiction, and hook,
00:05:10.880 --> 00:05:13.189
you know, total bogus, waste of time
00:05:13.199 --> 00:05:14.150
stuff,
00:05:14.160 --> 00:05:16.150
>> but it really isn't.
00:05:16.160 --> 00:05:18.390
>> Yeah. But one of the real challenges is
00:05:18.400 --> 00:05:20.469
uh it's not a question that one single
00:05:20.479 --> 00:05:22.150
discipline on its own can answer, right?
00:05:22.160 --> 00:05:24.550
It's not like in astronomy, you you're
00:05:24.560 --> 00:05:26.230
studying how stars form, so you talk to
00:05:26.240 --> 00:05:28.950
astronomers. In astrobiology, if we're
00:05:28.960 --> 00:05:32.469
looking at everything to do with life,
00:05:32.479 --> 00:05:34.230
astronomers like myself can't do it on
00:05:34.240 --> 00:05:36.070
their own. Biologists can't do it on
00:05:36.080 --> 00:05:38.710
their own. You need geoysicists, you
00:05:38.720 --> 00:05:41.430
need chemists, you need every area of
00:05:41.440 --> 00:05:43.270
human scientific endeavor to come
00:05:43.280 --> 00:05:45.350
together because as scientists, our
00:05:45.360 --> 00:05:47.110
knowledge is somewhat siloed. I think
00:05:47.120 --> 00:05:48.550
I've said in previous episodes, the
00:05:48.560 --> 00:05:50.070
further you go away from what your
00:05:50.080 --> 00:05:52.310
specialtity is, the more out of date and
00:05:52.320 --> 00:05:53.670
the more superficial your knowledge is.
00:05:53.680 --> 00:05:55.350
So I always view my knowledge as being
00:05:55.360 --> 00:05:57.110
almost like a Christmas tree shape. I've
00:05:57.120 --> 00:05:58.870
got a lot of knowledge about a very
00:05:58.880 --> 00:06:00.870
narrow area at the top and the further
00:06:00.880 --> 00:06:02.550
you go from that area, the less
00:06:02.560 --> 00:06:03.990
knowledge I have, but the broader my
00:06:04.000 --> 00:06:05.909
knowledge base gets. And I think every
00:06:05.919 --> 00:06:07.990
human's like that. And you can almost
00:06:08.000 --> 00:06:10.150
imagine that if you're trying to answer
00:06:10.160 --> 00:06:11.909
the question of what you need for life,
00:06:11.919 --> 00:06:13.270
where we should look, which what we'll
00:06:13.280 --> 00:06:15.909
talk about a lot today, you need a level
00:06:15.919 --> 00:06:17.510
that's above a certain point on that
00:06:17.520 --> 00:06:18.870
Christmas tree of knowledge to be able
00:06:18.880 --> 00:06:20.950
to contribute to that from a scientific
00:06:20.960 --> 00:06:23.670
advancement point of view. And the area
00:06:23.680 --> 00:06:25.510
that you can cover yourself is generally
00:06:25.520 --> 00:06:26.870
fairly small. There's a lot of knowledge
00:06:26.880 --> 00:06:28.629
that is needed that is outside your
00:06:28.639 --> 00:06:30.790
silo. And so that's where the
00:06:30.800 --> 00:06:33.029
interdicciplinary nature comes in. No
00:06:33.039 --> 00:06:35.430
one discipline can answer it their own.
00:06:35.440 --> 00:06:37.830
And that means astrobiology conferences
00:06:37.840 --> 00:06:39.990
tend to be mind-bogglingly bonkers and
00:06:40.000 --> 00:06:42.469
you get people from very different
00:06:42.479 --> 00:06:45.670
disciplines along. And you learn a lot
00:06:45.680 --> 00:06:47.430
that updates your knowledge from when
00:06:47.440 --> 00:06:48.710
you went to high school. You also learn
00:06:48.720 --> 00:06:51.510
a lot that isn't about the science but
00:06:51.520 --> 00:06:54.070
is about the scientists. And it's really
00:06:54.080 --> 00:06:55.110
interesting because we all think we're
00:06:55.120 --> 00:06:56.710
individuals. It's like that Montipython
00:06:56.720 --> 00:06:57.830
thing, isn't it? We're all individuals
00:06:57.840 --> 00:06:59.029
and there's a voice at the back that
00:06:59.039 --> 00:06:59.670
goes, "I'm not.
00:06:59.680 --> 00:07:00.790
>> I'm not."
00:07:00.800 --> 00:07:02.790
>> Yeah. It's a bit like that. We're we all
00:07:02.800 --> 00:07:04.070
think we're all individuals and we're
00:07:04.080 --> 00:07:05.830
very unique in the way we think and the
00:07:05.840 --> 00:07:07.350
way we present. But when you go to one
00:07:07.360 --> 00:07:08.710
of these conferences that's so
00:07:08.720 --> 00:07:10.390
multiddisciplinary,
00:07:10.400 --> 00:07:12.550
the different disciplines present in
00:07:12.560 --> 00:07:13.830
different ways to one another. But
00:07:13.840 --> 00:07:14.870
within the discipline, there are
00:07:14.880 --> 00:07:16.629
similarities, you know. So if you see
00:07:16.639 --> 00:07:18.230
the talks I give, I have beautiful
00:07:18.240 --> 00:07:20.550
pictures and bright text, white or
00:07:20.560 --> 00:07:22.950
yellow on them, limited text, usually a
00:07:22.960 --> 00:07:24.230
dark background. And that's really
00:07:24.240 --> 00:07:26.950
common for astronomers. You go to a talk
00:07:26.960 --> 00:07:30.070
by a kind of plate tectonics person and
00:07:30.080 --> 00:07:31.670
suddenly you've got this mish mash of
00:07:31.680 --> 00:07:34.230
colors on a totally different background
00:07:34.240 --> 00:07:36.230
where there's a bit more text but the
00:07:36.240 --> 00:07:38.390
color schemes are a bit to me kind of
00:07:38.400 --> 00:07:39.909
psychedelic and like something you'd see
00:07:39.919 --> 00:07:42.469
out of a 1970s cartoon you know
00:07:42.479 --> 00:07:43.670
>> because they're used to working with
00:07:43.680 --> 00:07:46.150
these geological maps that um have a
00:07:46.160 --> 00:07:47.510
very different color palette and
00:07:47.520 --> 00:07:49.430
sensibility I think. And then you get
00:07:49.440 --> 00:07:50.950
talks from the biologists where they've
00:07:50.960 --> 00:07:53.110
got the name of one bacterium and it
00:07:53.120 --> 00:07:54.710
fills half of the page because it's such
00:07:54.720 --> 00:07:56.469
a lengthy scientific name and they've
00:07:56.479 --> 00:07:57.909
got loads of text.
00:07:57.919 --> 00:08:00.869
>> And so you learn a lot about how what
00:08:00.879 --> 00:08:02.950
you study at university and what
00:08:02.960 --> 00:08:05.830
discipline you go into trains you to
00:08:05.840 --> 00:08:08.469
think and trains you to problem solve
00:08:08.479 --> 00:08:10.070
because it trains you in a lot of
00:08:10.080 --> 00:08:11.510
different ways. essentially programs
00:08:11.520 --> 00:08:13.749
people and you know I find that side of
00:08:13.759 --> 00:08:15.189
things really fascinating because it's a
00:08:15.199 --> 00:08:17.110
good way to learn to improve your
00:08:17.120 --> 00:08:18.869
communication skills and you also pick
00:08:18.879 --> 00:08:22.150
up all this abundance of wow I never
00:08:22.160 --> 00:08:24.150
knew that you know and that's what we
00:08:24.160 --> 00:08:26.869
need if we are to answer questions like
00:08:26.879 --> 00:08:28.790
how did life begin where did life come
00:08:28.800 --> 00:08:30.230
from are we alone
00:08:30.240 --> 00:08:32.469
>> yeah and that's really an interesting
00:08:32.479 --> 00:08:35.909
question because uh it could be life not
00:08:35.919 --> 00:08:38.070
as we know it like we you know we're
00:08:38.080 --> 00:08:39.990
assuming carbon based life forms but
00:08:40.000 --> 00:08:42.310
there could be life forms that have been
00:08:42.320 --> 00:08:43.829
created out of a completely different
00:08:43.839 --> 00:08:46.470
soup mix. Uh two things I want to get
00:08:46.480 --> 00:08:48.230
out of the way quickly. The Drake
00:08:48.240 --> 00:08:51.350
equation which uh was created to try and
00:08:51.360 --> 00:08:54.310
assess how much intelligent life that
00:08:54.320 --> 00:08:56.230
was able to communicate existed in the
00:08:56.240 --> 00:08:58.550
universe and the answer is still one.
00:08:58.560 --> 00:09:01.190
And the Fermy paradox which says you
00:09:01.200 --> 00:09:04.310
know um that statistically there's a
00:09:04.320 --> 00:09:06.150
high probability of extraterrestrial
00:09:06.160 --> 00:09:10.470
life. So where is everybody? And that's
00:09:10.480 --> 00:09:12.710
what astrobiology is really, isn't it?
00:09:12.720 --> 00:09:15.110
Where is everybody? And and will they be
00:09:15.120 --> 00:09:19.110
people or will they be microbes? And I
00:09:19.120 --> 00:09:21.829
suppose my first question to you is uh
00:09:21.839 --> 00:09:23.190
you're talking about finding life
00:09:23.200 --> 00:09:25.670
outside the solar system. Aren't we
00:09:25.680 --> 00:09:28.630
likely to find it first within the solar
00:09:28.640 --> 00:09:29.590
system?
00:09:29.600 --> 00:09:31.269
>> So that's a really good question. I was
00:09:31.279 --> 00:09:32.630
going to talk about that a bit as well
00:09:32.640 --> 00:09:35.269
because I think there are two different
00:09:35.279 --> 00:09:37.030
places in a broad sense we're looking
00:09:37.040 --> 00:09:39.750
for life elsewhere. One is
00:09:39.760 --> 00:09:41.829
in the outer solar system or on Mars,
00:09:41.839 --> 00:09:43.750
you know, in our solar system on one of
00:09:43.760 --> 00:09:45.670
the planets or on the icy objects and
00:09:45.680 --> 00:09:48.150
the other is beyond the solar system.
00:09:48.160 --> 00:09:51.269
>> And those two things have very different
00:09:51.279 --> 00:09:53.509
characteristics.
00:09:53.519 --> 00:09:56.310
What I mean by that is that objects that
00:09:56.320 --> 00:09:57.670
are in our solar system are in our
00:09:57.680 --> 00:09:59.750
backyard. They're the only things in
00:09:59.760 --> 00:10:01.590
astronomy that we can get up close and
00:10:01.600 --> 00:10:03.910
personal with. So in the solar system,
00:10:03.920 --> 00:10:06.550
the search life elsewhere is being
00:10:06.560 --> 00:10:09.269
driven by robotic exploration in the
00:10:09.279 --> 00:10:11.269
main. Yes, there's a little bit of
00:10:11.279 --> 00:10:13.910
observation from Earth. We saw that with
00:10:13.920 --> 00:10:15.670
the phosphine story on Venus that I
00:10:15.680 --> 00:10:18.069
ranted about a little bit last week. Um
00:10:18.079 --> 00:10:19.829
and the wonderful caution shown by
00:10:19.839 --> 00:10:21.190
scientists that was not necessarily
00:10:21.200 --> 00:10:23.829
reflected in the coverage. Um but a lot
00:10:23.839 --> 00:10:27.110
of the search in the solar system is
00:10:27.120 --> 00:10:29.509
robotic in nature. We send spacecraft to
00:10:29.519 --> 00:10:31.110
places to study them up close and
00:10:31.120 --> 00:10:33.350
personal and we can't do that around
00:10:33.360 --> 00:10:35.030
other stars. Around other stars, it's
00:10:35.040 --> 00:10:37.430
very much a remote sensing type deal. So
00:10:37.440 --> 00:10:38.710
there are different ways of doing it.
00:10:38.720 --> 00:10:41.350
Now I think there is a realistic chance
00:10:41.360 --> 00:10:43.509
we'll find life elsewhere in the solar
00:10:43.519 --> 00:10:45.110
system. There's a lot of good reasons
00:10:45.120 --> 00:10:47.750
for that. Now, before I dive into that a
00:10:47.760 --> 00:10:49.110
little bit, I'll just take a step back
00:10:49.120 --> 00:10:50.310
and come back to that point you made
00:10:50.320 --> 00:10:52.069
about life like us and carbon based life
00:10:52.079 --> 00:10:54.069
versus other things because it's really
00:10:54.079 --> 00:10:55.990
important to make explicit what is
00:10:56.000 --> 00:10:59.030
normally an implicit bias when
00:10:59.040 --> 00:11:00.069
scientists are talking about
00:11:00.079 --> 00:11:01.590
astrobiology.
00:11:01.600 --> 00:11:03.110
Um, it's really made clear when you
00:11:03.120 --> 00:11:05.990
think about NASA and efforts on the moon
00:11:06.000 --> 00:11:08.069
where they have on on Mars, sorry, where
00:11:08.079 --> 00:11:09.910
they have aggressively said the strategy
00:11:09.920 --> 00:11:12.470
to look for life is to follow the water.
00:11:12.480 --> 00:11:13.350
M
00:11:13.360 --> 00:11:16.470
>> what they're doing there is making an
00:11:16.480 --> 00:11:17.990
implicit assumption that is an
00:11:18.000 --> 00:11:19.829
assumption that is not always written
00:11:19.839 --> 00:11:21.350
out and is clear but is at the back of
00:11:21.360 --> 00:11:24.949
it that life that we look for will be
00:11:24.959 --> 00:11:26.870
life like us and I mean life like earth
00:11:26.880 --> 00:11:29.509
life now we can imagine you see it on
00:11:29.519 --> 00:11:31.030
science fiction all the time you know
00:11:31.040 --> 00:11:32.870
life that is very other it might be
00:11:32.880 --> 00:11:34.870
molten metal monsters on a magma planet
00:11:34.880 --> 00:11:36.790
or it might be an intelligent hydrogen
00:11:36.800 --> 00:11:38.230
cloud that nevertheless wants to flirt
00:11:38.240 --> 00:11:41.509
with Captain Kirk it's very different
00:11:41.519 --> 00:11:43.910
kinds of life. But fundamentally, we
00:11:43.920 --> 00:11:46.550
only know of one type of life that does
00:11:46.560 --> 00:11:49.750
exist and that's life like earth life.
00:11:49.760 --> 00:11:52.949
And so when we look for life elsewhere,
00:11:52.959 --> 00:11:55.110
at least in what is the early stages
00:11:55.120 --> 00:11:57.269
still, it is really important to look
00:11:57.279 --> 00:11:59.110
for something that we know can exist and
00:11:59.120 --> 00:12:01.590
does exist rather than looking for
00:12:01.600 --> 00:12:03.269
things that we could speculate might
00:12:03.279 --> 00:12:05.110
exist. If you've got to focus your
00:12:05.120 --> 00:12:08.230
efforts with limited resources, it makes
00:12:08.240 --> 00:12:10.949
sense to follow the kind of welltrodden
00:12:10.959 --> 00:12:12.629
footsteps of what we know about life on
00:12:12.639 --> 00:12:14.629
Earth. And from an astronomer's point of
00:12:14.639 --> 00:12:16.949
view, life on Earth needs three things.
00:12:16.959 --> 00:12:18.870
You know, it needs liquid water, it
00:12:18.880 --> 00:12:20.470
needs a source of energy and a source of
00:12:20.480 --> 00:12:22.069
nutrients. And quite often those two are
00:12:22.079 --> 00:12:24.470
the same thing, but not always. And
00:12:24.480 --> 00:12:26.310
wherever we find those things on Earth,
00:12:26.320 --> 00:12:28.150
we find life in abundance. And once life
00:12:28.160 --> 00:12:29.590
gets there, it's really hard to get rid
00:12:29.600 --> 00:12:31.509
of. You know, anybody who's had ants
00:12:31.519 --> 00:12:33.509
getting into their kitchen or the mice
00:12:33.519 --> 00:12:35.509
plague that we talked about last week
00:12:35.519 --> 00:12:38.310
knows just how life once it gets
00:12:38.320 --> 00:12:41.590
established keeps going. And so it makes
00:12:41.600 --> 00:12:43.670
sense. And a lot of what I'll talk about
00:12:43.680 --> 00:12:45.430
for all the rest of the episode is kind
00:12:45.440 --> 00:12:47.509
of based on this assumption that we're
00:12:47.519 --> 00:12:49.990
looking at at least initially for life
00:12:50.000 --> 00:12:52.069
like us that has the same needs as us
00:12:52.079 --> 00:12:54.230
where the us is the broad the entire
00:12:54.240 --> 00:12:56.790
panel play of life on Earth rather than
00:12:56.800 --> 00:12:58.710
us as in me and the having this chat
00:12:58.720 --> 00:13:01.829
back and forward. What that leads to
00:13:01.839 --> 00:13:03.110
though is a lot of studies that have
00:13:03.120 --> 00:13:04.550
been done for the solar system are very
00:13:04.560 --> 00:13:07.430
waterdriven. And if you go back decades,
00:13:07.440 --> 00:13:09.990
you could go back to the late 1800s when
00:13:10.000 --> 00:13:11.829
people were obsessed with this idea that
00:13:11.839 --> 00:13:13.350
there was an advanced technological
00:13:13.360 --> 00:13:15.829
civilization on Mars that was running
00:13:15.839 --> 00:13:17.190
out of time because the planet was
00:13:17.200 --> 00:13:19.269
desolate and barren. And this was all
00:13:19.279 --> 00:13:21.190
motivated by the observations of the
00:13:21.200 --> 00:13:23.990
canali, the channels on Mars that don't
00:13:24.000 --> 00:13:26.150
exist, which were mistransated as
00:13:26.160 --> 00:13:27.990
canals. And canals on Earth are a very
00:13:28.000 --> 00:13:30.230
clear sign of human activity.
00:13:30.240 --> 00:13:32.870
>> Yeah. People at that time were so
00:13:32.880 --> 00:13:34.389
certain that we'd already found life
00:13:34.399 --> 00:13:37.190
that when there was a prize awarded um a
00:13:37.200 --> 00:13:39.590
prize laid out sorry and announced I
00:13:39.600 --> 00:13:41.750
think it was like in 1899 or something
00:13:41.760 --> 00:13:43.350
for the search for life for the first
00:13:43.360 --> 00:13:45.190
person to discover life elsewhere to
00:13:45.200 --> 00:13:47.269
find evidence of life elsewhere. That
00:13:47.279 --> 00:13:50.230
prize explicitly excluded Mars because
00:13:50.240 --> 00:13:51.910
it was felt that life on Mars was so
00:13:51.920 --> 00:13:53.269
well established that that was a
00:13:53.279 --> 00:13:55.110
no-brainer. You know, it was such a
00:13:55.120 --> 00:13:56.389
thing in popular culture that when the
00:13:56.399 --> 00:13:58.069
War of the Worlds broadcast happened in
00:13:58.079 --> 00:14:00.629
the 1930s, people thought it was live
00:14:00.639 --> 00:14:02.150
news coverage and panicked.
00:14:02.160 --> 00:14:02.949
>> Yes. You know,
00:14:02.959 --> 00:14:05.030
>> the night that panicked America.
00:14:05.040 --> 00:14:08.470
>> Yeah. And there's this whole heritage of
00:14:08.480 --> 00:14:11.750
our expectation of life being common and
00:14:11.760 --> 00:14:14.710
it being life like us requiring water.
00:14:14.720 --> 00:14:16.949
When we went to Mars, like in the 1960s
00:14:16.959 --> 00:14:19.750
with spacecraft, Mars was shown to be
00:14:19.760 --> 00:14:21.269
the desolate arid world we knew today.
00:14:21.279 --> 00:14:23.189
That put to an end the thoughts of an
00:14:23.199 --> 00:14:25.910
advanced civilization there. And from
00:14:25.920 --> 00:14:27.750
that time onwards there was a period
00:14:27.760 --> 00:14:29.829
where arguments in astrobiology fell
00:14:29.839 --> 00:14:31.189
very much out of favor, out of fashion.
00:14:31.199 --> 00:14:32.389
And it was kind of viewed much more
00:14:32.399 --> 00:14:34.310
likely that life was almost unique. We
00:14:34.320 --> 00:14:36.470
were alone. There was no way you could
00:14:36.480 --> 00:14:38.310
look. And there's this argument that I
00:14:38.320 --> 00:14:41.910
often hear as that water is scarce in
00:14:41.920 --> 00:14:44.230
the universe. And that makes my head
00:14:44.240 --> 00:14:45.910
hurt. I think this is one of those big
00:14:45.920 --> 00:14:49.189
myths that is a myth of miscommunication
00:14:49.199 --> 00:14:51.590
or a myth of
00:14:51.600 --> 00:14:55.110
language being a personal thing. What I
00:14:55.120 --> 00:14:57.590
mean by that is and I I'm always try to
00:14:57.600 --> 00:14:59.509
be very aware of this when I'm as a
00:14:59.519 --> 00:15:02.790
communicator that words have different
00:15:02.800 --> 00:15:05.350
meanings to different people. And so the
00:15:05.360 --> 00:15:07.990
same word that I say you'll hear and it
00:15:08.000 --> 00:15:09.269
doesn't always mean the same thing to
00:15:09.279 --> 00:15:10.949
you or me. One of one of the best
00:15:10.959 --> 00:15:13.670
examples of this is when you get people
00:15:13.680 --> 00:15:15.990
who are trying to argue against an area
00:15:16.000 --> 00:15:17.670
of science, maybe vaccines, maybe
00:15:17.680 --> 00:15:19.189
climate change, maybe something less
00:15:19.199 --> 00:15:21.189
controversial. You'll often hear people
00:15:21.199 --> 00:15:23.350
say that, well, climate change is just a
00:15:23.360 --> 00:15:25.590
theory, or vaccines are just a theory,
00:15:25.600 --> 00:15:27.910
or the Big Bang is just a theory. And to
00:15:27.920 --> 00:15:31.189
a lot of people, a theory just means a
00:15:31.199 --> 00:15:34.790
loose idea. A lot of people will say,
00:15:34.800 --> 00:15:36.230
"Why isn't your car starting this
00:15:36.240 --> 00:15:38.550
morning?" Well, I've got a theory. To a
00:15:38.560 --> 00:15:40.470
scientist, a theory is a very different
00:15:40.480 --> 00:15:42.389
beast and it's tied to the ability to
00:15:42.399 --> 00:15:45.430
make testable predictions and repeated
00:15:45.440 --> 00:15:47.910
testing. There's a lot of philosophy of
00:15:47.920 --> 00:15:49.990
science. I did a philosophy of physics
00:15:50.000 --> 00:15:51.749
course at university when I was 18 and I
00:15:51.759 --> 00:15:52.949
wish I'd done it when I was at the end
00:15:52.959 --> 00:15:54.389
of my degree, not the start cuz I'd have
00:15:54.399 --> 00:15:56.389
got a lot more out of it. But there are
00:15:56.399 --> 00:15:58.230
people who have aggressively studied the
00:15:58.240 --> 00:16:01.269
philosophy of the scientific method. And
00:16:01.279 --> 00:16:03.030
even that philosophy varies a little bit
00:16:03.040 --> 00:16:05.189
discipline to discipline. A lot of other
00:16:05.199 --> 00:16:06.470
disciplines that are the experimental
00:16:06.480 --> 00:16:08.870
ones are are very much more hypothesis
00:16:08.880 --> 00:16:11.350
driven than astronomy where we say I'm
00:16:11.360 --> 00:16:12.710
interested in what this is. Let's have a
00:16:12.720 --> 00:16:14.310
look. There's not really a hypothesis. I
00:16:14.320 --> 00:16:15.749
just want to look at it and find out. At
00:16:15.759 --> 00:16:18.310
least that's how I work. But you also
00:16:18.320 --> 00:16:20.470
have this thing where at least from my
00:16:20.480 --> 00:16:21.990
philosophy, you can never prove a
00:16:22.000 --> 00:16:24.230
theory, but you can disprove a theory.
00:16:24.240 --> 00:16:26.470
What I mean by that is if you test a
00:16:26.480 --> 00:16:29.030
theory a million times and each time
00:16:29.040 --> 00:16:31.189
it's backed it up, you haven't proven
00:16:31.199 --> 00:16:32.949
that theory. You've just shown that
00:16:32.959 --> 00:16:34.550
theory is a very good approximation to
00:16:34.560 --> 00:16:36.310
what's actually happening. So take the
00:16:36.320 --> 00:16:38.470
example of me flipping a coin. I can
00:16:38.480 --> 00:16:40.470
have a theory that says coins will
00:16:40.480 --> 00:16:43.590
always land heads or tails. Test that a
00:16:43.600 --> 00:16:44.949
million times and odds are a million
00:16:44.959 --> 00:16:46.790
times you'll land heads or tails. But
00:16:46.800 --> 00:16:48.230
you've not proven that theory. You've
00:16:48.240 --> 00:16:49.269
just said it's a very close
00:16:49.279 --> 00:16:51.430
approximation to the truth. You could
00:16:51.440 --> 00:16:52.870
toss them 10 million times and one time
00:16:52.880 --> 00:16:54.069
your coin lands on its edge and
00:16:54.079 --> 00:16:54.870
balances.
00:16:54.880 --> 00:16:55.189
>> Yeah.
00:16:55.199 --> 00:16:56.710
>> That one observation. And so as long as
00:16:56.720 --> 00:16:58.230
it's well documented and is repeatable
00:16:58.240 --> 00:17:00.230
is enough to kill that theory and then
00:17:00.240 --> 00:17:01.910
you need to develop something more
00:17:01.920 --> 00:17:03.670
complex. You know
00:17:03.680 --> 00:17:05.590
>> that's where it goes from. Now that's a
00:17:05.600 --> 00:17:07.669
very roundabout way of coming back at
00:17:07.679 --> 00:17:11.829
this water being scarce myth. I think
00:17:11.839 --> 00:17:13.829
where that comes from is when you talk
00:17:13.839 --> 00:17:17.829
to me about water I am just thinking
00:17:17.839 --> 00:17:19.750
about the molecule. I'm not thinking
00:17:19.760 --> 00:17:22.630
about the physical state. So to me water
00:17:22.640 --> 00:17:24.309
can be water ice. It can be liquid
00:17:24.319 --> 00:17:26.549
water. It can be water vapor. But to
00:17:26.559 --> 00:17:28.309
most people, if you say water, they
00:17:28.319 --> 00:17:30.150
visualize liquid water. Yeah.
00:17:30.160 --> 00:17:31.750
>> Right. If if I say, "Would you like some
00:17:31.760 --> 00:17:33.029
water?" You're not expecting me to
00:17:33.039 --> 00:17:35.029
immediately start steing your face.
00:17:35.039 --> 00:17:36.549
You're expecting a glass of water.
00:17:36.559 --> 00:17:38.470
Right?
00:17:38.480 --> 00:17:40.150
What that means is that when people look
00:17:40.160 --> 00:17:41.510
out at the solar system and look
00:17:41.520 --> 00:17:43.270
everywhere else, we see this thing that
00:17:43.280 --> 00:17:45.190
Earth is the only place where we have
00:17:45.200 --> 00:17:47.669
abundant liquid water all the time on
00:17:47.679 --> 00:17:50.310
the surface. And so people have this
00:17:50.320 --> 00:17:51.830
idea that water is scarce where what
00:17:51.840 --> 00:17:54.470
they're really thinking is liquid water
00:17:54.480 --> 00:17:58.230
on the surface of an object is scarce.
00:17:58.240 --> 00:18:00.470
>> But that drove a lot of this idea that
00:18:00.480 --> 00:18:02.070
life will be scarce because life needs
00:18:02.080 --> 00:18:04.070
liquid water on Earth. The Earth's the
00:18:04.080 --> 00:18:06.230
only place with liquid water. Ergo life
00:18:06.240 --> 00:18:09.270
will be scarce. That's moved on though
00:18:09.280 --> 00:18:10.870
in about the last three or four decades.
00:18:10.880 --> 00:18:12.950
partially with the exploration of Mars
00:18:12.960 --> 00:18:15.750
where we're getting an overwhelmingly
00:18:15.760 --> 00:18:17.350
greater amount of evidence that Mars in
00:18:17.360 --> 00:18:19.110
the past was warm and wet, that it had
00:18:19.120 --> 00:18:20.470
oceans and lakes. They may have been
00:18:20.480 --> 00:18:22.310
slushy or they may have been properly
00:18:22.320 --> 00:18:24.230
liquid, but it had oceans and lakes for
00:18:24.240 --> 00:18:26.470
a long time of liquid water. And we've
00:18:26.480 --> 00:18:27.510
even got evidence that there is
00:18:27.520 --> 00:18:29.350
permanent liquid water on Mars as we're
00:18:29.360 --> 00:18:30.710
talking now in the form of liquid water
00:18:30.720 --> 00:18:33.029
in the Martian polar ice caps and you
00:18:33.039 --> 00:18:34.630
get temporal liquid water running on the
00:18:34.640 --> 00:18:36.710
surface. The other thing we found in the
00:18:36.720 --> 00:18:39.590
solar system is liquid water in
00:18:39.600 --> 00:18:41.510
astonishing abundance in the outer solar
00:18:41.520 --> 00:18:44.710
system protected by shells of ice on the
00:18:44.720 --> 00:18:47.029
icy satellites of the giant planets on
00:18:47.039 --> 00:18:48.630
the dwarf planet Pluto or inside the
00:18:48.640 --> 00:18:50.870
dwarf planet Pluto probably in the
00:18:50.880 --> 00:18:53.909
larger edge kipeld objects transepun
00:18:53.919 --> 00:18:56.230
objects maybe in other places as well
00:18:56.240 --> 00:18:58.950
even in places as small as Enceladus so
00:18:58.960 --> 00:19:01.029
there's been this revolution from the
00:19:01.039 --> 00:19:02.230
point of view of the solar system
00:19:02.240 --> 00:19:04.789
through my lifetime that actually liquid
00:19:04.799 --> 00:19:06.710
water isn't scarce.
00:19:06.720 --> 00:19:08.070
>> Coupled to the fact that the earth is
00:19:08.080 --> 00:19:10.310
actually remarkably dry as a planet that
00:19:10.320 --> 00:19:11.990
suddenly opened up people's perspectives
00:19:12.000 --> 00:19:13.750
again that the solar system is a good
00:19:13.760 --> 00:19:15.430
place to look for life and that's
00:19:15.440 --> 00:19:17.270
driving a lot of exploration missions
00:19:17.280 --> 00:19:19.990
all the Mars exploration past and future
00:19:20.000 --> 00:19:22.070
focused around that idea. the fact that
00:19:22.080 --> 00:19:23.350
we've got two missions going to the
00:19:23.360 --> 00:19:25.110
Jovian ICE satellites at the minute
00:19:25.120 --> 00:19:27.669
juice um the Jupyter moons explorer and
00:19:27.679 --> 00:19:29.510
the Europa Clipper which are to
00:19:29.520 --> 00:19:31.430
characterize those moons better to
00:19:31.440 --> 00:19:33.270
prepare for potential future landings in
00:19:33.280 --> 00:19:35.669
the 2040s or 50s to get through the ice
00:19:35.679 --> 00:19:37.669
and look at what's underneath. We've got
00:19:37.679 --> 00:19:39.350
the Dragonfly mission going out to
00:19:39.360 --> 00:19:41.270
Titan, launching in a couple of years
00:19:41.280 --> 00:19:43.190
time, probably next year. Hoping to get
00:19:43.200 --> 00:19:46.070
there 2034 that will land on the only
00:19:46.080 --> 00:19:47.669
other place that has liquid on its
00:19:47.679 --> 00:19:50.150
surface exposed to the atmosphere in the
00:19:50.160 --> 00:19:51.750
solar system and that's Titan with lakes
00:19:51.760 --> 00:19:53.990
of liquid methane and ethane. The water
00:19:54.000 --> 00:19:55.510
there is harder than granite and makes
00:19:55.520 --> 00:19:57.669
up the mountains. But there's this huge
00:19:57.679 --> 00:19:59.190
effort to explore our solar system and
00:19:59.200 --> 00:20:01.270
actually go there and look, which we
00:20:01.280 --> 00:20:03.110
can't do when we're looking at planets
00:20:03.120 --> 00:20:05.750
around the stars. And by going there and
00:20:05.760 --> 00:20:08.310
looking if there is anything there past
00:20:08.320 --> 00:20:10.630
or present eventually we'll find it.
00:20:10.640 --> 00:20:13.029
>> Now that immediately then poses a really
00:20:13.039 --> 00:20:14.950
fascinating one. So if we find life on
00:20:14.960 --> 00:20:18.150
Mars or we find life on Europa
00:20:18.160 --> 00:20:21.430
if we can look at that life and figure
00:20:21.440 --> 00:20:24.789
out its heritage figure out its DNA and
00:20:24.799 --> 00:20:26.710
I'm not a biologist so I'll be a little
00:20:26.720 --> 00:20:29.350
woolly on that. It will be very quick
00:20:29.360 --> 00:20:31.110
and very apparent whether that life has
00:20:31.120 --> 00:20:32.870
a shared origin to life on earth or
00:20:32.880 --> 00:20:34.710
whether it has a separate origin to life
00:20:34.720 --> 00:20:36.950
on earth. Now the separate origin would
00:20:36.960 --> 00:20:38.630
mean that life got started
00:20:38.640 --> 00:20:40.149
simultaneously
00:20:40.159 --> 00:20:42.310
on two objects in the same planetary
00:20:42.320 --> 00:20:45.510
system in an icy backwater of a fairly
00:20:45.520 --> 00:20:48.230
unremarkable galaxy. If it got started
00:20:48.240 --> 00:20:49.909
two places side by side, surely that
00:20:49.919 --> 00:20:51.990
means life gets started more easily than
00:20:52.000 --> 00:20:54.390
we expect. Therefore, life should be
00:20:54.400 --> 00:20:56.630
common in the universe. That would be an
00:20:56.640 --> 00:20:59.190
obvious logical continuation. The other
00:20:59.200 --> 00:21:00.870
option is that we find life elsewhere in
00:21:00.880 --> 00:21:02.230
the solar system and it has a shared
00:21:02.240 --> 00:21:03.990
heritage life on Earth. What that means
00:21:04.000 --> 00:21:06.390
is that we analyze its makeup, we find
00:21:06.400 --> 00:21:09.270
that it has DNA like Earth DNA that has
00:21:09.280 --> 00:21:11.669
a shared universal common ancestor. And
00:21:11.679 --> 00:21:13.270
what that suggests is that once life
00:21:13.280 --> 00:21:14.950
gets started somewhere, it's
00:21:14.960 --> 00:21:16.630
transmissible. You know, you've got that
00:21:16.640 --> 00:21:18.070
old thing of don't go near Earth. It's
00:21:18.080 --> 00:21:20.390
got humans. They're contagious.
00:21:20.400 --> 00:21:22.630
This is the same kind of idea. If we
00:21:22.640 --> 00:21:24.310
find life on Mars and that life has a
00:21:24.320 --> 00:21:27.270
shared heritage with life on Earth, that
00:21:27.280 --> 00:21:29.750
validates strongly supports the idea of
00:21:29.760 --> 00:21:31.990
panspermia, which I've had a student
00:21:32.000 --> 00:21:35.029
just submit his PhD thesis studying. The
00:21:35.039 --> 00:21:36.710
idea that life can transfer between the
00:21:36.720 --> 00:21:39.430
planets. Now again, if life can transfer
00:21:39.440 --> 00:21:40.870
easily enough to be found in multiple
00:21:40.880 --> 00:21:42.390
locations in the solar system from a
00:21:42.400 --> 00:21:45.430
simple single origin and maybe even
00:21:45.440 --> 00:21:46.950
Earth wasn't that origin, you know,
00:21:46.960 --> 00:21:48.310
maybe we're Martians, maybe we're
00:21:48.320 --> 00:21:51.029
Venucians or Venerians. I think that
00:21:51.039 --> 00:21:52.950
Venerian used to be the adjective for
00:21:52.960 --> 00:21:54.630
Ven adjective the right word used to be
00:21:54.640 --> 00:21:55.830
the word for Venus in the way that
00:21:55.840 --> 00:21:57.750
Martian was for Mars but it was a bit
00:21:57.760 --> 00:22:01.190
too close to venerial um because
00:22:01.200 --> 00:22:03.430
>> so they changed it but anyway um but we
00:22:03.440 --> 00:22:05.909
could be venerial creatures um we don't
00:22:05.919 --> 00:22:07.590
know but what that suggests is that if
00:22:07.600 --> 00:22:09.590
life is transferred easily and
00:22:09.600 --> 00:22:11.830
effectively once it originates life
00:22:11.840 --> 00:22:14.230
could be common in the universe so to me
00:22:14.240 --> 00:22:15.909
finding life in the solar system would
00:22:15.919 --> 00:22:17.270
be awesome I think it's eminently
00:22:17.280 --> 00:22:19.990
feasible and either way it will shed new
00:22:20.000 --> 00:22:22.310
on the commonality of life beyond the
00:22:22.320 --> 00:22:24.630
solar system. We will be looking for
00:22:24.640 --> 00:22:27.190
life like us. It is possible to imagine
00:22:27.200 --> 00:22:28.630
life that is not like us that has
00:22:28.640 --> 00:22:29.909
different requirements but that will
00:22:29.919 --> 00:22:32.630
probably be a bit harder to find and we
00:22:32.640 --> 00:22:35.190
don't know what it would be. Whereas
00:22:35.200 --> 00:22:36.950
with life like us, we know things to
00:22:36.960 --> 00:22:38.870
look for. So that makes it a bit easier
00:22:38.880 --> 00:22:41.430
for us to look for life like us. It also
00:22:41.440 --> 00:22:44.630
makes it, I'd say, a little bit stronger
00:22:44.640 --> 00:22:46.950
as a case when you're asking for funding
00:22:46.960 --> 00:22:48.230
because you can say, well, we already
00:22:48.240 --> 00:22:50.390
know this kind of life can exist. So,
00:22:50.400 --> 00:22:51.750
we're going to look at a place where the
00:22:51.760 --> 00:22:52.950
conditions are similar to where we know
00:22:52.960 --> 00:22:54.870
it does exist and see if we find it
00:22:54.880 --> 00:22:56.070
there as well.
00:22:56.080 --> 00:22:58.710
>> Okay, let's take a short break. Uh, this
00:22:58.720 --> 00:23:01.110
is Space Nuts with Andrew Dunley and
00:23:01.120 --> 00:23:04.630
Professor Jonty Horner.
00:23:04.640 --> 00:23:06.230
Let's take a short break from the show
00:23:06.240 --> 00:23:09.590
to tell you about our sponsor, NordVPN.
00:23:09.600 --> 00:23:11.190
Uh let's talk about your online
00:23:11.200 --> 00:23:14.149
security. Now I I I can tell you from
00:23:14.159 --> 00:23:16.390
personal experience uh last year when
00:23:16.400 --> 00:23:19.350
Judy and I were overseas, we ran into uh
00:23:19.360 --> 00:23:21.750
a bit of a frustrating issue. There were
00:23:21.760 --> 00:23:23.990
certain apps we simply couldn't use
00:23:24.000 --> 00:23:26.070
without a VPN connection. Things like
00:23:26.080 --> 00:23:29.510
our banking apps uh they wouldn't load.
00:23:29.520 --> 00:23:32.470
Uh and even a sports app I rely on uh
00:23:32.480 --> 00:23:34.470
wouldn't let me watch games back home
00:23:34.480 --> 00:23:36.630
because of geo fencing and things like
00:23:36.640 --> 00:23:40.149
that. Uh so um with NordVPN I was able
00:23:40.159 --> 00:23:43.430
to watch uh football back home while
00:23:43.440 --> 00:23:45.190
crossing the Atlantic Ocean. It was
00:23:45.200 --> 00:23:48.470
pretty weird but uh it worked. Uh and
00:23:48.480 --> 00:23:51.669
NordVPN is the best in the business. Uh
00:23:51.679 --> 00:23:54.070
with NordVPN you can securely connect to
00:23:54.080 --> 00:23:55.909
servers all around the world which means
00:23:55.919 --> 00:23:58.390
your apps think you're right back home
00:23:58.400 --> 00:24:00.789
even when you're not. Uh, it's all it
00:24:00.799 --> 00:24:02.549
also encrypts your internet traffic,
00:24:02.559 --> 00:24:04.310
hides your IP address, and keeps your
00:24:04.320 --> 00:24:06.070
personal data safe from hackers and
00:24:06.080 --> 00:24:08.549
trackers and anybody else who's trying
00:24:08.559 --> 00:24:11.590
to get at you online. And this can
00:24:11.600 --> 00:24:14.710
happen in public Wi-Fi situations in
00:24:14.720 --> 00:24:17.350
hotels, airports, cafes, anywhere like
00:24:17.360 --> 00:24:20.310
that. The best part, it's fast.
00:24:20.320 --> 00:24:22.310
Thousands of servers globally, and their
00:24:22.320 --> 00:24:25.190
Nord links technology uh allows you to
00:24:25.200 --> 00:24:28.390
run seamlessly, no slowing down. It is
00:24:28.400 --> 00:24:30.470
brilliant. Right now, you can grab the
00:24:30.480 --> 00:24:33.669
special Spacets deal through this URL,
00:24:33.679 --> 00:24:36.870
nordvpn.com/spacenuts.
00:24:36.880 --> 00:24:38.549
You'll get four extra months free, plus
00:24:38.559 --> 00:24:40.870
a 30-day money back guarantee. So,
00:24:40.880 --> 00:24:43.110
there's absolutely no risk if you want
00:24:43.120 --> 00:24:44.470
to give it a go. That's
00:24:44.480 --> 00:24:48.630
nordvpn.com/spacenuts.
00:24:48.640 --> 00:24:51.190
Stay safe online with our sponsor,
00:24:51.200 --> 00:24:53.430
NordVPN.
00:24:53.440 --> 00:24:57.269
>> I'm going to step off the mount.
00:24:57.279 --> 00:25:02.630
That's one small step for man,
00:25:02.640 --> 00:25:05.590
one leap for mankind.
00:25:05.600 --> 00:25:07.510
>> Space nuts.
00:25:07.520 --> 00:25:09.269
>> It's not Professor Fred Watson at the
00:25:09.279 --> 00:25:10.870
moment. He's away. We've got Professor
00:25:10.880 --> 00:25:12.230
Jonty Hoer and we're talking
00:25:12.240 --> 00:25:15.110
astrobiology in this uh little special
00:25:15.120 --> 00:25:18.230
edition. Um, one thing I heard in the
00:25:18.240 --> 00:25:19.990
news recently, I think Fred and I talked
00:25:20.000 --> 00:25:21.909
about it was uh, you know, we've been
00:25:21.919 --> 00:25:23.669
talking about water and if you want to
00:25:23.679 --> 00:25:25.750
find the people, find the water, that
00:25:25.760 --> 00:25:27.430
sort of thing. But there was one
00:25:27.440 --> 00:25:29.990
particular study that uh was recently
00:25:30.000 --> 00:25:31.430
released that says if you want to find
00:25:31.440 --> 00:25:34.070
the people, find the coal. What do you
00:25:34.080 --> 00:25:35.430
think of that theory?
00:25:35.440 --> 00:25:37.190
>> That's an interesting one. So that's the
00:25:37.200 --> 00:25:39.269
idea that if you want to find somebody
00:25:39.279 --> 00:25:40.710
to talk to,
00:25:40.720 --> 00:25:42.230
>> there needs to be something to fuel an
00:25:42.240 --> 00:25:44.149
industrial revolution. And again, this
00:25:44.159 --> 00:25:45.029
is
00:25:45.039 --> 00:25:46.870
>> I think science fiction sometimes does
00:25:46.880 --> 00:25:48.710
this really ask this really interesting
00:25:48.720 --> 00:25:50.390
questions of
00:25:50.400 --> 00:25:53.990
>> almost is the path that we have followed
00:25:54.000 --> 00:25:55.669
the one that everyone will follow? you
00:25:55.679 --> 00:25:57.750
know because there's so much to some
00:25:57.760 --> 00:25:59.909
degree randomness in the things that
00:25:59.919 --> 00:26:02.470
have driven our knowledge and our
00:26:02.480 --> 00:26:04.470
development of things you know um
00:26:04.480 --> 00:26:06.470
obviously a good example is a famous
00:26:06.480 --> 00:26:08.870
myth about penicellin that if um you
00:26:08.880 --> 00:26:10.549
leave your bread out and it goes moldy
00:26:10.559 --> 00:26:13.190
that makes your pus more effective um
00:26:13.200 --> 00:26:15.830
and that was an incredible scientific
00:26:15.840 --> 00:26:17.590
re revolution driven by that discovery
00:26:17.600 --> 00:26:19.510
there
00:26:19.520 --> 00:26:21.430
who's to say other civilizations would
00:26:21.440 --> 00:26:22.870
have the same discoveries in the same
00:26:22.880 --> 00:26:26.710
order now to advance. We have required
00:26:26.720 --> 00:26:29.830
advances in energy in order to allow us
00:26:29.840 --> 00:26:32.710
to better develop technology and develop
00:26:32.720 --> 00:26:34.310
the things that everything's made of.
00:26:34.320 --> 00:26:36.070
You know, if we didn't have anything
00:26:36.080 --> 00:26:38.789
that you could burn, it would be very
00:26:38.799 --> 00:26:40.710
very challenging to smelt metal. If you
00:26:40.720 --> 00:26:42.390
couldn't smelt metal, how do you build
00:26:42.400 --> 00:26:43.430
electronics?
00:26:43.440 --> 00:26:45.350
>> You are spot on. That's exactly what the
00:26:45.360 --> 00:26:48.470
article was all about. And uh the bottom
00:26:48.480 --> 00:26:51.269
line was uh that because of the timing
00:26:51.279 --> 00:26:55.430
required, it lessens the likelihood of
00:26:55.440 --> 00:26:59.269
us finding uh people like us. It reduces
00:26:59.279 --> 00:27:00.149
the odds.
00:27:00.159 --> 00:27:02.230
>> And this is where there's a difference
00:27:02.240 --> 00:27:04.149
between the search for extraterrestrial
00:27:04.159 --> 00:27:06.230
intelligence and the search for life. So
00:27:06.240 --> 00:27:07.669
the search for extraterrestrial
00:27:07.679 --> 00:27:09.430
intelligence is like a subset of the
00:27:09.440 --> 00:27:12.070
search for life. Search for life is a
00:27:12.080 --> 00:27:14.149
search for bacteria as much as it's the
00:27:14.159 --> 00:27:17.430
search for communicative aliens. And
00:27:17.440 --> 00:27:19.190
there's been a lot of stuff written and
00:27:19.200 --> 00:27:22.149
discussed about whether evolutionary
00:27:22.159 --> 00:27:24.230
quirks have benefited us by being here,
00:27:24.240 --> 00:27:26.070
you know, in terms of we're a social
00:27:26.080 --> 00:27:27.590
communal animal that shares resources
00:27:27.600 --> 00:27:30.149
and shares learning. There have been
00:27:30.159 --> 00:27:31.669
other ones like that from Aunt Collins.
00:27:31.679 --> 00:27:34.310
And I'm listening to a very chill and
00:27:34.320 --> 00:27:38.230
very silly um lit RPG. I think would be
00:27:38.240 --> 00:27:39.830
the description of the genre book called
00:27:39.840 --> 00:27:41.350
series of books called Chrysis at the
00:27:41.360 --> 00:27:44.230
minute where a young boy who dies for
00:27:44.240 --> 00:27:47.269
reasons is reincarnated in the b body of
00:27:47.279 --> 00:27:50.230
an ant. And it's a book about him as an
00:27:50.240 --> 00:27:52.070
ant and his life in the colony and stuff
00:27:52.080 --> 00:27:55.350
and it's bonkers but um you've got an
00:27:55.360 --> 00:27:57.590
advanced social species there and he
00:27:57.600 --> 00:27:59.190
finds ways without too many spoilers of
00:27:59.200 --> 00:28:00.389
giving them intelligence and what
00:28:00.399 --> 00:28:01.909
happens afterwards.
00:28:01.919 --> 00:28:03.430
>> There's a few species in the history of
00:28:03.440 --> 00:28:05.350
earth that have that kind of communal
00:28:05.360 --> 00:28:07.750
sharing of information thing. we're the
00:28:07.760 --> 00:28:09.029
only ones that have achieved what we've
00:28:09.039 --> 00:28:11.669
achieved. Some arguments are that's down
00:28:11.679 --> 00:28:13.909
to the development of language and our
00:28:13.919 --> 00:28:16.070
ability to produce complex language and
00:28:16.080 --> 00:28:17.669
also the opposable thumb being quite
00:28:17.679 --> 00:28:20.149
important. So there's a lot of stuff
00:28:20.159 --> 00:28:22.630
that there are many steps between the
00:28:22.640 --> 00:28:24.230
development of life and the development
00:28:24.240 --> 00:28:26.630
of intelligence and the development of
00:28:26.640 --> 00:28:28.389
intelligence itself doesn't necessarily
00:28:28.399 --> 00:28:29.990
mean the development of technological
00:28:30.000 --> 00:28:31.750
intelligence. You know, a lot of
00:28:31.760 --> 00:28:33.590
discussions about all the things octopi
00:28:33.600 --> 00:28:36.710
or octopods or octopidles octopi could
00:28:36.720 --> 00:28:38.950
achieve if they lived for more than 3
00:28:38.960 --> 00:28:41.029
years and if they were a social animal.
00:28:41.039 --> 00:28:42.389
They've got incredible brains. We're
00:28:42.399 --> 00:28:44.230
learning more and more about some of the
00:28:44.240 --> 00:28:47.430
brain power that birds exhibit.
00:28:47.440 --> 00:28:48.630
But none of them have become
00:28:48.640 --> 00:28:50.230
technological intelligences. And the
00:28:50.240 --> 00:28:52.549
search for extraterrestrial intelligence
00:28:52.559 --> 00:28:55.110
is very much centered around a
00:28:55.120 --> 00:28:58.389
technology that allows civilizations to
00:28:58.399 --> 00:29:00.710
communicate with one another. that
00:29:00.720 --> 00:29:02.549
therefore is based on many prerequisites
00:29:02.559 --> 00:29:03.830
that lead to the development of the
00:29:03.840 --> 00:29:05.510
ability to broadcast your existence to
00:29:05.520 --> 00:29:07.669
the cosmos. The coal thing's
00:29:07.679 --> 00:29:09.350
interesting. I mean, I'm not
00:29:09.360 --> 00:29:13.669
sufficiently archaeologically minded to
00:29:13.679 --> 00:29:16.149
be able to say with certainty that
00:29:16.159 --> 00:29:18.149
without coal, we wouldn't have got here.
00:29:18.159 --> 00:29:19.669
And the reason that I express caution on
00:29:19.679 --> 00:29:22.470
that coal and oil is that we have things
00:29:22.480 --> 00:29:24.950
that people burn for energy that are not
00:29:24.960 --> 00:29:26.389
coal and oil. M
00:29:26.399 --> 00:29:28.070
>> and I think a lot of the smelting that
00:29:28.080 --> 00:29:29.430
was done, and I may be wrong on this
00:29:29.440 --> 00:29:30.710
because I'm not an archaeologist. I just
00:29:30.720 --> 00:29:32.710
pick bits up when my partner's watching
00:29:32.720 --> 00:29:34.070
time team and things like that. She
00:29:34.080 --> 00:29:36.230
loves her archaeology, so I get a little
00:29:36.240 --> 00:29:38.389
bit of that as a very thin veneer. But I
00:29:38.399 --> 00:29:39.750
think a lot of the times when people
00:29:39.760 --> 00:29:41.909
smelted metals, talking about bronze and
00:29:41.919 --> 00:29:43.990
iron, they used wood or they use
00:29:44.000 --> 00:29:45.830
charcoal, which is a byproduct of
00:29:45.840 --> 00:29:46.870
burning wood.
00:29:46.880 --> 00:29:47.909
>> Yeah.
00:29:47.919 --> 00:29:50.549
So maybe it would be more challenging
00:29:50.559 --> 00:29:53.269
without the easy available energy of
00:29:53.279 --> 00:29:55.110
fossil fuels, without the easy available
00:29:55.120 --> 00:29:58.149
energy of coal, oil, gas. But it might
00:29:58.159 --> 00:29:59.110
be that that wouldn't be an
00:29:59.120 --> 00:30:00.630
insurmountable hurdle, but it would
00:30:00.640 --> 00:30:01.909
result in a different path being
00:30:01.919 --> 00:30:04.950
followed. You know, what would we get in
00:30:04.960 --> 00:30:06.549
terms of seam power if we were using
00:30:06.559 --> 00:30:08.789
wood and if we were using charcoal
00:30:08.799 --> 00:30:11.590
rather than other things? Would it lead
00:30:11.600 --> 00:30:13.269
to an earlier adoption of renewable
00:30:13.279 --> 00:30:15.430
energy in the form of wind power which
00:30:15.440 --> 00:30:17.590
was actually being used for hundreds of
00:30:17.600 --> 00:30:18.789
years? You go back to Europe and you see
00:30:18.799 --> 00:30:20.470
the windmills people use
00:30:20.480 --> 00:30:22.789
>> and watermills people's use.
00:30:22.799 --> 00:30:26.549
>> So I I don't know whether
00:30:26.559 --> 00:30:28.549
and this is a problem with all of
00:30:28.559 --> 00:30:30.389
astrobiology and it's a problem with a
00:30:30.399 --> 00:30:31.430
lot of the stuff that I'll talk about
00:30:31.440 --> 00:30:33.029
later about what makes a planet more
00:30:33.039 --> 00:30:35.269
suitable or less suitable. People have
00:30:35.279 --> 00:30:37.669
this tendency to find something that is
00:30:37.679 --> 00:30:40.070
unusual about us and there's a lot
00:30:40.080 --> 00:30:41.269
that's unusual about us. I mean there's
00:30:41.279 --> 00:30:42.549
a lot that's unusual about me and I hold
00:30:42.559 --> 00:30:45.110
my hand up about that. But they find
00:30:45.120 --> 00:30:47.269
things that are unusual
00:30:47.279 --> 00:30:49.029
and they say we are as far as we know
00:30:49.039 --> 00:30:50.470
unique in the cosmos. We are a
00:30:50.480 --> 00:30:51.990
technologically advanced civilization
00:30:52.000 --> 00:30:54.470
able to have this discussion.
00:30:54.480 --> 00:30:56.389
There has to be a reason that we're
00:30:56.399 --> 00:30:59.750
here. Everything that is unusual quite
00:30:59.760 --> 00:31:01.830
often gets held up as could this be the
00:31:01.840 --> 00:31:03.990
switch? If you didn't have this, we
00:31:04.000 --> 00:31:06.389
would not be here. And I tend to view
00:31:06.399 --> 00:31:08.149
them not as an on-off switch, but as a
00:31:08.159 --> 00:31:10.549
slider. They're like, and again, a
00:31:10.559 --> 00:31:12.070
gaming analogy would be varying the
00:31:12.080 --> 00:31:14.310
difficulty on your game. Some games,
00:31:14.320 --> 00:31:16.470
it's very kind of onoff, hard mode, easy
00:31:16.480 --> 00:31:18.230
mode. Others, particularly some of the
00:31:18.240 --> 00:31:20.230
role playing type games people play,
00:31:20.240 --> 00:31:22.630
have sliders for everything. And so, you
00:31:22.640 --> 00:31:26.230
can change things to the nth degree to
00:31:26.240 --> 00:31:28.549
tweak the challenge level. And I think
00:31:28.559 --> 00:31:30.070
all of these things like the existence
00:31:30.080 --> 00:31:34.230
of coal that get proposed as being a
00:31:34.240 --> 00:31:36.149
boundary, as being something that would
00:31:36.159 --> 00:31:38.149
be a block if you didn't have it, are
00:31:38.159 --> 00:31:39.430
actually probably more like one of those
00:31:39.440 --> 00:31:40.710
sliders. They're things that can
00:31:40.720 --> 00:31:42.230
facilitate,
00:31:42.240 --> 00:31:44.310
but it's really interesting to discuss
00:31:44.320 --> 00:31:45.990
them because we don't know how big a
00:31:46.000 --> 00:31:47.990
filter they are. We don't know how big a
00:31:48.000 --> 00:31:50.310
hurdle they are without digging into it
00:31:50.320 --> 00:31:51.750
more. And the more we can suggest these
00:31:51.760 --> 00:31:53.350
things, the more we can narrow them
00:31:53.360 --> 00:31:55.110
down. Ultimately, the only way we can
00:31:55.120 --> 00:31:57.350
finally test them is when we get a
00:31:57.360 --> 00:31:59.590
response to us, when we find
00:31:59.600 --> 00:32:02.549
technologically advanced life and then
00:32:02.559 --> 00:32:04.470
we learn about their heritage. What path
00:32:04.480 --> 00:32:07.269
did they follow? Did they invent fire
00:32:07.279 --> 00:32:10.470
before the wheel? Did they invent modern
00:32:10.480 --> 00:32:13.990
medicine before fire? And I've seen
00:32:14.000 --> 00:32:17.509
there's a fabulous famous old thread, I
00:32:17.519 --> 00:32:18.870
don't know, it wasn't from Reddit, it
00:32:18.880 --> 00:32:20.630
predates Reddit, but from one of the old
00:32:20.640 --> 00:32:24.789
messaging boards that talks about humans
00:32:24.799 --> 00:32:27.029
as the horror movie monsters of the
00:32:27.039 --> 00:32:29.750
universe. Because we always in science
00:32:29.760 --> 00:32:31.269
fiction, all the monsters we face, all
00:32:31.279 --> 00:32:33.190
the aliens we face are usually more
00:32:33.200 --> 00:32:35.110
something than us. And we overcome
00:32:35.120 --> 00:32:37.430
incredible odds to beat them. But this
00:32:37.440 --> 00:32:38.870
is taking the other perspective of
00:32:38.880 --> 00:32:40.230
another species kind of looking at us
00:32:40.240 --> 00:32:41.590
and going, "Those humans are
00:32:41.600 --> 00:32:42.950
terrifying." And it's listing all the
00:32:42.960 --> 00:32:43.990
ways we are. You know, we're an
00:32:44.000 --> 00:32:46.470
exhaustion hunter. We didn't beat things
00:32:46.480 --> 00:32:48.230
by speed or anything. We'd follow them
00:32:48.240 --> 00:32:51.430
until they died of exhaustion because we
00:32:51.440 --> 00:32:54.070
can go longer than they can. We're un
00:32:54.080 --> 00:32:55.269
they were saying, you know, it's the
00:32:55.279 --> 00:32:57.110
only intelligent technological species
00:32:57.120 --> 00:32:58.710
that invented amputation before
00:32:58.720 --> 00:33:00.630
painkillers.
00:33:00.640 --> 00:33:02.070
>> You know, we've got things like this
00:33:02.080 --> 00:33:04.870
that are very bizarre about us. So that
00:33:04.880 --> 00:33:07.350
takes this perspective I've got of these
00:33:07.360 --> 00:33:09.350
things are a hurdle and you develop
00:33:09.360 --> 00:33:11.669
things you know that things are not
00:33:11.679 --> 00:33:12.950
onoff switch but they're more of a
00:33:12.960 --> 00:33:16.070
slider and the idea of will things
00:33:16.080 --> 00:33:18.310
naturally be developed in the same order
00:33:18.320 --> 00:33:19.830
and turns it around and said what would
00:33:19.840 --> 00:33:22.549
another species think looking at us and
00:33:22.559 --> 00:33:23.990
I always find that really good fun and
00:33:24.000 --> 00:33:25.590
it's effectively leads to the thing that
00:33:25.600 --> 00:33:28.389
humans are space and we're this terri
00:33:28.399 --> 00:33:31.029
terrifying weird little species and
00:33:31.039 --> 00:33:33.430
maybe that's what it'll turn out to
00:33:33.440 --> 00:33:36.230
Well, it yeah, look, I don't uh I don't
00:33:36.240 --> 00:33:39.029
dispute that because look how we treat
00:33:39.039 --> 00:33:42.389
each other or have treated each other um
00:33:42.399 --> 00:33:45.509
since civilization began. Basically, uh
00:33:45.519 --> 00:33:47.269
I I don't think you could add up how
00:33:47.279 --> 00:33:48.870
many wars we've fought against each
00:33:48.880 --> 00:33:50.549
other.
00:33:50.559 --> 00:33:53.110
I I don't think that would stop if we
00:33:53.120 --> 00:33:55.110
found another intelligent life form. I
00:33:55.120 --> 00:33:57.029
don't think we'd go in saying, "Hi, hey,
00:33:57.039 --> 00:33:59.350
we're really nice." I I got a feeling
00:33:59.360 --> 00:34:01.110
we'd, you know, it'd be a bit
00:34:01.120 --> 00:34:03.110
adversarial.
00:34:03.120 --> 00:34:05.190
>> It It's a really It is a really
00:34:05.200 --> 00:34:06.310
interesting one. It's one of the things
00:34:06.320 --> 00:34:08.710
that people factor into a lot of the
00:34:08.720 --> 00:34:11.190
discussions about the the rights and
00:34:11.200 --> 00:34:14.869
wrongs of active SETI. So active SETI is
00:34:14.879 --> 00:34:16.310
sending out a message saying, "Hi, we're
00:34:16.320 --> 00:34:18.149
here. Please talk to us." Whereas
00:34:18.159 --> 00:34:19.750
passive SETI is listening for people
00:34:19.760 --> 00:34:21.030
saying, "Please turn neighbors off.
00:34:21.040 --> 00:34:22.230
We're sick of seeing it." You know,
00:34:22.240 --> 00:34:23.829
they're effectively the two ways you can
00:34:23.839 --> 00:34:27.109
do SETI. There are a lot of people in
00:34:27.119 --> 00:34:28.629
the past that have argued that active
00:34:28.639 --> 00:34:30.149
set is a bad idea because it will
00:34:30.159 --> 00:34:31.669
attract the wrong kind of attention.
00:34:31.679 --> 00:34:33.349
>> Well, Steven Hawking certainly thought
00:34:33.359 --> 00:34:33.990
that.
00:34:34.000 --> 00:34:37.030
>> Um, and throwing no shade, I think the
00:34:37.040 --> 00:34:38.950
great Mark Camode, who's a film reviewer
00:34:38.960 --> 00:34:41.669
in the UK, um, often says, you know,
00:34:41.679 --> 00:34:43.430
other opinions are available. They're
00:34:43.440 --> 00:34:45.669
wrong, but they are available. I mean,
00:34:45.679 --> 00:34:47.349
this, I think, is a case of that. I
00:34:47.359 --> 00:34:49.909
think if any for me, and I will admit
00:34:49.919 --> 00:34:51.589
I'm an optimist. I'm also not exactly
00:34:51.599 --> 00:34:54.149
the world's most aggressive person, but
00:34:54.159 --> 00:34:55.909
for me, if you have survived as a
00:34:55.919 --> 00:34:58.310
species for long enough to be a thriving
00:34:58.320 --> 00:35:00.150
civilization to the point of wanting to
00:35:00.160 --> 00:35:02.150
communicate to the upsc upstarts that
00:35:02.160 --> 00:35:04.150
are broadcasting, you know, Big Brother
00:35:04.160 --> 00:35:06.550
and all the rest of it to the universe,
00:35:06.560 --> 00:35:08.390
that suggests that to some degree you've
00:35:08.400 --> 00:35:10.950
overcome your martiality. Um because I
00:35:10.960 --> 00:35:13.430
think for us to survive to the point
00:35:13.440 --> 00:35:15.829
where we're moving out into the stars
00:35:15.839 --> 00:35:17.510
will require us not to first wipe
00:35:17.520 --> 00:35:19.190
ourselves out. And the more advanced you
00:35:19.200 --> 00:35:22.230
get, the more you disperse probably,
00:35:22.240 --> 00:35:24.790
fingers crossed, hopefully, the less
00:35:24.800 --> 00:35:26.310
likely that becomes. Now, we look at the
00:35:26.320 --> 00:35:27.589
world around us today, and without
00:35:27.599 --> 00:35:29.030
digging into politics, there's always
00:35:29.040 --> 00:35:30.950
something nasty going on. There's
00:35:30.960 --> 00:35:32.470
>> many, many tragedies that are both
00:35:32.480 --> 00:35:34.230
frontline in the news and forgotten by
00:35:34.240 --> 00:35:38.069
the news. But I saw a great article few
00:35:38.079 --> 00:35:40.870
years ago that was arguing that you know
00:35:40.880 --> 00:35:42.390
when was the worst time to ever live and
00:35:42.400 --> 00:35:44.230
saying that actually despite the fact
00:35:44.240 --> 00:35:46.230
that all this war all this aggression
00:35:46.240 --> 00:35:48.870
all this violence is so front and center
00:35:48.880 --> 00:35:50.870
this is actually the safest era to live
00:35:50.880 --> 00:35:53.750
in that humanity's ever experienced the
00:35:53.760 --> 00:35:55.910
number of people dying before their time
00:35:55.920 --> 00:35:58.630
dying before they reach scessians is
00:35:58.640 --> 00:36:00.390
lower per thousand people up 100
00:36:00.400 --> 00:36:02.870
thousand people than ever before you
00:36:02.880 --> 00:36:04.470
have a much lower chance as an average
00:36:04.480 --> 00:36:05.990
person of ever fighting in a war have
00:36:06.000 --> 00:36:08.390
ever been murdered or assaulted.
00:36:08.400 --> 00:36:10.550
>> So, we're already moving that way if it
00:36:10.560 --> 00:36:12.630
doesn't feel like it. And so, to me,
00:36:12.640 --> 00:36:15.589
with that optimistic viewpoint, I would
00:36:15.599 --> 00:36:17.910
like to think that there is no reason
00:36:17.920 --> 00:36:19.670
for conflict and no reason for friction.
00:36:19.680 --> 00:36:22.069
And I think a lot of the arguments that
00:36:22.079 --> 00:36:25.270
humanity's future encounters with aliens
00:36:25.280 --> 00:36:28.310
must by necessity be violent is telling
00:36:28.320 --> 00:36:29.670
you more about people than it's telling
00:36:29.680 --> 00:36:31.030
you about aliens because it's saying
00:36:31.040 --> 00:36:32.950
when we look in the mirror, we see the
00:36:32.960 --> 00:36:35.349
angry snarling tribalist. rather than
00:36:35.359 --> 00:36:38.069
the rational modern human that is a
00:36:38.079 --> 00:36:40.550
veneer on top. We're still a tribal
00:36:40.560 --> 00:36:43.190
species. We're still the product of our
00:36:43.200 --> 00:36:45.589
evolution. And society is a veneer that
00:36:45.599 --> 00:36:48.950
we put on top of that as we learn to be
00:36:48.960 --> 00:36:50.390
better, to be the kind of thinking
00:36:50.400 --> 00:36:54.069
social ape, I guess. And the evidence is
00:36:54.079 --> 00:36:55.510
that over time we're getting better at
00:36:55.520 --> 00:36:57.430
that. Even though we're now more capable
00:36:57.440 --> 00:36:59.270
of killing each other than we ever were
00:36:59.280 --> 00:36:59.990
before.
00:37:00.000 --> 00:37:00.310
>> Yeah.
00:37:00.320 --> 00:37:01.829
>> We're doing it less often.
00:37:01.839 --> 00:37:03.910
>> Yes, we are. All right. All right, we'll
00:37:03.920 --> 00:37:05.349
take a quick breather because I want to
00:37:05.359 --> 00:37:10.069
get into the um the area of u finding
00:37:10.079 --> 00:37:12.790
this life beyond our solar system. How
00:37:12.800 --> 00:37:14.230
how are we going to do it, where we're
00:37:14.240 --> 00:37:15.430
going to look, and what we've got to
00:37:15.440 --> 00:37:17.190
look for. That's all coming up on this
00:37:17.200 --> 00:37:21.670
edition of Space Nuts.
00:37:21.680 --> 00:37:23.510
>> Roger. Also,
00:37:23.520 --> 00:37:24.630
>> Space Nuts.
00:37:24.640 --> 00:37:26.790
>> So, Jotty, look, lead the way. Where do
00:37:26.800 --> 00:37:28.630
you want to go from here? We got to uh
00:37:28.640 --> 00:37:31.270
this is our final segment. So, um I
00:37:31.280 --> 00:37:33.349
suppose if you're going to try and find
00:37:33.359 --> 00:37:36.950
life beyond our solar system, uh you got
00:37:36.960 --> 00:37:39.750
to find the right environment, um you
00:37:39.760 --> 00:37:41.670
know, rocky planet, habitable zone
00:37:41.680 --> 00:37:43.990
perhaps, um
00:37:44.000 --> 00:37:45.829
>> and and there's a lot more to it than
00:37:45.839 --> 00:37:48.230
that. It's not just a planet with
00:37:48.240 --> 00:37:51.829
perhaps liquid water on its surface.
00:37:51.839 --> 00:37:53.750
There's you got to have, I suppose, the
00:37:53.760 --> 00:37:55.430
right kind of star. You don't want a red
00:37:55.440 --> 00:37:57.270
dwarf because you probably just, you
00:37:57.280 --> 00:38:00.390
know, get really bad sunburn. Uh there's
00:38:00.400 --> 00:38:02.310
a lot to take into account.
00:38:02.320 --> 00:38:03.829
>> There's a huge amount of depth to it.
00:38:03.839 --> 00:38:05.750
And I think as we saw with the previous
00:38:05.760 --> 00:38:07.349
episode, we could have talked another
00:38:07.359 --> 00:38:09.030
hour and we could have talked another
00:38:09.040 --> 00:38:10.310
week. To be honest, when we're talking
00:38:10.320 --> 00:38:12.950
about this stuff, one of the things I
00:38:12.960 --> 00:38:15.670
most adore about science is the infinite
00:38:15.680 --> 00:38:17.510
complexity. So you ask a question when
00:38:17.520 --> 00:38:18.950
you get an answer. That isn't it. But
00:38:18.960 --> 00:38:21.030
you get another 10 questions. And the
00:38:21.040 --> 00:38:22.470
more you know about a subject, the more
00:38:22.480 --> 00:38:24.230
complexity there is. To me, that's just
00:38:24.240 --> 00:38:26.550
a wonder. And that's fascinating. And
00:38:26.560 --> 00:38:28.150
this is a really good example of that.
00:38:28.160 --> 00:38:32.230
Now, one of my strongest arguments
00:38:32.240 --> 00:38:36.630
through my career has been that we can't
00:38:36.640 --> 00:38:37.750
just when we're trying to think about
00:38:37.760 --> 00:38:39.030
where we're going to search for life
00:38:39.040 --> 00:38:41.670
beyond the solar system, use a habitable
00:38:41.680 --> 00:38:43.349
zone and that's it. You know, it seems
00:38:43.359 --> 00:38:45.990
like a lot of coverage and a lot of
00:38:46.000 --> 00:38:48.150
papers just go earthlike planet found in
00:38:48.160 --> 00:38:50.870
the habitable zone. Wee and and that's
00:38:50.880 --> 00:38:53.270
about it. Now, the habitable zone has
00:38:53.280 --> 00:38:55.589
become a really effective communication
00:38:55.599 --> 00:38:56.950
tool in much the same way the Drake
00:38:56.960 --> 00:38:59.270
equation has. The Drake equation is this
00:38:59.280 --> 00:39:00.950
fabulous tool with all the sliders where
00:39:00.960 --> 00:39:03.510
you can make your own inhabited universe
00:39:03.520 --> 00:39:05.670
with lots of few aliens by varying the
00:39:05.680 --> 00:39:08.310
variables. The habitable zone has become
00:39:08.320 --> 00:39:10.390
another of these catch all kind of
00:39:10.400 --> 00:39:12.310
visualizations and it's born of the idea
00:39:12.320 --> 00:39:14.390
that life needs liquid water
00:39:14.400 --> 00:39:17.270
>> with the implicit extension of that that
00:39:17.280 --> 00:39:19.030
life needs liquid water on a planet's
00:39:19.040 --> 00:39:22.390
surface. Now that's initially motivated
00:39:22.400 --> 00:39:23.750
by the fact that the earth is the only
00:39:23.760 --> 00:39:25.990
place with life and back when this was
00:39:26.000 --> 00:39:27.109
being discussed the only place with
00:39:27.119 --> 00:39:29.349
liquid water that we knew. So therefore
00:39:29.359 --> 00:39:31.190
it was natural to say you need surface
00:39:31.200 --> 00:39:33.349
liquid water. As we discussed earlier
00:39:33.359 --> 00:39:34.870
there are plenty of places in the solar
00:39:34.880 --> 00:39:36.870
system that do not have liquid water on
00:39:36.880 --> 00:39:38.950
the surface but do have it underneath.
00:39:38.960 --> 00:39:40.950
They've got soft centers. But the
00:39:40.960 --> 00:39:43.750
habitable zone says you need liquid
00:39:43.760 --> 00:39:45.990
water on the surface of a planet for
00:39:46.000 --> 00:39:47.589
that planet to be considered suitable
00:39:47.599 --> 00:39:49.910
for life to be habitable.
00:39:49.920 --> 00:39:52.550
Now, that isn't entirely true, but for
00:39:52.560 --> 00:39:54.390
the purposes of this, it's still useful
00:39:54.400 --> 00:39:57.670
because life buried beneath ice is so
00:39:57.680 --> 00:39:59.030
hard to find that we can't find it in
00:39:59.040 --> 00:40:00.470
our own solar system because the ice is
00:40:00.480 --> 00:40:02.390
in the way. We wouldn't have a chance to
00:40:02.400 --> 00:40:03.990
run planets around other stars. So, even
00:40:04.000 --> 00:40:05.990
though I think the habitable zone is a
00:40:06.000 --> 00:40:07.990
big oversimplification, I see merit to
00:40:08.000 --> 00:40:10.310
it because life on a planet's surface
00:40:10.320 --> 00:40:13.190
with only atmosphere above is much more
00:40:13.200 --> 00:40:15.349
likely to be detectable than life burden
00:40:15.359 --> 00:40:16.950
the interior. So, fair enough, we'll go
00:40:16.960 --> 00:40:19.270
with it. The idea of the habitable zone
00:40:19.280 --> 00:40:21.109
though is that the closer you are to a
00:40:21.119 --> 00:40:22.870
star, the hotter you are. The further
00:40:22.880 --> 00:40:24.630
away you are, the cooler you are. And
00:40:24.640 --> 00:40:25.990
just like Goldilocks and the three
00:40:26.000 --> 00:40:27.270
bears, which why it's often called the
00:40:27.280 --> 00:40:28.790
Goldilock zone, there's a place where
00:40:28.800 --> 00:40:30.470
it's just right. It's not too hot, not
00:40:30.480 --> 00:40:31.670
too cold,
00:40:31.680 --> 00:40:32.870
>> and therefore there could be liquid
00:40:32.880 --> 00:40:35.190
water on the surface of the planet. Now,
00:40:35.200 --> 00:40:36.790
a lot of the time when people say a
00:40:36.800 --> 00:40:39.670
planet is in the habitable zone,
00:40:39.680 --> 00:40:42.230
that's often taken as meaning that
00:40:42.240 --> 00:40:44.550
planet could and potentially will have
00:40:44.560 --> 00:40:46.390
liquid water on the surface. But
00:40:46.400 --> 00:40:48.630
actually what it's saying is if you took
00:40:48.640 --> 00:40:51.589
the Earth as the Earth is today and put
00:40:51.599 --> 00:40:53.670
it in that system, would it still look
00:40:53.680 --> 00:40:54.950
like the Earth? Would it have liquid
00:40:54.960 --> 00:40:58.390
water on its surface? Now we've extended
00:40:58.400 --> 00:41:00.230
a bit beyond that. There are a couple of
00:41:00.240 --> 00:41:01.829
fabulous papers bit more than a decade
00:41:01.839 --> 00:41:03.990
old now that set what are our very
00:41:04.000 --> 00:41:05.910
contemporary scientific mathematical
00:41:05.920 --> 00:41:08.069
definitions of the habitable zone that
00:41:08.079 --> 00:41:10.390
people use for their papers. And they
00:41:10.400 --> 00:41:12.470
take the flux from the star, take into
00:41:12.480 --> 00:41:13.750
account the different colors of the
00:41:13.760 --> 00:41:16.150
stars. And there are two versions.
00:41:16.160 --> 00:41:17.990
There's the optimistic and conservative
00:41:18.000 --> 00:41:20.790
versions where the optimistic version is
00:41:20.800 --> 00:41:22.950
a wider set of distances and the
00:41:22.960 --> 00:41:24.550
conservative version is a smaller set of
00:41:24.560 --> 00:41:27.190
distances. But it effectively uses Venus
00:41:27.200 --> 00:41:29.510
and Mars as a roughing edge in our solar
00:41:29.520 --> 00:41:31.109
system and then scales that window up
00:41:31.119 --> 00:41:32.950
and down depending on the kind of star
00:41:32.960 --> 00:41:34.150
you're around.
00:41:34.160 --> 00:41:37.349
>> But that illustrates immediately
00:41:37.359 --> 00:41:39.270
that this is an oversimplification
00:41:39.280 --> 00:41:40.790
because you can do a thought experiment.
00:41:40.800 --> 00:41:42.870
Let's take our solar system. Venus is
00:41:42.880 --> 00:41:45.030
way too hot. Mars is way too cold and
00:41:45.040 --> 00:41:46.710
the Earth is just right. All well and
00:41:46.720 --> 00:41:49.349
good. Swap the Earth. Sorry, swap Mars
00:41:49.359 --> 00:41:51.430
and Venus around. If you put Venus where
00:41:51.440 --> 00:41:53.670
Mars is, Venus's thick atmosphere and
00:41:53.680 --> 00:41:54.790
greenhouse effect wouldn't mean it would
00:41:54.800 --> 00:41:56.069
be warm enough liquid water on the
00:41:56.079 --> 00:41:57.510
surface. It wouldn't have cooled as much
00:41:57.520 --> 00:42:01.349
as Mars. So Venus would be habitable on
00:42:01.359 --> 00:42:04.150
the surface outside the habitable zone.
00:42:04.160 --> 00:42:06.069
If you put Mars where Venus is, with its
00:42:06.079 --> 00:42:07.829
very thin and tenuous atmosphere, it
00:42:07.839 --> 00:42:10.309
doesn't have much greenhouse effect at
00:42:10.319 --> 00:42:12.550
all. Mars would potentially still be
00:42:12.560 --> 00:42:15.510
habitable where Venus is when Venus
00:42:15.520 --> 00:42:17.829
isn't. And so that's immediately
00:42:17.839 --> 00:42:19.430
pointing that this story is actually
00:42:19.440 --> 00:42:21.190
significantly more complex.
00:42:21.200 --> 00:42:21.589
>> Yeah.
00:42:21.599 --> 00:42:25.190
>> That you can't just say, let's calculate
00:42:25.200 --> 00:42:26.950
the habitable zone. Let's calculate the
00:42:26.960 --> 00:42:29.109
equilibrium temperature on a planet,
00:42:29.119 --> 00:42:31.750
which is a temperature it would have if
00:42:31.760 --> 00:42:33.510
it didn't have a greenhouse effect that
00:42:33.520 --> 00:42:35.829
it was a certain reflectivity and it was
00:42:35.839 --> 00:42:37.109
in equilibrium with the light coming in
00:42:37.119 --> 00:42:39.030
and the light going out. And if that
00:42:39.040 --> 00:42:40.710
temperature is from about minus20
00:42:40.720 --> 00:42:42.710
upwards, it's probably warm enough for
00:42:42.720 --> 00:42:43.910
water because, well, you'll have a bit
00:42:43.920 --> 00:42:46.069
of an atmosphere. To me, that's never
00:42:46.079 --> 00:42:48.150
been enough. Now, the reason it's really
00:42:48.160 --> 00:42:50.069
important, at least from my perspective,
00:42:50.079 --> 00:42:53.030
is that finding planets is hard. We'll
00:42:53.040 --> 00:42:55.750
talk about that in another episode, but
00:42:55.760 --> 00:42:58.309
once you find the first of something,
00:42:58.319 --> 00:43:00.069
astronomy, history, and probably every
00:43:00.079 --> 00:43:01.349
other form of scientific endeavor,
00:43:01.359 --> 00:43:02.790
history tells us, finding the first of
00:43:02.800 --> 00:43:04.630
something is hard. But once you've got
00:43:04.640 --> 00:43:06.230
one, you quickly find more and more as
00:43:06.240 --> 00:43:08.390
your technology gets better. Finding
00:43:08.400 --> 00:43:10.710
evidence of life on a planet that is
00:43:10.720 --> 00:43:13.829
similar to the Earth is fundamentally at
00:43:13.839 --> 00:43:15.670
least an order of magnitude if not more
00:43:15.680 --> 00:43:18.550
harder than finding that planet was. So
00:43:18.560 --> 00:43:20.069
it'll take time for our technology to
00:43:20.079 --> 00:43:22.390
get good enough to search comfortably
00:43:22.400 --> 00:43:24.790
for life elsewhere. So initially that
00:43:24.800 --> 00:43:26.390
search is going to be very restricted
00:43:26.400 --> 00:43:28.790
because we've got limited resources. So
00:43:28.800 --> 00:43:30.069
you're only going to be able to look at
00:43:30.079 --> 00:43:32.790
a few planets aggressively at first to
00:43:32.800 --> 00:43:34.870
try and tease out any indication of
00:43:34.880 --> 00:43:37.270
life. But you're going to have loads to
00:43:37.280 --> 00:43:38.710
choose from. How should you choose?
00:43:38.720 --> 00:43:40.790
Well, to me, it can't just be the
00:43:40.800 --> 00:43:44.069
habitable zone.
00:43:44.079 --> 00:43:47.670
>> Yeah, that's a valid point. Um, and and
00:43:47.680 --> 00:43:50.069
we've reached a point where we've found
00:43:50.079 --> 00:43:52.630
thousands upon thousands of exoplanets
00:43:52.640 --> 00:43:54.630
and counting. Like, we haven't stopped.
00:43:54.640 --> 00:43:55.990
We're finding them more and more and
00:43:56.000 --> 00:43:58.710
more often of all different shapes of
00:43:58.720 --> 00:44:02.069
sides sizes. Um,
00:44:02.079 --> 00:44:04.309
some rocky planets, they've been harder
00:44:04.319 --> 00:44:06.150
to find cuz they're they're usually much
00:44:06.160 --> 00:44:09.190
smaller and and don't sort of indicate
00:44:09.200 --> 00:44:12.470
themselves like a gas giant does. But
00:44:12.480 --> 00:44:15.109
we're getting better at finding uh rocky
00:44:15.119 --> 00:44:17.910
planets. Um,
00:44:17.920 --> 00:44:20.309
I suppose the big question is given how
00:44:20.319 --> 00:44:23.589
much we are finding, how do you identify
00:44:23.599 --> 00:44:25.670
prime targets for life?
00:44:25.680 --> 00:44:28.069
>> Yeah. And that is what the paper that I
00:44:28.079 --> 00:44:29.829
put together with Barry Jones back in
00:44:29.839 --> 00:44:33.030
2010 was all about. So Barry was a very
00:44:33.040 --> 00:44:34.790
dear friend of mine. He was my boss when
00:44:34.800 --> 00:44:36.870
I moved to the Open University from 2006
00:44:36.880 --> 00:44:38.710
to 2009. I think he knew Fred very well
00:44:38.720 --> 00:44:40.550
as well. So you can always mention to
00:44:40.560 --> 00:44:42.309
Fred that we talked about Barry. I
00:44:42.319 --> 00:44:44.069
started work at the Open University in
00:44:44.079 --> 00:44:45.990
2006 on the day Barry was forced to
00:44:46.000 --> 00:44:47.670
retire by the government because he'd
00:44:47.680 --> 00:44:50.230
hit 67. So he hired me and promptly
00:44:50.240 --> 00:44:53.190
retired but um he kept working anyway as
00:44:53.200 --> 00:44:56.309
ameritus professor. And Barry and I did
00:44:56.319 --> 00:44:57.670
a lot of work on this during my time
00:44:57.680 --> 00:44:59.349
there. Barry unfortunately passed away a
00:44:59.359 --> 00:45:00.790
little bit more than a decade ago. So
00:45:00.800 --> 00:45:03.270
he's fondly remembered. I organized a an
00:45:03.280 --> 00:45:05.109
award in the UK in his memory every
00:45:05.119 --> 00:45:07.589
couple of years. What we did in this
00:45:07.599 --> 00:45:11.829
2010 paper was to essentially have the
00:45:11.839 --> 00:45:13.829
thought process we just outlined. So,
00:45:13.839 --> 00:45:15.990
we're going to have a huge number of
00:45:16.000 --> 00:45:18.230
potential exo earths, planets that could
00:45:18.240 --> 00:45:20.630
potentially be Earthlike that could be
00:45:20.640 --> 00:45:23.109
places to look for life, but we're only
00:45:23.119 --> 00:45:24.630
going to be able to search a handful of
00:45:24.640 --> 00:45:27.030
them initially. So, what should we do to
00:45:27.040 --> 00:45:29.910
select the best target? Now, obviously,
00:45:29.920 --> 00:45:31.990
the closer the planet's hosts are is to
00:45:32.000 --> 00:45:33.270
the solar system, the easier the
00:45:33.280 --> 00:45:35.670
observations will be. That's just a
00:45:35.680 --> 00:45:37.589
fundamental thing of if you're twice as
00:45:37.599 --> 00:45:39.270
far away, we only receive a quarter as
00:45:39.280 --> 00:45:41.270
much light from you. But also, if you're
00:45:41.280 --> 00:45:42.870
twice as far away, the separation
00:45:42.880 --> 00:45:44.390
between the planet and the star on the
00:45:44.400 --> 00:45:47.589
sky will be half as much because the
00:45:47.599 --> 00:45:49.109
angle gets smaller the further away you
00:45:49.119 --> 00:45:51.270
go essentially. And we will want targets
00:45:51.280 --> 00:45:52.710
that are far enough from the star in the
00:45:52.720 --> 00:45:54.069
sky that with future missions like
00:45:54.079 --> 00:45:55.349
potentially the habitable world's
00:45:55.359 --> 00:45:57.510
observatory, we can separate the light
00:45:57.520 --> 00:45:58.870
from the planet from the light from the
00:45:58.880 --> 00:46:01.829
star. So, probably even more important
00:46:01.839 --> 00:46:03.750
than the habitable zone is this
00:46:03.760 --> 00:46:06.790
proximity thing. The planets in the main
00:46:06.800 --> 00:46:08.950
found by the Kepler space telescope
00:46:08.960 --> 00:46:10.230
won't be suitable for this search
00:46:10.240 --> 00:46:12.150
because they're mainly very far from the
00:46:12.160 --> 00:46:14.390
sun and so therefore they'll be very
00:46:14.400 --> 00:46:16.069
hard to study. We want to look locally.
00:46:16.079 --> 00:46:18.309
That's a given,
00:46:18.319 --> 00:46:20.309
but we want to look for places where
00:46:20.319 --> 00:46:22.150
there is the possibility of liquid water
00:46:22.160 --> 00:46:24.390
on the surface because that means that
00:46:24.400 --> 00:46:25.829
the life will be in contact with the
00:46:25.839 --> 00:46:27.190
atmosphere and that might generate a
00:46:27.200 --> 00:46:28.390
signature we can detect in the
00:46:28.400 --> 00:46:29.349
atmosphere.
00:46:29.359 --> 00:46:30.630
>> And that's where the habitable zone
00:46:30.640 --> 00:46:33.109
comes from. But there's actually much
00:46:33.119 --> 00:46:35.109
more to it than that I think. And I'm
00:46:35.119 --> 00:46:36.950
far from able to give an exhaustive list
00:46:36.960 --> 00:46:38.710
because I'm not an expert in all all
00:46:38.720 --> 00:46:41.349
areas of astronomy. But we decided to
00:46:41.359 --> 00:46:44.150
put together a review paper which about
00:46:44.160 --> 00:46:46.870
32 pages long, probably a little bit
00:46:46.880 --> 00:46:48.390
outdated now because science has moved
00:46:48.400 --> 00:46:51.910
forward, but was saying effectively you
00:46:51.920 --> 00:46:54.309
can't just use a habitable zone. We need
00:46:54.319 --> 00:46:56.550
to think about all of the different
00:46:56.560 --> 00:46:58.309
factors that can contribute to make a
00:46:58.319 --> 00:46:59.910
planet more or less suitable for life.
00:46:59.920 --> 00:47:02.069
Now, many of these have been in the past
00:47:02.079 --> 00:47:04.230
suggested as that onoff switch. And I do
00:47:04.240 --> 00:47:06.230
think that they're more sliders like the
00:47:06.240 --> 00:47:07.750
numbers in the Drake equation or sliders
00:47:07.760 --> 00:47:10.230
on a mixing desk. But there are a lot of
00:47:10.240 --> 00:47:11.109
different things that have been
00:47:11.119 --> 00:47:13.270
suggested. And as I dug into the paper,
00:47:13.280 --> 00:47:14.790
there were even more than I thought of.
00:47:14.800 --> 00:47:17.109
You can broadly break them down into
00:47:17.119 --> 00:47:19.589
four areas. The first is galactic
00:47:19.599 --> 00:47:22.790
influences. So the impact of the galaxy
00:47:22.800 --> 00:47:24.710
itself, where you are in the galaxy,
00:47:24.720 --> 00:47:26.390
stuff like that. You've then got stellar
00:47:26.400 --> 00:47:28.790
influences, so the role of the star.
00:47:28.800 --> 00:47:30.230
You've got the planetary system. And
00:47:30.240 --> 00:47:31.910
then you've got the planet itself. So th
00:47:31.920 --> 00:47:34.870
those the kind of four broad areas. The
00:47:34.880 --> 00:47:37.270
galactic influences one is probably the
00:47:37.280 --> 00:47:38.470
least useful and the least well
00:47:38.480 --> 00:47:40.390
constrained. But the idea of the
00:47:40.400 --> 00:47:42.710
galactic influence is tied a bit to a
00:47:42.720 --> 00:47:44.230
theory that's been put forward by a few
00:47:44.240 --> 00:47:45.750
people called the galactic habitable
00:47:45.760 --> 00:47:50.069
zone. It's an idea that ties back to the
00:47:50.079 --> 00:47:51.910
origin of stars and planets and also to
00:47:51.920 --> 00:47:53.510
the dangers that are experienced because
00:47:53.520 --> 00:47:55.910
of your environment. The idea that as
00:47:55.920 --> 00:47:57.670
time goes on, the universe is becoming
00:47:57.680 --> 00:48:00.230
more metalrich. And by that I mean
00:48:00.240 --> 00:48:01.510
enriched in everything other than
00:48:01.520 --> 00:48:03.109
hydrogen and helium because generations
00:48:03.119 --> 00:48:05.510
of stars run their furnaces and turn the
00:48:05.520 --> 00:48:07.109
light elements to the heavy ones and put
00:48:07.119 --> 00:48:09.270
them back into the cosmos. You need a
00:48:09.280 --> 00:48:10.950
certain amount of heavy elements to form
00:48:10.960 --> 00:48:12.710
planets like the Earth and to have the
00:48:12.720 --> 00:48:15.829
carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus for life.
00:48:15.839 --> 00:48:17.670
So as time goes on, the universe getting
00:48:17.680 --> 00:48:19.670
more enriched is a good thing. But
00:48:19.680 --> 00:48:21.750
there's also possibilities that too much
00:48:21.760 --> 00:48:23.349
enrichment will change the chemistry or
00:48:23.359 --> 00:48:25.589
it will make planet formation too easy.
00:48:25.599 --> 00:48:27.750
There's all sorts. So you might have a
00:48:27.760 --> 00:48:30.710
sweet spot from that side of things. Now
00:48:30.720 --> 00:48:32.470
in the middle of the galaxy, star
00:48:32.480 --> 00:48:34.150
formation occurs at a more rapid pace
00:48:34.160 --> 00:48:36.549
and stars live and die quicker. So you
00:48:36.559 --> 00:48:39.990
get faster change in the abundance of
00:48:40.000 --> 00:48:42.150
materials. So you can imagine we have
00:48:42.160 --> 00:48:43.430
this concept in astronomy called
00:48:43.440 --> 00:48:45.990
metallicity which is the amount it's
00:48:46.000 --> 00:48:47.109
usually measured in the amount of
00:48:47.119 --> 00:48:49.349
hydrogen compared to the amount of iron
00:48:49.359 --> 00:48:51.589
in a star and that gives you a number on
00:48:51.599 --> 00:48:53.990
a logarithmic scale and that is a an
00:48:54.000 --> 00:48:56.069
approximation to when the star formed
00:48:56.079 --> 00:48:57.670
and how enriched the world was at the
00:48:57.680 --> 00:48:59.589
time and as time goes on things get more
00:48:59.599 --> 00:49:02.069
and more metalrich within our galaxy
00:49:02.079 --> 00:49:03.510
you'd expect there to be a gradient in
00:49:03.520 --> 00:49:04.950
this. So the things near the middle will
00:49:04.960 --> 00:49:06.870
be much more enriched in heavy elements
00:49:06.880 --> 00:49:08.710
of things near the outer edge and
00:49:08.720 --> 00:49:09.990
there's probably sweet spot in the
00:49:10.000 --> 00:49:12.150
middle that moves outwards over time
00:49:12.160 --> 00:49:13.990
where conditions to form planets like
00:49:14.000 --> 00:49:15.670
the earth and planetary systems like the
00:49:15.680 --> 00:49:18.470
solar system are perfect. So that's part
00:49:18.480 --> 00:49:20.309
of the galactic habitable zone idea. The
00:49:20.319 --> 00:49:22.470
other idea is that if you're too close
00:49:22.480 --> 00:49:25.109
in and the stellar density is too high,
00:49:25.119 --> 00:49:26.790
eventually the stellar density gets so
00:49:26.800 --> 00:49:28.549
high that the likelihood of life being
00:49:28.559 --> 00:49:31.109
exterminated by nearby supernovi or
00:49:31.119 --> 00:49:32.549
planetary systems being stripped and
00:49:32.559 --> 00:49:34.710
disrupted becomes too high. So there's
00:49:34.720 --> 00:49:36.710
always been this idea that location
00:49:36.720 --> 00:49:39.990
within the galaxy is important. The
00:49:40.000 --> 00:49:42.790
challenge to that is twofold. Firstly,
00:49:42.800 --> 00:49:44.470
the proximity argument. We're going to
00:49:44.480 --> 00:49:45.670
have to look at stars that are very
00:49:45.680 --> 00:49:47.910
nearby which are all at the same
00:49:47.920 --> 00:49:48.950
distance from in the middle of the
00:49:48.960 --> 00:49:51.510
galaxy as we are. So where you are in
00:49:51.520 --> 00:49:54.230
the galaxy won't realistically impact
00:49:54.240 --> 00:49:55.430
this search because we're going to be
00:49:55.440 --> 00:49:57.430
looking locally. The other things though
00:49:57.440 --> 00:49:59.190
is that stars have a huge degree of
00:49:59.200 --> 00:50:01.349
mobility. There was a recent story
00:50:01.359 --> 00:50:03.510
talking about finding s solar twins,
00:50:03.520 --> 00:50:05.109
stars that have the same chemistry as
00:50:05.119 --> 00:50:07.030
the sun that may have formed with the
00:50:07.040 --> 00:50:09.990
sun and a suggestion that the sun and
00:50:10.000 --> 00:50:11.589
other stars may have formed as much as
00:50:11.599 --> 00:50:13.270
10,000 light years nearer the middle of
00:50:13.280 --> 00:50:15.349
the galaxy than we are now. Stars are
00:50:15.359 --> 00:50:17.109
getting scattered inwards and outwards.
00:50:17.119 --> 00:50:19.589
So seeing a star here now doesn't imply
00:50:19.599 --> 00:50:21.430
that it's always been here.
00:50:21.440 --> 00:50:21.750
>> Yeah.
00:50:21.760 --> 00:50:24.230
>> So the galactic influences I'm not going
00:50:24.240 --> 00:50:25.910
to go into really any more than that,
00:50:25.920 --> 00:50:27.270
but it's worth knowing that they're
00:50:27.280 --> 00:50:28.950
there. It's worth knowing that it's
00:50:28.960 --> 00:50:30.150
point of discussion and that there is
00:50:30.160 --> 00:50:32.309
good research going on about this. It's
00:50:32.319 --> 00:50:34.069
really interesting area, but it doesn't,
00:50:34.079 --> 00:50:36.069
I think, impact our initial search for
00:50:36.079 --> 00:50:39.510
life because we're going to be searching
00:50:39.520 --> 00:50:41.270
our local area. So, it's a bit like me
00:50:41.280 --> 00:50:42.710
saying I want to search for signs of
00:50:42.720 --> 00:50:44.870
life on Earth. It's a lot easier for me
00:50:44.880 --> 00:50:47.510
to search in King Soap where I live than
00:50:47.520 --> 00:50:50.470
to search in Mumbai or in London, places
00:50:50.480 --> 00:50:52.710
like this. You've got to look locally.
00:50:52.720 --> 00:50:54.470
Now, talking about that, you know, what
00:50:54.480 --> 00:50:55.910
would I expect to find?
00:50:55.920 --> 00:50:58.470
you know the people in King have not all
00:50:58.480 --> 00:50:59.670
but many of them have a similar
00:50:59.680 --> 00:51:01.190
background to me formed in similar ways
00:51:01.200 --> 00:51:03.829
with similar culture all the rest of it
00:51:03.839 --> 00:51:06.790
so this it's a not a great analogy I
00:51:06.800 --> 00:51:08.710
admit but we've got to look locally so
00:51:08.720 --> 00:51:11.589
the galactic influences stuff is
00:51:11.599 --> 00:51:15.349
interesting but I wouldn't say it is a
00:51:15.359 --> 00:51:18.230
big factor but it's worth noting I guess
00:51:18.240 --> 00:51:22.630
>> so that leads us on to um I don't know
00:51:22.640 --> 00:51:25.510
finding the right targets uh And and if
00:51:25.520 --> 00:51:28.470
we do find those targets,
00:51:28.480 --> 00:51:31.670
what what do we do then to look for
00:51:31.680 --> 00:51:33.510
potential life on those targets?
00:51:33.520 --> 00:51:34.950
>> Absolutely. And that's a very hard
00:51:34.960 --> 00:51:36.470
question. Now, in terms of finding the
00:51:36.480 --> 00:51:37.990
right targets, there's a lot that comes
00:51:38.000 --> 00:51:43.190
into it from the star itself. Now, stars
00:51:43.200 --> 00:51:45.589
live very long lives. First question
00:51:45.599 --> 00:51:47.349
then is how old is a star? Now, if we
00:51:47.359 --> 00:51:49.510
look at life on Earth, the oldest
00:51:49.520 --> 00:51:51.109
fossils on Earth that are widely
00:51:51.119 --> 00:51:52.950
accepted are about 3 and a half thousand
00:51:52.960 --> 00:51:54.790
million years old are in the Pilra,
00:51:54.800 --> 00:51:56.630
which is about a billion years after the
00:51:56.640 --> 00:51:58.470
Earth formed. There are some that are
00:51:58.480 --> 00:52:00.150
older that are still controversial,
00:52:00.160 --> 00:52:01.750
possibly as old as 4 billion years. But
00:52:01.760 --> 00:52:04.150
if we take the 3 1/2 billion years as a
00:52:04.160 --> 00:52:06.069
threshold and we do what we're doing
00:52:06.079 --> 00:52:07.510
with the liquid water thing and we say
00:52:07.520 --> 00:52:09.270
we expect life to follow a similar path
00:52:09.280 --> 00:52:11.750
to us, the fact that it took a billion
00:52:11.760 --> 00:52:13.270
years for life to get established enough
00:52:13.280 --> 00:52:15.589
to leave fossils we could find possibly
00:52:15.599 --> 00:52:16.950
means that it might have taken a similar
00:52:16.960 --> 00:52:18.470
length of time for that life to modify
00:52:18.480 --> 00:52:19.990
its environment enough to be detectable
00:52:20.000 --> 00:52:21.829
from elsewhere. So we can put an
00:52:21.839 --> 00:52:24.230
arbitrary kind of timer here saying that
00:52:24.240 --> 00:52:26.870
any planetary system younger than say a
00:52:26.880 --> 00:52:29.430
billion years may have planets that are
00:52:29.440 --> 00:52:30.870
suitable for life but that life might
00:52:30.880 --> 00:52:32.470
have not had enough time to get
00:52:32.480 --> 00:52:35.910
established yet. So that might
00:52:35.920 --> 00:52:37.990
immediately say that's not as good a
00:52:38.000 --> 00:52:39.349
place to look as a star that is more
00:52:39.359 --> 00:52:41.349
like the age of the sun where life's had
00:52:41.359 --> 00:52:43.589
four billion years to get going. Now
00:52:43.599 --> 00:52:46.790
tied to that is the fact that the lives
00:52:46.800 --> 00:52:48.390
of stars are very dependent on their
00:52:48.400 --> 00:52:50.549
mass. So the more massive a star is, the
00:52:50.559 --> 00:52:52.069
brighter it shines, but the shorter its
00:52:52.079 --> 00:52:55.349
life is. And at a very rough level, this
00:52:55.359 --> 00:52:56.710
number varies a little bit depending on
00:52:56.720 --> 00:52:58.870
the mass of the star. But typically the
00:52:58.880 --> 00:53:00.790
luminosity of a star is proportional to
00:53:00.800 --> 00:53:03.030
its mass to the power four. So if you've
00:53:03.040 --> 00:53:04.549
got a star that is 10 times the mass of
00:53:04.559 --> 00:53:06.710
the sun, it will be roughly 10,000 times
00:53:06.720 --> 00:53:09.270
brighter than the sun. But these stars
00:53:09.280 --> 00:53:10.710
are burning their own material. They're
00:53:10.720 --> 00:53:12.150
turning hydrogen to helium and they're
00:53:12.160 --> 00:53:14.230
made of hydrogen. So a star that is 10
00:53:14.240 --> 00:53:16.309
times the mass of the sun will only have
00:53:16.319 --> 00:53:18.710
10 times as much fuel as a sun. But it's
00:53:18.720 --> 00:53:21.109
burning that fuel 10,000 times quicker,
00:53:21.119 --> 00:53:23.190
which means it'll run out a lot quicker.
00:53:23.200 --> 00:53:24.710
And what that means is that the more
00:53:24.720 --> 00:53:26.950
massive a star is, the longer, the
00:53:26.960 --> 00:53:28.870
shorter its life will be. And the less
00:53:28.880 --> 00:53:30.309
massive a star is, the longer its life
00:53:30.319 --> 00:53:33.349
will be. That means that beyond a
00:53:33.359 --> 00:53:35.829
certain stellar mass, the star will die
00:53:35.839 --> 00:53:38.230
before that billionyear cutoff. So we
00:53:38.240 --> 00:53:39.670
can probably rule out the most massive
00:53:39.680 --> 00:53:41.670
stars. They'll just live fast, die
00:53:41.680 --> 00:53:43.430
young, and it's unlikely that life will
00:53:43.440 --> 00:53:45.750
get well enough established. On the flip
00:53:45.760 --> 00:53:47.349
side, the dim little red dwarfs will
00:53:47.359 --> 00:53:48.790
just go forever. You know, Proxima
00:53:48.800 --> 00:53:50.390
Centtory will still be traveling along
00:53:50.400 --> 00:53:52.069
in a trillion years when we're a distant
00:53:52.079 --> 00:53:54.150
memory. So, they might be a good place
00:53:54.160 --> 00:53:56.470
to look. The challenge there though is
00:53:56.480 --> 00:53:59.349
that those stars are quite active quite
00:53:59.359 --> 00:54:02.069
often. And to be in the habitable zone
00:54:02.079 --> 00:54:03.270
around them, you've got to be very close
00:54:03.280 --> 00:54:04.710
in because they're called little embers.
00:54:04.720 --> 00:54:06.549
You've got to snuggle up to the fire. So
00:54:06.559 --> 00:54:07.910
there's a lot of discussion about the
00:54:07.920 --> 00:54:10.390
fact that M dwarf planets planets around
00:54:10.400 --> 00:54:12.309
these coolest smallest stars are
00:54:12.319 --> 00:54:13.750
probably not ideal places to look for
00:54:13.760 --> 00:54:15.990
knife initially. Few reasons. One is
00:54:16.000 --> 00:54:17.990
that activity and a lot of discussions
00:54:18.000 --> 00:54:19.510
that the activity of red dwarfs when
00:54:19.520 --> 00:54:20.870
they're young could scour a planet's
00:54:20.880 --> 00:54:22.630
atmosphere away and that seems to have
00:54:22.640 --> 00:54:24.150
possibly been backed up with a trappist
00:54:24.160 --> 00:54:26.950
one planets that all seem to be airless
00:54:26.960 --> 00:54:29.990
worlds. The other is that those planets,
00:54:30.000 --> 00:54:31.910
if they are close enough in to be warm
00:54:31.920 --> 00:54:33.270
enough for liquid water on the surface,
00:54:33.280 --> 00:54:35.270
would have to be tidily locked like the
00:54:35.280 --> 00:54:37.109
moon is to the earth, which means
00:54:37.119 --> 00:54:38.390
they'll keep one face permanently
00:54:38.400 --> 00:54:39.750
pointed towards the star and the other
00:54:39.760 --> 00:54:42.309
permanently away, which may make it
00:54:42.319 --> 00:54:43.910
harder to look for light on them. It
00:54:43.920 --> 00:54:45.670
might be the case that any life would be
00:54:45.680 --> 00:54:47.670
on the sunwood side, and that's kind of
00:54:47.680 --> 00:54:49.030
hard to observe because when that side
00:54:49.040 --> 00:54:51.349
is best presented to us, it's near the
00:54:51.359 --> 00:54:54.069
star. So, that's challenging. Another
00:54:54.079 --> 00:54:56.069
thing that factors into it ties into
00:54:56.079 --> 00:54:57.829
something called the faint early sun
00:54:57.839 --> 00:55:01.510
paradox on Earth. The
00:55:01.520 --> 00:55:03.750
lives of stars, they shine brightly.
00:55:03.760 --> 00:55:05.349
Their brightness is measured compared to
00:55:05.359 --> 00:55:06.950
their mass, but their brightness
00:55:06.960 --> 00:55:09.030
increases with time. Stars get more
00:55:09.040 --> 00:55:10.549
luminous as they age a little bit. And
00:55:10.559 --> 00:55:13.349
it's a slow process. But with the sun,
00:55:13.359 --> 00:55:16.790
we think the sun was 30% dimmer when it
00:55:16.800 --> 00:55:19.510
was born to how it is now. So that means
00:55:19.520 --> 00:55:21.510
the earth at the time got 30% less
00:55:21.520 --> 00:55:24.150
energy which would have put it with its
00:55:24.160 --> 00:55:26.150
current atmosphere
00:55:26.160 --> 00:55:29.430
too cold to support life. Um that was
00:55:29.440 --> 00:55:30.790
offset by the fact we had a very
00:55:30.800 --> 00:55:32.069
different atmosphere then and a
00:55:32.079 --> 00:55:33.589
significant
00:55:33.599 --> 00:55:35.829
greenhouse effect which was lessened due
00:55:35.839 --> 00:55:38.309
to the influence of life stripping out
00:55:38.319 --> 00:55:39.990
carbon dioxide particularly from the
00:55:40.000 --> 00:55:41.829
atmosphere and keeping us mostly there
00:55:41.839 --> 00:55:44.390
and thereabouts. But what that means is
00:55:44.400 --> 00:55:47.030
that if we find a planet now and that
00:55:47.040 --> 00:55:48.309
planet is near the outer edge of the
00:55:48.319 --> 00:55:50.150
habitable zone, everybody will go,
00:55:50.160 --> 00:55:51.430
"Well, it's in the habitable zone.
00:55:51.440 --> 00:55:53.750
That's great." Whereas my question would
00:55:53.760 --> 00:55:55.270
then be, "But how long has it been in
00:55:55.280 --> 00:55:57.190
the habitable zone?" Because when the
00:55:57.200 --> 00:55:59.349
star was younger, it was a little bit
00:55:59.359 --> 00:56:01.190
dimmer. The habitable zone would have
00:56:01.200 --> 00:56:02.549
been closer in, and that planet might
00:56:02.559 --> 00:56:04.630
well have been outside it. So, I don't
00:56:04.640 --> 00:56:05.829
necessarily think that that 1
00:56:05.839 --> 00:56:08.390
billionyear clock would start until the
00:56:08.400 --> 00:56:09.829
planet was in the habitable zone. So
00:56:09.839 --> 00:56:11.349
we'll probably then be able to rule some
00:56:11.359 --> 00:56:14.950
planets out on the basis of the fact
00:56:14.960 --> 00:56:17.190
that they could be in the habitable zone
00:56:17.200 --> 00:56:18.630
now, but they haven't been full long
00:56:18.640 --> 00:56:19.430
enough.
00:56:19.440 --> 00:56:19.589
>> Yeah.
00:56:19.599 --> 00:56:21.589
>> So the star has all these effects. Never
00:56:21.599 --> 00:56:23.829
mind the fact that astronomers often
00:56:23.839 --> 00:56:25.349
joke that three out of every two stars
00:56:25.359 --> 00:56:28.150
are in a multiple star system. um
00:56:28.160 --> 00:56:30.950
multiple stars are very very common and
00:56:30.960 --> 00:56:32.870
that adds a whole extra level of
00:56:32.880 --> 00:56:35.670
complexity both to the understanding of
00:56:35.680 --> 00:56:37.430
the lives of the planets in those stars
00:56:37.440 --> 00:56:39.829
but also in our ability to study them
00:56:39.839 --> 00:56:41.349
because you've got more than one stars
00:56:41.359 --> 00:56:43.670
like to factor in all close together.
00:56:43.680 --> 00:56:45.349
It's much nastier and much more
00:56:45.359 --> 00:56:47.510
complicated. So there's a lot of ways
00:56:47.520 --> 00:56:49.349
that the stars can factor in and I think
00:56:49.359 --> 00:56:52.309
that's only a very very broad brush
00:56:52.319 --> 00:56:54.630
strokes for view. But you can see how
00:56:54.640 --> 00:56:56.309
what I'm thinking is you can bring in
00:56:56.319 --> 00:56:59.190
all these different ideas and have them
00:56:59.200 --> 00:57:01.510
as a slider. This kind of star could
00:57:01.520 --> 00:57:02.950
have planets around it with life, but
00:57:02.960 --> 00:57:05.510
it's not as good a target as this one.
00:57:05.520 --> 00:57:06.710
Now, everybody could build their own
00:57:06.720 --> 00:57:08.150
algorithm out of this, but I'd like to
00:57:08.160 --> 00:57:09.510
think that when we're trying to pick the
00:57:09.520 --> 00:57:12.390
target, you take into account the star
00:57:12.400 --> 00:57:14.069
that it's going around, how active it
00:57:14.079 --> 00:57:16.630
is. Is it a single star? Is it old
00:57:16.640 --> 00:57:19.750
enough? All these kind of factors. And
00:57:19.760 --> 00:57:21.589
then you can start looking at the
00:57:21.599 --> 00:57:23.270
planetary system that it's in. And
00:57:23.280 --> 00:57:24.950
there's a lot to talk about there, I
00:57:24.960 --> 00:57:25.670
think.
00:57:25.680 --> 00:57:30.470
>> Yes, absolutely. Uh and in our next um
00:57:30.480 --> 00:57:34.150
uh special um between Q&A episodes, we
00:57:34.160 --> 00:57:37.910
will um look more into um the the planet
00:57:37.920 --> 00:57:39.829
side of things. I I guess just to
00:57:39.839 --> 00:57:43.349
conclude um I'll throw one at you. Um
00:57:43.359 --> 00:57:45.190
and and this answer is always different
00:57:45.200 --> 00:57:47.750
depending on who you ask, but uh what do
00:57:47.760 --> 00:57:50.549
you think the odds are that we will find
00:57:50.559 --> 00:57:53.109
some form of life?
00:57:53.119 --> 00:57:56.309
>> Um I I'm an optimist. I think the answer
00:57:56.319 --> 00:57:58.230
to it will be yes, we will find some
00:57:58.240 --> 00:58:00.069
sort of life. I think the harder
00:58:00.079 --> 00:58:04.549
question is when. Now, if we find life
00:58:04.559 --> 00:58:06.150
in a million years time when we're not
00:58:06.160 --> 00:58:07.430
even human anymore, but we've hung
00:58:07.440 --> 00:58:09.510
around, we've managed to survive. That's
00:58:09.520 --> 00:58:10.950
not very edifying for me and you cuz
00:58:10.960 --> 00:58:13.030
it's a long time to wait. But as I said
00:58:13.040 --> 00:58:14.230
earlier on, I don't think it's a
00:58:14.240 --> 00:58:15.990
question of if, it's a question of when.
00:58:16.000 --> 00:58:19.670
Because I find it vanishingly improbable
00:58:19.680 --> 00:58:23.349
for us to be the only system with life.
00:58:23.359 --> 00:58:24.630
>> And it's a numbers game for me. You
00:58:24.640 --> 00:58:26.309
know, we've got a galaxy with between
00:58:26.319 --> 00:58:30.549
200 and 400,000 million stars. There are
00:58:30.559 --> 00:58:33.190
more galaxies in the visible universe
00:58:33.200 --> 00:58:35.589
certainly than there are planets in our
00:58:35.599 --> 00:58:37.670
galaxy. probably more than there are
00:58:37.680 --> 00:58:39.829
grains of sand in our galaxy. All of
00:58:39.839 --> 00:58:41.109
them with hundreds of thousands of
00:58:41.119 --> 00:58:43.430
millions of stars.
00:58:43.440 --> 00:58:45.349
To say that out of if you run the
00:58:45.359 --> 00:58:47.670
numbers you get sectillions,
00:58:47.680 --> 00:58:50.309
septillions, even octillions
00:58:50.319 --> 00:58:54.230
bonkersly full-on numbers of planets out
00:58:54.240 --> 00:58:56.309
there that were the only place that got
00:58:56.319 --> 00:58:58.309
life. That tells you that life is
00:58:58.319 --> 00:58:59.750
effectively impossible and we're a
00:58:59.760 --> 00:59:00.950
fluke.
00:59:00.960 --> 00:59:04.230
>> Now, that could be the case. If that's
00:59:04.240 --> 00:59:05.589
the case, what we've got here on Earth
00:59:05.599 --> 00:59:07.910
becomes even more precious and there is
00:59:07.920 --> 00:59:10.950
an even greater incentive for us to keep
00:59:10.960 --> 00:59:13.190
an eye on what we're doing so that Earth
00:59:13.200 --> 00:59:14.789
is still capable of hosting life in the
00:59:14.799 --> 00:59:17.589
future. But I think in reality, life
00:59:17.599 --> 00:59:19.030
will actually be more common than that.
00:59:19.040 --> 00:59:20.390
And you don't need to be much more
00:59:20.400 --> 00:59:22.870
common than that for life to be abundant
00:59:22.880 --> 00:59:25.750
in the galaxy. Let's imagine that life
00:59:25.760 --> 00:59:29.589
is found on one planet in 1 billion.
00:59:29.599 --> 00:59:31.109
That's billion with a B. So one in a
00:59:31.119 --> 00:59:33.510
thousand million. Now, we're finding
00:59:33.520 --> 00:59:35.670
that on average all stars have planets,
00:59:35.680 --> 00:59:37.270
probably have a number of planets. So,
00:59:37.280 --> 00:59:39.030
if we say roughly there are 10 planets
00:59:39.040 --> 00:59:41.030
per star, there will be four trillion
00:59:41.040 --> 00:59:43.750
planets in our galaxy. If one in a
00:59:43.760 --> 00:59:46.710
billion had life on it, that would mean
00:59:46.720 --> 00:59:49.030
there were 4,000 inhabited planets in
00:59:49.040 --> 00:59:50.870
our galaxy.
00:59:50.880 --> 00:59:52.549
>> Not a big number. The nearest one would
00:59:52.559 --> 00:59:54.069
be so far away in that case, we wouldn't
00:59:54.079 --> 00:59:56.710
find life for a long time. But life
00:59:56.720 --> 00:59:58.710
could be common and we still wouldn't
00:59:58.720 --> 01:00:00.390
find it. The more you increase that
01:00:00.400 --> 01:00:03.349
likelihood of life, the nearer the
01:00:03.359 --> 01:00:05.109
nearest examples will be and the sooner
01:00:05.119 --> 01:00:06.390
we'll find it. And that's why I think
01:00:06.400 --> 01:00:08.950
proximity will tell us a lot about the
01:00:08.960 --> 01:00:12.470
probability of life in that if we find
01:00:12.480 --> 01:00:15.510
life, the next step is to figure out we
01:00:15.520 --> 01:00:17.109
are not alone. We know we're not alone.
01:00:17.119 --> 01:00:19.670
How common is life? Now the other thing
01:00:19.680 --> 01:00:21.270
I think factors into it I think is a
01:00:21.280 --> 01:00:23.670
lovely kind of sci-fi thing to discuss
01:00:23.680 --> 01:00:24.870
all the way through you mentioned early
01:00:24.880 --> 01:00:27.430
on carbon based life and technologically
01:00:27.440 --> 01:00:30.230
advanced life and we drifted away the
01:00:30.240 --> 01:00:33.030
one place where I think that life that
01:00:33.040 --> 01:00:34.870
is different to us is something we could
01:00:34.880 --> 01:00:38.789
possibly find is siliconbased life now
01:00:38.799 --> 01:00:41.510
the reason for that is not from the
01:00:41.520 --> 01:00:45.510
point of view of um silicon people who
01:00:45.520 --> 01:00:48.069
have evolved in the way we have done I'm
01:00:48.079 --> 01:00:50.150
thinking more kind of second generation
01:00:50.160 --> 01:00:52.390
life. Now, our exploration of the solar
01:00:52.400 --> 01:00:54.789
system is done by our robot envoys and
01:00:54.799 --> 01:00:56.549
we're sending them near enough to home
01:00:56.559 --> 01:00:58.710
that we can tell them what to do.
01:00:58.720 --> 01:01:01.349
>> But we are developing to certain
01:01:01.359 --> 01:01:02.870
controversy at the current time. We're
01:01:02.880 --> 01:01:04.630
developing a greater and greater ability
01:01:04.640 --> 01:01:06.309
to develop things that can make
01:01:06.319 --> 01:01:07.910
decisions for themselves without human
01:01:07.920 --> 01:01:11.030
input. Things like AI and other systems.
01:01:11.040 --> 01:01:12.710
And if we get to the point where we want
01:01:12.720 --> 01:01:16.470
to explore around other stars, we'll
01:01:16.480 --> 01:01:18.069
need to develop spacecraft that have
01:01:18.079 --> 01:01:19.510
enough autonomy to make their own
01:01:19.520 --> 01:01:22.069
decisions. You go back to the idea, and
01:01:22.079 --> 01:01:23.190
I don't know what's happened to it in
01:01:23.200 --> 01:01:24.470
recent years, but the idea of project
01:01:24.480 --> 01:01:25.829
star where they made a little
01:01:25.839 --> 01:01:27.670
spacecraft, shot them off with laser,
01:01:27.680 --> 01:01:29.670
then they got to Proxima Centuri in 25
01:01:29.680 --> 01:01:31.829
years traveling at a fifth of the speed
01:01:31.839 --> 01:01:35.109
of light. You do that, they get to
01:01:35.119 --> 01:01:36.630
Proxima Centuri. If they've got to ask
01:01:36.640 --> 01:01:38.710
us what to do, they send a signal to us.
01:01:38.720 --> 01:01:40.710
takes 4 and a bit years to get here.
01:01:40.720 --> 01:01:42.230
Takes five years to get back and by the
01:01:42.240 --> 01:01:43.510
time it reaches them, they're a light
01:01:43.520 --> 01:01:44.789
year beyond the system. It's that well
01:01:44.799 --> 01:01:46.789
too late. So, we have to give them a
01:01:46.799 --> 01:01:48.549
certain level of autonomy. And the more
01:01:48.559 --> 01:01:49.910
complex their mission is going to be,
01:01:49.920 --> 01:01:52.390
the more autonomous it have to be. Which
01:01:52.400 --> 01:01:54.630
leads to the very science fiction idea
01:01:54.640 --> 01:01:57.190
that when we move out beyond the solar
01:01:57.200 --> 01:01:58.870
system, if we move out beyond the solar
01:01:58.880 --> 01:02:02.549
system, we will be preceded by a wave of
01:02:02.559 --> 01:02:06.150
life that is not us. That is our life
01:02:06.160 --> 01:02:08.230
that has a creator. that creator is
01:02:08.240 --> 01:02:10.470
humanity that is silicant based life
01:02:10.480 --> 01:02:11.990
that we send out whether they're
01:02:12.000 --> 01:02:14.390
vonoyman machines whether they are
01:02:14.400 --> 01:02:16.309
incredibly advanced AI machines without
01:02:16.319 --> 01:02:19.109
the capacity to reproduce themselves we
01:02:19.119 --> 01:02:22.710
will send out artificially
01:02:22.720 --> 01:02:25.589
built silicon life forms and again
01:02:25.599 --> 01:02:28.390
there's a a lovely fairly low stakes
01:02:28.400 --> 01:02:31.190
sci-fi series called the Bobbyverse
01:02:31.200 --> 01:02:33.349
um which follows that kind of idea in
01:02:33.359 --> 01:02:36.710
terms of future earth well guy in the
01:02:36.720 --> 01:02:38.789
current day dies but has in invested in
01:02:38.799 --> 01:02:41.430
cryogenics and his head is frozen and he
01:02:41.440 --> 01:02:43.750
wakes up and he's essentially put into a
01:02:43.760 --> 01:02:46.390
van machine and shot out into the stars
01:02:46.400 --> 01:02:47.990
and that that's a really interesting one
01:02:48.000 --> 01:02:49.589
because it's silicon based life that is
01:02:49.599 --> 01:02:51.349
also human. I mean figure that one out
01:02:51.359 --> 01:02:53.030
but it's good fun
01:02:53.040 --> 01:02:54.950
>> following again that very dangerous
01:02:54.960 --> 01:02:57.190
assumption that other life would follow
01:02:57.200 --> 01:02:58.870
the same pathway we follow and it seems
01:02:58.880 --> 01:03:00.549
like we are going down this AI and
01:03:00.559 --> 01:03:02.789
increasing complexity and increasing
01:03:02.799 --> 01:03:05.510
autonomy route. You then argue that
01:03:05.520 --> 01:03:07.990
other species sending out craft into the
01:03:08.000 --> 01:03:11.349
galaxy would send out autonomous
01:03:11.359 --> 01:03:14.710
intelligent silicon machines before they
01:03:14.720 --> 01:03:17.510
send themselves out. And therefore, you
01:03:17.520 --> 01:03:18.870
know, I'd think we're more likely if
01:03:18.880 --> 01:03:20.710
we're ever to bump into aliens to run
01:03:20.720 --> 01:03:22.390
into one of these probes or one of these
01:03:22.400 --> 01:03:24.069
machines rather than the aliens
01:03:24.079 --> 01:03:25.510
themselves. So I think there is a very
01:03:25.520 --> 01:03:27.589
real chance that if we find intelligent
01:03:27.599 --> 01:03:29.829
advanced life it could be siliconbased
01:03:29.839 --> 01:03:31.750
rather than carbon based but it's
01:03:31.760 --> 01:03:33.750
siliconbased life that was created by
01:03:33.760 --> 01:03:37.109
carbon based life which I mean leads to
01:03:37.119 --> 01:03:38.309
really interesting questions about
01:03:38.319 --> 01:03:40.069
philosophy and religion and all those
01:03:40.079 --> 01:03:42.150
kind of things which are not my forte
01:03:42.160 --> 01:03:44.069
but you know it does ask in interesting
01:03:44.079 --> 01:03:46.470
questions about origin and creation when
01:03:46.480 --> 01:03:47.829
you think about it from the context of
01:03:47.839 --> 01:03:49.190
that which is one of the things that's
01:03:49.200 --> 01:03:51.190
driven like I say a lot of wonderful and
01:03:51.200 --> 01:03:52.870
wonderfully entertaining sci-fi over the
01:03:52.880 --> 01:03:55.829
years. Yeah. Yeah. Look, as you said
01:03:55.839 --> 01:03:57.109
earlier, we could we could talk about
01:03:57.119 --> 01:04:01.349
this for a week, but we can't. Um, but
01:04:01.359 --> 01:04:03.670
uh I do uh want to direct people to your
01:04:03.680 --> 01:04:06.230
paper if uh people are interested in
01:04:06.240 --> 01:04:10.390
reading your paper from 2010. Uh it's uh
01:04:10.400 --> 01:04:12.950
called determining habitability, which
01:04:12.960 --> 01:04:15.990
exo earths should we search for life?
01:04:16.000 --> 01:04:18.309
And you can find it on the archive
01:04:18.319 --> 01:04:20.150
website. Is that right, Johnny?
01:04:20.160 --> 01:04:21.430
>> Yeah. So that was published in the
01:04:21.440 --> 01:04:23.190
international journal of astrobiology in
01:04:23.200 --> 01:04:24.710
2010. So the ones who want the kind of
01:04:24.720 --> 01:04:26.390
scientific reference it's international
01:04:26.400 --> 01:04:29.349
journal of astrobiology volume 9 page
01:04:29.359 --> 01:04:32.710
273 onwards. But um if you find it on
01:04:32.720 --> 01:04:34.870
NASA ads it'll give you the archive link
01:04:34.880 --> 01:04:37.190
which is the preprint version which
01:04:37.200 --> 01:04:39.670
basically means it's in my formatting
01:04:39.680 --> 01:04:41.589
rather than journal formatting. And this
01:04:41.599 --> 01:04:44.390
is it's actually a handier aside that
01:04:44.400 --> 01:04:47.430
I'm sure has been mentioned before. The
01:04:47.440 --> 01:04:51.270
way that a lot of science works has led
01:04:51.280 --> 01:04:53.109
to the creation of the most profitable
01:04:53.119 --> 01:04:57.109
and um and problematic um companies in
01:04:57.119 --> 01:04:58.230
the world which are the publishing
01:04:58.240 --> 01:05:00.390
companies. And so the way a scientist
01:05:00.400 --> 01:05:02.470
works is we do all this work da da da da
01:05:02.480 --> 01:05:04.470
hooray hoay huray. We then write a paper
01:05:04.480 --> 01:05:06.309
to tell the world about it. We send that
01:05:06.319 --> 01:05:08.549
off to a journal who gets another
01:05:08.559 --> 01:05:10.390
scientist to volunteer their time unpaid
01:05:10.400 --> 01:05:12.150
for free to referee it.
01:05:12.160 --> 01:05:13.029
>> Y
01:05:13.039 --> 01:05:15.190
>> then they charge typically the scientist
01:05:15.200 --> 01:05:16.630
who's written that paper money to
01:05:16.640 --> 01:05:18.710
publish that paper for them and then
01:05:18.720 --> 01:05:20.150
charge everybody for the privilege of
01:05:20.160 --> 01:05:22.789
reading it. So if I want the journal if
01:05:22.799 --> 01:05:24.150
I want to read the journal versions of
01:05:24.160 --> 01:05:26.789
my papers fortunately universities have
01:05:26.799 --> 01:05:28.630
paid access to a lot of journals but I'm
01:05:28.640 --> 01:05:31.349
fundamentally paying to read my own work
01:05:31.359 --> 01:05:35.589
and this is not ideal. I think partly
01:05:35.599 --> 01:05:36.789
because as a scientist, you know, I'm
01:05:36.799 --> 01:05:38.870
paid by taxpayers money. People are
01:05:38.880 --> 01:05:41.589
paying me to do this work. To me, it is
01:05:41.599 --> 01:05:42.870
really important that they know what
01:05:42.880 --> 01:05:44.150
we're doing. They know what they're
01:05:44.160 --> 01:05:45.990
getting for their money. And part of
01:05:46.000 --> 01:05:47.589
that is be a science communicator. And I
01:05:47.599 --> 01:05:49.109
encourage any scientists or budding
01:05:49.119 --> 01:05:51.029
scientists, don't just focus on the
01:05:51.039 --> 01:05:52.630
science. Focus on communication as well.
01:05:52.640 --> 01:05:53.829
Because if you do science, but can't
01:05:53.839 --> 01:05:55.190
communicate it, no one will know what
01:05:55.200 --> 01:05:58.470
you've done. But to get around that,
01:05:58.480 --> 01:06:00.950
what we do in astronomy and what many
01:06:00.960 --> 01:06:03.990
disciplines do is that we put preprints
01:06:04.000 --> 01:06:06.789
up on a publicly accessible free place.
01:06:06.799 --> 01:06:08.470
And it's in astronomy, it's just
01:06:08.480 --> 01:06:10.630
accepted that with very rare exceptions,
01:06:10.640 --> 01:06:12.710
journals will let you do this. So when
01:06:12.720 --> 01:06:15.349
we get our paper and we've written it,
01:06:15.359 --> 01:06:17.349
some disciplines in astronomy will put
01:06:17.359 --> 01:06:18.870
the paper up on the archive when it's
01:06:18.880 --> 01:06:21.270
submitted. Some will wait until it's
01:06:21.280 --> 01:06:22.470
accepted by the journal, when it's
01:06:22.480 --> 01:06:24.150
refereed. I've always waited till
01:06:24.160 --> 01:06:25.750
acceptance, but occasionally if you've
01:06:25.760 --> 01:06:27.109
made a big discovery, you want to stop
01:06:27.119 --> 01:06:29.190
somebody scooping you. You put it up at
01:06:29.200 --> 01:06:31.029
submission. There's a growing effort by
01:06:31.039 --> 01:06:32.630
scientists to put it up at submission to
01:06:32.640 --> 01:06:34.230
actively solicit feedback from the
01:06:34.240 --> 01:06:35.750
community to improve the work, which is
01:06:35.760 --> 01:06:38.789
good. But those papers go up on archive,
01:06:38.799 --> 01:06:40.789
a rxiv.
01:06:40.799 --> 01:06:41.109
>> Yeah.
01:06:41.119 --> 01:06:44.309
>> Um, be very careful. There is another
01:06:44.319 --> 01:06:46.150
platform out there where the letters in
01:06:46.160 --> 01:06:48.630
archive are shifted around which is
01:06:48.640 --> 01:06:51.349
where a community of people who espouse
01:06:51.359 --> 01:06:52.789
ideas that are not scientifically
01:06:52.799 --> 01:06:55.349
verifiable will put their work and
01:06:55.359 --> 01:06:56.789
publish their own little papers. It's a
01:06:56.799 --> 01:06:59.190
different thing but archive is a
01:06:59.200 --> 01:07:01.910
repository of freeto view things. So if
01:07:01.920 --> 01:07:04.710
you are searching for papers NASA's ads
01:07:04.720 --> 01:07:06.870
system is wonderful. When you click on a
01:07:06.880 --> 01:07:09.190
given paper in there, most of them, but
01:07:09.200 --> 01:07:10.710
not all of them, will have a line that
01:07:10.720 --> 01:07:12.950
says journal version or ads version, but
01:07:12.960 --> 01:07:14.069
there'll also be a line that says
01:07:14.079 --> 01:07:15.829
preprint. And if you click on the
01:07:15.839 --> 01:07:17.349
pre-print links, it will take you to the
01:07:17.359 --> 01:07:19.510
archive and allow you to read the paper
01:07:19.520 --> 01:07:21.750
for free. Just to be aware that that is
01:07:21.760 --> 01:07:24.549
a version some of the time before
01:07:24.559 --> 01:07:25.990
refereeing, most of the time after
01:07:26.000 --> 01:07:27.750
refereeing, but before publishing and
01:07:27.760 --> 01:07:29.990
edits effectively. So, the link you've
01:07:30.000 --> 01:07:32.150
got to that is the pre-print version of
01:07:32.160 --> 01:07:34.309
that paper. The other caution I give to
01:07:34.319 --> 01:07:36.789
people is that it is 16 years old. So
01:07:36.799 --> 01:07:38.870
all of the areas I talk about in it have
01:07:38.880 --> 01:07:41.109
moved on. We've learned more. We can
01:07:41.119 --> 01:07:42.630
talk a bit more about it next time as
01:07:42.640 --> 01:07:44.789
well. But always when you read things be
01:07:44.799 --> 01:07:47.029
conscious of the fact that science is
01:07:47.039 --> 01:07:49.029
fluid. Science changes. Our knowledge
01:07:49.039 --> 01:07:50.950
changes. I see just in the news
01:07:50.960 --> 01:07:54.630
recently, Jayen Isaac Isacson, who's I
01:07:54.640 --> 01:07:56.069
think the head guy at NASA at the
01:07:56.079 --> 01:07:57.510
minute, who's a wealthy
01:07:57.520 --> 01:08:00.230
multi-billionaire type guy, um is
01:08:00.240 --> 01:08:01.750
arguing that the US is wanting to
01:08:01.760 --> 01:08:03.750
strongly build a scientific case why
01:08:03.760 --> 01:08:05.349
Pluto should be restored as a planet
01:08:05.359 --> 01:08:07.349
because fundamentally we discovered it
01:08:07.359 --> 01:08:09.109
so it should still be a planet and Clyde
01:08:09.119 --> 01:08:12.789
Tombbo would be turning in his grave.
01:08:12.799 --> 01:08:15.990
That is what it is. But it's um it is
01:08:16.000 --> 01:08:18.870
important to keep in mind that science
01:08:18.880 --> 01:08:21.030
is fluid. It moves. Whereas once
01:08:21.040 --> 01:08:23.669
something is published that's static.
01:08:23.679 --> 01:08:26.070
>> It's a window on our knowledge at a time
01:08:26.080 --> 01:08:28.950
rather than necessarily the modern
01:08:28.960 --> 01:08:30.470
version. If I were to rewrite that paper
01:08:30.480 --> 01:08:33.030
now there'd be advances.
01:08:33.040 --> 01:08:36.870
>> Of course. Absolutely. But um yes um I
01:08:36.880 --> 01:08:38.149
think we're trying to arrange to put the
01:08:38.159 --> 01:08:39.910
link on the show notes. I'll just have
01:08:39.920 --> 01:08:42.550
to remind Hugh about that. We might wrap
01:08:42.560 --> 01:08:44.390
it up there. Jonty. fascinating topic
01:08:44.400 --> 01:08:46.470
and uh it's one we get a heck of a lot
01:08:46.480 --> 01:08:48.709
of questions about. So, um yeah,
01:08:48.719 --> 01:08:50.390
hopefully there's a bit of information
01:08:50.400 --> 01:08:53.349
in there to uh keep people's minds
01:08:53.359 --> 01:08:55.990
worring. Johnny, thanks very much. We
01:08:56.000 --> 01:08:57.990
will uh see you again real soon. It's an
01:08:58.000 --> 01:08:59.189
absolute pleasure. Thank you for having
01:08:59.199 --> 01:09:00.070
me.
01:09:00.080 --> 01:09:01.749
>> Professor Johnny her, professor of
01:09:01.759 --> 01:09:03.349
astrophysics at the University of
01:09:03.359 --> 01:09:05.349
Southern Queensland, standing in for
01:09:05.359 --> 01:09:07.829
Fred Watson. And thanks to Hugh in the
01:09:07.839 --> 01:09:09.349
studio. Uh Hugh couldn't be with us
01:09:09.359 --> 01:09:12.870
today. Um he got a bit confused. We we
01:09:12.880 --> 01:09:15.590
know of one planet where there is life.
01:09:15.600 --> 01:09:17.510
Hugh thought we meant that he was the
01:09:17.520 --> 01:09:19.669
only life form on the planet, so he
01:09:19.679 --> 01:09:21.829
didn't see any need to turn up today.
01:09:21.839 --> 01:09:23.430
And from me, Andrew Dunley, thanks for
01:09:23.440 --> 01:09:25.030
your company. We'll see you on the next
01:09:25.040 --> 01:09:27.189
episode of Space Nuts. Bye-bye.
01:09:27.199 --> 01:09:28.149
>> Space Nuts.
01:09:28.159 --> 01:09:30.309
>> You've been listening to the Space Nuts
01:09:30.319 --> 01:09:32.550
podcast
01:09:32.560 --> 01:09:35.510
>> available at Apple Podcasts, Spotify,
01:09:35.520 --> 01:09:38.149
iHeart Radio, or your favorite podcast
01:09:38.159 --> 01:09:40.550
player. You can also stream on demand at
01:09:40.560 --> 01:09:43.430
byes.com. This has been another quality
01:09:43.440 --> 01:09:47.960
podcast production from byes.com.