Legacy in Limbo: The Duality of 'Oh, Canada'
In this thought-provoking episode of *Movies First*, the team delves into Paul Schrader's latest film, *O Canada*, a complex exploration of mortality and truth that intertwines the talents of Richard Gere and Jacob Elordi. The film's unique structure...
In this thought-provoking episode of *Movies First*, the team delves into Paul Schrader's latest film, *O Canada*, a complex exploration of mortality and truth that intertwines the talents of Richard Gere and Jacob Elordi. The film's unique structure features a documentary filmmaker, Leonard Fife, portrayed by Gere, who unravels his life’s secrets on his deathbed, all while his wife, played by Uma Thurman, bears witness to the confessions that reveal a lifetime of lies and betrayals.
Listeners will be captivated by the film's ambitious technical choices, including the use of multiple aspect ratios and a blend of black and white with color, designed to enhance the storytelling. However, the hosts discuss how these artistic flourishes may overshadow the emotional core of the narrative, leaving audiences grappling with the weight of Fife's confessions amidst a flurry of stylistic distractions.
The episode also examines the film's deeper themes, such as the moral implications of Fife's revelations, from draft dodging during the Vietnam War to infidelity and the impact of his choices on those he loves. While the narrative is rich with potential for reflection, the discussion highlights the film's tendency to interrupt itself with mundane scenes that diminish the gravity of its revelations.
Scoring a moderate 6.5 out of 10, *O Canada* is portrayed as a film that, despite its flaws, prompts meaningful conversations about truth, legacy, and the burdens we leave behind. With intriguing casting choices and a meta-narrative that challenges viewers, this episode invites you to ponder whether the film succeeds as a viewing experience or serves better as a topic of discussion.
**Highlights:**
- **Complex Confessions:** Fife's confessions reveal deep moral dilemmas and personal failures.
- **Technical Ambition:** The use of different aspect ratios and visual styles aims to enhance storytelling but may detract from emotional impact.
- **Thought-Provoking Themes:** The film raises questions about honesty, legacy, and the consequences of revealing uncomfortable truths.
Join us for a compelling discussion on *O Canada*, a film that challenges the boundaries of narrative and invites audiences to reflect on the nature of truth and redemption. For more film reviews and discussions, subscribe to *Movies First* on your favorite podcast platform!
https://www.bitesz.com/podcast/movies-first
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/movies-first--2648009/support.
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:04,400
Deathbed confessions usually come in whispers, but in Paul Schrader's new film,
2
00:00:04,400 --> 00:00:07,840
they're captured in four different aspect ratios with two different actors
3
00:00:07,840 --> 00:00:11,920
playing the same tormented soul. Now that's what I call going out with a bang.
4
00:00:11,920 --> 00:00:17,120
Five, four, three, two, one.
5
00:00:17,120 --> 00:00:20,400
Here music. This is Movies First.
6
00:00:20,400 --> 00:00:23,360
You know what's fascinating about this approach?
7
00:00:23,360 --> 00:00:28,720
It's like watching someone deliberately demolish their own legacy in real time.
8
00:00:28,720 --> 00:00:32,000
With Richard Gear and Jacob Allordy tag-teaming the destruction.
9
00:00:32,000 --> 00:00:38,000
Well, speaking of destruction, this reunion between Schrader and Gear
10
00:00:38,000 --> 00:00:43,840
took 45 years to happen. Their last collaboration was American Jigalo in 1980.
11
00:00:43,840 --> 00:00:49,680
And instead of glamour, they're diving deep into the murky waters of mortality and truth?
12
00:00:49,680 --> 00:00:56,400
It's quite the departure from their previous work. The story structure here is particularly bold.
13
00:00:56,400 --> 00:01:00,800
A documentary filmmaker being documented while he essentially confesses his sins.
14
00:01:00,800 --> 00:01:06,480
That's what makes it so meta, right? Here's Leonard Fife, played by Gear,
15
00:01:06,480 --> 00:01:10,160
who spent decades getting others to spill their secrets,
16
00:01:10,160 --> 00:01:12,160
and now he's turning the tables on himself.
17
00:01:12,160 --> 00:01:19,360
But, and here's where it gets really interesting. He insists his wife of 30 years
18
00:01:19,360 --> 00:01:21,520
has to be there for every revelation.
19
00:01:21,520 --> 00:01:23,440
Oh, that's just brutal.
20
00:01:24,480 --> 00:01:29,440
Uma Thurman plays the wife, Emma, and she has to sit there while her dying husband reveals he's
21
00:01:29,440 --> 00:01:34,800
been lying to her for their entire relationship. Like, who does that to someone they love?
22
00:01:34,800 --> 00:01:40,240
You know what's really fascinating about this whole project? It actually emerged from real life
23
00:01:40,240 --> 00:01:46,560
tragedy. Schrader's friend, author Russell Banks, was ill when he wrote the book This Is Based On.
24
00:01:46,560 --> 00:01:50,240
He wanted to call it Canada, but couldn't because another book had that title.
25
00:01:50,960 --> 00:01:57,360
So now we've got, oh, Canada instead. The technical choices are pretty ambitious too,
26
00:01:57,360 --> 00:02:02,000
using different aspect ratios for different time periods, mixing black and white with color.
27
00:02:02,000 --> 00:02:07,600
But from what we're hearing, these artistic flourishes might be getting in the way of the story.
28
00:02:07,600 --> 00:02:12,720
Right, it's like they're so focused on the presentation that they sometimes lose sight of
29
00:02:12,720 --> 00:02:17,120
the emotional core. And then there's this really strange choice where they occasionally
30
00:02:17,120 --> 00:02:22,640
insert gear into scenes with his younger self played by a Lordy. It's jarring and pulls you right out
31
00:02:22,640 --> 00:02:28,160
of the narrative. Well, that makes me wonder, what's the point of all these technical gymnastics if
32
00:02:28,160 --> 00:02:34,160
they're not serving the story? Like, we've got this powerful narrative about truth and redemption,
33
00:02:34,160 --> 00:02:40,240
but it's getting buried under all these stylistic choices. Exactly. And let's talk about what's
34
00:02:40,240 --> 00:02:46,000
actually being confessed here. We're dealing with draft dodging during Vietnam, abandon children,
35
00:02:46,000 --> 00:02:52,240
multiple affairs. It's heavy stuff. But instead of letting these revelations land with their full weight,
36
00:02:52,240 --> 00:02:58,640
the film keeps interrupting itself with scenes of fight, going to the bathroom or falling asleep.
37
00:02:58,640 --> 00:03:04,320
That's such a missed opportunity. These are the kind of revelations that could really make us think
38
00:03:04,320 --> 00:03:11,280
about how we all construct our personal narratives. You know? And here's what I find really compelling.
39
00:03:11,280 --> 00:03:16,560
This idea that fight is choosing to unveil all this on his deathbed. It's like he's ensuring he
40
00:03:16,560 --> 00:03:21,600
won't have to deal with the fallout. But everyone else will be left caring these uncomfortable truths.
41
00:03:21,600 --> 00:03:28,000
So in a way, even his final act of supposed honesty might actually be another form of manipulation?
42
00:03:28,000 --> 00:03:34,400
Precisely. And that's what makes this film so frustrating. It's got all these fascinating layers
43
00:03:34,400 --> 00:03:40,160
to explore, but it keeps getting in its own way. The six and a half out of ten rating feels like it's
44
00:03:40,160 --> 00:03:45,760
reflecting that tension between ambition and execution. Though I have to say, the casting choices are
45
00:03:45,760 --> 00:03:51,280
intriguing. Elordie apparently brings this likeability to young five that helps us understand how
46
00:03:51,280 --> 00:03:56,640
he could have gotten away with so much for so long. You know what this reminds me of? It's like when
47
00:03:56,640 --> 00:04:01,520
someone decides to clear their conscience, but they do it in a way that ensures everyone else has
48
00:04:01,520 --> 00:04:07,600
to carry the burden of their truth long after they're gone. The film might be messy, but maybe that
49
00:04:07,600 --> 00:04:12,000
messiness reflects something authentic about how we deal with truth and mortality.
50
00:04:12,000 --> 00:04:16,880
That's a really generous way of looking at it, though I wonder if audiences will be quite so
51
00:04:16,880 --> 00:04:20,960
forgiving when they're trying to follow all these narrative threads and aspect ratio changes?
52
00:04:20,960 --> 00:04:28,000
Well, maybe that's the ultimate irony. A film about a documentary filmmaker that might actually work
53
00:04:28,000 --> 00:04:35,120
better as a topic of discussion than as a viewing experience. Sometimes the conversation about art
54
00:04:35,120 --> 00:04:40,080
can be more revealing than the art itself. You're being listening to movies first.
55
00:04:40,080 --> 00:04:46,720
Available at Apple Podcasts. Spotify. I have radio. All your favorite podcast player. You can
56
00:04:46,720 --> 00:04:55,120
also stream on demand at bytes.com. This has been another quantity podcast production from sites.com.
