Film & Whiskey
Film & Whiskey
Film & Whiskey: The Ultimate Whiskey and Movie Review Podcast
Lifelong friends Brad and Bob combine their love for movies and whiskey in this hilarious and insightful show. Each episode pairs a classic film with a new whiskey review, offering fresh takes for cinephiles, whiskey lovers, and fans of movie reviews alike.

Whether you’re a seasoned whiskey drinker or just starting out, Film & Whiskey delivers expert analysis, witty banter, and plenty of laughs. Subscribe now for your go-to whiskey and movie review podcast that’s perfect for fans of great movies, good drinks, and better conversations.
Oct. 20, 2022

Top Fives: Making a Movie Dream Team

Top Fives: Making a Movie Dream Team
Top Fives: Making a Movie Dream Team
Film & Whiskey
Top Fives: Making a Movie Dream Team

Bob and Brad do a draft of five people needed to make a classic movie. Each host picks one actor, director, writer, cinematographer, and composer to form the best possible crew. Who will emerge with the better team?

Meanwhile, they revisit two brands, each offering a new expression: Catoctin Creek and their Ragnarok Rye, and Still Austin with a new cask strength edition.

Film & Whiskey Podcast. New episodes every Monday.

Theme music: "New Shoes" by Blue Wednesday

--- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/filmwhiskey/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/filmwhiskey/support

0:00 Hey everybody. Welcome into the film and whiskey podcast. I'm Bob book, I'm Brad G. And today we're coming at you with another special bonus. Episode bonus episode where resurrecting a bonus episode format that we have not done in a while Brad. Yeah, it's our top 5 series but a little bit different. Take on the top 5 series. Bob, we're putting a Twist on it. Yeah, you know, it's the time of year where everyone's getting into their fantasy football draft. Pretty soon. It's going to be the filmin. Whiskey fantasy basketball draft again. And so, we kind of figured, let's find a way to work a draft theme into our top five.

0:41 And I really like the the format that you came up with Brad, why don't you explain it to the listeners? Yeah, so, I was honestly thinking about just doing a bonus episode talking about like, if we could make a movie, what kind of movie would we make? And that time that kind of took me down the thought train of like, well, I think I'd want to make like a Arc action thriller type a type of movie and I started to wonder, like, well, who would I want to make that movie? Because, you know, obviously I would be directing it and I would have it be my breakout film and I'd win an oscar. But if I wasn't able to direct it, who would I have directed and who would write it? And who would, you know, work on the cinematography in the music and who'd be the lead actor and I was like, oh my gosh, we have a bonus episode.

1:27 Well, and the way that it worked out is Oh, and the way that it worked out is we're going to give you a top five as in the top five rolls. I don't know, I'll try to bring me. Try to break it down. Yeah, break it down, for me box. I'm having a hard time here. Yeah. So what we're going to do today is we're basically going to have a draft of five categories and it's essentially like, what would your top five? I don't know. Dream Team to work on a movie of your choosing be. We're assuming that Brad and I are high-powered. Word Hollywood producers that we have our pick of the litter, of the best of the best of directing, and writing, and cinematography, and acting, and scoring the movie. And we can pick one person to fit each role. And the other person cannot pick that person anymore. And so, it's kind of a draft.

2:17 We're going to be allowed to go in any order so you can take your director first. I could take a cinematographer first, you know, we can strategically try to anticipate where the other person's going and pick somebody to kind of block them from. Forming a better movie than my studio is forming. Hmm. Whatwhat's, your studio called Bob, I was trying to think of a clever name over here. I got nothing man. I think it's kind of along the lines of like a 24. Uh-huh, I'm going to go for G10. Oh nice. I'm gonna go with viscosity pictures, whoo-hoo. Let's go, man. So you have it, this is what we're going to do today. I'm really excited for it. We've never done anything in a draft format before.

2:58 I'm not Eric Lee known for being a great Fantasy Football, Draft Ur. So this might end up going really badly for me, we will see you make up for it in fantasy basketball. That I sure do, man, I researched the hell out of that document. So you do a couple more ground rules we can only pick people who are alive and currently working. So, no one in that is announced, you know, a retirement for making movies and because of that, it has to be a movie that could plausibly get made. So I'm pretty pumped while Doing it. We're going to sip on two Whiskey's, the first of, which is from Catoctin Creek distillers in Virginia. It's their Ragnarok Rye, which it's just one of the coolest looking bottles.

3:40 I think I've ever seen Brad. Yeah, hands down. It is just a wildly awesome bottle. I, it came in the mail and I opened it. And I literally just like dropped an expletive like, oh my gosh, like, this is one of the coolest bottles I've ever seen. And then the Second one, we're going to be revisiting still Austin which is one of our favorite Brands that's come out in the last couple years. Obviously out of Texas. The first time we had them was way back when we first had our friend Scott sour on the show to break down. I think the mint julep that might have been the episode that we did this with and it was a, it was a whiskey that I think was like, 94. Ich proof may have been up to 100, but it was still at like, cocktail proof.

4:24 And it was one of those where we're like, hey if you really want to elevate, whatever cocktail you're making use, Is whiskey, but also you're not going to want to use the whiskey because it drinks. So beautifully neat. They've sent us their Cask strength expression and I am really excited to try this one. You're not going to want to keep the whiskey in there, Bob, because it drinks. Good neat. Is that what I said? Yep, I think you want to drop the mixer. Actually know what I was saying was we don't want to use it for cocktails because because it drinks so good on its own like why? Yes. Yes. You know I'm saying? Yeah I do. Well Bob do you want to draft this like like a snake draft where the first person picks first and then the next person gets the next two picks.

5:14 Do you just want to go back and forth? How do you want to roll this? Let's go back and forth and I'll let you go first. That's how much I care about you and how much confidence I have in my own abilities. I was thinking that we could flip the coin and Destiny but if you want to let me go first. It's up to you man. Oh man it was your idea I am a man of honor and I respect the fact that you put this whole thing together so you go first. Alright so once again our five categories are director actor or actress cinematographer composer and writer. So Brad where do you want to start? I am going to with the first pick in the film and whiskey draft of 2022. I am going to pick Roger deakins cinematography Bastard. All right, I knew out of my whole list. I was like this is the person that Bob will take first, man. All right, Deacon's is off the board that was like, that was Ace in the Hole man.

6:15 He makes everything better. I was going to say, I think primarily for like sicarios influence, but also, like, I don't know everything. He makes 1917 Fargo Skyfall. Make the dude is just a true living legend in the world of cinematography. Absolutely, I guess I kind of mentioned it in my mind, I'm building like a dark action thriller, what kind of movie do you feel like you're building for Bob? I honestly have no idea. I think that I would, I would get to crushed when, like, if I went into it thinking. Oh, I'm gonna do, you know, like a, like a family drama, like marriage storm cam?

6:55 Yeah, whatever. And then, those people started getting picked off by you. I would get more pissed off, so I think I'm just going to go with God. I would like, Nora Ephron to write my dark action thriller. So I think I'm gonna just go with like best available person and at the end be like, you know what, they're all so talented, they can think of something to make a movie about whom? All right, well, your first pick is up, Bob where are you going? I'm going to start with the writer and I'm going to take someone who was like eighth or ninth down my list. But I think again, I'm going to I'm just going for like most Talented person. And I'm taking a writer who's also a director, but I would rather have them writing than I would directing for this exercise.

7:38 And that is Paul Thomas Anderson who he was on my list, too. Man, I'm going to take him because if you look at the screenplays for his movies, I mean from Boogie Nights 2, There Will Be Blood to licorice pizza last year, he can work in almost any genre and I think he's so good at finding little moments for each character to Their inner desires in ways that don't come across as forced that don't come across as hammy. I'm really excited to see what Paul Thomas Anderson's going to concoct here, but that's my first pick. Yeah, I think that's a really great first pick Bob. I know that you've been raving over licorice pizza for a while now. So love that movie.

8:20 That's a good one man. With the second pick, I think. Well, my pick for writer is safe now, so I can I can hold back on that. I think I'm going to go with director and mmm. I'm I'm really struggling between the two. I think I'm gonna go with David Fincher. Mmm, nice. I just, I still haven't seen the Zodiac, but from what I know about it that fits with, what I think I'm going for the dude who made Fight Club, and seven, and The Social Network. I Just feel like you pair him up with deacons and they're just going to make some phenomenal work.

9:00 So I yeah. I think that I think that Fincher's my guy, I really like the way he draws out you know really like deep inner narratives that are going on in his characters lives and yet still pushes the movie forward in a very kinetic way. And I think that that would be a really really good pairing with deacons have they worked together on a movie Before deacons and Fincher. I don't believe they have deacons his stuck, too. I mean, he's worked all over the place with a ton of different directors, but I don't believe he's worked with Fincher. Well. Now he will, we need to remedy that. Yeah. All right. Time for our our time for my second pick, and then we'll go ahead and break for our first whiskey. I'm going to stick with kind of like the below-the-line people here.

9:47 I'm gonna go with composure and I'm gonna go with Nicholas brittle who did the score for. If Beale Street could talk a score that I've talked about a lot on this podcast, actually. Since we watched that movie, it's been used a lot lately in like Instagram, reels and Tick-Tock. And it's really funny because when, you know, like what movie it's from, it's like, wow, that really doesn't go with your stupid. Tick-Tock of you baking, a loaf of bread, but it's such a beautiful heart wrenching score, and I just love the way bertel uses the piano uses the strings. I really think we could get something really, really cool out of the combination of a PTA. Script and a Nicholas Patel score. Yeah, that's awesome.

10:28 Dude, I love it, man. Let's, let's get into this Ragnarok. I'm really excited for for this whiskey. Yeah. So again, this is from Catoctin Creek. Now we had one of their rise on the show, a little over a year ago now, Brad and we were not big fans of it. And the reason behind that is that it has the craft whiskey notes all over it, on the nose. And I know that, like a lot of people describe the Aft whiskey Funk as being kind of like a wet cardboard. Like, there's just this note that hangs around in young craft whiskey and it's hard to explain but it's always on Catoctin Creek products, and it specifically, the one we had last year, we did not really like it all. And so, we got this one in the mail, and it's a collaboration with the metal band guar and it is covered in, you know, images of them looking Like what?

11:25 I don't know what you call it, like, the Banshees, yes, Nordic Nordic demonic forces. There it is. It has this awesome metallic stopper on the top of it, you know, of course, they wrote some really cool copy. You can read all about it on their website for our purposes. What we want to know is this it is a 94, proof Rye aged in new White Oak, and then in Sugar, Maple and cherry wood. And is it? I said, 94 proof. It's 92. Proof. It is not age stated. So No idea how old it actually is, but I'm assuming older than three years old Brad. Let's give it a nose in a taste. I know you've tried it already. I'm actually diving in live on air. So why don't you give us your notes?

12:05 Yeah, I think that this one has that same Funk. Bob, it's got it. Like the minute. I put it up to my nose. I was like, oh yeah, that's Catoctin Creek. Yeah it's kind of like a strong. There's almost a bit of a strong Cherry. Dark fruit. Kind of Nokia on for me. Yeah. And a little bit of vanilla underneath. I don't know, man, that the nose feels a little bit smoother than last time, but there's still some of that same stuff going on. Yeah, it's really hard to describe it, but it smells familiar and I don't know how to explain that. I know that I'm going to be bad Whiskey's. We've had before, I have talked about this, this cleaning product called tarnex, and it kind of has a little bit of that on it. It has a little bit of like, cardboard to it, but then it also smells a lot, like butterscotch. And it's like, You could combine functions like smeared butterscotch topping on wet cardboard, and that doesn't sound appealing and I'm not sure it is appealing, but it's the closest I can get to being accurate here, it does smell like a freshly cut red.

13:09 Apple a little bit to me underneath all that. And you're right, there's some vanilla here as well. It all mingles together to make a really unique nose. I just don't know where this is going from here. Yeah, it's a really interesting knows that's about the best way to put it. Let's give it a sip though. Bob Mm-hmm. Oh, that's really nice. Yeah, it definitely still taste a little bit young. It's not a super well-rounded whiskey. Like, it's got some pepper to it. It's got some heat and, like, some bite to it, really? Hmm. I wouldn't say that it covers the tongue a lot either, like it's just 92. Both in. Yeah, 92 proof is maybe not where this should be. I think it should be up in like the 102 104 proof. However, this is like a significant step up from that last Catoctin Creek, we had.

13:57 Yeah, yeah. The little bit of a funk comes through, but I don't know how to describe it other than to say, the original Catoctin creatures. Had a lot of rough edges that are not present on this one. I don't know if they had aged it a little bit longer, but it definitely comes across as a more complete experience. And there's just more flavor going on and the the funk that was there before is present, but not overpowering. And I actually kind of like it in this expression of Contacting Creek. Yeah, for me I think the Finish is where this really shines because you swallow it. And it's like, okay, that was a nice young rye and then a layer kind of came back up on my palate after I let it sit for a second and that it tasted like I had drank an older Rye, like it had a nice Dusty quality to it.

14:50 There was some nice fruit notes that came out on the end. There is interesting like the tasting experience was like, okay young Rye probably needs another two years to be like superb and then afterwards It was like, here's what this could be. I don't know if that makes sense, but it was like, look, it was like a glimpse into the future of this Rye, if they kept it in the barrel for like another three years. Maybe. Yeah. And I agree with you. I think you add 10 proof points to this. Jump it up just above 100 and you're looking at a whiskey, that really has a lot of legs to it that. Yeah, but overall, man, this is a really, really pleasant experience. I like it a lot. Yeah, I think if we were scoring this out of 50 again, not really Factory. In the price right now.

15:32 But just for the sake of argument, I'd probably put this Somewhere In Like A don't know, 32 to 35 range but you're right if it was a little bit heavier on the alcohol content and just a little bit longer age, I think this could be like a 40 or above. It's really on the right track. Yeah, 100%. I think I'd be a little above you, 34 to 37 area but yeah, this is a improvement over the first offering and Again, we've talked a lot of times about cool packaging with subpar interior contents. This is not that this is one of the coolest bottles I have ever seen in my life, paired with a really solid whiskey inside.

16:15 So, if you're able to get your hands on some Ragnarok, I think I'd suggested Bob. Yeah, me too man. And I would also suggest diving back into this draft because it's your turn to pick your third member of your dream team. Yeah. So I've got myself a director. And a cinematographer, I think. Well, I'll just go into the, I'm just going to keep this is draft strategy. Bob, I'm going to keep going into places. You haven't been and there's only one actor that I can choose. I think you might be able to pick him for me, Bob, but we're talking Tom Cruise, baby. I think just I am just utterly convinced that Tom Cruise is one of our greatest living Get Treasures of an actor and he deserves an Oscar and I want him to get it in this movie because I think he is has so much more depth to his acting.

17:11 The people give them credit for. And this is it, man, this is this is the time, maybe it's maybe it's a dark Thriller that is about him as an aging, you know, policeman or a detective or something. I don't know. I'm just I'm here for it. And I think that Tom Cruise deserves a really Ali serious role for him to win an Oscar. I love it, man. All right, I think it's time for me to choose a director and I'm down to three people on my list because I keep thinking of this Nicholas brutal score and the sort of aching you know if Beale Street could talk themes here, Barry Jenkins is still on my list.

17:52 I could snatch him up right now. I think he would make a beautiful movie with Paul, Thomas Anderson writing. I've got Spielberg on here because he Spielberg and he's also no. Lutely capable of this kind of movie. I mean, he has a film coming out this fall called The fabled Men's, which is basically an autobiography of his own life. He's done this kind of stuff before, he knows how to do the traumatized kid or shattered relationship. Very, very well. Now, not-not-not Spielberg, the other person that I'm going back and forth with is Alfonso cuaron. I think that he's super ambitious, but he also really understands Children of Men is such a beautiful movie.

18:32 But could I see cuarón directing a PTA script? I think is the thing that's like throwing me off here. I think I'm gonna go Spielberg, although I want to go Jenkins, but I'm gonna go Spielberg as my director because you just, you can't go wrong man. Dude, Paul Thomas Anderson, and Spielberg working together on a movie would just be absolutely epic. All right, man. Number four, You what are you gonna do? Number four for me, I think I'm going to go into the composer realm and I'm going to pick Johan Johansen of arrival, Fame, arrival sicario. I think that he just has a real talent for honestly. It's what you were saying about.

19:25 Nicholas Patel was got me in this direction was. Yeah, there's something about a mournful full backdrop for a for any movie, you know, drama that you you film, that just sets the stage for where you want to go emotionally. And I think that you'll Hanson would do a really beautiful job at that, for the movie. I'm envisioning. I'm going to hold off on my actor, because I have a list of five people right now, and I'm like, this is too many people can't claim them all. So, I'm gonna go cinematographer and I'm realizing as I go through these lists, that what I'm doing is I'm basically Picking directors through their collaborators. So like I picked brutal because he works with Jenkins. And I picked PTA because he works with PTA and I'm gonna pick Rodrigo Prieto as my cinematographer. We've talked about him a couple times on this show. He did the cinematography for silence, which we just did a few weeks ago, he's been working more and more with Scorsese and just doing these beautiful movies. He can also go really Hollywood with his, with his compositions, like he did the movie Argo.

20:31 Go, which looked really great. But it was like your standard, you know, kind of political thriller. He also did the cinematography for Brokeback Mountain, which is one of the most, beautiful looking movies. I think we've ever done on this show. So yeah, I'm gonna go create so he's like, he kind of flies under the radar. A little bit. I was thinking about, you know, like a loop pesky who did Birdman and the Revenant, but I don't know that I want a camera 3 inches from my actors faces throughout the whole movie, so I'm gonna which actor. Yeah exactly. So I'm going to take Prieto. Get ya, dude. What do you want to jump into this still Austin or do you want to make our final picks? Let's let's play out the suspense because I think we both still have to pick our acting performances, right? No, I chose Tom Cruise.

21:13 Oh, that's right. You did choose Tommy C. So who's left for you? What's your my writer? Your writer and I have an actor. Yeah, let's break and let's try this still Austin. What do you say? All right yeah, let's get to it man. Alright so we are trying still Austin, Cask strength bourbon whiskey this clocks in at 118. Proof. It is aged for at least two years. This was something we noticed with the original still Austin as well. I think that one was called the musician. It says two years right on the bottle and we kept looking at the bottle going like, how is this? Only two years old? Mmm, as we saw two years and we were like gosh are we gonna have to like find nice things to say about the two year old whisky? And it did not drink like a two year old whisky at all.

21:54 This is a 70% non-GMO, corn, 25% rye and 5% malted barley. Ash Bill, where you had they specified non-GMO, man, they specified everything 25% elbon Rye. I don't even know what that means. 5% Wildfire malted barley. So why didn't you say so before? Well, that's probably why the MSRP on this is sixty five dollars for a bottle. So I think I will factor that in a little bit as we get into our tasting and scoring here. Brad, I'm pouring it out right now. Why don't you tell me what you think of it? Yeah, I honestly The nose is a little bit lacking, like there's some nice stuff going on, but I'm not getting enough.

22:38 Nice stuff. There's a little bit of orange there, some caramel and vanilla come across. It's got your classic bourbon notes, but I'm not getting a lot of complexity. I think that's the issue I'm having right now. I don't know. Bob, where are you at with the, with the nose so far? I'm in a really different spot than you Brad. And I think it's, because if there's a word I could use to describe this, it's just dark. Like, it smells like you squirted, like, pancake syrup into a glass. It's really, really dark. It's really decadent lots of maple. Lots of brown sugar, almost molasses like, just straight molasses on this. I was going to say, molasses is the right word.

23:19 It doesn't quite have the for me. It doesn't quite have. The decadence of like, a sweet maple syrup, but yeah, molasses really yeah, that's it. Ma'am. I think as it kind of airs out Little bit in my glass here. It's starting to open up a little bit. Those dark dark notes are dissipating, and it becomes a lot more Okie. A little bit more Dusty as well, which is not something. I was expecting on a two year old whisky again, like it. When you factor in the, this is only two years old. There's quite a bit of complexity. I think Brad because it doesn't smell like a young whiskey. No, it really doesn't that there are some really nice things going on here. I think if I'm being honest Bob, I might have just filled my glass a little too full.

24:00 I'm used to having These tiny little samples to pour out of in this time I have a whole 750 ml so might not have been enough room when I get into the taste here. I think the thing that stands out to me is like right on the back end of the palate. It gets kind of like herbal and vegetable which I wasn't expecting it has that sort of like craft Rye thing we get sometimes like on the bell for Rye. I keep making this this comparison to like me pulling weeds out in the yard and like that weird chlorophyll. Smell you get from pulling certain weeds. It's like it's like that on my palette and that wasn't present at all on the nose. So I'm a little bit surprised at the fact that this doesn't have the really like brown sugar maple heavy taste, that the smell would have suggested. Yeah, it has a little bit of molasses Upfront for me, but I would agree it almost turns into a baking spice vegetal Just really fascinating mixture of of experiences. Like this isn't a very typical bourbon there, there's a little bit of vanilla there for me, but it's not overpowering. When I get in the finish, it turns a little okey on me, but not bitter.

25:18 Some continuing orange notes that I got from the, from the start, this is a really interesting whiskey Bob. Now again, it's 118 proof. I don't think that it Really suggest that on the palate. Like it's definitely a higher proof whiskey but it doesn't hit you the way you would expect 118 to hit you and I'll give it that much as for that note that I don't particularly like that sort of like earthy we d-type note, I don't know if aging this longer would kind of mellow that out a little bit, but I will say that at 2 years old. I think the most apparent thing about it is like the nose is there. The Taste is not quite there yet. If this was four years old, I think it'd be a lot more well-rounded.

25:58 It. Yeah, I think that a little bit more age here. Would definitely make it worth the ticket price, man. I tried this a few week or so ago and I really enjoyed it but this time through there's there's a few more gaps in it than I thought there would be and it might be the barley that's in here as well. But again and only 5%, I can't imagine it being that big of a deal. Brad. I like this a lot but I think if I'm being honest, I I liked the non Barrel proof version of still Austin. Just a little bit better than this. Yeah I think I'm with you man but I think still Austin is making some crazy good whiskey here. I did too man they're like oh they're on a great trajectory and I think that, you know, their stuff is not going to be two years old forever and when it becomes 4 years old and it becomes six and eight years old, it's going to be spectacular stuff. Like I cannot wait to see what keeps coming out of there. Yeah.

26:50 Really some some of the better better things on the market that I can imagine. I really like what still Austin is doing here. All right man, we have one. More pick a piece, you're going first. And you've got to do a writer correct. That is correct, Bob, I think to round it out. I would like to choose the Coen Brothers, as my writer nice as it as a team. The only stipulation. And, you know, we'd have to hammer this out in the contractual. You know, negotiations. I would want it because you said this very early on about the Coen brothers and I think you're right. That it feels like every other movie, that they make together is either super nihilistic and has somewhat of a pointless ending Allah, No Country for Old Men, and then other ones have to say it one more time. No, Country for Old Men, no country. Every time you say it, it sounds like you're referring to the actor, Gary Oldman.

27:54 No country told you don't separate the two words. Old Mary Gary has no place here, No Country for Old Men, it out. So I don't want a No Country for Gary Oldman script, but I do want a Fargo typescript. Something that has like a weirdly uplifting ending. Something that has a little bit of purpose to it, and when they do that, I think they are some of the best script writers I've ever ever seen. So I for what I'm shooting for, in this movie, I want the Coen Brothers. Mmm. It sounds like what? I am setting up for is a movie about someone dealing with like some crushing emotional weight.

28:36 Because I've gotten Spielberg and PTA and ratelle and Prieto. And so that's kind of helped me narrow down my actor list from 5 to 4. So I'm really really honing in here. Brad, you're killing it, man. The first person I had on my list was Denzel because he's Denzel and it's hard to choose against Denzel, but I think I'm going to and it's because I think that the Movie that I'm creating here needs someone who can walk the streets alone at night and be sad and and I miss making day. Yeah, no no. But like make you feel the weight and it's not the Denzel can't do that but it's been a while since he's done a role that feels really like interior. You know what I mean? Like I don't know if you saw him in fences which he also directed a great movie.

29:21 So good. Great movie really showy performance and he just did Macbeth with Joel Coen. Or was it Ethan Coen? I can't remember at the moment, but great, great movie sholay performance, it's Macbeth. So, I'm going to take Denzel out of the running for now and your guy had three, I had two male actors besides Denzel that I was thinking of, and one was Jake Gyllenhaal who I have season tickets to, like, I will go see anything. He's in, he was fantastic in a movie that I keep talking about. Michael Bay's, ambulance, completely unhinged. Never heard of it. He was really doing. Doing like a Nicholas Cage thing in that movie and I love it. But but but because of that, I'm taking him out of the running as well. And that leaves me with two people, one of whom is Andrew Garfield.

30:06 Who is becoming an actor that I really, really love. He was in, I think three different movies last year, very different performances in all three but he's really good at that sort of like sensitive. You know, emotional hurt performance. I think he did great here. The other one is an actress. Who's really? Come on strong, the last five or so years. Coleman. Who's nominated are who won? The Oscar for the favorite? Who's been nominated in many movies since then? Just a year or two ago? She was in the father with Anthony Hopkins, man. Great movie. I can't decide who to pick here, man. Coleman Coleman is like you can do no wrong and I think she's the obvious choice actually.

30:47 But it's also like when we put our lists up on social media and people see my list, they're going to be like, who are half of these people, whereas like Andrew Garfield People Like Us Spider-Man. Like, I know him. You know so be honest with you man. Go ahead. Just I don't like Andrew Garfield a ton. I think really kind of I think he's kind of whiny. Hmm. I haven't seen Tick Tick. Boom. Yeah you should watch that. He that was he has completely changed my opinion of him over the last two years or so. Okay, he played Jim Baker in the eyes of Tammy Faye last year and he was great in that movie too. Yeah, I'm just a big fan. Yeah, no, I'm open to having my opinion changed. I just feel like I didn't I never watched it because I was like, refusing on principle, but I just heard bad things about the The Amazing Spider-Man and I didn't care for him in silence a ton and I don't know, he just always strikes me as a as the Exemplar of like the whiny early twenty year old and that maybe that's just my that's just my issues.

31:53 It's probably not even his own well I think because of that, you've helped sway me. Towards Olivia Colman. I'm going to choose her as my leading actress in this movie. So here's my rundown, man. I've got a movie starring Olivia. Colman directed by Steven Spielberg with a script from Paul Thomas Anderson cinematography, is being done by Rodrigo Prieto and is being scored by Nicholas brittle and that movie is called Oscar bait TM. Now, what's yours directing my movie is Is David Fincher which will be written by the Coen Brothers. Deacons Roger deakins will be doing the cinematography. Johan Johansen will be composing. The music and Tom Cruise will be keeping you at the edge of your seats.

32:44 I feel like if you had a real movie set with Tom Cruise and David Fincher on it, to people who are notorious perfectionist so that it would just like the sheer battle of wills. On that yet. Would just cause like, an atomic explosion. Unless they were together on the vision. It if they agreed on the vision, I think that it could be one of the most beautiful collaborations in cinematic history, and you know what, even if they don't, and it is an atomic explosion from the dust of that atomic explosion, you would get an awesome shot of Tom Cruise running. Yes, he would just emerges out if the mushroom cloud in full Sprint, I mean, if Aaron Sorkin and David Fincher can collaborate, then I think we have a chance with taught with Tom Cruise.

33:35 Let's hope so. Alright, film and whiskey Nation. We'd love to hear from you. Who had the better draft, who has the better movie. You can let us know on our social media accounts, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram at film whiskey or if you want to talk with us about what your picks would be, who would you take as your top five? Obviously, you can't have any of the time people we picked but uh who Would you have in your, in your fantasy draft of people to create a movie? You can check out our Discord. There's a link to download it at the end of every single one of our show notes will be back on Monday with another regularly scheduled episode. But until then I'm Bob book, I'm Brad G and we'll see you next time.