June 11, 2025

Blake Lively vs. Justin Baldoni - The Allegations That Shook Hollywood Part 2 - "When Hollywood Lawyers Attack"

Show Notes
Transcript

What started as workplace harassment allegations exploded into six federal lawsuits, secret shell companies, and a legal war that consumed Hollywood. From demands for Blake Lively's therapy records to mysterious investigations and judicial gag orders, the Lively-Baldoni feud became a masterclass in weaponized litigation. Today's dismissal of Justin Baldoni's $400 million countersuit might seem like victory, but the real trial begins March 2026. This is the story of how two celebrities turned the federal court system into their personal battlefield—and why the legal system may be no match for modern celebrity warfare.

To become a premium subscriber (no ads and no feed drops) visit caloroga.com/plus. For Apple users, hit the banner on your Apple podcasts app which seays UNINTERRUPTED LISTENING. For Spotify or other players, visit caloroga.com/plus. You also get 25+ other shows on the network ad-free!

Join the Feuds Community!

Love drama? Obsessed with rivalries that shaped history? From Hollywood breakups to presidential vendettas, from rap battles to international Cold Wars, Feuds: Power, Pride, and Payback delivers the most explosive conflicts in culture, politics, and entertainment.

Join thousands of fellow drama enthusiasts dissecting every episode, sharing theories, and debating who really won these legendary battles. We're building the ultimate community for people who understand that the best stories are always about conflict.

Follow us on Facebook and Instagram—just search for "Feuds Podcast" or click the link in the show notes.

Because every great story needs people to tell it to.

WEBVTT

1
00:00:03.200 --> 00:00:13.759
Calaruga Shark Media. Welcome back to feuds, power, pride, and payback.

2
00:00:14.560 --> 00:00:19.559
I'm Marcus Reid. When we left Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni,

3
00:00:20.079 --> 00:00:24.719
their feud had exploded from workplace tensions into dueling federal

4
00:00:24.800 --> 00:00:29.480
lawsuits worth hundreds of millions of dollars. But what happened

5
00:00:29.519 --> 00:00:33.079
next would prove that sometimes the legal battle is more

6
00:00:33.119 --> 00:00:37.719
destructive than the original conflict. Over the past six months,

7
00:00:38.000 --> 00:00:42.520
what started as sexual harassment allegations has metastasized into a

8
00:00:42.640 --> 00:00:49.000
legal hydra, six separate lawsuits, multiple judges, pr firms suing

9
00:00:49.000 --> 00:00:52.280
each other, and a federal court system pushed to its

10
00:00:52.280 --> 00:00:56.600
breaking point by two Hollywood stars who refused to back down.

11
00:00:57.759 --> 00:01:01.719
This morning's dismissal of Baldoni's four hundred million dollar countersuit

12
00:01:02.159 --> 00:01:05.640
might seem like the end, but as we'll see, it's

13
00:01:05.760 --> 00:01:08.599
just the latest chapter in a legal war that has

14
00:01:08.719 --> 00:01:14.120
consumed careers, exposed the dark arts of celebrity reputation management,

15
00:01:14.799 --> 00:01:18.200
and turned a respected federal courthouse into the setting for

16
00:01:18.319 --> 00:01:24.439
Hollywood's most bitter grudge match. This is episode five. When

17
00:01:24.439 --> 00:01:33.599
Hollywood lawyers attack Act one, the legal hydra awakens. By

18
00:01:33.640 --> 00:01:37.519
February twenty twenty five, what had started as Blake Lively's

19
00:01:37.560 --> 00:01:42.239
sexual harassment complaint had spawned a legal ecosystem so complex

20
00:01:42.680 --> 00:01:46.760
it required flow charts to track. There was Lively's original

21
00:01:46.760 --> 00:01:52.079
federal lawsuit against Baldoni and Wayfarer Studios, Baldoni's four hundred

22
00:01:52.159 --> 00:01:56.959
million dollar countersuit against Lively, Ryan Reynolds and their publicist

23
00:01:57.280 --> 00:02:02.560
Leslie Sloane, Baldoni's operate two hundred fifty million dollar lawsuit

24
00:02:02.840 --> 00:02:06.640
against The New York Times, And then, in a twist

25
00:02:06.760 --> 00:02:10.759
that would make even seasoned Hollywood lawyer's head spin, came

26
00:02:10.800 --> 00:02:15.520
the revelation of the van Zan lawsuit. In April twenty

27
00:02:15.639 --> 00:02:19.479
twenty five, Baldoni's legal team uncovered what they called a

28
00:02:19.520 --> 00:02:24.000
smoking gun, a secret lawsuit filed in September twenty twenty,

29
00:02:24.039 --> 00:02:28.919
four months before Lively's public complaints by a mysterious Delaware

30
00:02:28.960 --> 00:02:34.240
company called van Zan. The target ten unnamed John Does,

31
00:02:34.680 --> 00:02:38.360
who had allegedly engaged in a smear campaign against an

32
00:02:38.479 --> 00:02:42.400
unnamed client. It turned out van Zan was a shell

33
00:02:42.439 --> 00:02:49.479
company controlled by Blake Lively herself. The lawsuit was filed

34
00:02:49.520 --> 00:02:53.680
the same day Baldoni's former publicist, Stephanie Jones warned a

35
00:02:53.719 --> 00:02:57.840
departing employee not to work for rival PR firm Abel

36
00:02:58.319 --> 00:03:03.719
because her business wouldn't be a round much longer. According

37
00:03:03.719 --> 00:03:07.319
to Baldoni's lawyers, this proved that Lively and Reynolds had

38
00:03:07.360 --> 00:03:11.319
been planning their attack for months, using legal subterfuge to

39
00:03:11.400 --> 00:03:15.680
gather intelligence on Baldoni's team while publicly maintaining that they

40
00:03:15.719 --> 00:03:21.759
were the victims of harassment. Brian Friedman, Baldoni's combative attorney,

41
00:03:21.800 --> 00:03:25.560
called it the Van Scham lawsuit, and accused Lively of

42
00:03:25.919 --> 00:03:31.360
engaging in their own smear campaign intentionally circumventing normal procedures

43
00:03:31.800 --> 00:03:36.360
for clearly improper purposes. But that was just the beginning

44
00:03:36.400 --> 00:03:39.479
of the legal chess match that would consume both sides

45
00:03:40.840 --> 00:03:48.360
act too, the medical records battle. In May twenty twenty five,

46
00:03:48.759 --> 00:03:51.759
the legal war took an even more personal turn when

47
00:03:51.800 --> 00:03:55.439
Baldoni's team made a move that would define the entire conflict.

48
00:03:56.199 --> 00:04:00.400
They demanded Blake Lively's medical and mental health records. The

49
00:04:00.479 --> 00:04:05.680
request stemmed from Lively's claims of intentional infliction of emotional distress,

50
00:04:06.439 --> 00:04:09.360
legal language that meant she was seeking damages for the

51
00:04:09.400 --> 00:04:14.520
psychological harm allegedly caused by Baldoni's behavior and the subsequent

52
00:04:14.560 --> 00:04:20.160
retaliation campaign. In civil lawsuits, when a plaintiff claims emotional

53
00:04:20.240 --> 00:04:23.680
or physical injury, the defense has the right to examine

54
00:04:23.720 --> 00:04:28.240
medical records to determine the extent and cause of that damage.

55
00:04:28.959 --> 00:04:32.800
Its standard procedure, but in this case it became a weapon.

56
00:04:33.680 --> 00:04:37.839
Baldoni's lawyers filed a motion demanding that Lively signed hyper

57
00:04:37.920 --> 00:04:42.759
releases giving them access to her therapy notes, psychiatric records,

58
00:04:43.000 --> 00:04:46.759
and any mental health treatment she'd received. They wanted to

59
00:04:46.839 --> 00:04:50.600
examine whether her alleged emotional distress was really caused by

60
00:04:50.600 --> 00:04:55.079
Baldoni's behavior, or whether it stemmed from other sources, like

61
00:04:55.120 --> 00:04:59.240
the public backlash to her promotional tour or other personal issues.

62
00:05:00.160 --> 00:05:04.399
For Lively, the demand represented the exact kind of retaliation

63
00:05:04.560 --> 00:05:08.240
she'd been complaining about all along. Here was a man

64
00:05:08.279 --> 00:05:12.560
she'd accused of sexual harassment now demanding access to her

65
00:05:12.600 --> 00:05:17.240
most private medical information, information that could be weaponized against

66
00:05:17.240 --> 00:05:20.800
her in the court of public opinion. The battle over

67
00:05:20.839 --> 00:05:24.199
the medical records became a proxy for the entire case.

68
00:05:25.279 --> 00:05:28.879
Was this a legitimate legal discovery request or was it

69
00:05:28.920 --> 00:05:34.360
harassment designed to pressure Lively into dropping her claims rather

70
00:05:34.399 --> 00:05:37.879
than turn over the records, Lively made a stunning decision

71
00:05:38.720 --> 00:05:45.720
she would abandon her emotional distress claims entirely. Act three.

72
00:05:45.839 --> 00:05:51.040
The judge, who'd had enough by this point, Federal Judge

73
00:05:51.079 --> 00:05:54.759
Lewis Lyman, brother of director Doug Lyman and a respected

74
00:05:54.839 --> 00:05:57.920
jurist in the Southern District of New York, was clearly

75
00:05:57.959 --> 00:06:02.120
losing patience with both sides. In a series of increasingly

76
00:06:02.199 --> 00:06:06.279
stern rulings, Judge Lyman made it clear that he viewed

77
00:06:06.279 --> 00:06:08.879
the case as exactly what he'd called it in March,

78
00:06:09.959 --> 00:06:14.120
essentially a feud between p R firms that was consuming

79
00:06:14.279 --> 00:06:18.759
valuable court resources with its endless motions and counter motions.

80
00:06:19.680 --> 00:06:24.000
When Lively tried to drop her emotional distress claims without prejudice,

81
00:06:24.000 --> 00:06:28.319
meaning she could potentially refile them later, Baldoni's team objected,

82
00:06:28.879 --> 00:06:33.319
demanding the dismissal be with prejudice, permanently barring her from

83
00:06:33.360 --> 00:06:39.560
bringing those claims again. Judge Lyman's response was swift and uncompromising.

84
00:06:40.160 --> 00:06:44.920
He denied both side's requests and issued an ultimatum, work

85
00:06:44.959 --> 00:06:48.240
it out among yourselves, or he would rule that if

86
00:06:48.279 --> 00:06:52.720
Lively didn't dismiss the claims, the court will preclude Lively

87
00:06:52.759 --> 00:06:57.800
from offering any evidence of emotional distress. It was judicial

88
00:06:57.839 --> 00:07:02.240
frustration and written form a federal judge, essentially telling two

89
00:07:02.319 --> 00:07:06.720
Hollywood stars and their expensive legal teams to stop wasting

90
00:07:06.759 --> 00:07:11.399
the court's time with procedural warfare. But Judge Lyman's most

91
00:07:11.519 --> 00:07:15.160
significant intervention came when he imposed what he called the

92
00:07:15.199 --> 00:07:19.920
Empire state rule on both parties. Neither side was allowed

93
00:07:19.959 --> 00:07:22.360
to make statements to the press that could influence a

94
00:07:22.360 --> 00:07:26.439
potential jury. The rule came after months of both sides

95
00:07:26.480 --> 00:07:30.000
litigating their case in the media as aggressively as they

96
00:07:30.000 --> 00:07:33.879
were fighting in court. The gag order was a recognition

97
00:07:34.000 --> 00:07:37.399
that this case had become as much about public opinion

98
00:07:37.800 --> 00:07:42.199
as legal facts, and that the constant media statements were

99
00:07:42.279 --> 00:07:56.279
threatening the integrity of the judicial process itself. Act for

100
00:07:57.279 --> 00:08:03.399
the secret investigation. In late January twenty twenty five, as

101
00:08:03.439 --> 00:08:07.920
the legal battle intensified, Wayfarers Studios announced they were conducting

102
00:08:07.920 --> 00:08:13.399
their own internal investigation into Lively's workplace harassment claims. It

103
00:08:13.480 --> 00:08:18.199
seemed like a reasonable response a company investigating allegations against

104
00:08:18.240 --> 00:08:23.959
its executives, but Lively's legal team immediately cried fowl, calling

105
00:08:24.000 --> 00:08:29.720
the investigation a disingenuous charade designed to gather ammunition for

106
00:08:29.800 --> 00:08:34.840
the legal battle rather than genuinely examine workplace conduct. The

107
00:08:34.879 --> 00:08:39.480
timing was certainly suspicious. Wayfarer waited until they were facing

108
00:08:39.559 --> 00:08:44.480
federal lawsuits to begin investigating allegations that dated back to

109
00:08:44.600 --> 00:08:50.159
early twenty twenty four. More tellingly, they claimed attorney client

110
00:08:50.279 --> 00:08:55.480
privilege over all the investigation materials, meaning Lively's team couldn't

111
00:08:55.519 --> 00:08:59.600
access the findings. In a scathing letter to Judge Lyman,

112
00:09:00.080 --> 00:09:05.320
Lively's lawyers wrote, does anyone believe that Wayfarer is genuinely

113
00:09:05.360 --> 00:09:10.559
investigating a film set workplace that no longer exists? Since

114
00:09:10.639 --> 00:09:15.600
Wayfarer is now suddenly interested in conducting a workplace investigation,

115
00:09:16.440 --> 00:09:19.440
here's a reminder of some of the things Mislively raised

116
00:09:19.519 --> 00:09:23.039
years ago during the filming of the movie. The letter

117
00:09:23.120 --> 00:09:28.440
detailed the specific incidents Lively had reported, Baldoni allegedly showing

118
00:09:28.559 --> 00:09:32.919
nude videos of women on set, discussions of pornography, addiction

119
00:09:33.039 --> 00:09:37.679
during work meetings, improvised intimate scenes without consent, and the

120
00:09:37.720 --> 00:09:43.840
constant violation of professional boundaries. But Wayfarer's investigation would remain secret,

121
00:09:44.320 --> 00:09:48.559
protected by legal privilege, adding another layer of frustration for

122
00:09:48.639 --> 00:09:56.200
Lively's team and the court system trying to resolve the dispute.

123
00:09:56.440 --> 00:10:04.600
Act five. The dismissal and what it means. Monday's ruling

124
00:10:04.639 --> 00:10:08.919
by Judge Lyman was comprehensive and devastating for Baldoni's legal strategy.

125
00:10:09.519 --> 00:10:12.360
In a one hundred thirty two page decision, the judge

126
00:10:12.360 --> 00:10:16.799
dismantled virtually every aspect of Baldoni's four hundred million dollar countersuit.

127
00:10:18.159 --> 00:10:21.840
On the defamation claims, Judge Lyman ruled that Baldoni's team

128
00:10:21.919 --> 00:10:25.960
had failed to prove that Lively, Reynolds, or their publicist

129
00:10:26.480 --> 00:10:31.120
had made false statements with actual malice, the high legal

130
00:10:31.159 --> 00:10:36.320
standard required when public figures sue for defamation. The Wayfarer

131
00:10:36.360 --> 00:10:40.360
parties have not alleged that Reynolds, Sloane or The Times

132
00:10:40.720 --> 00:10:44.320
would have seriously doubted these statements were true based on

133
00:10:44.399 --> 00:10:49.879
the information available to them, The judge wrote, essentially saying

134
00:10:50.200 --> 00:10:53.120
that even if the statements were wrong, there was no

135
00:10:53.200 --> 00:10:57.799
evidence they were made with malicious intent. On the extortion claims,

136
00:10:58.120 --> 00:11:02.240
Baldoni's allegation that Lively had threatened to make false accusations

137
00:11:02.600 --> 00:11:06.159
unless she got creative control of the film, the judge

138
00:11:06.200 --> 00:11:10.559
found insufficient evidence that any threats were made with criminal intent.

139
00:11:11.720 --> 00:11:15.919
Most significantly, the judge ruled that Lively's original complaint to

140
00:11:15.960 --> 00:11:20.759
the California Civil Rights Department was protected by legal privilege,

141
00:11:20.759 --> 00:11:24.200
meaning she couldn't be sued from making those allegations even

142
00:11:24.240 --> 00:11:29.080
if they were ultimately proven false. Lively's lawyers immediately declared

143
00:11:29.519 --> 00:11:33.879
total victory and complete vindication, while announcing they would now

144
00:11:33.919 --> 00:11:39.080
seek attorney's fees, treble damages, and punitive damages against Baldoni

145
00:11:39.159 --> 00:11:43.799
and Wayfarer. But the dismissal comes with a caveat. Judge

146
00:11:43.879 --> 00:11:47.720
Lyman gave Baldoni until June twenty third to file an

147
00:11:47.759 --> 00:11:52.360
amended complaint, potentially allowing him to try again with different

148
00:11:52.440 --> 00:12:05.840
legal theories. ACT six. The human cost. Beyond the legal

149
00:12:05.879 --> 00:12:10.600
maneuvering and procedural battles, this case has exacted a devastating

150
00:12:10.679 --> 00:12:15.399
human toll on everyone involved. Sources close to Baldoni tell

151
00:12:15.399 --> 00:12:19.200
People Magazine that he's feeling the financial and emotional weight

152
00:12:19.279 --> 00:12:23.240
of his legal fight, though they insist he remains confident

153
00:12:23.279 --> 00:12:26.399
in his legal team and believes things will work out

154
00:12:26.480 --> 00:12:31.960
for the best. His career, however, is effectively over dropped

155
00:12:31.960 --> 00:12:36.559
by WME, stripped of awards and blacklisted by an industry

156
00:12:36.600 --> 00:12:41.720
that has zero tolerance for sexual harassment allegations. Baldoni faces

157
00:12:41.759 --> 00:12:45.600
a future where even winning his legal battles might not

158
00:12:45.679 --> 00:12:53.039
restore his professional reputation. Lively, despite today's legal victory, continues

159
00:12:53.080 --> 00:12:58.440
to face online harassment campaigns. Every public appearance is scrutinized,

160
00:12:58.919 --> 00:13:03.799
every social media post dissected by armies of commenters whose

161
00:13:03.919 --> 00:13:07.639
organic outrage may or may not be manufactured by the

162
00:13:07.720 --> 00:13:14.039
same digital manipulation techniques that started this entire war. Ryan Reynolds,

163
00:13:14.279 --> 00:13:18.080
drawn into the battle as both husband and alleged co conspirator,

164
00:13:18.600 --> 00:13:22.240
has seen his own carefully crafted public image tarnished by

165
00:13:22.279 --> 00:13:28.080
association with what Baldoni's lawyers call an extortion scheme. Even

166
00:13:28.120 --> 00:13:33.720
the peripheral players have suffered. Stephanie Jones, Baldoni's former publicist,

167
00:13:34.360 --> 00:13:38.159
faces her own legal battles after being accused of leaking

168
00:13:38.279 --> 00:13:44.559
confidential information. Leslie Sloane, Lively's publicist is fighting to be

169
00:13:44.639 --> 00:13:49.120
removed from the various lawsuits entirely. The New York Times,

170
00:13:49.519 --> 00:13:54.200
one of America's most respected news organizations, has spent months

171
00:13:54.240 --> 00:14:05.120
defending its journalistic integrity against accusations of bias and malprac epilogue,

172
00:14:05.879 --> 00:14:11.039
the trial that's still coming. Today's dismissal might seem like

173
00:14:11.039 --> 00:14:14.360
the end of the Blake Lively Justin Baldoni saga, but

174
00:14:14.480 --> 00:14:17.399
it's actually just the clearing of legal underbrush before the

175
00:14:17.440 --> 00:14:23.159
main event. Lively's original lawsuit, the sexual harassment and retaliation

176
00:14:23.360 --> 00:14:27.519
claims that started this entire war, is still moving toward trial.

177
00:14:28.559 --> 00:14:31.960
That case is scheduled to begin on March ninth, twenty

178
00:14:32.039 --> 00:14:36.000
twenty six, in the same federal courthouse where Sean diddy

179
00:14:36.120 --> 00:14:40.360
Comb's is currently facing his own legal reckoning. The trial

180
00:14:40.399 --> 00:14:43.279
will force both sides to present their evidence in public

181
00:14:43.879 --> 00:14:47.279
under oath, with none of the procedural maneuvering that has

182
00:14:47.399 --> 00:14:53.039
characterized the legal battle so far. Witnesses will testify, documents

183
00:14:53.039 --> 00:14:57.080
will be examined, and ultimately a jury will decide whose

184
00:14:57.159 --> 00:15:01.519
version of events they believe. But perhaps more importantly, the

185
00:15:01.600 --> 00:15:03.840
trial will serve as a test case for the me

186
00:15:03.919 --> 00:15:09.039
too era's most complex questions. How do we distinguish between

187
00:15:09.159 --> 00:15:14.840
legitimate harassment complaints and weaponized accusations? What happens when the

188
00:15:14.879 --> 00:15:19.240
tools designed to protect victims are allegedly used as weapons

189
00:15:19.600 --> 00:15:23.600
by the powerful, and in an industry built on image

190
00:15:23.639 --> 00:15:28.360
and perception, is the truth even discoverable when both sides

191
00:15:28.639 --> 00:15:33.360
have access to the most sophisticated reputation management techniques money

192
00:15:33.360 --> 00:15:38.279
can buy. The legal system, designed to resolve disputes through

193
00:15:38.279 --> 00:15:42.159
evidence and argument, has proven inadequate to handle a conflict

194
00:15:42.559 --> 00:15:45.399
that exists as much in the realm of public perception

195
00:15:45.879 --> 00:15:53.720
as legal fact. Social media campaigns, manufactured outrage, coordinated press strategies.

196
00:15:54.279 --> 00:15:58.279
These are the weapons of modern celebrity warfare, and traditional

197
00:15:58.320 --> 00:16:02.440
courts are struggling to as adapt. What we've witnessed over

198
00:16:02.440 --> 00:16:06.159
the past six months isn't just the destruction of two careers,

199
00:16:06.639 --> 00:16:10.840
or even the exposure of Hollywood's toxic workplace culture. It's

200
00:16:10.840 --> 00:16:14.080
a preview of how all public disputes will be fought

201
00:16:14.440 --> 00:16:18.320
in an era where the line between authentic, grassroots opinion

202
00:16:18.600 --> 00:16:24.879
and professional manipulation has disappeared entirely. The case may be dismissed,

203
00:16:25.320 --> 00:16:29.240
but the precedent it sets for how celebrities attack each other,

204
00:16:29.720 --> 00:16:33.919
how the legal system handles manufactured controversies, and how the

205
00:16:33.919 --> 00:16:38.360
public consumes and processes These narratives will echo through every

206
00:16:38.399 --> 00:16:42.639
future feud between powerful people. Because in the end, this

207
00:16:42.840 --> 00:16:45.240
was never really about what happened on a movie set

208
00:16:45.279 --> 00:16:49.039
in New Jersey. It was about power, who has it,

209
00:16:49.559 --> 00:16:52.559
how they use it, and what happens when the weapons

210
00:16:52.559 --> 00:16:56.399
they deploy against each other end up destroying everything in

211
00:16:56.440 --> 00:17:02.679
their path. The real trial begins next March, but the

212
00:17:02.799 --> 00:17:05.839
verdict on what this case means for Hollywood, for the

213
00:17:05.920 --> 00:17:09.359
Me Too movement, and for the future of celebrity culture

214
00:17:09.720 --> 00:17:16.079
is still being written. I'm Marcus Reed. Thanks for listening

215
00:17:16.079 --> 00:17:18.680
to feuds, power, pride and payback.