WEBVTT
1
00:00:03.200 --> 00:00:13.400
Callaroga Shark Media. This is Eastwood reloaded. We followed Clint
2
00:00:13.439 --> 00:00:17.760
Eastwood through six decades of filmmaking, from Western icon to
3
00:00:17.879 --> 00:00:22.399
contemporary filmmaker, from action star to artists, exploring the deepest
4
00:00:22.480 --> 00:00:25.879
questions about human nature. Now we need to talk about
5
00:00:25.879 --> 00:00:28.839
a film that brought his screen career full circle while
6
00:00:28.879 --> 00:00:32.159
examining what happens when success comes at the cost of
7
00:00:32.240 --> 00:00:36.799
everything that makes life meaningful. Eastwood at eighty eight playing
8
00:00:36.880 --> 00:00:40.159
Earl Stone, a ninety year old Korean War veteran who
9
00:00:40.159 --> 00:00:44.079
becomes a drug courier for a Mexican cartel. A film
10
00:00:44.119 --> 00:00:48.200
about aging family and the consequences of a lifetime spent
11
00:00:48.240 --> 00:00:53.039
prioritizing workover relationships. The movie that used everything audiences knew
12
00:00:53.079 --> 00:00:56.439
about Clint Eastwood to tell a story about American masculinity,
13
00:00:56.799 --> 00:01:02.439
economic desperation, and the price of independence. This is Episode ten,
14
00:01:03.119 --> 00:01:09.599
twenty eighteen, The Mule. It was based on a true story,
15
00:01:09.959 --> 00:01:14.239
but it was also deeply personal Eastwood examining his own
16
00:01:14.319 --> 00:01:17.040
life through the character of a man who achieved professional
17
00:01:17.079 --> 00:01:20.560
success while failing at their relationships that should have mattered most.
18
00:01:21.079 --> 00:01:24.799
Here's the setup. Earl Stone is a prize winning horticulturist
19
00:01:25.000 --> 00:01:28.640
whose day lily farm is failing. He's facing foreclosure, his
20
00:01:28.719 --> 00:01:31.640
wife is divorcing him, his daughter won't speak to him,
21
00:01:31.959 --> 00:01:35.879
and his granddaughter is getting married without inviting him. At ninety,
22
00:01:36.040 --> 00:01:39.239
Earl discovers that a lifetime of putting work before family
23
00:01:39.319 --> 00:01:44.000
has left him with professional accomplishments but personal isolation. When
24
00:01:44.000 --> 00:01:47.239
a cartel recruits him to transport drugs across the country,
25
00:01:47.599 --> 00:01:51.159
Earl sees an opportunity to solve his financial problems while
26
00:01:51.200 --> 00:01:54.920
doing what he's always done best, working alone, relying on
27
00:01:54.959 --> 00:01:59.239
his own competence, avoiding the messy complications of human relationships.
28
00:02:00.040 --> 00:02:02.640
But as Earl becomes more successful as a drug mule,
29
00:02:03.040 --> 00:02:06.599
he also becomes more isolated from the family he's supposedly
30
00:02:06.640 --> 00:02:09.599
trying to help. The money that was supposed to solve
31
00:02:09.599 --> 00:02:13.479
his problems creates new ones. The independence that was supposed
32
00:02:13.479 --> 00:02:16.960
to protect him makes him vulnerable in ways he never anticipated.
33
00:02:18.479 --> 00:02:21.159
The Mule was Eastwood's first acting role in six years,
34
00:02:21.599 --> 00:02:24.800
and many critics noted how perfectly the character fit his
35
00:02:24.960 --> 00:02:29.400
established screen persona. Earl Stone had the same self reliance,
36
00:02:29.879 --> 00:02:33.919
the same competence, the same difficulty with emotional expression that
37
00:02:33.960 --> 00:02:37.719
had characterized Eastwood characters for decades, but Earle was also
38
00:02:37.840 --> 00:02:41.639
something new, an Eastwood character who was forced to confront
39
00:02:41.639 --> 00:02:45.319
the costs of those traditional masculine virtues, who discovered that
40
00:02:45.479 --> 00:02:50.840
independence could become isolation, that professional success could mask personal failure,
41
00:02:51.439 --> 00:02:54.199
that the strong, silent type might not be strong enough
42
00:02:54.240 --> 00:02:58.360
to handle the consequences of his own choices. Eastwood's performance
43
00:02:58.400 --> 00:03:02.159
was remarkable for its honesty about aging and its willingness
44
00:03:02.199 --> 00:03:07.080
to show an elderly man grappling with physical and cognitive decline.
45
00:03:07.120 --> 00:03:10.560
Earle wasn't the cool, controlled figure of earlier Eastwood films.
46
00:03:11.080 --> 00:03:16.000
He was forgetful, physically frail, sometimes confused about technology and
47
00:03:16.039 --> 00:03:20.840
contemporary culture. But Earle was also still recognizably competent in
48
00:03:20.919 --> 00:03:25.080
ways that mattered. He could drive long distances, handle stress,
49
00:03:25.520 --> 00:03:28.840
think quickly under pressure. The film showed how aging could
50
00:03:28.840 --> 00:03:33.360
diminish some capabilities while leaving others intact, how competence could
51
00:03:33.400 --> 00:03:36.960
persist even as other aspects of identity became more fragile.
52
00:03:38.680 --> 00:03:41.719
The film's treatment of Earl's relationship with his family was
53
00:03:41.800 --> 00:03:45.919
particularly complex. His estrangement from his daughter and ex wife
54
00:03:46.280 --> 00:03:51.039
wasn't presented as entirely his fault or entirely theirs. Instead,
55
00:03:51.080 --> 00:03:54.080
it was shown as the predictable result of decades of
56
00:03:54.120 --> 00:04:00.439
small choices, Earle prioritizing workover family events, choosing professional obligatations
57
00:04:00.560 --> 00:04:05.240
over personal relationships, assuming that providing financially was equivalent to
58
00:04:05.240 --> 00:04:10.039
providing emotionally. These weren't dramatic failures or obvious betrayals. They
59
00:04:10.039 --> 00:04:13.560
were the accumulated costs of a particular approach to masculinity,
60
00:04:14.039 --> 00:04:16.439
a particular understanding of what it meant to be a
61
00:04:16.439 --> 00:04:19.800
good husband and father, a particular way of showing love
62
00:04:19.879 --> 00:04:24.360
through work rather than presence. The film's approach to Earl's
63
00:04:24.360 --> 00:04:28.040
criminal activity was equally nuanced. Earle didn't become a drug
64
00:04:28.079 --> 00:04:30.879
courier because he was evil or desperate, but because he
65
00:04:31.000 --> 00:04:34.759
was practical and competent. The cartel needed someone who could
66
00:04:34.839 --> 00:04:38.920
drive across the country without attracting attention. Earl needed money
67
00:04:38.920 --> 00:04:41.920
and had the skills to earn it. The moral complexity
68
00:04:41.920 --> 00:04:46.680
of Earl's situation reflected broader issues about aging, economic security,
69
00:04:46.920 --> 00:04:51.120
and the underground economy. Earle wasn't a typical criminal. He
70
00:04:51.240 --> 00:04:53.600
was a ninety year old man trying to solve practical
71
00:04:53.639 --> 00:04:56.879
problems using the skills he had available. But the film
72
00:04:56.920 --> 00:05:00.399
also showed how Earl's moral blindness about his criminal actingivity
73
00:05:00.879 --> 00:05:05.480
mirrored his moral blindness about his family relationships. In both cases,
74
00:05:05.680 --> 00:05:10.160
he focused on practical outcomes while ignoring emotional and ethical costs.
75
00:05:11.319 --> 00:05:15.519
Bradley Cooper's performance as the DEA agent pursuing Earl provided
76
00:05:15.560 --> 00:05:19.680
an interesting counterpoint to Eastwood's character. Cooper's agent was younger,
77
00:05:20.040 --> 00:05:25.160
more technologically sophisticated, more concerned with procedure and protocol, but
78
00:05:25.240 --> 00:05:29.680
he was also dealing with similar issues, balancing professional obligations
79
00:05:29.680 --> 00:05:33.399
with family responsibilities, trying to be both effective at work
80
00:05:33.600 --> 00:05:36.920
and present at home. The relationship between Earl and the
81
00:05:36.959 --> 00:05:41.160
agent suggested that the conflicts between work and family, between
82
00:05:41.199 --> 00:05:46.160
professional success and personal connection weren't generational issues, but ongoing
83
00:05:46.279 --> 00:05:50.639
challenges that each generation had to navigate in its own way.
84
00:05:51.439 --> 00:05:54.600
The film's treatment of the Mexican cartel members was more
85
00:05:54.639 --> 00:05:58.480
complex than typical crime dramas. Instead of presenting them as
86
00:05:58.519 --> 00:06:03.480
stereotypical villains, Eastwoods showed them as professionals operating a business,
87
00:06:04.040 --> 00:06:08.519
individuals with their own codes of conduct impersonal relationships. This
88
00:06:08.639 --> 00:06:11.879
didn't excuse their criminal activity or minimize the harm caused
89
00:06:11.879 --> 00:06:15.800
by drug trafficking, but it reflected Eastwood's mature understanding that
90
00:06:15.920 --> 00:06:19.879
even people engaged in harmful activities are still human beings
91
00:06:19.879 --> 00:06:25.480
with comprehensible motivations and recognizable emotions. The film's visual style
92
00:06:25.560 --> 00:06:31.120
reflected both Earl's perspective and Eastwood's directorial approach. The landscapes
93
00:06:31.120 --> 00:06:35.000
were beautiful but lonely, emphasizing the isolation that came with
94
00:06:35.120 --> 00:06:39.879
constant travel. The interiors were modest and functional, reflecting Earl's
95
00:06:39.920 --> 00:06:43.920
practical approach to life. Most importantly, the film's pacing allowed
96
00:06:43.920 --> 00:06:47.959
for both action and reflection for both Earl's professional competence
97
00:06:48.000 --> 00:06:50.839
as a courier and his growing awareness of what he
98
00:06:50.959 --> 00:06:55.639
had sacrificed for that competence. The film's climax brought together
99
00:06:55.720 --> 00:06:57.839
all of its themes in a sequence that was both
100
00:06:57.879 --> 00:07:02.199
surprising and inevitable. When Earle finally chooses family over work,
101
00:07:02.560 --> 00:07:05.680
attending his ex wife's bedside instead of making a crucial
102
00:07:05.720 --> 00:07:08.680
drug delivery, he's caught by the DEA and faces the
103
00:07:08.720 --> 00:07:13.040
consequences of his criminal activity. But Earle's choice wasn't presented
104
00:07:13.079 --> 00:07:17.000
as redemptive in any simple sense. He couldn't undo decades
105
00:07:17.000 --> 00:07:20.360
of neglect by making one right choice, his family didn't
106
00:07:20.360 --> 00:07:24.199
immediately forgive him or welcome him back. The damage caused
107
00:07:24.199 --> 00:07:27.800
by his priorities couldn't be easily repaired. Instead, Earle's choice
108
00:07:27.879 --> 00:07:31.720
was presented as a recognition, an acknowledgment that he had
109
00:07:31.759 --> 00:07:35.639
spent his life pursuing the wrong things. That professional success
110
00:07:35.720 --> 00:07:40.720
and personal competence weren't sufficient for human fulfillment, that independence
111
00:07:40.759 --> 00:07:45.000
without connection was just another form of prison. The film's
112
00:07:45.120 --> 00:07:48.720
ending showed Earl in actual prison, finally forced to confront
113
00:07:48.759 --> 00:07:52.319
the consequences of his choices, while also finally having the
114
00:07:52.399 --> 00:07:55.000
time and space to reflect on what those choices had
115
00:07:55.040 --> 00:07:59.040
cost him. But even in prison, Earle wasn't entirely broken
116
00:07:59.160 --> 00:08:02.480
or defeated. He had learned something about himself and about
117
00:08:02.560 --> 00:08:07.879
what mattered. He was still competent, still capable of forming relationships,
118
00:08:07.920 --> 00:08:11.240
still able to contribute something valuable to the world around him.
119
00:08:12.000 --> 00:08:14.959
As a piece of filmmaking, The Mule was both intimate
120
00:08:15.000 --> 00:08:19.839
and epic, both personal and universal. Eastwood used Earl's specific
121
00:08:19.920 --> 00:08:24.399
story to examine broader questions about aging masculinity in the
122
00:08:24.439 --> 00:08:28.279
American Dream. The film suggested that the qualities that made
123
00:08:28.319 --> 00:08:34.320
Earle successful in his professional life, independence, self reliance focus
124
00:08:34.360 --> 00:08:38.960
on practical outcomes also made him unsuccessful in his personal life,
125
00:08:39.399 --> 00:08:43.480
but it didn't condemn these qualities entirely. Instead, it showed
126
00:08:43.519 --> 00:08:47.799
how they needed to be balanced with other virtues emotional availability,
127
00:08:48.159 --> 00:08:52.440
willingness to ask for help, recognition that relationships require investment
128
00:08:52.600 --> 00:08:58.080
in maintenance. The film's commercial success over one hundred million
129
00:08:58.120 --> 00:09:02.120
dollars worldwide proved so that audiences were interested in stories
130
00:09:02.159 --> 00:09:06.200
about aging, that they could handle complex moral questions about
131
00:09:06.240 --> 00:09:10.440
crime and family, that Eastwood's screen presence remained compelling even
132
00:09:10.519 --> 00:09:13.840
as he approached ninety. But the film's critical reception was
133
00:09:13.879 --> 00:09:18.159
more mixed. Some praised Eastwood's honest portrayal of aging and
134
00:09:18.240 --> 00:09:22.519
his willingness to examine the costs of traditional masculinity. Others
135
00:09:22.559 --> 00:09:27.279
criticized the film's pace, its moral ambiguity about Earl's criminal activity,
136
00:09:27.720 --> 00:09:31.720
its treatment of women and minority characters. The most significant
137
00:09:31.720 --> 00:09:35.279
criticism was that the film seemed to excuse Earl's neglect
138
00:09:35.320 --> 00:09:39.200
of his family while condemning his criminal activity, that it
139
00:09:39.279 --> 00:09:42.519
was more sympathetic to his professional failures than to his
140
00:09:42.600 --> 00:09:46.440
personal ones. But this criticism missed the film's larger point
141
00:09:46.799 --> 00:09:50.519
that Earl's criminal activity and his family neglect were symptoms
142
00:09:50.519 --> 00:09:54.200
of the same underlying problem, the same inability to recognize
143
00:09:54.200 --> 00:09:59.159
that competence and independence weren't sufficient for human fulfillment. Let's
144
00:09:59.159 --> 00:10:02.240
take a break here. When we come back, we'll talk
145
00:10:02.279 --> 00:10:05.399
about what the Mule revealed about Eastwood's understanding of his
146
00:10:05.440 --> 00:10:09.200
own career in screen persona, how it functioned as both
147
00:10:09.240 --> 00:10:11.919
a summary of his major themes and a final statement
148
00:10:12.039 --> 00:10:16.159
about American masculinity, and why his examination of aging and
149
00:10:16.240 --> 00:10:27.919
family responsibility resonated with audiences across generational lines. We're back.
150
00:10:28.440 --> 00:10:31.320
The Mule appeared at a moment when America was grappling
151
00:10:31.360 --> 00:10:37.080
with questions about aging, economic security, and intergenerational relationships that
152
00:10:37.159 --> 00:10:40.840
had been building for decades. The Baby Boom generation was
153
00:10:40.919 --> 00:10:45.360
reaching retirement age, often discovering that their assumptions about financial
154
00:10:45.399 --> 00:10:50.559
security and family relationships were no longer reliable. Earlstone represented
155
00:10:50.600 --> 00:10:54.200
a particular version of this generational experience, the man who
156
00:10:54.200 --> 00:10:58.159
had achieved professional success according to traditional measures, but who
157
00:10:58.200 --> 00:11:01.720
discovered that success hadn't provided the security or satisfaction he
158
00:11:01.759 --> 00:11:06.000
had expected. His turn to criminal activity wasn't just about money.
159
00:11:06.080 --> 00:11:10.399
It was about maintaining relevance, continuing to feel useful and competent,
160
00:11:11.039 --> 00:11:15.200
finding ways to contribute when conventional opportunities were no longer available.
161
00:11:15.759 --> 00:11:19.720
That theme resonated with audiences who were dealing with similar challenges,
162
00:11:20.279 --> 00:11:24.679
retirees whose savings were insufficient, older workers whose skills were
163
00:11:24.679 --> 00:11:28.759
no longer valued, parents whose adult children lived different lives
164
00:11:28.799 --> 00:11:32.399
with different values. The films suggested that these weren't just
165
00:11:32.559 --> 00:11:36.759
individual problems, but cultural ones, reflecting broader changes in how
166
00:11:36.799 --> 00:11:41.720
American society understood work, family, and the relationship between generations.
167
00:11:43.000 --> 00:11:48.080
Earl's relationship with technology was particularly significant. He couldn't use GPS,
168
00:11:48.440 --> 00:11:53.000
didn't understand social media, was baffled by contemporary communication methods,
169
00:11:53.559 --> 00:11:56.519
but he could still drive across the country, read maps,
170
00:11:56.720 --> 00:12:00.960
navigate by landmarks, and intuition. The films showed how technological
171
00:12:01.039 --> 00:12:04.679
change could make certain skills obsolete while others remained valuable,
172
00:12:05.240 --> 00:12:08.919
How aging could involve both loss and persistence of capability,
173
00:12:09.519 --> 00:12:13.879
How competence could be generational and contextual rather than absolute.
174
00:12:13.919 --> 00:12:17.840
That understanding became increasingly important as American society dealt with
175
00:12:17.960 --> 00:12:22.279
rapid technological change, As younger and older generations developed different
176
00:12:22.320 --> 00:12:27.840
approaches to communication, work, and relationship building. The film's treatment
177
00:12:27.879 --> 00:12:31.480
of Earl's war service was also significant. His Korean War
178
00:12:31.519 --> 00:12:35.279
experience was mentioned, but not explored in detail, presented as
179
00:12:35.360 --> 00:12:38.720
part of his background rather than as a defining trauma
180
00:12:39.120 --> 00:12:43.600
or source of heroism. This approach reflected Eastwood's mature understanding
181
00:12:43.679 --> 00:12:47.000
of military service, that it was one experience among many,
182
00:12:47.440 --> 00:12:50.840
rather than the central organizing principle of a person's identity,
183
00:12:51.399 --> 00:12:55.679
that veterans were individuals with complex motivations rather than symbols
184
00:12:55.679 --> 00:13:00.679
of particular political or cultural positions. Earl's criminal all activity
185
00:13:00.759 --> 00:13:04.039
was enabled by his veteran status, his clean record, his
186
00:13:04.120 --> 00:13:08.120
ability to travel without suspicion, his understanding of hierarchy and
187
00:13:08.159 --> 00:13:11.320
following orders, but the film didn't present his service as
188
00:13:11.360 --> 00:13:15.720
either excuse or justification for his later choices. Instead, it
189
00:13:15.799 --> 00:13:21.279
showed how the same qualities that made him an effective soldier, discipline, competence,
190
00:13:21.960 --> 00:13:26.080
willingness to follow instructions could be applied to various purposes,
191
00:13:26.559 --> 00:13:31.200
some admirable and others destructive. The film's exploration of family
192
00:13:31.279 --> 00:13:36.320
dynamics was particularly complex. Earle's estrangement from his daughter wasn't
193
00:13:36.320 --> 00:13:40.960
presented as entirely his fault or entirely hers. Instead, it
194
00:13:41.080 --> 00:13:45.639
was shown as the result of accumulated misunderstandings, different priorities,
195
00:13:46.039 --> 00:13:50.799
and the difficulty of maintaining relationships across generational and cultural divides.
196
00:13:51.679 --> 00:13:56.000
Earle's assumption that providing financially was equivalent to providing emotionally
197
00:13:56.000 --> 00:14:01.919
reflected broader cultural patterns about masculinity and family responsibility. His
198
00:14:02.000 --> 00:14:05.639
surprise at his family's anger reflected genuine confusion about what
199
00:14:05.720 --> 00:14:09.399
he had done wrong, honest bewilderment about why his efforts
200
00:14:09.440 --> 00:14:13.120
weren't appreciated. But the film also showed how Earl's family
201
00:14:13.200 --> 00:14:16.639
had their own lives, their own priorities, their own ways
202
00:14:16.639 --> 00:14:20.840
of understanding love and responsibility. Their rejection of Earl wasn't
203
00:14:20.879 --> 00:14:24.320
cruel or unfair. It was a natural response to decades
204
00:14:24.320 --> 00:14:29.919
of feeling unimportant compared to his professional obligations. The resolution
205
00:14:30.039 --> 00:14:33.879
of these family conflicts wasn't simple or complete. Earle's choice
206
00:14:33.879 --> 00:14:37.200
to prioritize his ex wife's bedside over his drug delivery
207
00:14:37.240 --> 00:14:40.879
was significant, but it couldn't undo decades of different choices.
208
00:14:41.519 --> 00:14:44.799
His family's gradual acceptance of him was tentative and conditional,
209
00:14:45.159 --> 00:14:48.759
based on his actions rather than his intentions. That realistic
210
00:14:48.799 --> 00:14:54.639
approach to family reconciliation reflected Eastwood's understanding that relationships damaged
211
00:14:54.679 --> 00:14:58.799
over decades couldn't be repaired through single gestures, that trust
212
00:14:58.879 --> 00:15:02.840
had to be rebuilt great actually through consistent behavior rather
213
00:15:02.879 --> 00:15:07.000
than dramatic declarations. The film's treatment of Earl's criminal associates
214
00:15:07.039 --> 00:15:10.919
was also nuanced. The cartel members weren't presented as particularly
215
00:15:10.960 --> 00:15:14.200
evil or violent. They were business people operating in an
216
00:15:14.240 --> 00:15:17.799
illegal market, professionals with their own codes of conduct and
217
00:15:17.840 --> 00:15:21.759
standards of behavior. This didn't excuse their involvement in drug
218
00:15:21.840 --> 00:15:25.559
trafficking or minimize the harm caused by their activities, but
219
00:15:25.679 --> 00:15:29.960
it reflected Eastwood's understanding that even people engage in harmful
220
00:15:30.000 --> 00:15:35.960
activities were still human beings with comprehensible motivations and recognizable emotions.
221
00:15:36.879 --> 00:15:40.600
That approach became increasingly important as American society dealt with
222
00:15:40.679 --> 00:15:44.919
complex criminal justice issues, as communities struggled to understand how
223
00:15:44.919 --> 00:15:49.360
to respond to crime without dehumanizing criminals, as families dealt
224
00:15:49.399 --> 00:15:53.720
with the consequences of mass incarceration and drug policy. For
225
00:15:53.840 --> 00:15:58.720
Eastwood personally, the Mule represented both a summation and a departure.
226
00:15:59.279 --> 00:16:01.799
The film syn the sized themes he had been exploring
227
00:16:01.799 --> 00:16:07.559
for decades, the costs of violence, the difficulty of maintaining relationships,
228
00:16:07.600 --> 00:16:11.799
the way individual choices create broader social consequences. But it
229
00:16:11.879 --> 00:16:16.000
also showed his willingness to examine his own screen persona critically,
230
00:16:16.600 --> 00:16:21.000
to acknowledge the limitations of traditional masculine virtues, to show
231
00:16:21.039 --> 00:16:24.159
how the qualities that made his characters effective in crisis
232
00:16:24.200 --> 00:16:29.200
situations could become liabilities in everyday life. Earl Stone wasn't
233
00:16:29.200 --> 00:16:32.720
just another Eastwood character. He was what happens to Eastwood
234
00:16:32.759 --> 00:16:35.960
characters when they get old, when their particular skills are
235
00:16:35.960 --> 00:16:39.080
no longer needed, when they have to confront the emotional
236
00:16:39.120 --> 00:16:43.080
costs of their chosen lifestyle. The film's commercial success proved
237
00:16:43.080 --> 00:16:46.919
that audiences were still interested in Eastwood's screen presence, that
238
00:16:47.000 --> 00:16:50.480
they could handle complex moral questions about crime and family,
239
00:16:51.000 --> 00:16:54.440
that stories about aging could be both entertaining and meaningful.