WEBVTT
1
00:00:03.200 --> 00:00:12.359
Kalaruga Shark Media. This is Eastwood reloaded. We've watched Clint
2
00:00:12.359 --> 00:00:16.960
Eastwood evolve from Western icon to contemporary filmmaker, from action
3
00:00:17.079 --> 00:00:20.559
star to artist, exploring the deepest questions about human nature.
4
00:00:21.399 --> 00:00:24.359
Now we need to talk about perhaps his most ambitious project,
5
00:00:24.800 --> 00:00:27.559
A film that took the most American of genres, the
6
00:00:27.600 --> 00:00:30.519
World War II movie, and used it to examine war
7
00:00:30.559 --> 00:00:34.840
from the perspective of America's enemies. Released in two thousand
8
00:00:34.840 --> 00:00:39.320
and six, filmed entirely in Japanese with Japanese actors, a
9
00:00:39.399 --> 00:00:41.920
companion piece to Flags of Our Fathers that told the
10
00:00:41.960 --> 00:00:44.840
same battle from both sides of the conflict. The film
11
00:00:44.880 --> 00:00:49.039
that proved Eastwood could transcend not just genre limitations, but
12
00:00:49.119 --> 00:00:53.200
cultural ones, that his understanding of human nature was universal
13
00:00:53.320 --> 00:01:00.439
enough to encompass even those traditionally portrayed as inhuman This
14
00:01:00.520 --> 00:01:06.640
is Episode eight, two thousand and six Letters from Ewojima.
15
00:01:07.799 --> 00:01:11.159
It was Eastwood at seventy six, using everything he'd learned
16
00:01:11.159 --> 00:01:15.239
about war, violence and the stories we tell ourselves about
17
00:01:15.280 --> 00:01:20.640
both to create something unprecedented in American cinema, A war
18
00:01:20.680 --> 00:01:24.599
film that humanized the enemy without glorifying war, that showed
19
00:01:24.599 --> 00:01:29.000
the universal tragedy of conflict without diminishing the specific costs
20
00:01:29.040 --> 00:01:33.760
paid by any side. Here's what happened. While researching Flags
21
00:01:33.760 --> 00:01:36.840
of Our Fathers, Eastwood discovered that the letters and diaries
22
00:01:36.879 --> 00:01:41.680
of Japanese soldiers on Eojima had been preserved, translated, and published.
23
00:01:42.439 --> 00:01:46.000
Reading them, he realized that these men portrayed in American
24
00:01:46.040 --> 00:01:51.000
war films as faceless fanatics were individuals with families, fears,
25
00:01:51.040 --> 00:01:55.719
and hopes remarkably similar to American soldiers. He decided to
26
00:01:55.719 --> 00:01:58.519
make two films about the same battle. Flags of Our
27
00:01:58.560 --> 00:02:03.079
Fathers would show the American EXAs experience the heroism, the propaganda,
28
00:02:03.480 --> 00:02:08.280
the way individual sacrifice gets transformed into national mythology. Letters
29
00:02:08.280 --> 00:02:12.439
from Iwojima would show the Japanese experience the same heroism,
30
00:02:12.680 --> 00:02:18.759
the same propaganda, the same individual sacrifice, serving different national mythologies. Together,
31
00:02:18.840 --> 00:02:21.680
the films would show that war is a human tragedy,
32
00:02:22.120 --> 00:02:26.039
regardless of which side wins, that courage and cowardice exist
33
00:02:26.080 --> 00:02:29.400
in every army, that young men die for causes they
34
00:02:29.400 --> 00:02:32.840
may not fully understand, while old men make decisions they
35
00:02:32.879 --> 00:02:36.319
may not have to live with. Letters from Iwojima follows
36
00:02:36.400 --> 00:02:40.719
General Tadamichi Kuribayashi, the Japanese commander tasked with defending the
37
00:02:40.759 --> 00:02:45.000
island against American invasion. Kuribayashi knows the battle is hopeless,
38
00:02:45.479 --> 00:02:49.599
the Americans have overwhelming superiority in men, ships, and aircraft.
39
00:02:50.039 --> 00:02:52.400
But he also knows that Japan expects him to fight
40
00:02:52.400 --> 00:02:54.960
to the death, to take as many Americans with him
41
00:02:55.000 --> 00:03:00.479
as possible, to demonstrate Japanese honor and resolve even in defeat.
42
00:03:00.599 --> 00:03:04.479
The film shows Kurubayashi trying to balance these impossible demands
43
00:03:05.039 --> 00:03:10.039
military realism and cultural expectation, individual survival and collective honor,
44
00:03:10.479 --> 00:03:13.919
his duty to his emperor and his responsibility to his men.
45
00:03:14.439 --> 00:03:18.159
It's a position that offers no good choices, only degrees
46
00:03:18.199 --> 00:03:23.400
of catastrophe. Ken Watanabi's performance as Kuribayashi anchored the film
47
00:03:23.439 --> 00:03:28.439
with quiet, dignity and intelligence. This wasn't the stereotypical Japanese
48
00:03:28.520 --> 00:03:33.680
military leader of American war films, cruel, fanatical, divorced from
49
00:03:33.759 --> 00:03:38.199
human feeling. Kuribayashi was a professional soldier who had spent
50
00:03:38.240 --> 00:03:42.599
time in America, understood American capabilities and intentions, and knew
51
00:03:42.639 --> 00:03:46.039
exactly how hopeless his situation was. But he was also
52
00:03:46.080 --> 00:03:49.280
a man who believed in duty, honor, and the necessity
53
00:03:49.319 --> 00:03:53.120
of fighting well even in lost causes. Watanabi showed how
54
00:03:53.120 --> 00:03:56.919
these beliefs could coexist with clear eyed realism about the
55
00:03:56.960 --> 00:04:00.520
costs of war and the futility of his mission. The
56
00:04:00.560 --> 00:04:04.879
film's approach to Japanese military culture was sophisticated and nuanced.
57
00:04:05.400 --> 00:04:08.840
It showed the way individual soldiers were caught between conflicting
58
00:04:08.879 --> 00:04:14.159
loyalties to their families, to their comrades, to their emperor,
59
00:04:14.199 --> 00:04:18.279
to their own survival instincts. Some embraced the prospect of
60
00:04:18.279 --> 00:04:21.879
death with genuine fervor, Others went through the motions while
61
00:04:21.920 --> 00:04:26.439
privately hoping to survive. Most fell somewhere in between, trying
62
00:04:26.480 --> 00:04:31.519
to find honor and impossible circumstances. Eastwood didn't romanticize Japanese
63
00:04:31.519 --> 00:04:35.319
attitudes toward death and sacrifice, but he also didn't dismiss
64
00:04:35.360 --> 00:04:38.959
them as simple fanaticism. He showed how cultural values that
65
00:04:39.040 --> 00:04:43.920
seemed admirable in peacetime loyalty, self sacrifice, dedication to duty,
66
00:04:44.439 --> 00:04:49.639
could become destructive when applied to hopeless military situations. The
67
00:04:49.639 --> 00:04:54.160
film's treatment of the American enemy was equally complex. American
68
00:04:54.199 --> 00:04:58.319
soldiers appeared as individuals rather than symbols, capable of both
69
00:04:58.360 --> 00:05:02.360
brutality and compassion, fighting for reasons they may not have
70
00:05:02.480 --> 00:05:05.720
fully understood, but with the same courage and fear as
71
00:05:05.759 --> 00:05:10.920
their Japanese opponents. Most importantly, Eastwood showed that the dehumanization
72
00:05:11.000 --> 00:05:14.480
of enemies, the tendency to see them as less than human,
73
00:05:15.040 --> 00:05:18.680
was a psychological necessity for soldiers on both sides, but
74
00:05:18.800 --> 00:05:22.120
also a tragic distortion of reality that made peace more
75
00:05:22.120 --> 00:05:26.879
difficult and war more terrible. The film's visual style reflected
76
00:05:26.920 --> 00:05:30.720
Eastwood's mature understanding of how to use cinema to explore
77
00:05:30.759 --> 00:05:35.079
serious themes. The color palette was muted, emphasizing the gray
78
00:05:35.120 --> 00:05:39.600
ash and black volcanic rock of Iwo Jima. The cinematography
79
00:05:39.680 --> 00:05:43.040
was restrained, allowing the performances and relationships to carry the
80
00:05:43.079 --> 00:05:49.959
emotional weight. The battle scenes were filmed with characteristic realism, brutal, chaotic, terrifying,
81
00:05:50.519 --> 00:05:54.360
but they were never glorified or stylized for entertainment value.
82
00:05:54.560 --> 00:05:58.560
Violence was shown as necessary but never noble, effective but
83
00:05:58.720 --> 00:06:04.279
always costly, unavoidable but never desirable. The film's structure followed
84
00:06:04.279 --> 00:06:07.399
the ark of the battle itself from the initial American
85
00:06:07.399 --> 00:06:11.680
bombardment through the gradual Japanese retreat into the island's cave
86
00:06:11.720 --> 00:06:16.000
system to the final desperate defense and inevitable defeat. But
87
00:06:16.120 --> 00:06:19.040
it also followed the emotional arc of men coming to
88
00:06:19.120 --> 00:06:22.519
terms with their own mortality, their loyalty to each other,
89
00:06:23.040 --> 00:06:28.240
and the meaning of their sacrifice. The relationship between Kuribayashi
90
00:06:28.279 --> 00:06:32.319
and Baron Nishi, played by Suyoshi Ihara, provided the film's
91
00:06:32.319 --> 00:06:36.600
emotional center. Nishi was an Olympic equestrian who had competed
92
00:06:36.639 --> 00:06:41.319
in Los Angeles, spoke English, and understood American culture. His
93
00:06:41.319 --> 00:06:46.120
friendship with Kuribayashi showed how shared intelligence and cultural sophistication
94
00:06:46.600 --> 00:06:50.519
could create bonds that transcended military hierarchy. But the film
95
00:06:50.560 --> 00:06:52.879
also showed how these bonds could be tested by the
96
00:06:52.920 --> 00:06:56.759
extreme conditions of war, how even the strongest friendships could
97
00:06:56.800 --> 00:06:59.480
be strained by the pressure of making life and death
98
00:06:59.519 --> 00:07:03.480
decision for other people. The film's treatment of ordinary soldiers
99
00:07:03.560 --> 00:07:09.079
was equally compelling. Saigo, played by Kazunari Ninomiya, represented the
100
00:07:09.160 --> 00:07:12.000
reluctant conscript who wanted nothing more than to return to
101
00:07:12.079 --> 00:07:16.000
his wife an unborn child. His journey from cynical survival
102
00:07:16.000 --> 00:07:19.600
to genuine courage showed how war could transform people in
103
00:07:19.639 --> 00:07:24.199
ways they never expected. Other characters represented different responses to
104
00:07:24.240 --> 00:07:29.319
impossible circumstances. Some embraced death as a release, others fought
105
00:07:29.360 --> 00:07:33.199
desperately for survival. Most simply tried to do their duty
106
00:07:33.279 --> 00:07:36.439
while hoping for the best. What made Letters from Iwo
107
00:07:36.519 --> 00:07:40.800
Jima remarkable was its refusal to judge these different responses.
108
00:07:41.360 --> 00:07:45.399
The film understood that courage and cowardice, honor and pragmatism,
109
00:07:45.879 --> 00:07:50.480
loyalty and self preservation were all human responses to inhuman circumstances.
110
00:07:51.000 --> 00:07:54.920
No single response was entirely right or entirely wrong. The
111
00:07:55.000 --> 00:07:59.600
film's ending was both inevitable and devastating. The Americans eventually
112
00:07:59.600 --> 00:08:03.879
overran the Japanese positions, but add enormous costs to both sides.
113
00:08:04.879 --> 00:08:08.680
Kuribayashi died fighting, having done his duty as he understood it.
114
00:08:09.160 --> 00:08:13.240
Saigo survived, captured by American forces, who treated him humanely
115
00:08:13.519 --> 00:08:17.920
despite everything that had happened. The final image Saigo on
116
00:08:18.000 --> 00:08:20.480
an American ship looking back at the island where so
117
00:08:20.560 --> 00:08:24.120
many of his comrades died, suggested both the tragedy of
118
00:08:24.160 --> 00:08:28.199
war and the possibility of reconciliation. The battle was over,
119
00:08:28.319 --> 00:08:32.320
but the human costs would be felt for generations. As
120
00:08:32.360 --> 00:08:36.200
a piece of filmmaking, Letters from Iwo Jima was technically superb.
121
00:08:36.679 --> 00:08:40.559
The production design recreated the claustrophobic conditions of the Japanese
122
00:08:40.600 --> 00:08:45.039
cave system with remarkable authenticity. The sound design made the
123
00:08:45.080 --> 00:08:49.279
audience feel the terror of constant bombardment. The editing maintained
124
00:08:49.279 --> 00:08:52.600
perfect pacing throughout a story that moved between intimate character
125
00:08:52.639 --> 00:08:56.399
moments and large scale military action. But the film's real
126
00:08:56.399 --> 00:09:00.679
achievement was emotional and moral, rather than technical. Eastwood had
127
00:09:00.679 --> 00:09:05.000
created something unprecedented in American cinema, a war film that
128
00:09:05.039 --> 00:09:08.639
showed the enemy as fully human without diminishing the justice
129
00:09:08.639 --> 00:09:12.200
of the American cause, that explored the universal tragedy of
130
00:09:12.240 --> 00:09:16.240
war without falling into false equivalencies about who was right
131
00:09:16.320 --> 00:09:21.320
and who was wrong. The film's reception was extraordinary. Critics
132
00:09:21.360 --> 00:09:25.440
recognized it as a masterpiece of anti war filmmaking. Audiences
133
00:09:25.480 --> 00:09:29.000
embraced it despite its foreign language and challenging subject matter.
134
00:09:29.559 --> 00:09:33.159
The Academy nominated it for four Oscars, including Best Picture
135
00:09:33.200 --> 00:09:37.559
and Best Director. But more importantly, Letters from Ewojima influenced
136
00:09:37.559 --> 00:09:41.639
how Americans thought about war. Enemy combatants in the nature
137
00:09:41.639 --> 00:09:45.320
of conflict itself. It showed that understanding your enemies as
138
00:09:45.360 --> 00:09:49.600
human beings didn't mean accepting their cause, that recognizing their
139
00:09:49.639 --> 00:09:53.039
courage didn't diminish your own. Let's take a break here.
140
00:09:53.679 --> 00:09:56.159
When we come back, we'll talk about what Letters from
141
00:09:56.159 --> 00:09:59.159
Ewojima meant for war films as a genre, how it
142
00:09:59.279 --> 00:10:04.159
Influencedmerican foreign policy discussions, and why Eastwood's empathetic approach to
143
00:10:04.200 --> 00:10:12.600
former enemies remains relevant in an era of global conflict.
144
00:10:14.679 --> 00:10:18.120
We're back. Letters from iwo Jima appeared at a moment
145
00:10:18.200 --> 00:10:21.919
when America was deeply involved in conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan,
146
00:10:22.639 --> 00:10:26.159
when questions about the nature of enemy combatants, the treatment
147
00:10:26.200 --> 00:10:30.120
of prisoners, and the morality of war were front page news.
148
00:10:30.799 --> 00:10:34.840
The film didn't address these contemporary conflicts directly, but it
149
00:10:34.919 --> 00:10:38.039
provided a framework for thinking about them that was both
150
00:10:38.080 --> 00:10:43.960
emotionally sophisticated and morally complex. The film's central insight that
151
00:10:44.159 --> 00:10:49.080
enemies are human beings with families, fears, and hopes, seems obvious,
152
00:10:49.159 --> 00:10:52.320
but it was revolutionary in the context of American war films.
153
00:10:54.120 --> 00:10:57.000
Most World War II movies had portrayed Japanese soldiers as
154
00:10:57.039 --> 00:11:01.960
either faceless fanatics or cartoon villains. Letters from Iwajima showed
155
00:11:01.960 --> 00:11:07.279
them as individuals making impossible choices in impossible circumstances. That
156
00:11:07.399 --> 00:11:13.039
humanization didn't excuse Japanese war crimes or diminish American sacrifices. Instead,
157
00:11:13.080 --> 00:11:16.559
it suggested that understanding the humanity of your enemies was
158
00:11:16.679 --> 00:11:19.480
essential for understanding the full cost of war and the
159
00:11:19.480 --> 00:11:23.600
full meaning of victory. The film's approach to military leadership
160
00:11:23.759 --> 00:11:28.320
was particularly sophisticated. Kuribayashi wasn't portrayed as either a brilliant
161
00:11:28.320 --> 00:11:32.559
strategist or a foolish commander. He was a professional soldier
162
00:11:32.720 --> 00:11:37.159
trying to do his job under impossible conditions, making decisions
163
00:11:37.159 --> 00:11:39.159
that would result in the deaths of thousands of his
164
00:11:39.240 --> 00:11:43.320
own men, regardless of what he chose. His relationship with
165
00:11:43.360 --> 00:11:47.559
his subordinates showed how military hierarchy could coexist with genuine
166
00:11:47.559 --> 00:11:51.600
care for individual soldiers, how professional duty could be compatible
167
00:11:51.919 --> 00:11:56.600
with human compassion, how leaders could maintain authority while acknowledging
168
00:11:56.639 --> 00:12:00.879
the terrible costs of their decisions. That new one understanding
169
00:12:00.879 --> 00:12:04.840
of military leadership became relevant to discussions about American commanders
170
00:12:04.879 --> 00:12:09.600
in Iraq and Afghanistan, about the relationship between strategic objectives
171
00:12:09.679 --> 00:12:13.720
and human costs, about the responsibilities of leaders who send
172
00:12:13.759 --> 00:12:18.000
others to fight and die. The film's treatment of Japanese
173
00:12:18.039 --> 00:12:23.840
military culture was equally important. Instead of dismissing concepts like honor, duty,
174
00:12:23.919 --> 00:12:28.080
and sacrifice as foreign or fanatical, Eastwood showed how these
175
00:12:28.159 --> 00:12:32.559
values could motivate extraordinary courage while also leading to unnecessary deaths.
176
00:12:33.080 --> 00:12:36.559
The films suggested that cultural differences and attitudes toward death
177
00:12:36.559 --> 00:12:40.480
and sacrifice were real and significant, but also that these
178
00:12:40.519 --> 00:12:44.960
differences didn't make Japanese soldiers less human or their suffering
179
00:12:45.039 --> 00:12:49.120
less meaningful than American suffering. That understanding became crucial for
180
00:12:49.200 --> 00:12:52.759
American military and diplomatic efforts around the world. The film
181
00:12:52.799 --> 00:12:56.279
showed that you could oppose your enemies while still recognizing
182
00:12:56.320 --> 00:12:59.879
their humanity, that you could fight against their cause while
183
00:13:00.039 --> 00:13:05.240
still understanding their motivations. The film's technical achievements were also significant.
184
00:13:05.720 --> 00:13:10.360
Eastwood's decision to film entirely in Japanese with Japanese actors
185
00:13:10.759 --> 00:13:15.559
created an authenticity that dubbed or subtitled performances couldn't match.
186
00:13:16.399 --> 00:13:19.759
The audience experienced the battle from a genuinely Japanese perspective,
187
00:13:20.360 --> 00:13:24.720
not from an American perspective translated into Japanese. That commitment
188
00:13:24.759 --> 00:13:28.480
to authentic perspective became a model for other filmmakers dealing
189
00:13:28.559 --> 00:13:32.480
with cross cultural subjects. It showed that American audiences were
190
00:13:32.519 --> 00:13:37.600
sophisticated enough to handle foreign languages in unfamiliar cultural contexts,
191
00:13:37.960 --> 00:13:43.279
that authenticity was more important than accessibility. The film's collaboration
192
00:13:43.440 --> 00:13:48.679
with Japanese filmmakers, actors, and cultural consultants also established new
193
00:13:48.720 --> 00:13:53.120
standards for cross cultural production. Eastwood didn't just hire Japanese
194
00:13:53.159 --> 00:13:57.200
actors to play Japanese roles. He worked with Japanese partners
195
00:13:57.320 --> 00:14:01.240
to ensure that the film represented Japanese experience is accurately
196
00:14:01.279 --> 00:14:06.559
and respectfully. That collaborative approach became increasingly important as American
197
00:14:06.559 --> 00:14:11.320
filmmakers began dealing with global subjects in international audiences. Letters
198
00:14:11.360 --> 00:14:15.519
from Iwo Jima showed that successful cross cultural filmmaking required
199
00:14:15.559 --> 00:14:20.399
genuine partnership rather than just cultural consultation. The film's influence
200
00:14:20.440 --> 00:14:24.159
on war films was immediate and lasting. Subsequent American war
201
00:14:24.240 --> 00:14:28.480
movies began including more complex portrayals of enemy forces, more
202
00:14:28.559 --> 00:14:33.399
nuanced examinations of military culture, more realistic depictions of the
203
00:14:33.480 --> 00:14:38.159
human costs of conflict. Films like Zero Dark, Thirty, They
204
00:14:38.200 --> 00:14:41.759
Shall Not Grow Old, and Nineteen Seventeen all showed the
205
00:14:41.759 --> 00:14:45.759
influence of Eastwood's approach. The commitment to showing war as
206
00:14:45.759 --> 00:14:50.120
a human tragedy regardless of which side wins, the refusal
207
00:14:50.159 --> 00:14:53.679
to glorify violence even when it serves just causes, the
208
00:14:53.879 --> 00:14:57.559
understanding that individual courage and sacrifice exist in every army.
209
00:14:58.080 --> 00:15:01.960
But the film's broader cultural in influence was even more significant.
210
00:15:02.600 --> 00:15:05.919
Letters from Ewogima changed how Americans thought about World War II,
211
00:15:06.639 --> 00:15:10.399
moving beyond simple narratives of good versus evil to more
212
00:15:10.440 --> 00:15:13.840
complex understanding of how good people can serve evil causes
213
00:15:14.200 --> 00:15:17.399
and how evil systems can produce individual acts of courage
214
00:15:17.399 --> 00:15:22.240
and decency. That more nuanced understanding of historical conflict became
215
00:15:22.320 --> 00:15:26.679
crucial for American foreign policy discussions. The film showed that
216
00:15:26.720 --> 00:15:30.399
you could oppose regimes while still recognizing the humanity of
217
00:15:30.440 --> 00:15:33.879
people who served them, that you could fight against ideologies
218
00:15:33.919 --> 00:15:37.960
while still understanding the individual motivations of those who embrace them.
219
00:15:39.519 --> 00:15:44.399
For Eastwood personally, Letters from Ewogima represented the culmination of
220
00:15:44.480 --> 00:15:48.320
everything he'd learned about war, violence and the stories we
221
00:15:48.399 --> 00:15:52.639
tell ourselves. About both. The film synthesized insights from his
222
00:15:52.720 --> 00:15:56.679
earlier war films, the understanding that violence corrupts everyone. It
223
00:15:56.799 --> 00:16:01.200
touches that heroism and cowardice exist in every conflict, that
224
00:16:01.200 --> 00:16:04.080
the costs of war are always higher than anyone expects.
225
00:16:04.600 --> 00:16:08.039
But it also showed his growing sophistication as a filmmaker
226
00:16:08.360 --> 00:16:12.120
and as a human being. At seventy six, Eastwood was
227
00:16:12.159 --> 00:16:15.799
old enough to have perspective on American military involvement around
228
00:16:15.840 --> 00:16:20.679
the world, wise enough to understand that strength sometimes requires empathy,
229
00:16:21.440 --> 00:16:24.039
experience enough to know that the most important truths are
230
00:16:24.080 --> 00:16:28.320
often the most difficult to accept. The film's box office performance,
231
00:16:28.840 --> 00:16:32.399
modest by blockbusters standards, but strong for a foreign language film,
232
00:16:32.960 --> 00:16:36.120
proved that American audiences were ready for more complex, more
233
00:16:36.200 --> 00:16:39.840
challenging portrayals of war and conflict. It showed that there
234
00:16:39.919 --> 00:16:43.600
was a market for films that asked difficult questions rather
235
00:16:43.679 --> 00:16:47.720
than providing easy answers. That success encouraged other filmmakers to
236
00:16:47.720 --> 00:16:51.039
take similar risks, to make films about war that went
237
00:16:51.080 --> 00:16:55.240
beyond simple patriotism or anti war sentiment to explore the
238
00:16:55.320 --> 00:17:00.480
full complexity of human behavior under extreme stress. The film's
239
00:17:00.480 --> 00:17:05.680
awards recognition four OSCAR nominations, including Best Picture, established Eastwood