Norway’s Supreme Court Ruling Could Reshape the Høiby Verdict

0:00 Ah Calorougus Shark media at low and welcome to ground and Controversy Norway I'm Your Palace Intrigue host Mark Francis. Norway's Supreme Court has now issued the ruling that many people involved in the Marius Borg Hoyby case had been waiting for, and while it does not decide anything about Hoybi's guilt or innocence, it could matter quite a lot if he is convicted on any of these sexual assault counts. The court ruled in a separate case that what Norwegian media often calls a sleep rape should generally be punished less severely than rape involving violence or threats. In the case before the court, a nineteen year old man had originally been sentenced to three years and three months. The Supreme Court said the correct sentence should instead be two years and four months, later reduced further because of delays in the process. The broader message from the ruling is that Norwegian courts now have direction to look more closely at the circumstances in these cases, rather than defaulting to the old standard. Many lawyers have been using four years.

1:10 That matters because Hoeby is facing four allegations of the same general type involving women who prosecutors say we're asleep or otherwise unable to resist. He denies guilt on those counts, but if the court ultimately finds him guilty on any of them, this ruling is now part of the legal framework the judge will be expected to use. His lawyer, Peter Seculick, moved quickly to argue that the ruling helps his client. He said the Supreme Court case was different because, in his words, there had been no prior sexual contact or indication of interest between the two people involved. Seculik's argument is that in Hoebi's case, the court heard evidence of prior consensual sexual interaction, and he says that should either lead to acquittal or at the very least a significantly lower sentence if the court still finds criminal liability.

1:58 The prosecution has taken the opposite view. Prosecutor Stirler henriks Boe said that he had already anticipated that the Supreme Court might lower the sentencing level and that this has already been factored into the sentence they requested in Howibi's case. He has also argued that the Supreme Court ruling does not resolve these central factual questions in this trial, especially where the issue is not just whether there had been intimacy before, but whether there was consent in the specific moment being charged. So what this means is not that Hoibi case suddenly got easier to predict. If anything, it became more complicated. The legal benchmark has moved, but the factual disputes remained exactly where they were. The court still has to decide what happened, what Hoibi understood, and what the women involved were actually capable of consenting to in those moments. Only after that comes to the question of punishment, and in some ways this is where the story has started to change in Norway. During the trial, much of the focus was understandably on witnesses, evidence, text messages, recordings and charges themselves. But now what the trial is over and the country waits for the verdict, the converse is widening out. It is no longer just about what happened in the courtroom. It is about what the case says about the culture around it that includes the media. One of the more interesting reactions came not from the royal beat or the legal commentators, but from inside the Norwegian press itself. In a media industry interview, VJI editor guard Stayro said the trial did not become the circus many feared.

3:25 That is a telling phrase because it acknowledges something everyone in Norway already knew going in. This was always going to be one of the most intensely watched criminal trials in the country in years. The son of the Crown princess, facing dozens of charges, seven weeks in open court and a huge international press presence, there was every reason to think this could spin completely out of control. STEREO's point is that the actual courtroom process often remained more sober than the headlines around it. The fear had been that the case would become pure spectacle. Instead, what Norway got was something more uncomfortable and in some ways more difficult, a prolonged, granular public examination of private behavior, consent, status, power and mail violence. Actor and director Mars Sugar Peterson spent all seven weeks in Oslow District Court following the Hoiby trial, not as a journalist and not as a legal observant, but as research for a stage production inspired by the current crisis surrounding the royal family. Peterson's takeaway was not really about royalty at all. It was about men.

4:26 He said that after following the case, that the central mistake would be to treat Weeby simply as some uniquely terrible individual and leave it there. In his view, that lets everyone else off the hook. He argues, the more difficult question is whether the case forces Norwegian men to examine what kinds of attitudes, habits and assumptions have been normalized for far too long. His most blunt line was probably the one that got the most attention. Stop watching porn, he said, not because he was trying to be provocative for the sake of it, but because he argues pornography shapes how many young men understand sex, women, power, and entitlement. He said it contributes to the objectification of women and effects not just sexual behavior, but the way men think more generally. Peterson's argument is that Norways should not be satisfied with identifying one defendant and calling it today. He said that if Hoyby is convicted, then the problem cannot be understood as belonging to one man alone. In essence, his point is that if this behavior is criminal, then there are far more men who need to take a long look at themselves. More crown and controversy in just a moment. If you haven't checked out our sister podcast, Pallace Intrigue Presents King William, here's what you need to know.

5:42 It's our speculative fiction series imagining what happens when williams ends the throne, and season two is out right now. This season, the Monarchy faces its biggest threat yet when a bombshell memoir announcement out of California forces King William and Queen Catherine to make a decision no royal fan family has ever faced. Does the Queen Starter podcast to fight back. All ten episodes of season two are available right now to Binge completely add free on Apple podcasts, just top that banner that says uninterrupted listening and dive in. Palace Intrigue Presents King William. Season two is available wherever you get your podcasts just like this one. Just search for King William Palace Intrigue Presents. Throughout the seven week trial, one of the most recognizable visual records of the case did not come from photographs or television cameras, but from the work of courtroom artists Aida Vikdal. Vicdal was hired by VEG to cover the proceedings from inside the courtroom, where cameras are not allowed once quarters in session. Over the course of the case, she produced one hundred and eighty one drawings across twenty seven days, creating what became for many Norwegians the difining images of the trial. She described the work as both demanding and relentless, saying I expected the job to be exciting and intense. Both were absolutely true. She added that even someone who loves drawing becomes exhausted doing it for that many hours and days in a row. Vid Canal also said she was caught off guard by how much attention these sketches received, especially after her very first courtroom drawing began circulating online and

7:16 quickly turned into memes by comedians and social media users. She called the reaction surreal. What makes that role so unusual, she explained, is the balance it requires. My job is not to judge the case, only to draw what I see. She said that means working quickly enough to capture the moment while also avoiding exaggeration or distortion. She said the challenge was often practical as much as artistic. The witness might suddenly appear, someone might leave the room before its schedule, was finished, or a new development might force her to abandon one drawing and begin another. In a case this large, she was often juggling multiple images at once and they you have it. She had to email us addresses The Palace Intrigue at gmail dot com. Please follows on Spotify, Apple or the Apple of your chays. I'm Mark Francis My thanks to John McDermott. This is ground and controversy in Norway