Feb. 11, 2026

Norway Trial: Woman Tells Court She Woke to Sex as Høiby Denies Assault

Norway Trial: Woman Tells Court She Woke to Sex as Høiby Denies Assault

A woman from Lofoten gives closed-door testimony in Oslo District Court, alleging she woke to Marius Borg Høiby having sex with her while she was asleep during a trip in October 2023.

Prosecutors say smartwatch data and a short video found on Høiby’s phone support claims she was unconscious, while the defence insists the encounter was consensual. Høiby, testifying under medication and visible strain, denies ever having sex with a sleeping partner as the trial continues to intensify pressure on Norway’s royal family.

Content warning on today's episode.

Portions of this program were assembled with the assistance of AI, including help with translation, summarisation, and news gathering from publicly available sources. While we have taken care to reflect the reporting accurately, translations and interpretations may contain errors. Listeners should treat this as an informational overview, not a verbatim court record.

Unlock an ad-free podcast experience with Caloroga Shark Media! Get all our shows on any player you love, hassle free! For Apple users, hit the banner on your Apple podcasts app. For Spotify or other players, visit caloroga.com/plus. No plug-ins needed!

Subscribe now for exclusive shows like 'Palace Intrigue,' and get bonus content from Deep Crown (our exclusive Palace Insider!) Or get 'Daily Comedy News,' and '5 Good News Stories’ with no commercials! Plans start at $4.99 per month, or save 20% with a yearly plan at $49.99. Join today and help support the show!


We now have Merch!  FREE SHIPPING! Check out all the products like T-shirts, mugs, bags, jackets and more with logos and slogans from your favorite shows! Did we mention there’s free shipping? Get 10% off with code NewMerch10 Go to Caloroga.com


Get more info from


WEBVTT

1
00:00:03.200 --> 00:00:10.800
Calaruga, Shark Media at Low and Welcome to Crown and

2
00:00:10.839 --> 00:00:16.440
Controversy Norway By'm Your Palace Intrigue host Mark Francis. Note

3
00:00:16.519 --> 00:00:20.800
today's episode has graphic descriptions of an alleged assault. In

4
00:00:20.839 --> 00:00:24.559
testimony given behind closed doors at Oslo District Court, a

5
00:00:24.600 --> 00:00:27.839
woman from Loeferton described the night she spent with Marius

6
00:00:27.879 --> 00:00:31.839
Boorghebi in October twenty twenty three, alleging that she woke

7
00:00:31.879 --> 00:00:34.200
to him having sex with her while she was asleep.

8
00:00:34.600 --> 00:00:37.719
According to the indictment, police believe a rape occurred in

9
00:00:38.000 --> 00:00:41.359
Hennings Fire during the night of Sunday, October eighth, twenty

10
00:00:41.439 --> 00:00:45.880
twenty three. Prosecutors alleged the woman was subjected to intercourse

11
00:00:45.880 --> 00:00:50.079
while unable to resist because she was not awake. Hoiby

12
00:00:50.119 --> 00:00:52.759
denies the charge, as well as three additional counts of

13
00:00:52.840 --> 00:00:56.679
rape without intercourse involving other women. The woman told the

14
00:00:56.719 --> 00:00:58.759
court that earlier in the nights, she and Hoeby had

15
00:00:58.920 --> 00:01:02.719
consensual sex several times. She says she was very tired

16
00:01:02.759 --> 00:01:05.560
and eventually fell asleep. She testified that she later woke

17
00:01:05.599 --> 00:01:09.799
in shock, experiencing pain, and realized intercourse was already under way.

18
00:01:10.480 --> 00:01:14.359
She described feeling detached, saying she disappeared from herself and

19
00:01:14.400 --> 00:01:17.000
that when she became fully aware again, it was over.

20
00:01:18.040 --> 00:01:20.239
That's always been my worst nightmare, she told the court,

21
00:01:20.319 --> 00:01:22.439
recalling how she closed her eyes so I wouldn't have

22
00:01:22.480 --> 00:01:25.680
to take part in my own assault. I remember waking

23
00:01:25.760 --> 00:01:28.840
up when he was already underwey. I thought, I don't

24
00:01:28.920 --> 00:01:31.319
understand how someone can have sex with someone who's sleeping.

25
00:01:32.000 --> 00:01:35.000
Then I mostly had the feeling I was disassociating, leaving

26
00:01:35.040 --> 00:01:38.359
my own body. It was painful. My body wasn't ready

27
00:01:38.400 --> 00:01:41.079
for it. After the account of the woman wrote a

28
00:01:41.079 --> 00:01:43.599
private note on her phone, which was later presented in court.

29
00:01:43.920 --> 00:01:46.480
In it, she described the night as nice and cozy,

30
00:01:46.719 --> 00:01:50.519
mentioned receiving compliments, estimated they had sex for several hours,

31
00:01:50.799 --> 00:01:54.200
and rated aspects of the night using star emojis. In court,

32
00:01:54.560 --> 00:01:57.200
she said the note functioned as a personal diary and

33
00:01:57.239 --> 00:02:00.000
that she had repressed what she now believes wasn't the solt,

34
00:02:00.280 --> 00:02:03.599
not fully understanding at the time what had happened. She

35
00:02:03.680 --> 00:02:05.519
told the court she did not include in the note

36
00:02:05.519 --> 00:02:07.840
that she woke to intercourse because she had pushed those

37
00:02:07.879 --> 00:02:10.919
details away and did not want to repeatedly confront them.

38
00:02:11.400 --> 00:02:14.599
She said she only later understood the situation as an

39
00:02:14.599 --> 00:02:17.639
assault after discussing it with a counselor who helped her

40
00:02:17.680 --> 00:02:22.639
put words to the experience. The defense challenged inconsistencies between

41
00:02:22.639 --> 00:02:26.840
her earlier police interviews and her courtroom testimony, questioning whether

42
00:02:26.879 --> 00:02:29.479
the final act was involuntary and noting that she did

43
00:02:29.479 --> 00:02:33.199
not verbally object at the time. The woman responded that

44
00:02:33.240 --> 00:02:35.560
she did not say she wanted sex either, and that

45
00:02:35.599 --> 00:02:40.280
a sleeping person gives no indication of consent. Prosecutors also

46
00:02:40.319 --> 00:02:43.479
presented a five second video found on Hoybe's phone, allegedly

47
00:02:43.479 --> 00:02:47.280
filmed without the woman's knowledge, and pulse data from a

48
00:02:47.319 --> 00:02:50.120
smart watch she was wearing. The video was shown to

49
00:02:50.159 --> 00:02:52.560
the court but not to the press. The woman said

50
00:02:52.599 --> 00:02:55.039
she recognized herself in the footage but found it distressing

51
00:02:55.039 --> 00:02:59.520
to see. Prosecutors further presented data from the woman's fitness watch,

52
00:02:59.680 --> 00:03:01.759
arguing it supports their claim that she was asleep at

53
00:03:01.800 --> 00:03:04.800
the time of the alleged assault. According to the prosecution,

54
00:03:05.280 --> 00:03:07.800
the change in heart rate is the most decisive factor,

55
00:03:07.919 --> 00:03:12.759
said the state prosecutor. During the proceedings, the defenses rejected

56
00:03:12.800 --> 00:03:16.000
all rape allegations, maintaining that the encounters in question were

57
00:03:16.000 --> 00:03:21.759
perfectly normal and consensual sexual relations more in just a moment.

58
00:03:25.159 --> 00:03:28.360
In his testimony on Tuesday, Marius Borg Hoibe told the

59
00:03:28.400 --> 00:03:31.400
court he is still medicated, explaining that this, combined with

60
00:03:31.439 --> 00:03:34.240
the strain of the proceedings, may affect how clearly he

61
00:03:34.360 --> 00:03:37.879
is able to speak. He described the situation as extremely

62
00:03:37.919 --> 00:03:40.360
uncomfortable and said the atmosphere in the court room was

63
00:03:40.560 --> 00:03:44.960
nerve racking, asking for understanding if his answers occasionally became disjointed.

64
00:03:45.520 --> 00:03:48.680
Oiby also gave new contacts for the Loferton trip itself,

65
00:03:49.039 --> 00:03:51.240
telling the courty came after a period of heavy party

66
00:03:51.400 --> 00:03:55.039
and substance use. He said Crown Prince Harken wanted to

67
00:03:55.039 --> 00:03:57.879
get him out of Oslo and suggested the trip, citing

68
00:03:57.879 --> 00:04:01.800
there shared interest in surfing. According to Hoibe, the invitation

69
00:04:01.960 --> 00:04:05.120
was direct, now we're going on a trip. Describing his

70
00:04:05.199 --> 00:04:08.599
first interactions with the woman he met via tinder, Weiby

71
00:04:08.639 --> 00:04:10.560
said she was very sweet and that the tone between

72
00:04:10.560 --> 00:04:13.560
them was pleasant. He told the court that she was,

73
00:04:13.639 --> 00:04:16.600
in his view, more sexually forward than he was accustomed to,

74
00:04:16.839 --> 00:04:20.000
though he stressed that this did not make him uncomfortable.

75
00:04:20.439 --> 00:04:23.800
He maintained that the sexual encounters that followed were consensual

76
00:04:24.000 --> 00:04:27.839
and said he had no reason to believe otherwise. During questioning,

77
00:04:28.199 --> 00:04:31.680
Hoyby appeared increasingly irritated as the prosecution pressed him on

78
00:04:31.720 --> 00:04:36.240
the distinction between memory and assumption, particularly concerning whether the

79
00:04:36.279 --> 00:04:39.560
woman was awake during the final encounter. He repeated that

80
00:04:39.600 --> 00:04:41.439
he has never had sex with someone who was sleeping

81
00:04:41.480 --> 00:04:43.920
and said this is not something he has ever done.

82
00:04:44.079 --> 00:04:47.040
At several points he sought eye contact with his defense

83
00:04:47.079 --> 00:04:51.040
team as the questioning became more detailed. The court also

84
00:04:51.079 --> 00:04:53.800
heard further discussions of messages Hoiby sent to three friends

85
00:04:53.800 --> 00:04:56.279
in the early hours of the morning, shortly before the

86
00:04:56.319 --> 00:05:00.439
filming alleged in the indictment. While the existence and timing

87
00:05:00.480 --> 00:05:03.240
of the messages were already known, they were described in

88
00:05:03.279 --> 00:05:06.959
court as having a notably hard tone. After several hours

89
00:05:06.959 --> 00:05:09.800
in the witness box, Hoyeby asked for a pause, telling

90
00:05:09.839 --> 00:05:12.839
the court he was becoming very tired. With prosecutors indicating

91
00:05:12.920 --> 00:05:16.959
they would need additional time, the judge adjourned proceedings at

92
00:05:16.959 --> 00:05:19.959
three point thirty seven pm. Hoiby is scheduled to return

93
00:05:20.000 --> 00:05:24.199
to the witness box when the trial resumes earlier. Hoyby's

94
00:05:24.240 --> 00:05:27.240
defense team supported ending the session, with observers noting that

95
00:05:27.279 --> 00:05:31.240
he appeared visibly exhausted, at one point, holding his forehead

96
00:05:31.399 --> 00:05:35.959
and closing his eyes. During questioning, the state prosecutor examined

97
00:05:35.959 --> 00:05:38.800
Hoebe's relationship status at the time of the alleged incident

98
00:05:38.839 --> 00:05:42.360
in Lofferton. The court was shown message exchanges between Hoiby

99
00:05:42.439 --> 00:05:45.079
and two friends sent between four and five a m.

100
00:05:45.399 --> 00:05:48.160
On the night in question, messages that had also been

101
00:05:48.160 --> 00:05:52.040
discussed in court the previous week. Asked about fidelity, Hoibe

102
00:05:52.120 --> 00:05:54.079
told the court he is extremely jealous and said he

103
00:05:54.120 --> 00:05:56.439
did not see a difference between himself or a former

104
00:05:56.480 --> 00:06:00.879
partner being with someone else. The prosecutor also questioned Hoybe

105
00:06:00.959 --> 00:06:03.920
on whether it is acceptable to wake a sexual partner

106
00:06:03.959 --> 00:06:07.759
by initiating sexual activity. Hoiby responded that while he does

107
00:06:07.800 --> 00:06:10.480
not believe it is acceptable to wake someone by having

108
00:06:10.519 --> 00:06:12.360
sex with them, he does not see a problem with

109
00:06:12.399 --> 00:06:16.000
waking someone through physical affection after consensual sex has already occurred.

110
00:06:16.439 --> 00:06:19.040
He denied the alleged victims claim that he had already

111
00:06:19.079 --> 00:06:22.879
penetrated her when she woke during the final encounter, stating

112
00:06:22.920 --> 00:06:25.120
that he had received no indication that the situation was

113
00:06:25.160 --> 00:06:28.680
anything other than positive. The prosecutor pressed further on this point,

114
00:06:29.040 --> 00:06:31.680
asking whether Hoybe believed it was acceptable to wake the

115
00:06:31.720 --> 00:06:35.120
woman by touching her breasts and genitals. Hoibi replied that

116
00:06:35.120 --> 00:06:37.120
he assumed she would wake as he touched her, and

117
00:06:37.160 --> 00:06:40.079
denied touching her while she was sleeping. He also stated

118
00:06:40.120 --> 00:06:42.600
that on another occasion, he had woken her by touching

119
00:06:42.600 --> 00:06:46.399
her shoulder. During this line of questioning, Hoybe was observed

120
00:06:46.399 --> 00:06:49.319
placing a small, pre packed pouch of moist tobacco in

121
00:06:49.319 --> 00:06:54.040
his mouth while continuing to answer questions. The prosecutor then

122
00:06:54.079 --> 00:06:56.560
turned to the five second video recorded on Hoibe's phone

123
00:06:56.560 --> 00:07:00.279
showing the woman's genital area. Weiby confirmed that the hand

124
00:07:00.319 --> 00:07:02.360
seen in the video was his, but said he could

125
00:07:02.360 --> 00:07:04.360
not remember when the recording was made or what its

126
00:07:04.399 --> 00:07:06.959
purpose was. He told the court it was impossible to

127
00:07:07.000 --> 00:07:09.879
determine from the video whether the woman was asleep, but

128
00:07:09.959 --> 00:07:12.439
maintained that she was awake and repeated that he did

129
00:07:12.480 --> 00:07:15.439
not engage in any sexual activity while she was sleeping.

130
00:07:16.480 --> 00:07:19.759
Throughout Hoybe's testimony, the alleged victims sat approximately four meters

131
00:07:19.800 --> 00:07:22.040
away and did not look at him, instead keeping her

132
00:07:22.040 --> 00:07:27.000
eyes down. Her legal counsel followed the testimony closely. When

133
00:07:27.079 --> 00:07:30.600
questioned about inconsistencies and gaps in his recollection of the night,

134
00:07:30.800 --> 00:07:34.079
Loiby said he struggled to distinguish between what he remembered

135
00:07:34.079 --> 00:07:37.600
personally and what he had later read or been told.

136
00:07:39.120 --> 00:07:42.199
Portions of this program were assembled with the assistance of AI,

137
00:07:42.319 --> 00:07:46.800
including help with translations, summarizations, and news gathering from publicly

138
00:07:46.800 --> 00:07:50.800
available sources. While we've taken care to reflect the reporting accurately,

139
00:07:50.920 --> 00:07:55.319
translations and interpretations may contain errors. Listeners should treat this

140
00:07:55.360 --> 00:07:59.439
as an informational overview, not a verbatian court record. Nothing

141
00:07:59.439 --> 00:08:02.199
in this program should be considered a factual finding or

142
00:08:02.360 --> 00:08:06.240
legal determination. And there you have it. Reflect the email

143
00:08:06.319 --> 00:08:09.240
us who addresses the Palace intrig at gmail dot com.

144
00:08:09.240 --> 00:08:11.519
Please follow us on Spotify, Apple or the app of

145
00:08:11.560 --> 00:08:15.000
your choice, or even on Facebook and Instagram. I'm Mark

146
00:08:15.040 --> 00:08:17.199
Francis my thanks to John McDermott. This is Crown and

147
00:08:17.199 --> 00:08:19.959
Controversy Norway. Good terms,