March 23, 2026

Norway Royals Visit Høiby in Prison as Epstein Email Questions Grow

Norway Royals Visit Høiby in Prison as Epstein Email Questions Grow
Apple Podcasts podcast player iconSpotify podcast player icon
Apple Podcasts podcast player iconSpotify podcast player icon

Crown Prince Haakon and Crown Princess Mette-Marit were seen arriving at Oslo Prison alongside Prince Sverre Magnus, just days after the trial of Marius Borg Høiby concluded. While prison visits are routine, the timing and visibility of this one have drawn significant attention, reading as a clear show of support as the family awaits a verdict expected in early June.

We break down where the case stands now, including the charges, the prosecution’s sentencing request, and the growing debate over Norway’s legal framework, with critics questioning what one commentator called a “quantity discount” for serious crimes.

At the same time, scrutiny has returned to Crown Princess Mette-Marit’s past contact with Jeffrey Epstein. A newly discussed detail from the Palace — that the email account in question was compromised and no longer exists — adds another layer to an already sensitive issue.
With the trial complete but the outcome still unknown, the royal family finds itself navigating both a legal pause and a very active public conversation.


Portions of this program were assembled with the assistance of AI, including help with translation, summarisation, and news gathering from publicly available sources. While we have taken care to reflect the reporting accurately, translations and interpretations may contain errors. Listeners should treat this as an informational overview, not a verbatim court record.

Unlock an ad-free podcast experience with Caloroga Shark Media! Get all our shows on any player you love, hassle free! For Apple users, hit the banner on your Apple podcasts app. For Spotify or other players, visit caloroga.com/plus. No plug-ins needed!

Subscribe now for exclusive shows like 'Palace Intrigue,' and get bonus content from Deep Crown (our exclusive Palace Insider!) Or get 'Daily Comedy News,' and '5 Good News Stories’ with no commercials! Plans start at $4.99 per month, or save 20% with a yearly plan at $49.99. Join today and help support the show!


We now have Merch! FREE SHIPPING! Check out all the products like T-shirts, mugs, bags, jackets and more with logos and slogans from your favorite shows! Did we mention there’s free shipping? Get 10% off with code NewMerch10 Go to Caloroga.com


Get more info from


WEBVTT

1
00:00:03.200 --> 00:00:12.839
Calarogu shark Media, Hello and welcome to Crown and Controversy Norway.

2
00:00:13.000 --> 00:00:17.440
I am your palace, intrigued host Mark Francis. On Sunday afternoon,

3
00:00:17.519 --> 00:00:21.920
Crown Prince Harken and Crown Princess Madamrie were seen arriving

4
00:00:21.960 --> 00:00:25.359
at Oslo Prison, where Marius borg Hoibi is currently being

5
00:00:25.359 --> 00:00:28.879
held in pre trial detention. In the backseat of the

6
00:00:28.879 --> 00:00:33.000
car was Prince Svere Magnus, who had only recently returned

7
00:00:33.119 --> 00:00:36.840
to Norway after spending time abroad. The timing of his

8
00:00:36.960 --> 00:00:39.719
return and his presence in the car made the moment

9
00:00:39.799 --> 00:00:43.640
feel even more deliberate. The visit itself is not unusual

10
00:00:43.679 --> 00:00:47.399
in a procedural sense. Prison regulations allow inmates to receive

11
00:00:47.960 --> 00:00:51.399
visitors up to twice a week, and family members routinely

12
00:00:51.399 --> 00:00:55.200
take advantage of that. What makes this different is the visibility.

13
00:00:55.759 --> 00:00:59.320
The arrival was photographed, widely circulated and quickly became part

14
00:00:59.359 --> 00:01:03.679
of the broad public narrative surrounding the case. The Royal

15
00:01:03.719 --> 00:01:09.079
Palace declined to comment, with Communications Chief Uri Vape reiterating

16
00:01:09.159 --> 00:01:13.319
they do not discuss the Crown Prince couple's private life.

17
00:01:13.760 --> 00:01:16.319
That position is consistent with past practice, but it does

18
00:01:16.400 --> 00:01:19.680
little to change how moments like this are received. When

19
00:01:19.680 --> 00:01:22.519
a royal couple is seen entering a prison just days

20
00:01:22.560 --> 00:01:26.680
after a high profile trial has concluded, the images speak

21
00:01:26.719 --> 00:01:30.719
for themselves. The timing is what gives the visit its weight.

22
00:01:30.959 --> 00:01:33.799
The trial against hoybe wrapped on Thursday after more than

23
00:01:33.840 --> 00:01:36.359
six weeks in court, and the case is now in

24
00:01:36.400 --> 00:01:39.200
the hands of the judges. A verdict is expected in

25
00:01:39.280 --> 00:01:41.959
early June. That places the family in a kind of

26
00:01:42.040 --> 00:01:46.120
holding pattern, with the legal process paused but public attention

27
00:01:46.280 --> 00:01:50.640
very much intact. This visit, coming immediately after the proceedings ended,

28
00:01:51.120 --> 00:01:53.879
reads as a clear show of support the moment when

29
00:01:53.879 --> 00:01:57.719
the outcome is still uncertain. At the same time, the

30
00:01:57.719 --> 00:02:00.680
Crown Princess has been dealing with a separate line of scrutiny,

31
00:02:00.680 --> 00:02:02.879
one that reaches back more than a decade but has

32
00:02:02.920 --> 00:02:08.039
resurfaced with new intensity. In a recent interview with NRK Meta,

33
00:02:08.080 --> 00:02:10.800
Marie was asked about her past contact with Jeffrey Epstein,

34
00:02:10.960 --> 00:02:14.560
including a twenty eleven email in which she wrote, I

35
00:02:14.680 --> 00:02:18.000
googled you after your last email. I agree, it didn't

36
00:02:18.039 --> 00:02:21.599
look so good. The quote has circulated widely, in part

37
00:02:21.639 --> 00:02:23.879
because of its casual tone, and in part because of

38
00:02:23.919 --> 00:02:27.879
what it suggests about her awareness at the time. Following

39
00:02:27.919 --> 00:02:30.840
the interview, the Royal Palace issued a clarification that added

40
00:02:30.879 --> 00:02:33.439
a new layer to the story. They stated that the

41
00:02:33.479 --> 00:02:37.120
email account in question no longer exists, explaining that both

42
00:02:37.159 --> 00:02:40.000
the accounts and its password were leaked in twenty twelve.

43
00:02:40.520 --> 00:02:42.960
As a result, the Crown Princess no longer has access

44
00:02:43.000 --> 00:02:47.199
to those emails and they cannot be retrieved. That clarification

45
00:02:47.319 --> 00:02:50.479
does not change the fact that the correspondence existed, but

46
00:02:50.560 --> 00:02:54.199
it does effectively close off the possibility of further review.

47
00:02:54.800 --> 00:02:57.800
At a moment when attention is returned to those exchanges,

48
00:02:58.120 --> 00:03:00.479
the Palace is making clear that there is no archive

49
00:03:00.599 --> 00:03:05.120
to revisit. In the same interview, Metamory offered some explanation

50
00:03:05.199 --> 00:03:08.280
for her relative silence on the issue in recent weeks,

51
00:03:08.319 --> 00:03:10.759
saying she is the mother of a young man who

52
00:03:10.759 --> 00:03:13.560
has been in a very demanding situation. It is a

53
00:03:13.599 --> 00:03:15.840
line that ties the two strands of the story together,

54
00:03:16.039 --> 00:03:19.759
the past controversy in the present crisis, and underscores how

55
00:03:19.800 --> 00:03:23.800
closely they are now intertwined. While the Royal family has

56
00:03:23.800 --> 00:03:26.159
limited what it is willing to say publicly, the broader

57
00:03:26.199 --> 00:03:29.479
conversation has not slowed down, If anything, it has shifted.

58
00:03:30.280 --> 00:03:33.199
With the trial now concluded, attention has turned to the

59
00:03:33.280 --> 00:03:36.280
question of sentencing, and that is where a new debate

60
00:03:36.319 --> 00:03:40.000
has begun to take shape. Marius borg Hoibi faces a

61
00:03:40.000 --> 00:03:43.919
wide ranging set of charges covering thirty eight alleged incidents

62
00:03:43.919 --> 00:03:48.000
involving seven individuals. The charges include multiple allegations of rape,

63
00:03:48.039 --> 00:03:51.319
as well as violence, threats, drug offenses, violations of a

64
00:03:51.439 --> 00:03:55.400
restraining order, and traffic related offenses. He has admitted partial

65
00:03:55.479 --> 00:03:59.159
guilt in some areas, including offenses involving one individual and

66
00:03:59.240 --> 00:04:03.039
several lessons charges, but denies the most serious allegations, including

67
00:04:03.159 --> 00:04:07.039
the rape charges. During closing arguments, prosecutors laid out a

68
00:04:07.120 --> 00:04:10.400
detailed framework for how they believe the court should approach sentencing.

69
00:04:10.879 --> 00:04:14.520
They assigned individual penalties to specific incidents, with some of

70
00:04:14.560 --> 00:04:18.839
the most serious allegations carrying suggested sentences of several years each.

71
00:04:19.160 --> 00:04:22.120
When those figures are added together, the total exceeds fourteen years.

72
00:04:22.639 --> 00:04:26.120
Despite that, the prosecution ultimately requested a combined sentence of

73
00:04:26.240 --> 00:04:29.360
seven years and seven months. The reason lies in how

74
00:04:29.879 --> 00:04:34.279
Norwegian sentencing works. Rather than simply stacking penalties for each offense.

75
00:04:34.360 --> 00:04:36.639
The system takes the most serious crime as a starting

76
00:04:36.680 --> 00:04:39.480
point and then adds time for the remaining offenses in

77
00:04:39.519 --> 00:04:42.680
a more limited way. It is a structured approach and

78
00:04:42.759 --> 00:04:46.040
one that is well established in law. In a published

79
00:04:46.160 --> 00:04:49.279
opinion piece, one commentator laid out the numbers and questioned

80
00:04:49.399 --> 00:04:52.800
the result, writing this implies, in other words, a quantity

81
00:04:52.879 --> 00:04:56.800
discount on very serious crimes such as rape phrasing is blunt,

82
00:04:56.800 --> 00:05:00.959
but it reflects a reaction that is not limited to one.

83
00:05:01.199 --> 00:05:03.279
The same piece went on to draw a comparison with

84
00:05:03.319 --> 00:05:06.680
other areas of law, asking where is the logic in

85
00:05:06.720 --> 00:05:10.879
increasing punishment for repeated speeding offenses but granting discount for rapes.

86
00:05:11.600 --> 00:05:14.000
It is a question framed in simple terms, but it

87
00:05:14.040 --> 00:05:18.839
speaks to a broader tension between legal principles and public expectations.

88
00:05:19.439 --> 00:05:23.120
The judges are expected to deliver their verdict in early June,

89
00:05:23.279 --> 00:05:26.160
and until then the story sits in kind of a pause,

90
00:05:26.360 --> 00:05:29.839
not resolved but not advancing in a formal sense. Either

91
00:05:30.360 --> 00:05:33.959
will continue to check in as events warrant, and there

92
00:05:33.959 --> 00:05:35.639
you have it. If you'd like to email us or

93
00:05:35.639 --> 00:05:38.959
addresses the Palace Intrigue at gmail dot com, please follow

94
00:05:39.000 --> 00:05:41.319
us Spotify, Apple or the app of your choice. I

95
00:05:41.399 --> 00:05:44.199
Mark Francis my thanks to John McDermott. This is ground

96
00:05:44.279 --> 00:05:46.319
and controversy Norway