Feb. 19, 2026

New Complainant Testifies in Oslo: Hotel Videos, Alleged Filming While Asleep, and Høiby Delays His Account

New Complainant Testifies in Oslo: Hotel Videos, Alleged Filming While Asleep, and Høiby Delays His Account
Apple Podcasts podcast player iconSpotify podcast player icon
Apple Podcasts podcast player iconSpotify podcast player icon

Day ten of the trial of Marius Borg Høiby brought powerful testimony from a new complainant who alleges she was assaulted at a Forenom apart-hotel in Oslo in November 2024. She told the court the evening began with a flirtatious after-party atmosphere following an Aqua concert but ended in fear, confusion and panic. Both sides agree there was consensual sex shortly after arriving at the hotel. The dispute centers on what happened after she says she told him she wanted to sleep.

The woman testified that she woke repeatedly to being touched while asleep and described seeing what she believed was a camera flash before he lowered his phone. Prosecutors say investigators recovered 27 videos and four still images tied to the incident, recorded across two separate time blocks. S

ome recordings reportedly show her appearing awake, others motionless. She told the court she never consented to being filmed and never consented to sexual activity while asleep, stating clearly: “We had no agreement that he could film me or touch me while I was sleeping.”

Høiby, who denies criminal guilt in this and the other rape allegations, was expected to begin his explanation of the hotel incident but told the judge he was too tired and would wait until today. His account is now one of the key anticipated moments in the proceedings.

Portions of this program were assembled with the assistance of AI, including help with translation, summarisation, and news gathering from publicly available sources. While we have taken care to reflect the reporting accurately, translations and interpretations may contain errors. Listeners should treat this as an informational overview, not a verbatim court record.

Unlock an ad-free podcast experience with Caloroga Shark Media! Get all our shows on any player you love, hassle free! For Apple users, hit the banner on your Apple podcasts app. For Spotify or other players, visit caloroga.com/plus. No plug-ins needed!

Subscribe now for exclusive shows like 'Palace Intrigue,' and get bonus content from Deep Crown (our exclusive Palace Insider!) Or get 'Daily Comedy News,' and '5 Good News Stories’ with no commercials! Plans start at $4.99 per month, or save 20% with a yearly plan at $49.99. Join today and help support the show!


We now have Merch! FREE SHIPPING! Check out all the products like T-shirts, mugs, bags, jackets and more with logos and slogans from your favorite shows! Did we mention there’s free shipping? Get 10% off with code NewMerch10 Go to Caloroga.com


Get more info from


WEBVTT

1
00:00:03.200 --> 00:00:12.960
Calarogu Shark Media. Hello and welcome to Crown and Controversy Norway.

2
00:00:13.160 --> 00:00:16.519
I am your Palace Intrigue host to Mark Francis. The

3
00:00:16.559 --> 00:00:18.679
tenth day of the trial brought the testimony of a

4
00:00:18.719 --> 00:00:22.480
new complainant, the woman who prosecutors say was assaulted at

5
00:00:22.480 --> 00:00:25.399
a Fornham apartment hotel in Oslo in November of twenty

6
00:00:25.440 --> 00:00:28.559
twenty four. From the witness box, she described a night

7
00:00:28.600 --> 00:00:32.240
that began with what she called a flirtatious atmosphere and ended,

8
00:00:32.320 --> 00:00:36.159
in her words, in fear, confusion and panic. She told

9
00:00:36.159 --> 00:00:38.280
the court she had traveled to Oslo for an aqua

10
00:00:38.359 --> 00:00:41.600
concert and met Marius borg Hoiby at an after party

11
00:00:42.119 --> 00:00:45.399
shortly before midnight. She described drinking games what she called

12
00:00:45.439 --> 00:00:47.799
an ex on the beach vibes, in a mood where

13
00:00:48.200 --> 00:00:51.479
people were trying to outdo each other. She placed herself

14
00:00:51.520 --> 00:00:54.679
at seven to eight on a ten point intoxication scale,

15
00:00:54.679 --> 00:00:57.880
and said she saw Hoybe use cocaine several times during

16
00:00:57.880 --> 00:01:02.079
the evening. Telecommunications data presented by police shows the pair

17
00:01:02.200 --> 00:01:04.640
arriving at her hotel around four thirty. She said the

18
00:01:04.680 --> 00:01:07.959
atmosphere changed immediately. She told the court she had been

19
00:01:07.959 --> 00:01:10.719
open to consensual sex, and that they did have sex

20
00:01:10.760 --> 00:01:13.879
shortly after arriving, but that she quickly became exhausted and

21
00:01:13.920 --> 00:01:17.280
told him she wanted to sleep. What she described next

22
00:01:17.439 --> 00:01:20.079
forms the core of the charge. She said she woke

23
00:01:20.159 --> 00:01:23.200
repeatedly to what she believed was him touching her while

24
00:01:23.239 --> 00:01:25.920
she slept. At one point, she told the court she

25
00:01:25.959 --> 00:01:28.480
felt what she described as a blow to her genitals,

26
00:01:28.599 --> 00:01:30.799
woke up and saw what she believed was a camera

27
00:01:30.840 --> 00:01:34.480
flash before he lowered his phone. Asked how she felt,

28
00:01:34.519 --> 00:01:37.879
she answered, very uncomfortable. I was afraid. When the prosecutor

29
00:01:37.879 --> 00:01:39.799
asked whether she believed he had heard her say she

30
00:01:39.840 --> 00:01:43.280
wanted to sleep, she replied, he heard it. She told

31
00:01:43.280 --> 00:01:45.200
the court she felt herself becoming more passive as this

32
00:01:45.280 --> 00:01:49.319
situation continued. He would never finish, he wouldn't stop, she said.

33
00:01:49.840 --> 00:01:52.640
She described pretending to remain asleep as he got dressed

34
00:01:52.640 --> 00:01:55.640
to leave, waiting until the door closed before reacting, and

35
00:01:55.640 --> 00:02:00.280
then experiencing what she called panic. The court was told

36
00:02:00.280 --> 00:02:03.159
that investigators have recovered twenty seven videos and four still

37
00:02:03.239 --> 00:02:06.599
images connected to the hotel incident. According to the prosecution,

38
00:02:07.079 --> 00:02:10.159
some show her apparently awake and participating while others show

39
00:02:10.199 --> 00:02:14.439
her lying motionless. The recordings were made during two separate periods,

40
00:02:14.800 --> 00:02:18.960
between five seventeen and six thirty nine, and again around

41
00:02:19.000 --> 00:02:23.080
eleven eighteen. Several hours later. The woman told the court

42
00:02:23.120 --> 00:02:25.879
she had believed at most a couple of recordings existed

43
00:02:26.000 --> 00:02:27.639
and went into the shock when she saw how many

44
00:02:27.680 --> 00:02:31.840
there were during her police interview. The timeline around the

45
00:02:31.879 --> 00:02:34.520
hotel incident is also becoming a key issue for the prosecution.

46
00:02:34.960 --> 00:02:38.000
According to the state prosecutor, this alleged assault took place

47
00:02:38.000 --> 00:02:41.599
in early November twenty twenty four, after Marius borg Hoibi

48
00:02:41.639 --> 00:02:44.360
had already been formally charged in the wider case, and

49
00:02:44.439 --> 00:02:46.520
during the same period he is accused of breaching the

50
00:02:46.520 --> 00:02:50.479
restraining order connected to the Frogner woman. The court heard

51
00:02:50.479 --> 00:02:52.280
that the woman had come to Oslo on a girl's

52
00:02:52.280 --> 00:02:54.599
trip and was invited to an after party by a

53
00:02:54.639 --> 00:02:59.879
well known reality television personality via Snapchat. She told the

54
00:03:00.039 --> 00:03:02.159
court that when she arrived only two people were there,

55
00:03:02.360 --> 00:03:06.120
the TV personality and Hoiby. During drinking games, she said,

56
00:03:06.159 --> 00:03:08.400
Hoyby asked to see photos of her to assess whether

57
00:03:08.439 --> 00:03:11.639
she had potential to earn money on only fans, and

58
00:03:11.680 --> 00:03:14.080
at one point began pulling down her top. She said

59
00:03:14.080 --> 00:03:16.319
she did not explicitly agree, but also did not stop

60
00:03:16.360 --> 00:03:18.280
him because she wanted to take part in the game.

61
00:03:18.840 --> 00:03:22.120
She also described behavior she found striking throughout the night,

62
00:03:22.560 --> 00:03:25.280
that he repeatedly checked her mobile phone to make sure

63
00:03:25.280 --> 00:03:28.759
she had not taken pictures or video of him, and

64
00:03:28.800 --> 00:03:30.879
when asked how she believed he had taken cocaine at

65
00:03:30.919 --> 00:03:33.680
the party, she gave a very specific answer because he

66
00:03:33.719 --> 00:03:35.960
had a Louis Vuitton wallat with a small spoon inside

67
00:03:36.000 --> 00:03:39.439
that he used. Back in court, the digital evidence was

68
00:03:39.479 --> 00:03:42.120
again laid out in precise time blocks. The prosecutor said

69
00:03:42.120 --> 00:03:45.759
there are fourteen videos and three images recorded over one

70
00:03:45.759 --> 00:03:48.680
hour and twenty one minutes, followed by a gap, and

71
00:03:48.680 --> 00:03:51.680
then a further thirteen videos and one image just after

72
00:03:51.759 --> 00:03:55.159
eleven eighteen in the morning. The woman repeated that she

73
00:03:55.199 --> 00:03:57.800
had consensual sex at first, but that she never agreed

74
00:03:57.840 --> 00:04:00.120
to being filmed and never consented to any set to

75
00:04:00.199 --> 00:04:03.800
activity while she was asleep. She also described the moment

76
00:04:03.840 --> 00:04:06.120
he left the room. She told the court she pretended

77
00:04:06.120 --> 00:04:08.319
to stay asleep because she did not want to speak

78
00:04:08.319 --> 00:04:10.919
to him, and then when the door closed, she jumped

79
00:04:10.960 --> 00:04:13.080
up in panic. Because she was afraid he had taken

80
00:04:13.080 --> 00:04:16.199
her phone. She later found it hidden under a pillow

81
00:04:16.199 --> 00:04:19.000
behind the curtain. In a detail that would now become

82
00:04:19.040 --> 00:04:21.160
important for the defense case, she said a man who

83
00:04:21.160 --> 00:04:23.839
had been in custody with Hoyby told her he had

84
00:04:23.839 --> 00:04:29.000
boasted about filming her while she slept. Unlike other complainants,

85
00:04:29.000 --> 00:04:32.160
she was not initially identified by investigators. She told the

86
00:04:32.199 --> 00:04:35.199
court she came forward herself after reading in the media

87
00:04:35.240 --> 00:04:38.319
that image and video material had been found in the case.

88
00:04:38.879 --> 00:04:41.439
She sent an anonymous tip if there was something from

89
00:04:41.439 --> 00:04:44.920
that night, it could be me. Police then asked her

90
00:04:44.959 --> 00:04:47.680
to photograph her hands and tattoos to compare with the material,

91
00:04:47.680 --> 00:04:50.319
and called her in for questioning. She said seeing the

92
00:04:50.360 --> 00:04:53.720
recordings left her disoriented and described the period afterward as

93
00:04:53.959 --> 00:04:57.319
completely hellish. She also told the court she later met

94
00:04:57.319 --> 00:04:59.800
a man who said he had been in custody with

95
00:04:59.879 --> 00:05:02.319
her Hoyby, and claimed Toeby had boasted about filming her

96
00:05:02.360 --> 00:05:06.040
while she slapped. The man has not testified, and, according

97
00:05:06.040 --> 00:05:08.000
to her, did not want to get involved because he

98
00:05:08.079 --> 00:05:11.079
was afraid both of the police and of Hoibi. She

99
00:05:11.120 --> 00:05:13.120
told the court she believed that fear was connected to

100
00:05:13.120 --> 00:05:15.720
his status he is a certain type of power because

101
00:05:15.759 --> 00:05:20.519
of who he is. During cross examination, the defense focused

102
00:05:20.519 --> 00:05:23.360
on the timeline of her own understanding of events. She

103
00:05:23.399 --> 00:05:25.879
said she did not fully define it as an assault

104
00:05:25.959 --> 00:05:28.319
until she was in the police interview and saw the recordings.

105
00:05:28.600 --> 00:05:30.800
I didn't want to define it that way, she told

106
00:05:30.800 --> 00:05:35.240
the court. Marius Boorg Hoibi denies criminal guilt for this charge,

107
00:05:35.279 --> 00:05:37.879
as he does for the other rape allegations. Both sides

108
00:05:37.920 --> 00:05:40.519
agree there was consensual sex at the beginning of the encounter.

109
00:05:41.079 --> 00:05:43.519
The dispute is over what happened after she said she

110
00:05:43.600 --> 00:05:46.800
wanted to sleep, and whether she was capable of consenting

111
00:05:48.040 --> 00:05:54.480
more crown and controversy in just a moment. Hoibi had

112
00:05:54.480 --> 00:05:56.839
been expected to begin his own explanation of the hotel

113
00:05:56.879 --> 00:05:59.160
incident today, but when the judge asked whether he was

114
00:05:59.199 --> 00:06:02.000
ready to start, he applied, I am very tired and

115
00:06:02.000 --> 00:06:05.160
would like to wait until tomorrow. His full version of

116
00:06:05.199 --> 00:06:08.199
events now becomes one of the key moments for today's session.

117
00:06:08.759 --> 00:06:11.639
In the meantime, the cross examination of the complainant moved

118
00:06:11.639 --> 00:06:14.879
into new territory, with the defense focusing heavily on what

119
00:06:14.959 --> 00:06:18.120
happened the day after the alleged assault. The court heard

120
00:06:18.160 --> 00:06:20.759
that she went on a Tinder date that same evening

121
00:06:21.199 --> 00:06:24.800
and confirmed under questioning that the meeting ended in consensual sex.

122
00:06:25.240 --> 00:06:27.199
She also later met the friend she had been with

123
00:06:27.319 --> 00:06:31.160
at the after party the night before. The defense then

124
00:06:31.199 --> 00:06:33.959
read from her original police interview where she had described

125
00:06:33.959 --> 00:06:36.600
the night with Hoybi as quote the adventure I was

126
00:06:36.639 --> 00:06:39.920
on last night. Hah asked in court whether it was

127
00:06:39.959 --> 00:06:42.839
correct that she had not yet taken in what had happened,

128
00:06:43.279 --> 00:06:46.040
she answered, I had not taken it in no. Pressed

129
00:06:46.079 --> 00:06:48.120
on why she did not react more strongly at the time,

130
00:06:48.199 --> 00:06:50.319
she told the court that when she woke up to

131
00:06:50.399 --> 00:06:54.519
him touching her, she froze and remained lying still. Why

132
00:06:54.800 --> 00:06:57.800
because they were scared, trunk and tired, she said. She

133
00:06:57.839 --> 00:06:59.680
also made clear that the fear was not because he

134
00:06:59.720 --> 00:07:02.120
had threatened her. The defense suggested that one of the

135
00:07:02.160 --> 00:07:05.240
videos showed her touching herself and asked whether that could

136
00:07:05.279 --> 00:07:09.079
be interpreted as an invitation to continue. Her answer was

137
00:07:09.079 --> 00:07:11.839
immediate no, After everything that had happened, that is not

138
00:07:11.920 --> 00:07:15.079
an invitation. She added that she does not remember doing it,

139
00:07:15.560 --> 00:07:17.600
and in one of the clearest consent lines of the day,

140
00:07:17.639 --> 00:07:19.959
she told the court we had no agreement that he

141
00:07:19.959 --> 00:07:22.360
could film me or touch me while I was sleeping.

142
00:07:23.800 --> 00:07:26.240
Portions of this program were assembled with the assistance of AI,

143
00:07:26.360 --> 00:07:30.279
including help with translations, summarizations, and news gathering from publicly

144
00:07:30.319 --> 00:07:34.360
available sources. We've taken care to reflect the reporting accurately.

145
00:07:34.480 --> 00:07:38.639
Translations and interpretations may contain errors. Listeners should treat this

146
00:07:38.680 --> 00:07:42.720
as an informational overview, not a verbatim court record. Nothing

147
00:07:42.759 --> 00:07:45.240
in this program should be considered a factual finding or

148
00:07:45.399 --> 00:07:49.040
legal determination. And they have it, and they have it.

149
00:07:49.040 --> 00:07:51.000
If you like to email us addresses the Palace entrig

150
00:07:51.040 --> 00:07:53.800
at gmail dot com. Please follow us on Spotify, Apple,

151
00:07:53.879 --> 00:07:55.680
or the app of your choice. I'm Mink Francis my

152
00:07:55.680 --> 00:08:02.879
thanks to John McDermott, Missus, Crown and Controversy Norway.