July 1, 2025

"JURY MELTDOWN: Rogue Juror Threatens to Derail Diddy Trial"

"JURY MELTDOWN: Rogue Juror Threatens to Derail Diddy Trial"

Disaster strikes just 70 minutes into deliberations as Juror 25 refuses to follow instructions, sending the Diddy trial into chaos. Reid Carter breaks down the shocking note from the jury foreperson expressing concern about the "wildcard" juror who could force a mistrial. Is this judicial misconduct, an attention-seeking scheme, or something worse? With a second problematic juror in two weeks, serious questions emerge about jury selection in this explosive case. Plus: What happens next and why this legal nightmare could gift Diddy's defense team the appeal they need.

To become a premium subscriber (no ads and no feed drops) visit caloroga.com/plus.   For Apple users, hit the banner on your Apple podcasts app which seays UNINTERRUPTED LISTENING. For Spotify or other players, visit caloroga.com/plus. You also get 25+ other shows on the network ad-free!   Go to Caloroga.com for all our shows!

Join the Celebrity Trials community on social media! We're building a passionate group of true crime enthusiasts who love diving deep into the most shocking cases in America.

Follow us on Facebook and Instagram by searching "Celebrity Trials Podcast" on either platform. You'll get exclusive behind-the-scenes content, breaking news updates on cases we're covering, and early alerts when new episodes drop. Our social media is where Reid Carter's hottest takes live, including reactions that don't make it into the show.


But more importantly, it's where YOU come in. Share your theories, debate the verdicts, and connect with fellow listeners who are just as obsessed with justice as you are. Did the jury get it right? What questions do you still have? Your comments and insights often shape future episodes.


We cover the trials that matter, but our community makes the conversation unforgettable. Come for Reid's signature cynical commentary, stay for the incredible discussions with thousands of true crime fans who get it.


WEBVTT

1
00:00:03.200 --> 00:00:12.279
Caalarogus Shark Media. Good morning, I'm read Carter, and welcome

2
00:00:12.320 --> 00:00:15.919
back to celebrity trials. If you thought the drama in

3
00:00:15.960 --> 00:00:19.239
the Sean Diddy Coombe's case was over after closing arguments,

4
00:00:19.559 --> 00:00:25.000
think again. Yesterday was supposed to be the beginning of

5
00:00:25.039 --> 00:00:30.199
the end, twelve jurors quietly deliberating behind closed doors, weighing

6
00:00:30.359 --> 00:00:33.479
seven weeks of explosive evidence to determine whether one of

7
00:00:33.560 --> 00:00:36.719
hip hop's most powerful figures spends the rest of his

8
00:00:36.840 --> 00:00:40.840
life in prison. Instead, we got chaos, We got a

9
00:00:40.920 --> 00:00:43.640
rogue juror, and we got a legal crisis that has

10
00:00:43.679 --> 00:00:47.359
everyone asking is this trial about to implode? Let me

11
00:00:47.439 --> 00:00:49.880
paint you the picture of what went down yesterday in

12
00:00:49.920 --> 00:00:53.240
that Manhattan Federal Courthouse, because what should have been a

13
00:00:53.320 --> 00:00:57.359
routine start to deliberations turned into a judicial nightmare that

14
00:00:57.399 --> 00:01:02.920
has legal experts scratching their heads. The day began normally enough.

15
00:01:03.479 --> 00:01:06.439
Judge r and Subramanian spent over two hours giving the

16
00:01:06.519 --> 00:01:11.439
jury their instructions, explaining the five charges, the legal standards,

17
00:01:11.760 --> 00:01:14.760
and the eight potential racketeering acts they needed to consider.

18
00:01:15.280 --> 00:01:18.879
The jury of eight men and four women looked serious, focused,

19
00:01:19.239 --> 00:01:22.400
ready to do their civic duty. Diddy's family was there,

20
00:01:22.920 --> 00:01:26.840
his mother, his children, holding hands and bowing their heads

21
00:01:26.840 --> 00:01:29.840
in prayer. As the jury was sent out to begin deliberations.

22
00:01:31.359 --> 00:01:34.439
Within the first hour, the jury selected Jurer number five

23
00:01:34.480 --> 00:01:38.480
as their four person standard procedure. Everything seemed to be

24
00:01:38.519 --> 00:01:42.760
going smoothly, and then the bomb dropped just seventy minutes

25
00:01:42.760 --> 00:01:46.879
into deliberations. Seventy minutes the four persons sent a note

26
00:01:46.879 --> 00:01:50.799
to Judge Subramanian that sent shockwaves through that courtroom. The

27
00:01:50.840 --> 00:01:55.439
note was simple but devastating. We have a juror number

28
00:01:55.560 --> 00:02:00.000
twenty five who we are concerned cannot follow your Honour's instructions.

29
00:02:01.120 --> 00:02:04.599
Let me tell you something, folks, in my years covering trials,

30
00:02:04.920 --> 00:02:08.439
I've never seen anything quite like this. Jury notes about

31
00:02:08.439 --> 00:02:12.039
problematic jurors usually come after days or weeks of deliberation,

32
00:02:12.560 --> 00:02:16.039
when tensions are high and people are exhausted. But an

33
00:02:16.080 --> 00:02:19.120
hour and ten minutes in, that's not a red flag,

34
00:02:19.560 --> 00:02:23.319
that's a five alarm fire. Juror number twenty five is

35
00:02:23.360 --> 00:02:26.560
a fifty one year old scientist who lives in Manhattan

36
00:02:26.599 --> 00:02:30.439
with his domestic partner, and, according to legal experts, the

37
00:02:30.520 --> 00:02:33.599
fact that his fellow jurors are already concerned about his

38
00:02:33.680 --> 00:02:37.960
ability to follow instructions, suggests something fundamentally wrong with how

39
00:02:37.960 --> 00:02:42.199
he's approaching this case. Alan Turkheimer, a jury consultant not

40
00:02:42.240 --> 00:02:46.319
affiliated with the case, called this development significant because it's

41
00:02:46.360 --> 00:02:50.360
happening so early in deliberations. This is a possible massive

42
00:02:50.400 --> 00:02:52.960
headache at this early stage of the game, he said,

43
00:02:53.319 --> 00:02:57.840
especially since Judge Subramanian already dismissed another juror earlier this month.

44
00:02:58.240 --> 00:03:01.800
And here's where this gets really interesting and really problematic

45
00:03:01.840 --> 00:03:05.919
for both sides. The four person didn't just say they

46
00:03:05.960 --> 00:03:09.319
were concerned. They specifically asked to speak with the judge

47
00:03:09.599 --> 00:03:12.879
or have juror twenty five interviewed. That tells me this

48
00:03:12.960 --> 00:03:16.479
isn't about a simple disagreement over evidence. This sounds like

49
00:03:16.520 --> 00:03:19.319
someone who fundamentally doesn't understand his role as a juror.

50
00:03:19.919 --> 00:03:23.879
Judge Subramanian's response was measured but telling. He sent back

51
00:03:23.879 --> 00:03:26.919
a note reminding every juror of their duty to deliberate

52
00:03:27.199 --> 00:03:30.080
and their obligation to follow his instructions on the law.

53
00:03:30.680 --> 00:03:34.360
He told them to continue deliberating, but behind the scenes,

54
00:03:34.479 --> 00:03:38.680
both legal teams were scrambling because everyone knows this situation

55
00:03:39.120 --> 00:03:42.879
is a ticking time bomb. The prosecution and defense spent

56
00:03:43.039 --> 00:03:46.240
hours huddling with the judge trying to figure out how

57
00:03:46.240 --> 00:03:50.000
to handle this mess. The government wanted firm language reminding

58
00:03:50.080 --> 00:03:53.639
jurors to stick to the law. The defense was more cautious,

59
00:03:54.039 --> 00:03:57.360
worried about appearing to pressure their way to a favorable outcome.

60
00:03:58.199 --> 00:04:01.159
But here's what really has me fired up about this situation.

61
00:04:01.639 --> 00:04:04.759
We've already been down this road with this jury. Remember

62
00:04:04.879 --> 00:04:07.599
juror number six, the one who was dismissed just two

63
00:04:07.639 --> 00:04:10.520
weeks ago for giving inconsistent information about where he lived.

64
00:04:11.199 --> 00:04:14.280
The defense fought hard to keep him, arguing that removing

65
00:04:14.280 --> 00:04:16.639
a black juror would hurt the diversity of the panel.

66
00:04:17.240 --> 00:04:20.480
Now we've got another potential juror removal, and I'm starting

67
00:04:20.519 --> 00:04:23.079
to wonder if there's something fundamentally wrong with how this

68
00:04:23.199 --> 00:04:28.959
jury was selected. Two problematic jurors out of twelve. That's

69
00:04:29.000 --> 00:04:33.319
not normal, that's not random. That suggests either incredibly bad

70
00:04:33.439 --> 00:04:37.000
luck or serious flaws in the vetting process. And the

71
00:04:37.040 --> 00:04:40.399
timing couldn't be worse for everyone involved. This isn't just

72
00:04:40.480 --> 00:04:43.680
any trial. This is the trial of the decade. The

73
00:04:43.720 --> 00:04:47.040
world is watching. Media outlets are lined up outside that

74
00:04:47.160 --> 00:04:50.040
courthouse waiting for a verdict, and now we've got a

75
00:04:50.040 --> 00:04:54.000
potential mistrial brewing because one juror apparently can't or won't

76
00:04:54.120 --> 00:04:57.360
do his job. I'll be back in just a moment

77
00:04:57.439 --> 00:05:07.519
to tell you what I really think is happening. Let

78
00:05:07.600 --> 00:05:09.360
me tell you what I think is really happening here,

79
00:05:09.399 --> 00:05:14.480
because this situation is absolutely infuriating from every angle. First,

80
00:05:14.639 --> 00:05:17.480
let's talk about Juror twenty five himself. What kind of

81
00:05:17.480 --> 00:05:20.360
person makes it through jury selection, sits through seven weeks

82
00:05:20.360 --> 00:05:23.680
of testimony, listens to closing arguments, and then suddenly can't

83
00:05:23.680 --> 00:05:28.079
follow basic instructions. Either this guy fundamentally misunderstood what being

84
00:05:28.160 --> 00:05:31.639
a juror means, or and this is what really worries me,

85
00:05:32.279 --> 00:05:35.879
he's got some kind of agenda. Think about it. This

86
00:05:35.959 --> 00:05:40.160
is a high profile case with massive media attention. We've

87
00:05:40.199 --> 00:05:42.439
already seen how people try to get on juries in

88
00:05:42.480 --> 00:05:46.279
celebrity cases for their own reasons. Maybe Juror twenty five

89
00:05:46.360 --> 00:05:49.040
thought he could be the holdout who forces a hung jury.

90
00:05:49.639 --> 00:05:52.160
Maybe he wanted to be the guy who single handedly

91
00:05:52.279 --> 00:05:56.120
saves or destroys Diddy. Maybe he just wanted his fifteen

92
00:05:56.160 --> 00:05:59.319
minutes of fame. But here's what really gets me. This

93
00:05:59.360 --> 00:06:02.959
puts the entire trial at risk. We've had seven weeks

94
00:06:03.000 --> 00:06:07.240
of testimony from thirty four witnesses. We've seen explicit videos,

95
00:06:07.959 --> 00:06:12.040
heard devastating recordings, watched grown adults break down on the

96
00:06:12.079 --> 00:06:16.040
stand describing years of abuse, and now one rogue juror

97
00:06:16.079 --> 00:06:20.040
could potentially torpedo the whole thing. The defense has to

98
00:06:20.040 --> 00:06:23.000
be secretly thrilled about this chaos, even though they can't

99
00:06:23.040 --> 00:06:27.279
say it publicly. Any irregularity in jury deliberations gives them

100
00:06:27.319 --> 00:06:31.040
grounds for appeal. If there's a conviction, they're probably already

101
00:06:31.120 --> 00:06:34.279
drafting their appellate briefs about how their client was denied

102
00:06:34.319 --> 00:06:38.240
a fair trial because of jury misconduct. But the prosecution,

103
00:06:39.160 --> 00:06:42.319
they have to be absolutely livid. They've built what appears

104
00:06:42.360 --> 00:06:45.480
to be an airtight case with overwhelming evidence, and now

105
00:06:45.480 --> 00:06:48.439
they're dealing with jury drama that could undermine everything they've

106
00:06:48.439 --> 00:06:52.199
worked for. And Judge Subramanian is caught in an impossible position.

107
00:06:53.240 --> 00:06:56.759
If he removes Jurer twenty five, the defense will scream

108
00:06:56.800 --> 00:07:00.639
about judicial bias and jury tampering. If he keeps him,

109
00:07:01.000 --> 00:07:03.680
and the guy continues to be disruptive, he risks a

110
00:07:03.759 --> 00:07:07.519
hung jury or grounds for appeal. Either way, he's potentially

111
00:07:07.560 --> 00:07:12.680
looking at months or years of additional litigation. Here's my prediction,

112
00:07:13.120 --> 00:07:15.959
Judge Supermanian is going to try to manage this situation

113
00:07:16.079 --> 00:07:20.199
with minimal intervention. He'll send more stern instructions, maybe bring

114
00:07:20.240 --> 00:07:23.079
the jury back for additional guidance, and hope that peer

115
00:07:23.120 --> 00:07:26.120
pressure from the other eleven jurors forces Juror twenty five

116
00:07:26.160 --> 00:07:29.120
to get in line. But if this guy continues to

117
00:07:29.160 --> 00:07:32.439
be a problem, if he's refusing to deliberate in good

118
00:07:32.480 --> 00:07:35.600
faith or trying to be some kind of judicial activist,

119
00:07:36.120 --> 00:07:38.639
the judge is going to have no choice but to

120
00:07:38.720 --> 00:07:43.319
remove him and bring in an alternate. The wild card

121
00:07:43.399 --> 00:07:47.079
here is how this affects the actual deliberations. Are the

122
00:07:47.120 --> 00:07:50.839
other jurors so frustrated with Jurer twenty five that they're

123
00:07:50.839 --> 00:07:54.439
not able to focus on the evidence. Is this disruption

124
00:07:54.600 --> 00:07:58.680
preventing them from having meaningful discussions about Diddy's guilt or innocence?

125
00:07:59.439 --> 00:08:02.720
And let's not forget this jury still has to work together.

126
00:08:03.399 --> 00:08:05.920
They've got to go back into that room, try to

127
00:08:05.920 --> 00:08:10.120
put this drama aside and somehow reach a unanimous verdict

128
00:08:10.160 --> 00:08:14.279
on five serious felony charges. That's a tall order under

129
00:08:14.319 --> 00:08:18.480
normal circumstances. With this kind of dysfunction, it could be

130
00:08:18.560 --> 00:08:21.759
nearly impossible. The jury was sent home for the day

131
00:08:21.879 --> 00:08:25.480
yesterday with no verdict and presumably no resolution to the

132
00:08:25.600 --> 00:08:29.920
Juror twenty five problem. They're expected to return to deliberations

133
00:08:29.920 --> 00:08:32.720
this morning, but who knows what kind of atmosphere they're

134
00:08:32.720 --> 00:08:37.879
walking into. Judge Supermanian has several options. He could bring

135
00:08:37.919 --> 00:08:41.600
the entire jury back for additional instructions. He could interview

136
00:08:41.720 --> 00:08:45.759
Juror twenty five privately to determine if he's capable of continuing.

137
00:08:46.159 --> 00:08:48.799
He could remove him and bring in an alternate. Or

138
00:08:48.879 --> 00:08:51.720
he could declare a mistrial and start this whole circus

139
00:08:51.759 --> 00:08:55.000
over again. None of these options are good. All of

140
00:08:55.039 --> 00:08:59.440
them create delays, complications, and potential grounds for appeal. But

141
00:08:59.519 --> 00:09:01.879
that's what happens when you've got a rogue juror who

142
00:09:01.960 --> 00:09:05.799
apparently thinks the rules don't apply to him. Make sure

143
00:09:05.840 --> 00:09:09.519
you're subscribed and have those notifications turned on, because when

144
00:09:09.519 --> 00:09:13.159
this situation gets resolved, and when we eventually get a verdict,

145
00:09:13.440 --> 00:09:16.360
you'll hear it here first. This case has been full

146
00:09:16.399 --> 00:09:20.000
of surprises from day one, and clearly we're not done yet.

147
00:09:20.360 --> 00:09:24.360
I'm read Carter. Sometimes justice is blind, sometimes it's riveting,

148
00:09:24.440 --> 00:09:31.399
and sometimes, like yesterday, it's just plain messy.