Welcome to Celebrity Trials - True Crime and Justice coverage updated daily.!
Sept. 16, 2026

He Didn't Ask a Single Question on Day One of His Own Capital Trial, and the Question a Hawaii Judge Refused to Ask His Jury

He Didn't Ask a Single Question on Day One of His Own Capital Trial, and the Question a Hawaii Judge Refused to Ask His Jury

Tomasz Kosowski, representing himself in a capital murder trial in Pinellas County, Florida, gave no opening statement and cross-examined none of the state's witnesses on the first day. Assistant State Attorney Alexandra Spadaro told Judge Joseph Bulone that attorney Steven Cozzi, 41, was killed in his firm's bathroom and moved out by wagon — that "his coffin was a dumpster" and his remains lie in the Collier County landfill, where a three-day search found nothing. Kosowski has pleaded not guilty and is presumed innocent; he has dismissed four sets of attorneys, waived a jury for both phases, and withdrawn his prior counsel's suppression motions and death-penalty challenges. Also: in Honolulu, Judge Paul Wong recalled the jurors who convicted Dr. Gerhardt Konig of attempted manslaughter, but limited questioning to whether any had outside contact during deliberations — declining to ask whether the panel was ever unanimous on intent to kill, despite a sworn affidavit from the foreperson saying it was not. Nine jurors answered no; three more are questioned September 18. And disqualification motions are pending in Idaho, where Bryan Kohberger seeks to withdraw his guilty plea, and in Florida, where Rashaun Jones has filed a fourth.

Join our new FB groups page here. Take the poll!

Join the Daily Crime & Justice community on social media! We're building a passionate group of true crime enthusiasts who love diving deep into the most shocking cases in America.
Follow us on Facebook and Instagram by searching "Daily Crime & Justice" on either platform.


You'll get exclusive behind-the-scenes content, breaking news updates on cases we're covering, and early alerts when new episodes drop. Our social media is where Garret Fisher's hottest takes live, including reactions that don't make it into the show.

But more importantly, it's where YOU come in. Share your theories, debate the verdicts, and connect with fellow listeners who are just as obsessed with justice as you are. Did the jury get it right? What questions do you still have? Your comments and insights often shape future episodes.


We cover the trials that matter, but our community makes the conversation unforgettable. Come for Garret's signature cynical commentary, stay for the incredible discussions with thousands of true crime fans who get it.

WEBVTT

1
00:00:03.250 --> 00:00:11.710
Calaroga Shark Media. Good morning. This is Daily Crime and

2
00:00:11.789 --> 00:00:16.429
Justice from Calaroga Media, powered by AI. I'm Garrett Fisher.

3
00:00:16.710 --> 00:00:22.429
It's Wednesday, September 16th, 2026. Today is about one question

4
00:00:22.789 --> 00:00:27.949
asked three different ways. Who actually gets to decide? In Largo, Florida,

5
00:00:28.149 --> 00:00:31.910
a plastic surgeon is on trial for his life, representing himself.

6
00:00:32.759 --> 00:00:35.750
On day one, the state laid out its case, and

7
00:00:35.789 --> 00:00:37.890
when it was his turn to give an opening statement,

8
00:00:38.189 --> 00:00:40.409
he did not give one. When it was his turn

9
00:00:40.429 --> 00:00:44.350
to cross-examine the state's witnesses, he did not cross-examine any

10
00:00:44.390 --> 00:00:48.049
of them. In Honolulu, a judge did order an entire

11
00:00:48.130 --> 00:00:51.179
jury back into his courtroom over the objection of both

12
00:00:51.219 --> 00:00:55.479
the prosecution and the defense. And then, when they got there,

13
00:00:55.799 --> 00:00:58.179
he refused to ask them the question the defense most

14
00:00:58.219 --> 00:01:02.250
wanted answered. That refusal is the story. And it lines

15
00:01:02.329 --> 00:01:05.950
up exactly with something that happened in Plymouth, Massachusetts three

16
00:01:05.989 --> 00:01:09.670
weeks ago. And in Idaho and in Florida, two defendants

17
00:01:09.709 --> 00:01:11.790
are trying to get rid of their judges. One of

18
00:01:11.829 --> 00:01:14.790
them has already pleaded guilty to four murders. The other

19
00:01:14.870 --> 00:01:22.250
is on his fourth attempt. Let's get into it. Stephen

20
00:01:22.290 --> 00:01:25.510
Kazi was 41 years old. He was an attorney at

21
00:01:25.549 --> 00:01:28.140
a firm in Largo, Florida. He was married to a

22
00:01:28.170 --> 00:01:34.099
man named Michael Montgomery. On the morning of March 21st, 2023,

23
00:01:34.099 --> 00:01:38.659
Kazi had a telephonic court hearing scheduled. Tomasz Kosawski called

24
00:01:38.700 --> 00:01:43.519
into that hearing. Stephen Kazi did not. Minutes before, surveillance

25
00:01:43.560 --> 00:01:46.859
video had recorded a gray Toyota Tundra pulling into the

26
00:01:46.900 --> 00:01:50.680
parking lot outside Kazi's office. Later that day, co-workers went

27
00:01:50.700 --> 00:01:54.079
looking for him. They went into the communal bathroom. According

28
00:01:54.120 --> 00:01:58.040
to prosecutors, they found blood everywhere. Yesterday, three and a

29
00:01:58.060 --> 00:02:02.019
half years later, the trial began. And Assistant State Attorney

30
00:02:02.180 --> 00:02:05.379
Alexandra Spadaro gave an opening statement that I am still

31
00:02:05.420 --> 00:02:09.400
thinking about. She told Judge Joseph Ballone that Stephen Causey

32
00:02:09.439 --> 00:02:12.460
did not disappear on his own terms, that he was

33
00:02:12.580 --> 00:02:15.419
murdered in the bathroom of his law firm, that his

34
00:02:15.500 --> 00:02:17.659
body was placed in a wagon and dragged to the

35
00:02:17.699 --> 00:02:21.039
parking lot and loaded into a truck. And then she

36
00:02:21.099 --> 00:02:25.060
said this, that his coffin was a dumpster, his hearse

37
00:02:25.189 --> 00:02:28.469
was a dump truck. and his burial site, where he

38
00:02:28.509 --> 00:02:32.990
lies in tiny, unidentifiable pieces, is the Collier County landfill.

39
00:02:33.780 --> 00:02:37.099
Investigators searched that landfill for three days. They did not

40
00:02:37.180 --> 00:02:40.199
find him. The state's theory is that this began with

41
00:02:40.240 --> 00:02:44.419
a lawsuit. Kosowski filed a civil case in 2019 over

42
00:02:44.500 --> 00:02:49.949
medical billing. Cozy represented people Kosowski was suing. Kosowski represented

43
00:02:49.969 --> 00:02:52.469
himself in that case, and Spadaro told the court he

44
00:02:52.509 --> 00:02:56.159
made it contentious and he made it personal. particularly between

45
00:02:56.219 --> 00:02:59.930
himself and Stephen Kazi. She told the judge that cell

46
00:02:59.939 --> 00:03:03.189
phone data shows Kasowski's phone connecting to the law firm's

47
00:03:03.229 --> 00:03:06.270
wireless network on days when he had no reason to

48
00:03:06.310 --> 00:03:09.289
be on that property. And she said that in the

49
00:03:09.330 --> 00:03:13.430
weeks before Kazi disappeared, the firm's maintenance woman reported finding

50
00:03:13.469 --> 00:03:16.129
a man peeking through the law firm's window and then

51
00:03:16.210 --> 00:03:19.610
hiding in a dark utility closet wearing a surgical mask.

52
00:03:20.469 --> 00:03:23.840
When Kosowski was arrested days later, police say they found

53
00:03:23.960 --> 00:03:27.300
in his car a ballistic vest with Stephen Causey's blood

54
00:03:27.379 --> 00:03:32.520
on it, duct tape, a paralyzing agent, syringes with sedatives,

55
00:03:32.939 --> 00:03:39.620
brass knuckles, a taser, two passports, and roughly $ 280, 000 in cash.

56
00:03:40.280 --> 00:03:43.960
Prosecutors called it a murder bag. They also said he

57
00:03:44.000 --> 00:03:47.219
had injuries consistent with a struggle. All of that is

58
00:03:47.259 --> 00:03:51.539
the state's allegation. Tomasz Kosowski has pleaded not guilty and

59
00:03:51.580 --> 00:03:54.060
he is presumed innocent. And not one word of it

60
00:03:54.099 --> 00:03:57.599
has been proven. And here's what he did about it yesterday. Nothing.

61
00:03:57.979 --> 00:04:02.250
He gave no opening statement. Prosecutors then called their first witnesses,

62
00:04:02.469 --> 00:04:06.590
including Kozy's husband and his friends and his colleagues, several

63
00:04:06.629 --> 00:04:09.789
of whom testified about finding blood in that bathroom and

64
00:04:09.849 --> 00:04:14.879
immediately thinking of one name. Tomasz Kosowski cross-examined none of them.

65
00:04:15.370 --> 00:04:18.509
Not one question to any witness on the first day

66
00:04:18.550 --> 00:04:20.589
of a trial in which the state of Florida is

67
00:04:20.750 --> 00:04:24.230
asking for his execution. I want to be careful here

68
00:04:24.410 --> 00:04:27.290
because there is a version of this that is strategy.

69
00:04:27.939 --> 00:04:31.300
A self-represented defendant who cross-examines the grieving husband of a

70
00:04:31.319 --> 00:04:34.699
murder victim can do himself enormous damage, and in a

71
00:04:34.740 --> 00:04:38.079
bench trial there is no jury to perform for. A

72
00:04:38.120 --> 00:04:42.089
lawyer might reasonably decide to let emotional witnesses pass untouched

73
00:04:42.209 --> 00:04:45.730
and save the fight for the forensic testimony. That is

74
00:04:45.790 --> 00:04:48.310
a real tactic and I am not going to pretend

75
00:04:48.350 --> 00:04:51.009
it is not. But put it next to everything else.

76
00:04:51.350 --> 00:04:54.189
He fired four sets of attorneys. He refused to sign

77
00:04:54.230 --> 00:04:57.500
consent forms for a doctor's evaluation. He told his own

78
00:04:57.540 --> 00:05:00.379
lawyer he did not want evidence presented in his defense.

79
00:05:01.100 --> 00:05:04.660
He withdrew the motions to suppress. He withdrew every objection

80
00:05:04.699 --> 00:05:08.019
to the death penalty. He waived a jury for both phases.

81
00:05:08.420 --> 00:05:10.480
He has said he does not intend to present any

82
00:05:10.519 --> 00:05:13.779
mitigation at all if there is a penalty phase. And

83
00:05:13.879 --> 00:05:16.180
now he has sat through the first day of his

84
00:05:16.379 --> 00:05:20.490
own capital murder trial in silence. I said Monday, I'm

85
00:05:20.529 --> 00:05:23.449
not a doctor and I am not diagnosing anybody. And

86
00:05:23.490 --> 00:05:25.730
a judge who has watched this man for three years

87
00:05:25.790 --> 00:05:28.670
has found him competent. And that judge knows more than

88
00:05:28.810 --> 00:05:32.290
I do. All of that is still true. It is

89
00:05:32.470 --> 00:05:34.970
also true that the state is presenting a murder case

90
00:05:35.009 --> 00:05:38.100
to a single human being and the defendant is not

91
00:05:38.160 --> 00:05:42.120
contesting any of it. One structural note about how this

92
00:05:42.160 --> 00:05:45.420
trial is running, because it explains the pace. There is

93
00:05:45.480 --> 00:05:48.180
no jury, so there is nobody to excuse from the

94
00:05:48.220 --> 00:05:52.240
room when the lawyers argue. There was no jury selection,

95
00:05:52.399 --> 00:05:55.139
which in a capital case can take weeks on its own.

96
00:05:55.779 --> 00:05:58.920
There are no instructions to draft at the end. Objections

97
00:05:58.959 --> 00:06:01.319
get made and ruled on in front of the only

98
00:06:01.379 --> 00:06:04.180
person who matters, which is the same person ruling on them.

99
00:06:05.029 --> 00:06:08.889
And because Kosowski withdrew the suppression motions, there is no

100
00:06:09.009 --> 00:06:12.750
fight about what comes in. Essentially, everything the state has

101
00:06:12.810 --> 00:06:15.439
is going in. That is why a case that took

102
00:06:15.500 --> 00:06:17.519
three and a half years to reach trial may be

103
00:06:17.680 --> 00:06:20.980
over in a matter of days. Court resumed yesterday morning

104
00:06:21.019 --> 00:06:24.699
at 9.15. We will be on it again tomorrow. Stephen

105
00:06:24.740 --> 00:06:28.000
Kazi was 41. He went to work, he stepped away

106
00:06:28.019 --> 00:06:30.519
from his desk, and his husband has spent three and

107
00:06:30.560 --> 00:06:33.670
a half years without a body to bury. Someone has

108
00:06:33.709 --> 00:06:37.339
to say his name. When we come back, a judge

109
00:06:37.500 --> 00:06:40.500
orders a whole jury back into court, and both sides

110
00:06:40.579 --> 00:06:55.850
beg him not to. On March 24th, 2025, Gerhard Koenig

111
00:06:55.889 --> 00:06:58.860
and his wife Arielle went hiking on the Palipuka Trail

112
00:06:59.040 --> 00:07:02.959
on Oahu. It was her birthday. Their marriage was in trouble,

113
00:07:03.060 --> 00:07:05.819
and the trip was, at least partly, an attempt to

114
00:07:05.870 --> 00:07:08.889
salvage it. What happened on that ridge is disputed in

115
00:07:08.949 --> 00:07:12.810
almost every particular. Both of them testified. Each said the

116
00:07:12.870 --> 00:07:15.750
other started it. Prosecutors said he tried to push her

117
00:07:15.889 --> 00:07:19.129
off the cliff, and when that failed, tried to inject

118
00:07:19.189 --> 00:07:21.990
her with a syringe and beat her head with a rock.

119
00:07:22.769 --> 00:07:25.610
Prosecutor Joel Garner told the jury the only thing that

120
00:07:25.649 --> 00:07:28.509
stopped him was being caught red-handed when two hikers came

121
00:07:28.600 --> 00:07:33.240
upon them. Koenig, a Maui anesthesiologist, admitted hitting his wife

122
00:07:33.279 --> 00:07:36.019
in the head with a rock, but testified he was

123
00:07:36.240 --> 00:07:39.220
acting in self-defense, and that she was the one who

124
00:07:39.300 --> 00:07:43.319
attacked him. On April 8th, after more than eight hours

125
00:07:43.379 --> 00:07:47.540
of deliberation, the jury acquitted him of attempted second-degree murder.

126
00:07:48.339 --> 00:07:52.550
They convicted him instead of a lesser charge, attempted manslaughter

127
00:07:52.579 --> 00:07:56.870
based on extreme mental or emotional disturbance. He faces up

128
00:07:56.930 --> 00:08:00.230
to 20 years. He has been held without bond ever since,

129
00:08:00.370 --> 00:08:02.930
and his sentencing has been postponed while all of this

130
00:08:02.990 --> 00:08:06.910
plays out. And then, immediately after the verdict, two of

131
00:08:06.970 --> 00:08:12.160
those jurors gave interviews to the press. The foreperson, Makalapua Atkins,

132
00:08:12.519 --> 00:08:15.040
said the jury convicted on the lesser charge because they

133
00:08:15.079 --> 00:08:17.639
did not feel the evidence would support that he intended

134
00:08:17.699 --> 00:08:21.060
to murder her. In one interview, she put it this way,

135
00:08:21.420 --> 00:08:23.660
the intent to kill is improbable to us based on

136
00:08:23.699 --> 00:08:27.819
the evidence presented. A second juror, identified publicly only as

137
00:08:27.870 --> 00:08:32.350
juror number three, said the same thing. Koenig's attorney, Thomas Otake,

138
00:08:32.409 --> 00:08:34.450
took that and built a motion for a new trial

139
00:08:34.590 --> 00:08:38.289
on two separate claims. The first is about the verdict itself.

140
00:08:38.649 --> 00:08:42.980
Otake argues that under Hawaii law, even attempted manslaughter requires

141
00:08:43.039 --> 00:08:47.019
a finding that the defendant intended to kill. Extreme emotional

142
00:08:47.059 --> 00:08:50.350
disturbance mitigates the offense. It does not erase the element

143
00:08:50.370 --> 00:08:53.379
of intent. So if the jurors are saying publicly they

144
00:08:53.440 --> 00:08:57.000
never unanimously found that, the verdict rests on something the

145
00:08:57.059 --> 00:09:01.049
jury did not actually decide. Atkins went further and signed

146
00:09:01.110 --> 00:09:05.370
a sworn affidavit saying exactly that. The second claim is

147
00:09:05.450 --> 00:09:08.470
different in kind. During the trial on the Law and

148
00:09:08.509 --> 00:09:12.110
Crime livestream, an anonymous commenter claimed to be text messaging

149
00:09:12.149 --> 00:09:15.360
with a juror during deliberations. I want you to hold

150
00:09:15.460 --> 00:09:17.480
on to that for a second because I will come

151
00:09:17.539 --> 00:09:20.700
back to it. Last month, Judge Paul Wong held a

152
00:09:20.720 --> 00:09:22.919
hearing on all of it, and he made a decision

153
00:09:22.940 --> 00:09:26.629
that surprised everybody. Rather than rule, he said he had

154
00:09:26.669 --> 00:09:29.850
to hear from the jurors themselves. He cited a Hawaii

155
00:09:29.870 --> 00:09:33.789
Supreme Court decision requiring further inquiry. He said the court

156
00:09:33.850 --> 00:09:36.789
must ascertain the extent of the influence, and that the

157
00:09:36.909 --> 00:09:39.580
burden was on him. He also said he had to

158
00:09:39.639 --> 00:09:42.340
do something he really did not want to do. Both

159
00:09:42.399 --> 00:09:45.500
sides opposed it. The defense said its motion was strong

160
00:09:45.539 --> 00:09:49.990
enough without dragging jurors back. The prosecution said questioning them

161
00:09:50.049 --> 00:09:54.399
would violate the rules protecting deliberations. He ordered them back anyway,

162
00:09:54.659 --> 00:09:58.549
for September 11th. And here is what actually happened when

163
00:09:58.570 --> 00:10:01.200
they got there, which is the part almost every account

164
00:10:01.259 --> 00:10:04.620
is glossed over. Judge Wong told the courtroom he would

165
00:10:04.779 --> 00:10:08.259
ask the jurors one thing only, whether any of them

166
00:10:08.320 --> 00:10:11.879
communicated with an outsider about the deliberations or the verdict.

167
00:10:12.440 --> 00:10:15.740
Nothing else. He said the questioning was being done very

168
00:10:15.799 --> 00:10:18.279
much out of an abundance of caution given the state

169
00:10:18.320 --> 00:10:21.039
of the record. Otake asked him to put on the

170
00:10:21.120 --> 00:10:23.799
record why he would not allow the second line of questioning,

171
00:10:24.000 --> 00:10:27.340
the one about whether the panel was ever unanimous on intent.

172
00:10:28.100 --> 00:10:30.879
And Wong confirmed it. He would not ask the jurors

173
00:10:30.919 --> 00:10:34.120
about their unanimity. He would not ask them about intent.

174
00:10:34.899 --> 00:10:39.080
He cited Hawaii's evidentiary rule barring inquiry into jurors' internal

175
00:10:39.139 --> 00:10:42.679
reasoning and the state Supreme Court's decision in Rickapore Hall

176
00:10:42.779 --> 00:10:47.129
against Philip Morris. Otake noted his objection and pointed out

177
00:10:47.149 --> 00:10:50.250
that even the prosecution had conceded parts of the foreperson's

178
00:10:50.350 --> 00:10:54.730
affidavit were not barred by that rule. Deputy Prosecuting Attorney

179
00:10:54.769 --> 00:10:57.840
Joel Garner's position was simpler. He said they did not

180
00:10:57.879 --> 00:11:01.259
want to turn it into a fishing expedition. Nine jurors

181
00:11:01.299 --> 00:11:04.480
were present. Three could not attend, one of them not

182
00:11:04.519 --> 00:11:07.080
even on the island, and they will be questioned separately

183
00:11:07.220 --> 00:11:11.240
on September 18th. All nine answered no. Now, I want

184
00:11:11.259 --> 00:11:13.580
to connect this to something because it is the reason

185
00:11:13.600 --> 00:11:18.000
this segment is on the show. Three weeks ago in Plymouth, Massachusetts,

186
00:11:18.299 --> 00:11:20.779
Judge William Sullivan was handed a note from a jury

187
00:11:20.820 --> 00:11:24.639
foreperson saying one juror would not follow the law on

188
00:11:24.730 --> 00:11:28.970
reasonable doubt. A defense attorney demanded that juror be removed,

189
00:11:29.389 --> 00:11:32.169
accused him of lying under oath and asked the court

190
00:11:32.210 --> 00:11:36.929
to question him directly. Sullivan refused. He said the note

191
00:11:36.990 --> 00:11:39.769
did not show a juror refusing to follow the law.

192
00:11:40.259 --> 00:11:42.370
and that it was not proper for him to side

193
00:11:42.399 --> 00:11:46.169
with one side or the other in deliberations. Two judges,

194
00:11:46.669 --> 00:11:51.149
two states, two completely different cases, the same month. And

195
00:11:51.250 --> 00:11:56.049
both of them drew the identical line. Outside contact is investigable.

196
00:11:56.549 --> 00:11:59.250
If someone reached into that room, a court can and

197
00:11:59.309 --> 00:12:02.990
must find out. That is the recognized exception, and it

198
00:12:03.070 --> 00:12:06.549
exists in some form in every jurisdiction in this country.

199
00:12:07.389 --> 00:12:12.080
What happened inside the room is not. The reasoning, the arguments,

200
00:12:12.440 --> 00:12:16.840
the votes, whether anybody misunderstood an instruction, who convinced whom,

201
00:12:17.340 --> 00:12:19.720
what the foreperson thinks now that she has had four

202
00:12:19.759 --> 00:12:23.139
months to reconsider. All of that is off limits. That

203
00:12:23.259 --> 00:12:26.519
is called the no impeachment rule. And it is one

204
00:12:26.559 --> 00:12:30.179
of the least understood and most important things in American law.

205
00:12:30.830 --> 00:12:34.269
Here is why it exists. Without it, every losing party

206
00:12:34.309 --> 00:12:36.950
in every case would go find one juror willing to say,

207
00:12:37.190 --> 00:12:41.529
in hindsight, that they were confused. Verdicts would never be final.

208
00:12:41.929 --> 00:12:45.850
Jurors would be hounded by investigators for years afterward. And

209
00:12:46.049 --> 00:12:48.889
people would stop being candid in that room because everything

210
00:12:48.929 --> 00:12:51.860
they said could end up in an affidavit. So the

211
00:12:51.899 --> 00:12:55.960
rule says, we take the verdict, not the reasoning behind it.

212
00:12:56.399 --> 00:13:00.080
The verdict. It is a genuinely hard rule to love

213
00:13:00.139 --> 00:13:02.610
in a case like this one, where the foreperson has

214
00:13:02.649 --> 00:13:05.590
signed a sworn statement saying the panel never found what

215
00:13:05.629 --> 00:13:09.009
the verdict required. If she is right, then a man

216
00:13:09.049 --> 00:13:12.289
may be convicted of an offense whose elements were never established.

217
00:13:12.570 --> 00:13:14.850
And the law's answer is that the courts are not

218
00:13:14.889 --> 00:13:18.950
allowed to look. That is uncomfortable. I am not going

219
00:13:18.990 --> 00:13:22.850
to pretend otherwise. But watch what happened this month. Two

220
00:13:22.929 --> 00:13:27.139
judges in two states under enormous public pressure in cases

221
00:13:27.179 --> 00:13:30.799
with cameras in the courtroom and national audiences both had

222
00:13:30.860 --> 00:13:34.379
every incentive to open that door. Sullivan had a defense

223
00:13:34.419 --> 00:13:37.039
attorney shouting at him to do it. Wong had a

224
00:13:37.159 --> 00:13:41.200
sworn affidavit from a foreperson in his hand. Neither one

225
00:13:41.379 --> 00:13:45.039
opened it. That is the rule holding. And a rule

226
00:13:45.080 --> 00:13:48.340
that holds when it is inconvenient is the only kind

227
00:13:48.379 --> 00:13:52.399
worth having. Now back to that live stream comment. The

228
00:13:52.539 --> 00:13:56.250
allegation that sent 12 jurors back into a courtroom in September,

229
00:13:56.629 --> 00:13:59.529
four months after they went home, came from an anonymous

230
00:13:59.590 --> 00:14:03.149
person typing into the comment section of a live trial broadcast.

231
00:14:03.690 --> 00:14:06.450
Run by Law & Crime, which is the company that

232
00:14:06.590 --> 00:14:10.649
owns Court TV. So the network broadcasting the trial hosted

233
00:14:10.690 --> 00:14:13.820
the comment that produced the misconduct claim that may or

234
00:14:13.879 --> 00:14:17.340
may not unravel the verdict from that trial. I am

235
00:14:17.399 --> 00:14:20.879
not being snide about that. Law & Crime did not

236
00:14:20.940 --> 00:14:23.840
do anything wrong, and public access to courtrooms is a

237
00:14:23.960 --> 00:14:27.269
good thing that this show depends on entirely. But it

238
00:14:27.350 --> 00:14:30.539
is worth sitting with. We have built an apparatus where

239
00:14:30.659 --> 00:14:33.500
hundreds of thousands of strangers watch a trial in real

240
00:14:33.559 --> 00:14:37.129
time and talk to each other underneath it. And somewhere

241
00:14:37.230 --> 00:14:40.250
in that stream, one anonymous person made a claim that

242
00:14:40.269 --> 00:14:43.649
a court could not ignore. Nine jurors have now said

243
00:14:43.870 --> 00:14:47.879
it did not happen. Three more answer on Friday. And

244
00:14:47.909 --> 00:14:49.879
I want to end this segment on the person who

245
00:14:49.960 --> 00:14:54.460
is least mentioned in any of the coverage. Arielle Koenig survived.

246
00:14:54.879 --> 00:14:57.759
She got off that trail. She testified at a three-week

247
00:14:57.799 --> 00:15:00.559
trial and described the worst afternoon of her life to

248
00:15:00.620 --> 00:15:03.559
a room full of strangers, and then sat there while

249
00:15:03.620 --> 00:15:07.639
a defense attorney called her deceptive. She and Gerhard Koenig

250
00:15:07.659 --> 00:15:10.139
have two young children. She is the reason any of

251
00:15:10.179 --> 00:15:12.710
this is in a courtroom at all. Someone has to

252
00:15:12.759 --> 00:15:16.070
say that she is still here. When we come back,

253
00:15:16.389 --> 00:15:31.690
two defendants trying to fire their judges. Ethan Chapin was 20.

254
00:15:31.690 --> 00:15:36.669
Madison Mogan was 21. Zana Kernodle was 20. Kaylee Goncalves

255
00:15:36.700 --> 00:15:39.419
was 21. They were stabbed to death in a rented

256
00:15:39.460 --> 00:15:43.940
house in Moscow, Idaho in November of 2022. In July

257
00:15:44.080 --> 00:15:47.970
of 2025, Brian Koberger stood in a courtroom and pleaded

258
00:15:48.000 --> 00:15:50.990
guilty to killing all four of them in exchange for

259
00:15:51.029 --> 00:15:55.220
the state dropping the death penalty. Judge Stephen Hippler sentenced

260
00:15:55.259 --> 00:15:58.379
him to four consecutive life terms. A year later, he

261
00:15:58.419 --> 00:16:01.559
filed a handwritten petition to withdraw that plea, claiming he

262
00:16:01.639 --> 00:16:05.559
is innocent and that his own attorneys misled him. And

263
00:16:05.600 --> 00:16:08.539
last month, his new lawyer moved to disqualify Judge Hippler

264
00:16:08.559 --> 00:16:10.759
from hearing it and to move the proceedings back to

265
00:16:10.799 --> 00:16:14.220
Lata County, which is the county Koberger's original defense team,

266
00:16:14.620 --> 00:16:18.820
fought to escape. The argument about Hippler is not frivolous,

267
00:16:19.200 --> 00:16:22.149
and I said so when we covered it. At sentencing,

268
00:16:22.309 --> 00:16:25.320
the judge called Koberger a faceless coward and the worst

269
00:16:25.360 --> 00:16:28.019
of the worst, and questioned whether he was capable of

270
00:16:28.080 --> 00:16:31.120
telling the truth. All of that was within his rights.

271
00:16:31.840 --> 00:16:34.080
But the question now in front of that same judge

272
00:16:34.200 --> 00:16:37.960
is entirely about Koberger's credibility, and he has already said

273
00:16:38.000 --> 00:16:40.870
on the record what he thinks of it. Prosecutors say

274
00:16:40.929 --> 00:16:43.309
he has not made the showing the law requires and

275
00:16:43.389 --> 00:16:46.909
does not deserve a hearing at all. As things stand,

276
00:16:47.029 --> 00:16:50.980
an evidentiary hearing is on the calendar for June of 2027.

277
00:16:50.980 --> 00:16:53.980
Now take that to Florida. Rashawn Jones is accused of

278
00:16:54.039 --> 00:16:57.919
killing a University of Miami football teammate. This week, he

279
00:16:57.980 --> 00:17:00.600
made his fourth attempt to remove the judge in his case,

280
00:17:00.960 --> 00:17:04.160
saying he has a well-founded, firmly rooted fear that he

281
00:17:04.200 --> 00:17:07.220
cannot get a fair trial in front of her. She,

282
00:17:07.380 --> 00:17:10.740
at one point, described his proceedings as a circus. The

283
00:17:10.859 --> 00:17:15.470
fourth attempt. So what does the law actually require? Almost

284
00:17:15.730 --> 00:17:18.750
everywhere in this country, the standard is not whether a

285
00:17:18.869 --> 00:17:21.970
judge dislikes you, and it is not whether the judge

286
00:17:22.009 --> 00:17:24.890
has ruled against you, and it is not whether the

287
00:17:24.970 --> 00:17:28.059
judge has said something harsh from the bench at sentencing.

288
00:17:28.930 --> 00:17:31.740
Adverse rulings are not evidence of bias. If they were,

289
00:17:32.259 --> 00:17:35.059
every defendant who lost a motion would get a new judge.

290
00:17:35.779 --> 00:17:38.119
What you generally have to show is either an actual

291
00:17:38.180 --> 00:17:42.369
conflict like a financial interest or a family relationship. or

292
00:17:42.450 --> 00:17:46.170
facts that would make a reasonable person question the judge's impartiality.

293
00:17:47.009 --> 00:17:51.150
And the filings have to allege specific facts, not conclusions.

294
00:17:51.789 --> 00:17:54.880
Saying you fear a judge is not enough. Saying why,

295
00:17:55.019 --> 00:17:59.819
with particulars, sometimes is. Koberger's motion is the stronger of

296
00:17:59.859 --> 00:18:02.759
the two, and it is still an uphill climb. And

297
00:18:02.799 --> 00:18:05.220
then there is the thing nobody says out loud about

298
00:18:05.299 --> 00:18:09.319
motions like these. A defendant who repeatedly moves to disqualify

299
00:18:09.359 --> 00:18:12.059
his judge is often not trying to win the motion.

300
00:18:12.640 --> 00:18:15.940
He is building a record. Every denial is a potential

301
00:18:15.980 --> 00:18:19.000
appellate issue and a defendant with nothing left to lose

302
00:18:19.180 --> 00:18:22.559
and years of custody ahead has every reason to generate

303
00:18:22.680 --> 00:18:26.140
as many of those as possible. That is not cynicism.

304
00:18:26.329 --> 00:18:29.190
It is how the system is designed to work. The

305
00:18:29.230 --> 00:18:32.029
problem is that it costs something. Every one of those

306
00:18:32.089 --> 00:18:34.930
filings is a hearing and a response and a delay.

307
00:18:35.430 --> 00:18:37.269
And on the other side of every delay is a

308
00:18:37.309 --> 00:18:39.970
family sitting in a courtroom waiting for something to be over.

309
00:18:40.529 --> 00:18:43.059
There is a reason the standard is high, and it

310
00:18:43.150 --> 00:18:46.500
is not to protect judges. It is because the alternative,

311
00:18:46.660 --> 00:18:48.920
where a defendant can keep filing until he gets a

312
00:18:48.960 --> 00:18:52.160
judge he likes, would mean nobody ever gets tried at all.

313
00:18:52.839 --> 00:18:55.750
And notice what today's three stories have in common, because

314
00:18:55.930 --> 00:18:57.829
I did not plan it this way and then it

315
00:18:57.869 --> 00:19:01.690
was sitting right there. A defendant in Florida decided he

316
00:19:01.730 --> 00:19:04.759
would rather no jury and no lawyer decide his fate,

317
00:19:05.190 --> 00:19:09.049
only a judge. A judge in Hawaii decided there was

318
00:19:09.130 --> 00:19:12.190
exactly one question he was permitted to ask a jury,

319
00:19:12.690 --> 00:19:15.589
and one he was not, and held that line with

320
00:19:15.670 --> 00:19:19.250
a sworn affidavit sitting in front of him. And two

321
00:19:19.269 --> 00:19:21.990
defendants are arguing that the judges they have are the

322
00:19:22.089 --> 00:19:25.670
wrong ones. All three are the same fight. Who gets

323
00:19:25.690 --> 00:19:28.420
to decide and on what authority and what happens when

324
00:19:28.460 --> 00:19:30.920
the people we hand that authority to are only people?

325
00:19:31.759 --> 00:19:34.000
Our whole system rests on the idea that we can

326
00:19:34.039 --> 00:19:38.480
put that power somewhere and then trust the answer. This week,

327
00:19:38.599 --> 00:19:42.049
in three different courtrooms, it mostly held. That is not

328
00:19:42.089 --> 00:19:45.970
a dramatic ending. It is a good one. Ethan Chapin

329
00:19:46.009 --> 00:19:49.849
was 20. Madison Mogan was 21. Zana Kernodle was 20.

330
00:19:50.640 --> 00:19:54.500
Kaylee Goncalves was 21. Four years on, their families are

331
00:19:54.539 --> 00:19:57.640
reading motions about venue. Someone has to say their names.

332
00:20:01.049 --> 00:20:04.710
That's the show for Wednesday, September 16th. If you listen

333
00:20:04.769 --> 00:20:06.750
on Apple, there is a button at the top that

334
00:20:06.809 --> 00:20:12.220
says listen uninterrupted. $ 5 a month, no ads, and it

335
00:20:12.299 --> 00:20:15.180
is not just this show. It is thousands of them

336
00:20:15.240 --> 00:20:18.420
across Calaroga Media. 30 days free if you want to

337
00:20:18.480 --> 00:20:22.990
test it. To everybody who already subscribes, thank you sincerely.

338
00:20:23.750 --> 00:20:26.869
On Spotify, drop a comment on the Hawaii case because

339
00:20:26.970 --> 00:20:30.210
I keep flipping on it. A foreperson has sworn under

340
00:20:30.369 --> 00:20:33.190
oath that her jury never found what the verdict required,

341
00:20:33.630 --> 00:20:36.119
and the law says no court is allowed to ask

342
00:20:36.160 --> 00:20:39.690
about it. Is that rule protecting the system or protecting

343
00:20:39.730 --> 00:20:42.650
a mistake? We are in Largo every day this week.

344
00:20:42.910 --> 00:20:46.150
On Friday, the last three Koenig jurors get questioned in Honolulu.

345
00:20:46.710 --> 00:20:50.470
Matthew Exton is sentenced Monday and faces up to 25 years.

346
00:20:51.049 --> 00:20:53.529
And a week from today, Lindsay Clancy is back in

347
00:20:53.569 --> 00:20:56.569
front of Judge Sullivan when Plymouth County should finally say

348
00:20:56.750 --> 00:21:00.950
whether it is retrying that case. I'm Garrett Fisher. Do better.

349
00:21:03.210 --> 00:21:06.950
A few notes on sourcing. On the Florida trial. Tomasz

350
00:21:06.990 --> 00:21:11.029
Kosowski has pleaded not guilty and is presumed innocent. Everything

351
00:21:11.089 --> 00:21:14.450
described from the state's opening statement and from investigative reports

352
00:21:14.569 --> 00:21:17.890
is an allegation and has not been proven. Accounts have

353
00:21:17.930 --> 00:21:20.410
differed on the exact amount of cash recovered and on

354
00:21:20.430 --> 00:21:23.660
the defendant's age. A defendant has no obligation to make

355
00:21:23.680 --> 00:21:27.480
an opening statement or to cross-examine any witness, and declining

356
00:21:27.500 --> 00:21:30.740
to do so is not evidence of anything. A judge

357
00:21:30.759 --> 00:21:33.079
who has presided over this case for three years has

358
00:21:33.140 --> 00:21:36.190
found him competent to waive counsel and a jury. and

359
00:21:36.309 --> 00:21:40.069
nothing here is a suggestion otherwise or a diagnosis of anyone.

360
00:21:40.809 --> 00:21:44.119
On the Hawaii case, Gerhard Koenig was acquitted of attempted

361
00:21:44.150 --> 00:21:48.259
second-degree murder and convicted of attempted manslaughter. His motion for

362
00:21:48.299 --> 00:21:51.480
a new trial is pending and unresolved, and Judge Wong

363
00:21:51.500 --> 00:21:55.180
has not ruled. The statements attributed to jurors come from

364
00:21:55.200 --> 00:21:58.619
their own media interviews and from a sworn affidavit provided

365
00:21:58.660 --> 00:22:02.349
to the defense. The allegation that a juror communicated with

366
00:22:02.390 --> 00:22:06.920
an outside party during deliberations originated in an anonymous comment

367
00:22:07.039 --> 00:22:10.359
on a trial livestream. It is unproven, and no juror

368
00:22:10.400 --> 00:22:14.019
has been found to have committed any misconduct. Nine jurors

369
00:22:14.099 --> 00:22:17.380
answered questions on September 11th, and three more are scheduled

370
00:22:17.420 --> 00:22:21.650
for September 18th. On the Idaho and Florida disqualification motions,

371
00:22:22.089 --> 00:22:26.009
Brian Koberger pleaded guilty and was sentenced, and his petition

372
00:22:26.029 --> 00:22:29.349
to withdraw that plea has not been granted. His claim

373
00:22:29.390 --> 00:22:32.450
that his prior attorneys misled him is an allegation in

374
00:22:32.490 --> 00:22:35.549
a filing. And those attorneys have not been found to

375
00:22:35.569 --> 00:22:40.240
have done anything improper. Rashawn Jones has pleaded not guilty

376
00:22:40.339 --> 00:22:44.619
and is presumed innocent. This episode discusses domestic violence and

377
00:22:44.660 --> 00:22:47.220
the killing of young people. If you or someone you

378
00:22:47.259 --> 00:22:51.369
know is experiencing domestic violence, the National Domestic Violence Hotline

379
00:22:51.450 --> 00:22:53.119
is available around the clock at 1-800-799-7233.