April 29, 2026

BILLIONAIRE BLOOD FEUD: MUSK TAKES THE STAND IN $150 BILLION OPENAI TRIAL

BILLIONAIRE BLOOD FEUD: MUSK TAKES THE STAND IN $150 BILLION OPENAI TRIAL

Two of the richest men on Earth, one charity, and a federal jury that has to figure out who’s lying. Garret Fisher delivers a special full-episode breakdown of the most consequential courtroom showdown in tech history. Elon Musk is suing OpenAI for...

Two of the richest men on Earth, one charity, and a federal jury that has to figure out who’s lying.

Garret Fisher delivers a special full-episode breakdown of the most consequential courtroom showdown in tech history. Elon Musk is suing OpenAI for one hundred and fifty billion dollars, accusing Sam Altman of stealing the charity Musk helped found in 2015. OpenAI says it’s sour grapes from a billionaire who quit, lost, and started a competitor. Day One brought opening statements, a near-gag-order, and Musk on the witness stand declaring that the entire foundation of charitable giving in America is at stake. We trace the origin, break down yesterday’s testimony, and revisit the 2023 boardroom coup that almost ended Sam Altman.

Join our new FB groups page here. Take the poll!

Join the Daily Crime & Justice community on social media! We're building a passionate group of true crime enthusiasts who love diving deep into the most shocking cases in America.
Follow us on Facebook and Instagram by searching "Daily Crime & Justice" on either platform.


You'll get exclusive behind-the-scenes content, breaking news updates on cases we're covering, and early alerts when new episodes drop. Our social media is where Garret Fisher's hottest takes live, including reactions that don't make it into the show.

But more importantly, it's where YOU come in. Share your theories, debate the verdicts, and connect with fellow listeners who are just as obsessed with justice as you are. Did the jury get it right? What questions do you still have? Your comments and insights often shape future episodes.


We cover the trials that matter, but our community makes the conversation unforgettable. Come for Garret's signature cynical commentary, stay for the incredible discussions with thousands of true crime fans who get it.
WEBVTT

1
00:00:03.200 --> 00:00:11.279
Callarogus Shark Media. Good morning, I'm Garrett Fisher.

2
00:00:11.519 --> 00:00:14.839
This is Daily Crime and Justice for Wednesday, April twenty ninth,

3
00:00:14.960 --> 00:00:18.199
twenty twenty six. The crew is here, the coffee is hot,

4
00:00:18.199 --> 00:00:21.399
and we're doing something a little different today. One story,

5
00:00:21.719 --> 00:00:25.239
one trial, one hundred and fifty billion dollars on the line.

6
00:00:25.640 --> 00:00:30.600
Let's get into it. There's a federal courthouse in Oakland, California,

7
00:00:30.760 --> 00:00:33.679
and yesterday morning it became the most expensive piece of

8
00:00:33.719 --> 00:00:38.159
real estate in American jurisprudence because what is happening inside

9
00:00:38.159 --> 00:00:41.240
that building is the richest man in the world suing

10
00:00:41.320 --> 00:00:45.679
the most influential artificial intelligence company in the world over

11
00:00:45.759 --> 00:00:48.640
the future of Depending on who you ask, the human

12
00:00:48.719 --> 00:00:53.320
race itself, or one billionaire's bruised ego. Elon Musk is

13
00:00:53.359 --> 00:00:57.039
suing open Ai, the company that makes chat GPT, the

14
00:00:57.119 --> 00:01:00.520
company he helped found in twenty fifteen as a non profit,

15
00:01:00.960 --> 00:01:04.799
walked away from in twenty eighteen after losing a power struggle,

16
00:01:05.159 --> 00:01:07.519
and has now spent the better part of two years

17
00:01:07.680 --> 00:01:11.040
dragging into court. He is asking for one hundred and

18
00:01:11.079 --> 00:01:14.920
fifty billion dollars in damages from open Ai and Microsoft.

19
00:01:15.519 --> 00:01:17.920
He wants Sam Altman removed from the board of the

20
00:01:17.959 --> 00:01:22.159
company Sam Altman runs. He wants the entire restructuring of

21
00:01:22.200 --> 00:01:27.359
open ai from nonprofit charity to for profit corporation, unwound, reversed,

22
00:01:27.879 --> 00:01:29.599
rolled back to the way it used to be when

23
00:01:29.640 --> 00:01:35.560
Elon was in charge. His argument open Ai was a charity.

24
00:01:36.560 --> 00:01:41.480
Sam Altman stole the charity. Quote scam Altman and Greg

25
00:01:41.519 --> 00:01:45.760
Stockman stole a charity. That is what Musk has been

26
00:01:45.799 --> 00:01:48.319
posting to his two hundred and forty million followers on

27
00:01:48.760 --> 00:01:52.120
x for months. That is what his lawyer told the

28
00:01:52.200 --> 00:01:56.719
jury yesterday in his opening statement. And the consequences, according

29
00:01:56.719 --> 00:02:00.200
to Musk himself, are not just about him, not just

30
00:02:00.200 --> 00:02:03.519
about Altman, not just about a Silicon Valley feud.

31
00:02:04.200 --> 00:02:04.599
Quote.

32
00:02:05.200 --> 00:02:09.759
The entire foundation of charitable giving in America will be destroyed.

33
00:02:10.199 --> 00:02:14.759
Open AI's response sour grapes. We are here, open AI's

34
00:02:14.800 --> 00:02:17.800
lawyer told the jury because mister Musk did not get

35
00:02:17.840 --> 00:02:18.759
his way at open Ai.

36
00:02:19.199 --> 00:02:19.680
He quit.

37
00:02:20.000 --> 00:02:23.520
He said we would fail. We did not fail. He

38
00:02:23.639 --> 00:02:26.199
started a competitor. He is mad about it.

39
00:02:26.360 --> 00:02:27.319
That is what this is.

40
00:02:27.840 --> 00:02:30.120
Look, I'm going to be honest with you. There is

41
00:02:30.280 --> 00:02:32.800
no good guy in this story. There is a man

42
00:02:32.840 --> 00:02:36.479
whose private foundation fails to meet the legal minimum required

43
00:02:36.520 --> 00:02:39.879
to keep its tax exempt status, lecturing a federal jury

44
00:02:39.919 --> 00:02:43.439
about the sanctity of American charity. And there is a

45
00:02:43.520 --> 00:02:45.840
man whose own board fired him in twenty twenty three

46
00:02:45.960 --> 00:02:49.159
for and I'm reading this from the official release not

47
00:02:49.439 --> 00:02:53.439
being consistently candid in his communications, which is a beautifully

48
00:02:53.520 --> 00:02:56.479
lawyered way of saying they thought he was lying to them.

49
00:02:56.840 --> 00:03:02.319
This is Daily Crime and Justice Today. One story, three segments,

50
00:03:02.599 --> 00:03:07.159
the origin how a research nonprofit became a seven hundred

51
00:03:07.199 --> 00:03:11.759
and thirty billion dollar corporation, The trial, what happened on

52
00:03:11.879 --> 00:03:15.319
day one, what Musk set on the stand, and what

53
00:03:15.400 --> 00:03:16.800
open AI's lawyer.

54
00:03:16.599 --> 00:03:17.919
Hit him with on the way in.

55
00:03:18.840 --> 00:03:22.280
And the bigger picture, the twenty twenty three boardroom coup

56
00:03:22.360 --> 00:03:26.240
that almost took Sam Altman down, the witnesses still to come,

57
00:03:26.520 --> 00:03:28.719
and what a verdict either way could do to an

58
00:03:28.759 --> 00:03:31.439
industry that already feels like it is running ten steps

59
00:03:31.479 --> 00:03:34.759
ahead of anyone trying to regulate it. I'm Garrett Fisher,

60
00:03:34.960 --> 00:03:42.879
Let's get into it. December twenty fifteen, a small group

61
00:03:42.919 --> 00:03:46.479
of artificial intelligence researchers and tech executives gather around a

62
00:03:46.560 --> 00:03:51.240
vision build an AI lab, open source nonprofit mission statement,

63
00:03:51.479 --> 00:03:55.759
develop artificial intelligence for the benefit of humanity, not for shareholders,

64
00:03:56.000 --> 00:04:01.000
not for billionaires, for everybody. The founders include ud Elon Musk.

65
00:04:01.199 --> 00:04:04.159
They include Sam Altman, who at the time is running

66
00:04:04.360 --> 00:04:09.120
y Combinator, the famous Silicon Valley startup accelerator. They include

67
00:04:09.120 --> 00:04:13.240
a researcher named Greg Brockman, who would become open AI's president,

68
00:04:13.680 --> 00:04:17.600
and Ilia Suitskeever, a brilliant computer scientist who would become

69
00:04:17.720 --> 00:04:22.399
its chief scientist. There are others. The whole thing gets

70
00:04:22.439 --> 00:04:27.199
seed money about a billion dollars in pledge funding from Musk,

71
00:04:27.439 --> 00:04:30.800
from Reid Hoffman, from Peter Thiel, from a few others.

72
00:04:31.720 --> 00:04:36.199
The headquarters is at first Greg Brockman's apartment. The pitch

73
00:04:36.279 --> 00:04:40.480
is altruistic. It is also if you understand the moment strategic.

74
00:04:41.240 --> 00:04:44.879
Google had just acquired DeepMind, the most advanced AI lab

75
00:04:44.920 --> 00:04:48.720
on the planet, in twenty fourteen. The fear in Silicon

76
00:04:48.800 --> 00:04:51.639
Valley among people who actually thought about this stuff was

77
00:04:51.639 --> 00:04:55.279
that one company, Google was going to control the most

78
00:04:55.319 --> 00:04:59.720
powerful technology in human history. The open ai founders, including

79
00:04:59.759 --> 00:05:04.199
mu Dusk, said no, we need a counterweight, a charity,

80
00:05:04.839 --> 00:05:08.079
something that will release its research openly, will not be

81
00:05:08.160 --> 00:05:11.199
locked behind a corporate paywall, will not be optimized for

82
00:05:11.240 --> 00:05:16.000
shareholder value. AI for everyone, and they meant it for

83
00:05:16.079 --> 00:05:19.040
a while. Musk would later tell anyone who would listen

84
00:05:19.079 --> 00:05:21.879
that he donated about forty four million dollars to Open

85
00:05:21.920 --> 00:05:25.759
AI in those first few years, maybe more. The number

86
00:05:25.839 --> 00:05:28.920
Musks team gave the court yesterday was thirty eight million

87
00:05:28.959 --> 00:05:32.319
in seed money. Either way, tens of millions of dollars

88
00:05:32.319 --> 00:05:35.600
from one man into a charity. That part is documented.

89
00:05:35.879 --> 00:05:39.000
That part is not in dispute. What is in dispute

90
00:05:39.079 --> 00:05:43.519
is what happened next. By twenty seventeen, Open AI is

91
00:05:43.600 --> 00:05:47.160
burning through cash. Training advanced AI models is one of

92
00:05:47.199 --> 00:05:49.480
the most expensive things you can do with a computer.

93
00:05:50.079 --> 00:05:52.800
We are talking hundreds of millions of dollars in compute

94
00:05:52.839 --> 00:05:56.720
costs to train a single model. Nonprofits do not have

95
00:05:56.759 --> 00:05:59.839
that kind of money, and the existing donors, including Musk,

96
00:06:00.240 --> 00:06:03.360
are starting to wonder if maybe a different structure is needed.

97
00:06:04.079 --> 00:06:07.879
In the summer of twenty seventeen, two of Musk's closest associates,

98
00:06:08.279 --> 00:06:11.439
Shiven Zillis and Sam Teller, who served as dual chiefs

99
00:06:11.439 --> 00:06:14.399
of staff for Musk at the time were emailing each

100
00:06:14.399 --> 00:06:18.759
other about restructuring open Ai, about either turning the original

101
00:06:18.800 --> 00:06:22.800
nonprofit into a traditional company or attaching the charity to

102
00:06:22.879 --> 00:06:27.199
a for profit operation. About giving Elon Musk fifty five

103
00:06:27.240 --> 00:06:30.600
percent of the equity. Sam Altman would get seven and

104
00:06:30.639 --> 00:06:33.839
a half percent. The math there should tell you everything

105
00:06:33.879 --> 00:06:35.680
you need to know about who was supposed to be

106
00:06:35.680 --> 00:06:39.319
in charge. And here is where the two stories diverge.

107
00:06:39.800 --> 00:06:43.959
Musk's version, as his lawyer, Stephen Molo told the jury yesterday, Yes,

108
00:06:44.120 --> 00:06:47.319
Elon was open to a for profit structure, but the

109
00:06:47.399 --> 00:06:51.480
concept was that he Elon would have control and the

110
00:06:51.519 --> 00:06:55.079
importance of the for profit subsidiary would diminish over time.

111
00:06:55.560 --> 00:06:59.040
The nonprofit would always run things, the mission would always

112
00:06:59.040 --> 00:07:02.079
come first. It was a vehicle to raise money in

113
00:07:02.160 --> 00:07:06.120
the short term, nothing more. Open AI's version, as their

114
00:07:06.199 --> 00:07:10.319
lawyer William Savatt told a jury, Musk wanted control, he

115
00:07:10.439 --> 00:07:13.560
did not get it, so he left, and once he

116
00:07:13.680 --> 00:07:16.920
was gone, Open Ai did exactly what Musk himself had

117
00:07:16.959 --> 00:07:19.879
been pushing for. It created a for profit arm to

118
00:07:19.959 --> 00:07:23.160
raise the money the company needed. The only difference was

119
00:07:23.480 --> 00:07:27.160
Musk was not running it. In twenty eighteen, Musk leaves

120
00:07:27.199 --> 00:07:30.199
the open Ai board. The relationship between him and Sam

121
00:07:30.240 --> 00:07:34.480
Altman is, to put it gently broken. Around that time,

122
00:07:34.600 --> 00:07:37.600
Musk wrote an email submitted his evidence in this trial

123
00:07:37.759 --> 00:07:40.680
that says, in part, open Ai is on a path

124
00:07:40.720 --> 00:07:44.920
of certain failure relative to Google and Tesla. Quote is

125
00:07:44.959 --> 00:07:47.000
the only path that could even hope to hold a

126
00:07:47.040 --> 00:07:51.240
candle to Google. Read that again, the only path that

127
00:07:51.279 --> 00:07:55.120
could hope to hold a candle. Tesla, not open Ai,

128
00:07:55.600 --> 00:08:00.240
not the charity, Tesla, the for profit electric car company

129
00:08:00.279 --> 00:08:03.000
that Elon Musk owned. That email, by the way, was

130
00:08:03.040 --> 00:08:06.959
sent before chat gpt existed, before open Ai was a

131
00:08:07.079 --> 00:08:12.560
household name, before Musk founded xai. So when open AI's

132
00:08:12.600 --> 00:08:15.600
lawyer told the jury yesterday that Musk did not suddenly

133
00:08:15.639 --> 00:08:18.680
care about the charity until the company started making money,

134
00:08:19.160 --> 00:08:22.800
that is the email he was talking about. In twenty nineteen,

135
00:08:23.040 --> 00:08:26.199
open Ai creates a for profit subsidiary. It signs a

136
00:08:26.279 --> 00:08:30.680
one billion dollar partnership with Microsoft. Musk does not sue,

137
00:08:31.120 --> 00:08:35.720
He does not object publicly. He continues to make occasional donations.

138
00:08:36.240 --> 00:08:39.919
In November of twenty twenty two, open Ai releases chat gpt.

139
00:08:40.639 --> 00:08:42.120
The world changes overnight.

140
00:08:42.600 --> 00:08:45.919
Within two months, chat gpt has one hundred million users

141
00:08:46.440 --> 00:08:49.200
within a year. The AI race is the only race

142
00:08:49.240 --> 00:08:52.519
in tech. In March of twenty twenty three, Elon Musk

143
00:08:52.519 --> 00:08:54.440
founds his own for profit AI company.

144
00:08:54.679 --> 00:08:56.240
He calls it XAI.

145
00:08:57.360 --> 00:09:00.919
In February of twenty twenty four, Elon Musk's Who's open AI?

146
00:09:01.720 --> 00:09:04.799
The timeline tells you something. What it tells you depends

147
00:09:04.879 --> 00:09:07.159
on which side of the courtroom you are sitting on.

148
00:09:08.759 --> 00:09:11.639
Coming up day one in court, Musk on the stand,

149
00:09:11.840 --> 00:09:14.879
the opening statements, and the lawyer Sam Altman's team brought

150
00:09:14.879 --> 00:09:17.799
in to handle Elon Musk has done this exact dance

151
00:09:17.840 --> 00:09:18.480
with him before.

152
00:09:18.720 --> 00:09:30.000
We'll be right back. The Ronald V.

153
00:09:30.120 --> 00:09:34.679
Delhams Federal Courthouse is in downtown Oakland, California, twelve miles

154
00:09:34.720 --> 00:09:37.919
from Open AI's headquarters in San Francisco, but a.

155
00:09:37.840 --> 00:09:39.200
World away culturally.

156
00:09:39.960 --> 00:09:44.279
Ronald Delhams was a Democratic socialist, a longtime congressman, a

157
00:09:44.399 --> 00:09:47.279
Vietnam era anti war activist who ended up on Richard

158
00:09:47.399 --> 00:09:51.080
Nixon's enemies list. The courthouse is name for him. He

159
00:09:51.200 --> 00:09:54.639
died in twenty eighteen. He would have hated this trial.

160
00:09:55.639 --> 00:09:58.440
Yesterday morning, Sam Altman walked into the building through the

161
00:09:58.480 --> 00:10:02.559
basement for security. Re so did Elon Musk. The front

162
00:10:02.600 --> 00:10:06.679
doors were thick with photographers, lawyers, jurors, and reporters. Inside

163
00:10:06.720 --> 00:10:10.159
the courtroom is small. Six benches on the left, three

164
00:10:10.200 --> 00:10:14.360
on the right. Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, the same judge

165
00:10:14.399 --> 00:10:17.200
who handled the high profile lawsuit against Apple over the

166
00:10:17.200 --> 00:10:21.879
app store sits, elevated above everyone. Before the jury was

167
00:10:21.879 --> 00:10:25.559
even brought in. Judge Gonzales Rogers called Elon Musk to

168
00:10:25.600 --> 00:10:29.720
the bench. She had questions about his social media, specifically

169
00:10:29.759 --> 00:10:32.159
about the two dozen plus posts he made on Monday

170
00:10:32.159 --> 00:10:36.360
on x the platform he owns attacking open ai, attacking

171
00:10:36.399 --> 00:10:40.279
Sam Altman, calling him scam Altman and Greg Brockman, Greg

172
00:10:40.320 --> 00:10:45.320
Stockman accusing them of stealing a charity. Quote from the judge,

173
00:10:45.480 --> 00:10:47.919
how can we get things done without you making things.

174
00:10:47.639 --> 00:10:48.960
Worse outside the courtroom?

175
00:10:49.440 --> 00:10:53.600
That is a federal judge asking Elon Musk to please

176
00:10:53.960 --> 00:10:58.240
please stop making her trial harder. Musk said he was

177
00:10:58.360 --> 00:11:01.200
just responding to things open ai I had said online.

178
00:11:01.679 --> 00:11:05.279
The judge asked him and Sam Altman and Greg Brockman

179
00:11:05.679 --> 00:11:09.120
to start with a clean slate, keep things to a minimum.

180
00:11:09.320 --> 00:11:13.759
They all agreed, we will see how long that lasts.

181
00:11:14.279 --> 00:11:19.600
Then opening statements began. Musk's lead counsel, Stephen Molo, stood

182
00:11:19.639 --> 00:11:22.879
up and walked the jury through the moral framing. AI

183
00:11:23.039 --> 00:11:26.039
should be built for the benefit of humanity, not for

184
00:11:26.159 --> 00:11:30.080
the benefit of Sam Altman and Greg Brockman. He explained

185
00:11:30.120 --> 00:11:34.960
basic terminology, what artificial general intelligence is, what a charity

186
00:11:35.000 --> 00:11:37.600
is supposed to do. He told the jury that years

187
00:11:37.639 --> 00:11:40.879
ago Elon Musk had personally warned Barack Obama about the

188
00:11:40.960 --> 00:11:44.919
dangers of AI. The government failed to act, so Musk

189
00:11:45.039 --> 00:11:48.279
and others built open AI to do what the government

190
00:11:48.320 --> 00:11:51.399
would not and the line Molo wanted the jury to

191
00:11:51.480 --> 00:11:54.679
leave the courtroom carrying quote, no one should be allowed

192
00:11:54.679 --> 00:11:59.120
to steal a charity. To steal a charity is absolutely wrong.

193
00:12:00.080 --> 00:12:03.000
Three questions. He told the jury to keep three questions

194
00:12:03.000 --> 00:12:06.320
in mind throughout the entire trial. Number one, did open

195
00:12:06.360 --> 00:12:09.200
AI have a charitable mission to operate as a nonprofit

196
00:12:09.320 --> 00:12:12.799
to develop safe AI open source for the good of humanity?

197
00:12:13.440 --> 00:12:13.960
Number two?

198
00:12:14.440 --> 00:12:17.240
Did Altman and Brockman violate that mission through what they

199
00:12:17.240 --> 00:12:19.120
have done with the for profit business?

200
00:12:19.840 --> 00:12:20.480
Number three?

201
00:12:20.720 --> 00:12:24.559
Did Microsoft know about the charitable mission and substantially assist

202
00:12:24.600 --> 00:12:26.200
Altman and Brockman in breaching it?

203
00:12:26.639 --> 00:12:26.960
Three?

204
00:12:27.120 --> 00:12:32.559
Questions yes, yes, and yes, and Musk wins no on

205
00:12:32.679 --> 00:12:36.000
any one of them, and the case falls apart. Then

206
00:12:36.039 --> 00:12:39.559
open AI's lawyer stood up. William savat is a partner

207
00:12:39.600 --> 00:12:43.200
at the law firm Walktel, Lipton, Rosen and Katz. He

208
00:12:43.240 --> 00:12:47.320
represented Twitter now X when Elon Musk tried to back

209
00:12:47.360 --> 00:12:50.679
out of buying it for forty four billion dollars. Yes,

210
00:12:50.799 --> 00:12:54.879
you heard that right. The lawyer defending open Ai yesterday

211
00:12:55.039 --> 00:12:57.600
is the same lawyer who beat Elon Musk in court

212
00:12:57.639 --> 00:13:01.120
three years ago. Whoever picks Savag for this case has

213
00:13:01.159 --> 00:13:04.600
a sense of humor, and Sabat knew his audience. He

214
00:13:04.679 --> 00:13:08.240
told the jury very directly that Musk did not understand

215
00:13:08.320 --> 00:13:12.120
artificial intelligence very well. In twenty seventeen and twenty eighteen,

216
00:13:12.840 --> 00:13:15.799
he showed them the emails between Musk's chiefs of staff

217
00:13:15.879 --> 00:13:18.919
about Musk getting fifty five percent of a for profit

218
00:13:19.039 --> 00:13:24.399
open Ai. He explained painstakingly how the open AI nonprofit

219
00:13:24.519 --> 00:13:28.480
still controls the for profit company. He told the jury

220
00:13:28.480 --> 00:13:32.960
about the work the nonprofit is doing, funding research, redistributing billions,

221
00:13:33.080 --> 00:13:37.360
working on disease cures and economic equity programs. Then he

222
00:13:37.440 --> 00:13:40.519
landed the punch quote, we are here because mister Musk

223
00:13:40.559 --> 00:13:42.159
did not get his way at Open Ai.

224
00:13:42.559 --> 00:13:43.559
That is what happened.

225
00:13:43.679 --> 00:13:46.519
He quit saying they would fail for sure, but my

226
00:13:46.639 --> 00:13:49.000
clients had the nerve to go on and succeed without him.

227
00:13:49.399 --> 00:13:52.919
Mister Musk did not like that. Sour grapes. That was

228
00:13:52.960 --> 00:13:54.360
the through line.

229
00:13:54.440 --> 00:13:56.639
Sour grapes from a man who started his own for

230
00:13:56.879 --> 00:13:59.639
profit AI company and is now suing the people who

231
00:13:59.679 --> 00:14:03.679
beat up to the finish line. Microsoft's lawyer Russell Cohen

232
00:14:03.960 --> 00:14:08.039
made the same case. Microsoft had no idea Sam Altman

233
00:14:08.200 --> 00:14:11.480
was being fired in November of twenty twenty three. They

234
00:14:11.519 --> 00:14:15.600
were blindsided, They were facing a crisis. They are not

235
00:14:15.799 --> 00:14:19.360
pulling strings, They are just a partner. And Musk never

236
00:14:19.440 --> 00:14:22.720
raised any of these objections about Microsoft's involvement until chat

237
00:14:22.759 --> 00:14:27.799
GPT made everyone rich. Then, after a twenty minute recess,

238
00:14:28.039 --> 00:14:31.039
Elon Musk took the stand. His own lawyer led the

239
00:14:31.039 --> 00:14:37.200
direct examination, walked him through his entire career PayPal, SpaceX, Tesla,

240
00:14:37.759 --> 00:14:40.559
the lumberjack work he did as a younger man, the

241
00:14:40.679 --> 00:14:44.480
interest in physics in programming. Musk played up the dreamer

242
00:14:44.519 --> 00:14:48.559
persona for the jury quote, life just cannot be about

243
00:14:48.559 --> 00:14:52.120
solving one miserable problem after another. There have to be

244
00:14:52.200 --> 00:14:55.960
reasons to be excited and inspired about the future. Then

245
00:14:56.039 --> 00:14:59.039
they got to open AI. Quote from Musk on the

246
00:14:59.039 --> 00:15:02.080
witness stand, it is not okay to steal a charity.

247
00:15:02.759 --> 00:15:05.559
He added that if Altman and open AI win, it

248
00:15:05.600 --> 00:15:09.279
would quote give license to looting every charity in America

249
00:15:09.840 --> 00:15:13.840
and quote the entire foundation of charitable giving in America

250
00:15:13.919 --> 00:15:14.919
will be destroyed.

251
00:15:15.600 --> 00:15:17.240
Look, I'm going to be honest with you.

252
00:15:17.559 --> 00:15:20.759
The entire foundation of charitable giving in America rests on

253
00:15:20.799 --> 00:15:23.600
a lot of things, and I am genuinely not sure

254
00:15:23.679 --> 00:15:25.840
one of them is whether or not Sam Altman is

255
00:15:25.879 --> 00:15:28.399
on the board of Open AI in twenty twenty six.

256
00:15:28.960 --> 00:15:31.679
But here is the part that, depending on your tolerance

257
00:15:31.720 --> 00:15:35.120
for irony, will either make you laugh or throw something

258
00:15:35.159 --> 00:15:39.600
at the wall. The Musk Foundation, Elon Musk's personal charity,

259
00:15:39.919 --> 00:15:42.600
had fourteen billion dollars in assets at the end of

260
00:15:42.639 --> 00:15:46.919
twenty twenty four. Federal law requires private foundations to give

261
00:15:46.960 --> 00:15:49.840
away at least five percent of their assets every year.

262
00:15:50.240 --> 00:15:53.360
It is the cost of keeping your tax exempt status.

263
00:15:53.639 --> 00:15:55.840
The Musk Foundation has failed to meet.

264
00:15:55.639 --> 00:15:57.519
That minimum four years in a row.

265
00:15:57.759 --> 00:15:59.879
That is the man on the stand yesterday telling of

266
00:15:59.879 --> 00:16:03.440
federal jury that the foundation of charitable giving in America

267
00:16:03.720 --> 00:16:04.320
is at stake.

268
00:16:04.879 --> 00:16:06.080
There is a playbook for this.

269
00:16:06.519 --> 00:16:09.519
The playbook is when you have nothing else, you wrap

270
00:16:09.559 --> 00:16:15.200
your argument in something everyone agrees is good children, veterans charity,

271
00:16:16.080 --> 00:16:18.120
and you hope the jury does not notice that you

272
00:16:18.240 --> 00:16:21.320
are personally the reason for half the things wrong with

273
00:16:21.399 --> 00:16:24.679
the thing you claim to defend. The court adjourned for

274
00:16:24.720 --> 00:16:27.399
the day, with Musk still on the stand. He is

275
00:16:27.480 --> 00:16:32.000
expected to return today. Direct examination will continue, and then

276
00:16:32.159 --> 00:16:35.480
Open Aiyes lawyers, including the man who beat Musk in

277
00:16:35.519 --> 00:16:39.279
the X case, get their turn at cross examination that

278
00:16:39.440 --> 00:16:45.279
should be entertaining commercial tease. The twenty twenty three boardroom

279
00:16:45.360 --> 00:16:48.720
coup that almost ended Sam Altman's career, the directors who

280
00:16:48.720 --> 00:16:51.759
said the CEO was psychologically abusive, and what is still

281
00:16:51.759 --> 00:16:52.720
to come in this trial.

282
00:16:53.080 --> 00:17:07.359
Stay with us.

283
00:17:04.720 --> 00:17:08.039
To understand why this trial matters. You have to understand

284
00:17:08.039 --> 00:17:11.480
what happened in November of twenty twenty three, because there

285
00:17:11.519 --> 00:17:13.640
is one part of Elon Musk's story that I have

286
00:17:13.720 --> 00:17:14.400
to give him.

287
00:17:14.680 --> 00:17:16.640
The Open AI board, the.

288
00:17:16.480 --> 00:17:20.079
One running the nonprofit that supposedly oversees the for profit,

289
00:17:20.680 --> 00:17:25.519
fired Sam Altman November seventeenth, twenty twenty three, the board

290
00:17:25.559 --> 00:17:30.200
issued a statement quote Altman was not consistently candid in

291
00:17:30.240 --> 00:17:33.960
his communications with the board, hindering its ability to exercise

292
00:17:34.039 --> 00:17:35.279
its responsibilities.

293
00:17:35.920 --> 00:17:38.200
Quote, the board no longer.

294
00:17:37.920 --> 00:17:41.079
Has confidence in his ability to continue leading open Ai.

295
00:17:41.759 --> 00:17:44.200
That is a corporate way of saying, we think he

296
00:17:44.359 --> 00:17:47.359
was lying to us. The board members who voted to

297
00:17:47.359 --> 00:17:51.359
fire Altman included Helen Toner, a researcher at Georgetown Center

298
00:17:51.359 --> 00:17:57.119
for Security and Emerging Technology, Tasha McCauley, an entrepreneur, Adam DiAngelo,

299
00:17:57.359 --> 00:18:02.160
the CEO of Cora, and this is the kicker. Eliaswutzskiver,

300
00:18:02.640 --> 00:18:06.039
the open Ai co founder, the chief scientist, the man who,

301
00:18:06.279 --> 00:18:09.440
more than anyone except possibly Altman, had built the company.

302
00:18:10.079 --> 00:18:13.640
Helen Toner gave an interview about it later on a podcast,

303
00:18:14.119 --> 00:18:17.240
months after she had been pushed out, and what she

304
00:18:17.400 --> 00:18:20.680
said is on the record now. Toner said the board

305
00:18:20.720 --> 00:18:23.839
found out about the public release of chat GPT, the

306
00:18:23.920 --> 00:18:28.400
most consequential product launch in modern technology, on Twitter, like

307
00:18:28.440 --> 00:18:32.359
everyone else. Altman did not tell them. Toner said Altman

308
00:18:32.440 --> 00:18:35.279
had personally owned a venture fund called the Open Ai

309
00:18:35.359 --> 00:18:38.400
Startup Fund. The board did not know that they thought

310
00:18:38.400 --> 00:18:40.599
open Ai owned it. They had to find out by

311
00:18:40.680 --> 00:18:44.000
accident he had been running a private investment vehicle off

312
00:18:44.039 --> 00:18:46.440
the open ai brand without telling the people who were

313
00:18:46.440 --> 00:18:48.160
supposed to be governing the charity.

314
00:18:48.839 --> 00:18:49.480
Toner said.

315
00:18:49.519 --> 00:18:53.440
Two senior executives at OpenAI brought screenshots and documentation to

316
00:18:53.519 --> 00:18:58.559
the board describing what they called, quote, psychological abuse from

317
00:18:58.720 --> 00:19:01.920
Altman terns of lying manipulation.

318
00:19:02.720 --> 00:19:03.880
Toner said, quote.

319
00:19:04.279 --> 00:19:07.519
They used the phrase psychological abuse, telling us they did

320
00:19:07.519 --> 00:19:09.359
not think he was the right person to lead the

321
00:19:09.400 --> 00:19:14.599
company to AGI. That is not me characterizing it. That

322
00:19:14.799 --> 00:19:17.519
is a former board member of the company in question

323
00:19:17.880 --> 00:19:21.960
on the record in a podcast. Now, Sam Altman has

324
00:19:22.000 --> 00:19:25.240
denied all of this. The current OpenAI board commissioned to

325
00:19:25.279 --> 00:19:28.799
review by an independent law firm. That review concluded that

326
00:19:28.839 --> 00:19:31.519
the prior board's decision was not based on concerns about

327
00:19:31.559 --> 00:19:36.279
product safety, security, the pace of development, or open AI's finances.

328
00:19:36.720 --> 00:19:38.799
So make of that what you will. What we know

329
00:19:38.920 --> 00:19:42.839
for sure is what happened next. Altman was fired on

330
00:19:42.880 --> 00:19:46.480
a Friday. By Monday morning, nearly every open ai employee

331
00:19:46.480 --> 00:19:48.880
had signed a letter threatening to quit if he was

332
00:19:48.920 --> 00:19:54.279
not reinstated. Microsoft CEO Sachia Nadella offered Altman and Brockman

333
00:19:54.400 --> 00:19:55.400
jobs at Microsoft.

334
00:19:55.920 --> 00:19:56.799
The board folded.

335
00:19:57.200 --> 00:20:01.079
By Wednesday, Altman was back, Helen Toner and Tasha McCauley

336
00:20:01.119 --> 00:20:05.279
were out. That is not a mistake, that is a choice.

337
00:20:05.880 --> 00:20:08.319
The choice the company made was to keep Altman and

338
00:20:08.440 --> 00:20:10.920
both of those women. The women who tried to fire

339
00:20:10.960 --> 00:20:13.799
Sam Altman in twenty twenty three are on the witness

340
00:20:13.799 --> 00:20:18.319
list for this trial. Helen Toner, Tasha McCauley. They will

341
00:20:18.359 --> 00:20:21.039
get their day in front of a jury with subpoena power,

342
00:20:21.079 --> 00:20:24.599
compelling testimony in a way they never got in twenty

343
00:20:24.680 --> 00:20:29.119
twenty three. Also on the witness list Ilia Suitskeever, who

344
00:20:29.200 --> 00:20:31.880
voted to fire Altman and then voted to bring him back.

345
00:20:32.599 --> 00:20:35.960
Mira Marati, the former chief Technology officer of open Ai,

346
00:20:36.200 --> 00:20:39.599
who served as briefly interim CEO during the seventy two

347
00:20:39.640 --> 00:20:43.000
hour coup and who reportedly provided some of the documentation

348
00:20:43.160 --> 00:20:47.519
that triggered the firing. Satya Nadella, the man Microsoft sent

349
00:20:47.559 --> 00:20:50.720
in to put out the fire, and Shivon Zillis, the

350
00:20:50.799 --> 00:20:53.759
former open Ai board member who later had four children

351
00:20:53.839 --> 00:20:57.319
with Elon Musk. That last witness, by the way, Shivon

352
00:20:57.519 --> 00:21:00.839
Zialis is one of the more delicate dynamic. In this case,

353
00:21:01.359 --> 00:21:03.920
she is testifying about decisions made when she was on

354
00:21:03.960 --> 00:21:07.519
the board before her relationship with Musk produced four children.

355
00:21:07.720 --> 00:21:11.119
In a case where Musk is the plaintiff, Lawyers love

356
00:21:11.200 --> 00:21:14.559
this kind of thing, juries are usually distracted by it.

357
00:21:15.720 --> 00:21:18.759
The trial is expected to run about four weeks. The

358
00:21:18.839 --> 00:21:23.200
first phase, focused on liability. Did open ai breach its

359
00:21:23.319 --> 00:21:27.519
charitable mission? Did Microsoft aid? And a bet, runs until

360
00:21:27.559 --> 00:21:30.759
around May twenty first. The judge will then take an

361
00:21:30.759 --> 00:21:35.279
advisory verdict from the jury. Antitrust claims, which Musk also

362
00:21:35.319 --> 00:21:38.599
filed against both companies are not part of this initial phase,

363
00:21:39.079 --> 00:21:42.119
and Judge Gonzales Rogers has indicated they may never be

364
00:21:42.240 --> 00:21:45.480
heard at all. If Musk wins this thing, open Ai

365
00:21:45.559 --> 00:21:49.160
could be forced to unwind its restructuring Sam Altman could

366
00:21:49.160 --> 00:21:51.960
be removed from the board. The one hundred and fifty

367
00:21:51.960 --> 00:21:54.839
billion dollar damages claim, which Musk says he does not

368
00:21:54.920 --> 00:21:57.799
want for himself. He wants it redirected back into the

369
00:21:57.839 --> 00:22:02.079
open Ai charity, could blow up the companies planned IPO,

370
00:22:02.359 --> 00:22:04.039
which by the way, would have been one of the

371
00:22:04.160 --> 00:22:09.319
largest in American history. If open Ai wins, Sam Altman

372
00:22:09.400 --> 00:22:12.880
solidifies control of the most influential AI company on Earth.

373
00:22:13.599 --> 00:22:17.880
The for profit conversion stands. The IPO goes forward, must

374
00:22:17.920 --> 00:22:20.480
goes home with a loss and a lot of legal bills.

375
00:22:20.920 --> 00:22:23.839
And if you were wondering, does any of this effect

376
00:22:23.880 --> 00:22:27.799
the actual development of artificial intelligence? Does any of this

377
00:22:27.880 --> 00:22:31.240
protect anybody from the technology that everybody who works on

378
00:22:31.279 --> 00:22:34.319
it agrees is going to reshape every job and every

379
00:22:34.359 --> 00:22:39.200
industry on the planet. No, none of it does. This

380
00:22:39.279 --> 00:22:42.680
trial is about money and control. The mission language is

381
00:22:42.759 --> 00:22:46.240
the rapper. Both sides know that the jury is going

382
00:22:46.279 --> 00:22:49.200
to have to figure it out. Accountability does not have

383
00:22:49.240 --> 00:22:53.680
a legal department. Charity, Real charity does not come with

384
00:22:53.720 --> 00:22:56.960
one hundred and fifty billion dollar damages claim attached to it.

385
00:22:57.559 --> 00:22:58.680
Real charity is what.

386
00:22:58.599 --> 00:23:01.359
You do when nobody is watched. Both of these guys

387
00:23:01.440 --> 00:23:04.400
have spent the last decade making sure everybody is watching.

388
00:23:09.279 --> 00:23:12.759
That is daily crime and justice for Wednesday, April twenty ninth,

389
00:23:12.839 --> 00:23:16.440
twenty twenty six. Elon Musk is back on the witness

390
00:23:16.440 --> 00:23:20.400
stand today in Oakland. Open AI's lawyers will eventually get

391
00:23:20.440 --> 00:23:26.640
their cross examination. Helen Toner, Tasha McCauley, Ilia Sutzkever Mira Muradi,

392
00:23:26.880 --> 00:23:30.039
and Satchya Nadella are all expected to testify in the

393
00:23:30.039 --> 00:23:33.519
coming weeks. Sam Altman will take the stand in his

394
00:23:33.559 --> 00:23:36.880
own defense. The trial is set to wrap around May

395
00:23:36.960 --> 00:23:40.519
twenty first. We will be tracking it, not because the

396
00:23:40.559 --> 00:23:44.599
world's too richest tech CEOs deserve our attention, they have plenty,

397
00:23:45.240 --> 00:23:48.279
but because the question underneath all of this, can a

398
00:23:48.359 --> 00:23:51.799
company sell itself as a public good charity, use that

399
00:23:51.920 --> 00:23:55.559
to raise money, and then quietly become a for profit

400
00:23:55.640 --> 00:23:59.599
machine is a real question, and the answer is going

401
00:23:59.640 --> 00:24:03.960
to matter for every nonprofit, every donor, every charitable trust

402
00:24:04.039 --> 00:24:07.839
in this country. Whatever you think of Elon Musk, whatever

403
00:24:07.880 --> 00:24:10.559
you think of Sam Altman, both can be true at

404
00:24:10.559 --> 00:24:11.200
the same time.

405
00:24:11.680 --> 00:24:13.759
Usually are do better.

406
00:24:14.160 --> 00:24:18.319
I'm Garrett Fisher Daily Crime and Justice. We'll see you

407
00:24:18.400 --> 00:24:22.039
back on the regular schedule tomorrow. Daily Crime and Justice

408
00:24:22.119 --> 00:24:26.000
is a production of Calaroga Shark Media. This episode was

409
00:24:26.039 --> 00:24:30.200
assembled with the assistance of artificial intelligence research and scripting tools,

410
00:24:30.559 --> 00:24:35.359
drawing on reporting from The New York Times, CNBC, CNN,

411
00:24:35.759 --> 00:24:40.119
The Washington Post, Bloomberg, Gizmoto, and other outlets covering the

412
00:24:40.200 --> 00:24:42.839
Musk versus Open AI trial in real time.

413
00:24:43.759 --> 00:24:45.880
The trial is in active progress.

414
00:24:46.119 --> 00:24:49.839
Details witness order and damages figures may shift between writing

415
00:24:49.920 --> 00:24:53.359
and recording. Damage's claim cited at one hundred and fifty

416
00:24:53.400 --> 00:24:57.000
billion dollars reflects current New York Times reporting. An earlier

417
00:24:57.079 --> 00:25:00.440
January twenty twenty six court filing referenced one one hundred

418
00:25:00.440 --> 00:25:04.000
and thirty four billion dollars in Wrongful Gains. Open AI

419
00:25:04.119 --> 00:25:07.559
valuation is cited at seven hundred thirty billion dollars. Some

420
00:25:07.680 --> 00:25:12.160
outlet's place it higher. Helen Toner's characterizations of Sam Altman

421
00:25:12.279 --> 00:25:16.039
come from her own podcast statements Sam Altman, Open AI,

422
00:25:16.200 --> 00:25:19.039
and an independent review by the law firm Wilmer Hale

423
00:25:19.160 --> 00:25:23.680
have publicly disputed her characterizations. This program is intended for

424
00:25:23.759 --> 00:25:28.240
informational and entertainment purposes only, and does not constitute legal advice.

425
00:25:29.160 --> 00:25:33.000
Allegations referenced in this episode are unproven unless otherwise stated,

426
00:25:33.319 --> 00:25:40.319
and all individuals named are presumed innocent of any uncharged conduct.